We describe a dramatically improved method for mouse cloning using trichostatin A, vitamin C, and deionized bovine serum albumin. We show a simplified, reproducible protocol that supports efficient development of cloned embryos. Hence, this method could become a standardized procedure for mouse cloning.
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) provides a unique opportunity to directly produce a cloned animal from a donor cell, and it requires the use of skillful techniques. Additionally, the efficiencies of cloning have remained low since the successful production of cloned animals, especially mice. There have been many attempts to improve the cloning efficiency, and trichostatin A (TSA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has been widely used to enhance the efficiency of cloning. Here, we report a dramatically improved cloning method in mice. This somatic cell nuclear transfer method involves usage of Hemagglutinating virus of Japan Envelope (HVJ-E), which enables easy manipulation. Moreover, the treatment using two small molecules, TSA and vitamin C (VC), with deionized bovine serum albumin (dBSA), is highly effective for embryonic development. This approach requires neither additional injection nor genetic manipulation, and thus presents a simple, suitable method for practical use. This method could become a technically feasible approach for researchers to produce genetically modified animals from cultured cells. Furthermore, it might be a useful way for the rescue of endangered animals via cloning.
The SCNT technology enables the production of cloned animals by using only one somatic cell or a nucleus to be transferred to an enucleated oocyte. One of the purposes of the SCNT technique is the derivation of nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells (NT-ESCs) lines from cloned embryos. In 1998, Wakayama et al., reported producing a successfully cloned mouse named Cumulina for the first time1. Since then, the cloning of mice has been widely studied, and many important insights into nuclear reprogramming of somatic nuclei have been obtained. On the other hand, this technique is accompanied by numerous micromanipulation steps which are quite difficult to master, requiring intensive training of more than 3 months2.
Production of cloned mice using SCNT has evolved from the original Honolulu method1, the electrofusion method3, to the cell fusion method by Hemagglutinating virus of Japan (HVJ)4. However, the direct injection of a cell nucleus through the cytomembrane tends to detrimentally affect oocyte survival. The electrofusion is low in efficiency, since each cell membrane has different hardness, making it difficult to determine an optimal condition. The handling of HVJ is laborious because it requires specific equipment for the safety of researchers and laboratory animals. Recently, to fuse the donor cell and oocyte cytoplasm, HVJ-E has been used5. HVJ-E only has the ability to fuse membranes without the proliferative or infectious ability of viruses. Genomic RNAs of HVJ are completely inactivated in HVJ-E. The usage of HVJ-E thus supports easy handling of cell fusion during SCNT.
Several reports have shown that the treatment of SCNT embryos with TSA, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, significantly improves the production efficiency of live pups from less than 1% to 6.5%6,7. TSA treatment accelerates reprogramming through modifying histone marks in SCNT embryos8. Recently, injection of particular mRNAs, the histone lysine demethylase subfamily 4 (KDM4), which remove histone H3 lysin 9 (H3K9) trimethylation in SCNT embryos, especially at reprograming-resistant regions, has been shown to increase development of cloned mouse embryos9. Meanwhile, VC, which also serves as a histone modifier, has decreased trimethylation of H3K910. Furthermore, VC enhances embryonic development in porcine SCNT10. It has been reported that the injection of dBSA into SCNT embryos leads to the improvement of embryonic development11.
We previously found that the combination of small molecules, namely TSA and VC, together with dBSA, dramatically enhanced development of SCNT embryos12. Here, we detail the previously reported SCNT method for mice, which represents highly efficient and simple cloning procedures12. We also describe the handling of HVJ-E. These could help many researchers in the field of developmental and reproductive biology to preserve genetic resources or produce genetically modified animals through this SCNT method.
All animal procedures conformed to the guidelines of Kindai University for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
1. Preparation of Culture Media
2. Preparation of Deionized Bovine Serum Albumin (dBSA)
3. Oocyte Collection
NOTE: All mice were maintained in light-controlled and air-conditioned rooms.
4. Preparation of Donor Cells for Nuclear Transfer
5. Enucleation of Oocytes
6. Fusion of a Donor Cell and an Enucleated Oocyte
7. Activation of the Reconstructed Oocytes and Treatment with Trichostatin A and Vitamin C
To produce cloned mouse embryos, cumulus cells and fetal fibroblast cells were used. The number of reconstructed oocytes and development to the 2-cell stage after oocyte activation are shown in Table 1. A very high rate of pronuclear formation (89 to 100%) and development to the 2-cell stage (77 to 89%) were observed under all conditions. Some of cloned embryos, which were derived from the cumulus cells and developed to the 2-cell stage, were transferred to oviducts of pseudo-pregnant females. Six cloned offspring out of 72 transferred embryos were produced from three pregnant females by the serial treatment of TSA and VC (Figure 4). Approximately 15% of cloned embryos have been reported to develop to term by following this SCNT procedures12. In addition, the transfer of cloned 2-cell embryos at other institutions has achieved 9 to 15% live offspring, which represents better development than the single TSA treatment on cloned embryos. Moreover, the treatment with TSA and VC significantly improved the efficiency of in vitro embryonic development to the blastocyst stage (Table 2, P <0.05, Student's t-test). These in vitro developmental data demonstrate that the positive effect of TSA and VC is limited neither by mouse strains nor by cell types. These results suggest that this SCNT method facilitates developmental ability of the cloned embryos.
Figure 1: Preparation of dBSA.
Step-by-step procedures for preparing dBSA solution are depicted. The extent of ion exchange can be judged by the color change of the beads. The upper left figure shows that 1.2 g of BSA is dissolved in 10 mL of sterile water at room temperature. After BSA is dissolved, the ion-exchange resin beads are added (upper right). When the mixture of BSA solution with ion-exchange resin beads change color from blue-green to gold (bottom right), replace the beads with fresh ones. The bottom-left figure shows that the color of beads remains blue-green, and ion exchange is finished. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Enucleation procedures.
(A) An illustration of the enucleation chamber. Enucleation of oocytes is performed in the HCZB medium with CB. For the piezo driving system, a spot of 9% PVP medium is used to prepare the glass pipette for enucleation. Spots are covered by mineral oil. (B) A diagram and a micrograph show the position of the spindles and chromosomes before enucleation. Black arrowheads: the spindles and chromosomes. Red arrowheads: the first polar body. (C) A diagram and a micrograph to show successful enucleation. Black arrowheads: the spindles and chromosomes. Red arrowhead: the first polar body. Blue arrowhead: the hole in zona pellucida. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Cell fusion procedures and culture condition of SCNT embryos.
(A) An illustration of the cell fusion chamber. Cell fusion is performed in the HCZB medium containing 6% dBSA. A spot of 9% PVP medium is used to prepare the glass pipette for cell fusion. Spots are covered by mineral oil. (B) A diagram and a micrograph of the premature chromosome condensation formed one hour after cell fusion (black arrowhead). (C) A diagram and a micrograph of the pronuclear structure formed six hours after activation (black arrowheads). (D) Scheme of the TSA, VC, and dBSA treatment for SCNT embryos. Green arrow represents treatment with TSA, followed by incubation with VC (yellow arrow) under mKSOM medium containing with 0.3% dBSA (blue arrow). Arrow heads indicate the timing for changing medium. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Cloned offspring derived from cumulus cells just after caesarean section after 19.5 days of pregnancy.
There are placentae at the top row. The cloned offspring shown here were generated in one nuclear transfer experiment from three foster mothers. The placenta size was 1.5 to 2 times bigger than the size of those produced by in vitro fertilization. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Group | Donor cell type | Mouse strain | No. of oocytes used | No. of oocytes fused | No. of oocytes showing premature chromosome condensation | No. of oocytes showing pronuclei formation (%) | No. of pronuclei-formed oocytes that developed to 2-cell embryos (%) |
|
TSA, VC | cumulus | C57BL/6× DBA/2 | 84 | 82 | 82 | 81 (99) | 72 (89) | |
untreated | cumulus | C57BL/6× DBA/2 | 84 | 82 | 82 | 82 (100) | 68 (83) | |
TSA, VC | fetal fibroblast | MCH(ICR)×MCH(ICR) | 202 | 171 | 169 | 151 (89) | 124 (82) | |
untreated | fetal fibroblast | MCH(ICR)×MCH(ICR) | 201 | 171 | 147 | 142 (97) | 109 (77) |
Table 1: Effects of the TSA and VC treatment on the in vitro development of cloned mouse embryos to the 2-cell stage.
Group | Donor cell type | Mouse strain | No. of 2-cell embryos used | No. of 2-cell embryos developed to each stages (%) | |||
4-cell | morula | blastocyst | |||||
TSA, VC | cumulus | C57BL/6× DBA/2 | 152 | 152 (100) | 149 (98) | 135 (89) a | |
untreated | cumulus | C57BL/6× DBA/2 | 83 | 47 (57) | 41 (49) | 32 (39) b | |
TSA, VC | fetal fibroblast | MCH(ICR)×MCH(ICR) | 124 | 110 (89) | 101 (81) | 88 (71) c | |
untreated | fetal fibroblast | MCH(ICR)×MCH(ICR) | 109 | 54 (50) | 45 (41) | 29 (27) d | |
a-b, c-d Different superscripts within the same donor cells represent significant differences (P < 0.05) |
Table 2: Effects of the TSA and VC treatment on the in vitro development of cloned mouse embryos to the blastocyst stage.
In conclusion, these results suggest that the presented SCNT method could reduce technical difficulties, and increase the efficiency of SCNT without requiring genetic modifications and mRNA supplementation (Table 1, Table 2), and ensure stable production of cloned embryos. This method enables us to reconstruct more SCNT embryos than conventional methods due to the better survival rate and simplified protocol. In this protocol, one critical step is cell fusion. To successfully produce cloned mice, it is vital to ensure that the proper amount of HVJ-E described in the protocol is maintained during the cell fusion process and oocytes need to be returned to the incubator within 10 min during the steps 6.2.3 – 6.2.5. Since 20 to 30 donor cells can be aspirated together with HVJ-E at a time in the manipulation pipette, the number of oocytes obtained by one operation is larger than that of the existing method. In the end, we can produce about 20 to 30 re-constructed oocytes within 10 min. Even when working with a large batch of oocytes (100 or more), the cell fusion procedure should take an hour or less by repeating the steps 6.2.3 – 6.2.5. The method and techniques presented here can serve as efficient protocols with simplified technical requirements.
At present, the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of SCNT embryos are still unclear. This improved SCNT method also contributes to studying such reprogramming mechanisms, since this method can produce many cloned embryos in only one experiment. This method uses somatic cells with intact cell membranes for cell fusion. Thus, it may be possible to apply this approach to other cells such as tail tip cells16, sertoli cells17, and embryonic stem (ES) cells18. When conventional SCNT methods are used for injecting relatively large cells, such as tail tip cells, directly into the oocyte cytoplasm, it becomes even more technically demanding to obtain live embryos. In addition, relatively hard cells, such as sertoli cells, are difficult to break by pipetting for injecting. When these various cell types are considered, the cell fusion method utilizing HVJ-E is simple and effective. Although the value and safety of HVJ-E have been convincingly demonstrated19,20, it might be important to re-consider the feasibility of using HVJ-E for producing cloned animals for agricultural or biomedical purposes.
Moreover, recently one group successfully produced cloned mice derived from urine cells21. To rescue endangered mammalian species, henceforth SCNT using the cells collected in a non-invasive manner, such as the urine cell, will be ideal. More recently, another group has directly generated cloned mice using antigen-specific CD4+ T cells22. It would be interesting to examine if this method is also applicable to efficiently clone mice from such cells. Furthermore, Latrunculin A has been reported as a better alternative for inhibiting actin polymerization during enucleation and parthenogenetic activation of SCNT oocytes23. Future study may reveal whether the Latrunculin A treatment, instead of cytochalasin B, further improves generation of cloned offspring. Additionally, the TSA treatment has been successfully used in mice, pigs24, and rabbits25 by changing treatment time, period, and concentration. Furthermore, VC not only enhances embryonic development in porcine SCNT10, but also improves iPS cell production in humans and mice26. Thus, it is plausible to speculate that TSA and VC treatment can also be applied to other mammalian species, and we may need to optimize the treatment time of TSA and VC for each species.
In conclusion, this method would make it possible to generate cloned mice with a practical level of efficiency with simple procedures. Therefore, the results of this study could lead us to use the SCNT technology for preserving the genetic resources of rare animals, and for understanding the molecular mechanisms of nuclear reprogramming and early embryonic development.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP15H06753, JP16H01321, JP16H01222, JP17H05045 to K.M. Sumitomo Foundation Grant for Basic Science Research Projects (150810 to K.M.). Kindai University Research Grant (15-I-2 to K.M. and M.A.). M.O. acknowledge the core support provided by Cancer Research UK (C6946/A24843) and the Wellcome Trust (203144/Z/16/Z). We thank Ms. N. Backes-Kamimura and Mr. J. Horvat for proof reading.
NaCl | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | 28-2270-5 | For medium |
KCl | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 169-03542 | For medium |
KH2PO4 | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 165-04242 | For medium |
MgSO4 · 7H2O | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 137-00402 | For medium |
CaCl2 · 2H2O | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 039-00431 | For medium |
D(+)-Glucose | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 041-00595 | For medium |
Sodium Pyruvate | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 199-03062 | For medium |
L-Glutamine | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | G3126 | For medium |
Polyvinylpyrrolidone | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 168-17042 | For medium |
NaHCO3 | Nacalai tesque, Inc. | 31213-15 | For medium |
Sodium DL-Lactate | Nacalai tesque, Inc. | 31605-72 | For medium |
Penicillin | Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. | 4987222637671 (GTIN-13) | For medium |
Streptomycin | Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. | 4987222665643 (GTIN-13) | For medium |
Sterile water, endotoxin free | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 196-15645 | For medium |
EDTA · 2Na | Dojindo Lab. | 345-01865 | For medium |
Phenol red | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | P0290 | For medium |
HEPES sodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | H3784 | For medium |
Polyvinyl alcohol | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | P8136 | For medium |
Bovine serum albumin | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | A3311 | For medium |
BT AG 501-X8 (D) Resin | Bio-Rad Lab., Inc. | 143-7425 | For preparation of dBSA |
Hyaluronidase | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | H3506 | For collection of oocytes and cumulus cells |
Cytochalasin B | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 034-17554 | For enucleation and oocytes activation |
Piezo micro manipulator | Prime tech, Co., Ltd. | PMM-150FU | For micromanipulation |
HVJ Envelope Cell Fusion Kit GenomONE-CF | Ishihara sangyo kaisha, Ltd. | CF001 | Containing 0.5 mL of HVJ-E suspension solution and 10 mL of cell fusion buffer for cell fusion |
SrCl2 · 6H2O | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 193-09442 | For oocytes activation |
EGTA | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | E8145 | For oocytes activation |
Dimethyl sulfoxide | Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 045-24511 | For solvent |
Trichostatin A | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | T1952 | For incubating with SCNT embryos |
L-Ascorbic acid | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | A5960 | For incubating with SCNT embryos |
Mineral oil | Sigma-Aldrich, Co., Lcc. | M8410 | For covering medium |