Leucocyte recruitment to the liver occurs within the specialized channels of the hepatic sinusoids which are lined by unique hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells. Phase contrast microscopy of leucocyte recruitment across human hepatic sinusoidal endothelium under conditions of physiological shear stress can facilitate the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms which underlie this process.
Leucocyte infiltration into human liver tissue is a common process in all adult inflammatory liver diseases. Chronic infiltration can drive the development of fibrosis and progression to cirrhosis. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that mediate leucocyte recruitment to the liver could identify important therapeutic targets for liver disease. The key interaction during leucocyte recruitment is that of inflammatory cells with endothelium under conditions of shear stress. Recruitment to the liver occurs within the low shear channels of the hepatic sinusoids which are lined by hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (HSEC). The conditions within the hepatic sinusoids can be recapitulated by perfusing leucocytes through channels lined by human HSEC monolayers at specific flow rates. In these conditions leucocytes undergo a brief tethering step followed by activation and firm adhesion, followed by a crawling step and subsequent transmigration across the endothelial layer. Using phase contrast microscopy, each step of this 'adhesion cascade' can be visualized and recorded followed by offline analysis. Endothelial cells or leucocytes can be pretreated with inhibitors to determine the role of specific molecules during this process.
It is now well established that leucocyte recruitment in general follows the paradigm of the multistep adhesion cascade1. This involves the capture of leucocytes from flowing blood by endothelial cells lining the vessel wall. Initially, leucocytes undergo a rolling step which is mediated by selectin receptors or members of the immunoglobulin superfamily. This allows G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed on the leucocyte surface to be activated by chemokines presented on the endothelial glycocalyx. This leads to the alteration of integrin confirmation to a 'high affinity' state on the leucocyte surface and arrest and firm adhesion to the endothelium. Firm adhesion is then followed by shape change and crawling of the leucocyte on the vessel. The final step is transmigration through the endothelial monolayer, which can occur via paracellular or transcellular routes.
While the multistep adhesion cascade describes the general mechanism of leucocyte recruitment within the body there are organ specific differences. In the liver the majority of leucocyte recruitment occurs within the hepatic sinusoids in contrast to other organs where recruitment generally occurs within the post-capillary venules2. The hepatic sinusoids are a low shear environment and leucocytes undergo a brief tethering step prior to firm adhesion which is selectin independent2. These channels are lined by the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium which is discontinuous and contains fenestrae, open pores 100-200 nm in diameter, and lack a basement membrane3. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms that mediate leucocyte recruitment across human hepatic sinusoidal endothelium could identify organ specific therapeutic targets for inflammatory liver diseases.
Flow adhesion assays are essential tools in studying leucocyte recruitment. They allow the reconstruction of leucocyte recruitment in presence of shear stress to analyze adhesion under well-defined forces. The most frequent use for the assay is the study leucocyte adhesion to cultured endothelial monolayers or purified substrates. Commercially available flow chambers are used to perfuse cells under conditions of laminar flow between two flat surfaces and then visualize the dynamic process of adhesion on a microscope4. Previous groups have demonstrated that certain adhesive interactions only take place under flow and cannot be studied in static assays5,6.
We have used this technique to recapitulate the hepatic sinusoids and study leucocyte recruitment under conditions of low shear stress. Primary human HSEC are cultured in microslides and leucocytes can then be perfused over this monolayer at a rate of flow calculated to reproduce the shear stress within hepatic sinusoids. The shear stress is a stress that is applied parallel or tangential to a surface as opposed to normal stress which is perpendicular. Any fluid that is moving along a boundary will exert a shear stress on that boundary. Shear stress has been shown to be an essential component of lymphocyte transmigration7. Under these conditions each step of the adhesion cascade can be visualized by phase contrast microscopy. This method has allowed important insights into the recruitment of leucocytes within the liver including the study of conventional adhesion molecules8, the role of chemokines and chemokine receptors9-11, and atypical adhesion molecules such as the vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1)8,12 and common lymphatic and vascular endothelial receptor-1 (CLEVER-1)13. Whilst this assay has been mentioned in several of our group's publications, its description has been brief and we have taken this opportunity to provide a detailed step by step guide to help in troubleshooting and prevent technical errors when attempting the assay. Furthermore, we have recently changed the sourcing of microslide chambers which allows accurate alterations in shear stress. We believe this broadens the applicability of the assay to other endothelial and immune cells. The following method describes the preparation and technique for carrying out a flow based adhesion assay with human hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes.
1. Microslide Preparation
2. Seeding Cells in Microslides
3. Cytokine Stimulation of Cells
4. Isolation of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
5. Pretreatment of Endothelium or Leucocytes with Inhibitors
6. Setup of Flow Assay System
7. Flow Assay Technique and Recording of Adhesion for Analysis
This assay has the ability to visualize the multistep flow adhesion cascade and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms by comparing results of control experiments to those with molecular inhibitors. Various vascular beds can be recapitulated by incorporating specific endothelial cells and altering shear stress conditions.
Each step of the adhesion cascade can be analyzed offline by following the recording method outlined in the protocol. The first step of the adhesion cascade is the rolling of leucocytes which can be expressed as a percentage of total adherent cells. Offline analysis allows the number of adherent cells to be enumerated in each recorded field during the leucocyte bolus. Playback of the image allows the comparison of cells that are firmly adherent and those that are undergoing a rolling motion across the endothelium. Rolling motion can be visualised using this technique, each field is recorded for at least 10 sec. Rolling cells are identified by their reduced velocity over the endothelial surface compared to flowing cells. This behaviour must be demonstrated for at least 5 sec without detachment. The adhesion cascade within the hepatic sinusoids takes place in a low shear environment and in vivo studies have confirmed minimal rolling with only a brief tethering step. We have confirmed that the flow assay reflects the environment of the hepatic sinusoids by demonstrating that fewer than 10% of adherent leucocytes persistently roll over stimulated HSEC in these assays.
The next step of the adhesion cascade is firm adhesion. Total adherence can be calculated from the second stage of recording during the wash buffer bolus (step 7.3). Offline analysis allows the total number of firmly adherent cells to be counted in each field (Figure 5). Firmly adherent cells are defined as cells that are stationary or shapechanged with slow crawling behavior. The average number of cells per field can then be calculated. This figure can then be used, in conjunction with the total surface area of the field of view (determined using a graticule or equivalent), concentration of lymphocytes (typically 1 x 106 cells/ml) and the flow rate to express the extent of lymphocyte adherence as adherent cells/mm2/106 cells perfused.
Studying the pattern of adhesion involves the analysis of the last two steps of the adhesion cascade including shape-change, crawling and transendothelial migration. Leucocytes adherent to the upper surface of the HSEC monolayer appear phase-bright whilst those that have migrated through the monolayer appear phase dark (Figure 6). The cells can then be classified as exhibiting 'static' adhesion (nonmigrated/ round), 'shape-changed' morphology or as 'migrated' and individual categories are then expressed as a percentage of the total adhesive population.
Figure 1. Monolayer of primary human hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells within flow chamber. A) Microslides filled with media containing monolayer of endothelial cells prior to commencement of flow adhesion assay. B) Phase contrast image of confluent endothelial monolayer, endothelial cells should be seeded in microslide which have been precoated (for human hepatic endothelial cells this should be with rat tail collagen type 1) and it is essential that the endothelial cells are healthy in culture and confluent. Click here to view larger image.
Figure 2. Flow assay chamber. A flow assay chamber set-up can be seen here, it consists of a transparent chamber which is mounted on an inverted microscope. A heater is placed in the chamber and should be thermostatically controlled to maintain a temperature of 37 °C. There should be ports available to connect silicone tubing from a microslide within the chamber to a syringe pump which is located outside. The microslide is placed directly on the microscope stage. Click here to view larger image.
Figure 3. Syringe Pump. A syringe pump is connected via silicone tubing to the flow chamber. The pump is set to a specific withdrawal rate depending on the desired shear stress required for the assay. Click here to view larger image.
Figure 4. Connecting valve to flow chamber. A) An electronic solenoid valve allows switching between two syringe barrels containing either cells or media with virtually no dead space. B) Once the valve is flushed and the two barrels are set up, the silicone tubing from the valve is connected to the flow chamber. It is critical that when connecting the adaptor on the silicone tubing to the port on the flow chamber there is a liquid/liquid interface. Click here to view larger image.
Figure 5. Measurement of total leucocyte adherence. During the last two minutes of the wash buffer bolus step (as outlined in the protocol), a minimum of ten random fields should be recorded. These can be analyzed off-line and the total number of firmly adherent cells can be counted in each field. Total adhesion of leucocytes can be compared between control chambers and those pretreated with blocking antibodies, here we show a representative field from a control slide and a slide pretreated with intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) blocking antibody. Arrows have been added to highlight the adherent leukocytes, in the representative field from the control slide there are a total of 25 leukocytes identified and in the ICAM-1 block slide there are a total of 13 leukocytes identified. Scale bars = 100 µm. Click here to view larger image.
Figure 6. Analysis of the pattern of leucocyte adhesion on endothelial monolayers by phase contrast microscopy. Offline analysis of recorded fields can also be used to study the direction and velocity of leucocyte adhesion. Specific steps of the adhesion cascade can be visualized and quantified using phase contrast imaging. Phase bright cells which are firmly adherent but not activated can be termed 'round' adhesion, the cells which are activated and phase bright can be termed 'shape changed' and the cells which are phase dark are the cells which have undergone transendothelial migration and can be termed 'migrated'. The image shows examples of each pattern of adhesion. Click here to view larger image.
The most critical step for successfully performing a flow assay is ensuring that a healthy and confluent monolayer of endothelial cells is ready prior to the flow adhesion assay. Primary endothelial cells can be difficult to culture and sensitive to alterations in culturing methods. It is important that 1) flow chambers are adequately and uniformly coated with endothelial cells in a monolayer; for HSEC we use rat tail collagen type I but this may differ for other endothelial populations, 2) culture medium is appropriate for the cell type, for HSEC we have described our complete medium in the protocol section. Other vital steps include setting the syringe pump at the appropriate rate to reflect physiological levels of shear stress.
During the flow assay it is necessary to prevent air bubbles within the flow circuit which can damage the endothelial monolayer or strip immune cells from the endothelial surface. This can be prevented by ensuring that all silicone tubing and adaptors are perfused with wash buffer prior to connection, that all air bubbles are removed and that the media are prewarmed prior to use. When connecting the adaptors to the ports on the microslide it is very important that there is a liquid/liquid interface during connection, if there is any air then this will form an air gap within the system which will disrupt the endothelial monolayer during the syringe withdrawal step. The leucocyte solution in the syringe barrel needs regular agitation to ensure that the cells do not settle, thus maintaining a constant cell density throughout the experiment.
During the recording steps it is important to ensure the image of the endothelial layer is adequately focused and clear to allow accurate offline analysis, and that during the second step of the flow assay (post leucocyte bolus) that enough time is left during the wash buffer phase before recording is recommenced to ensure that all nonadherent leucocytes are removed. Similarly it is essential to use endothelial cells in a monolayer of appropriate density to prevent loss of cells which can interfere with flow patterns in narrow capillaries and also can be hard to discriminate from larger adherent leucocytes under phase contrast microscopy. We have described optimal seeding density for human hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells but this may vary between different endothelial populations and species.
Significant progress has been made in studying leucocyte recruitment in animal models with intravital microscopy. The major advantage of the flow adhesion assay method is that leucocyte recruitment can be studied in a binary system with primary human endothelial cells. Furthermore, these interactions can be studied under physiological relevant levels of shear stress. It is important to confirm findings of intravital studies in animals with human cellular systems as there may be differences in endothelial properties between species. One of the limitations of the flow assay is that leucocyte recruitment is being studied in a unicellular environment of the endothelial monolayer. In addition once the leucocytes have adhered and transmigrated across the endothelium they may not be in present in sufficient numbers to be isolated and subjected to downstream processes.
Despite these limitations, once the flow adhesion assay has been mastered it can be developed to perform further analysis of the leucocyte adhesion cascade and adapted to recapitulate a multicellular environment. Prolonged recording of single fields and the use of tracking software can be used to analyze crawling behavior of the leucocytes. Furthermore upon completion of the flow assay the microslides can be interrogated using laser scanning confocal microscopy and immunofluorescent labeling to study adhesion and transmigration in more detail. Additionally, we have previously developed an in vitro model where flowing leucocytes could interact with hepatic endothelium conditioned by the presence of hepatocytes. This assay can also be developed to study subpopulations of leucocytes: our group has performed studies with subsets such as regulatory T cells, B cells, and liver infiltrating leucocytes.
These studies are evidence that the flow adhesion assay is a powerful tool to study general and organ specific leucocyte recruitment in human systems.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
S.S. is funded by a Wellcome Trust Intermediate Clinical Fellowship, C.W. by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant.
Name of the reagent/ Equipment | Company | Catalog number | Comments |
Six channel μ-slide VI 0.4 flow chamber | Ibidi | 80601 | Other channel size and pre-coated slidess are available depending on assay requirements. |
Flow adaptors μ-slide VI 0.4 | Ibidi | 80646 | |
Flow assay chamber | Solent Scientific | 33-3322 | These chambers are custom made by the company dpending on the model of microscope and accessories. |
Inverted Microscope IX2 | Olympus, UK | Model IX50 | |
Harvard Syringe Pump | Harvard Apparatus, UK | 702101 | |
Electronic solenoid valve | Lee Products Limited,UK | Part Number LFYA1226032H | |
Silicon Tubing large | Fisher Scientific | FB50855 | 2mm Inner diameter, 4mm Outer diameter |
Silicone Tubing-small | Fisher Scientific | FB50853 | 1mm Inner diameter, 3mm Outer diameter |
Harvard Glass Syringe | Harvard Apparatus, UK | 55-0962 | |
Cell separation medium/Lympholyte | VH Bio | CL-5020 | |
Rat Tail Collagen | Sigma Aldrich | C3867-1VL |