Summary

In Vitro Chemical Mapping of G-Quadruplex DNA Structures by Bis-3-Chloropiperidines

Published: May 12, 2023
doi:

Summary

Bis-3-chloropiperidines (B-CePs) are useful chemical probes to identify and characterize G-quadruplex structures in DNA templates in vitro. This protocol details the procedure to perform probing reactions with B-CePs and to resolve reaction products by high-resolution polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Abstract

G-quadruplexes (G4s) are biologically relevant, non-canonical DNA structures that play an important role in gene expression and diseases, representing significant therapeutic targets. Accessible methods are required for the in vitro characterization of DNA within potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences (PQSs). B-CePs are a class of alkylating agents that have proven to be useful chemical probes for investigation of the higher-order structure of nucleic acids. This paper describes a new chemical mapping assay exploiting the specific reactivity of B-CePs with the N7 of guanines, followed by direct strand cleavage at the alkylated Gs.

Namely, to distinguish G4 folds from unfolded DNA forms, we use B-CeP 1 to probe the thrombin-binding aptamer (TBA), a 15-mer DNA able to assume the G4 arrangement. Reaction of B-CeP-responding guanines with B-CeP 1 yields products that can be resolved by high-resolution polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) at a single-nucleotide level by locating individual alkylation adducts and DNA strand cleavage at the alkylated guanines. Mapping using B-CePs is a simple and powerful tool for the in vitro characterization of G-quadruplex-forming DNA sequences, enabling the precise location of guanines involved in the formation of G-tetrads.

Introduction

In addition to the typical Watson-Crick double helix, nucleic acids can adopt various secondary structures, such as the alternative G-quadruplex (G4) form, due to their guanine-rich sequences. G4 structure is based on the formation of planar tetramers, called G-tetrads, in which four guanines interact through Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds. G-tetrads are stacked and further stabilized by monovalent cations that are coordinated in the center of the guanine core (Figure 1)1.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Schematic representation of a G-quadruplex structure. (A) Schematic representation of a G-tetrad. The planar array is stabilized by Hoogsteen base-pairing and by a central cation (M+). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Sequences with four or more runs of at least two consecutive guanine nucleotides are potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences (PQSs) that can fold in G-quadruplex structures. PQSs are located in many different cellular contexts, such as at telomeres, gene promoters, ribosomal DNA, and recombination sites, and are involved in the regulation of many biological processes2. Hence, the identification and experimental validation of G4s in the human genome, which is currently performed primarily through computational tools, is a biologically relevant issue3. In order to support computational predictions or detect unpredicted G4 structures, an accessible method based on chemical mapping to identify the G4 formation in a DNA template is shown here, enabling the precise identification of guanines forming the G-tetrad structure.

The reported chemical mapping assay exploits the different reactivity of bis-3-chloropiperidines (B-CePs) with guanines following the formation of G4 structures. Due to their high reactivity with nucleophiles4,5,6,7,8,9, B-CePs are nucleic acid-alkylating agents with the ability to react very efficiently with the N7 position of guanine nucleotides10. Alkylation is followed by depurination and strand cleavage in single- and double-stranded DNA constructs. On the contrary, guanines involved in the formation of the G-tetrads in G4 arrangements are impervious to B-CeP alkylation, as the N7 position of guanines is implicated in the Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds. This specific reactivity of B-CePs allows not only the detection of G4 structures, but also the identification of the guanines forming the tetrad(s), as they can be deduced from their relative protection from alkylation compared with guanines in single- and double-stranded DNA.

The chemical mapping protocol is reported here using B-CeP 1 (Figure 2A) as a probe for the characterization of thrombin-binding aptamer (TBA), a 15-mer DNA able to assume the G4 arrangement in the presence of potassium cations11,12. The G4 arrangement of TBA (G4-TBA) is directly compared with two controls, namely TBA in the single-stranded form (ssTBA) and TBA annealed to its complementary sequence to form the double-stranded construct (dsTBA) (Table 1). Products of probing reactions are resolved by high-resolution polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) at the single-nucleotide level by locating individual alkylation adducts and DNA strand cleavage at the alkylated guanines. Visualization on the gel is enabled by conjugation of the TBA oligonucleotide with a fluorophore at its 3'-end (Table 1). This protocol shows how to fold TBA in its different conformations (G4 and controls), and how to perform probing reactions with B-CePs followed by PAGE.

Protocol

1. Nucleic acid and chemical probe preparation

  1. Nucleic acids
    NOTE: The oligonucleotide named "TBA" is the 15-mer DNA sequence 5'-GGT-TGG-TGT-GGT-TGG-3' labeled at the 3'-end by the fluorophore 5-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) to enable visualization on the gel. The unlabeled oligonucleotide "cTBA" is its DNA complementary sequence 5'-CCA-ACC-ACA-CCA-ACC-3'. TBA and cTBA are employed to obtain the three different structures, as shown in Table 1.
    1. Autoclave tips and 0.5 mL tubes in order to obtain sterile disposables and avoid contamination.
    2. Prepare stock solutions solubilizing each oligonucleotide in ultrapure water to a final concentration of 100 µM. Determine the exact oligonucleotide concentration with a ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer, using the extinction coefficient at 260 nm provided by the manufacturer.
      NOTE: Extinction coefficients: 164,300 M-1 cm-1 and 138,600 M-1 cm-1 were used for TBA and cTBA, respectively.
    3. Store TBA and cTBA stock solutions at -20 °C (for months in these conditions).
  2. Compound B-CeP 1
    NOTE: The compound B-CeP 1 is synthesized as previously reported6.
    1. Prepare the B-CeP 1 stock solution at ~10 mM. Weigh ~1 mg of the lyophilized compound using an analytical balance located in a fume hood and solubilize it in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
    2. Calculate the exact compound concentration based on the actual amount of compound and DMSO (d = 1.1 g/cm3) used.
      NOTE: Handle the compound with gloves at all times (both when lyophilized and when dissolved in DMSO)13,14.

Table 1: Oligonucleotide structures used in this protocol. Please click here to download this Table.

2. Folding of nucleic acid constructs

  1. Preparation of buffers
    1. Prepare a BPE buffer solution (biphosphate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA], 5x: 2 mM NaH2PO4, 6 mM Na2HPO4, 1 mM Na2EDTA, pH 7.4) and a solution of 500 mM KCl in ultrapure water. Filter the solutions through 0.22 µm pore size filters.
      NOTE: For best results, use freshly prepared solutions. BPE buffer can be stored at 4 °C for up to 15 days.
  2. Folding of G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA samples by the heat-refolding procedure
    NOTE: Potassium cations are necessary to fold the G4 structure (G4-TBA). Do not add potassium cations in the folding solution of the controls ssTBA and dsTBA.
    1. Prepare 40 µL of a 4 µM solution of G4-TBA in 1x BPE and 100 mM KCl. Denature the oligonucleotide G4-TBA solution by heating the tube to 95 °C for 5 min and slowly cool it down to room temperature (RT) to allow the TBA to fold into G-quadruplexes.
    2. Prepare 40 µL of a 4 µM solution of ssTBA in 1x BPE. Perform the heat-refolding procedure, as mentioned in step 2.2.1, to fold TBA in its single-stranded form.
    3. Prepare 40 µL of a 4 µM solution of dsTBA by mixing equimolar amounts of TBA and cTBA in 1x BPE. Perform the heat-refolding procedure as mentioned above (step 2.2.1) for TBA to anneal to its complementary sequence cTBA and form the double-stranded form of TBA.
      NOTE: The final volume of each folding solution is based on the number of samples for the probing reactions, considering that 5 µL of 4 µM solution will be needed for each sample. Prepare a little excess volume of each solution to avoid pipetting errors.

3. Probing reactions

NOTE: Probing reactions must be done immediately after the heat-refolding procedure.

  1. When the folding solutions of G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA have cooled to RT, perform a short-spin centrifugation (7,000 × g for 5-8 s at RT) and start the probing reactions.
  2. Prepare 21 empty 0.5 mL autoclaved tubes. Organize them in three sets of seven tubes each in the rack for lab samples, as reported in Table 2.
    NOTE: Each column set corresponds to the three different TBA folding conditions G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA. Each row corresponds to three different incubation times. Each cell within the column corresponds to the final B-CeP 1 probe concentration (Table 2). Make sure to clearly label the tubes.
  3. Add 3 µL of ultrapure water in each tube.
  4. Add 5 µL of folded G4-TBA in each tube of the first set (step 3.2). Add 5 µL of folded ssTBA in each tube of the second set. Add 5 µL of folded dsTBA in each tube of the third set.
  5. Dilute the B-CeP 1 stock solution to 250 µM and 25 µM in ultrapure water.
    NOTE: Dilutions of the B-CeP 1 chemical probe must be freshly prepared and immediately reacted with the DNA substrate to avoid competing reactions with water.
  6. Add 2 µL of the appropriate B-CeP 1 dilution (25 µM and 250 µM) to the samples. Replace the compound with ultrapure water in the three control samples (C) for analysis of the differently folded TBAs in the absence of the compound. Incubate all the samples at 37 °C.
  7. After 1 h, 4 h, and 15 h of incubation, stop the reaction by placing the tubes at -20 °C until the next step.
    NOTE: The samples can be stored in these conditions for a couple of days.
  8. Dry the samples in a vacuum centrifuge.
    NOTE: The dried samples can be stored at -20 °C for weeks before proceeding with the PAGE analysis.

Table 2: Samples for the probing reactions (structures, probe concentrations, and incubation time). Each column set corresponds to the three different TBA folding conditions (G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA). Each row corresponds to three different incubation times (1, 4, 15 h). Each cell within the column corresponds to the final B-CeP 1 probe concentration (5 or 50 µM). The control (C) for each set corresponds to a sample of the differently folded TBAs incubated for the longer time (15 h) in the absence of compound. Please click here to download this Table.

4. High-resolution PAGE

  1. Preparation of the denaturing polyacrylamide solution
    NOTE: Prepare in advance 500 mL of 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel solution. Around 80 mL of this solution will be used for each experiment. Use an amber glass bottle or cover a glass bottle with aluminum foil to store the solution at RT.
    CAUTION: Polyacrylamide is neurotoxic. During all steps of gel preparation and pouring, wear gloves and a lab coat. Discard polymerized acrylamide in an appropriate box for contaminated materials.
    1. Weigh 210 g of urea in a 1 L beaker. Add 250 mL of 40% acrylamide/bisacrylamide (19/1) solution and 50 mL of 10x TBE (890 mM Tris-HCl, 890 mM borate, 20 mM EDTA, pH 8).
    2. Place the beaker on a stir plate and mix the solution with a stirring rod. Cover the beaker with aluminum foil during mixing to prevent splashing and contamination.
    3. Mix the solution until the urea is completely dissolved and the solution is clear.
      NOTE: This step can take many hours. To promote the dissolution of urea, add a small aliquot of water without going beyond the desired final volume.
    4. Remove the stirring rod. Pour the solution in a cylinder and add water to an exact final volume of 500 mL.
  2. Setting up of gel apparatus
    1. Clean two plates (one notched and one unnotched) with 70% ethanol, let them dry, and then treat the plates with a dimethyldichlorosilane solution.
      NOTE: Silanization can be skipped, although it helps the release of the gel from one of the plates when the gel sandwich is taken apart.
      CAUTION: Handle the silanization solution with gloves and carry out the plate treatment with this solution in a fume hood.
    2. Place the 0.4 mm spacers along the long edges of the longer plate, place the short plate on top of the other, and align the two plates at the bottom.
    3. Place multiple layers of paper tape along all the edges except for the top.
    4. To avoid leaks during casting, add an additional layer of tape to the bottom of the gel.
    5. Clip the sides of the glass sandwich with clean clamps following the supplier's instructions (different suppliers use slightly different apparatus, sandwich clamps, and gaskets).
  3. Pouring the gel
    NOTE: Pour the gel at RT (25 °C), since polyacrylamide polymerization is temperature-sensitive.
    1. In a beaker, pour 80 mL of the previously prepared denaturing polyacrylamide solution (step 4.1), 450 µL of a 10% m/V ammonium persulphate (APS) solution, and 45 µL of tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) immediately before use.
    2. Mix the solution and rapidly pour it down between the glass plates using a 50 mL syringe. Introduce the comb with the desired number of wells between the glass plates, avoiding bubbles. Add gel solution to fill the sandwich completely, if necessary. Place four clamps on the comb to press down and allow for even distribution of the wells.
    3. Let the gel polymerize for at least 45 min.
  4. Running the gel
    1. After the polymerization, remove all the clamps and paper tape layers. Remove the comb slowly and thoroughly rinse the wells with distilled water.
    2. Follow the instructions from the specific supplier to correctly place the gel sandwich in the vertical gel electrophoresis apparatus.
    3. Prepare TBE running buffer (1x: 89 mM Tris-HCl, 89 mM borate, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8) in deionized water and fill both the top and bottom reservoirs with the buffer.
    4. Warm up the plates by performing a pre-run of the gel electrophoresis for at least 30 min at 50 W.
    5. Prepare denaturing gel loading buffer (DGLB: 1 M Tris-HCl, 80% formamide, 50% glycerol, 0.05% bromophenol blue) in ultrapure water.
      NOTE: GLB helps to track the oligonucleotide samples' movement into the gel system and allows to load the samples into the gel's wells. The presence of the denaturing agent formamide allows DNA species to separate according to size, even in a non-denaturing PAGE.
    6. Resuspend the dried samples (samples from step 3.8) in 5 µL of DGLB.
    7. Before loading the samples, clean the wells using a small syringe and the TBE buffer in the upper buffer chamber to remove the urea from the wells.
      NOTE: Repeat this step several times to accurately clean the wells, thus avoiding bands difficult to be interpreted.
    8. Load the samples into the clean wells and make a note of the order of loading.
    9. Run the gel electrophoresis for 2 h at 50 W, or at least until the bromophenol blue dye has run 2/3 down the gel.
  5. Imaging the gel
    1. After electrophoresis, turn off the power supply, remove the glass sandwich, and clean the glasses.
    2. Detect the fluorescence of the FAM-labeled oligonucleotide bands by scanning using a gel imager.

Representative Results

Figure 2 shows a representative result of a chemical mapping assay performed, as described in the protocol with B-CeP 1 on the TBA oligonucleotide folded in three different structures. The G-quadruplex arrangement of TBA (G4-TBA) was obtained by folding the oligonucleotide in BPE and in the presence of the K+ cation, whereas the single-stranded form of the same TBA sequence (ssTBA) was folded in the absence of potassium. The double-stranded construct (dsTBA) was prepared by annealing TBA to its complementary sequence in BPE buffer. Either a 5 or 50 µM final concentration of B-CeP 1 was reacted with 2 µM samples of G4-TBA (left lanes of Figure 2B), ssTBA (central lanes of Figure 2B), and dsTBA (right lanes of Figure 2B) for 1 h, 4 h, and 15 h. Additional controls are the DNA constructs not reacted with the probe. Circular dichroism (CD) analysis of the three different TBA foldings confirmed their proper structure (Supplementary Figure S1). The CD spectrum of dsTBA was in fact characterized by a positive long wavelength band at ~260-280 nm and a negative band at ~245 nm15, consistently with a the DNA helix in its B-form. The ssTBA was found to be poorly structured in the absence of K+ ions, whereas G4-TBA folds in an anti-parallel G4 in the presence of K+ ions, characterized by a negative band at 260 nm and a positive band at 290 nm15.

The high-resolution PAGE results reported in Figure 2B provide a comprehensive view of the time- and concentration-dependent reactions of B-CeP 1 toward G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA, clearly revealing a markedly different alkylation pattern for the G4-TBA in comparison to what was observed for the ssTBA and dsTBA constructs. Bands migrating with lower mobility than the untreated samples (C) are consistent with DNA substrate alkylation. In the case of the G4-TBA substrate, only one alkylation adduct is clearly observed, according to the presence of only one guanine (G8) available for alkylation (numbering of guanines in Figure 2C). On the contrary, multiple adducts are distinguished when the substrate is either ssTBA or dsTBA, with all guanines possessing the N7 position free to be probed. Faster-migrating bands are instead ascribed to the products of strand cleavage. In the case of the G4-TBA substrate, the guanines (G1, G2, G5, G6, G10, G11, G14, G15) involved in G-quadruplex tetrads are impervious to alkylation, whereas G8 is affected by cleavage as a following step of alkylation. In the ssTBA and dsTBA constructs, all guanines are susceptible to cleavage, as demonstrated by the numerous bands detected, which become progressively more intense at longer incubation times.

This protocol allows for discrimination between the guanines involved in the formation of the G-quadruplex tetrads and the guanines that are not implicated in such arrangement, thus elucidating the G4-TBA structure (Figure 2C).

A possible drawback of the experiment is the presence of undesired nucleophiles in the reaction environment. For example, nucleophiles deriving from salts in the reaction buffer compete with DNA for the reactivity with B-CePs, leading to inefficient reaction of the probe with the substrate. Figure 3 shows the results of the probing reactions performed in Tris buffer, which contain the nucleophilic Tris base. B-CeP 1 (5 and 50 µM) is reacted with 2 µM samples of G4-TBA (left lanes of Figure 3), ssTBA (central lanes of Figure 3), and dsTBA (right lanes of Figure 3) for 1 h, 4 h, 15 h, and 24 h. In these conditions, the reactivity of the probe toward all three DNA substrates is clearly diminished. For the G4-TBA samples, we can observe only the formation of adducts without detecting strand cleavage. In the cases of ssTBA and dsTBA, only after 24 h is the DNA fragmentation comparable to the one observed after 15 h of incubation in Figure 2B. The undesired competing reactivity of B-CePs with Tris leads to a lack of nucleic acid structural information.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Chemical mapping of a TBA G-quadruplex structure by B-CeP 1 in BPE buffer. (A) Chemical structure of B-CeP 1. (B) Time and concentration dependance of the probing reactions between B-CeP 1 and TBA in BPE buffer.Aliquots of TBA were folded in three different conditions in order to obtain the G-quadruplex arrangement (G4-TBA), the single-stranded oligonucleotide (ssTBA), and TBA annealed to its complementary sequence to form the double-stranded construct (dsTBA). The TBA oligonucleotide was labeled at the 3'-end with a fluorophore (FAM) to enable visualization on the gel system. Aliquots (2 µM) of G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA were treated with B-CeP 1 at either a 5 or 50 µM final concentration in BPE buffer and incubated at 37 °C for the indicated time. The outcome of the probing reactions was analyzed by high-resolution denaturing PAGE (20% polyacrylamide [PAA], 7 M urea, 1x TBE). "C" indicates the control sample of each TBA construct. (C) Cartoon of the G-quadruplex arrangement of G4-TBA and numbering of guanines in the TBA sequence. The only guanine that was not involved in the G4 structure, thus reacting with B-CeP 1, is highlighted in red. The green star represents the fluorophore FAM. Abbreviations: TBA = thrombin-binding aptamer; B-CeP 1 = bis-3-chloropiperidine 1; BPE = biphosphate-EDTA; G = guanine; G4 = guanine quadruplex; ss = single-stranded; ds = double-stranded; FAM = 5-carboxyfluorescein; PAA = polyacrylamide; PAGE = polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; TBE = Tris-borate-EDTA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Inefficient chemical mapping in the presence of Tris buffer. Time and concentration dependence of the probing reactions between B-CeP 1 and TBA in Tris buffer. Aliquots of TBA were folded in three different conditions in order to obtain the G-quadruplex arrangement (G4-TBA), the single-stranded oligonucleotide (ssTBA), and TBA annealed to its complementary sequence to form the double-stranded construct (dsTBA). TBA oligonucleotide was labeled at the 3'-end with a fluorophore (FAM) to enable visualization on the gel system. Aliquots (2 µM) of G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA were treated with B-CeP 1 at either a 5 or 50 µM final concentration in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer and incubated at 37 °C for the indicated time. The outcome of the probing reactions was analyzed by high-resolution denaturing PAGE (20% PAA, 7 M urea, 1x TBE). "C" indicates the control sample of each TBA construct. The nucleophilicity of Tris used as buffer during the probing reactions leads to lower signals and a loss of structural information. Abbreviations: TBA = thrombin-binding aptamer; B-CeP 1 = bis-3-chloropiperidine 1; BPE = biphosphate-EDTA; G = guanine; G4 = guanine quadruplex; ss = single-stranded; ds = double-stranded; FAM = 5-carboxyfluorescein; PAA = polyacrylamide; PAGE = polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; TBE = Tris-borate-EDTA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Supplementary Figure S1: CD spectra of G4-TBA, ssTBA, and dsTBA. After the proper folding of the three different structures, CD spectra were recorded at 25 °C. The CD spectrum of dsTBA, characterized by positive long wavelength bands at ~260-280 nm and a negative band at ~245 nm16, is consistent with a B-form of the DNA helix. In comparison to the ssTBA, which was found to be poorly structured in the absence of K+ ions, G4-TBA folds in an anti-parallel G4 in the presence of K+ ions, characterized by a negative band at 260 nm and a positive band at 290 nm15. Abbreviations: TBA = thrombin-binding aptamer; B-CeP 1 = bis-3-chloropiperidine 1; BPE = biphosphate-EDTA; G = guanine; G4 = guanine quadruplex; ss = single-stranded; ds = double-stranded. Please click here to download this File.

Discussion

G-quadruplexes are nucleic acid secondary structures that typically fold within guanine-rich DNA sequences, and are significant research targets because of their association with genetic control and diseases. Chemical mapping by B-CePs is a useful protocol for the characterization of DNA G4s, which can be used to identify the guanine bases involved in the formation of G-tetrads under physiological salt conditions.

The chemical probe used in this protocol is B-CeP 1 (Figure 2A), which, by specifically reacting with the N7 of guanine nucleobases, can discriminate between the guanines involved in the formation of the G-quadruplex tetrads and the guanines that are not implicated in such an arrangement. In fact, Hoogsteen hydrogen interactions between the guanines in G-tetrads (Figure 1) impair the reaction with the probe. Products of probing reactions are resolved by high-resolution PAGE (Figure 2B), a lab-accessible procedure highly utilized to detect alkylation adducts and cleavage sites within DNA sequences. Moreover, the use of a DNA sequence labeled with a fluorophore allows users to perform the experiment in safe conditions, avoiding radioactively labelled nucleic acids and the conventional staining step with intercalators.

The B-CeP 1 probe is very stable in solid form and in non-aqueous stock solution, and only few problems can occur while performing the probing reaction. To avoid drawbacks in the protocol, it is very important to avoid the presence of undesired nucleophiles in the probing solutions to avoid competing reactions that could diminish the titer of the active probe available to form the adduct with the DNA. As most commonly used buffers contain Tris base, we remind the reader that its nucleophilic primary amine can react with the probe electrophilic center competing out the reactivity of the guanines of the DNA substrate10, as shown in Figure 3 for B-CeP 1. This is the rationale for performing the probing reactions in phosphate buffer, as detailed in the protocol. To avoid reactions with water7, we also recommend that all dilutions of B-CeP 1 are freshly prepared and instantly reacted with the nucleic acid substrate.

The chemical mapping by B-CePs described here is a convenient alternative to the dimethyl sulfate (DMS) footprinting protocol, which represents the mainstream assay for the initial characterization of G4s16. The two protocols give basically the same information, namely the formation of the G4 structure and the identification of the guanines involved in the G4, regardless of the G4 conformation. However, the chemical mapping with B-CePs possesses a key advantage with respect to DMS footprinting-the simplicity of the protocol. After the probing reactions, the protocol described here does not need additional steps, whereas DMS footprinting needs subsequent cleavage by hot piperidine after reaction with the probe, implying additional sample purification and buffer exchange16. The reduction in the number of steps in the protocol with B-CePs implies the use of smaller amounts of the initial DNA substrate. Finally, the chemical mapping by B-CePs, described herein with the TBA sequence as a proof-of-concept, will lead to new experiments applicable to any other potential G-quadruplex-forming sequence.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova (PRIDJ-BIRD2019).

Materials

Acrylamide/bis-acrylamide solution 40% Applichem A3658 R45-46-20/21-25-36/38-43-48/23/
24/25-62
Ammonium per-sulfate (APS) Sigma Aldrich A7460
Analytical balance Mettler Toledo
Autoclave pbi international
Boric acid Sigma Aldrich B0252
Bromophenol blue Brilliant blue R Sigma Aldrich B0149
di-Sodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate Fluka 71649
DMSO Sigma Aldrich 276855
DNA oligonucleotides Integrated DNA Technologies synthesis of custom sequences
EDTA disodium Sigma Aldrich E5134
Formamide Fluka 40248 H351-360D-373
Gel imager GE Healtcare STORM B40
Glycerol Sigma Aldrich G5516
Micro tubes 0.5 mL Sarstedt 72.704
Potassium Chloride Sigma Aldrich P9541
Sequencing apparatus Biometra Model S2
Silanization solution I Fluka 85126 H225, 314, 318, 336, 304, 400, 410
Sodium phosphate monobasic Carlo Erba 480086
Speedvac concentrator Thermo Scientific Savant DNA 120
TEMED Fluka 87689 R11-21/22-23-34
Tris-HCl MERCK 1.08387.2500
Urea Sigma Aldrich 51456
UV-Vis spectrophotometer Thermo Scientific Nanodrop 1000

References

  1. Davis, J. T. G-quartets 40 years later: from 5′-GMP to molecular biology and supramolecular chemistry. Angewandte Chemie. 43 (6), 668-698 (2004).
  2. Varshney, D., Spiegel, J., Zyner, K., Tannahill, D., Balasubramanian, S. The regulation and functions of DNA and RNA G-quadruplexes. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 21 (8), 459-474 (2020).
  3. Chambers, V. S., et al. High-throughput sequencing of DNA G-quadruplex structures in the human genome. Nature Biotechnology. 33 (8), 877-881 (2015).
  4. Zuravka, I., Sosic, A., Gatto, B., Gottlich, R. Synthesis and evaluation of a bis-3-chloropiperidine derivative incorporating an anthraquinone pharmacophore. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 25 (20), 4606-4609 (2015).
  5. Zuravka, I., Roesmann, R., Sosic, A., Gottlich, R., Gatto, B. Bis-3-chloropiperidines containing bridging lysine linkers: Influence of side chain structure on DNA alkylating activity. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 23 (6), 1241-1250 (2015).
  6. Zuravka, I., et al. Synthesis and DNA cleavage activity of bis-3-chloropiperidines as alkylating agents. ChemMedChem. 9 (9), 2178-2185 (2014).
  7. Sosic, A., Gottlich, R., Fabris, D., Gatto, B. B-CePs as cross-linking probes for the investigation of RNA higher-order structure. Nucleic Acids Research. 49 (12), 6660-6672 (2021).
  8. Sosic, A., et al. Bis-3-chloropiperidines targeting TAR RNA as a novel strategy to impair the HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein. Molecules. 26 (7), 1874 (2021).
  9. Sosic, A., et al. In vitro evaluation of bis-3-chloropiperidines as RNA modulators targeting TAR and TAR-protein interaction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23 (2), 582 (2022).
  10. Sosic, A., et al. Direct and topoisomerase II mediated DNA damage by bis-3-chloropiperidines: The importance of being an earnest G. ChemMedChem. 12 (17), 1471-1479 (2017).
  11. Bock, L. C., Griffin, L. C., Latham, J. A., Vermaas, E. H., Toole, J. J. Selection of single-stranded DNA molecules that bind and inhibit human thrombin. Nature. 355 (6360), 564-566 (1992).
  12. Paborsky, L. R., McCurdy, S. N., Griffin, L. C., Toole, J. J., Leung, L. L. The single-stranded DNA aptamer-binding site of human thrombin. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 268 (28), 20808-20811 (1993).
  13. Carraro, C., et al. Behind the mirror: chirality tunes the reactivity and cytotoxicity of chloropiperidines as potential anticancer agents. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 10 (4), 552-557 (2019).
  14. Carraro, C., et al. Appended aromatic moieties in flexible bis-3-chloropiperidines confer tropism against pancreatic cancer cells. ChemMedChem. 16 (5), 860-868 (2021).
  15. Kypr, J., Kejnovska, I., Renciuk, D., Vorlickova, M. Circular dichroism and conformational polymorphism of DNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 37 (6), 1713-1725 (2009).
  16. Onel, B., Wu, G., Sun, D., Lin, C., Yang, D. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay and dimethyl sulfate footprinting for characterization of G-quadruplexes and G-quadruplex-protein complexes. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2035, 201-222 (2019).

Play Video

Cite This Article
Sosic, A., Dal Lago, C., Göttlich, R., Gatto, B. In Vitro Chemical Mapping of G-Quadruplex DNA Structures by Bis-3-Chloropiperidines. J. Vis. Exp. (195), e65373, doi:10.3791/65373 (2023).

View Video