Full-length individual proviral sequencing (FLIPS) provides an efficient and high-throughput method for the amplification and sequencing of single, near full-length (intact and defective) HIV-1 proviruses and allows for determination of their potential replication-competency. FLIPS overcomes limitations of previous assays designed to sequence the latent HIV-1 reservoir.
The Full-Length Individual Proviral Sequencing (FLIPS) assay is an efficient and high-throughput method designed to amplify and sequence single, near full-length (intact and defective), HIV-1 proviruses. FLIPS allows determination of the genetic composition of integrated HIV-1 within a cell population. Through identifying defects within HIV-1 proviral sequences that arise during reverse transcription, such as large internal deletions, deleterious stop codons/hypermutation, frameshift mutations, and mutations/deletions in cis acting elements required for virion maturation, FLIPS can identify integrated proviruses incapable of replication. The FLIPS assay can be utilized to identify HIV-1 proviruses that lack these defects and are therefore potentially replication-competent. The FLIPS protocol involves: lysis of HIV-1 infected cells, nested PCR of near full-length HIV-1 proviruses (using primers targeted to the HIV-1 5' and 3' LTR), DNA purification and quantification, library preparation for Next-generation Sequencing (NGS), NGS, de novo assembly of proviral contigs, and a simple process of elimination for identifying replication-competent proviruses. FLIPS provides advantages over traditional methods designed to sequence integrated HIV-1 proviruses, such as single-proviral sequencing. FLIPS amplifies and sequences near full-length proviruses enabling replication competency to be determined, and also uses fewer amplification primers, preventing the consequences of primer mismatches. FLIPS is a useful tool for understanding the genetic landscape of integrated HIV-1 proviruses, especially within the latent reservoir, however, its utilization can extend to any application in which the genetic composition of integrated HIV-1 is required.
Genetic characterization of the latent HIV-1 reservoir, which persists in individuals on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART), has been vital to understanding that the majority of integrated proviruses are defective and replication-incompetent1,2. During the process of reverse transcription, errors are introduced into the integrated proviral sequence. Some mechanisms that generate defective proviral sequences include the error-prone HIV-1 reverse transcriptase enzyme3, template switching4, and/or APOBEC-induced hypermutation5,6. Two recent studies have found that approximately 5% of HIV-1 proviruses isolated from individuals on long-term ART are genetically intact, and potentially replication-competent, and may contribute to the rapid rebound in HIV-1 plasma levels upon cessation of ART1,2,7. Previous studies have identified that replication-competent HIV-1 proviruses persist in naïve and resting memory CD4+ T cell subsets (including central, transitional and effector memory T cells), indicating the importance of targeting these cells in future eradication strategies2,8,9.
Early insights into the distribution, dynamics and maintenance of the latent HIV-1 reservoir were achieved through utilization of single-proviral sequencing (SPS) methods that genetically characterize sub-genomic regions of the HIV-1 genome10,11,12,13. SPS is a versatile tool, able to sequence a single HIV-1 provirus from within a single infected cell. However, SPS is unable to determine the replication-competency of proviruses, since it only sequences sub-genomic regions and misses proviruses that contain large deletions within primer binding sites. A previous study has demonstrated that SPS overestimates the size of the replication-competent reservoir by 13- to 17-fold through selectively sequencing intact sub-genomic regions2.
To address the limitations of SPS, Ho et al.4 and Bruner et al.1 developed assays to sequence near full-length HIV-1 proviruses. This allowed the frequency of genetically intact, and potentially replication-competent, HIV-1 proviruses in individuals on long-term ART to be determined. These assays amplified and sequenced (via Sanger sequencing) sub-genomic regions that were then assembled to obtain a sequence of the (intact or defective) HIV-1 provirus. Three limitations of this approach are: 1) the use of multiple sequencing primers increases the risk of unintentionally introducing defects into the proviral sequence, 2) primer mismatches may prevent amplification of particular proviruses, and 3) often the entire proviral sequence cannot be resolved due to the technicality of these methods.
To overcome the limitations of existing full-length HIV-1 proviral sequencing assays, we developed the Full-Length Individual Proviral Sequencing (FLIPS) assay. FLIPS is a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay which amplifies and sequences near full-length (intact or defective) HIV-1 proviruses in a high-throughput and efficient manner. FLIPS provides advantages over previous assays, as it limits the number of primers utilized; therefore, it decreases the chance of primer mismatches, which may limit the population of proviruses captured or unintentionally introduce defects into a viral sequence. FLIPS is also less technically challenging than previous assays and involves 6 main steps: 1) lysis of HIV-1 infected cells, 2) amplification of single HIV-1 proviruses via nested PCR performed at limiting dilution using primers specific for the highly conserved HIV-1 5' and 3' U5 LTR region (Figure 1A), 3) purification and quantification of amplified products, 4) library preparation of amplified proviruses for NGS, 5) NGS, and 6) de novo assembly of sequenced proviruses to obtain contigs of each individual provirus.
Sequences generated by FLIPS can undergo a stringent process of elimination to identify those which are genetically intact and potentially replication-competent (Figure 1C)2. Genetically intact proviruses lack all known defects which result in generation of a replication-incompetent provirus. These defects include: inversion sequences, large internal deletions, hypermutation/deleterious stop codons, frameshifts, or mutations in the 5' packaging signal or major splice donor (MSD) site.
Figure 1: Critical steps in the full-length individual proviral sequencing (FLIPS) assay. (A) HIV-1 DNA genome with primer binding sites in 5' and 3' U5 LTR regions used by FLIPS to amplify near full-length (defective and intact) HIV-1 proviruses via nested PCR. (B) Layout of a 96-well PCR plate containing 80 sample wells (20 wells for each dilution), 4 negative control wells, and 1 positive control well. (C) Process of elimination used to identify genetically intact, and potentially replication-competent, HIV-1 proviruses. This figure has been modified from Hiener et al.2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
All methods described here have been approved by the institutional review boards at the University of California San Francisco and the Western Sydney Local Health District, which includes The Westmead Institute for Medical Research.
1. Lysis of HIV-1-infected Cells
NOTE: Cells may be isolated from peripheral blood, leukapheresis samples, bone marrow biopsy, or tissue biopsy. Cell populations may be sorted using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
2. Amplification of Single HIV-1 DNA Proviruses via Nested PCR
Reagent | Final Concentration | Volume for PCR1 plate (µL) | Volume for PCR2 plate (µL) |
Forward Primer | 1 µM | 32.3 | 23.8 |
Reverse Primer | 1 µM | 32.3 | 23.8 |
Buffer (10x) | 1x | 323 | 238 |
MgSO4 (50 mM) | 2 mM | 129.2 | 95.2 |
dNTP (10 mM) | 0.2 mM | 64.6 | 47.6 |
DNA polymerase (5 U/µL) | 0.025 U/µL | 16.2 | 11.9 |
Ultrapure H2O | 2632.5 | 1939.7 |
Table 1: Reagents and volumes for PCR master mixes.
NOTE: The primers used for PCR1 are:
BLOuterF: 5’-AAATCTCTAGCAGTGGCGCCCGAACAG-3’ (HXB2 position 623-649)
BLOuterR: 5’-TGAGGGATCTCTAGTTACCAGAGTC-3’ (HXB2 position 9662-9686)
NOTE: The primers used for PCR2 are:
275F: 5’-ACAGGGACCTGAAAGCGAAAG-3’ (HXB2 position 646-666)
280R: 5’-CTAGTTACCAGAGTCACACAACAGACG-3’ (HXB2 position 9650-9676)
3. DNA Purification and Quantification
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
A | Standard (1 ng/mL) | Standard (0.1 ng/mL) | Standard (0.01 ng/mL) | Standard (0.001 ng/mL) | Blank | |||||||
100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL buffer | ||||||||
B | Standard (1 ng/mL) | Standard (0.1 ng/mL) | Standard (0.01 ng/mL) | Standard (0.001 ng/mL) | Blank | |||||||
100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL buffer | ||||||||
C | Standard (1 ng/mL) | Standard (0.1 ng/mL) | Standard (0.01 ng/mL) | Standard (0.001 ng/mL) | Blank | |||||||
100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL | 100 mL buffer | ||||||||
D | Sample 1: | Sample 2: | Sample 3: | Sample 4: | Sample 5: | Sample 6: | Sample 7: | Sample 8: | Sample 9: | Sample 10: | Sample 11: | Sample 12: |
1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | |
E | Sample 1: | Sample 2: | Sample 3: | Sample 4: | Sample 5: | Sample 6: | Sample 7: | Sample 8: | Sample 9: | Sample 10: | Sample 11: | Sample 12: |
1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | |
F | Sample 1: | Sample 2: | Sample 3: | Sample 4: | Sample 5: | Sample 6: | Sample 7: | Sample 8: | Sample 9: | Sample 10: | Sample 11: | Sample 12: |
1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | 1 mL DNA + 99 mL buffer | |
G | ||||||||||||
H |
Table 2: Example layout of 96-well plate for quantification of dsDNA.
4. Sequencing Library Preparation
5. De Novo Assembly of Sequenced HIV-1 Proviruses
NOTE: To obtain the genetic sequence of each amplified provirus, contigs are assembled de novo from the paired-end reads. Many platforms (e.g., CLC Genomics Workbench14), allow the design of custom workflows for de novo assembly. Other open source software such as FastQC15, Trimmomatic16, Cutadapt17, and FLASH18 can also be utilized for processing reads, as well as tools such as Bowtie219 and SPAdes20 for read mapping and de novo assembly. The steps for the de novo assembly of HIV-1 contigs using a specific commercial platform (see the Table of Materials) are outlined below (Figure 2). Customized workflow file is available upon request.
6. Determining Potential Replication Competency of HIV-1 Proviral Sequences
NOTE: To identify sequences of genetically intact, and potentially replication-competent, HIV-1 proviruses a stringent process of elimination is followed (Figure 1C). Proviral sequences lacking inversions, large internal deletions, deleterious stop codons/ hypermutation, frameshift mutations, and/or defects in the MSD site or packing signal are considered genetically intact and potentially replication-competent.
The FLIPS assay amplifies and sequences single, near full-length HIV-1 proviruses. The protocol involves 6 steps to obtain near full-length proviral sequences. These steps include: lysis of infected cells, nested PCR of full-length (intact and defective) HIV-1 proviruses, DNA purification and quantification, sequencing library preparation, NGS, and de novo assembly of sequenced proviruses. The end of each step can be considered a checkpoint in which the quality of the product (e.g. amplified DNA, purified DNA, sequencing library or sequence) can be assessed prior to the next step. An overview of the assessment performed at the end of each step and the expected results is outlined below.
Following nested PCR, amplified products are run on a 1% agarose gel (Figure 3). The initial quality of the PCR can be determined by inspection of negative and positive controls. Negative control wells containing amplified product indicate contamination and positive control wells absent of amplified product indicate insufficient amplification. Next, wells containing amplified product are selected for sequencing. To avoid wells containing mixtures of multiple amplified proviruses, only wells containing amplified product run at end-point dilution are considered for sequencing. According to Poisson distribution, the end-point dilution is found when 30% of wells are positive for amplified product. At this dilution, there is an 80% chance these wells contain a single amplified provirus. Additionally, wells containing multiple amplified proviruses of different lengths can be visualized at this stage as multiple bands will appear on the gel. These wells should not be selected for sequencing (Figure 3).
Following purification of the amplified proviruses selected for sequencing, quantification ensures no proviral DNA is lost during the purification stage. If the DNA concentration of an amplified provirus is <0.2 ng/µL, the remaining sample in the PCR2 plate can be purified. A similar checkpoint occurs following library preparation, in which each individual library is quantified. This ensures individual proviruses have been appropriately fragmented, tagged and amplified prior to sequencing. Individual proviral libraries are pooled in equimolar amounts to a final library concentration of 4 nM (or as specified by the sequencing provider). If the concentration of an individual proviral library is too low, it can be excluded from the sequencing library pool, or the individual library prepared again. A final check of the concentration of the pooled library is performed prior to sequencing along with confirming the average fragment lengths.
Quality control steps before the de novo assembly stage ensures the quality of the reads used to assemble the final proviral contig. These steps include: removal of adapter sequences, trimming of 5' and 3' nucleotides, a stringent quality limit, and disregarding short reads. CLC Genomics Workbench can provide quality control reports that can be used before to assess the initial quality of the reads and guide trimming settings, and then after to determine if the trimming was sufficient to remove low quality regions. Additionally, for de novo assembly, the quality of the assembled contigs can be assessed for sufficient depth (>1000X) and evenness of coverage (Figure 4A). Mixed populations can also be identified at this stage. Mixtures of multiple full-length (~9 kb) proviruses are identified through the presence of multiple SNPs with a frequency of greater than 40%, whereas mixtures of short (containing a large internal deletion) and full-length proviruses can be identified by uneven read coverage following mapping to a full-length reference from the same participant (Figure 4B).
Depending on the application, the final alignment can be visualized using tools such as ggtree available as a package in "R: A language and environment for statistical computing"27. In a recent study, FLIPS was utilized to sequence HIV-1 proviruses from naïve, central, transitional, and effector memory CD4+ T cells isolated from individuals on long-term ART, with the aim to identify if particular cell subsets showed higher proportions of genetically intact and potentially replication-competent HIV-12. Here, visual representation of the sequences isolated from one participant of this study (participant 2026) is presented (Figure 5). In this participant, the majority (97%) of sequences were defective, with intact sequences found in effector and transitional memory CD4+ T cells. This visualization tool is useful for showing the number of sequences with large internal deletions and their position in the genome. It can be annotated further to indicate sequences with deleterious stop codons, frameshift mutations, and deletions/mutations in the MSD site and/or packaging signal.
One application of the FLIPS assay is the identification of genetically intact and potentially replication-competent HIV-1 proviruses. In a recent study of 531 sequences isolated from CD4+ T cells from 6 participants on long-term ART, 26 (5%) genetically intact HIV-1 proviruses were identified2. The remaining defective proviruses included those with inversion sequences (6%), large internal deletions (68%), deleterious stop codons/hypermutation (9%), frameshift mutations (1%), and defects in the packaging signal and/or mutations in the MSD site (11%).
Figure 2: Overview of workflow for de novo assembly of HIV-1 proviruses. The major steps in the workflow include: 1) sequence read quality control, 2) merging overlapping pairs, 3) de novo assembly, and 4) remapping and consensus building have been colored red, blue, green and orange, respectively. This figure has been modified from Hiener et al.2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Example agarose gel of PCR amplified HIV-1 proviruses. Wells 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 10 contain amplified HIV-1 proviruses. Well 10 contains a provirus with a large internal deletion, well 2 contains co-amplification of two HIV-1 proviruses of different lengths (mixture), and well 12 contains positive control. Note the percent of wells containing amplified product is 60%, which is above the percentage required to isolate single templates. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Example output of read mapping. (A) Example demonstrating even coverage due to the amplification of a single full-length HIV-1 provirus. Following de novo assembly, all reads are mapped to the assembled contig to produce a consensus sequence. The software platform allows the mapped reads to be inspected for sufficient and even coverage. (B) Example demonstrating co-amplification of two HIV-1 proviruses of different lengths (mixture). To determine mixtures, reads are mapped to a full-length (~9 kb) reference sequence from the same participant and read mapping inspected. The presence of uneven coverage indicates a mixture. This figure is reproduced with permission from Qiagen14. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Example visualization of HIV-1 proviral sequences isolated from CD4+ T cell subsets from an individual on long-term ART. Individual HIV-1 proviral sequences are represented by horizontal lines. This figure has been modified from Hiener et al.2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The FLIPS assay is an efficient and high-throughput method for amplifying and sequencing single, near full-length HIV-1 proviruses. Multiple factors and critical steps in the protocol that influence the number and quality of the sequences obtained have been identified. Firstly, the number of cells and the HIV-1 infection frequency of the cell population influence the number of proviruses amplified. For example, in a previous publication, approximately half as many sequences were obtained from the same number of naïve CD4+ T cells compared to effector memory CD4+ T cells. This is because naïve cells typically have a lower infection frequency than effector memory cells2. Secondly, cell lysis is preferable to column-based extraction methods for obtaining genomic DNA as there is no risk of losing DNA in the extraction process. Lastly, as with any PCR-based assay, preventing contamination is critical. Separated clean areas should be designated for preparing master mixes, handling genomic DNA, adding positive controls, DNA purification and quantification, and library preparation. This is particularly important for single-copy assays such as the one presented here.
Implementation of the FLIPS assay should first include running a positive control such as pNL4-3 plasmids rather than participant samples. This will allow for any troubleshooting prior to the use of HIV-1 positive cells, as the sequences obtained can be compared to available reference sequences for these plasmids. When using HIV-1 positive cells, it is important to consider the HIV-1 subtype (primers designed for FLIPS are specific to subtype B) and the infection frequency of the cell population if little to no proviruses are amplified. Primer sequences can be modified/redesigned to match other subtypes. Additionally, a well containing a positive control should be included in every PCR performed.
FLIPS has overcome the limitations of previous sequencing assays, including SPS. Through amplifying and sequencing near full-length HIV-1 proviruses, FLIPS can determine the potential replication-competency of HIV-1 proviruses. This was not possible using SPS, which sequenced only sub-genomic regions and therefore selected for sequences with intact primer binding sites. Furthermore, FLIPS overcomes the limitations associated with utilizing multiple amplification and sequencing primers, as was employed by previous full-length sequencing assays1,4. Through two rounds of PCR targeting the HIV-1 LTR regions combined with NGS, FLIPS decreases the number and complexity of primers required. FLIPS is therefore less susceptible to the consequences of primer mismatches, namely the erroneous identification of defective proviruses and an inability to amplify some proviruses within a population. The FLIPS protocol is also more efficient and allows for a higher throughput of sequencing than previous methods.
Evidently, FLIPS provides advantages over existing methods that determine the genetic composition of HIV-1 proviruses. However, it is important to acknowledge limitations of FLIPS. Firstly, the FLIPS assay has not been developed as a tool for measuring the size of the latent HIV-1 reservoir, as analyses to determine whether FLIPS amplifies every HIV-1 provirus present in a cell population have not been completed. FLIPS is instead useful for making relative comparisons of the composition of the reservoir between different cell populations2. Secondly, the replication-competency of intact HIV-1 proviruses cannot be determined with certainty without in vivo analyses, such as those performed by Ho et al.4. Thirdly, FLIPS is not designed to determine the integration site of HIV-1 proviruses.
Minor variations to the FLIPS protocol can increase its application. For example, changes in primer sequences can allow different and multiple HIV-1 subtypes to be amplified and sequenced. Sequencing of plasma HIV-1 virions is possible through the addition of cDNA synthesis prior to nested PCR. Future utilization of single molecule sequencing methods will eliminate the need for de novo assembly.
Genetic sequencing of integrated HIV-1 proviruses has increased our understanding of the latent HIV-1 reservoir. FLIPS is an important tool for future studies elucidating the composition and distribution of the latent reservoir. However, the application of FLIPS can extend beyond the reservoir. Future studies may utilize FLIPS to determine particular targets for CRISPR-Cas technology, or assist in the identification of coding and non-coding regions which make the virus more responsive to latency reversing agents. Viral recombination may be better understood by looking at the junction sites of large internal deletions.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported the Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) to Find a Cure (1U19AI096109 and 1UM1AI126611-01); an amfAR Research Consortium on HIV Eradication (ARCHE) Collaborative Research Grant from The Foundation for AIDS Research (amfAR 108074-50-RGRL); Australian Centre for HIV and Hepatitis Virology Research (ACH2); UCSF-GIVI Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI027763); and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (AAP1061681). We would like to thank Dr. Joey Lai, Genomics Facility Manager at The Westmead Institute for Medical Research for his training in library preparation and use of his facility, and the Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) for conducting sequencing. We acknowledge with gratitude the participants who donated samples for this study.
UltraPure 1 M Tris-HCI, pH 8.0 | Invitrogen | 15568025 | Dilute to 5 mM for nested PCR |
Nonidet P 40 Substitute solution | Sigma | 98379 | |
Tween-20 | Sigma | P9416 | |
Proteinase K Solution (20 mg/mL) | Promega | AM2548 | |
96 well thermocycler | Any 96 well thermocycler can be used | ||
Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity | Invitrogen | 11304011 | |
10X High Fidelity Buffer [600 mM Tris-SO4 (pH 8.9), 180 mM (NH4)2SO4] | Invitrogen | 11304011 | |
50 mM MgSO4 | Invitrogen | 11304011 | |
PCR Nucleotide Mix, 10 mM | Promega | C1141 | |
Ultrapure H2O | Invitrogen | 10977023 | |
PCR1 and PCR2 Primers | Desalted. Dilute to (100 M) with H2O | ||
PCR Plate 96 Well, Half Skirt, Single Notch Corner, Clear | Axygen | PCR-96M2-HS-C | |
Microseal 'B' Adhesive Seals | BioRad | MSB1001 | Required to seal 96 well PCR plates |
HIV-1 NL4-3 Infectious Molecular Clone (pNL4-3) | The following reagent was obtained through the NIH AIDS Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: HIV-1 NL4-3 Infectious Molecular Clone (pNL4-3) from Dr. Malcolm Martin (Cat# 114). | Diluted to 10^5 copies/mL and used as positive control | |
PCR plate spinner or benchtop centrifuge | |||
E-GEL 48 1% Agarose | Invitrogen | G800801 | Precast 1% agarose gels (two gels used per 96 well plate). Any 1% agarose gel can be substituted. Contains ethidium bromide. |
DirectLoad Wide Range DNA Marker | Sigma | D7058 | Any ladder with a range up to 10 kb can be substituted |
Mother E-Base device | Invitrogen | EBM03 | Required for running precast 48 well 1% agarose gels |
Gel Doc EZ Gel Documentation System | BioRad | 1708270 | Any visualisation system for ethidium bromide containing agarose gels can be used |
PlateMax Peelable Heat Sealing | Axygen | HS-200 | Heat sealing film for long term storage |
96 Well 0.8 mL Storage Plate | ThermoFisher Scientific | AB0765 | 0.8 mL 96 well plate required for magnetic bead based PCR purification |
Agencourt AMPure XP (PCR purification kit) | Beckman Coulter | A63880 | Magnetic bead based PCR purification kit. Other PCR purification kits can be substitued here (e.g. QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen Cat#28106) |
Ethyl alcohol, Pure. 200 proof, for molecular biology | Sigma | E7023 | |
Magnetic Stand-96 | Invitrogen | AM10027 | |
Microplate shaker | Optional | ||
Buffer EB | Qiagen | 19086 | Elution buffer |
Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit | Invitrogen | P11496 | A fluorescence based stain for measuring dsDNA concentration |
Microplate reader | |||
Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit | Illumina | FC-131-1096 | |
Nextera XT Index Kit | Illumina | FC-131-2001 | |
Hard-Shell 96-Well PCR Plates | Biorad | HSP9601 | Required for Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit |
Library Quantification Kit – Illumina/Universal | Kapa Biosystems | KK4824 | Other library quantification kits can be substitued (e.g. JetSeq DNA Library Quantification Lo-Rox Kit (Bioline Cat#BIO-68029) |
2100 Bioanalyzer | Agilent Technology | Automated electrophoresis system . Use in conjunction with a High Sensistivity DNA kit | |
High Sensistivty DNA kit | Agilent Technology | 5067-4626 | |
Illumina MiSeq Platform | Illumina |