RGBradford: Protein Quantitation with a Smartphone Camera

Daniel C. Moreira

doi:10.3791/65547

JoVE Journal > Biochemistry

Biochemistry

RGBradford: Protein Quantitation with a Smartphone Camera

Published: September 08, 2023

doi:

10.3791/65547

Daniel C. Moreira¹

¹Research Center in Morphology and Applied Immunology, Faculty of Medicine,University of Brasilia

Summary

This paper provides a protocol for protein quantification using the Bradford assay and a smartphone as an analytical device. Protein levels in samples can be quantified using color data extracted from a picture of a microplate taken with a smartphone.

Abstract

Protein quantitation is an essential procedure in life sciences research. Amongst several other methods, the Bradford assay is one of the most used. Because of its widespread, the limitations and advantages of the Bradford assay have been exhaustively reported, including several modifications of the original method to improve its performance. One of the alterations of the original method is the use of a smartphone camera as an analytical instrument. Taking advantage of the three forms of the Coomassie Brilliant Blue dye that exist in the conditions of the Bradford assay, this paper describes how to accurately quantify protein in samples using color data extracted from a single picture of a microplate. After performing the assay in a microplate, a picture is taken using a smartphone camera, and RGB color data is extracted from the picture using a free and open-source image analysis software application. Then, the ratio of blue to green intensity (in the RGB scale) of samples with unknown concentrations of protein is used to calculate the protein content based on a standard curve. No significant difference is observed between values calculated using RGB color data and those calculated using conventional absorbance data.

Introduction

Regardless of the downstream use (e.g., ELISA, enzyme kinetics, western blotting, protein purification, and mass spectrometry), protein quantification is crucial for accurate analysis in life sciences laboratories. In addition to their use as secondary readouts (i.e., to calculate relative levels of analytes per mass of protein), protein levels in a sample can also be the desired output itself. For example, one can be interested in protein levels in food resources¹ or in urine². There are many methods available to measure protein concentration in samples³, including direct UV absorbance readings⁴, protein-copper chelation⁵^,⁶, protein-dye binding colorimetric assays⁷, and protein-dye binding fluorescent assays⁸. The relevance of protein quantitation is evidenced by the presence of two papers describing protein measurement methods⁵^,⁷ in the top-3 of the most cited literature⁹^,¹⁰. Despite the fact that many authors neglect their actual citation by citing non-primary references or not citing anything at all, the original papers describing the Lowry protein assay and the Bradford protein assay amount >200,000 citations each¹⁰.

The popularity of the Bradford assay stems from its affordability, simplicity, speed, and sensitivity. The assay is based on the interaction between proteins and the dye Coomassie Brilliant Blue G under acidic conditions. Under the conditions of the assay (i.e., low pH), the dye exists in three forms: a red cationic form with λmax at 470 nm; a green neutral form with λmax at 650 nm; and a blue anionic form with λmax at 590 nm¹¹^,¹² (Figure 1). The cationic form predominates in the absence of proteins. As proteins interact with the dye, they stabilize the blue anionic form, causing a noticeable change in the color of the solution, from brownish to blue. Usually, the change in the concentration of the blue form of the dye is quantified spectrophotometrically, whose absorbance at 590-595 nm is proportional to the quantity of protein in the assay.

Figure 1: Coomassie brilliant blue G absorption spectra under the conditions of the Bradford assay. The three main peaks are marked with arrows indicating the λmax of the red (470 nm), green (650 nm), and blue (590 nm) forms of the dye. Spectra were recorded in the absence of protein (yellow line) and in the presence of 3 µg (gray line) and 10 µg (blue line) of bovine serum albumin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

The widespread use of the Bradford assay has led to the identification of several limitations (e.g., variable responses to different proteins¹¹, and interference by lipids¹³ and detergents⁷) and the development of modifications to improve its performance (e.g., the addition of detergents¹⁴^,¹⁵, alkalinization¹⁴^,¹⁶ and use of the ratio of absorbances¹⁷). In addition to modifications in the assay itself, the use of alternative devices, such as smartphones or cameras, to capture analytical signals have also been described¹⁸^,¹⁹^,²⁰. Indeed, the development of methods that make use of smartphones as portable chemical analyzers has been an active area of research. The motivation for the use of smartphones stems from the affordability, portability, ease of use, and widespread availability of these devices.

This paper provides a protocol for protein quantification using the RGBradford assay²⁰, which uses a smartphone as an analytical device. In contrast to the original RGBradford publication²⁰, here, a procedure that streamlines the color extraction process has been introduced. It involves the utilization of a freely available software application to extract color information from each well of a microplate picture automatically, saving significant time and effort. This is an alternative to the previous method of manually acquiring color data from each well one by one using a graphics editor software application²⁰. Ultimately, protein levels in samples can be quantified using color data extracted from a picture of a microplate taken with a smartphone.

Protocol

1. Preparation of the Bradford protein assay reagent

Dissolve 100 mg of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G in 50 mL 95% (w/v) ethanol. Mix until Coomassie Brilliant Blue G is completely dissolved.
CAUTION: Ethanol is flammable and causes eye irritation. Avoid flames and use goggles.
To the previous solution, add 100 mL of 85% (w/v) phosphoric acid carefully.
CAUTION: Phosphoric acid is corrosive to metals and causes skin corrosion, serious eye damage, and acute oral toxicity. Wear gloves and goggles.
Add the solution containing Coomassie Brilliant Blue G, ethanol, and phosphoric acid slowly to 600 mL of deionized water.
Dilute the solution to a final volume of 1,000 mL. Scale up or down according to the number of samples to be analyzed. As described in the original method⁷, final concentrations in the working Bradford reagent should be 0.01% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue G, 4.7% (w/v) ethanol, and 8.5% (w/v) phosphoric acid.
Remove any insoluble material filtering through filter paper (Whatman #1 paper or equivalent).
The reagent is stable for several weeks when stored at room temperature (RT) and protected from light. Filter as necessary since precipitates may form over time.
NOTE: Alternatively, ready to dilute and use Bradford reagents are commercially available. Follow the manufacturer's instructions for preparing the reagent and proceed to the next step.

2. Preparation of protein standard solutions

Prepare a stock solution (refer to step 2.4) of an isolated protein to be used as standard. An affordable and commonly used protein is bovine serum albumin (BSA). Other options are ovalbumin and bovine gamma globulin.
If the molar absorptivity of the protein used as standard is known, check the concentration of the stock solution in a spectrophotometer.
For BSA, a commonly used formula is BSA (mg/mL) = (A280/6.6) × 10, where A280 is the absorbance at 280 nm with a path length of 1 cm read against an appropriate blank (i.e., ε₂₈₀^1% = 6.6)⁷. For example, 0.8 mg/mL BSA has an absorbance of 0.528 at 280 nm.
To generate the standard curve, prepare several dilutions of BSA within 0.025 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL. These will result in 0.25-10 µg of BSA per well after adding a sample volume of 10 µL per well.
NOTE: Protein standard solutions should be prepared in a medium with the same composition (final concentration) of the medium used to prepare samples.

3. Assay

Dilute the samples to achieve a protein concentration within the standard curve range of 0.025-1.0 mg/mL. Have several (at least 3) sample dilutions within the range.
NOTE: Samples can be diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or any other medium/buffer composition compatible with the Bradford reagent. The final concentration of medium components should not differ between standard and samples.
Add 10 µL of each protein standard solution to three wells (i.e., in triplicate) of a 96-well microplate. For the 0 (zero) protein point, add 10 µL of the buffer/medium used to prepare the standard solutions and sample dilutions.
To another set of wells, add 10 µL of each sample dilution to three wells (i.e., in triplicate) of the same 96-well microplate. One approach is to add different volumes of a sample and complete with a medium of up to 10 µL per well (e.g., 0.5 µL, 1 µL, 2 µL, 4 µL, and 8 µL of the sample plus 9.5 µL, 9 µL, 8 µL, 6 µL, and 2 µL of medium).
Add 250 µL of Bradford protein assay reagent to all wells. A typical microplate setup is shown in Figure 2. In this example, a set of blank wells containing 260 µL (the final volume per well) water was included to serve as blank in a microplate reader (step 4.5). This is required only if absorbance data will also be collected.
NOTE: Prepare a standard curve in the same microplate of samples each time the assay is performed. In other words, if the number of samples requires another plate, prepare another standard curve in the second plate, and so on.
Record results (section 4) within 5-15 min.

Figure 2: A typical plate layout for the Bradford protein assay. Blank refers to three wells containing 260 µL of water to be used as blank in a microplate reader. STD refers to protein standards. S1-S6 are six different samples. SX_1-SX_4 are four different sample dilutions for each sample. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

4. Recording results

In a well-illuminated room, hold the microplate parallel to the bench against a uniform white background (e.g., a paper sheet) with one hand. Ensure accurate alignment by placing a bubble level on the plate.
With the other hand, hold the smartphone parallelly (some camera applications usefully indicate the inclination of the device) to the bench and the microplate and take one or several pictures of the whole microplate (Figure 3). In iOS devices, turn on the camera level indicator in the camera settings by enabling the Grid option. In Android devices, turn on the camera level indicator in the camera settings by enabling Framing Hints.
No special lighting apparatus is required, but take care to avoid shadows and reflections. For example, avoid shading the plate or the background with the smartphone and avoid shading the background with the microplate. Small reflections in the edges of the well area are not a problem; color data can be extracted from a very small area in the center of each well.
Briefly check the picture for background uniformity, shadows, and reflections. Also, take a look at the angle of the wells; the center of each well should be directly visible (i.e., not behind well walls).
If the comparison between microplate absorbance readings and picture color data is desired, read the microplate at 590 nm and 450 nm in a microplate reader²¹.

Figure 3: Capturing the results of the Bradford protein assay. In a well-illuminated room, the microplate is positioned parallelly to the bench against a uniform background with one hand. With the other hand, the smartphone is hold parallelly to the bench and the microplate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

5. Extracting color data-Automatically

Download ImageJ and ReadPlate²², an ImageJ plugin is available at https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/readplate/index.html (this is a .txt file).
Open ImageJ, click on Plugins > Install and select the file downloaded in step 6.1.
Set the measurement parameters by clicking on Analyze > Set Measurements and check the following options: Area; Standard deviation; Min & max gray value; Mean gray value; Modal gray value. On the bottom of the window, set Redirect to: None and Decimal places (0-9): 3.
Go to File > Open and select the picture of the microplate taken in step 4.
Go to Plugins > ReadPlate. Read the instructions and then click OK.
Select the number of wells: 96.
Using the Rectangular selection tool automatically loaded by the plugin, make a rectangle beginning in the center of the A1 well and ending in the center of the H12 well. Then, click OK.
Select the Blue channel and click OK.
Confirm the default parameters by clicking on OK.
Check if the software delineated an area inside each well and if the selected areas are not covering areas with abnormal shadows or reflection. Click OK.
Save the results and repeat steps 5.8-5.10 for the green channel.
Calculate the blue-to-green ratio using the mode for each color.
NOTE: The calculation can be done manually or using the software of the reader preferences, such as R, Microsoft Excel, or GraphPad Prism.

6. Extracting color data-Manually

Download Inkscape, a free and open-source graphics editor.
NOTE: Any software with the color picker tool (usually depicted as an eye dropper) can be used to identify the color and extract RGB data.
Open Inkscape, go to File > Open. Select the picture of the microplate taken in Step 4.
Pick the Select and Transform Objects (S) tool, which is depicted as an arrow on the top-left side, and click on the picture. A dashed line border will indicate the selection.
Select the Pick Colors from Image (D) tool, which is depicted as an eye dropper on the left side.
Click in the center of a well. The color on the bottom panel ("Fill:") will change accordingly. Click on the color and a Fill and Stroke tab will pop up on the right side.
Change the Flat Color dropdown menu to RGB. Record the values shown for the blue and green channels for each well.
Calculate the blue-to-green ratio using the recorded values.
NOTE: The calculation can be done manually or using the software of the reader preferences, such as R, Microsoft Excel, or GraphPad Prism.

7. Building standard curves and extrapolating unknowns

Plot the average green-to-blue intensity ratio as a function of protein standard concentration.
NOTE: Plot the data manually or using the software of the reader preferences, such as R, Microsoft Excel, or GraphPad Prism.
Calculate the average green-to-blue intensity ratio for each sample and dilution.
Check if the signal obtained for the sample lies within the linear range of the protein standard.
Ignore any value below or above the minimum or maximum values of the standard curve.
Use the linear equation describing the standard curve to extrapolate the amount of protein in the sample. Multiply the calculated values by the dilution factor accordingly.

Representative Results

Figure 4 is a picture of a microplate from which color data was extracted, and absorbance at 450 nm and 590 nm was recorded. The RGB color data reported here as representative were obtained automatically as described in section 5. A typical pattern of color data is an increase in the blue values and a decrease in the red and green values (Figure 5). Note that despite the evident reflection in all wells and a not perfectly aligned microplate (Figure 4), color data extracted from the picture accurately reflects absorbance readings (Figure 6). There is also a linear relationship between sample dilution and signal for both absorbance readings and color data (Figure 7). For these representative results, two samples were used, a BV-2 cell lysate (B001) and a Galleria mellonella homogenate (G001) prepared as previously described²⁰, from which 0.5 µL, 1 µL, 2 µL, 4 µL, and 8 µL were used for each well. The volume was adjusted to 10 µL with buffer before the addition of 250 µL of Bradford reagent.

Figure 4: A representative picture of a Bradford assay microplate. Note the lamp reflection on each well and the misalignment of wells (i.e., the right side of the plate is tilted down). These should be minimized as possible, but perfect alignment and lighting are not necessary (see representative results). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Color intensity from the three RGB channels as a function of protein concentration. Each point represents a well of the standard curve in the microplate shown in Figure 4. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Absorbance readings versus RGB color data extracted from a picture. Each point represents a well of the standard curve in the microplate shown in Figure 4. The yellow shading represents the 95% confidence interval. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Signal intensity versus sample volume. Columns are different signals from different methods: absorbance readings (Absorbance) and RGB color data extracted (RGB data). Rows are different samples: a BV-2 cell lysate (B001) and a Galleria mellonella homogenate (G001). Each point is the average value of three wells of a given sample volume. The yellow shading represents the 95% confidence interval. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

The standard curve (signal versus BSA concentration) should be strictly linear, as shown for a representative standard curve built with BSA concentrations of 0.025 mg/mL, 0.05 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, 0.2 mg/mL, 0.4 mg/mL, 0.6 mg/mL, 0.8 mg/mL, and 1.0 mg/mL (Figure 8).

Figure 8: A typical standard curve illustrating the linearity of the blue-to-green ratio with bovine serum albumin (BSA) concentration. The concentrations used for a typical standard curve are 0 mg/mL, 0.025 mg/mL, 0.05 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL, 0.2 mg/mL, 0.4 mg/mL, 0.6 mg/mL, 0.8 mg/mL, and 1.0 mg/mL. Each point is the average value of three wells of each BSA concentration. Error bars represent the standard deviation. The yellow shading represents the 95% confidence interval. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

In this example of representative results, some of the dilutions were not within the linear range of the standard curve (Figure 9). For sample B001, 8 µL resulted in a signal above the highest point of the standard curve. In the case of G001, 0.5 µL and 1 µL resulted in signals below the lowest point of the standard curve. For both samples, these dilutions lying outside the linear range of the standard curve should be discarded. After ignoring readings outside the range of the standard curve, protein levels calculated using absorbance readings do not differ from those calculated using RGB data for both samples (Figure 10). The comparison between absorbance data and RGB data using a t test resulted in p = 0.63 for sample B001 and p = 0.17 for sample G001.

Figure 9: Blue-to-green ratio as obtained using the RGBradford method versus sample volume. The horizontal lines delimit the minimum and maximum blue-to-green ratios of the standard curve (Figure 8). Blue circles represent a BV-2 cell lysate (B001), and red symbols represent a Galleria mellonella homogenate (G001). Error bars represent the standard deviation. Note that some sample dilutions are outside the range of the standard curve. The yellow shading represents the 95% confidence interval. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10: Protein concentration in two biological samples quantified with the Bradford protein assay using conventional absorbance readings (ABS) and the RGBradford method (RGB). Blue symbols represent a BV-2 cell lysate (B001), and red symbols represent a Galleria mellonella homogenate (G001). Each circle represents a single well from which data were obtained. Diamonds denote the mean, and the vertical lines span from the minimum to the maximum values for each sample/method. There are no differences between methods (B001, t test, p = 0.63; G001, t test, p = 0.17). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Supplementary Figure 1: Signals obtained using different smartphones. Pearson correlation coefficients for the signal (blue-to-green ratio) obtained with different smartphone models and the signal (A590/A450) from the Spectramax iD3 microplate reader. Please click here to download this File.

Discussion

This paper describes RGBradford, a method that uses a smartphone camera to record data from a Bradford protein assay, extract color data, and accurately quantify protein levels in biological samples as originally described recently²⁰. One difference from the original RGBradford method is that here a procedure for obtaining color data automatically with an ImageJ plugin²² was used. The main novelty of the RGBradford method is the use of RGB data as analytical signals; thus, one can use whatever routine protocol used in its lab for protein determination with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G and then take a picture of it and extract color data. In other words, steps 1-3 of the protocol can be modified according to the usual procedure used in a given laboratory. Given the existence of multiple modifications of the original Bradford protein assay, one can use whichever works better for its sample type/nature and proceed to data recording.

This protocol has two critical steps, picture capture, and color data extraction. Here and previously²⁰, no special lighting apparatus was required, and satisfactory results were obtained (i.e., there was no difference between the results from absorbance readings and color data extracted from a picture). Nevertheless, one might choose to use a platform to optimize picture acquisition, for example, using a transilluminator¹⁹^,²². The main issue is to assure a uniform background and lighting. Moreover, equivalent results can be obtained with different smartphone models. Despite slight differences in the signal obtained with each device, there are strong (Pearson's r > 0.99) and significant (p < 0.0001) correlations between four smartphone models tested (Samsung S22 Ultra, Apple iPhone 11, Apple iPhone 14 Pro, and XIAOMI Redmi Note 9 Pro). There are also significant correlations between the signal obtained with them and the signal from a plate reader (Supplementary Figure 1). In the case of color data extraction, care must be taken when using the ReadPlate plugin, especially in the grid check-up step, when one must inspect whether the grid fits the position of each well. One should make sure that the grid circles do not include the walls of the wells or an abnormal area (e.g., an area with a light reflection). Grid alignment can be especially difficult if the plate in the picture is not perpendicularly positioned to the background, which will make it difficult to properly draw a center-to-center rectangular selection of wells (from the upper-left to lower-right corner).

The advantages of the RGBradford method, compared with the conventional spectroscopical readings, are the same as other methods that use smartphones instead of specialized devices (e.g., microplate readers). Smartphones are widely available, cheaper than spectrophotometers, function on battery for hours, have data storage capacity, and communicate wirelessly and remotely with other devices. Altogether, these allow the use of the Bradford protein assay in remote locations or non-standard laboratory conditions, such as point-of-care units, classrooms, field expeditions, and low-resource communities. The captured picture can then be further analyzed and interpreted later.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil) [grant numbers 428048/2018-8 and 402556/2022-4] and the University of Brasilia (Brazil). The author thanks Dr. Duarte Nuno Carvalho and Dr. Evelyn Santos (i3s, Porto, Portugal) for providing access to their smartphones used in this research.

Materials

96-well flat-bottom polystyrene microtiter plates	Jet Biofil, Guangzhou, China	TCP011096	Any flat-bottom microplate compativle with optical reading will suffice.
Bovine serum albumin	Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO	A2153
Coomassie Brilliant Blue G	Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO	B0770
Ethyl alcohol
iPhone 11	Apple	MWM02BR/A	Can be substituted with other smartphone equiped with a camera
iPhone 14 Pro	Apple	N/A
Phosphoric acid	Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO	695017
Redmi Note 9 Pro	XIAOMI	N/A
S22 Ultra	Samsung	N/A
SpectraMax 384 Plus. Microplate reader.	Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA	PLUS 384	Any microplate reader capable of reading at 450 nm and 590 nm will work. This is optional. The method was actually created to dismiss the need of a microplate reader.

References

Zaguri, M., Kandel, S., Rinehart, S. A., Torsekar, V. R., Hawlena, D. Protein quantification in ecological studies: A literature review and empirical comparisons of standard methodologies. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12 (7), 1240-1251 (2021).
Koga, T., et al. Mild electrical stimulation and heat shock ameliorates progressive proteinuria and renal inflammation in mouse model of Alport syndrome. PLoS One. 7 (8), e43852 (2012).
Peterson, G. L. Determination of total protein. Methods in Enzymology. 91, 95-119 (1983).
Goldfarb, A. R., Saidel, L. J., Mosovich, E. The ultraviolet absorption spectra of proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193 (1), 397-404 (1951).
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., Randall, R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193 (1), 265-275 (1951).
Smith, P. K., et al. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Analytical Biochemistry. 150 (1), 76-85 (1985).
Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 72 (1-2), 248-254 (1976).
Datki, Z., et al. Application of BisANS fluorescent dye for developing a novel protein assay. PLoS One. 14 (4), e0215863 (2019).
Van Noorden, R., Maher, B., Nuzzo, R. The top 100 papers. Nature. 514 (7524), 550-553 (2014).
. Scopus Available from: https://www.scopus.com/ (2022)
Compton, S. J., Jones, C. G. Mechanism of dye response and interference in the Bradford protein assay. Analytical Biochemistry. 151 (2), 369-374 (1985).
Chial, H. J., Thompson, H. B., Splittgerber, A. G. A spectral study of the charge forms of Coomassie Blue G. Analytical Biochemistry. 209 (2), 258-266 (1993).
Pande, S. V., Murthy, M. S. R. A modified micro-Bradford procedure for elimination of interference from sodium dodecyl sulfate, other detergents, and lipids. Analytical Biochemistry. 220 (2), 424-426 (1994).
Gogstad, G. O., Krutnes, M. -. B. Measurement of protein in cell suspensions using the Commassie brilliant blue dye-binding assay. Analytical Biochemistry. 126 (2), 355-359 (1982).
Friedenauer, S., Berlet, H. H. Sensitivity and variability of the Bradford protein assay in the presence of detergents. Analytical Biochemistry. 178 (2), 263-268 (1989).
Stoscheck, C. M. Increased uniformity in the response of the Coomassie blue G protein assay to different proteins. Analytical Biochemistry. 184 (1), 111-116 (1990).
Zor, T., Selinger, Z. Linearization of the Bradford protein assay increases its sensitivity: Theoretical and experimental studies. Analytical Biochemistry. 236 (2), 302-308 (1996).
Gee, C. T., Kehoe, E., Pomerantz, W. C. K., Penn, R. L. Quantifying protein concentrations using smartphone colorimetry: A new method for an established test. Journal of Chemical Education. 94 (7), 941-945 (2017).
de Camargo, C., Vicentini, M., Gobbi, A., Martinez, D., Lima, R. Smartphone for point-of-care quantification of protein by Bradford assay. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society. 28 (4), 689-693 (2016).
Moreira, D. C. RGBradford: Accurate measurement of protein concentration using a smartphone camera and the blue to green intensity ratio. Analytical Biochemistry. 655, 114839 (2022).
Ernst, O., Zor, T. Linearization of the Bradford Protein Assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (38), 1918 (2010).
Angelani, C. R., et al. A metabolic control analysis approach to introduce the study of systems in biochemistry: the glycolytic pathway in the red blood cell: Metabolic control analysis and the glycolytic pathway. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 46 (5), 502-515 (2018).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite This Article

Moreira, D. C. RGBradford: Protein Quantitation with a Smartphone Camera. J. Vis. Exp. (199), e65547, doi:10.3791/65547 (2023).

Automatically Generated