This protocol describes performing a craniectomy using a high-speed pneumatic drill on a 3-month-old Danish Landrace pig. The access is made through the frontal bone and reveals the ventral dura mater and underlying cerebral hemispheres. This procedure allows for access to a large portion of the pig brain.
The use of pigs as an experimental animal model is especially relevant in neuroscience research, as the porcine and human central nervous systems (CNS) share many important functional and architectural properties. Consequently, pigs are expected to have an increasingly important role in future research on various neurological diseases. Here, a method to perform an anterior craniectomy through the porcine frontal bone is described. After a midline incision and subsequent exposure of the porcine frontal bone, anatomical landmarks are used to ensure the optimal location of the craniectomy. By careful and gradual thinning of the frontal bone with a rounded drill, a rectangular opening to the dura mater and underlying cerebral hemispheres is achieved. The presented method requires certain surgical materials, including a pneumatic high-speed drill, and some degree of surgical experience. Potential complications include unintended lesions of the dura mater or dorsal sagittal sinus. However, the method is simple, time-efficient, and offers a high degree of reproducibility for researchers. If performed correctly, the technique exposes a large portion of the unaffected pig brain for various neuromonitoring or analyses.
In general, animal models are used when practical and/or ethical limitations prohibit the use of human patients to examine diseases or test surgical methods. Novel animal models are generally established to provide new knowledge with translational value to human conditions. Rodents are often utilized due to practical and financial considerations, but they have limited translational value to humans, especially due to substantial anatomical differences1. Pigs, however, offer several advantages compared to rodents. Not only do pigs share several key anatomical, physiological, metabolic, and genetic features with humans, but the size of the porcine organ systems can be weight-matched to resemble human organs2,3. This gives pigs a unique role among surgical animal models and in procedural training4. Although the use of porcine models requires certain practical and financial capabilities compared to the use of rodents, pigs offer both a financially and ethically more acceptable option compared to the use of non-human primates.
The porcine brain is of particular interest in translational neuroscience research. Firstly, the architecture of the pig brain is similar to that of the human brain, as both are white matter-predominant and gyrencephalic3,5,6. Secondly, the larger brain size in pigs compared to rodents permits the use of surgical equipment and various imaging modalities equivalent to those used in clinical settings7,8. Consequently, various porcine models have been used extensively in neuroscience research over recent decades9. The majority of these porcine CNS models, however, require direct analysis of brain tissue, which can be obtained in various ways (e.g., implantation of catheters or electrodes, tissue biopsies, etc.)10. Since most of these modalities require some degree of instrumentalization and direct access to the brain, different approaches for surgical access must be considered.
This method involves performing an anterior craniectomy through the frontal bone on a sedated 3-month-old female Danish Landrace pig. The overall purpose of this manuscript is to describe a method for exposing a large proportion of the ventral porcine brain through a craniectomy using a pneumatic high-speed drill. The first step is to place the subject in a suitable position with an elevated head. Since the porcine cranium is quite different from that of humans, the second step involves planning the placement of the craniectomy using various anatomical landmarks. The third step is to access the underlying dura mater covering both hemispheres without damaging it.
All animal experiments described were performed at Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, in accordance with existing laws and under the approval of the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate (license no. 2020-15-0201-00401). Domestic swine, female, approximately 40 kg and 3 months of age, were used for this study. The details regarding the reagents and equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Subject housing
2. Anesthesia and monitoring
3. Animal positioning
4. Preparation of surgical equipment
5. Exposing the frontal bone
6. Identifying anatomical landmarks of the exposed frontal bone
7. Access to the dura mater
8. Removal of the bone plate
9. Protecting exposed dura mater
10. Insertion of microdialysis catheters (MDC)
11. Microdialysis (MD)
12. Euthanaziation
The prone position of the pig's head provides optimal access for the surgeon during the procedure, and the use of stabilizing sandbags reduces the risk of unintended shifts in the pig's head position while drilling.
During this demonstration, the superficial anatomical landmarks of the pig's superior skull (both superior orbital crests and the nuchal crest) (Figure 1 and Figure 3) were used to precisely identify the centered sagittal line before making the incision. After the incision and removal of the galea aponeurotica, the sagittal suture was identified to determine the true anatomical midline (Figure 2). Following exposure of the frontal bone, the three palpable landmarks (Figure 1 and Figure 3) and the sagittal suture (Figure 2) were used to define a triangle within which the borders of the craniectomy were determined within the desired location (Figure 4A). These landmarks are well-suited for this procedure as they are closely related to the pig brain (Figure 7).
After gradually drilling and thinning the frontal bone along the borders of the craniectomy (Figure 4B), a contact point for the underlying dura mater was achieved, allowing for assessment of the remaining thickness of the frontal bone.
Finally, after carefully removing the frontal bone, the underlying dura mater covering the cranial two-thirds of both cerebral hemispheres was revealed. The procedure was considered successful because (1) the revealed underlying dura mater was intact (Figure 6); (2) the opening in the frontal bone was centered, confirmed by the location of the dorsal sagittal sinus (Figure 5); and (3) only minor venous hemorrhages occurred along the exposed spongiosa bone.
The integrity of the dura mater was assessed by visually inspecting for obvious cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage through smaller defects. These leaks would pulsate synchronously with the pulsation of both hemispheres. The intact dura mater was confirmed as no visual CSF leakage was observed, and both hemispheres appeared elevated and rounded synchronously with the pulsation (Figure 6). This elevated appearance of the hemispheres indicates a net positive pressure within the CSF, equivalent to intact meninges.
The correct centered location of the craniectomy was crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it ensured maximal exposure of both hemispheres for later instrumentalization. Secondly, it reduced the risk of accidentally damaging the dorsal sagittal sinus with the drill. The correct location was confirmed after the bone plate was removed, and the contours of both cerebral hemispheres were symmetrically separated by the fissure just above the dorsal sagittal sinus (Figure 4).
Minor venous bleeding is expected from both the dura mater and the exposed trabecular bone. This can be managed by applying bone dust from the craniectomy for a few minutes to achieve hemostasis. If this is not sufficient, hemostasis can be ensured by applying low-voltage cauterization to the origin of the hemorrhage using a mono- or bipolar cautery.
Figure 1: Image of the exposed frontal bone. The three anatomical landmarks are identified by manual palpation: the nuchal prominence and the caudal aspect of each superior orbital crest. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Image of the exposed frontal bone after dissection, revealing the sagittal suture and the coronal suture. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: 3-dimensional computed tomography scan. The scan of the posterior aspect of the porcine skull visualized from a frontolateral perspective (A) and a posteriosuperior perspective (B). Anatomical landmarks of the frontal bone are highlighted in red (superior orbital crest) and blue (nuchal crest). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Images of the exposed frontal bone. (A) Defining each corner of the rectangular craniectomy using the nuchal prominence and superior orbital crests as landmarks. (B) Drilling the initial line of the craniectomy by connecting each corner. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Depiction of the exposed dura mater with underlying cerebral hemispheres and sagittal suture. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Image of the dura mater with underlying cerebral hemispheres seen from a frontal perspective. If the dura mater is intact, both hemispheres are elevated and rounded synchronously to the pulsation (marked with white stipulated lines). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Horizontal computed tomography scan. The scan of the porcine skull revealing the anatomical relationship between the posterior orbital crest (red), nuchal crest (blue), and cerebrum (yellow). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The demonstrated procedure involves several critical steps. Firstly, the accurate planning of the craniectomy's location is crucial due to the composition of the porcine skull. Since the thickness of the porcine frontal bone increases at the lateral edges, placing the opening too laterally11 can make it difficult to reach the dura mater during drilling. Additionally, locating the opening correctly within the midline is important to reduce the risk of unintended damage to the underlying dorsal sagittal sinus. However, it is important to note that pigs exhibit significant individual variations in the composition of their cranium, and not all pigs show a clearly defined sagittal or coronal suture, unfortunately11. Therefore, the method presented in this procedure relies on more general anatomical landmarks such as the nuchal crest and orbital prominences to improve accuracy in locating the craniectomy.
While a rounded drill at high speeds is efficient, it also entails a high risk of accidental dura lesions, especially at the initial contact point. Gradual practical experience can help lower this risk. However, pneumatic high-speed drills are generally expensive compared to alternatives like regular manual drills, which is a significant limitation. One could argue for improving the procedure by using a manual cranial drill for the initial dura contact, followed by a footed craniotome. This approach might decrease the risk of dura lesions as the dura would not be exposed to high-speed moving objects. However, in our experience, the varying thickness and distribution of sinusoids within the porcine frontal bone make the use of regular craniotomes challenging.
The overall purpose of the presented method is to achieve visual access to a large proportion of the porcine brain through a practical, simple, and time-efficient procedure. We believe that the demonstrated procedure offers several advantages compared to less invasive procedures like burr-hole craniotomies. Firstly, this method exposes a significantly larger proportion (approximately 20 cm2) of the pig brain compared to single burr-hole craniotomies (0.7-1.5 cm2, depending on the diameter of the drill). This not only allows for substantial instrumentalization of the brain (e.g., insertion of ventricular drains, neuronal sensors, multiple catheters, probes, or stimulating electrodes) but also enhances navigation for specific brain areas using visible structures such as the lateral hemisphere borders, gyri contours, or the dorsal sagittal sinus. Secondly, the brain itself is not damaged during the procedure when performed correctly, which can be achieved relatively quickly by an experienced practitioner.
Although the demonstrated procedure was used to describe the intracerebral penetration of moxifloxacin in a non-survival porcine study12, we believe that this method is suitable for survival studies too. Reinserting the bone plate and closing the overlying skin tissue through sutures would allow the pig to wake up unharmed following the procedure. However, this would only be practically and ethically feasible if the underlying cerebral cortex remains relatively unharmed from possible instrumentalization, ensuring an intact neurological state. Survival studies of this nature would require strict antiseptic techniques and close post-operative monitoring of the pigs for signs of neurological deficits due to surgical trauma or hemorrhage, such as epidural hematomas.
In general, we believe the presented method is simple, reproducible, and has significant applications within various future porcine models relevant to the central nervous system (CNS), especially in cases where considerable instrumentalization and/or monitoring of the otherwise uninterrupted porcine brain is needed.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to express our gratitude for the support and technical experience shared by the personnel at the Biomedical Laboratory, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
10 mL plastic syrringes | Becton, Dickinson and Company | 303219 | |
107 Microdialysis pump | M Dialysis | P000127 | 107 Microdialysis Pump |
2 mL plastic syrringes | Becton, Dickinson and Company | 300928 | |
25 mm, 18 G needles | Becton, Dickinson and Company | 304100 | |
Bair Hugger heater | 3M | B5005241003 | |
Bair Hugger heating blanket | 3M | B5005241003 | |
Batery for microdialysis pump | M Dialysis | 8001788 | Battery 6V, 106 & MD Pump |
Dissector | Karl Storz | 223535 | Flattended 3 mm dissector |
Endotracheal tube size 6.5 | DVMed | DVM-107860 | Cuffed endotracheal tube |
Euthasol Vet | Dechra Veterinary Products A/S | 380019 | phentobarbital for euthanazia, 400 mg/mL |
Farabeuf Rougine | Mahr Surgical | Flat headed rougine (12 mm) | |
Foley Catheter 12 F | Becton, Dickinson and Company | D175812E | Catherter with in-built thermosensor |
Intravenous sheath | Coris Avanti | Avanti Cordis Femoral Sheath 6 F | |
Microdialysis brain catheters | M Dialysis | P000050 | membrane length 10 mm -shaft 100 mm 4/pkg |
Microdialysis syringe | M Dialysis | 8010191 | 106 Pump Syringe 20/pkg |
Microvials for microdialysis sampling | M Dialysis | P000001 | Microvials 250/pkg |
Operating table | |||
Pneumatic high-speed drill | Medtronic | Medtronic Midas Rex 7 drill | |
Primus respirator | Dräger | Respirator with in-built vaporiser for supplementary Sevofluran anesthesia | |
Rounded diamond drill | Medtronic | 7BA40D-MN | |
Self-retaining retractor | World Precission Instruments | 501722 | Weitlander retractor, self-retaining, 14 cm blunt |
Sterile Saline | Fresnius Kabi | 805541 | 1000 mL |
Sterile surgical swaps | |||
Surgical scalpel no 24 | Swann Morton | 5.03396E+12 | Swann Morton Sterile Disposable Scalpel No. 24 |
Zoletil Vet | Virbac | Medical mixture for induction of anesthesia |
.