Here, a protocol to apply voltage to solution during dynamic light scattering particle size measurements with the intent to explore the effect of voltage and temperature changes on polymer aggregation is presented.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a common method for characterizing the size distribution of polymers, proteins, and other nano- and microparticles. Modern instrumentation permits measurement of particle size as a function of time and/or temperature, but currently there is no simple method for performing DLS particle size distribution measurements in the presence of applied voltage. The ability to perform such measurements would be useful in the development of electroactive, stimuli-responsive polymers for applications such as sensing, soft robotics, and energy storage. Here, a technique using applied voltage coupled with DLS and a temperature ramp to observe changes in aggregation and particle size in thermoresponsive polymers with and without electroactive monomers is presented. The changes in aggregation behavior observed in these experiments were only possible through the combined application of voltage and temperature control. To obtain these results, a potentiostat was connected to a modified cuvette in order to apply voltage to a solution. Changes in polymer particle size were monitored using DLS in the presence of constant voltage. Simultaneously, current data were produced, which could be compared with particle size data, to understand the relationship between current and particle behavior. The polymer poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM) served as a test polymer for this technique, as pNIPAM’s response to temperature is well-studied. Changes in the lower-critical solution temperature (LCST) aggregation behavior of pNIPAM and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-block-poly(ferrocenylmethyl methacrylate), an electrochemically active block-copolymer, in the presence of applied voltage are observed. Understanding the mechanisms behind such changes will be important when trying to achieve reversible polymer structures in the presence of applied voltage.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a technique to determine particle size through the use of random changes in intensity of light scattered through solution1. DLS is capable of measuring aggregation of polymers by determining particle size. For this experiment, DLS was coupled with controlled temperature changes to observe when a polymer aggregates which is indicative of exceeding the lower critical solution temperature (LCST)2,3. Below the LCST, there exists one homogeneous liquid phase; above the LCST, the polymer becomes less soluble, aggregates, and condenses out of solution. An applied voltage (i.e., applied potential or electric field) was introduced across the scattering field to observe the effects of the electric field on aggregation behavior and LCST. The application of voltage in particle sizing measurements allows for new insights into particle behavior and subsequent applications in the fields of sensors, energy storage, drug delivery systems, soft robotics, and others.
In this protocol, two example polymers were used. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), or pNIPAM, is a thermal sensitive polymer, which contains both a hydrophilic amide group and a hydrophobic isopropyl group on the macromolecular chain4,5. Thermal-responsive polymer materials like pNIPAM have been widely used in controlled drug release, biochemical separation, and chemical sensors in recent years3,4. The LCST literature value of pNIPAM is around 30-35 °C4. pNIPAM is typically not electrochemically active. Therefore, as a second sample polymer an electrochemically-active block was added to the polymer. Specifically, ferrocenylmethyl methacrylate was used to create a poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-block-poly(ferrocenylmethyl methacrylate) block-copolymer, or p(NIPAM-b-FMMA)6,7. Both example polymers were synthesized by reversible addition fragmentation chain-transfer polymerization with controlled chain length8,9,10. The non-electrochemically active polymer, pNIPAM, was synthesized as 100 mer pure pNIPAM. The electrochemically active polymer, p(NIPAM-b-FMMA), was also 100 mer chain length, which contains 4% ferrocenylmethyl methacrylate (FMMA) and 96% NIPAM.
In this article, a protocol and methodology to study the effect of applied voltage on polymer aggregation is demonstrated. This method could also be extended to other applications of DLS, such as the analysis of protein folding/unfolding, protein-protein interactions, and agglomeration of electrostatically charged particles to name a few. The sample was heated from 20 °C to 40 °C to identify the LCST in the absence and presence of a 1 V applied field. Then, the sample was cooled from 40 °C to 20 °C without disrupting the applied field to study any hysteretic or equilibrium effects.
1. Example polymer preparations
2. DLS sample and cuvette preparation
NOTE: This section prepares the cuvette for applied voltage and the sample for DLS measurements.
3. DLS instrument controls and set up
NOTE: Three controls are recommended to complete before running each DLS experiment: (1) blank water solution; (2) a size standard; (3) measurement of the polymer before the start of a temperature ramp or applied voltage. Please consult the instrument manual before operation for guidance on preparing a sample, choosing settings, and assessing sample and data quality.
4. DLS SOP set up
NOTE: This section refers specifically to the temperature ramping operation of a Malvern Zetasizer NanoZS DLS instrument. Before starting experiments, it is strongly recommended to consult the instrument manual extensively for guidance on selecting a cell, preparing a sample, choosing measurement settings, and assessing sample and data quality.
5. Potentiostat Setup
NOTE: It is recommended to use the same computer for particle size and applied voltage operations to time-sync the data and thereby making it easier to evaluate later. Please consult the applied voltage instrument manuals for guidance on wiring set up, software consultation, and choosing appropriate parameters. A Gamry potentiostat was used in these experiments.
6. Data analysis
NOTE: This section details preliminary analysis to understand the data obtained.
The real-time file output of each run in the temperature ramp is presented as a table, as seen in Figure 3. Each record can be chosen independently to see the volume size (Figure 4) and correlation coefficient (Figure 5). Volume particle size distribution (PSD) is the most accurate data to interpret the overall distribution and LCST, but the quality of data should be assessed via correlation graph (Figure 5) to determine if any points should be excluded from analysis. Correlation graphs (Figure 5) that have a generally smooth curve are considered good quality, where non-smooth graphs or low-quality data should be considered for exclusion in the analysis. The curves at 24.5 °C have some bumps and minor peaks in the curves, but this can be attributed to the rapid change in polymer aggregation, and therefore these data were included. This confirms that DLS data collected in our modified system in the presence of voltage are of equivalent quality to normal DLS data.
As seen in Figure 7 (red lines), pNIPAM exhibited an LCST at 30 °C, a temperature close to the literature-described values4. Without voltage, pNIPAM was able to aggregate and disaggregate within the tested temperature range, returning to its original size and indicating expected reversibility. With voltage (Figure 7, black lines) pNIPAM went from being soluble to aggregating to a size of 2000 nm, then being reduced to a size of around 1000 nm during cooling, never returning to the original soluble state. Figure 8 shows the current data from pNIPAM with applied voltage and heating and cooling experiments corresponding to Figure 7 (black lines). The vertical red line at 26 °C is a key transition point of pNIPAM where a phase change is observed with DLS. The vertical line at 40 °C shows the maximum temperature in our measurement before the cooling cycle.
As seen in Figure 9 (red lines), the p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) polymer containing an electroactive FMMA block exhibited an LCST at 33 °C. Without voltage, p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) was able to aggregate and disaggregate, returning to its original size. With voltage (Figure 9, black lines), the LCST of p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) shifted to 28 °C. Again, with applied voltage, the p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) was not able to disaggregate and return to its original size during the cooling cycle. Figure 10 shows the current data from p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) with applied voltage and heating and cooling experiments corresponding to Figure 9 (black lines). The vertical red line at 28 °C is just above the phase change observed with DLS. The vertical line at 40 °C is at the maximum temperature in our measurement before cooling.
Evaluation of the current response data from the applied voltage is crucial to understanding the size response. If current is not carefully monitored, data will be misconstrued and potentially misunderstood. In one trial displayed in Figure 11, the voltage cut in and out as a result of accidental short circuiting. As a result of a short circuit, the voltage was only applied randomly and sporadically, and this resulted in a trend more similar to the no-voltage condition.
Figure 1: Disposable DLS cuvettes modified by adding copper tape to the sides to allow for applied voltage. The copper tape extends to the bottom and is wrapped around the top to ensure a good connection. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: A screenshot of DLS SOP setup, including sequence set up, size measurement specifications, and trend set up procedures. The screen depicted here acts as a main page where all other, more specific aspects and subpages of the data can be observed. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Example of record view of data collection in Zetasizer software. These records contain in-depth measurements of factors like intensity, volume size, correlation data, and quality of data. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Volume particle size distribution (PSD) for a single measurement at 31 °C of pNIPAM with 1 V of applied voltage. This screen can be accessed by selecting the desired data point found in the records view tab (Figure 4) and provides detailed sizing information. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Correlation data of an experiment with acceptable, reproducible correlation functions for each temperature in the presence of applied voltage. The correlation functions of three repeated runs at three different temperatures are plotted. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: DLS experiment setup using Gamry Potentiostat to apply constant voltage to the solution. This image depicts the wiring setup and general assembly of the circuitry required for this system. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Plot of pNIPAM particle size versus temperature. Black lines = applied voltage, red lines = no voltage, square data points = heating trend, triangle data points = cooling trend. Without applied voltage, the LCST was 30 °C during heating and 24 °C during cooling. With applied voltage, the LCST was 26 °C during heating and no disaggregation was observed during cooling. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Current data from pNIPAM with heating and cooling. The vertical red line at 26 °C is the LCST of pNIPAM where the phase change is observed in the DLS data (Figure 7). The vertical line at 40 °C shows the time at which heating was completed and cooling was initiated. The x-axis indicates time since start of experiment, as well as temperature at various time points. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: Plot of p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) particle size versus temperature. Black lines = applied voltage, red lines = no voltage, square data points = heating trend, triangle data points = cooling trend. Without applied voltage, the LCST was 33 °C during heating and 28 °C during cooling. With applied voltage, the LCST was 28 °C during heating and no disaggregation was observed during cooling. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 10: Current data from the p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) with heating and cooling. The vertical red line at 29 °C is just above the LCST of p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) where the phase change is observed in the DLS data (Figure 9). The x-axis indicates time since start of experiment, as well as temperature at various time points. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 11: Poorly connected circuit leading to error in data in a pNIPAM trial. The DLS data, pictured left, is similar to data from trials without voltage, which is explained by a disconnected and incomplete circuit. This theory of a poorly connected circuit is supported by the scattered current data, pictured right. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Applying voltage to either pNIPAM or p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) solutions changed the polymer aggregation behavior in response to temperature. With both materials, when an applied voltage was present, the polymers' volume size remained high even when the solutions were cooled below their LCST. This was an unexpected result, as the trials with no voltage showed the polymers returning to their original sizes. These experiments allow us to conclude that for our temperature range, and with an applied voltage, polymer aggregation is not fully reversible, regardless of electroactive monomers added to the pNIPAM.
Another interesting result can be seen upon further inspection of Figure 9 and p(NIPAM-b-FMMA) LCST changes. Without voltage, the maximum volume size is around 1000 nm, and aggregation is reversible. However, with applied voltage, the stable agglomeration is approximately 100 nm and non-reversible. This would indicate a new stable agglomeration state formed with applied voltage compared to the absence of voltage.
The current response from the constant applied voltage may also provide insights into aggregation response. Because the files are timestamped, the current with relative changes in temperature can be matched, although there is not equal spacing between the temperature and time due to the automatic optimization at each step based on the scattering intensity and attenuation settings in the DLS. Our data indicate the current increases with temperature, then starts decreasing immediately after the LCST is passed. Clear trends are associated with the approximate time of aggregation, showing a low resistance in solution, resulting in less current. During cooling, current increases, but does not increase as rapidly as it did during heating. The current data adds information and possible insight into the polymer behavior.
The methodology of applying a voltage to dynamic light scattering particle size distribution measurements was successful. Differences in polymer aggregation behavior associated with particle size distribution measurements were observed when an applied voltage was present during a temperature ramp trend compared to the no-voltage case. The observed behavior was only present when both an applied voltage and temperature ramp were used.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from NSF (CBET 1638893), (CBET 1638896), NIH (P20 GM113131), and the Hamel Center for Undergraduate Research at UNH. Further, the authors would like to recognize the assistance of Darcy Fournier for the assistance in cabling and Scott Greenwood for access to the DLS.
N-Isopropylacrylamide | Tokyo Chemical Industry CO., LTD | I0401-500G | |
1,4-Dioxane | Alfa Aesar | 39118 | |
2,2"-Azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) | SIGMA-ALDRICH | 441090-100G | |
Cuvette | Malvern | DTS0012 | |
Dynamic Light Scattering | Malvern | Zetasizer NanoZS | |
Ferrocenylmethyl methacrylate | ASTATECH | FD13136-1G | |
Phthalimidomethyl butyl trithiocarbonate | SIGMA-ALDRICH | 777072-1G | |
Potentiostat | Gamry | Reference 600 |