Swarming motility is influenced by physical and environmental factors. We describe a two-phase protocol and guidelines to circumvent the challenges commonly associated with swarm assay preparation and data collection. A macroscopic imaging technique is employed to obtain detailed information on swarm behavior that is not provided by current analysis techniques.
Bacterial surface motility, such as swarming, is commonly examined in the laboratory using plate assays that necessitate specific concentrations of agar and sometimes inclusion of specific nutrients in the growth medium. The preparation of such explicit media and surface growth conditions serves to provide the favorable conditions that allow not just bacterial growth but coordinated motility of bacteria over these surfaces within thin liquid films. Reproducibility of swarm plate and other surface motility plate assays can be a major challenge. Especially for more “temperate swarmers” that exhibit motility only within agar ranges of 0.4%-0.8% (wt/vol), minor changes in protocol or laboratory environment can greatly influence swarm assay results. “Wettability”, or water content at the liquid-solid-air interface of these plate assays, is often a key variable to be controlled. An additional challenge in assessing swarming is how to quantify observed differences between any two (or more) experiments. Here we detail a versatile two-phase protocol to prepare and image swarm assays. We include guidelines to circumvent the challenges commonly associated with swarm assay media preparation and quantification of data from these assays. We specifically demonstrate our method using bacteria that express fluorescent or bioluminescent genetic reporters like green fluorescent protein (GFP), luciferase (lux operon), or cellular stains to enable time-lapse optical imaging. We further demonstrate the ability of our method to track competing swarming species in the same experiment.
Many bacteria move on surfaces using various means of self-propulsion. Some motility phenotypes can be researched in the laboratory using plate assays that are affected by the liquid environment associated with the semi-solid plate assay composition. A subset of useful surface motility plate assays further involve a gas phase—typically room air. Accordingly, the outcome of any particular surface motility assay, demands careful control of the interface of three phases: the local environmental solid surface, liquid environment, and gas environment properties.
The most commonly studied motility mode in such a three-phase assay is known as swarming. Swarming motility is the coordinated group movement of bacterial cells that are propelled by their flagella through thin liquid films on surfaces1. It is typically studied in laboratories using semi-solid plate assays containing 0.4%-0.8% (wt/vol) agar1. An array of human pathogens exploit this motility behavior to explore and colonize the human host. For instance, Proteus mirabilis uses swarming motility to move up the urethra, reaching and colonizing the bladder and kidneys2. Swarming motility is generally considered a precursor step to biofilm formation, the primary cause of pathogenesis in many human pathogens3.
The swarming phenotype is highly varied among bacterial species; experimental success and reproducibility strongly rely on factors such as nutrient composition, agar type and composition, sterilization protocol (e.g., autoclaving), semi-solid media curing, and ambient moisture (e.g., seasonal changes), among others3-5. The variability of surface motility responses emphasizes the challenges encountered in these studies and the significant influence media and environment can exert. For some swarming species, such as Pseudomonas, swarming motility can occur on a variety of media compositions, although the observed phenotype and accompanying swarm expansion rate will vary greatly3. Combined, these factors can make surface motility studies extremely challenging. Seasonal variability within a lab can influence these three-phase assays: assays may function better in the humid-air of summer and worse in the dry air of winter. Here we present general guidelines to circumvent some of the most notable challenges when performing surface motility plate studies.
For some surface motility studies, the development of specific phenotypes is of great interest. Most, but not all, published studies to examine swarming of P. aeruginosa show the formation of tendrils or fractals radiating from an inoculation center3-9. Differences between P. aeruginosa strains have been documented5,8, but much of the presence or absence of tendrils can be attributed to the specific medium and protocol used for these swarm motility plate assays. Here we include details on how to promote tendril-forming swarms for P. aeruginosa. Because P. aeruginosa is just one of many swarming bacteria, we also include details for our method to examine swarming of Bacillus subtilis and gliding of Myxococcus xanthus. Like P. aeruginosa, current research on B. subtilis and M. xanthus spans an array of topics as researchers are working to discern aspects of sporulation, motility, stress response, and transitional behavior1,10. There is a need to quantify the patterns and dynamics of the specific behavior(s) for these cells in swarming groups.
Surface motility data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation can be cumbersome and qualitative. We have developed a protocol for the detailed macroscopic analysis of bacterial swarms that provides in addition to swarm zone morphology and size (e.g., diameter), quantitative dynamic information regarding swarm expansion rate and bacterial or bioproduct density distribution7. Furthermore, this method can take advantage of available fluorescent proteins, luminescence, and dyes to obtain a comprehensive view of bacterial interactions8, as well as to track the synthesis of bioproducts (e.g., P. aeruginosa rhamnolipid7,8) within a swarm.
1. Swarm Assay Media Preparation and Inoculation4,5,7,8,11
2. Macroscopic Imaging of Surface Motility Assays7,8
3. Data Processing and Interpretation7,8
Variation in plate preparation can greatly influence swarming motility. The curing or drying time after pouring of melted agar medium affects the thin liquid film present on surface motility assays and the bacterial motility over time. Changes in nutrient composition also affect swarming for several bacteria. Figure 1A shows a short-term effect of drying time upon spreading of India Ink and spreading of an initial inoculum of Bacillus subtilis11. Figure 1B shows the effect of drying time and Figure1C shows the effects of ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4] upon subsequent tendril development by swarming P. aeruginosa5.
Quantifiable data can be obtained from endpoint images of surface motility using multiple imaging strategies. Figure 2 shows representative surface growth results for P. aeruginosa swarming and its associated GFP fluorescence image; B. subtilis swarming and its associated bioluminescence image; and Myxococcus xanthus surface growth and the associated red fluorescence image of SYTO 64-stained cells.
Expansion of data acquisition beyond just inspection and imaging of end-point results allows for the study of dynamic behavior(s) for surface growing bacteria. Figure 37 shows an example of P. aeruginosa swarming (imaged for GFP expressing cells) and its associated rhamnolipid production (imaged using Nile Red lipid stain)—the quantification of data from these images is also displayed to show the expansion rate of P. aeruginosa swarming. Video 1 shows a time-lapse of B. subtilis swarming imaged using luminescence of a lux-expressing strain. Video 28 shows a time-lapse of P. aeruginosa (green—expressing GFP) and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (red—expressing lux) in a competitive swarm assay.
Figure 1: Examples of factors in surface motility assay preparation that affect assay outcome. Effect of (A) agar drying time on agar surface moisture and spreading of inoculum for B. subtilis (Ref8), (B) agar drying time on P. aeruginosa swarming (Reprinted from Ref5 with permission), and (C) presence or absence of ammonium sulfate on P. aeruginosa swarming and tendril formation.
Figure 2: Alternative approaches for imaging surface growth and motility of bacteria using a Bruker imaging station. Side by side image of a camera (left) and Bruker image (right) showing (A) P. aeruginosa expressing GFP—imaged using Green Fluorescence settings, (B) B. subtilis expressing lux bioluminescence reporter—imaged using Luminescence settings, and (C) M. xanthus stained with SYTO 64—imaged using Red Fluorescence II settings. See Table 2 for setting details.
Figure 3: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of a surface motility assay. (A) Time-lapse analysis of cell density distribution, rhamnolipid production (Nile Red lipid stain imaged using the Red Fluorescence I settings; scale bar = 15 mm), and (B) quantification of the of expansion rate from cell density distribution images of a P. aeruginosa swarm. (Reprinted from Ref6 with permission.)
Video 1. Time-lapse imaging of a B. subtilis swarm. B. subtilis expressing lux and recorded using the Luminescence settings. See Table 2 for setting details.
Video 2. Interspecies competition visualized by time-lapse imaging. Swarms of P. aeruginosa (green; expressing GFP and recorded using the Green Fluorescence settings) and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (red; expressing lux and recorded using the Luminescence settings). See Table 2 for setting details. (Reprint with permission from Ref7.)
P. aeruginosa | P. aeruginosa tendril formation studies | B. subtilis | M. xanthus | |
Overnight broth culture media | FAB plus 30 mM Glucose | FAB plus 30 mM Glucose | LB | CTT |
Overnight broth culture incubation temperature | 37 °C | 37 °C | 37 °C | 30 hr at 30 °C |
Swarm media | FAB | FAB minus (NH4)2SO4 | 2% (wt/vol) LB | CTT |
Swarm media: additional components | 12 mM Glucosea | 10% (wt/vol) CAA, 12 mM Glucosea | n/a | SYTO® 64a |
Agar type | Agar, Noble | Agar, Noble | Granulated agar | Agar, Noble Affymetrix |
Agar concentration (wt/vol) | 0.45% | 0.45% | 0.60% | 1.50% |
Swarm plate size | 60 mm | 60 mm | 100 mm | 150 mm |
Media volume per plate | 7.5 ml | 7.5 ml | Hand Poured | Hand Poured |
Swarm media setting/drying method | Hood; plates uncovered | Hood; plates uncovered | Benchtop; plates covered | Benchtop; plates covered |
Swarm media setting/drying time | 30 min | 30 min | Overnight (20 -24 hr) | Overnight (20 -24 hr) |
Swarm assay incubation temperature | 30 or 37 °C | 30 °C | 37 °C | 30 °C |
Incubation for time lapse imaging | 30 °C for at least 4 hr | 30 °C for at least 4 hr | 37 °C for 2 hr | RT for 12 hr |
Time-lapse capture length | 24 hr | 24 hr | 10 hr | 66 hr |
Time-lapse setting | 1 frame/10 min | 1 frame/10 min | 1 frame/6 min | 1 frame/10 min |
aAdded after autoclaving. |
Table 1: Specifications for Surface Motility Assay Preparation. Includes surface motility assay preparation specifications for P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, and M. xanthus.
Signal | Green Fluorescence | Red Fluorescence I | Red Fluorescence II | Luminescence |
Protein or dye | Green Fluorescence Protein (GFP) | mCherry protein or Nile Red rhamnolipid stain | SYTO® 64 | Luciferase from lux operon |
Excitation wavelength (nm) | 480 ± 10 | 540 ± 10 | 590 ± 10 | Off |
Emission wavelength (nm) | 535 ± 17.5 | 600 ± 17.5 | 670 ± 17.5 | No filter |
Exposure time (sec) | 30 | 60 | 60 | 240 |
f-stop | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.1 |
FOV (mm) | 190 | 190 | 140 | 120 |
Focal plane (mm) | 27.5 | 27.5 | 12.2 | 4 |
Binning (pixels) | None | 2 x 2 | None | 8 x 8 |
Table 2: Imaging Specification. Bruker imaging station specifications for red and green fluorescence, and luminescence imaging of bacterial surface growth.
Achieving reproducible swarming in a laboratory can be challenging, as swarm assays are highly sensitive to environmental factors, such as humidity and available nutrients. The most critical aspect of a surface motility plate assay is moisture on the agar surface. Prior to inoculation, swarm media must be dry enough to prevent bacterial cells from swimming across the surface liquid, but not so dry as to inhibit swarming motility5. Incubation should take place in a sufficiently humid environment: too little moisture can result in the assay drying out during incubation, while too much moisture can lead to artificial or artifactual surface spreading. Unless a humidity-controlled incubator is at hand, incubator and laboratory humidity can vary dramatically. Consequently, an additional water reservoir, a humidifier, or a dehumidifier within the incubator might be required to prevent over drying or the accumulation of excess moisture while keeping the relative humidity near 80%. Maintaining this ideal humidity may prove challenging if seasonal humidity changes are significant. If this is the case, the swarm assay protocol will require some adjustments to account for seasonal changes in humidity. We have found that modifying the swarm media drying time is the simplest way to adjust for seasonal humidity changes. Constant humidity monitoring, both inside and outside of the incubator, is recommended. Further, it is recommended that researchers calibrate and validate their instruments, incubators, scales, etc. as minor errors in temperature, volume or amounts of media components can impact reproducibility of these assays.
It should also be noted that the type and size of the plate used in the assay can affect plate moisture, and thus swarming. Airtight plates do not vent off excess moisture, thus encouraging swimming motility. In contrast, open-faced plates allow too much moisture to escape. A Petri dish provides an ideal environment because it vents off enough excess moisture to prevent liquid build up, but retains enough moisture to prevent the media from drying out. This method details a surface motility assay protocol that allows for high quality imaging. To keep the agar clear for imaging 60 mm diameter dishes are filled with 7.5 ml of agar media. If detailed imaging is not required, volumes up to 20 ml can also provide reproducible results.
While swarming motility can be achieved on a wide array of agar concentrations, the optimal range of agar required for swarming depends on the species. Overall, higher agar concentrations inhibit swarming motility, and consequently the time needed to produce an image-ready swarm increases. P. aeruginosa generally swarms on agar concentrations between 0.4-0.7%1, however we find that optimal swarming occurs in a much narrower range (0.4-0.5%). Others, such as B. subtilis and S. enterica swarm at 0.6% agar, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus at 1.5% agar10. The required agar concentration is also determined by the type and brand of agar. Higher purity agars, like Noble agar, strongly enhance swarming in P. aeruginosa and are preferred over granulated agar13,14. However, these purified versions of agar are also more prone to caramelization during the autoclave sterilization cycle; depending on the instrument, a shortened/modified sterilization sequence (to possibly alter the exhaust cycle to prevent prolonged heat exposure) may be required to prepare swarm media using Noble agar.
Media composition also plays a role in the observed swarm phenotype3. P. aeruginosa swarming motility studies are usually performed using minimal nutrient media. We prefer FAB medium4,8 (Materials Table), but other media, such as M9, LB, or slight variations to these common media, have been used successfully9,15,16. Tendril formation is best achieved on FAB minimal medium supplemented with glucose as the carbon source and casamino acids (CAA), but without an additional nitrogen source (i.e., (NH4)2SO4)6,13. If tendril formation or morphology is not the main focus of the study, then FAB minimal medium (Materials Table; Table 1) devoid of CAA is recommended so that the effects of specific carbon sources and/or additional nutrients can be studied in detail. Other species, such as B. subtilis (presented here), are versatile swarmers, capable of swarming on LB and granulated agar. These species swarm readily, requiring only ~10 hr to develop a full swarm. This fast swarming rate makes following the progression of the swarm potentially difficult but our protocol makes such tracking very feasible. The ability to perform swarm time-lapse imaging provides a substantial ease in swarm data acquisition, particularly from such avid swarmers.
We introduce a robust, comprehensive, two-phase protocol and guidelines aimed at enhancing the execution and reproducibility of bacterial surface motility research and have primarily emphasized aspects important to examine flagellar-mediated swarming. This swarm assay protocol details important aspects of media composition and handling of surface motility plates to provide for greater consistency and reproducibility within and among research groups. This will improve the basis of comparison among different research studies. In addition, the presented approach and protocol provides means to make research on swarming and surface motility less susceptible to environmental variations by making researchers aware that such factors affect their work and providing possible solutions (e.g., how small changes in agar affect swarming4,5). Furthermore, the protocol provided to quantify macroscopic aspects of swarming, provides an opportunity to measure many attributes of bacterial surface growth that were previously unquantifiable.
We have not examined all surface motile bacteria in the development of this protocol. As such, it is expected that protocol modifications will be required for species not presented here. The efficiency of this protocol is restricted by the inherent limits of the equipment and materials employed. For instance, temperature related studies are not possible as yet with the Bruker imaging station, since temperature control is not a feature of the equipment. In addition, the use of dyes (such as Nile Red to stain rhamnolipids) can have kinetic and concentration limitations8. This technique strongly relies on the processing and analysis of digital images; improved automation of data analysis (e.g., using additional Macros script function in ImageJ) would reduce the time needed for analysis and expand the usefulness of the data. Finally, due to the robustness of the imaging protocol, future applications should aim at expanding this technique to examine less uniform growth surfaces that are more relevant to surfaces colonized by environmental and pathogenic bacteria.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Institute of Health (R01GM100470 and 1R01GM095959-01A1; to MA and JDS) and a Core Facility grant from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (funded in part by NIH grant #UL1 TR000006; to JDS).
Materials table | ||||
Company | Catalog Number | Amount | Comments | |
Reagentsa: | ||||
FAB Minimal Media: | Prepare every ~4 weeks. Top to 1 L with nanopure H2O. | |||
(NH4)2SO4 | Sigma | A4418 | 2 g | Not used in P. aeruginosa tendril formation studies. |
Na2HPO4 x 7H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | S9390 | 9 g | |
KH2PO4 | Sigma | P5655 | 3 g | |
NaCl | BDH | BDH8014 | 3 g | |
MgCl2 x 6H2O solution (198 g/L) | Fisher Scientific | M33 | 1 ml | |
CaCl2 x 2H2O solution (14 g/L) | Fisher Scientific | C79 | 1 ml | |
Trace metal solution (see below) | n/a | n/a | 1 ml | |
Trace Metal Solution: | Top to 1 L with nanopure H2O. Maintain in a glass bottle, stirring and covered with foil. | |||
CaSO4 x 2H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | 255548 | 200 mg | |
MnSO4 x H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | M7634 | 20 mg | |
CuSO4 x 5H2O | Fisher Scientific | C493 | 20 mg | |
ZnSO4 x 7H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | Z4750 | 20 mg | |
CoSO4 x 7H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | C6768 | 10 mg | |
NaMoO4 x 2H2O | Sigma | S6646 | 10 mg | |
H3BO3 | Fisher Scientific | A74 | 5 mg | |
FeSO4 x 7H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | F7002 | 200 mg | |
CTT Media: | Prepare as needed. Top to 100 ml with nanopure H2O. | |||
Tris-HCl, 1 M solution (adjust to pH 8.0) | Amresco | 0234 | 1 ml | Prepare a 1 M stock solution in nano pure H2O. Adjust pH to 8.0 and filter sterilize (0.2 μm pore). |
K2HPO4, 1 M solution (adjust to pH 7.6) | Sigma-Aldrich | P3786 | 0.1 ml | Prepare a 1 M stock solution in nano pure H2O. Adjust pH to 7.6 and filter sterilize (0.2 μm pore). |
MgSO4 solution | Fisher Scientific | M65 | 0.8 ml | Prepare a 1 M stock solution in nano pure H2O. Filter sterilize (0.2 μm pore). |
Casitone | BD Diagnostics | 225930 | 1 g | |
Additional Reagents: | ||||
LB Broth, Lennox | BD Diagnostics | 240230 | 2 % (wt/vol) | |
D-(+)-Glucose | Sigma-Aldrich | G5767 | 30 mM for overnight broth cultures; 12 mM for swarm media | Prepare a 1.2 M filter sterilized stock solution in nano pure H2O. Add to media after autoclaving. |
Casamino acids (CAA) | Amresco | J851 | 0.10 % (wt/vol) | Recommended for P. aeruginosa tendril formation studies. Add to media prior to autoclaving. |
Agar, Noble | Sigma-Aldrich | A5431 | 0.45 % (wt/vol) | Preferred Noble agar for P. aeruginosa surface motility studies. Add to media prior to autoclaving. |
Agar, Noble | Affymetrix | 10907 | 1.50 % (wt/vol) | Used in M. xanthus surface motility studies. Not recommended for P. aeruginosa motility studies. Add to media prior to autoclaving. |
Agar, Granulated | Fisher Scientific | BP1423 | 0.60 % (wt/vol) | |
Higgins Waterproof Black India Ink | Higgins | HIG44201 | 0.50 % (vol/vol) | Mix ink with inoculum to test swarm media surface moisture. |
SYTO® 64 Red Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Stain | Invitrogen | S-11346 | Use 4 μl (for P. aeruginosa) or 8 µl (for M. xanthus) of SYTO® 64 per 100 ml of molten agar (added after autoclaving). | |
Relevant Materials and Equipment: | ||||
Petri dish, sterile, 150 mm x 15 mm (Dia.x H) | VWR | 25384-326 | ||
Petri dish, sterile, 100 mm x 15 mm (Dia.x H) | VWR | 25384-342 | ||
Petri dish, sterile, 60 mm x 15 mm (Dia.x H) | VWR | 25384-092 | ||
In-Vivo Xtream | Bruker | Use for the macroscopic imaging of surface motility studies. http://www.bruker.com/products/preclinical-imaging/opticalx-ray-imaging/in-vivo-xtreme/overview.html | ||
Bruker MI software | Bruker | http://www.bruker.com/fileadmin/user_upload/8-PDF-Docs/PreclinicalImaging/Brochures/MI-software-brochure.pdf | ||
ImageJ software | NIH | http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ | ||
aSee MSDS of reagents for handeling and disposal information. |