Here, we describe a protocol to generate a viable female murine model with non-random X chromosome inactivation, i.e., the maternally-inherited X chromosome is inactive in 100% of the cells. We also describe a protocol to test feasibility, tolerability, and safety of pharmacological reactivation of the inactive X chromosome in vivo.
X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the random silencing of one X chromosome in females to achieve gene dosage balance between the sexes. As a result, all females are heterozygous for X-linked gene expression. One of the key regulators of XCI is Xist, which is essential for the initiation and maintenance of XCI. Previous studies have identified 13 trans acting X chromosome inactivation factors (XCIFs) using a large-scale, loss-of-function genetic screen. Inhibition of XCIFs, such as ACVR1 and PDPK1, using short-hairpin RNA or small molecule inhibitors, reactivates X chromosome-linked genes in cultured cells. But the feasibility and tolerability of reactivating the inactive X chromosome in vivo remains to be determined. Towards this goal, a XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mouse model has been generated with non-random XCI due to deletion of Xist on one X chromosome. Using this model, the extent of inactive X reactivation was quantitated in the mouse brain following treatment with XCIF inhibitors. Recently published results show, for the first time, that pharmacological inhibition of XCIFs reactivates Mecp2 from the inactive X chromosome in cortical neurons of the living mouse brain.
X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a process of dosage compensation that balances X-linked gene expression by silencing one copy of the X chromosome in females1. As a result, the inactive X chromosome (Xi) accumulates characteristic features of heterochromatin including DNA methylation and inhibitory histone modifications, such as histone H3-lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and histone H2A ubiquitination (H2Aub)2. The master regulator of X chromosome silencing is the X-inactivation center (Xic) region, around 100−500 kb, which controls the counting and pairing of the X chromosomes, the random choice of the X chromosome for inactivation, and the initiation and spreading of silencing along the X chromosome3. The process of X inactivation is initiated by X inactive specific transcript (Xist) that coats the Xi in cis to mediate chromosome-wide silencing and remodel the three-dimensional structure of the X chromosome4. Recently, several proteomic and genetic screens have identified additional regulators of XCI, such as Xist interacting proteins5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. For example, a previous study using an unbiased genome-wide RNA interference screen identified 13 trans-acting XCI factors (XCIFs)12. Mechanistically, XCIFs regulate Xist expression and therefore, interfering with XCIFs function causes defective XCI12. Together, recent advances in the field have provided important insights into the molecular machinery that is required to initiate and maintain XCI.
Identification of XCI regulators and understanding their mechanism in XCI is directly relevant to X-linked human diseases, such as Rett syndrome (RTT)13,14. RTT is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a heterozygous mutation in the X-linked methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2) that affects predominantly girls15. Because MECP2 is located on the X chromosome, RTT girls are heterozygous for MECP2 deficiency with ~50% cells expressing wild-type and ~50% expressing mutant MECP2. Notably, RTT mutant cells harbor a dormant but wild-type copy of Mecp2 on the Xi, providing a source of the functional gene, which if reactivated, could potentially alleviate symptoms of the disease. In addition to RTT, there are several other X-linked human diseases, for which reactivation of Xi represents a potential therapeutic approach, such as DDX3X syndrome.
Inhibition of XCIFs, 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1 (PDPK1), and activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1), either by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) or small molecule inhibitors, reactivates Xi-linked genes12. Pharmacological reactivation of Xi-linked genes is observed in various ex vivo models that include mouse fibroblast cell lines, adult mouse cortical neurons, mouse embryonic fibroblasts, and fibroblast cell lines derived from an RTT patient12. However, whether pharmacological reactivation of Xi-linked genes is feasible in vivo remains to be demonstrated. One limiting factor is the lack of effective animal models to accurately measure the expression of genes from reactivated Xi. Towards this goal, a XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mouse model has been generated that carries a genetically labeled Mecp2 on Xi in all the cells due to heterozygous deletion in Xist on the maternal X chromosome16. Using this model, the expression of Mecp2 from Xi has been quantitated following treatment with XCIFs inhibitors in the brain of living mice. Here, the generation of the XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mouse model and methodology to quantitate Xi reactivation in cortical neurons using immunofluorescence-based assays is described.
Work involving mice was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; #4112).
1. Generate a Non-random XCI Mouse Model with Genetically Labeled Mecp2 on Xi
NOTE: Mouse strains used in the study were as follows: Mecp2-Gfp/Mecp2-Gfp (Mecp2tm3.1Bird, Table of Materials) and Xist/ΔXist (B6;129-Xist<tm5Sado>; provided by Antonio Bedalov, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle). Breeding strategies among the respective strains have been designed to expand the mouse colonies for each strain.
2. Design the Mouse Breeding Strategy to Generate XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp
3. Isolate Female XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts (MEFs)
4. Confirm the Lack of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) Expression in the Brain of XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp Mice Using a Ffluorescence Activated Cell Sorting-based Assay
5. Determine Feasibility of the XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp Mouse Model for Xi Reactivation
6. Demonstrate the Pharmacological Xi Reactivation in the Brain of the XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp Mouse Model
To demonstrate the feasibility of the XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mouse model for Xi reactivation studies, XCIF inhibitor-mediated reactivation of Xi-linked Mecp2-Gfp was tested in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Female MEFs were isolated from day 15.5 XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp embryos as described in section 3 (Figure 1A). The genotypes of female XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp MEFs were confirmed by genotyping-PCR, as described previously19 (Figure 1B), and FACS-based assay (Figure 1C). MEFs were treated with either DMSO or the two drugs LDN193189 and GSK650394 (0.5 μM and 2.5 μM, respectively) for 7 days. Following drug treatment, the expression of Mecp2-Gfp was monitored by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 1D, the drug treatment, but not DMSO, reactivated expression of Xi-Mecp2-Gfp. Next, quantitative immunofluorescence was carried out to determine the extent of Xi-Mecp2-Gfp expression in individual MEFs, as described in step 5.3.2. Signal from negative-control MEFs isolated from male embryos (Mecp2/Y) was set as the background, and ~66% of positive control Mecp2-Gfp/Mecp2 MEFs had a nuclear GFP signal. As expected, XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp MEFs treated with DMSO had a very low level of nuclear GFP (~3%). By contrast, ~31% of drug-treated XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2 MEFs were positive for nuclear GFP (Figure 1E). Together, these results demonstrate that XCIF inhibitors reactivate Xi-linked Mecp2 in MEFs, but the extent of Xi reactivation varies in the cell population.
To assess the feasibility of pharmacological Xi reactivation-based approach in vivo, whether drug treatment reactivates Xi-linked Mecp2 in the brain of XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp female mice was investigated. 10 μL of vehicle or 10 μL of XCIF inhibitors (1.5 mM LDN193189 and 1.6 mM GSK650394) was administered in opposite brain hemispheres of 4-week-old Xi-Mecp2-Gfp female mice by intracerebroventricular injection using stereotactic surgical procedures (Figure 2A,B). The procedure was repeated every second day (Figure 2C), and three weeks later, animals were euthanized, and brains were isolated. One subset was used for qRT-PCR and another was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The expression of wild-type Mecp2 and Xi-Mecp2-Gfp in the vehicle- and drug-infused hemispheres was determined by qRT-PCR (sequences of primers listed in Table 1). As shown in Figure 2D, drug treatment reactivated Xi-Mecp2-Gfp in ~30% of cells in the drug-infused brain hemisphere, whereas Xi- Mecp2-Gfp was not detected in the vehicle-infused hemisphere. A large number of MAP2, a neuronal marker, positive neurons were also GFP positive (~45%) in the drug-treated hemisphere, indicative of Xi-Mecp2-Gfp expression. Approximately 20% of MAP2 negative brain cells expressed GFP, confirming Xi-Mecp2-Gfp reactivation in non-neuronal cells (Figure 2E).
Figure 1: Generation and validation Xi-Mecp2 mouse model. (A) Schematic of the breeding strategy for generating XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mice. (B) PCR genotyping of Xist:Mecp2-Gfp/Y, XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2 and XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mice. Mice were monitored for the presence of Mecp2-Gfp, Mecp2 and sex-determining region Y (SRY). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of nuclei isolated from the mouse cortex. Mecp2/Mecp2-Gfp mouse cortex show ~50% of GFP-positive nuclei while XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp shows no GFP-positive nuclei. (D) qRT-PCR analysis monitoring the expression of Mecp2-Gfp and wild-type Mecp2 transcripts in female XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp MEFs following treatment with DMSO or drug (LDN193189 and GSK650394). Gapdh was monitored as a loading control. (E) Quantitative immunofluorescence monitoring GFP intensity in female XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp MEFs following treatment with DMSO or the drugs LDN193189 and GSK650394. MEFs isolated from Mecp2/Y or Mecp2/Mecp2-Gfp mice were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Each dot represents an MEF, and the dashed line indicates the maximum background signal obtained in Mecp2/Y, which was set to 1. Lower panel shows representative pictures of nuclei. This figure has been modified from Przanowski et al.16. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Pharmacological reactivation of X-linked Mecp2 in cerebral cortical neurons of living mice. (A) Schematic of a mouse skull and (B) brain showing the site of injection for vehicle or drug in the left or right hemispheres of the brain. (C) Schematic of the drug regimen. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images showing endogenous GFP signal (green) in coronal brain sections from vehicle- or drug-treated hemispheres. DAPI staining is shown in blue. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of the coronal brain sections monitoring the expression of GFP (anti-GFP; red) and MAP2 (green) in drug-treated hemisphere. DAPI staining is shown in blue. This figure has been modified from Przanowski et al.16. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Reverse primer (5’ -> 3’) | Anealing temperature/PCR product length |
GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGAG | 60 °C/87 bp |
GCTGAACTTGTGGCCGTTTA | 62 °C/137 bp |
TGTCAGAGCCCTACCCATAAG | 62 °C/140 bp |
GCACAACCCCGCAAATGCTA | 62 °C/364 bp |
GCACAACCCCGCAAATGCTA | 62 °C/250 bp |
AATTGCCCTAACGAGCACAC | 62 °C/436 bp |
GAACTTCAGGGTCAGCTTGC | 62 °C/217 bp |
CTCCTCTGTGACACTTTAGCCCTCCGA | 66 °C/270 bp |
Table 1: List of primers used for genotyping and quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
Previously, XCIFs that are selectively required for silencing of Xi-linked genes in mammalian female cells were identified12. We further optimized potent small molecule inhibitors to target XCIFs, such as ACVR1 and downstream effectors of PDPK1, which efficiently reactivate Xi-linked Mecp2 in mouse fibroblast cell lines, mouse cortical neurons, and a human fibroblast cell line derived from a RTT patient. These results suggest that Xi reactivation is a plausible therapeutic approach to rescue the gene deficiencies in X-linked disease patients; however, the in vivo feasibility remains to be determined. Recently, XCIF inhibitors were shown to reactivate Xi-linked Mecp2 in vivo, for which a non-random XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mouse model was generated.
An attractive feature of the XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp model is that it allows an accurate quantitation of the Xi-linked Mecp2 reactivation for several reasons. First, due to the deletion of Xist on the maternal X chromosome, the XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp mouse has non-random XCI. As a result, the genetically labeled Mecp2 is silent in 100% of cells (Figure 1C), unlike an expected 50:50 expression of X-linked genes in random XCI mice models, such as Xist:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp. Therefore, the results are not precluded by the mosaic expression of GFP, and 100% cells carry Mecp2-Gfp on Xi in the XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp model. Second, the genetic labeling of Mecp2 permits direct visualization of individual neurons with reactivated GFP, thereby minimizing the experimental manipulations in neuronal analysis.
A recent study found that intracerebroventricular injection of the XCIF inhibitors in the mouse brain hemisphere reactivates Xi-linked Mecp2 using immunofluorescence analysis of the mouse brain16. Importantly, drug treatment had no adverse effect on the general health, such as weight, grooming, or mobility16. Moreover, there is no toxicity detected by drug treatment in the liver or spleen. Together, this study provides an essential proof-of-principle to demonstrate that interfering with the function of XCIFs leads to de-repression of Xi in vivo.
In summary, a sensitive mouse model can be used to evaluate the reactivation of Xi. This animal model design can also be adapted for generating an improved RTT mouse model that harbors Mecp2 mutations (probably less symptomatic) on the active X chromosome and wild-type Mecp2 on the Xi in all cells. Due to non-random XCI, while the phenotypic symptoms may be more pronounced, it is expected that this model will also allow for better evaluation and accurate assessment of the reversal of symptoms due to Xi reactivation. Additionally, XistΔ:Mecp2/Xist:Mecp2-Gfp can also be modified to study Xi reactivation in other X-linked disease models, such as the DDX3X syndrome.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors thank Antonio Bedalov for providing reagents; University of Virginia Tissue Histology Core for cryosectioning; University of Virginia Flow Cytometry Core for flow cytometry analysis; Christian Blue and Saloni Singh for technical assistance with genotyping. This work was supported by a Double Hoo Research Grant to Z.Z., and a Pilot Project Program Award from the University of Virginia-Virginia Tech Seed Fund Award and the Hartwell Foundation Individual Biomedical Research Award to S.B.
MICE | |||
Mecp2tm3.1Bird | The Jackson Laboratory | #014610 | |
B6;129-Xist (tm5Sado) | provided by Antonio Bedalov, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle | ||
REAGENTS | |||
22×22 mm coverslip | FISHERfinest (Fisher Scientific) | 125488 | |
32% Paraformaldehyde | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 15714-S | |
50 ml syringe | Medline Industries | NPMJD50LZ | |
60mm culture dish | CellStar | 628160 | |
7-AAD | BioLegend | 420403 | |
ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) | Fisher Chemical | A661-3 | |
anti-GFP-AlexaFluor647 | Invitrogen | A-31852 | |
anti-MAP2 | Aves Labs | MAP | |
BSA | Promega | R396D | |
Buprenorphine SR | Zoopharm | ||
citric acid | Sigma | C-1857 | |
DMSO | Fisher Bioreagents | BP231-100 | |
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) | Corning Cellgro | 10-013-CV | |
Ethanol | Decon Labs | 2701 | |
fetal bovine serum (FBS) | VWR Life Science | 89510-198 | |
gelatin | Sigma-Aldrich | G9391 | |
glass slides | Fisherbrand | 22-034-486 | |
goat anti-chicken FITC-labeled secondary antibody | Aves Labs | F-1005 | |
GSK650394 | ApexBio | B1051 | |
hamilton 10μl syringe | Hamilton Sigma-Aldrich | 28615-U | |
Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) | Gibco | 14025-092 | |
Ketamine | Ketaset | NDC 0856-2013-01 | |
Large blunt/blunt curved scissors | Fine Science Tools | 14519-14 | |
LDN193189 | Cayman Chemicals | 11802 | |
lodixanol | Sigma | 1343517 | |
magnesium chloride (MgCl2) | Fisher Chemical | M35-212 | |
Methylcelulose | Sigma | M0262-100G | |
mounting medium with DAPI | Vectashield | H-1200 | |
Needle tip, 26 GA x 1.25" | PrecisionGlide | 305111 | |
ophthalmic ointment | Refresh Lacri-Lube | 93468 | |
optimal cutting temperature (O.C.T.) | ThermoFisher | ||
PCR mix | |||
Penicillin/Streptomycin (Pen/Strep) | Corning | 30-002-Cl | |
Phosphate buffered saline pH 7.4 (PBS) | Corning Cellgro | 46-103-CM | |
Potassium chloride (KCl) | Fisher Scientific | P330-500 | |
scalpel blades | |||
Shallow glass or plastic tray | |||
skin glue/tissue adhesive | 3M Vetbond | 1469SB | |
sodium azide | Fisher Scientific | CAS 26628-22-8 | |
Sodium chloride (NaCl) | Fisher Chemical | S642-212 | |
standard hemostat forceps | Fine Science Tools | 13013-14 | |
Standard tweezers | Fine Science Tools | 11027-12 | |
Straight iris scissors | Fine Science Tools | 14058-11 | |
sucrose | Fisher Scientific | BP220-1 | |
Tris-base | Fisher Bioreagents | BP152-5 | |
Triton X-100 | Fisher Bioreagents | BP151-500 | |
Trypsin-EDTA | Gibco | 15400-054 | |
Xylazine | Akorn | NDC: 59399-111-50 | |
EQUIPMENT | |||
Zeiss AxioObserver Live-Cell microscope | Zeiss | Zeiss AxioObserver | |
0.45mm burr | IDEAL MicroDrill | 67-1000 | |
BD FACScalibur | |||
centrifuge | |||
glass homogenizer | |||
cell culture incubator | Thermo Scientific HERACELL VIOS 160i | 13-998-213 | |
Leica 3050S research cryostat | |||
stereotactic platform | |||
thermocycler | |||
Timer | |||
ultracentrifuge | Beckman Coulter Optima L-100 XP | ||
Water bath (37 ºC) | Fisher Scientific Isotemp 2239 |