This protocol presents a complete experimental workflow for studying RNA-protein interactions using optical tweezers. Several possible experimental setups are outlined including the combination of optical tweezers with confocal microscopy.
RNA adopts diverse structural folds, which are essential for its functions and thereby can impact diverse processes in the cell. In addition, the structure and function of an RNA can be modulated by various trans-acting factors, such as proteins, metabolites or other RNAs. Frameshifting RNA molecules, for instance, are regulatory RNAs located in coding regions, which direct translating ribosomes into an alternative open reading frame, and thereby act as gene switches. They may also adopt different folds after binding to proteins or other trans-factors. To dissect the role of RNA-binding proteins in translation and how they modulate RNA structure and stability, it is crucial to study the interplay and mechanical features of these RNA-protein complexes simultaneously. This work illustrates how to employ single-molecule-fluorescence-coupled optical tweezers to explore the conformational and thermodynamic landscape of RNA-protein complexes at a high resolution. As an example, the interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 programmed ribosomal frameshifting element with the trans-acting factor short isoform of zinc-finger antiviral protein is elaborated. In addition, fluorescence-labeled ribosomes were monitored using the confocal unit, which would ultimately enable the study of translation elongation. The fluorescence coupled OT assay can be widely applied to explore diverse RNA-protein complexes or trans-acting factors regulating translation and could facilitate studies of RNA-based gene regulation.
Transfer of genetic information from DNA to proteins through mRNAs is a complex biochemical process, which is precisely regulated on all levels through macromolecular interactions inside cells. For translational regulation, RNA-protein interactions confer a critical role to rapidly react to various stimuli and signals1,2. Some RNA-protein interactions affect mRNA stability and thereby alter the time an RNA is translationally active. Other RNA-protein interactions are associated with recoding mechanisms such as stop-codon readthrough, bypassing, or programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF)3,4,5,6,7. Recently, a number of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have been demonstrated to interact with stimulatory mRNA elements and the translation machinery to dictate when and how much recoding will occur in the cell7,8,9,10,11. Thus, to dissect the role of RNA-binding proteins in translation and how they modulate RNA structure and stability, it is pivotal to study the interaction principles and mechanical properties of these RNA-protein complexes in detail.
Decades of work have laid the foundation to study the multi-step and multi-component process of translation, which relies on intricate communication between the RNA and protein components of the translation machinery to achieve speed and accuracy12,13,14. A crucial next step in understanding complex regulatory events is determining the forces, timescales, and structural determinants during translation at high precision12,15,16,17. The study of RNA conformational dynamics and especially how trans-acting auxiliary factors act on the RNA structure during translation have been further illuminated by the emergence of single-molecule tools, including optical tweezers or zero-mode waveguides16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26.
Optical tweezers (OT) represent a highly precise single-molecule technique, which has been applied to study many sorts of RNA-dependent dynamic processes including transcription, and translation26,27,28,29,30,31,32. The use of optical tweezers has allowed probing of molecular interactions, nucleic acid structures, and thermodynamic properties, kinetics, and energetics of these processes in detail16,17,22,33,34,35,36,37,38,39. Optical tweezers assay is based on the entrapment of microscopic objects with a focused laser beam. In a typical OT experiment, the molecule of interest is tethered between two transparent (usually polystyrene) beads (Figure 1A)27. These beads are then caught by optical traps, which behave like springs. Thus, the force applied on the molecule can be calculated based on the bead's displacement from the center of the focused laser beam (trap center). Recently, optical tweezers have been combined with confocal microscopy (Figure 1B), enabling fluorescence or Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements40,41,42. This opens a whole new field of possible experiments allowing simultaneous measurement and, therefore, precise correlation of force spectroscopy and fluorescence data.
Here, we demonstrate experiments using the optical tweezers combined with confocal microscopy to study protein-RNA interactions regulating translational frameshifting. Between the objective and the condenser, a flow cell with five channels enables continuous sample application with laminar flow. Through the microfluidic channels, various components can be injected directly, which decreases the hands-on time as well as allowing very little sample consumption throughout the experiment.
First, a basic guideline to assist the design of OT experiments is proposed and advantages as well as pitfalls of various setups are discussed. Next, the preparation of samples and experimental workflows are described, and a protocol for the data analysis is provided. To represent an example, we outline the results obtained from RNA stretching experiments to study the SARS-CoV-2 frameshifting RNA element (Figure 2A) with the trans-acting factor the short isoform of zinc-finger antiviral protein (ZAP), which alters the translation of the viral RNA from an alternative reading frame43. Additionally, it is demonstrated that fluorescence-labeled ribosomes can be employed in this OT confocal assay, which would be useful to monitor the processivity and speed of the translation machinery. The method presented here can be used to rapidly test the effect of different buffers, ligands, or other cellular components to study various aspects of translation. Finally, common experimental pitfalls and how to troubleshoot them are discussed. Below, some crucial points in experimental design are outlined.
Construct design
In principle, there are two common approaches to create an OT-compatible RNA construct. The first approach employs a long RNA molecule that is hybridized with complementary DNA handles, thus yielding a construct consisting of two RNA/DNA hybrid regions flanking a single-stranded RNA sequence in the middle (Figure 2B). This approach is employed in most OT RNA experiments33,44,45.
The second approach takes advantage of dsDNA handles with short (around 20 nt) overhangs15,17. These overhangs are then hybridized with the RNA molecule. Although more complicated in design, the use of dsDNA handles overcomes some of limitations of the DNA/RNA-hybrid system. In principle, even very long handles (>10kb) can be implemented, which is more convenient for confocal measurements. In addition, the RNA molecule can be ligated to DNA handles to increase tether stability.
End-labeling strategy
The construct must be tethered to beads via a strong molecular interaction. While there are approaches available for covalent bonding of handles to beads46, strong but non-covalent interactions such as streptavidin-biotin and digoxigenin-antibody are commonly used in OT experiments15,33,35,45. In the described protocol, the construct is labeled with biotin or digoxigenin, and the beads are coated with streptavidin or antibodies against digoxigenin, respectively (Figure 1A). This approach would be suitable for applying forces up to approximately 60 pN (per tether)47. Furthermore, the use of different 5' and 3' labeling strategies allow determining the orientation of the tether formed between the beads17.
Protein labeling for fluorescence measurements
For the confocal imaging, there are several commonly used approaches for fluorescence labeling. For instance, fluorophores can be covalently attached to amino acid residues that are found natively in proteins or introduced by site-directed mutagenesis through a reactive organic group. Thiol or amine-reactive dyes can be used for labeling of cysteine and lysine residues, respectively. There are several reversible protection methods to increase the specificity of labeling48,49, however native proteins would typically be labeled at multiple residues. Although the small size of the fluorophore may confer an advantage, non-specific labeling might interfere with the protein activity and thus signal intensity may vary49. Also, depending on the labeling efficiency signal intensity may differ between different experiments. Therefore, an activity check should be performed prior to the experiment.
In case the protein of interest contains an N- or C-terminal tag, such as a His-tag or strep-tag, specific labeling of these tags represents another popular approach. Moreover, tag-targeted labeling reduces the chance of the fluorophore interfering with protein activity and can enhance solubility49. However, tag-specific labeling usually yields mono-fluorophore labeled proteins, which might be challenging to detect. Another way of specific labeling can be accomplished by employing antibodies.
Microfluidics setup
The combination of OT with a microfluidics system allows a rapid transition between different experimental conditions. Moreover, current systems take advantage of maintaining the laminar flow inside the flow cell, which precludes the mixing of liquids from other channels in the perpendicular direction relative to the flow direction. Therefore, laminar flow is particularly advantageous for the experimental design. Currently, flow cells with up to 5 channels are commonly employed (Figure 3).
1. Sample preparation
2. Instrument setup
NOTE: The following protocol is optimized for the commercial optical tweezers instrument C-Trap from LUMICKS company. Therefore, adjustments to the presented steps might be necessary while using other optical tweezers instruments. If not used, the microfluidics system of the machine is kept in bleach (sodium hypochlorite solution) and must be washed before use.
3. Sample measurement
4. Data analysis
In this section, focus is mainly given on measurements of RNA-protein/ligand interactions by the fluorescence optical tweezers. For a description of general RNA optical tweezers experiments and corresponding representative results, see32. For more detailed discussion of the RNA/DNA-protein interactions, also see1,2,26,59,60.
In principle, binding of an RBP or any other trans-acting factor of interest on the RNA stabilizes, destabilizes, or may alter the conformation of the molecule. Below, a depiction of the mechanical observables for each effect are shown. However, the actual effect observed for a given RNA-protein complex is not limited to these below-mentioned scenarios.
Stabilization
The RNA structure can be specifically recognized and bound by the protein or other ligands45,61,62,63,64. The formation of the bonds is accompanied by a release of energy. Therefore, an extra energetical barrier must be overcome in order to unfold the given RNA structure. As a result, an increase in the mean unfolding force might be observed50,65. The stabilization of the RNA structure by binding of an external agent (protein, small molecule, other trans-acting factors) may also result in a change of the folding kinetics of the structure45. For that, further measurements can be performed in the constant-force mode, where less frequent transitions between the folding intermediates as well as force-shift in the equilibrium can be observed.
Destabilization
Some proteins recognize certain sequence motifs rather than specific RNA structures. The binding sites may vary from a highly specific motif to a more general pattern such as GC or AU rich stretches60,66. Nevertheless, if the protein preferentially binds to the unfolded single-stranded RNA conformation, the equilibrium between the folded and unfolded state can be shifted towards the unfolded state36,43,67. In Figure 6 and Figure 7 examples of such behavior are depicted.
Structure alteration
In some instances, RBPs (or other ligands) might combine both mechanisms mentioned above in such a way that the RBP destabilizes the previously dominant conformation and shifts the equilibrium towards an alternative RNA structure44,68,69. The switch to an alternative state may result in a change in the observed conformational population frequencies as well as the occurrence or disappearance of individual folding states. These changes can be first observed in force-ramp experiments and can be further investigated by the constant-force (or constant-position) experiments.
Effect of the trans-acting factor on RNA folding/unfolding
Here, an RNA sequence corresponding to the -1 programmed ribosomal frameshifting element of SARS-CoV-2 was studied. This RNA element is predicted to form an H-type pseudoknot70,71. In the example force-distance trajectories, the RNA unfolds and refolds in two consecutive steps (Figure 6A). These two steps likely correspond to the two stem loops that are the prerequisite for the pseudoknot formation. In this case, the pseudoknot was not observed either because the RNA did not fully fold or formed an alternative structure competing with the pseudoknot. Upon addition of the trans-acting factor ZAP, a sudden disappearance of the refolding events and a huge hysteresis was observed (Figure 6B)43. This suggests that the protein binds to the single-stranded state of the RNA, impeding the formation of secondary structures. Furthermore, constant-force experiments confirm the results of force-ramp experiments. Accordingly, while the RNA is fully folded at around 10 pN (Figure 7A), the presence of the protein shifts the refolding towards lower forces, and at 10 pN the RNA is still mostly occupying the unfolded state (Figure 7B).
OT measurements coupled with confocal microscopy
Next, exemplary results are shown for the non-specific as well as specific binding of different fluorophores and labeled ribosomes (Figure 8). In the first example, SYTOX Green dye was used to label the tethered DNA/RNA hybrid. With increasing force, the dye binding is more abundant resulting in higher fluorescence signal. Once the force is too high, the tether breaks, and the fluorescence signal is lost (Figure 8A). For the experiments with bacterial ribosomes (Figure 8B), non-specific labeling of the lysine residues was employed using N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) conjugated to a red fluorescent dye. Although there is a risk of decreasing the activity of labeled protein/complex, the big advantage is stronger signal achieved as each ribosome is (on average) labeled by multiple fluorophores. The RNA construct contained a ribosome binding site (RBS) recognized by bacterial ribosomes, which was placed in the 5' proximity of the studied RNA sequence. Upon binding of the ribosomes, the fluorescence signal is observed on the tether. Fluorescence data can be further analyzed using image analysis tools72, and the results can be combined with the force data, allowing the study of folding transitions.
Figure 1: Schematic of the OT experiment and possible measurement approaches. (A) Schematic illustrating the optical tweezers experiments with the SARS-CoV-2 frameshifting RNA in the middle. RNA is hybridized to ssDNA handles and immobilized on beads. These are used to exert pulling force on the RNA with a focused laser beam. The force is gradually increased until the RNA is unfolded (bottom). (B) Schematic of confocal microscopy combined with optical tweezers to monitor binding of labeled factor to RNA. (C) Example constant-force data can be obtained by fixing the force at a constant value over time, which allows to precisely measure dwell time of the conformers. (D) Example force-distance (FD) curve obtained from a force-ramp measurement. The unfolding step is observed as a sudden rupture in the FD profile. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: A general scheme of OT sample synthesis. (A) Example sequence and predicted secondary structure of the studied SARS-CoV-2 frameshifting RNA employed in the study. (B) A vector containing the sequence of interest (SoI) flanked by two handle regions serves as the template for generation of the DNA/RNA construct in 3 PCR reactions. Primers are depicted and numbered in the scheme according to their binding sites in the corresponding PCR. PCR 1 yields the in vitro transcription template, which is subsequently used for the in vitro transcription (IVT) reaction to generate the long RNA molecule (light blue). PCR 2 yields the 5' handle, which is later 3' labeled with biotin. PCR 3 using the forward primer conjugated to digoxigenin produces the 3' digoxigenin-labeled handle. Finally, the two handles and RNA are annealed to give a DNA/RNA hybrid construct suitable for optical tweezers measurements. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Illustration of different microfluidics channel setups. (A) A scheme of the flow cell with 5- microfluidics channels. (B) and (C) are the zoom-ins of the red-dashed area of (A). (B) A simple 3- channel setup with AD beads and SA beads in channels 1 and 3, respectively. Factor is found in channel 2. This setup is suitable for stable proteins with high affinity, thus low concentration is preferred to ensure low fluorescent background. The bead channels on the side allow fixed tether orientation and quick recruitment of new beads if necessary. (C) 4-channel setup with Factor in channel 4. Such an arrangement is particularly advantageous for minimal sample consumption. The measurement can be performed directly in channel 4. Alternatively, to avoid background fluorescence signal, the complex can be formed in channel 4 and then the measurement can be performed in channel 3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Data analysis workflow for force-ramp experiments. (A) Flowchart of the data analysis workflow. The raw data files are first downsampled and filtered, then steps are marked and the individual states are fitted to the corresponding model. (B) The raw data contain considerable amount of noise, which obstruct the identification of unfolding/refolding events. Also, in most of the experiments, the frequency of data gathering is higher than necessary. (C) Therefore, downsampling and signal filtration are employed to smoothen the data profile. (D) The processed curves are finally fitted using the WLC model when the molecule is still in the folded state (before the unfolding event), a combination of the WLC with FJC models or a second WLC model when the molecule is in an unfolded state (after the unfolding event). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: The effect of cut-off-frequency on data output. While the raw data output might be burdened with signal noise (top), it is crucial to choose proper signal filtration parameters for data analysis. Although proper filtration would help in the identification of folding intermediates (cut-off frequency 0.1, middle), over filtration (cut-off frequency <0.001, bottom) may result in loss of resolution. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Example FD trajectories in the absence and presence of ZAP. (A) Unfolding (pink) and refolding (blue) traces of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the absence of ZAP. The sample shows readily refolding with only small hysteresis. (B) Unfolding (pink) and refolding (blue) traces of the RNA in the presence of trans-factor ZAP (400 nM). The sample shows huge hysteresis, suggesting that the protein binds to the single-stranded RNA and prevents its refolding. (C) A bar chart showing the number of unfolding (pink) and refolding (blue) steps in the absence or presence of ZAP. While the distribution of unfolding steps remains almost unaffected by the presence of ZAP, there is a clear drop in the number of refolding steps with ZAP. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Example constant-force data in the absence and presence of ZAP. (A) Constant-force data obtained at forces ranging between 10 (up) to 13 (bottom) pN showing the shift from fully folded state to fully unfolded state of the SARS-CoV-2 frameshifting RNA element. Each graph includes the position vs. time (left) and a histogram plot (right). (B) Constant-force data obtained in the presence of ZAP (400 nM). Upon protein binding, the refolding is impaired. At 10 pN, in contrast to RNA alone, in the presence of ZAP RNA mostly exists in the unfolded state. Therefore, a shift in the equilibrium force towards lower forces is indicated. (C) The histogram of position data can be analyzed by fitting the data to Gaussian functions to yield the relative abundance of each state (derived from the area under the curve for each state). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: OT combined with confocal microscopy. (A) An example kymograph of the SYTOX Green labeled tether (left). Note the increase in signal intensity at increasing forces. The black arrow marks the tether breakage event, which leads to loss of signal. Depiction of the tether with dye bound to it (Binding) and after breakage without dye (No signal) (right). (B) Example kymograph of specific binding of the ribosome on the mRNA (left). The binding event can be observed as a fluorescence signal on the tethered RNA between the two beads. Depiction of tether without (No signal) and with fluorescence-labeled ribosomes bound (Binding) (right). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Stock concentration | Final concentration | Volume | |
Reaction volume | – | – | 500 µL |
10× buffer | 10× | 1× | 50 µL |
dNTP mix | 10 mM | 0.2 mM | 10 µL |
High fidelity DNA polymerase | 1.25 U/µL | 0.025 U/µL | 10 µL |
Primer 1 | 10 µM | 0.4 µM | 20 µL |
Primer 2 | 10 µM | 0.4 µM | 20 µL |
Template | 100 ng/µL | 1 ng/µL | 5 µL |
Water | – | – | 385 µL |
Table 1: Pipetting scheme for the PCR to generate the optical tweezers constructs.
Stock concentration | Final concentration | Volume | |
Reaction volume | – | – | 300 µL |
5× buffer | 5× | 1× | 60 µL |
rNTP mix | 25 mM | 5 mM | 60 µL |
RNase inhibitor | 40 U/µL | 0.7 U/µL | 5 µL |
Pyrophosphatase | 100 U/mL | 1.7 mU/µL | 4 µL |
DTT | 100 mM | 3.3 mM | 10 µL |
T7 RNA polymerase | 50 U/µL | 3.3 U/µL | 20 µL |
Template | 120 ng/µL | 2 ng/µL | 5 µL |
Water | – | – | 136 µL |
Table 2: Pipetting scheme for in vitro transcription.
Stock concentration | Final concentration | Volume | |
Reaction volume | – | – | 100 µL |
10× buffer (NEB 2.1) | 10× | 1× | 10 µL |
BSA | 1 µg/ml | 100 ng/µL | 1 µL |
Biotin-16-dUTP | 1 mM | 50 µM | 5 µL |
T4 DNA polymerase | 30 U/µL | 1.5 U/µL | 5 µL |
DNA 5’ handle (20-60 µg) | 300 ng/µL | 237 ng/µL | 79 µL |
Table 3: Pipetting scheme for 3' end biotin labeling.
Stock concentration | Final concentration | Final amount | Volume | |
Reaction volume | – | – | – | 300 µL |
Annealing buffer | 1.25× | 1× | – | 240 µL |
RNase inhibitors | 40 U/µL | 0.5 U/µL | – | 5 µL |
5' biotinylated DNA handle | 300 ng/µL | 10 ng/µL | 3 µg | 10 µL |
3' DNA handle | 300 ng/µL | 10 ng/µL | 3 µg | 10 µL |
RNA | 150 ng/µL | 10 ng/µL | 3 µg | 20 µL |
Water | – | – | – | 5 µL |
Table 4: Pipetting scheme for the annealing of the optical tweezers construct.
Here, we demonstrate the use of fluorescence-coupled optical tweezers to study interactions and dynamic behavior of RNA molecules with various ligands. Below, critical steps and limitations of the present technique are discussed.
Critical steps in the protocol
As for many other methods, the quality of the sample is pivotal to obtain reliable data. Therefore, to obtain the highest possible quality samples, it is worth it to spend time to optimize the procedure for sample preparation. The optimization steps include proper primer design, annealing temperatures, RNA and protein purification steps.
Throughout the experiment use of filtered tips and solutions is crucial in order to maintain RNase-free conditions. In addition, the microfluidics system is kept in bleach when not in use. Before starting measurements, it is important to wash the system properly with sodium thiosulfate and RNase-free water to remove the bleach from the system.
In case the same-sized beads are used throughout the experiment, it is not required to perform force calibration each time. Nevertheless, force calibration checks should be done regularly for the reproducibility of experiments.
Modifications and troubleshooting of the method
Fluorophore stability and photobleaching
A complication during fluorescence measurements is photobleaching. Since the time frame to monitor translation can be extended from seconds to minutes depending on the system, photobleaching during the measurements should be also considered and minimized as much as possible73. One option is to employ more stable fluorophores, which are less prone to photobleaching, such as recently introduced quantum dots49,74,75. Further stability is also achieved by removing oxygen molecules using an "oxygen scavenger" system, such as glucose oxidase coupled with catalase. Glucose oxidase removes oxygen from the environment by turning it into hydrogen peroxide, which is then decomposed by catalase. Alternative oxygen scavenging systems can also be employed76,77.
Mikroakışkanlar
Maintaining a continuous laminar flow is essential for proper measurements. Most importantly, the system should never run dry. Unfortunately, RBPs or other trans-acting factors of interest are often available only in small volumes for the experiments, therefore maintaining continuous flow can be challenging and cost intensive. If air bubbles are introduced into the system during the sample application, manual pressure or ethanol wash is usually sufficient for their removal.
Limitations of the method
Combination of OT with confocal microscopy also brings some limitations. First, the focal plane of the confocal unit must be aligned properly with trap centers to allow proper recording of fluorescence signal. Furthermore, for confocal measurements, handles of at least 2 kb at each site are usually needed17. Although in principle using longer handles is possible, one should consider the energy contribution of the handles and the change in the persistence length for the accuracy of data analysis78. Another crucial point is the oxygen scavengers, which are used to increase the half-life of the fluorophores, also lead to relatively quick changes in pH of the solutions76. These changes can be partially compensated by increasing the concentration of the buffering compound; however, during the measurements, samples should be replenished regularly (every 30-60 min) to ensure consistent conditions through the experiment.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Anuja Kibe and Jun. Prof. Redmond Smyth for critically reviewing the manuscript. We thank Tatyana Koch for expert technical assistance. We thank Kristyna Pekarkova for the help with recording experimental videos. The work in our laboratory is supported by the Helmholtz Association and funding from the European Research Council (ERC) Grant Nr. 948636 (to NC).
Bacterial Strains | |||
E. coli HB101 | lab collection | N/A | cloning of the vectors |
Chemicals and enzymes | |||
Sodium chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | 31424 | Buffers |
Biotin-16-dUTP | Roche | 11093070910 | Biotinylation |
BSA | Sigma-Aldrich | A4737 | Buffers |
Catalase | Lumicks | N/A | Oxygen scavanger system |
Dithiothreitol (DTT) | Melford Labs | D11000 | Buffers |
DNAse I from bovine pancreas | Sigma-Aldrich | D4527 | in vitro transcription |
dNTPs | Th.Geyer | 11786181 | PCR |
EDTA | Sigma-Aldrich | E9884 | Buffers |
Formamide | Sigma-Aldrich | 11814320001 | Buffers |
Glucose | Sigma-Aldrich | G8270-1KG | Oxygen scavanger system |
Glucose-oxidase | Lumicks | N/A | Oxygen scavanger system |
HEPES | Carl Roth | HN78.3 | Buffers |
Magnesium chloride | Carl Roth | 2189.1 | Buffers |
Phusion DNA polymerase | NEB | M0530L | Gibson assembly, cloning |
Potassium chloride | Merck | 529552-1KG | Buffers |
PrimeSTAR GXL DNA Polymerase | Takara Bio Clontech | R050A | PCR |
Pyrophosphotase, thermostabile, inorganic | NEB | M0296L | in vitro transcription |
RNase Inhibitor | Molox | 1000379515 | Buffers |
rNTPS | life technologies | R0481 | in vitro transcription |
Sodium thiosulophate | Sigma-Aldrich | S6672-500G | Bleach deactivation |
Sytox Green | Lumicks | N/A | confocal measurements |
T4 DNA Polymerase | NEB | M0203S | Biotinylation |
T5 exonuclease | NEB | M0363S | Gibson assembly, cloning |
T7 RNA polymerase | Produced in-house | N/A | in vitro transcription |
Taq DNA polymerase | NEB | M0267S | PCR |
Taq ligase | Biozym | L6060L | Gibson assembly, cloning |
TWEEN 20 BioXtra | Sigma-Aldrich | P7949 | Buffers |
Kits | |||
Monolith Protein Labeling Kit RED-NHS 2nd Generation (Amine Reactive) | Nanotemper | MO-L011 | Used for ribosome labeling |
Purefrex 2.0 | GeneFrontier | PF201-0.25-EX | Ribosomes used for the labeling |
Oligonucleotides | |||
5' handle T7 forward | Microsynth | custom order | 5’ – CTTAATACGACTCACTATAGGTC CTTTCTGTGGACGCC – 3’, used to generate OT in vitro transcription template in PCR 1 |
3’ handle reverse | Microsynth | custom order | 5' - GTCAAAGTGCGCCCCGTTATCC – 3', used to generate OT in vitro transcription template in PCR 1 |
5' handle forward | Microsynth | custom order | 5' – TCCTTTCTGTGGACGCCGC – 3' , used to generate 5' handle in PCR 2 |
5’ handle reverse | Microsynth | custom order | 5’ – CATAAATACCTCTTTACTAATATA TATACCTTCGTAAGCTAGCGT – 3’, used to generate 5' handle in PCR 2 |
3’ handle forward | Microsynth | custom order | 5' – ATCCTGCAACCTGCTCTTCGCC AG – 3', used to generate 3' handle in PCR 3 |
3’ handle reverse 5’labeled with digoxigenin | Microsynth | custom order | 5' -[Dig]-GTCAAAGTGCGCCCCGTTATCC – 3', used to generate 3' handle in PCR 3 |
DNA vectors | |||
pMZ_OT | produced in-house | N/A | further description in "Structural studies of Cardiovirus 2A protein reveal the molecular basis for RNA recognition and translational control" Chris H. Hill, Sawsan Napthine, Lukas Pekarek, Anuja Kibe, Andrew E. Firth, Stephen C. Graham, Neva Caliskan, Ian Brierley bioRxiv 2020.08.11.245035; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.245035 |
Software and Algorithms | |||
Atom | https://atom.io/packages/ide-python | N/A | |
Bluelake | Lumicks | N/A | |
Graphpad | https://www.graphpad.com/ | N/A | |
InkScape 0.92.3 | https://inkscape.org/ | N/A | |
Matlab | https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html | N/A | |
POTATO | https://github.com/lpekarek/POTATO.git | N/A | |
RNAstructure | https://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructure.html | N/A | |
Spyder | https://www.spyder-ide.org/ | N/A | |
Diğer | |||
Streptavidin Coated Polystyrene Particles, 1.5-1.9 µm, 5 ml, 1.0% w/v | Spherotech | SVP-15-5 | |
Anti-digoxigenin Coated Polystyrene Particles, 2.0-2.4 µm, 2 ml, 0.1% w/v | Spherotech | DIGP-20-2 | |
Syringes | VWR | TERUMO SS+03L1 | |
Devices | |||
C-trap | Lumicks | N/A | optical tweezers coupled with confocal microscopy |