Using a webcam and a combination of free and inexpensive software programs, locomotive patterns in Drosophila melanogaster can be analyzed to detect differences in the speed, distance, and time of various motor activities.
Video tracking systems have been used widely to analyze Drosophila melanogaster movement and detect various abnormalities in locomotive behavior. While these systems can provide a wealth of behavioral information, the cost and complexity of these systems can be prohibitive for many labs. We have developed a low-cost assay for measuring locomotive behavior and seizure movement in D. melanogaster. The system uses a web-cam to capture images that can be processed using a combination of inexpensive and free software to track the distance moved, the average velocity of movement and the duration of movement during a specified time-span. To demonstrate the utility of this system, we examined a group of D. melanogaster mutants, the Bang-sensitive (BS) paralytics, which are 3-10 times more susceptible to seizure-like activity (SLA) than wild type flies. Using this novel system, we were able to detect that the BS mutant bang senseless (bss) exhibits lower levels of exploratory locomotion in a novel environment than wild type flies. In addition, the system was used to identify that the drug metformin, which is commonly used to treat type II diabetes, reduces the intensity of SLA in the BS mutants.
Given its short lifespan and the robust genetic tools available, Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model system for investigating the etiology of various diseases and the underlying physiology of various biological processes. In many cases, it is advantageous to measure the effects that behavioral, genetic or pharmacological manipulations have on locomotion in these model organisms1,2.
There are a variety of methods that are commonly used for measuring fly movement in two-dimensions3-7. These systems can support the tracking of multiple flies simultaneously and can measure velocity, record path lengths and record the percentage of time a fly has spent moving. They have been used to study movement in a variety of contexts including the effects of drugs on locomotion and the sexual dimorphic nature of fly movement6-9. The major drawback of these systems is cost of the tracking system or the corresponding software and camera. In some cases, this can run in the thousands of dollars. Cost is a particular concern for a lab that would only need limited use of such a system, for example, quantifying locomotive patterns of a newly isolated mutant.
A simpler but less robust method is to use systems which record movement based on how many times a fly crosses an infrared light beam path that is placed in the middle of a closed tube10,11. While such systems can give valuable information on movement and sleep-wake cycles, they can over or under estimate movement because they fail to capture the actual path of the fly. For example, flies that exhibit considerable movement at the ends of the tube will register as low movement flies although additional high-resolution methods have been used to try and circumvent these limitations12.
Simpler and cheaper still are climbing devices that measure geotaxis, the upward movement of flies, through a single tube or a series of tubes2,13. While such systems are cheap and can easily identify geotaxis defects, they fail to capture many other aspects of movement that would be of interest to investigators.
For many labs, a low-cost robust analysis system that is simple to set-up and operate would be an advantageous tool for characterizing behavioral differences in D. melanogaster strains. Here we describe an assay that can be set-up for less than two hundred dollars and is able to give information about the path, velocity and duration of the fly's movement. To demonstrate the efficacy of the assay, we present data showing that it can be used to identify; 1) a locomotor defect in a Bang-sensitive (BS) mutant that is susceptible to seizures and 2) the ability of the drug metformin, which is commonly used to treat type II diabetes, to reduce the intensity of seizure-like activity (SLA) in two BS mutants.
1. Preparation of Individual Flies for Locomotion Assay
2. Preparation of Individual Flies for Seizure Assay
3. Video Recording
4. Data Analysis Using ImageJ
5. Data Analysis Using Excel
The technique described here has been used previously to analyze differences in SLA in the Drosophila BS mutants1. The results presented here involve the BS strains easily shocked (eas), bang senseless (bss), and technical knockout (tko). The eas locus encodes an ethanolamine kinase involved in phosphatidyl ethanolamine synthesis15 and the tko locus encodes a mitochondrial riboprotein16. The bss mutation is an allele of the paralytic (para) voltage-gated sodium channel17. The alleles used in this study were eas1, bss1, and tko25t.
An illustration of the efficacy of the method to measure SLA can be seen in Figure 1, which depicts the path length of a eas seizure-sensitive control fly as compared to one that has been fed the drug metformin. Metformin is a biguanide used to treat type II diabetes. The drug inhibits mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I, which, via the upregulation of AMPK, triggers an increase in glycolysis and glucose uptake in mammalian cells18. Previous studies have found that metformin upregulates glycolytic genes, presumably to compensate for the inhibition of aerobic metabolic pathways19. Figure 2 demonstrates that feeding the BS mutants eas and tko metformin for two days (25 mg/g of food) reduces the SLA path length.
In addition to reducing the path length, the data generated by this method can be used to analyze differences in SLA velocity and SLA duration. In this case, the data indicate that SLA duration was significantly reduced (Figure 3) while SLA velocity was not changed significantly (Figure 4).
The assay described above can also be used to measure locomotion over a defined period of time. Figure 5 shows an example of a path traversed by a wild type Canton-Special (CS) fly and a path traversed by a bss fly over a period of 15 min. While the movement of both flies was concentrated at the edges of the circular area, the CS fly exhibited much more locomotion over the 15 min recording period. The assay is therefore useful in looking at both the amount of movement and the pattern of movement of the flies.
The average distance traversed by bss flies was significantly lower than that of CS flies as indicated by Figure 6. Not only did the bss flies display less movement, they tended to move with a slower velocity. Changes in the velocity of movement of two individual flies are depicted in Figure 7. Using this data, an average velocity can be calculated and compared as in Figure 4 for SLA. Based on the representative flies shown in Figure 7, it is apparent that the CS flies had more frequent bouts of fast movement while the bss flies had more bouts of inactivity during the period represented in the figure.
Figure 1. Representative paths of SLA in eas mutants and eas mutants fed metformin. Individual flies were mechanically shocked to induce SLA. The path of an individual fly during the SLA is represented in the figure. A) Path of an eas mutant. B) Path of an eas mutant fed metformin. (Bar represents 1 cm).
Figure 2. Individual flies were mechanically shocked to induce SLA. The distance the fly moved during the SLA was used as a measure of SLA intensity. In both BS mutants examined, metformin significantly reduced the distance moved. Data was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (*p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; n = 15).
Figure 3. Individual flies were mechanically shocked to induce SLA. The time the fly spent undergoing SLA was used as a measure of SLA intensity. In both BS mutants examined, metformin significantly reduced the SLA duration. Data was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (*p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; n = 15).
Figure 4. Individual flies were mechanically shocked to induce SLA. The average velocity of the fly during the bout of SLA was used as a measure of SLA intensity. There was no significant change in average velocity for the two BS mutants tested when fed metformin. Data was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (n = 15).
Figure 5. Paths of individual flies in the arena. Traces represent the paths individual flies traversed in the arena during the 15 min monitoring period. A) Path of an active CS fly with the movement concentrated around the periphery of the circular arena. B) Path of a typical bss fly. Movement was still concentrated around the periphery but there was much less movement as compared to CS flies. (Bar represents 1 cm)
Figure 6. Fly locomotion when exposed to a novel environment. Individual flies were placed in a 5 cm diameter arena (5 mm in height) and movement was monitored for 15 min. Path lengths were calculated for each fly and the average lengths were taken for each genotype. The bss mutants displayed a significant reduction in path length as compared to CS flies. Data was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test (**p < 0.01; n = 10).
Figure 7. Velocity as a function of time during exploratory locomotion for a CS (A) and a bss (B) fly. An individual fly was placed in a 5 cm diameter arena (5 mm in height) and movement was monitored for 15 min. Velocity was calculated every 0.5 sec by averaging the velocity over a 1 sec sliding window (movement from the previous 0.5 sec to the subsequent 0.5 sec interval.) After a few initial bursts of activity the bss fly remains relatively inactive throughout the trial.
When examining locomotor or movement patterns in Drosophila, it is useful to be able to extract information regarding the distance traveled, the velocity of movement and the pattern of movement. In order to extract this information, expensive equipment has traditionally been employed that is often prohibitive for smaller labs or labs that wish to use such assays sparingly4,8,9.
The assay described here can be used to determine the distance traveled (Figures 2 and 6), the velocity of the movement (Figures 4 and 7) and the pattern of movement (Figures 1 and 5) using equipment that costs less than two hundred dollars. Using the Excel Visual Basic program we have developed, the series of x, y coordinates generated by the ImageJ program can be analyzed to extract all this information. This system has been used previously to identify both genetic and pharmacological suppressors of SLA in the seizure-sensitive Drosophila BS mutants1.
While the system can extract valuable information, we have only analyzed one fly at a time. This can be a significant drawback as compared to the highly parallel commercial options4. The Multitracker plug-in for ImageJ does have the ability to track multiple objects simultaneously but we have not tried this option. For this locomotor assay, a single fly is placed under a plastic Petri dish lid. Depending on the position of the camera, one could film multiple Petri dishes to do parallel recordings. The drawback is that the resolution will decrease as the web camera is positioned to take in a larger field. How this affects the integrity of the recording is not known, but a higher end camera would be an option if one wanted to pursue parallel recordings.
The recordings done here are limited to 15 min but it is possible to do longer recordings if one employs the 64-bit version of ImageJ. The 32-bit version has a memory limit that restricts the size of the files one can analyze. For longer recordings, it is essential to use the 64-bit version of ImageJ.
One of the biggest issues regarding this method is the need to remove the noise from the data generated by processing it in the ImageJ software. However, this is not unique to this method as similar noise issues must be resolved with other recording options3,5,6,8. As discussed in the methods, a stationary fly may display minor amounts of movement when processed through ImageJ because the program measures movement from the center of the object, which can vary even in a stationary object due to fluctuations in light and fly posture.
Our Visual Basic Excel program uses a sliding window analysis to set a threshold for movement. This threshold may vary depending on the assay. For seizure analysis, the sliding window looks at ten recording points, which spans 1 sec of real time. If the fly has moved 0.5 cm or more during this time it is considered to be actively seizing. If it is less, it is considered to be at rest. When looking at normal movement, a lower threshold is needed to determine the cut off and this has to be achieved via trial and error. A threshold of 0.1 cm/sec was used in this study. The best way to achieve this is to record a fly while it is stationary for a brief period of time and then adjust the cutoff so that it indicates no movement during the recording.
In summary, this low-cost method represents a viable assay for extracting meaningful information regarding the various parameters of fly locomotion. It is an ideal screening technique to use to identify if a behavioral, genetic or pharmacological manipulation has an effect on locomotion or seizure susceptibility.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors also wish to express thanks to Kris Burner, Stephen McKinney, Laura Tobin, Jenny Gilbreath, Ashley Olley, Megan Hoffer, and Megan Hyde for their work in fine-tuning this assay.
Name of the Reagent/Equipment | Company | Catalog Number/Model | Comments |
WebCam | Logitech | Pro900 | Any quality webcam will suffice. |
HandiAVI time-lapse software | Azcendant software | Latest version can be found at http://www.azcendant.com/ | |
ImageJ | NIH | Latest version can be found at http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/download.html | |
Multiracker Plug-In | NIH | Latest version can be found at http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/plugins/index.html | |
Vortexer | VWR | Vortex Genie 2 | Most standard size vortexers such as the Vortex Genie 2 will suffice. |
5cm petri dish cover | LabM Limited | D011 | Smaller or larger petri dish covers can be used for an arena in movement assay. |
Light box | Built from scrap material. | Illumination is used for the locomotion assay. Depending on the room lighting, it is possible to perform the assay without the light box. |