A protocol is presented for simultaneously extracting metabolites, proteins, and lipids from a single soil sample, allowing reduced sample preparation times and enabling multi-omic mass spectrometry analyses of samples with limited quantities.
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based integrated metaproteomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic (multi-omic) studies are transforming our ability to understand and characterize microbial communities in environmental and biological systems. These measurements are even enabling enhanced analyses of complex soil microbial communities, which are the most complex microbial systems known to date. Multi-omic analyses, however, do have sample preparation challenges, since separate extractions are typically needed for each omic study, thereby greatly amplifying the preparation time and amount of sample required. To address this limitation, a 3-in-1 method for the simultaneous extraction of metabolites, proteins, and lipids (MPLEx) from the same soil sample was created by adapting a solvent-based approach. This MPLEx protocol has proven to be both simple and robust for many sample types, even when utilized for limited quantities of complex soil samples. The MPLEx method also greatly enabled the rapid multi-omic measurements needed to gain a better understanding of the members of each microbial community, while evaluating the changes taking place upon biological and environmental perturbations.
Evaluating soil microbial communities has important implications for understanding carbon cycling and climate change. Recent studies have however highlighted difficulties, such as the lack of sequenced genomes for microbiota in various soil types and the unknown function of many of the proteins detected. These challenges result due to soil being the most complex microbial community known to date1,2,3. Multi-omic analyses, which combine results from metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, metaproteomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic studies, have recently been implemented in numerous soil studies to gain a greater understanding into the microbes present, while obtaining comprehensive information about the molecular changes taking place due to environmental perturbations1,4,5. One challenge with multi-omic studies is that the mass spectrometry (MS)-based metaproteomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic measurements typically require a specific extraction process for each omic to be MS compatible6,7,8,9. These precise procedures make their implementation extremely difficult or impossible when only a limited quantity of sample is available. These challenges have prompted us to investigate a simultaneous metabolite, protein, and lipid extraction (MPLEx) method capable of using smaller sample volumes or masses, improving accuracy, and providing faster sample preparations for all three analyses10. To date, there are no alternate soil extraction procedures that can achieve all of these goals.
To enable global multi-omic analyses of a single soil sample, an organic solvent extraction protocol based upon chloroform, methanol, and water separations was utilized10. This method was originally developed for total lipid extractions9,11 and more recently was amended for the simultaneous extraction of metabolites, proteins, and lipids from a single sample12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30, enabling less sample quantity and experimental variability10. In the MPLEx protocol, chloroform is not miscible with water, which provides the basis for the triphasic chemical separation of sample constituents into distinct fractions. The top aqueous phase therefore contains the hydrophilic metabolites, followed by a protein disk, and then a lipid layer in the bottom chloroform phase (Figure 1). When MPLEx is applied to most soils, particulate debris accumulates at the very bottom of the sampling tubes and can be discarded after all layers are collected. Each soil type can be different, however, and in highly organic soil such as peat, the soil debris stays in the middle layer and does not fall to the bottom of the sampling tube. MPLEx provides several advantages when isolating multiple molecule types from the same sample such as 1) smaller sample quantities can be used for multi-omic analyses, 2) multi-omic extractions from the same sample decrease overall experimental variability, and 3) greater numbers of samples can be prepared much faster for higher throughput studies10. Together these benefits are vital for providing better measurement capabilities for evaluating soil samples and their complex microbial communities.
NOTE: Very wet soils can be lyophilized prior to extraction without detriment to the effectiveness of the extraction. Wet soil can also be used but should be considered when adding reagents at specific ratios.
NOTE: It is recommended to use 20 g of dry soil weight per extraction, which must be split between two 50 mL tubes (maximum of 10 g soil per 50 mL tube). Extractions can be scaled up or down dependent upon available sample.
NOTE: Dry soil samples can be sieved through a 3 mm screen in order to homogenize and remove small roots and rocks. Do not sieve wet soil samples, as the sample will get stuck in the screen.
1. Soil Cell Lysis and Extraction of Metabolites, Proteins, and Lipids (Timing ~1 d)
2. Lipid Preparation (Timing ~20 min)
3. Metabolite Preparation and Derivatization (Timing ~5 h)
4. Protein Digestion (Timing ~1 d)
When the MPLEx protocol was used to extract molecules from Kansas native prairie soil (a Mollisol soil), the triplicate analyses provided results for 3376 peptides, 105 lipids, and 102 polar metabolites (all unique identifications). While the MPLEx protocol has been well-established for general extraction of lipids and metabolites12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,34, its comparison to common soil protein extraction methods for microbial analyses, such as soil protein extraction kits (see Table of Materials) and SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) extractions35, is further evaluated here. To assess these techniques, Kansas native prairie soil proteins were extracted with each approach and analyzed directly with reversed-phase LC-MS/MS using a UPLC system coupled with a hybrid quadrupole/Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Detailed information about the method parameters are available in the Supplementary Methods. The resulting experimental peptide MS/MS spectra from each extraction approach were compared with predicted peptide sequences from the representative Kansas native prairie metagenome2 using a stringent MS-GF+ spectral probability cutoff of 1×10-10 36,37 and a mass error cutoff of less than 5 ppm. It should be noted that the analytes extracted from soil using the MPLEx protocol are suitable for MS-based studies and other analytical techniques. When initially comparing three replicates of the known methods of MoBio and SDS, only 12% of the peptides overlapped between the two techniques showing the complexity of the microbial community and different extraction effects (Figure 2). Upon comparison of MPLEx with MoBio and SDS extracts, ~38% of the peptides observed using the MPLEx method were also detected when using the SDS and/or MoBio extractions (Figure 2). Considering the number of species in the Kansas soil bacterial community and its metagenome2, the overlap of peptide identifications is reasonable and due to its complexity, the combination of the approaches extracts more peptides than each alone35. Also, since these samples were unfractionated and analyzed by only 1-dimensional LC-MS/MS, the extremely high sample complexity was possibly causing some bias in detection due to different peptide concentrations extracted by each approach. The MPLEx protocol has also been applied to other soil types such as permafrost and wetlands, and in all cases the preliminary proteomic results are of similar quality to that of the Kansas native prairie soil data presented here.
The broad applicability of the MPLEx approach, has been previously evaluated using a diverse set of samples, including the archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, a unicyanobacterial consortium38, mouse brain cortex tissue, human urine, and leaves from Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 2)10. For all samples except A.thaliana, urea extractions are the most common way to extract proteins, so they were used as the control approach for evaluation. The A. thaliana MPLEx results were compared to an extraction performed with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) because plant leaves are rich in phenolic compounds that need to be removed prior to MS analyses39. In all cases, the number of proteins observed from the MPLEx method was similar to that for the controls10, indicating its utility for many different sample types. Also, there were no trends associated with the specific protein classes extracted in all the sample types (including soil). Therefore, the broad applicability of MPLEx to numerous biological and environmental systems makes it a promising approach.
Figure 1. A schematic showing the MPLEx process, in which metabolites, proteins and lipids are simultaneously extracted from the same soil sample for MS analyses. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Venn diagrams illustrating the peptide overlap for a diverse set of samples extracted using MPLEx and a standard urea-based protein extraction method normally performed. Data from MPLEx extraction of the archaeon S.acidocaldarius, the unicyanobacterial consortium, human urine, mouse brain cortex, and A.thaliana plant leaves adapted from Nakayasu, E. S. et al. 201610. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
It is important to note that not all laboratories will have the same available equipment so certain methods, for example the lysis step, can be adapted. Here we use vortexing and sonicating, however the use of a large 50 mL bead beater would work. If a lyophilizer with a collector temperature capable of -105 °C is not available, then samples can be dried under a nitrogen stream. Also soil types vary greatly and can include sand, silt, clay, peat, and loam (etc.), and they can also vary based on pH, salinity, and organic matter richness. Each of these variances can have an impact on the protocol, so it is important to be flexible and to make adjustments when needed. It is critical, however, that the ratios and percentages remain the same.
The MPLEx protocol shows great promise for application in numerous biological and environmental systems and the ability to enable multi-omic analyses of soil microbial communities. Previous comparisons of MPLEx to other extraction protocols for diverse systems illustrated a high degree of peptide overlap10. However, one observed limitation was that MPLEx was not applicable to blood plasma proteins that need to be depleted. In these cases, the precipitated proteins were not well recognized by the antibodies in the immunodepletion columns needed for broad coverage of the plasma proteome. Therefore, more standard extraction approaches should be used under these circumstances. One additional limitation noted for the MPLex extraction approach is that it does not discern between intracellular and extracellular protein, however this is true for all other soil protein extraction protocols as well.
In this manuscript, MPLEx provided results for 3376 peptides, 105 lipids, and 102 polar metabolites in Kansas native prairie soil using the extraction and analysis methods detailed in the protocol section. Better overlap was observed between the peptides extracted in the control and MPLEx approaches of individual systems compared to the soil microbial community (Figure 2). This is not a limitation, but one consequence of working with the extremely complicated soil microbial communities. These results are further noted as the well-known soil extraction techniques of SDS and MoBio did not overlap well either due to the great diversity and difficulties extracting soil proteins equally. Interestingly, the MPLEx protocol allowed the identification of more total peptides than either SDS or MoBio and also detected additional components not seen in either analysis.
These observations make MPLEx a very promising technique for working with small samples sizes, reducing overall multi-omic experimental variability, and reducing sample preparation time. The advantages possible with MPLEx look to enable the multi-omic capabilities and analyses required for large-scale microbial community studies.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to thank Nathan Johnson for his assistance in preparing the figures. This research was supported by the Pan-omics Program that is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research (Genomic Science Program), the Microbiomes in Transition (MinT) Laboratory Directed Research Development Initiative at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, as well as the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES022190) and NIH (P42 ES027704). KEBJ would like to thank R21 HD084788 for financial support to develop and validate novel multi-omic extraction techniques. This work was performed in the W. R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a DOE national scientific user facility at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is a multi-program national laboratory operated by Battelle for the DOE under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830.
Chloroform | Sigma-Aldrich | 650498 | Stored at -20°C !Caution chloroform has acute potential health effects, skin irritation and possible chemical burns, irritation to the respiratory system, may affect the kidneys, liver, heart. Wear suitable protective glasses, clothing and gloves, work in a fume hood. |
Methanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 34860 | Stored at -20°C !Caution Methanol may cause respiratory tract, skin and eye irritation, may damage the nerves, kidneys and liver. Wear suitable protective glasses, clothing and gloves, work in a fume hood. |
Purified water from Millipore | Milli-Q | Water purification system. | |
Sodium dodecyl sulfate | Sigma-Aldrich | L6026 | !Caution SDS causes acute toxicity and is flammable. It is a skin, eye and airway irritant. Wear gloves and safety glasses. |
Soil protein extraction kit | MoBio, NoviPure Soil Protein Extraction Kit, Qiagen | 30000-20 | |
DL-dithiothreitol | Sigma-Aldrich | 43815 | |
1M Trizma HCL | Sigma-Aldrich | T2694 | |
Trichloroacetic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | T0699 | !Caution TCA is caustic, toxic and may cause skin burns. Wear gloves and safety glasses. |
Acetone | Sigma-Aldrich | 650501 | Stored at -20°C !Caution Acetone may cause respiratory tract and skin and eye irritation. Flammable liquid and vapor. Wear safety glasses gloves and a lab coat, work in a fume hood. |
Urea | Sigma-Aldrich | 208884 | !Caution Urea is an eye and skin irritant, use gloves and safety glasses |
Ammonium bicarbonate | Fluka | 09830 | |
Trypsin | Promega | V528A | 20µg vials |
Bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit | Pierce | 23227 | |
Ammonium Formate | Sigma-Aldrich | 09735 | |
Acetonitrile | Sigma-Aldrich | 34998 | !Caution Acetonitrile is a skin and eye irritant. Highly flammable. Wear gloves and safety glasses. Work in a fume hood. |
Trifluoroacetic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | T6508 | !Caution TFA is extremely hazardous in case of skin contact, eye contact, ingestion and inhalation. May produce tissue damage particularly on mucous membranes of eyes, mouth and respiratory tract. Skin contact may produce burns. Wear gloves, lab coat, safety glasses and work in a fume hood. |
Methoxyamine hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | 226904 | !Caution Methoxyamine hydrochloride causes severe burns and serious damage to eyes, may cause sensitization by skin contact. Wear safety glasses, gloves and lab coat, work in a fume hood. |
Pyridine | Sigma-Aldrich | 270970 | !Caution Pyridine can cause skin and eye irritation, central nervous system depression. Vapor may cause flash fire. Wear safety glasses, gloves and lab coat, work in a fume hood. |
N-Methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide with 1% trimethylchlorosilane | Sigma-Aldrich | 69478 | !Caution MSTFA + 1% TMCS can cause skin corrosion, serious eye damage and specific target organ toxicity. Flammable liquid and vapor. Wear safety glasses, gloves and lab coat, work in a fume hood. |
Potassium chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | P9541 | |
Milli-Q water purification system | Millipore | model MPGP04001 | |
Vortex | Scientific Industries | SI-0236 | Vortex Genie 2 |
Probe sonicator | FisherBrand | model FB505 | |
Refrigerated centrifuge | Eppendorf | model 5810R | |
50mL tube swinging bucket rotor | Eppendorf | A-4-44 | |
50mL fixed angle rotor | Eppendorf | FA-45-6-30 | |
Balance | OHAUS | model V22PWE150IT | |
Serological pipette controller | Eppendorf | 12-654-100 | |
10mL, 25mL glass serological pipettes | FisherBrand | 13-678-27F, 13-678-36D | |
Thermomixer with Thermotop | Eppendorf | 5382000015, 5308000003 | |
0.9 – 2.0 mm blend stainless steel beads | NextAdvance | SSB14B | |
0.15 mm garnet beads | MoBio | 13122-500 | |
Magnetic stir plate | FisherBrand | 11-100-16SH | |
Magnetic stir bar | FisherBrand | 14512130 | |
pH paper strips, pH range 0–14 | FisherBrand | M95903 | |
15mL, 50mL conical polypropylene centrifuge tube | Genesee Scientific | 21-103 21-108 | chloroform compatible |
50mL vortex attachment | MoBio | 13000-V1-50 | |
Ice bucket | FisherBrand | 02-591-44 | |
27.25x70mm glass vials | FisherBrand | 03-339-22K | |
Breathe Easier plate membranes | Midwest Scientific | BERM-2000 | |
Alcohol wipes | Diversified Biotech | BPWP-1000 | |
Heater shaker incubator | Benchmark, Incu-Shaker Mini | ||
Analog rotisserie tube rotator | SoCal BioMed, LLC | 82422001 | |
Filter-Aided-Sample-Prep kit | FASP; Expedeon | 44250 | |
Microplate reader | Biotek, EPOCH | ||
-20 Degree Celsius Freezer | Fisher | 13986149 | |
-80 Degree Celsius Freezer | Stirling Ultracold | SU78OUE | |
Q-Exactive ion trap mass spectrometer | Thermo Scientific | ||
Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled with a single quadrupole 5975C mass spectrometer | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | ||
LTQ-Orbitrap Velo | Thermo Scientific | ||
Waters NanoEquityTM UPLC system | Millford, MA | ||
250mL media bottle | FisherBrand | 1395-250 | |
Waters vial | Waters | 186002805 | |
Glass MS sample vial and inserts | MicroSolv | 9502S-WCV, 9502S-02ND | |
Glass HPLC vial and snap caps | MicroSolv | 9512C-0DCV, 9502C-10C-B | |
HPLC 96-well plate | Agilent | 5042-6454 | |
Large glass vial 27.25x70mm | FisherBrand | 03-339-22K | |
Lyophilizer | Labconco | 7934021 | |
Polished stainless steel flat head spatula | Spoonula; FisherBrand | 14-375-10 | |
Kim wipes | Kimberly-Clark | 34721 | |
XBridge C18, 250×4.6 mm, 5 μM with 4.6×20 mm guard column | Waters | 186003117, 186003064 | |
Agilent 1100 series HPLC system | Agilent Technologies | G1380-90000 | |
1.7mL centrifuge tube | Sorenson | 11700 | |
Hamilton Glass Syringes, 5mL, 50µL and 250µL | Hamilton | 81517, 80975, 81175 | |
Pasteur Pipettes | FisherBrand | 13-678-20A | |
Pasteur Pipette Bulbs | Sigma-Aldrich | Z111597 | |
Bath Sonicator | Branson 1800 Ultrasonic Cleaner | ||
Vacuum Centrifuge | Labconco Centrivap Acid-Resistant Concentrator System | ||
MicroSpin Columns, C18 Silica | The Nest Group | SEM SS18V |