We have developed an in vitro malaria-HIV-1 co-infection model to study the impact of Plasmodium falciparum on the HIV-1 replicative cycle in human primary monocyte-derived macrophages. This versatile system can easily be adapted to other primary cell types susceptible to HIV-1 infection.
Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of the deadliest form of malaria, and human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) are among the most important health problems worldwide, being responsible for a total of 4 million deaths annually1. Due to their extensive overlap in developing regions, especially Sub-Saharan Africa, co-infections with malaria and HIV-1 are common, but the interplay between the two diseases is poorly understood. Epidemiological reports have suggested that malarial infection transiently enhances HIV-1 replication and increases HIV-1 viral load in co-infected individuals2,3. Because this viremia stays high for several weeks after treatment with antimalarials, this phenomenon could have an impact on disease progression and transmission.
The cellular immunological mechanisms behind these observations have been studied only scarcely. The few in vitro studies investigating the impact of malaria on HIV-1 have demonstrated that exposure to soluble malarial antigens can increase HIV-1 infection and reactivation in immune cells. However, these studies used whole cell extracts of P. falciparum schizont stage parasites and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), making it hard to decipher which malarial component(s) was responsible for the observed effects and what the target host cells were4,5. Recent work has demonstrated that exposure of immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells to the malarial pigment hemozoin increased their ability to transfer HIV-1 to CD4+ T cells6,7, but that it decreased HIV-1 infection of macrophages8. To shed light on this complex process, a systematic analysis of the interactions between the malaria parasite and HIV-1 in different relevant human primary cell populations is critically needed.
Several techniques for investigating the impact of HIV-1 on the phagocytosis of micro-organisms and the effect of such pathogens on HIV-1 replication have been described. We here present a method to investigate the effects of P. falciparum-infected erythrocytes on the replication of HIV-1 in human primary monocyte-derived macrophages. The impact of parasite exposure on HIV-1 transcriptional/translational events is monitored by using single cycle pseudotyped viruses in which a luciferase reporter gene has replaced the Env gene while the effect on the quantity of virus released by the infected macrophages is determined by measuring the HIV-1 capsid protein p24 by ELISA in cell supernatants.
Note: Experiments with HIV-1 and Plasmodium falciparum must be performed in the proper biosafety level laboratories (BSL2 for parasites, and BSL3 for HIV-1 and co-infections) and special precaution must be taken when using potentially infected human blood.
1. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) Purification (Based on 8 and 9)
2. Monocytes-Derived Macrophages (MDM) Differentiation (Based on 8 and 9)
3. Production and Quantitation of HIV-1 Viral Stocks
4. Culture of Plasmodium falciparum Parasites (Based on 13)
4.1 General culture and maintenance of parasites
4.2 Parasite synchronization
4.3 Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells (iRBC) purification
5. Exposure of MDM to Plasmodium falciparum
6. Infection of MDM with a Fully Replicative HIV-1
7. Infection of MDM with Single Cycle Virus Encoding Luciferase
8. Representative Results
Using our co-infection model, we show that exposure of P. falciparum to MDM decreases their susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. Indeed, a significant decrease (p<0.05; 2 way ANOVA, day 12) in the release of viral particles, as measured by HIV-1 p24 capsid protein in the supernatant, is observed in MDM pretreated with parasites (Figure 2A). This observation is confirmed in cells infected by viruses encoding a luciferase-reporter gene. MDM infection with such viruses harboring either exogenous VSV-G or HIV-1 glycoproteins leads to significantly (p<0.05, Student’s t-test) less luciferase production in cells exposed to P. falciparum (Figure 2B). It is noteworthy that VSV-G-pseudotyped viruses yielded much greater luciferase activity than their JRFLenv counterparts; this is due to the greater infection efficiency of VSV-G pseudotyped particles15. Given that parasite exposition to MDM impacts both types of viruses, this suggests that it influences some step in viral gene expression (Figure 2B). It is also important to mention that cell viability was not affected by MDM exposition to iRBC (data not shown), indicating that the inhibition observed is specific and not due to cell mortality.
Figure 1. A) Plate scheme for MDM infection with a fully replicative virus. Mock: uninfected cells. uRBC: cells exposed to uninfected red blood cells. iRBC: cells exposed to Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells. Bal: cells infected with NL4.3Balenv. Bal/uRBC: cells exposed to uRBC and infected with NL4.3Balenv. Bal/iRBC: cells exposed to iRBC and infected with NL4.3Balenv. B) Plate scheme for MDM infection with single cycle luciferase-encoding virus. Mock: uninfected cells. uRBC: cells exposed to uninfected red blood cells. iRBC: cells exposed to Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells. Δenv: cells infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+. JRFL: cells infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(JRFLenv). vsv-g: cells infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(vsv-g). Δenv/uRBC: cells exposed to uRBC and infected with NL4.3Luc+Env-R+. Δenv/iRBC: cells exposed to iRBC and infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+. JRFL/uRBC: cells exposed to uRBC and infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(JRFLenv). JRFL/iRBC: cells exposed to iRBC and infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(JRFLenv). vsv-g/uRBC: cells exposed to uRBC and infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(vsv-g). vsv-g/iRBC: cells exposed to iRBC and infected with NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(vsv-g).
Figure 2. A) Effect of Plasmodium falciparum on HIV-1 viral production in MDM. MDM were exposed to uRBC or iRBC at a ratio 75:1 (uRBC/iRBC:MDM) for 4 hr and extensively washed. Cells were infected with 10ng of NL4.3Balenv p24 for 2 hr. Viral production was monitored by ELISA for HIV-1 p24 in cell-free supernatant at different time points following initial viral infection. A representative experiment is shown. B) Effect of Plasmodium falciparum on HIV-1 viral transcription in MDM. MDM were infected with uRBC or iRBC at a ratio 75:1 (uRBC/iRBC:MDM). Cells were then infected with 10ng of p24 of single cycle virus (either NL4.3Luc+Env–R+, NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(JRFLenv) or NL4.3Luc+Env–R+(vsv-g)). Luciferase expression was evaluated in cell lysates 72 hr following initial virus infection. A representative experiment is shown.
We have illustrated here two different approaches to analyze the impact of the malaria parasite on the HIV-1 viral cycle, i.e. by analyzing either viral gene expression or progeny virus production and replication in monocyte-derived macrophages. Similar approaches have been used for other HIV-1-parasite co-infections16. However, these new data are a step forward in the investigation of malaria-HIV-1 co-infections. Indeed, Diou et al.8 studied the effect of hemozoin, not live parasites, on HIV-1 replication; in agreement with our results, they observed that hemozoin was itself sufficient to inhibit viral production by MDM, and not MDMs.
Using the described experimental layout, we observed that P. falciparum exerts a clear detrimental effect on the HIV-1 replicative cycle in macrophages: a significant inhibition of viral production is observed in macrophages pre-exposed to parasites (Figure 2A) and a specific impact of the parasite on viral transcription is illustrated in Figure 2B. However, we cannot leave out any additional effects of the parasite on viral entry or fusion (decapsidation), or on post-integration mechanisms, such as protein synthesis or viral particle assembly and budding. Furthermore, it is possible that a different impact on HIV-1 replication would be obtained if the parasite were added either at the same time or following MDM infection with the virus.
Our in vitro co-infection model provides a powerful tool to perform detailed investigations of HIV-1/P. falciparum interactions in the host cell. For example, the combination of this experimental layout with other techniques such as quantitative real time PCR, which can target and quantify specific steps in viral retrotranscription and viral genome integration to the host cell genome, are quite feasible and should yield further insights into the mechanisms involved in co-infections. Moreover, specific assays to evaluate early steps of the viral cycle (viral fusion, decapsidation, entry quantitation) can be applied to this basic protocol to further analyze the effect on viral replication. These modifications show how flexible this protocol is concerning HIV-1 quantitation and detection: indeed, even standard HIV-1 reverse transcriptase quantitation assays using tritium-labeled nucleotides could conceivably replace the ELISA for HIV-1 p24. In addition to MDM, we expect our system to be adaptable to other cell types relevant for HIV-1-malaria interactions, such as monocytes and dendritic cells. The fact that MDM are adherent cells facilitates their manipulation, allowing for easy washing out of iRBC that have not been taken in, or that are in contact with MDM, without eliminating any macrophages. Such an advantage would not apply to dendritic cells and monocytes, which are cultured in suspension, complicating the separation of uRBC and free iRBC with such cells and we are currently addressing this issue. Our system could also be useful to study more complex interactions such as the effects of Plasmodium-exposed monocyte-derived cells on the HIV-1 viral cycle in other immune cells such as CD4-positive T cells in co-culture experiments. Finally, our protocol could be suitable for experiments looking at the effect of P. falciparum iRBCs on HIV-1 reactivation in PBMC for HIV-1 infected individuals.
Ethics statement
Human PBMC were obtained from the blood of healthy donors, in accordance with the guidelines of the Bioethics Committee of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université Laval Research Center. A written consent was obtained from all blood donors.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through a Catalyst Co-infections and Co-morbidities grant. Human erythrocytes were provided by the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université Laval blood bank.
Name of the reagent | Company | Catalogue number | Comments |
RPMI 1640 | Multicell | 350-000-CL | |
PBS-endotoxin free | Sigma | D8662 | |
FBS | Wisent | 080-150 | Heat-inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min |
Accutase | eBiosciences | 00-4555-56 | |
Albumax II | Gibco | 11021-037 | Dissolved in RPMI 1640, filter-sterilized |
Lymphocyte separation medium | Multicell | 305-010-CL | |
White luminometer plates | Promega | Z3291 | |
CS Macs separation columms | Miltenyi Biotech | 130-041-305 | |
VarioMacs separator | Miltenyi Biotech | 130-090-282 | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin solution | Wisent | 450-201-EL | |
D-sorbitol | Sigma-Aldrich | S1876 | |
Cell scraper (25 cm) | Sarstedt | 83.1830 | |
24-Well Cell Culture Plates | BD Falcon | 353047 | |
150 x 20 mm culture dish | Sarstedt | 83.1803.003 | |
M-CSF | Genscript | Z02001 | |
HEPES | Sigma-Aldrich | H4034 | |
Human serum AB+ | Valley Biomedical | HP1022 | |
HBSS | Wisent | 311-505-CL | |
Gentamicin | Sigma-Aldrich | G1397 | |
Hypoxanthine | Sigma-Aldrich | H9636 | |
NaHCO3 | Sigma-Aldrich | S5761 | |
Luciferase Assay System | Promega | E1500 | |
Human red blood cells | Obtained purified from CHUL blood bank. |