Two complementary analyses of atmospheric biological particles from air sampled filters are described herein: the extraction and detection of endotoxin, and of DNA.
Outdoor aerosol research commonly uses particulate matter sampled on filters. This procedure enables various characterizations of the collected particles to be performed in parallel. The purpose of the method presented here is to obtain a highly accurate and reliable analysis of the endotoxin and DNA content of bio-aerosols extracted from filters. The extraction of high molecular weight organic molecules, such as lipopolysaccharides, from sampled filters involves shaking the sample in a pyrogen-free water-based medium. The subsequent analysis is based on an enzymatic reaction that can be detected using a turbidimetric measurement. As a result of the high organic content on the sampled filters, the extraction of DNA from the samples is performed using a commercial DNA extraction kit that was originally designed for soils and modified to improve the DNA yield. The detection and quantification of specific microbial species using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) analysis are described and compared with other available methods.
Air sampling on filters is a basic tool in atmospheric aerosols research.1 The sampled filters are the starting point for various chemical, physical, and biological characterizations of the collected ambient particles.2-11 The advantage of this approach is that various analyses can be performed off-line on the same sample. Compiling the data from all the different analyses enables the researcher to obtain a good understanding of the characteristics of the collected particles and aids in solving complex questions in the atmospheric sciences.12,13 For example, marine and inland air-samples taken during the same period can be compared with respect to the sampled particle toxicity and biological composition.14 For this study, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), components on gram-negative bacterial cell-walls, also known as endotoxins, were extracted from filters sampled on-shore and at an inland site, and were evaluated using the limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) test. In parallel, a genomic evaluation of the bacterial content (total bacteria, gram negative, and cyanobacteria) was performed on the same sample using the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR). The LAL test is based on measurements of turbidity formed following the addition of an aqueous extract of amebocytes from the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, to an aqueous solution containing the endotoxins. The higher the endotoxin concentration in the sample, the faster turbidity develops.15 The q-PCR analysis is based on a fluorescence signal emitted as a specific DNA fragment is amplified.16 By real time monitoring of the signal during the exponential phase of the PCR reaction and calibrating with a standard curve, the initial DNA amount can be quantified. The combination of these two analyses together with others, as detailed elsewhere,14 can provide a good estimation of the levels of endotoxin and the amount of the source bacteria in the samples.
The purpose of the method presented here is to obtain a highly accurate and reliable analysis of the endotoxin and DNA content of bio-aerosols extracted from filters. While methods for sampling the physical and inorganic chemical characteristics of aerosols are well known and, more recently, methods have been developed to investigate its organic matter component,17 there has been scant research on the biological component of aerosols.18 The rationale for the current method is to address this gap by presenting in detail a robust method for extracting, analyzing, and identifying the biological fraction of airborne aerosols.14
The method detailed here is expected to find wide-spread use in biological indoor and outdoor aerosol research projects involving filter analysis.20-24
Note: A detailed list of all the materials and instruments used in this protocol is shown in the Materials section.
1. Air Sampling on Filters
2. Endotoxin Analysis
Note: Disinfect the work surface with 70% ethanol and work with pyrogen-free tubes, tips and reagents only. If glassware are used, pre-heating at 250 °C for 30 min, or 200 °C for 60 min is required.25 Prepare all reagents in a class II biosafety cabinet and work with gloves and a lab coat at all times.
Tube | Final endotoxin concentration (EU ml-1) | Standard endotoxin volume (ml) | Pyrogen free water volume (ml) | total volume (ml) |
Ed0 | 2,500 | stock solution* | 5 | |
Ed1 | 1,000 | 80 (from Ed0) | 120 | 200 |
Ed2 | 100 | 20 (from Ed1) | 180 | 200 |
Ed3 | 50 | 10 (from Ed1) | 190 | 200 |
Ed4 | 25 | 5 (from Ed1) | 195 | 200 |
Ed5 | 12.5 | 2.5 (from Ed1) | 197.5 | 200 |
Ed6 | 6.25 | 1.25 (from Ed1) | 198.75 | 200 |
Ed7 | 3.125 | 6.25 (from Ed2) | 193.75 | 200 |
Ed8 | 1.563 | 6.25 (from Ed3) | 193.75 | 200 |
Ed9 | 0.781 | 6.25 (from Ed4) | 193.75 | 200 |
Ed10 | 0.391 | 6.25 (from Ed5) | 193.75 | 200 |
Ed11 | 0.195 | 6.25 (from Ed6) | 193.75 | 200 |
Blank | 0 | 0 | 200 | 200 |
* Prepare the stock solution as per the manufacturer's instructions. |
Table 1: Endotoxin Standard Curve. Endotoxin concentration, volume of standard endotoxin and of pyrogen-free water to be added, and the total volume obtained are detailed for each dilution tube in the calibration curve.
Figure 1: Endotoxin array plate. An example of an endotoxin analysis array in a 96-well microplate.
3. Genomic Analysis
Note: For DNA extraction, disinfect the work surface with 70% ethanol and work with sterile tubes, tips and reagents only. For q-PCR analysis of DNA, disinfect the work surface with surface DNA-decontaminant. Prepare all reagents in a class II biosafety cabinet and work with gloves and a lab coat at all times.
A- Preparation of Standard Cell Dilution Series | ||||
Tube | Final cell concentration (cell ml-1) | Standard cell volume (ml) | Nuclease free water volume (ml) | Total volume (ml) |
Od0 | determine with Hemocytometer counting chamber | |||
Od1 | should be eluted to the range of 107 cells ml-1 | 20 | ||
Od2 | 10-1 Od1 | 2 of Od1 | 18 | 20 |
Od3 | 10-2 Od1 | 2 of Od2 | 18 | 20 |
Od4 | 10-3 Od1 | 2 of Od3 | 18 | 20 |
Od5 | 10-4 Od1 | 2 of Od4 | 18 | 20 |
Od6 | 10-5 Od1 | 2 of Od5 | 18 | 20 |
Od7 | 10-6 Od1 | 2 of Od6 | 18 | 20 |
Od8 | 10-7 Od1 | 2 of Od7 | 18 | 20 |
Blank | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
B- Preparation of DNA Standard Curve | ||||
Tube | Final DNA concentration (mg ml-1) | Standard DNA volume (ml) | Nuclease free water volume (ml) | Total volume (ml) |
Dd0 | determine with NanoDrop | |||
Dd1 | should be eluted to the range of 101 mg ml-1 | 20 | ||
Dd2 | 10-1 Dd1 | 2 of Dd1 | 18 | 20 |
Dd3 | 10-2 Dd1 | 2 of Dd2 | 18 | 20 |
Dd4 | 10-3 Dd1 | 2 of Dd3 | 18 | 20 |
Dd5 | 10-4 Dd1 | 2 of Dd4 | 18 | 20 |
Dd6 | 10-5 Dd1 | 2 of Dd5 | 18 | 20 |
Dd7 | 10-6 Dd1 | 2 of Dd6 | 18 | 20 |
Dd8 | 10-7 Dd1 | 2 of Dd7 | 18 | 20 |
Blank | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
Table 2: DNA Standard Curve. Standard microorganism cell dilution series (A) detailed for the standard cell volume, NFW volume, and the total volume in each dilution tube. DNA standard curve preparation (B), detailed for the standard DNA volume, NFW volume, and the total volume in each dilution tube.
Parameter | Details | Comments |
Detection method | Quantitative hydrolysis probe | |
Thermal cycling conditions | ||
Initial denaturation and enzyme activation | 95 °C for 10 min | |
Denaturation | 95 °C for 15 sec | repeat 45 times |
Annealing and extension | 60 °C for 60 sec | |
Plate array | ||
Standard curve | Dd1 – Dd8 | 3 repeats per dilution in 1-8 wells at the top 3 rows |
Non-template control (NTC) | Nuclease free water (NFW) | 3 repeats in the 9th well at the top 3 rows. |
Analyzed samples | DNA extracted from filters | 3 repeats per sample at the remaining wells. |
Primer set | per each well | |
sample volume | 10 ml |
Table 3: Details for q-PCR operating software. Details of the analysis parameters to be entered into the q-PCR program file.
Reagent | Volume per reaction (ml) | Number of reactions | Allowance for error (5%) | Total volume mix (ml) |
Taq polymerase mix | 5 | 50 | 52.5 | 262.5 |
F primer (10 mM) | 0.5 | 50 | 52.5 | 26.25 |
R primer (10 mM) | 0.5 | 50 | 52.5 | 26.25 |
Nuclease free water | 3 | 50 | 52.5 | 157.5 |
DNA – 1 ml will be added directly into the target wells in the 96 plate. |
Table 4: Quantitative-PCR Reaction Mix Calculation. Volume per reaction, number of reactions, allowance for error, and the total calculated volume to be added into the reaction mix per reagent are detailed.
It is common to study atmospheric aerosols using "off-line" analyses of sampled filters (see Figure 2).32 Chemical analyses of the sampled matter include organic (e.g. protein, hydrocarbon molecules, saccharides) and inorganic (e.g. metals, salts) content. Biological analyses include viable and non-viable microorganism content, species identification using a DNA approach or microscopy, as well as DNA-based quantification.
Figure 2: Filer sample analysisflow chart. Filter after air-sampling (A), preparation of the filter for downstream analyses (B), and analysis of the sample components (C).
For the endotoxin extraction, filter sub-samples (1.12 cm2) are shaken in 1 ml PFW for 60 min at room temperature. The samples are then centrifuged for 10 min at 375 x g. Different centrifugation speeds can result in different extraction efficiencies, as indicated in Figure 3A.
A preliminary test for extraction efficiency should be conducted for the specific filter chosen and protocol performed. In Figure 3B, higher extraction efficiencies are obtained from spiking clean compared with sampled quartz filters, and both of these efficiencies are lower than that achieved via direct detection of the standard solution. As discussed elsewhere, the nature of the ambient aerosols sampled on the filter can also affect the endotoxin extraction efficiency.14,33
Figure 3: Endotoxin extraction efficiency. The effect of centrifugation speed (A) and filter load (B) on endotoxin extraction efficiency. Error bars represent standard deviation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The reaction for endotoxin detection involves a 1:1 ratio of LAL reagent to the endotoxin standard, the sample-extracted endotoxins, or the blanks. It is recommended to use triplicates for sample analysis. However, for standard curves, duplicates are sufficient. When the absorption readings (at 405 nm) are completed, the resulting optical density (OD) is analyzed after exporting it into a data-analysis spreadsheet program for further analysis of the data.
Extraction of DNA from the air-sampled filter is performed directly from portions of sub-sampled filters. DNA extraction is performed using a commercial soil-sample DNA isolation kit, with some modifications to increase the DNA yield. Thus, glass beads are added to agitate the filters in a bead-beater to improve the release of DNA into the solution. To prevent sample heating (which may lead to denaturation of the DNA), this step is divided into five 1 min intervals, with the tube cooled on ice between intervals. The extraction can then continue according to the manufacturer's procedure.
As in the endotoxin extraction, it is important to perform a preliminary analysis of the DNA extraction efficiency under the specific experimental conditions. This is done by spiking a known amount of a standard organism cell solution onto a piece cut from the filter, following the DNA extraction protocol described above.34
The concentration of the target microorganism extracted from the sampled aerosols is determined using q-PCR. Here the hydrolysis probe technique is used, which has the advantage of high specificity, because of the additional probe bound to the template DNA.35 The SYBR green method can also be applied for this purpose.
Calibration curves are derived from DNA extracted from the chosen organisms of interest, using the extraction method described above. A mixed pool of the reaction compounds, excluding the DNA sample, standard, or control, is prepared and kept in the dark and on ice until required. Then, an aliquot of the mixed pool is added into each well in a 96 microwell optical plate. The DNA standard, sample, or control is added after the reaction mix according to the plate array. After all reagents have been inserted into the plate, it is sealed with an optical adhesive film and spun down to collect all droplets at the bottom of the wells. The plate is than inserted into the q-PCR instrument for thermal cycle amplification and signal detection.
The output data consist of PCR Ct values, which are defined as the cycle number at which the amplified DNA amount reaches the threshold level. Using the calibration curve values, the concentration of target DNA can be obtained (see Figure 4).36 The microorganism's cell concentrations can be calculated from the Ct values of the extraction efficiency compared with a hemocytometer count of the standard organism solution.37
Figure 4: Quantitative-PCR amplification plot. (A) and calibration curve ranging between 2 x 10-4-2 x 102 (B) performed for representative gram negative bacterial DNA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This work describes extraction and detection methods for quantifying both endotoxins and DNA present in aerosol samples collected on filters. The methods require accurate routines and can be performed easily as long as the experimentalist adheres to a few essential and important points discussed here.
For the endotoxin detection step, note that the lysate solution is quite viscous and tends to produce bubbles upon pipetting. It is difficult to remove thee bubbles, and they lead to changes in the microplate-reader values. Therefore, it is important to first place the sample in the plate and only after ensuring that all the bubbles disappeared, continue with the addition of the lysate solution. A helpful technique to prevent bubble formation in this step is to work slowly with the pipette, and not to press it all the way when draining the lysate into the wells. As a reaction start immediately once the lysate is being added to the endotoxin extract, it is essential to start the reading as soon as possible. To shorten the lysate addition step, a multichannel pipette can be used. Note that in some kits and protocols there is an additional pre-incubation step of the samples at 37 °C for 10 min, after it is placed in the micro titter plate.29 Only after this step, the lysate can be added.
An important point for environmental sample extraction of endotoxins is the presence of inhibitors in the samples (e.g. in high pollution air sample). In this case, dilution becomes critical, and can prevent false enhancement, typically observed for non-diluted sample.38
Similarly, there are several points of importance to ensure the success and reliability of the q-PCR detection. 1) As the volume of the solutions is very small, if they are not placed at the bottom of the well, the water content in the DNA drop could be reduced by evaporation while arranging the samples on the plate. To prevent this problem, place the DNA sample at the bottom of the well, cool the plate by placing it on ice or another cooling platform, and prepare everything in advance to quicken this step as much as possible. 2) When preparing the q-PCR reaction mix (Table 4), cover the tube with aluminum foil to prevent photo-degradation. 3) The present experiment describes the preparation of a 10 µl reaction. Nevertheless, in some q-PCR instruments, the reaction volume is 20 µl and then the volume of each reagent is multiplied accordingly. 4) The optimal thermal cycle conditions may change for different primers and polymerase mixes.39 For example, the annealing temperature should be set at around the melting temperature of the primers, and is determined empirically as the temperature at which amplification occurs most efficiently. For this reason it is also important to prepare a calibration curve for each analyzed q-PCR plate, to ensure that the quantification is accurate. Calibration curves as well as standard-spiked filters serve also as a positive control, to ensure that no inhibition occurs. To avoid inhibition, it is recommended to use extraction kits designed to remove inhibitors from environmental samples. 5) The number of thermal cycles in this experiment was set to the maximum number, 45, in order to increase sensitivity as the DNA concentrations from the filter extracts were very low. 6) Ensure that the Cycles to Threshold (Cτ) values for all DNA samples are within the dynamic range of the calibration curve. Also ensure that any amplification of a negative control sample is at least eight cycles greater than that of the DNA samples. 7) If working with the SYBR Green reagent, make sure that there are no multiple melting temperature peaks per reaction.
For turbidimetric test, two endotoxin quantification methods are available: the kinetic method and the endpoint chromogenic method. In the kinetic approach, as performed in this protocol, the time required for the sample to reach maximal absorbance is measured. Here, a shorter reaction interval indicates a higher endotoxin concentration in the sample. In the endpoint chromogenic method, light absorption is measured after a defined incubation time to determine the endotoxin concentration. Both methods require a standard calibration curve for quantification.40
Although the precision and accuracy of the endotoxin extraction described above is very high,14 the extraction efficiency could be improved. It is possible that a different type of filter or the addition of a detergent (such as Polysorbate 20) to the extraction procedure could improve the yield of endotoxin extracted from the filter. Endotoxin extraction efficiency may also be influenced by different particles sampled in parallel on the filter.33 For our experimental setup, the method's limit of detection is estimated to be 0.001 EU m−3.14
Techniques for quantifying the DNA extract that could serve as an alternative to q-PCR include cloning approach and digital droplet PCR (DD-PCR). The advantages of q-PCR over the cloning approach for species identification are its greater sensitivity and that it requires a lower DNA concentration for the initial amplification step. In addition, unlike q-PCR, the cloning method, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming, is not quantitative. An alternative method for the quantification of the DNA extract is DD-PCR.19 The advantage of this technique is that it does not require a calibration curve, as the detection is based on a single DNA strain in each droplet. However, for environmental samples, no reliable method exists so far for droplet-detection of DNA extracted from filters.
The efficiency with which DNA is extracted from the filter, as well as the accuracy and precision of the DNA measurements, can be influenced by factors such as filter type, target microorganisms, and instrumentation.34,41 Therefore it should be defined prior to the sample analysis. In our experimental setup, the limit of detection can reach down to 3.5 genome m-3.14
To conclude, the method described here is applicable for the identification and quantification of air-sampled biological species from both anthropogenic and natural sources. Precise use of the appropriate assay enables valuable investigations of complex environmental questions to be undertaken.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors thank Dr. Yoav Barak from the Chemistry Faculty, Weizmann Institute, for support and advice. This study was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant # 913/12), and by the Minerva Foundation with funding from the Federal German Ministry for Education and Research.
Filter sampling | |||
HiVol 3000 – High Air Volume Sampler | Ecotech | ||
Quartz Microfiber Filters | Whatman | 1851-865 | 203mm X 254mm |
ELF – Laboratory Chamber Furnaces | Carbolite | ELF 11series | |
Aluminum foil | Opal | ||
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Endotoxin | |||
Ethanol | Sigma Aldrich | 16368 | Laboratory Reagent, 96% |
Airstream Class II Biological Safety Cabinet AC-4E1 | ESCO | 10011712 | |
Pyrotell -T | Associates of Cape Cod, Inc. | T0051 | |
Control Standard Endotoxin | Associates of Cape Cod, Inc. | E0005-1 | Escherichia coli O113:H10, 0.5 µg/vial 1 Pack |
LAL Reagent Water | Associates of Cape Cod, Inc. | W0051 | |
10 mL sterile syringe with Luer-Lok Tip | Becton-Dickinson & Co. | 309605 | |
BD Precisionglide syringe needle | Becton-Dickinson & Co. | 305129 | Sterile |
Parafilm-M sealing tape | Parafilm | P7543 | Sigma catalog number |
Microtubes | Axigen | MCT-200-C | 2ml, pyrogen free |
1.12 cm diameter Cork Borer | Boekel Scientific | 1601 BD Series – Steel | Part of a cork borer set containing borers with various diameters. |
50 mm Petri Dish | Miniplast Ein-Shemer | 72050-01 | Aseptic |
Vortex Genie 2 | Scientific Industries, inc. | SI-0297 | |
Microcentrifuge 5415 D | Eppendorf | 22621408 | |
TC MicroWell 96 F SI w/lid | Nunc | 167008 | Flat bottom wells (with lid (individually wrapped)), sterile, pyrogen free |
Synergy HT Multi-Detection Microplate Reader | Biotek | 7091000 | |
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
DNA | |||
DNA away | Sigma Aldrich | 7010 | |
Standard DNA of the microbial species of interest | ATCC or other culture collection | Either the appropriate microbial strain for DNA extraction or the extracted DNA | |
Neubauer-improved | Marienfeld | 640030 | hemocytometer |
TE buffer, Low EDTA | Life Technologies | 12090-015 | 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) 0.1 mM EDTA |
Nuclease-free PCR-grade water | Sigma Aldrich | 3315959001 | |
PCR primers | Sigma Aldrich | Targets the microbial species of interest | |
Dual-Labeled Probes | Sigma Aldrich | Targets the microbial species of interest | |
Screw cap tubes | Axigen | ST-200-SS | 2 mL |
PowerSoil DNA extraction kit | Mo Bio Laboratories | 12888-100 | |
Glass beads, acid-washed 425-600 Microns | Sigma Aldrich | G8772-100G | |
Glass beads, acid-washed <106 microns | Sigma Aldrich | G4649-100G | |
PowerSoil Solution C1 | Mo Bio Laboratories | 12888-100-1 | Cell lysis buffer , Power soil Kit |
Magic Touch ice bucket | Bel-Art | 18848-4001 | |
Mini-Beadbeater-16 | BioSpec | 607EUR | |
StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System | Applied Biosystems | 4376600 | |
Fast SYBR Green Master Mix | Applied Biosystems | 4385612 | |
TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix | Applied Biosystems | 4370048 | |
MicroAmp Fast Optical 96-Well Reaction Plate with Barcode, 0.1 mL | Applied Biosystems | 4346906 | |
MicroAmp Splash-Free 96-Well Base | Applied Biosystems | 4312063 | |
MicroAmp Optical Adhesive Film | Applied Biosystems | 4311971 | |
Centrifuge 5810 R | Eppendorf | 5811 000.010 | Rotor A-4-62 with MTP buckets |