This protocol describes the Cell-Free Protein Synthesis (CFPS) system used in constructing synthetic cells. It outlines key stages with representative results in different micro-compartments. The protocol aims to establish best practices for diverse laboratories in the synthetic cell community, advancing progress in synthetic cell development.
The Cell-Free Protein Synthesis (CFPS) system has been widely employed to facilitate the bottom-up assembly of synthetic cells. It serves as the host for the core machinery of the Central Dogma, standing as an optimal chassis for the integration and assembly of diverse artificial cellular mimicry systems. Despite its frequent use in the fabrication of synthetic cells, establishing a tailored and robust CFPS system for a specific application remains a nontrivial challenge. In this methods paper, we present a comprehensive protocol for the CFPS system, routinely employed in constructing synthetic cells. This protocol encompasses key stages in the preparation of the CFPS system, including the cell extract, template preparation, and routine expression optimization utilizing a fluorescent reporter protein. Additionally, we show representative results by encapsulating the CFPS system within various micro-compartments, such as monolayer droplets, double-emulsion vesicles, and chambers situated atop supported lipid bilayers. Finally, we elucidate the critical steps and conditions necessary for the successful assembly of these CFPS systems in distinct environments. We expect that our approach will facilitate the establishment of good working practices among various laboratories within the continuously expanding synthetic cell community, thereby accelerating progress in the field of synthetic cell development.
The synthesis of synthetic or artificial cells has emerged as a highly prominent field of interdisciplinary research, attracting substantial interest from scientists across the domains of synthetic biology, chemistry, and biophysics. These scientists are united by the common goal of constructing a minimal living cell1,2,3. The rapid growth of this field has been in step with significant advancements in critical technologies, such as recombinant DNA manipulation4, biomimetic materials5, and microfabrication techniques for compartmentalization6, including the Cell-Free Protein Synthesis (CFPS) method7. CFPS systems encompass the essential cellular machinery for transcription and translation, providing the foundational framework for the development and integration of multifunctional artificial cells.
Although CFPS techniques are frequently used in the assembly of synthetic cells, developing a robust and tailored CFPS system for the assembly of various synthetic cell systems remains a complex challenge. Currently, numerous CFPS systems are available, derived from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes model organisms8, each specialized for particular applications in synthetic cell synthesis. Beyond their central roles in transcription and translation, CFPS systems vary in their main components and associated preparation procedures. These variations, which include differences in cell extracts, RNA polymerases, template preparation methods, and buffer compositions, are largely due to the distinct development trajectories pursued by research groups that have intensively optimized their systems for maximal protein yield.
Among the various components of the CFPS system, the cell extract is a critical enzymatic pool for transcription and translation, and thus a key determinant of CFPS performance9. Escherichia coli (E. coli)–based CFPS is the most commonly utilized system due to its status as the best-understood prokaryotic organism. Furthermore, a fully reconstituted CFPS system comprising individually purified proteins and ribosomes, known as PURE10, has been developed by Ueda's research group, which is particularly suited for applications requiring a clear background. Today, even E. coli-based CFPS systems have diversified, especially in terms of the source strains for the extrac11 and methods of preparation12,13, RNA polymerase14,15, energy sources16,17, and buffer systems18,19. The most frequently used strains include K12 and B strain derivatives, such as A1920, JM10921, BL21 (DE3)22, and Rossetta223, alongside their genetically modified counterparts.
Initially, E. coli strains with reduced RNase and protease activities were chosen to enhance mRNA stability and the stability of newly synthesized recombinant proteins, leading to increased final protein yields24. Subsequently, E. coli extracts were engineered to facilitate specific post-translational modifications, including glycosylation25, phosphorylation26, and lipidation27, were developed to achieve the above posttranslational modifications. Additionally, an array of additives such as molecular chaperons28 and chemical stabilizers have been incorporated to aid the folding of target proteins, contributing to the diversification of CFPS systems. The bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase, known for its high processivity, is predominantly employed for transcription, although other polymerases such as SP629 have also been utilized. E. coli endogenous RNA polymerase has been adapted for the prototyping of genetic circuits leveraging sigma factors30. Lastly, a variety of energy precursors31,32,33 and different salts and buffer components19,34,35 have been systematically optimized to enhance productivity.
Besides the CFPS system itself, the encapsulation methods as well as compartmentalization materials are also vital for the successful synthetic cell assembly. Various systems that have been developed to successfully encapsulate the CFPS reaction include surfactant-stabilized water/oil droplets, lipid/polymer, and their hybrid unilamellar vesicles (with diameters ranging from 50 nm to several μm), as well as planar-supported lipid bilayers. However, due to the complexed molecule content of the CFPS system, the success rate of encapsulation depends on specific cases, particularly for the formation of vesicles. To improve the success rate and efficiency of encapsulation of CFPS, various microfluid chips have been developed to facilitate the formation of both droplets and vesicles36. Nevertheless, additional chips and devices will need to be established.
This protocol delineates an E. coli CFPS system utilizing the BL21(DE3) strain, which is a commonly employed host for recombinant protein production. The protocol encompasses a detailed account of the cell extract preparation, template preparation, and standard expression optimization using a fluorescent reporter protein. Moreover, we present exemplary outcomes achieved by encapsulating the CFPS system within diverse micro-compartments, including monolayer droplets, double emulsion vesicles, and chambers situated atop supported lipid bilayers. Finally, we expound upon the pivotal procedural elements and the requisite conditions indispensable for the successful establishment of these CFPS systems within distinct environmental contexts.
1. Extract preparation
2. T7 RNA polymerase
3. Buffer preparation
4. Template design and preparation
5. Mg2+ and K+ optimization
6. Encapsulation
For each new batch of cell extract and T7 RNA polymerase, it is recommended to perform a basic screening of both Mg2+ and K+ concentrations to ensure the optimal performance of the CFPS system. The fluorescence of superfolder GFP can serve as an indicator of the overall yield of the CFPS system under varying conditions, as illustrated in Figure 1A,B. Additionally, a parallel yield comparison of the CFPS system across different compartments is shown in Figure 1C, demonstrating consistent performance in encapsulated CFPS systems, albeit with a slight decrease in GUVs, potentially due to the influence of sucrose46. Furthermore, CFPS reactions were successfully encapsulated in droplets (Figure 2), GUVs (Figure 3), and atop SLBs (Figure 4).
Figure 2A highlights the formation of emulsion droplets, evident when the oil solution became turbulent. The expression of green/red fluorescent proteins (GFP and mCherry) was captured using a confocal laser scanning microscopy. Figure 3 showcased the success of the encapsulation of CFPS reaction within GUVs through the simple emulsion transfer process. The red channel indicated the labeled lipids; the green channel showed the expression of superfolder GFP; and the yellow channel represented an inert fluorescent dye. Figure 4A shows the SLB chamber where the CFPS reaction could be deposited. Within this chamber, an SLB was formed on top of the glass coverslip, with the CFPS reaction mixture placed atop the preformed SLB, enabling imaging via a confocal laser scanning microscopy. As indicated in Figure 4B, SLB was visualized by labeled lipids, shown in green, while the expressed small GTPase Cdc42 fused with mCherry was shown in magenta. The in-situ expression of mCherry-Cdc42 was observable, along with the reversible membrane targeting process, under the microscope. However, the CFPS system utilized was supplemented with prenylation machinery, as detailed in a recent publication47.
Figure 1: Optimization and comparison of the CFPS system. Screening of (A) Mg2+ concentration and (B) K+ concentrations for the CFPS system in bulk. (C) A bar chart showing protein expression yields in different compartments. The fluorescence of superfolder GFP was used to determine the yield of the CFPS system, measured by a plate reader or a confocal laser scanning microscope. Abbreviations: CFPS = cell-free protein synthesis; GFP = green fluorescent protein; sfGFP = superfolder GFP; GUV = giant unilamellar vesicle; SLB = supported lipid bilayer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Cell-free protein synthesis in droplets. (A) A photo of encapsulated CFPS reactions in surfactant-stabilized water-in-oil droplets. (B) Brightfield and (C,D) fluorescence images of CFPS of (C) mCherry and (D) superfolder GFP encapsulated in droplets visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Superfolder GFP is indicated in green; mCherry is indicated in magenta. Scale bars = 20 µm. Abbreviations: CFPS = cell-free protein synthesis; GFP = green fluorescent protein. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Cell-free protein synthesis in GUVs. (A) A photo of encapsulated CFPS reactions in GUVs. (B–D) Fluorescence image of encapsulated CFPS within POPC GUVs, expressing superfolder GFP. (B) The lipid bilayer was labeled with 0.05% labeled Atto647N-DOPE lipids, shown in red, (C) an inert dye shown in yellow, and (D) superfolder GFP was indicated in green. Scale bars = 20 µm. Abbreviations: CFPS = cell-free protein synthesis; GFP = green fluorescent protein; GUV = giant unilamellar vesicle; POPC = 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-glycerol-3-phosphocholine; DOPE = 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Cell-free protein synthesis of small GTPase protein-Cdc42 on top of SLBs. (A) Schematic illustration of the reconstitution of Cdc42's membrane targeting and RhoGDI-dependent membrane extraction on SLBs, as visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The prenylation machinery was implemented via a prenlytransferase-enriched extract, which is detailed described elsewhere.47. (B) An orthogonal view of the pre- and postprenylation of the reaction mixture on top of SLB. (C,D) Time series of mCherry-Cdc42 intensity on the membrane (pink) and in solution (black) during (C) membrane targeting and (D) membrane extraction. Scale bars = 10 µm. (A–D) were adapted from Kai et al.47. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: List of buffers. NOTE: Add β-mercaptoethanol and DTT just before use. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 2: Pipetting scheme for Mg2+ concentration screening. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 3: Pipetting scheme for K+ concentration screening. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 4: Inner-solution composition. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 5: Outer solution composition. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 6: Preinner solution composition. Please click here to download this Table.
This manuscript outlines a modified Cell-Free Protein Synthesis (CFPS) system designed for use in various micro-compartments across synthetic cell platforms, including water-in-oil droplets, GUVs, and SLBs. We utilized the standard E. coli recombinant protein expression host strain, BL21(DE3), as the source extract for constructing protein-centric synthetic cell systems. This approach yielded approximately 0.5 mg/mL of protein across different compartments. While other customized extract source strains could be used, these systems have been primarily optimized for a specific type of protein or metabolic activity, which may be suboptimal for general protein expression. Recent advancements in quantitative mass spectrometry analysis have facilitated pilot studies on the proteomic analysis of cell lysate48,49, particularly under various preparation conditions.
Despite gaining insights from these studies, establishing a quantitative correlation between these identified protein factors and the overall performance of CFPS systems remains challenging. This gap left unanswered questions about how to quantitatively assess the performance of a given batch of extract. Additionally, there has been no systematic and parallel comparison of different source strains reported. In this study, we utilized 2xYPTG medium to boost biomass production, a strategy recommended to transition to 2xYPT when utilizing endogenous RNA polymerase for transcription. Despite suggestions that T7 polymerase could be integrated into the extract preparation procedure45, we opted for a separate preparation protocol for S30 extract and T7 RNA polymerase to reduce high batch-to-batch variations.
The production of target protein is intrinsically linked to the central transcription/translation process. Proper template design and purity are crucial for successful cell-free expression. In addition to the plasmid template, linear double-stranded DNA generated by PCR can also be employed, offering suitability for screening and high-throughput applications. Unlike conventional template design for in vivo expression in E. coli, template design in the E. coli cell-free system is simplified without the need for expression induction considerations. The only essential element of a cell-free expression template is a T7 regulatory sequence. However, in some instances, the 5' sequence of the target gene could influence the translation initiation, depending on the secondary structure formed by the corresponding transcribed mRNA. If the ribosome-binding site is located within a stable stem loop of the transcribed mRNA, translation initiation could be significantly hindered, leading to poor overall expression. Similarly, consecutive rare codons can hinder expression and should be optimized, similar to in vivo studies. This can be achieved through open-source servers dedicated to codon optimization50 and mRNA secondary structure prediction51.
Regarding the buffer system, we utilized an acetate buffer supplemented with creatine phosphate and creatine kinase as the sources of energy regeneration in our experimental setup. This setup yielded a moderate expression level and a relatively fast kinetic, attributable to the single-step energy regeneration reaction catalyzed by creatine kinase using creatine phosphate. While some researchers have shifted to a glutamate buffer system, citing its closer resemblance to the cellular environment52, we observed no significant differences in protein expression yields with our current protocols. However, recent proteomic analysis indicated that different buffer systems in combination with extract processing methods could influence the final expression yield19. Concerning energy precursors, diverse substrates have been investigated by numerous research groups to achieve cost-effectiveness and heightened expression yields53,54. In the context of the presented CFPS system, creatine phosphate and creatine kinase were deliberately chosen. This selection was motivated by the efficiency of energy regeneration achievable through a single-step reaction and the absence of interference with endogenous enzymes inherited from the extract. Consequently, this configuration establishes a straightforward yet robust system well-suited for various micro-compartment environments.
As indicated in the represented results, we demonstrated successful protein expression in three distinct microcompartments: water-in-oil droplets stabilized by semi-fluorinated oil, GUVs formed through emulsion transfer, and atop a supported lipid bilayer. The versatility of protein expression across different micro-compartments highlights the robustness of our CFPS system for synthetic cell construction. Among these encapsulation methods, the emulsion droplet technique was a notably straightforward approach for encapsulating the CFPS system, requiring only agitation or vortexing. However, these droplets tend to be unstable due to precarious water interface, a limitation that could be addressed by adding lipids or surfactants into the oil phase. Despite the practicality of stabilized water-in-oil droplets, they do not fully replicate the natural cell environment, which consists of two aqueous compartments separated by a cell membrane. Instead of droplets, giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) with sizes exceeding 1 micron were established to mimic cells more closely. The CFPS system was encapsulated within the lipid bilayer of these vesicles, furnishing transcription and translation machinery for diverse synthetic cell systems55.
Emulsion transfer, also known as double emulsion, stands out as the typical technique for encapsulating CFPS reactions, owing to its mild preparation process and relatively high encapsulation efficiency compared to solvent-free methods. However, the generation of double emulsion vesicles can range from simple centrifugation steps to the use of microfluidic-assisted emulsion transfer, each method with its associated advantages and disadvantages, as summarized elsewhere36. The successful encapsulation of the CFPS system within GUVs relies on tuning osmolarity and applying the proper force to traverse the oil-water interface. Although the emulsion transfer method described here is the most straightforward and requires no specific lab equipment, the efficiency and homogeneity of generated GUVs could vary between different batches. Moreover, all emulsion transfer methods must deal with residual oil in the lumen of the formed bilayer interface, necessitating an additional oil removal step56, which may pose challenges in kinetic projects.
Finally, we have shown the successful expression of CFPS atop a Supported Lipid Bilayer (SLB), offering a valuable approach for projects requiring protein synthesis in proximity to the lipid biomembrane environment. Through the utilization of the presented CFPS system, we have demonstrated its successful application in characterizing the reversible membrane targeting process of Cdc4247, a central protein molecule crucial for cellular polarity. In summary, the consistent medium expression yields and inherent robustness observed in various micro-compartments highlight the potential of this CFPS system in the construction of diverse synthetic cell systems. This capability can be further extended to include various protein-centered models, ultimately advancing towards the realization of minimal cells.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
M. Y. acknowledges the funding from the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. KYCX22_2803). L.K. is thankful for the support of the Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China, China (Grant No. 17KJB180003), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Normal University, China (Grant No. 17XLR037), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China, and the Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor program, China.
1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine(DOPC) | Avanti | 850375P | |
1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine (sodium salt)(DOPS) | Avanti | 840035P | |
1,4 dithiothreitol (DTT) | Sigma-Aldrich | 1.11474 | |
1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) | Avanti | 850457P | |
3,5-cyclic AMP (cAMP) | Sigma-Aldrich | A9501 | |
50 mL tubes | Eppendorf | Eppendorf Tubes BioBased | |
50% hydrogen peroxide | Sigma-Aldrich | 516813 | |
Acetate | Sigma-Aldrich | A6283 | |
Agar powder | Sigma-Aldrich | 05040 | |
Alanin | Sigma-Aldrich | A4349 | |
Amicon Stirred Cells | MerckMillipore | UFSC05001 | |
Ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) | Sigma-Aldrich | A7262 | |
Arginin | Sigma-Aldrich | A4474 | |
Asparagin | Sigma-Aldrich | A0884 | |
Aspartat | Sigma-Aldrich | A5474 | |
ATP | Roche | 11140965001 | |
Atto 488 DOPE | Sigma-Aldrich | 67335 | |
Atto 647N DOPE | Sigma-Aldrich | 42247 | |
Baffled Erlenmeyer flask | Shuniu | 250 mL, 1000mL | |
Bovine Serum Albumin(BSA) | Roche | 10711454001 | |
Centrifugetube | Eppendorf | Eppendorf Tubes 3810X | |
Centrifugetube rack | Eppendorf | 0030119819 | |
Chemiluminescence and epifluorescence imaging system | Uvitec | Alliance Q9 Advanced | |
Chloroform | Sigma-Aldrich | 288306 | |
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (LSM) | ZEISS | LSM 780 | |
Countess Cell Counting Chamber Slides | Thermo Fisher Scientific | C10283 | |
Coverslip | Thermo Scientific | Menzel BB02400500A113MNZ0 | |
creatine kinase (CK) | Roche | 10127566001 | |
Creatine phosphate (CP) | Sigma-Aldrich | 10621714001 | |
Culture dish | Huanqiu | 90 mm | |
Cystein | Sigma-Aldrich | C5360 | |
Cytidine 5'-triphosphate disodium salt (CTP) | aladdin | C101487 | |
Dialysis membrane | Spectrum | Standard RC Tubing MWCO: 12-14 kD | |
E.Z.N.A. Cycle Pure Kit | Omega Bio-Tek | D6492-01 | |
Electro-Heating Standing-Temperature Cultivator | Yiheng instrument | DHP-9602 | |
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA) | Biosharp | 1100027 | |
Fluorescent plate reader | BioTek | Synergy 2 | |
Fluorinated oil | Suzhou CChip scientific instrument | 2%HFE7500 | |
Folinic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 47612 | |
French Press | G.Heinemann | HTU-DIGI-Press | |
Glucose | Sigma-Aldrich | G7021 | |
Glutamat | Sigma-Aldrich | G5667 | |
Glutamin | Sigma-Aldrich | G5792 | |
Glycerol | Sigma-Aldrich | G5516 | |
Glycin | Sigma-Aldrich | G7126 | |
Guanosine 5'-triphosphate sodium salt hydrate(GTP) | Roche | 10106399001 | |
HEPES | Sigma-Aldrich | H3375 | |
HiPrep Q FF 16/10 | Cytiva | 28936543 | |
Histidin | Sigma-Aldrich | H6034 | |
Isoleucin | Sigma-Aldrich | I5281 | |
Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) | Sigma-Aldrich | I5502 | |
K2HPO4 | Sigma-Aldrich | P8281 | |
KH2PO4 | Sigma-Aldrich | P5655 | |
Leucin | Sigma-Aldrich | L6914 | |
Lysin | Sigma-Aldrich | L5501 | |
Magnesium acetate tetrahydrate (Mg(OAc)2 ) | Sigma-Aldrich | M5661 | |
Magnesium chloride(MgCl2) | Sigma-Aldrich | M2670 | |
Methionin | Sigma-Aldrich | M8439 | |
Microcentrifuge | Eppendorf | 5424 R | |
Mineral oil | Sigma-Aldrich | M5904 | |
Mini-PROTEAN Tetra Cell Systems | Bio-Rad | 1645050 | |
Multipurpose Centrifuge | Eppendorf | 5810 R | |
NaN3 | Sigma-Aldrich | S2002 | |
Nucleic Acid & Protein UV-Assay Measurements | IMPLEN | NanoPhotometer N60 | |
NucleoBond Xtra Maxi kit for transfection-grade plasmid DNA | MACHEREY-NAGEL | 740414.5 | |
Nunc-Immuno MicroWell 96 well polystyrene plates | Sigma-Aldrich | P8616 | |
PCR Thermal Cycler | Eppendorf | Mastercycler nexus | |
Peptone | Sigma-Aldrich | 83059 | |
Phenylalanin | Sigma-Aldrich | P8740 | |
Phosphoenolpyruvat (PEP) | GLPBIO | GC44635 | |
PMSF | Sigma-Aldrich | PMSF-RO | |
Polyethylene glycol 8000 (PEG 8000) | Sigma-Aldrich | 89510 | |
Potassium Acetate(KOAc) | Sigma-Aldrich | P5708 | |
Potassium chloride(KCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | P9541 | |
Potassium glutamate (K-glutamate) | Sigma-Aldrich | G1501 | |
Potassium hydroxide(KOH) | Sigma-Aldrich | 221473 | |
Prolin | Sigma-Aldrich | P8865 | |
Pyruvate kinase (PK) | Sigma-Aldrich | P9136 | |
Serin | Sigma-Aldrich | S4311 | |
Shaker | Zhichushakers | ZQZY-AF8 | |
Sodium chloride(NaCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | S5886 | |
Sodium hydroxide(NaOH) | Sigma-Aldrich | S5881 | |
Sucrose | aladdin | S112226 | |
Sulfuric acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 339741 | |
Syringe Filters | Jinteng | 0.45 μm | |
Test tube | Shuniu | 20 mL | |
TGX FastCast Acrylamide Kit, 12% | Bio-Rad | #1610175 | |
ThermoMixer | Eppendorf | ThermoMixer C | |
Threonin | Sigma-Aldrich | T8441 | |
Tris base | Sigma-Aldrich | V900483 | |
tRNA | Roche | 10109550001 | |
Tryptone | Sigma-Aldrich | T7293 | |
Tryptophan | Sigma-Aldrich | T8941 | |
Tyrosin | Sigma-Aldrich | T8566 | |
UTP Trisodium salt (UTP) | aladdin | U100365 | |
Vacuum Pump with Circulated Water System | Zhengzhou Greatwall Scientific Industrial and Trade Co.Ltd | SHB- | |
Valin | Sigma-Aldrich | V4638 | |
Vortex Mixers | Kylin-Bell | Vortex QL-861 | |
Water purification system | MerckMillipore | Direct ultrapure water (Type 1) | |
Yeast extract | Sigma-Aldrich | 70161 | |
β-mercaptoethanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 444203 |