Spinal cord injury models should be highly reproducible. We demonstrate that the calibrated forceps compression model of spinal cord injury is an easy to use surgical method for generating reproducible injuries to the murine spinal cord.
Compression injuries of the murine spinal cord are valuable animal models for the study of spinal cord injury (SCI) and spinal regenerative therapy. The calibrated forceps model of compression injury is a convenient, low cost, and very reproducible animal model for SCI. We used a pair of modified forceps in accordance with the method published by Plemel et al. (2008) to laterally compress the spinal cord to a distance of 0.35 mm. In this video, we will demonstrate a dorsal laminectomy to expose the spinal cord, followed by compression of the spinal cord with the modified forceps. In the video, we will also address issues related to the care of paraplegic laboratory animals. This injury model produces mice that exhibit impairment in sensation, as well as impaired hindlimb locomotor function. Furthermore, this method of injury produces consistent aberrations in the pathology of the SCI, as determined by immunohistochemical methods. After watching this video, viewers should be able to determine the necessary supplies and methods for producing SCI of various severities in the mouse for studies on SCI and/or treatments designed to mitigate impairment after injury.
Animal models of SCI are valuable tools for assessing the efficacy of therapeutic paradigms designed to mitigate damage as a consequence of trauma to the spinal cord. Out of experimental necessity, these models must provide reproducible deficits in locomotor and sensory behaviors, be adjustable to produce injuries of differing severity, and demonstrate that injury severity correlates with the degree of neurological deficit observed. There are three main types of SCI with distinct features of injury: transection, contusion, and compression1. Briefly, a transection injury is a laceration to the spinal cord, a contusion injury arises from a brief, focal force applied to the dorsal spinal cord, and a compression injury occurs when an injurious force is applied to the spinal cord, and may also be referred to as a crush injury2.
Complete transection injuries are clinically rare in humans3, while contusion and compression injuries are more common. The compression injury produces an outcome similar to what is found in human SCI caused by, for example, tumor compression or other injurious compressive forces, and can be performed using a simple array of tools. Contusion and compression injuries are similar in that both are a compressive force and both have similar pathological features, such as cytoarchitectonic disorganization, and evoke similar endogenous responses to injury1,4. The contusion injury model usually applies this force to the dorsal spinal cord using a special apparatus in a manner similar to human cases of SCI resulting from an impaction of the spinal column2,5,6. In contrast, compression injuries can be generated by a variety of methods applying force dorsally or laterally. Methods of a compression injury include calibrated forceps7, aneurysm clips2, or placing a weight directly onto the spinal cord8. An advantage of the aneurysm clips is that they are able to provide different amounts of force9. The method of adding weights to the dorsal surface of the spinal cord directly8 requires the weight to be in place for 10 min, drastically increasing the length of surgery and resulting in inconsistencies due to placement of the weight and movement due to the respiration of the animal. Due to the small size of mice, situating animals in specialized apparatuses designed for use in rats, such as impactors for contusion injuries, may be difficult or result in inconsistent injuries7. However, mice are available in a wide range of transgenic strains, unlike larger animals such as rats or rabbits that are very useful for SCI research.
The Plemel method of using calibrated forceps to compress the spinal cord generates a reproducible SCI with a high degree of correlation between injury severity and neurological deficit7. This surgical SCI model is generated using a pair of No. 5 Dumont forceps modified to be held apart at a defined distance by either metal epoxy or some other obstruction to prevent complete closure. This engineered spacing ensures that the forceps will always close to a certain width in multiple surgeries and by different users. The advantage of the Plemel method is that the materials to produce the calibrated forceps can be easily purchased and assembled in the laboratory without need of specialized equipment. These forceps can withstand multiple rounds of autoclaving and sterilization, and the lack of a separate, bulky apparatus streamlines surgeries.
In this video we demonstrate the surgical use of a pair of calibrated forceps on the mouse spinal cord to generate a compression injury. We also address unique concerns related to the care of spinal cord injured laboratory animals to improve their quality of life post-operatively and reduce mortality.
All animal procedures and animal care methods should be approved by the institution's Institutional Animal Care and Usage Committee (IACUC).
1. Surgical Preparation
2. Dorsal Laminectomy
3. Spinal Cord Compression
4. Wound Closing
5. Post-operative Care
6. Assess Tissue Damage Resulting from Compression Injury
We performed a laminectomy on 12 mice (25 – 30 grams) as described above, followed by spinal cord compressions at 0.25 mm (n = 4), 0.35 mm (n = 4) and 0.55 mm (n = 4). We sacrificed animals at three (n = 6) and seven (n = 6) days post injury by intracardiac perfusion. The spinal cord was removed from the spinal column, and the tissue was prepared and processed as described above. Images of whole spinal cord were taken with a Leica EZ4 digital microscope and accompanying software. Images of spinal cord sections were taken at 2X magnification using an Olympus digital microscope and accompanying software.
We found that spinal cord compression produces an injury with the epicenter at the site of the compression (Figure 1). The effects of the injury extend several millimeters in the rostral and caudal directions. The severity of the injury increased as the distance between the spacers decreased (0.25 mm > 0.35 mm > 0.55 mm, Figure 2). Three days after compression there was blood at the epicenter of the injury and surrounding regions that was not present 7 days after injury. The 0.25 mm and 0.35 mm compressions produced a cavity, but not the 0.55 mm model. After 7 days, the dorsal and ventral white matter largely decreased in size at the epicenter, the grey matter organization was highly distorted, and cavitation was persistent. These cytoarchitectonical alterations are translated into motor and sensory alterations in animal behavior evaluated using appropriate tests such as the Basso Mouse Scale for Locomotor Function and the von Frey hair and ethyl chloride tests for sensory function as we demonstrated in previous publications8.
Figure 1. Representative images of the intact spinal cord both before and after injury. (A) Intact spinal cord. (B) Spinal cord after 0.35 mm compression. Arrows indicate border of injury. Asterisk indentifies epicenter of injury. D = Dorsal, L = Lateral. Scale bar: 0.50 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Representative images of mouse spinal cord before and after compression injury at varying compression widths. (A) Sagittal section of control spinal cord. (B) Coronal section at epicenter of a 0.35 mm SCI 7 days post compression injury (dpi). (C,E,G) Sagittal sections of spinal cords 3 dpi to a width of 0.25, 0.35 or 0.55 mm. (D,F,H) Sagittal sections of H&E stained spinal cords 7 dpi to a width of 0.25, 0.35 or 0.55 mm. Asterisk indentifies epicenter of injury. All sections stained with H&E. D = Dorsal, L = Lateral. Scale bar: 1.25 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The choice of an SCI model is important in designing experiments to determine the efficacy of treatments for human cases of SCI. Such experiments require an animal model that is highly reproducible to limit variability that may result in inconclusive data. They should also be of clinical relevance to accurately evaluate the human condition they are modeling. To that end, choosing a compressive or contusive injury over a transection is more clinically relevant3. However, impactors and weight drop apparatuses for contusion injuries require the use of expensive and complicated machinery. In contrast, the calibrated forceps model of SCI utilizes modified forceps that are easy to assemble from common laboratory materials, and the surgery requires only one additional step after a standard dorsal laminectomy to expose the spinal cord. However, one drawback of using this method is that the compressive force is always applied laterally rather than dorsally, as is most often seen in human clinical cases of SCI9, and compressive injuries generated using the method affect a greater rostral-caudal extent of tissue than contusion models1,2. This model has been demonstrated by the originators of the technique, and us, to generate reproducible SCI7,11, and is well suited to the size of mice. Furthermore, this injury model allows for animals to be evaluated after surgery and therapeutic treatments using a multitude of behavioral tests, such as the Basso Mouse Scale for Locomotion and the von Frey hair test, to verify that a cohort of animals share the same injury severity and neurological deficits7,11-13. These same techniques can also be used to evaluate the efficacy of treatments administered to animals during investigative studies, fulfilling the general criteria for animal models used to evaluate therapies for SCI2,7.
The method of producing the calibrated forceps for the injury model is simple and can be accomplished with a variety of different methods. We have used the spacer method11, as published by Plemel7, and have also modified forceps using a small screw, which not only provides an easier method for creating the compression device, but also allows for versatility in adjusting the final compression width, of benefit for comparative studies. The range of options in creating the forceps is nearly unlimited so long as the spacer(s) provide a stable means of always closing the forceps to the same distance and can withstand autoclaving and sterilization. The surgical methods described within this video are highly reproducible across users, however it is necessary that care be taken when performing the laminectomy and suturing the animal after the procedure has been performed so that the spinal cord does not suffer any additional compressive forces that may increase the injury severity and confound future experiments.
With proper training and practice, the calibrated forceps model of compression injury is well suited for performing SCI in mice that mimic clinical cases observed in humans2,3,7. Due to the ease of creating forceps, producing mice of differing degrees of injury severity can be easily done. This will be of great benefit for observing genetic effects on SCI of differing degrees of severity in transgenic mice as well as evaluating the efficacy of stem cell transplantations in mice. The majority of studies in the literature have been performed on rats due to their size, which generally makes surgeries easier to perform. However the method published by Plemel et al.7 and described by us in this video should enable SCI to be performed on mice with great ease and reproducibility.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Funding for this work was provided by Shriners Hospitals and CIRM fellowships to AMC and AM. We would also like to acknowledge Plemel et al.7 for first designing and publishing the calibrated forceps model.
Name | Company | Catalog No. |
Isoflurane Machine | Smiths Medical PM, Inc | VCT302 |
Isoflurane | Phoenix Pharmaceutical | NDC: 66794-013-25 |
Dissecting Scope | Seiler Precision Microscopes | SSI 202/402 |
Germinator-500 (tool sterilizer) | Thomas Scientific | 3885A20 |
Puralube (Eye Ointment) | Dechra | NDC 17033-211-38 |
Scalpel Handle (#3) | Fine Science Tools | 10003-12 |
Scalpel Blade (#11) | Fisher Scientific | 08-914B |
Retractor (Colibri ) | Fine Science Tools | 17000-03 |
Friedman Pearson Roungeur | Fine Science Tools | 16021-14 |
Vanna (Castroviejo) Scissors | Roboz | RS-5658 |
Tissue Forceps | Fine Science Tools | 11029-14 |
Laminectomy Forceps (Dumont #2) | Fine Science Tools | 11223-20 |
Dumont #5 Forceps | Fine Science Tools | 11252-20 |
Stapler | Fine Science Tools | 12031-07 |
Staples (wound clips) | Reflex7 | 203-1000 |
Sutures | Henry Schein | 101-2636 |
Needles (30 G x ½) | BD Biomedical | 305106 |
Syringe (1 ml) | BD Biomedical | 309659 |
Baytril (enrofloxacin) | Bayer | NADA 140-913 |
Buprenex (buprenorphine) | Cardinal Health | NDC 12496-0757-1 |