This is a method to generate “scarless” recombinant vaccinia viruses using host-range selection and visual identification of recombinant viruses.
Vaccinia virus (VACV) was instrumental in eradicating variola virus (VARV), the causative agent of smallpox, from nature. Since its first use as a vaccine, VACV has been developed as a vector for therapeutic vaccines and as an oncolytic virus. These applications take advantage of VACV’s easily manipulated genome and broad host range as an outstanding platform to generate recombinant viruses with a variety of therapeutic applications. Several methods have been developed to generate recombinant VACV, including marker selection methods and transient dominant selection. Here, we present a refinement of a host range selection method coupled with visual identification of recombinant viruses. Our method takes advantage of selective pressure generated by the host antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) coupled with a fluorescent fusion gene expressing mCherry-tagged E3L, one of two VACV PKR antagonists. The cassette, including the gene of interest and the mCherry-E3L fusion is flanked by sequences derived from the VACV genome. Between the gene of interest and mCherry-E3L is a smaller region that is identical to the first ~150 nucleotides of the 3’ arm, to promote homologous recombination and loss of the mCherry-E3L gene after selection. We demonstrate that this method permits efficient, seamless generation of rVACV in a variety of cell types without requiring drug selection or extensive screening for mutant viruses.
Vaccinia virus (VACV) was instrumental for the first successful eradication of a human pathogen, variola virus (VARV), from nature. Ever since the extermination of variola virus, poxviruses including VACV have continued to be useful therapeutic viruses for both human and animal medicine. For example, a VACV-based rabies virus vaccine has been very effective in preventing transmission of sylvatic rabies in Europe1 and the United States2. More recently, recombinant poxviruses expressing a variety of anti-tumor molecules (e.g., single-chain antibodies or human erythropoietin) have seen encouraging success as oncolytic agents3,4,5. VACV is particularly attractive as a vector because it is readily amenable to genetic manipulation, possesses a broad host range, and it is stable under a variety of conditions, allowing easy transportation and vaccine viability in the field6,7. While multiple techniques have been developed to generate recombinant VACV for laboratory experiments and vaccine generation, current strategies to generate these viruses have notable limitations.
Because of the utility of VACV, multiple strategies to generate recombinant viruses have been developed. The first strategy employs homologous recombination to introduce a cassette including the transgene and a selectable marker gene such as an antibiotic resistance gene. The cassette is flanked by two ~500 nucleotides (nt) or larger arms directing the gene to a specific site in the viral genome, which is then stably integrated by double crossover events8,9,10. This strategy is rapid and efficient; however, it results in extra genetic material in the form of the marker gene that may produce unexpected effects. Furthermore, there is a practical upper limit to the number of transgenes that can be introduced limited by the number of unique selectable markers available. Transient dominant selection (TDS) strategies have addressed this issue by facilitating the generation of "scarless" recombinant viruses11. Using this strategy, a plasmid containing a mutant VACV gene and a selectable marker gene are integrated into the viral genome, but without additional flanking VACV DNA. This approach results in transient integration of the entire plasmid and duplication of the VACV gene as a result of integration by a single crossover event. This intermediate is stable as long as it is maintained under selection pressure, permitting enrichment of this construct. When selection is removed, the VACV duplication enables a second crossover event that results in the removal of the plasmid and subsequent formation of either the wild type (wt) or recombinant virus in an approximate 50:50 ratio. While TDS generates recombinant viruses without requiring the stable introduction of foreign DNA, multiple virus clones must be screened for the expected mutation by sequencing analysis, a potentially time consuming and costly step.
Here, we present an approach to generating recombinant poxviruses combining the best aspects of each of these approaches, similar to an approach that has been described for the replication incompetent modified vaccinia Ankara12,13,14. This strategy combines visual and host range selection to rapidly generate recombinant viruses by double crossover events, and subsequently eliminate the selectable marker gene by homologous recombination. This approach permits the rapid generation of mutants mediated by homologous recombination, with the "scarless" nature of TDS approaches, while not requiring a subsequent screening step to distinguish wild type and mutant viruses. Our method also uses host range selection in place of antibiotic selection, eliminating the risk of chemically induced phenotypic changes in the cell line. For this approach, we have chosen to use the host antiviral protein kinase R (PKR) as the selective agent to generate recombinant VACV. PKR is expressed as an inactive monomer in most cell types15. Upon binding double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) at the N-terminal dsRNA-binding domains, PKR dimerizes and is autophosphorylated16. This active form of PKR phosphorylates the alpha subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), ultimately inhibiting delivery of initiator methionyl-tRNA to the ribosome, thereby preventing intracellular translation and broadly inhibiting the replication of many virus families17,18.
In response to the broad and potent antiviral activity of PKR, many viruses have evolved at least one strategy to prevent PKR activation. Most poxviruses express two PKR antagonists, encoded by the E3L and K3L genes in VACV, which antagonize PKR through two distinct mechanisms19. E3 prevents PKR homodimerization by binding double-stranded RNA20,21, while K3 acts as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor by binding directly to activated PKR and thereby inhibiting interaction with its substrate eIF2α22. Importantly, these two PKR antagonists do not necessarily inhibit PKR from all species. For example, the K3 homolog from the sheeppox virus strongly inhibited PKR from sheep, whereas the sheeppox E3 homolog did not show considerable PKR inhibition23,24. In this study, we present a method to use PKR-mediated selective pressure combined with fluorescence selection to generate a VACV recombinant deleted for E3L and K3L (VC-R4), which cannot replicate in PKR competent cells derived from diverse species. This recombinant virus provides an excellent background for rapid generation of recombinant viruses expressing genes under control of the native E3L promoter.
1. Generating the recombination vector
2. Generating the recombinant virus
We used the procedure diagrammed in Figure 1 to generate a VACV lacking both PKR antagonists E3L and K3L, by replacing E3L with EGFP in a virus already deleted for K3L (vP872). Figure 2 shows red fluorescent plaques in PKR competent RK13 cells indicative of viral expression of mCherry-E3L, as well as EGFP expressed in RK13+E3L+K3L cells confirming the loss of E3L and collapse of the mCherry-E3L selection marker. Figure 3 confirms that this recombinant virus, VC-R4, lacking both PKR antagonists cannot replicate in PKR competent RK13 cells, while the parent virus, vP872 expressing E3L, is replication competent. To confirm that this inability to replicate in RK13 cells was only due to the loss of E3L, we replaced EGFP in VC-R4 with E3L, to generate a revertant virus using the same selection protocol. Figure 3 also validates that this revertant virus replicates as efficiently as vP872 in RK13 cells. Interestingly, colorless plaques consistent with collapse of the mCherry-E3L selection marker were identified prior to selection in RK13+E3+K3 cells that are generally required to select “scarless” recombinants, likely because of the extended sequence identity between the mCherry-E3L recombination cassette and the E3L gene being inserted into VC-R4. Therefore, to determine the efficiency of recombination and the rate of collapse we elected to produce viruses expressing the poxvirus PKR antagonist K3L to avoid the problem of early collapse23. Figure 4 indicates the appearance of colorless plaques (arrowheads) after infection of RK13+E3L+K3L cells. Table 1 shows the results of three independent experiments, where on average 12.6% of progeny virions had undergone recombination with the transfected plasmid, similar to previously reported frequencies29,30,31. Table 2 details the frequency of colorless plaques relative to total plaques in RK13+E3L+K3L cells, demonstrating the rate of collapse and loss of the mCherry-E3L selection marker occurred at a frequency of approximately 1.8%.
Figure 1: Diagram of p837-GOI-mCherry-E3L as well as the host-range and visual recombination strategy. (A) 5’ arm (black) and 3’ arm (grey) flank the E3L locus (brown) in VACV. (B) In p837-GOI-mCherry-E3L, these arms flank a cassette containing the gene of interest (GOI), in this case EGFP, (green) separated from an mCherry-E3L (red) fusion gene under control of the synthetic early/late poxvirus promoter25 blue) by a short 3’ arm (grey). These external arms drive homologous recombination between VACV and the p837-GOI-mCherry-E3L. Black arrowheads indicate the sites of the overlapping primers used to generate this plasmid by Gibson cloning. (C) When PKR selective pressure is removed, viruses that have undergone intramolecular recombination between the short and long 3’ arms can be selected. (D) Resulting in a virus (VC-R4) containing only the gene of interest in the E3L locus. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Fluorescent micrographs of (top) a recombinant virus plaque 24 hours after recombination with p837-GOI-mCherry-E3L expressing both mCherry (left) and EGFP (right) in RK13 cells. (Bottom) Micrograph of a recombinant virus plaque 48 hours after PKR-mediated selective pressure has been removed in RK13++ cells, expressing EGFP (right) but not mCherry (left). The scale bar indicates 650 μm for all panels. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: VC-R4 cannot replicate in PKR competent cells. The indicated cell lines were infected with vP872 (blue), VC-R4 (green), or VC-R4+E3L (magenta) at MOI = 0.1. 48 hours post-infection the infected cells were harvested and titered by serial dilution on RK13+E3L+K3L cells. Titers are reported in PFU/mL, errors bars represent the standard deviation of three replicate experiments. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Loss of mCherry-E3L expression in RK13+E3L+K3L cells. Overlay of fluorescent and phase contrast micrographs of VC-R4+K3L-mCherry-E3L infected RK13+E3L+K3L cells. Three plaques no longer express mCherry (circles) due to collapse of the selection cassette yielding VC-R4+K3L. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Experiment 3 | |
Red plaques (RK13) | 30 | 11 | 18 |
Total plaques (RK13+E3L+K3L) | 225 | 64 | 249 |
Recombination Rate | 13.30% | 17.20% | 7.20% |
Table 1: Recombination frequency of VACV with the p837-K3L-mCherry-E3L plasmid.
Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Experiment 3 | |
Total plaques (RK13+E3L+K3L) | 115 | 44 | 210 |
Colorless plaques (RK13+E3L+K3L) | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Recombination Rate | 2.60% | 2.30% | 0.50% |
Table 2: Frequency of mCherry-E3L loss from VC-R4+K3L-mCherry-E3L in RK13+E3+K3 cells.
Here we present a variation of a transient marker selection strategy 32 to generate recombinant vaccinia viruses without retaining foreign DNA in the final recombinant virus. Our strategy uses selective pressure mediated by the host antiviral protein PKR rather than other forms of selective pressure such as antibiotics. The use of host antiviral genes eliminates the possibility of chemically induced phenotypic changes in the cells, or increased risk of mutation due to selection drugs. Furthermore, unlike with drug selection, there is no lag phase for our approach, because PKR is expressed constitutively in all cells. Secondary visual selection based on mCherry expression also improves the specificity of this method by ensuring that only plaques expressing the transgene are picked during the first phase, and is equally efficient as a negative selective marker while selecting mature recombinant viruses that have lost the mCherry-E3L gene.
The most critical steps for this recombination strategy are the generation of the appropriate recombination vector, and appropriate plaque purification to ensure that the selected virus is clonal. In this paper we suggest “Gibson assembly” to generate the recombination vector. This strategy is extremely efficient and allows assembly of all the fragments comprising the recombination vector in a single day. However, because the short 3’ arm and the long 3’ arm share identical sequences, these fragments have the potential to be joined together during the cloning reaction, and some vectors may not contain the mCherry-E3L cassette. In our experience this is rare but confirming the structure of the vector after cloning is necessary. We have also generated recombination vectors for this strategy using traditional endonuclease and ligase methods. This strategy avoids the problem described above but can be more labor intensive. Plaque purification is generally straightforward and is primarily reliant on using appropriate permissive cells for the initial recombination, PKR-competent cells for initial plaque purification to ensure that only recombinant viruses can replicate, and then permissive cells again to facilitate intramolecular recombination and loss of the selectable marker. Close attention to cell lines is therefore critical for the successful and efficient application of this strategy.
In this study, we demonstrate the use of this method to generate a VACV recombinant deleted for both PKR antagonists E3L and K3L and expressing EGFP under control of the E3L promoter. Going forward, this virus will serve as an efficient background for future recombinant viruses, as it is incapable of replicating in PKR competent cells. Therefore, there will be strong PKR-mediated selective pressure to drive the mCherry-E3L recombination cassette into progeny virions while at the same time essentially preventing replication of non-recombinant virus. Furthermore, the loss of EGFP by uptake of the recombination cassette is a useful secondary selection marker to ensure picked plaques are not co-infected with a non-recombinant virus. We observed rates of recombination consistent with previously reported rates for VACV, but the visual fluorescent markers increase the efficiency of generating recombinant viruses by ensuring that increasing the likelihood that the appropriate recombinant viruses are selected. Our observation of colorless plaques after two rounds of selection on PKR-competent cells, presumably due to the increased length of identical sequence between E3L and the mCherry-E3L marker gene, suggests that the rate of mCherry-E3L loss may be “tuned” by increasing or decreasing the length of the 3’ short arm. The primary limitation of this technique is the use of PKR as the selective pressure for recombinants. The most efficient use of this recombination strategy is generating these viruses in a background lacking PKR antagonists. However, the colorimetric selection marker allows this recombination strategy to be used even without the selection mediated by PKR, simply by plaque purifying mCherry-expressing plaques. While the lack of PKR-mediated selective pressure will reduce the efficiency of the first screening step, the percentage of mCherry expressing plaques is still high enough that color-based selection is viable. Thus, this method can be used to insert nearly any gene into the poxvirus genome.
As demonstrated by the insertion of EGFP, with this approach, any gene can be rapidly inserted into the E3L locus under control of the native promoter, provided that PKR null cells or complimenting cell lines are used for downstream experiments if the transgene is not a PKR antagonist. This strategy, combined with the VC-R4 virus that we report here, adds a new and potent method to rapidly and reliably generate recombinant vaccinia viruses using host-mediated selective pressure and visual identification of recombinants early in the process.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This project was funded by the National Institutes of Health (AI114851) to SR.
2X-Q5 Master Mix | NEB | M0492L | High-fidelity polymerase used in PCR |
Ampicillin | ThermoFisher Scientific | 11593027 | Bacterial selective agent |
Disposable Cell Scrapers | ThermoFisher Scientific | 08-100-242 | Cell scraper to harvest infected cells |
EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell imaging system | ThermoFisher Scientific | AMAFD2000 | Fluorescent microscope |
EVOS Light Cube, GFP | ThermoFisher | AMEP4651 | GFP Cube |
EVOS Light Cube, RFP | ThermoFisher | AMEP4652 | RFP Cube |
GenJet | SignaGen Laboratories | SL100489 | Transfection reagent |
Luria Bertani (LB) Broth | Gibco | 10855021 | Bacterial growth medium |
Monarch DNA gel extraction kit | NEB | T1020L | Gel purification kit used to purify amplicons and linearized vectors |
Monarch Plasmid Miniprep kit | NEB | T1010L | Miniprep kit ussed to purify plasmids |
NanoDrop One | ThermoFisher Scientific | ND-ONE-W | Spectrophotometer used to measure RNA and DNA concentration |
NEBuilder Master Mix | NEB | E2621L | Isothermal enzymatic assembly kit used to generate the recombination vector |
Q500 Sonicator | Qsonica | Q500-110 | Sonicator for virus lysates |
RK13 cells | ATCC | CCL-37 | Rabbit kidney cells |
VWR Multiwell Cell Culture plates | VWR | 10062-892 | Cell culture plates |