A Suppressor Screen for the Characterization of Genetic Links Regulating Chronological Lifespan in <em>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</em>

Christie Dix; Susan Sgro; Anup Patel; Carly Perrotta; Noor Eldabagh; Katherine  L. Lomauro; Fredy  W. Miguez; Prianka Chohan; Charmi Jariwala; James T. Arnone

doi:10.3791/61506

JoVE Journal > Genetics

Genetik

A Suppressor Screen for the Characterization of Genetic Links Regulating Chronological Lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published: September 17, 2020

doi:

10.3791/61506

Christie Dix¹, Susan Sgro¹, Anup Patel¹, Carly Perrotta¹, Noor Eldabagh¹, Katherine L. Lomauro¹, Fredy W. Miguez¹, Prianka Chohan¹, Charmi Jariwala¹, James T. Arnone¹

¹Biyoloji Bölümü,William Paterson University

Özet

Here is a protocol to identify genetic interactions through an increased copy number suppressor screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This method allows researchers to identify, clone, and test suppressors in short-lived yeast mutants. We test the effect of the copy number increase of SIR2 on lifespan in an autophagy null mutant.

Abstract

Aging is the time dependent deterioration of an organism’s normal biological processes that increases the probability of death. Many genetic factors contribute to alterations in the normal aging process. These factors intersect in complex ways, as evidenced by the wealth of documented links identified and conserved in many organisms. Most of these studies focus on loss-of-function, null mutants that allow for rapid screening of many genes simultaneously. There is much less work that focuses on characterizing the role that overexpression of a gene in this process. In the present work, we present a straightforward methodology to identify and clone genes in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for study in suppression of the short-lived chronological lifespan phenotype seen in many genetic backgrounds. This protocol is designed to be accessible to researchers from a wide variety of backgrounds and at various academic stages. The SIR2 gene, which codes for a histone deacetylase, was selected for cloning in the pRS315 vector, as there have been conflicting reports on its effect on the chronological lifespan. SIR2 also plays a role in autophagy, which results when disrupted via the deletion of several genes, including the transcription factor ATG1. As a proof of principle, we clone the SIR2 gene to perform a suppressor screen on the shortened lifespan phenotype characteristic of the autophagy deficient atg1Δ mutant and compare it to an otherwise isogenic, wild type genetic background.

Introduction

Aging is the time-dependent loss of integrity in myriad biological processes that ultimately increases the probability of organismal death. Aging is nearly inevitable for all species. On a cellular level there are several well characterized hallmarks that are associated with aging, including: genomic instability, epigenetic alterations, loss-of-proteostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, deregulated nutrient sensing, cellular senescence, and telomere attrition¹^,². In single celled organisms, such as yeasts, this leads to a reduction in replicative potential and chronological life span³^,⁴. These cellular changes manifest in more complex organisms, like humans, as pathologies that include cancers, heart failure, neurodegeneration, diabetes, and osteoporosis⁵^,⁶^,⁷. Despite the many complexities that characterize the process of aging, there is conservation of these molecular hallmarks underlying this process across widely divergent organisms⁸^,⁹^,¹⁰. Identification of alterations to these pathways during aging led to the realization that they can be manipulated via lifestyle changes – dietary restriction is shown to substantially extend lifespan in many organisms¹¹. These pathways converge and intersect with each other and many other pathways, in complex ways. Elucidation and characterization of these interactions offers potential for therapeutic interventions to prolong lifespan and healthspan¹²^,¹³^,¹⁴.

The conservation of the molecular underpinnings of aging allows for functional dissection of genetic interactions underlying the process through the use of simpler model organisms – including in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae¹⁵^,¹⁶. There are two established types of aging modeled by budding yeast: chronological aging (the chronological lifespan, CLS) and replicative aging (the replicative lifespan, RLS)¹⁷. Chronological aging measures the amount of time that a cell can survive in a non-dividing state. This is analogous to the aging that is seen in cells that spend the majority of their life in G₀, such as neurons⁴. Alternatively, replicative lifespan is the number of times that a cell can divide before exhaustion and is a model for mitotically active cell types (e.g., the number of daughter cells that a cell can have)¹⁸.

The overall goal of this method is to present a protocol that allows for the functional dissection of the genetics of aging using S. cerevisiae. While there have been many excellent studies performed by many researchers that have led to our current understanding, there remain many opportunities available for budding researchers to contribute to the aging field from early in their academic career. We present a clear methodology that will allow researchers to further advance the field of aging. This protocol is designed to be accessible for all researchers regardless of the stage in their academic career by providing the tools necessary to formulate and test their own novel hypotheses. The advantage of our approach is that this is a cost effective method readily accessible to all researchers regardless of institution – and does not require expensive, specialized equipment necessary for some protocols¹⁹. There are several different ways to design this type of screen, the approach outlined in this work is particularly amenable to screening null mutants of non-essential genes that exhibit a severe reduction in the chronological lifespan compared to an isogenic wild-type strain of yeast.

As our proof of principle, we clone SIR2, a lysine deacetylase reported as exhibiting both an extended and a shortened CLS when overexpressed. SIR2 overexpression was recently found to increase CLS in winemaking yeasts; however, several groups have reported no link between SIR2 and CLS extension, leaving its role under characterized²⁰^,²¹^,²². Due to these conflicting reports in the literature, we selected this gene to add independent research to help clarify the role of SIR2 in chronological aging, if any. Additionally, increasing the copy number of a SIR2 homologue extends lifespan in a nematode worm model system²³.

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation system to deliver cytosolic products, such as proteins and organelles, to the lysosome²⁴. Autophagy is intimately linked to longevity through its role in degrading damaged proteins and organelles to maintain cellular homeostasis²⁵. Induction of autophagy depends on orchestrating the expression of many genes, and the deletion of the ATG1 gene results in an abnormally short CLS in budding yeast²⁶. ATG1 codes for a protein serine/threonine kinase that is required for vesicle formation in autophagy and the cytoplasm-to-vacuole (the fungal lysosomal equivalent) pathway²⁷^,²⁸. Here, we present our method for an increased copy number screen, testing the effect of increased SIR2 copy on the CLS in a wild type and an atg1-null background. This method is particularly amenable to junior researchers and research groups at primarily undergraduate institutions, many of which serve communities underrepresented in the sciences and have limited resources.

Protocol

1. Identify potential genetic interactions for screening

Identify the genetic background(s) for characterization, that results in an abnormally shorted chronological life span (CLS) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using the Saccharomyces Genome Database (the SGD, https://www.yeastgenome.org²⁹^,³⁰), which compiles known phenotypic information for this organism.
1. Select the Function tab from the options on the top of the webpage.
2. Select Phenotype followed by selecting Browse all Phenotypes.
3. From the Yeast Phenotype Ontology options scroll to the Development subheading and select Chronological Lifespan, found under the Lifespan subheading.
4. Select the qualifier for decreased, which allows for the identification of genes that exhibit a phenotype that results in a decreased chronological lifespan phenotype when deleted. For this proof-of-method atg1Δ was selected, which results in a short-lived CLS phenotype and is disrupted for autophagy²⁶.
Identify target gene(s) to screen for genetic interactions that may suppress the phenotype, based on reported or predicted ontology attributes, of the mutant identified in part 1.2. Repeat the phenotype search as found in steps 1.1.1-1.1.4 above, querying for genes that result in a longer CLS when overexpressed in a wild-type background. SIR2 was selected based on the reported CLS phenotype and reported interactions with autophagy³¹^,³².

2. Prepare reagents

NOTE: Unless otherwise specified autoclave each solution at 121 ˚C for 20 min to sterilize prior to use.

YPAD liquid media: Add 1% Yeast Extract, 2% Peptone, 2% Dextrose (glucose), and 40 mg adenine (as adenine sulfate dehydrate) per liter of double distilled water. Mix well with a magnetic stirrer.
LB liquid media: Add Tryptone (10 g), Yeast extract (5 g), and Sodium Chloride (10 g) per liter of double distilled water. Mix well with a magnetic stirrer.
Prepare 1000x (100 mg/mL) ampicillin stock, in double distilled water. Mix well and filter sterilize.
Synthetic complete – Leucine (SC-LEU) liquid media: Add 1.7 g of Yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids, 2% Glucose, 1.92 g of SC-LEU Dropout mix, 5 g of Ammonium sulfate per liter of double distilled water. Mix well with a magnetic stirrer.
TE buffer: Mix Tris (10 mM final concentration), EDTA (1 mM final concentration) in the solution with double distilled water. Mix well with a magnetic stirrer.
Prepare 50% PEG 3350 in solution with double distilled water. Mix well with a magnetic stirrer.
Prepare 1 M and 100 mM Lithium Acetate solution with double distilled water. Mix well with a magnetic stirrer.
NOTE: To make solid agar plates add 20 g of agar (per liter with double distilled water) to the media prepared in 2.1 and 2.2 above prior to autoclaving. If preparing ampicillin plates add 1mL of the ampicillin to the media in 2.2 above after it has cooled to roughly 60 ˚C. Pour into sterile plates and allow to set for 48–72 h prior to use. Store plates at 4 ˚C for longer storage.

3. Design the cloning strategy to clone SIR2 into the pRS315 vector

Design PCR primers to amplify the SIR2 gene for cloning into the pRS315 vector.
1. Design primers manually to have 21–22 nucleotide complementarity to the intergenic regions upstream and downstream of the SIR2. Ensure that the entire gene, along with the untranslated regions of the mRNA is cloned by mapping those features from the available datasets³³^,³⁴.
2. Ensure that the PCR primer design results in forward and reverse primers that have a melting temperature (Tm) above 53 °C and below 60 °C.
  NOTE: Ideally, both primers should have a Tm as close to each other as sequence will allow, with an approximate GC content of between 40–50%, making sure to avoid dinucleotide repeats and balancing GC and AT distribution throughout the sequence.
3. After the design of the PCR primers that will allow for the generation of the amplicon for cloning, add restriction enzyme digestion (R.E.D.) target sites to the 5’ end of each primer that are compatible to the plasmid-cloning vector. In this method, a HindIII restriction enzyme digestion site (5’-AAGCTT-3’) is added to the upstream, forward primer and a SacII restriction enzyme digestion site (5’-CCGCGG-3’) is added to the downstream, reverse primer.
  NOTE: The use of the SacII and HindIII sites requires that the consensus cut site for each endonuclease is not present in the target gene. If either enzyme targets within the target gene, alternative restriction enzymes should be chosen. There are many that are compatible with the polylinker region on the pRS315 vector.
4. Lastly, add a four nucleotide (5’-NNNN-3’) sequence overhang to the 5’ end of each primer to allow the restriction enzyme to bind and digest the amplicon. Once the primers have been designed, have the oligonucleotides commercially synthesized for use cloning the SIR2 gene.
5. Resuspension of the PCR primers: Centrifuge the PCR primers using a tabletop microfuge at maximum speed for 4 min. Add TE solution to make a stock concentration of 100 µM. Store the stock concentration at -20 °C and dilute 1/10 for use in PCR applications.
  NOTE: To make a 100 μM stock, dissolve the primers in a volume of sterile TE buffer that is 10x the amount of nmoles in the primer tube, using microliters of TE. For example, if the tube contains 15.6 nmoles of primer, add 156 μL of TE buffer.
Isolate wild-type yeast gDNA for PCR amplification of the SIR2 cloning construct.
NOTE: Several high-quality options are commercially available for isolating yeast gDNA. Utilization of a kit that includes the digestion of the fungal cell wall with zymolyase results in better quality gDNA (higher yield, less impurities). The protocol below consistently returns high concentration and purity. Details of a kit we recommend can be found in the Table of Materials.
1. Grow 5 mL culture of wild-type yeast for 48-72 h to post-log phase in enriched media, such as YPAD. Pellet the yeast cells at >800 x g for 3 min at room temperature, remove the growth media, and resuspend in 120 μL of zymolyase digestion buffer supplemented with 5 μL of zymolyase (2 units enzyme/μL). Mix the sample by vortexing and incubate at 37 °C for 40 min.
2. Add 120 μL of a chaotropic lysis buffer (e.g., guanidinium chloride), 250 μL of chloroform, and vortex the sample for 60 s.
3. Centrifuge at >8,000 x g for 2 min and transfer the supernatant into a purification column in a sterile collection tube.
4. Centrifuge at >8,000 x g for 60 s and discard the flow through. The gDNA will be bound to the column matrix.
5. Wash the column twice with 300 μL of an ethanol-based wash buffer, repeating the centrifugation step from above (3.2.4). Discard the flow through after each spin. Transfer the column into a 1.5 mL microfuge tube, add 60 μL of TE buffer, and incubate at room temperature for 60 s. Flash spin the sample for 30 s to elute the DNA.
  NOTE: Determine the concentration of the DNA in the sample (Absorbance at 260nm) and the quality (Absorbance 260nm/280nm). A typical yield will be 100–200 ng/ μL of gDNA with absorbance ratio at 260nm/280nm as close to 1.8 as possible.
Amplify and isolate the pRS315 plasmid vector for cloning.
NOTE: Several high-quality options are commercially available for the purification of plasmid vectors. A silica-based column chemistry is recommended for this step. The changes noted below have led to the highest concentration and purity. Details are found in the Table of Materials.
1. Grow a 5 mL of culture of E. coli containing the pRS315 vector overnight in LB+ ampicillin (80 μg/mL) media. Pellet the culture by centrifugation at >8,000 x g for 2 min at RT (15–25 °C).
2. Re-suspend pelleted bacterial cells in 250 μL of TE buffer with RNase A (100 μg/mL) and transfer to a microcentrifuge tube. Ensure that no clumps of cells remain.
3. Add 250 μL of lysis buffer and mix by inverting the tube 6–8 times. Incubate for 5 min at room temperature. Do not allow lysis to proceed for more than 5 min – a little less is preferable.
4. Add 350 μL of neutralization buffer and mix immediately and thoroughly by inverting the tube 10 times. Centrifuge for 10 min at >8,000 x g.
5. Carefully transfer the supernatant from above to a silica spin column by pipetting. Centrifuge for 30 s and discard the flow-through.
6. Add 500 μL of a high salt wash buffer and centrifuge as in step 3.3.5. Discard the flow-through. Wash the DNA binding spin column by adding 750 μL of an ethanol-based wash buffer, to remove residual salts, and centrifuge as in step 3.3.5.
7. Discard the flow through and centrifuge for an additional 2 min at >8,000 x g to remove residual wash buffer. Place the spin column in a clean, labeled 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. To elute DNA, add 20 μL of TE buffer to the center of the spin column, incubate for 1 min at room temperature, and centrifuge for 1 min at >8,000 x g.
8. Use a spectrophotometer to determine the quantity (Absorbance at 260nm) and the quality (Absorbance 260 nm/280 nm) of DNA. A typical yield will be 1–2 μg/µL.
PCR amplification of the candidate gene, SIR2, from wild-type genomic DNA
1. To produce an amplicon that is suitable for cloning, utilize a high-fidelity (HF) PCR polymerase to avoid the unintentional generation of mutations into the sequence being amplified.
  NOTE: Many different high-fidelity PCR options are commercially available. To facilitate the optimization of the PCR reaction conditions, use two-buffer combination: one that is a standard HF buffer and one optimized for high GC and complex amplicons. Details can be found in the Table of Materials.
2. PCR amplify the SIR2 construct for cloning as described in Table 1.
  NOTE: To maximize success in the cloning steps, multiple identical 50 μL can be set up and concentrated by a PCR column clean up step. Be sure to set up one no gDNA template control reaction (negative control).
3. Set up the PCR cycling conditions as described in Table 2.
  NOTE: Different primer pairs vary on their annealing temperature and different polymerases function at different speeds. Make sure to optimize the amplification conditions based upon the enzyme selected and the specifications of the primer combination as designed.
4. Verify the success of the PCR reaction by visualizing the PCR reaction, which would produce an approximately 2.5 kb of DNA fragment, on a 1.0% TAE-agarose gel (with 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide for visualization).
Digestion and ligation of the candidate gene, SIR2, into the pRS315 plasmid vector.
1. Perform restriction digestion of the vector and the insert: 625 ng DNA (either the vector or insert), q.s. water to bring the final reaction volume to 50 μL, 5 μL of buffer, 1 μL SacII, and 1 μL HindIII. Incubate the restriction digestions at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by 80 °C for 20 min to heat inactivate the enzymes. Digests can be stored at 4 °C prior to proceeding to the next step.
2. Set up a 15 μL ligation reaction to create the desired plasmid: 6 μL of sterile water, 2 μL digested vector (50 ng DNA), 4 μL digested insert (100 ng DNA), 2 μL T4 reaction buffer, and 1 μL of T4 DNA Ligase. Incubate the ligation reactions overnight at 16 °C, followed by 80 °C for 20 min to heat inactivate the enzyme.
  NOTE: Set up a no insert control, substituting an additional 4 μL of sterile water (10 μL total) in lieu of the insert.
3. Transform the ligation reactions into E. coli.
  NOTE: There are many options available for competent cells that are available. This protocol uses chemically competent cells that are stored at -80 °C prior to use.
  1. Thaw a 50 μL tube of frozen, competent E. coli cells on ice until just thawed and immediately add 15 μL of the ligation reaction. Flick the tube several times. Immediately return the tubes to ice and incubate for 30 min.
  2. Heat-shock the cells for 20 s in a water bath at exactly 42 °C, and immediately return the tubes to ice for a 2 min incubation. Add 450 μL of room temperature recovery media (e.g., SOC or LB) to each transformation reaction and incubate for 60 min at 37 °C with shaking.
  3. For each transformation reaction, make a 1:10 dilution of cells. Using sterile technique, plate 150 µL of the undiluted cells and the 1:10 dilutions onto LB + (80 μg/mL) ampicillin plates³⁵. Incubate the plates at 37 °C overnight.
Screen prospective transformants for the overexpression vector.
1. Using sterile technique, inoculate the potential transformants that grew into 5 mL LB + (80 μg/mL) ampicillin and grow overnight. Following the procedure outlined in section 3.3.1–3.3.7 above, isolate the plasmids from every potential transformant and screen for successful integration of the insert by restriction digestion followed by gel electrophoresis on a 1.0% TAE-agarose gel (with 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide for visualization).

4. Transform the vector into atg1Δ and wild type yeast strains

NOTE: This is performed using a modified lithium acetate transformation protocol³⁶.

Pellet 15 mL of wild type and atg1-null yeast cells grown overnight in YPAD media to early to mid-log phase (O.D. 600nm = 0.4-0.9) of growth for 3 min at > 800 x g at room temperature.
Decant the supernatant, re-suspend the cell pellet in 1 mL of sterile ddH₂O and transfer the contents to a 1.7 mL microfuge tube. Pellet the cells for 3 min at > 800 x g at room temperature.
Remove the supernatant and re-suspend the cells in 250 μL of 100 mM lithium acetate with gentle pipetting. Split the cells into separate microfuge tubes for each of the transformations that you will perform. Use 50 μL of the cell-lithium acetate mix per transformation.
Set up a transformation mix. To each of the transformations add: 240 μL of 50% PEG3350, 36 μL of 1.0 M Lithium acetate, and 5 μL of Salmon sperm (or other carrier) DNA, boiled for 5 min and on ice.
NOTE: PEG is very viscous. Pipette and measure carefully. Mix by pipetting after the addition of each component prior to moving on.
Add 5 μL of the appropriate plasmid for each transformation performed. Vortex each tube to mix thoroughly. Incubate the samples at 30 °C for 45 min. Heat shock samples at 42 °C for 10 min.
Pellet cells for 3 min at > 800 x g at room temperature, carefully remove the transformation mix, and re-suspend samples in 300 μL of sterile ddH₂O. Pellet cells by repeating the spin above, carefully remove water, and re-suspend your samples in 200 μL of sterile ddH₂O.
Set up 1/10 and 1/100 dilutions for each transformed strain of yeast.
Using sterile technique plate 150 μL from each sample onto SC-leucine plates to select for the plasmids. Spread the cells uniformly and evenly and allow the plate to dry before inverting and incubating at 30 °C to grow for 48–72 h.
NOTE: Once the appropriate strain is generated, it may be stored long term in 25% glycerol at -80 °C. The quantification of copy number present can be determined by several methodologies, including qPCR, RNA-FISH, or another appropriate measure³⁷^,³⁸.

5. Determine the chronological life span to test for shortened CLS phenotype suppression

Test the effect of overexpression of the putative suppressor on CLS in the short-lived yeast, atg1Δ mutant, by determining the number of colony forming units (CFUs) that remain as a function of time³⁹.
NOTE: It is necessary to set up this portion of the experiment with the appropriate controls. A typical experiment will compare a wild type (WT) strain of yeast with the empty vector, WT with the suppressor vector, the deletion mutant with the empty vector, and the deletion mutant with the suppressor vector.
1. Take a single colony of the strain to study and inoculate it into SC-LEU media. Grow the culture at 30 °C for 72 h, with shaking.
2. Using a hemocytometer, determine the concentration of cells that are present in the culture⁴⁰.
3. Dilute an aliquot of the culture, so that the result is a uniform number of cells in a 150 µL volume of sterile water. Plate the culture using sterile technique onto SC-LEU plates and grow at 30 °C for 72 h. These plates are the day three time-point and the experiment will be normalized to this time-point as 100% viability³⁹.
  NOTE: The number of cells should be 200–500, sufficiently large for the analysis and a manageable number for counting. In this study, we used 200 cells for our plating quantity.
4. Continue to incubate the yeast cultures at 30 °C, taking regular aliquots and plating as outlined in 5.1.3. Continue this process until the strains are no longer viable, then compile and analyze the results.
  NOTE: The complete list of strains used in this study are found in Table 3.

Representative Results

As there are conflicting reports on the role of SIR2 during aging, we chose this gene for study as a potential suppressor of the atg1Δ mutant’s shorten CLS phenotype²⁶. The role of SIR2 is somewhat controversial, with conflicting reports on its role in extending CLS, however it has been clearly linked to increased CLS in at least one yeast background, with a role in both autophagy and mitophagy²²^,³¹^,³²^,⁴¹.

Our choice of plasmid vector is the pRS315 shuttle vector, which was constructed for ease of genetic manipulation, propagation, and maintenance in both budding yeast and bacteria⁴². This vector contains the LEU2 nutritional marker, the T7 and T3 promoters, and is a centromeric (CEN) vector for stable passage during cell division⁴². The stability of this vector across mitotic cell divisions were more desirable when compared to isogenic vectors that differed by nutritional marker⁴². The pRS315 vector also contains an autonomously replicating sequence, which combined with the CEN maintains low, consistent plasmid levels within (and across) a cell population⁴³.

The SIR2 gene and the corresponding upstream (5’ UTR) and downstream (3’ UTR) genomic region’s DNA sequence was obtained³³. To ensure that the transcribed gene contained the necessary components UTRs for stability and translation of the protein product, our initial window was +/- 400 bp. This window expanded to +/- 500bp based on the nucleotide composition within this region, as our initial window did not result in a region conducive for cloning. We designed PCR primers that allow for the amplification of the gene and corresponding regulatory regions, incorporating restriction digestion sites and a four-nucleotide overhang added to the 5’ end of each primer (Figure 1A). The successful amplification of this region by PCR results in a DNA fragment 2.469 kb in length (Figure 1B).

SIR2 was amplified by PCR, and the products of this reaction were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and compared to a no template control reaction (Figure 2). SIR2 amplification was seen in both lanes with the genomic DNA template; the two reactions were pooled and concentrated. Plasmid purification of pRS315 from E. coli was performed, which were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 3). The samples were quantified by spectrophotometry, and the plasmid prep from transformant #2 was selected for cloning, which had a concentration of 256 ng/µL (OD_260/280 = 1.87).

The plasmid and the insert were digested with HindIII and SacII, ligated together, and transformed into E. coli for amplification and screening. The choice of these restriction digestion sites required the verification that neither site is present in the region to be cloned. The presence of one (or both) sites would require the use of alternative restriction enzymes to clone the SIR2 gene, and there are several to select from in the pRS315 polylinker region⁴².

We screened transformants for successful creation of the pRS315-SIR2 vector by excision of the insert by double digestion with HindIII and SacII followed by the visualization on agarose gel (Figure 4). pRS315-SIR2 vector was transformed into both wild-type and the atg1Δ mutant to generate the strains used for CLS characterization. The pRS315 vector is a classical vector that has been widely used and characterized, which is one of the advantages of this particular system. The relative copy number was determined by qPCR (Figure 5) as previously described³⁷. This resulted in a modest increase in copy number from an average of one copy per cell to an average of 2.5 copies per cell, consistent with previous reports⁴².

The chronological lifespan of atg1Δ+pRS315-SIR2 was compared to an isogenic strain of yeast containing an empty vector instead of an insert (atg1Δ+pRS315). The aging cultures were plated at consistent, equivalent dilutions and were grown for 72 h at 30 ˚C prior to imaging and quantification (Figure 6A). The number of colonies forming units that grew was determined and normalized to the day 3 time-point (the first one taken) and plotted (Figure 6B). We report that there is no statistically significant effect of our SIR2 construct on the CLS in the atg1Δ background. Additionally, we did not see any extension of the CLS in the wild-type background – where our modest SIR2 overexpression actually produced a decrease in the CLS compared to the empty vector control (Figure 6B).

Figure 1: Design of the construct to clone SIR2. The genomic region flanking the SIR2 gene was utilized to design PCR primers for amplification and cloning of the gene. Primers contain 21nt of complementarity to the region 419 base pairs upstream of the gene (FP) and 351 base pairs downstream of the gene (RP), either the HindIII or SacII restriction digestion site, and a four-nucleotide overhang (A). The schematic of the amplicon created by PCR using the primers designed for cloning the SIR2 genic region, along with the corresponding sizes (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: PCR amplification of the SIR2 gene visualized by gel electrophoresis. The products of a high-fidelity PCR reaction to amplify the SIR2 gene were visualized on a 1% agarose gel (with ethidium bromide). Duplicate reactions were performed using yeast gDNA as a template (+) and compared to a no template control (-). The expected amplicon size is 2.469 kb. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Visualization of the pRS315 vector by gel electrophoresis. Duplicated purified plasmid reactions were performed and visualized on a 1% agarose gel (with ethidium bromide). The size of the pRS315 vector is 6.018 kb. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Screening for the pRS315-SIR2 vector by gel electrophoresis. Potential transformants that contain the pRS315-SIR2 vector were digested with HindIII and SacII, and then visualized on a 1% agarose gel (with ethidium bromide). Successful creation of the vector will yield a band at 5.963 kb (the pRS315 backbone) and 2.461 kb (the SIR2 gene). Two potential transformants were compared to an empty vector control. Transformant #1 exhibits the pattern expected by the pRS315-SIR2 vector. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: The pRS315-SIR2 vector increases SIR2 copy number in a wild type yeast background. The number of SIR2 copies present in the wild-type genetic background was determined by quantitative PCR. Values were calculated using the 2^-ΔΔCt method with ACT1 selected as an internal control⁴⁴. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: The chronological lifespan of atg1Δ+pRS315-SIR2. CLS was determined by quantification of the number of viable colony forming units as a function of time. Aging cultures of yeast were diluted to 500 cells/plate and grown for 72 h at 30 ˚C prior to imaging (A). Data was normalized to the day three time-point and plotted for visualization (B). EV is empty vector (pRS315 with no insert) and SIR2O/E contains the insert (pRS315-SIR2). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Component	Final Concentration
Nuclease-free water	Q.S. to final volume
Buffer	1X
dNTPs (conc: 10mM)	200uM
Forward Primer (conc: 10μM)	0.5μM
Reverse Primer(conc: 10μM)	0.5μM
Template gDNA	100-200ng
HF polymerase	1 unit/50μL PCR

Table 1: PCR reaction components.

Step	Temp	Time
Initial Denaturation	98°C	2mins
Cycling	98°C	30s
(35 cycles)	53-60°C (primer specific)	30s
	72°C	30s per kB
Final Extension	72°C	5-10m
Hold	10°C	indefinitely

Table 2: PCR cycling conditions.

Strain:	Parent:	Ploidy:
MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 + pRS315 (LEU vector)	BY4741	Haploid
MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 + pRS315-SIR2 O/E (LEU vector)	BY4741	Haploid
MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0atg1Δ + pRS315 empty vector (LEU vector)	BY4741	Haploid
MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0atg1Δ + pRS315-SIR2 O/E (LEU vector)	BY4741	Haploid

Table 3: Strains used.

Discussion

Unravelling the genetics of aging is a difficult challenge, with many opportunities for further study that can potentially yield significant insights into the complex interactions that exist. There are many methods that allow for the rapid generation of loss-of-function mutants for the study of null strains of yeast⁴⁵^,⁴⁶. This method presents a straightforward approach to identify and clone genes onto the pRS315 vector for overexpression suppressor studies. One advantage to this approach is that this allows for a moderate overexpression from a stable vector, which can avoid any unforeseen challenges that could arise from the use of a chromosomal integration⁴⁷. This approach is presented in a manner that will encourage the recruitment of researchers at various levels of their scientific career, with many of the authors on this publication contributing through the identification and cloning of putative suppressors as a component of their education.

In this work, we demonstrate how to use the wealth of data available compiled in the Saccharomyces genome database to identify a desired phenotype, in this case genetic links to an altered chronological lifespan. We cloned SIR2 into the pRS315 vector to test the effect of moderate overexpression on the CLS of the short-lived autophagy deficient mutant, atg1Δ. Throughout a 17-day aging time-course there was no effect seen on the CLS in the autophagy mutant and a more accelerated CLS seen in the wild-type background. This can be interpreted as the modest copy number increase in SIR2 does not have an effect on CLS in the atg1Δ mutant background. As ATG1 is a transcription factor necessary to induce autophagy, our conclusions are limited to initiation of the autophagy pathway. Additionally, we do not see an increase on the CLS in our wild type genetic background – perhaps suggesting that CLS extending phenotypes of increasing the copy number of SIR2 may be specific to certain genetic backgrounds and are not ubiquitous.

The critical steps within this protocol include the proper design of the SIR2 construct to clone, and the proper conditions to optimize ligation. Troubleshooting these steps may be necessary to clone a gene for characterization via the CLS assay. One limitation of this approach is that it selects for cells that retain the plasmid and that can re-enter the cell cycle. While this is a marker of fitness, it is essential for follow up study using complementary approaches to dissect the aging phenotype. This can include quantification of cell viability by vital dye staining as well as approaches that do not depend on plasmid retention. There are excellent methods available demonstrating further characterization of the CLS through the quantification of the outgrowth of aged cells or characterization of the replicative lifespan⁴⁸^,⁴⁹^,⁵⁰. Additionally, our approach is limited to the identification of interactions that are non-lethal, and it would be challenging to differentiate a failed attempt to clone a gene with a successful attempt to clone a gene that results in a lethal phenotype.

Our approach is useful for the identification of gene putative genetic interactions for further study. It is simple and straightforward, and thus far, we used this approach to clone SIR2, AIF1, UBI4, and MDH1 and are in the process of following up studies with each of these constructs. This technique can be applied to characterize any number of genetic interactions by following the protocol outline in this work.

Açıklamalar

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

James T. Arnone would like to acknowledge the support of the students in the Recombinant DNA Technologies course in 2017 and 2018 at William Paterson University who were involved in this project from its inception, but whose efforts did not cross the threshold for authorship: Christopher Andino, Juan Botero, Josephine Bozan, Brenda Calalpa, Brenda Cubas, Headtlove Essel Dadzie, Irvin Gamarra, Preciousgift Isibor, Wayne Ko, Nelson Mejia, Hector Mottola, Rabya Naz, Abdullah Odeh, Pearl Paguntalan, Daniel Raza’e, Gabriella Rector, Aida Shono, and Matthew So. You are great scientists and I miss you all!

The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable support of Instruction and Research Technology at William Paterson University for their help: Greg Mattison, Peter Cannarozzi, Rob Meyer, Dante Portella, and Henry Heinitsh. The authors would also like to acknowledge the Office of the Provost for ART support, the Office of the Dean and the Center for Research in the College of Science and Health their support of this work, and the Department of Biology for supporting this project.

Materials

Fungal/Bacterial DNA kit	Zymo Research	D6005
HindIIIHF enzyme	New England Biolabs	R3104S
Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase	New England Biolabs	M0530S
Plasmid miniprep kit	Qiagen	12123
SacII enzyme	New England Biolabs	R0157S
Salmon sperm DNA	Thermofisher	AM9680
T4 DNA ligase	New England Biolabs	M0202S

Referanslar

López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M., Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 153 (6), 1194-1217 (2013).
Kenyon, C. The genetics of ageing. Nature. 464 (7288), 504-512 (2010).
Petralia, R. S., Mattson, M. P., Yao, P. J. Aging and longevity in the simplest animals and the quest for immortality. Ageing Research Reviews. 16, 66-82 (2014).
Longo, V. D., Fabrizio, P. . Aging Research in Yeast. , 101-121 (2011).
Campisi, J. Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annual Review of Physiology. 75, 685-705 (2013).
Galkin, F., Zhang, B., Dmitriev, S. E., Gladyshev, V. N. Reversibility of irreversible aging. Ageing Research Reviews. 49, 104-114 (2019).
Khan, S. S., Singer, B. D., Vaughan, D. E. Molecular and physiological manifestations and measurement of aging in humans. Aging Cell. 16 (4), 624-633 (2017).
Riera, C. E., Merkwirth, C., De Magalhaes Filho, C. D., Dillin, A. Signaling networks determining life span. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 85, 35-64 (2016).
Powers, R. W., Kaeberlein, M., Caldwell, S. D., Kennedy, B. K., Fields, S. Extension of chronological life span in yeast by decreased TOR pathway signaling. Genes & Development. 20 (2), 174-184 (2006).
Lapierre, L. R., Hansen, M. Lessons from C. elegans: signaling pathways for longevity. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 23 (12), 637-644 (2012).
Fontana, L., Partridge, L., Longo, V. D. Extending healthy life span-from yeast to humans. Science. 328 (5976), 321-326 (2010).
Houtkooper, R. H., Pirinen, E., Auwerx, J. Sirtuins as regulators of metabolism and healthspan. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 13 (4), 225-238 (2012).
Bitto, A., et al. Transient rapamycin treatment can increase lifespan and healthspan in middle-aged mice. elife. 5, 16351 (2016).
Fang, E. F., et al. NAD+ replenishment improves lifespan and healthspan in ataxia telangiectasia models via mitophagy and DNA repair. Cell Metabolism. 24 (4), 566-581 (2016).
Kaeberlein, M., Kennedy, B. K. Large-scale identification in yeast of conserved ageing genes. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 126 (1), 17-21 (2005).
Fabrizio, P., et al. Genome-wide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies vacuolar protein sorting, autophagy, biosynthetic, and tRNA methylation genes involved in life span regulation. PLoS Genetics. 6 (7), (2010).
Longo, V. D., Shadel, G. S., Kaeberlein, M., Kennedy, B. Replicative and chronological aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Metabolism. 16 (1), 18-31 (2012).
He, C., Zhou, C., Kennedy, B. K. The yeast replicative aging model. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Basis of Disease. 1864 (9), 2690-2696 (2018).
Lee, S. S., Vizcarra, I. A., Huberts, D. H., Lee, L. P., Heinemann, M. Whole lifespan microscopic observation of budding yeast aging through a microfluidic dissection platform. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (13), 4916-4920 (2012).
Fabrizio, P., Longo, V. D. The chronological life span of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Aging Cell. 2 (2), 73-81 (2003).
Smith, J., Daniel, L., McClure, J. M., Matecic, M., Smith, J. S. Calorie restriction extends the chronological lifespan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae independently of the Sirtuins. Aging Cell. 6 (5), 649-662 (2007).
Orozco, H., Matallana, E., Aranda, A. Genetic manipulation of longevity-related genes as a tool to regulate yeast life span and metabolite production during winemaking. Microbial Cell Factories. 12 (1), 1 (2013).
Tissenbaum, H. A., Guarente, L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 410 (6825), 227-230 (2001).
Huang, W. P., Klionsky, D. J. Autophagy in yeast: a review of the molecular machinery. Cell Structure and Function. 27 (6), 409-420 (2002).
Barbosa, M. C., Grosso, R. A., Fader, C. M. Hallmarks of aging: an autophagic perspective. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 9, 790 (2019).
Aris, J. P., et al. Autophagy and leucine promote chronological longevity and respiration proficiency during calorie restriction in yeast. Experimental Gerontology. 48 (10), 1107-1119 (2013).
Cheong, H., Nair, U., Geng, J., Klionsky, D. J. The Atg1 kinase complex is involved in the regulation of protein recruitment to initiate sequestering vesicle formation for nonspecific autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 19 (2), 668-681 (2008).
Matsuura, A., Tsukada, M., Wada, Y., Ohsumi, Y. Apg1p, a novel protein kinase required for the autophagic process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 192 (2), 245-250 (1997).
Cherry, J. M., et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Research. 40, 700-705 (2012).
Engel, S. R., et al. The reference genome sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: then and now. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 4 (3), 389-398 (2014).
Imai, S. I., Armstrong, C. M., Kaeberlein, M., Guarente, L. Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature. 403 (6771), 795-800 (2000).
Sampaio-Marques, B., et al. SNCA (α-synuclein)-induced toxicity in yeast cells is dependent on Sir2-mediated mitophagy. Autophagy. 8 (10), 1494-1509 (2012).
Nagalakshmi, U., et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science. 320 (5881), 1344-1349 (2008).
De Boer, C. G., Hughes, T. R. YeTFaSCo: a database of evaluated yeast transcription factor sequence specificities. Nucleic Acids Research. 40, 169-179 (2012).
Sanders, E. R. Aseptic laboratory techniques: plating methods. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (63), e3064 (2012).
Gietz, R. D., Woods, R. A. . Methods in Enzymology. 350, 87-96 (2002).
Salvi, S., et al. Serum and plasma copy number detection using real-time PCR. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (130), e56502 (2017).
McIsaac, R. S., et al. Visualization and analysis of mRNA molecules using fluorescence in situ hybridization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (76), e50382 (2013).
Mirisola, M. G., Braun, R. J., Petranovic, D. Approaches to study yeast cell aging and death. FEMS Yeast Research. 14 (1), 109-118 (2014).
Ricardo, R., Phelan, K. Counting and determining the viability of cultured cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (16), e752 (2008).
Lin, S. J., Guarente, L. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, a metabolic regulator of transcription, longevity and disease. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 15 (2), 241-246 (2003).
Sikorski, R. S., Hieter, P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetik. 122 (1), 19-27 (1989).
Romanos, M. A., Scorer, C. A., Clare, J. J. Foreign gene expression in yeast: a review. Yeast. 8 (6), 423-488 (1992).
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. 29 (9), 45 (2001).
Storici, F., Resnick, M. A. The delitto perfetto approach to in vivo site-directed mutagenesis and chromosome rearrangements with synthetic oligonucleotides in yeast. Methods in Enzymology. 409, 329-345 (2006).
DiCarlo, J. E., et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Research. 41 (7), 4336-4343 (2013).
Arnone, J. T. Genomic Considerations for the Modification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Biofuel and Metabolite Biosynthesis. Microorganisms. 8 (3), (2020).
Murakami, C., Kaeberlein, M. Quantifying yeast chronological life span by outgrowth of aged cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (27), e1156 (2009).
Steffen, K. K., Kennedy, B. K., Kaeberlein, M. Measuring replicative life span in the budding yeast. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (28), e1209 (2009).
Huberts, D. H., Janssens, G. E., Lee, S. S., Vizcarra, I. A., Heinemann, M. Continuous high-resolution microscopic observation of replicative aging in budding yeast. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (78), e50143 (2013).

Etiketler

Suppressor Screen Genetic Links Chronological Lifespan Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Aging Dietary Restriction Hallmarks Of Aging Budding Yeast Autophagy Over-expression Suppressor Screen

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Bu Makaleden Alıntı Yapın

Dix, C., Sgro, S., Patel, A., Perrotta, C., Eldabagh, N., Lomauro, K. L., Miguez, F. W., Chohan, P., Jariwala, C., Arnone, J. T. A Suppressor Screen for the Characterization of Genetic Links Regulating Chronological Lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Vis. Exp. (163), e61506, doi:10.3791/61506 (2020).