Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on unrestrained awake dogs is a new method with several advantages over imaging with physical or chemical restraint. This protocol introduces a cost-effective training method that minimizes training in the MRI environment, which can be expensive, and maximizes the subject pool available for canine functional MRI.
We present a canine functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) training protocol that can be done in a cost-effective manner, with high-energy dogs, for acquisition of functional and structural data. This method of training dogs for awake, unrestrained fMRI employs a generalization procedure of stationing in several dissimilar locations to facilitate transfer of the stationing behavior to the real MRI scan environment; it does so without the need for extensive training time in the MRI scan environment, which can be expensive. Further, this method splits the training of a stationing (i.e., chin rest) behavior from desensitization to the MRI environment (i.e., 100+ decibel scan audio), the latter accomplished during dedicated Auditory Exposure conditioning sessions. The complete training and testing protocol required 14 hours and resulted in immediate transfer to novel locations. We also present examples of canine fMRI data that have been acquired from visual face processing and olfactory discrimination paradigms.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted on unrestrained awake dogs is a new method, creating a fresh way to examine function and structure in the dog brain. The first published accounts of MR image acquisition from unrestrained awake dogs were published in 2009 (structural) and 2012 (functional)1,2. There are several advantages of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for studying brain function in unrestrained awake dogs. First, the data collection is similar to that of humans, and therefore more readily generalizable across species3. Second, there is no need for anesthesia, eliminating any undesirable aftereffects. Third, brain activity is altered by anesthesia and hence cognitive function can be better assessed without anesthesia4. Fourth, while fluid/food deprivation and physical restraint allow researchers to probe nonsedated animals (e.g., rodent, avian, and primate models), those animals can be in very different cognitive states from their non-deprived and unrestrained counterparts3.
At the moment, there are five laboratories around the world that are scanning awake dogs (Atlanta, USA; Auburn, USA; Budapest, Hungary; Querétaro, Mexico; Vienna, Austria), and there is no standardized method for training dogs to willfully undergo an MRI scan5,6,7. All the training methods share the common goal of training dogs to remain still for extended periods of time, which is necessary for quality brain scans. While all methods work via the principles of reinforcement learning, how exactly it is implemented varies, and we do not yet know the impact of this variance on the results. Therefore, if a proposed training method is accepted and comes to be widely used, it may reduce some amount of undesirable variance in the data. In this article, we focus on the training method for stationing in the MRI scanner. MRI scanning is expensive, and the proposed method we developed has the purpose of being cost-effective and thus generalizable to trainers around the world without regular access to an MRI scanner for training.
The method consists of two major components: training and testing. Training consists of two phases. Phase one is training the dog to chin target (i.e., station) in an open environment and phase two is training the dog to station in a mock MRI. Desensitization to the MRI occurs throughout the training phases, during separate, dedicated Auditory Exposure sessions. Testing consists of stationing in a portable mock MRI, in five different testing locations. The utility of this testing phase is to generalize the stationing behavior, facilitating transfer to the real MRI environment. The overall protocol is summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Protocol timeline. The protocol timeline is divided into two components, Training and Testing. Training is further divided into two phases, Open Environment and Mock MRI. Separate Auditory Exposure sessions occur during training as well. Testing consists of stationing in a portable mock MRI, in five different transfer locations (T1-T5). Once the dog has generalized the stationing behavior to criterion in five distinct transfer locations, the dog is ready for data collection in the real MRI environment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Depending on the phase, training and testing takes 25 to 75 minutes per week, per dog: one 10-minute Auditory Exposure session and two or more 5 to 30-minute Stationing sessions. This protocol can be completed in 25 weeks. During transfer testing, dogs execute several bouts of a 5-minute motionless down/stay and chin rest in a portable mock MRI (bore, radiofrequency coil, 90+ dB audio, ear padding) in five dissimilar locations. Transfer sessions occur once per week for 30-60 minutes, over five consecutive weeks. During MRI testing, dogs execute several bouts of the final stationing behavior during a 60-minute session of structural and functional data acquisition in a real MRI scanner.
Throughout training and testing, a chin rest is the behavior of focus. A chin rest is the dog touching his chin to an object's surface following some cue to target (i.e., rest his chin) to that surface. That cue to target can be physical (e.g., gesture, lure), verbal (e.g., spoken word "rest"), or an object (e.g., access to the chin rest itself). Fluent performance of the chin targeting behavior is critical to limiting head motion. In this protocol, the chin rest behavior is conditioned, maintained, and generalized to occur in multiple contexts (different rest apparatuses, in multiple locations) with increasing target duration (up to five minutes). Additionally, the trainer conditions and maintains strong performance of behaviors down and stay, as well as good stimulus control over the release cue "Okay," the conditioned reinforcer and behavioral event marker "click," and the Keep Going Signal (KGS) "good"8. Over the course of the protocol, multiple stimuli and apparatuses are introduced at specific stages and for specific intervals. These materials are easily and inexpensively procured. For full details, see the Table of Materials.
Ethical approval for these methods was obtained from the Auburn University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and all methods were performed in accordance with their guidelines and regulations. For auditory exposure, progression through the sessions is based on week number. For stationing sessions, a specific session-specified performance criterion (e.g., at least eleven-second duration of chin targeting), must be met before the trainer may advance the dog to the next session in that training phase. Otherwise, that step is repeated.
1. Auditory Exposure sessions
NOTE: These sessions constitute passive exposure and active classical counterconditioning of a positive Conditioned Emotional Response (CER) to MRI scanner noise; the scanner noise is established as a stimulus predicting the access to toy play or food rewards. Exposure sessions occur once per week for approximately 10 min.
Figure 2: Active Exposure. Active Exposure (AE) is a short-delay classical conditioning procedure. 10 s CS (i.e., scan audio presented by itself), 20 s CS + US (i.e., ball and scan audio presented together), 10 s delay (no ball, no scan audio). After this delay, the trial starts over. There are ten trials per session, with incremental volume increases over sessions. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
NOTE: Collect the following audio: MRI scanner baseline, shim, localizer (scout), MPRAGE, GRE Field, EPI, Multiband EPI, DTI, and RESOLVE DTI, using, for example, a smartphone's audio recording app through the open door of a 3T MRI suite during phantom scans. Determine volume level of audio playback during training sessions via a decibel meter phone app.
2. Stationing sessions
NOTE: These sessions are divided into two phases: Open environment and Mock MRI. After the chin-to-object target is learned, durations are increased on a percentile schedule of 10% increases. As new elements and pieces of equipment are added into the training context, certain criteria of the behavior (e.g., duration) are temporarily relaxed:
1) In the stationing sessions, the trainer trains a nose-touch behavior to a folded towel and then a chin rest on a folded towel. That chin rest behavior is generalized to occur in a foam chin rest and gradually built to a 5 min bout duration.
2) Simultaneously, robust down and stay behaviors are built and maintained.
3) Those behaviors are then conditioned to occur in an enclosed space (i.e., tunnel) and at a 3' elevation.
4) The dog is then acclimated to the head enclosure (mock human extremity RF coil).
5) Ear padding is introduced, and scan audio is (re)introduced in the context of the stationing behavior.
The dog will ultimately be able to perform a robust chin rest with head and body enclosed at a 3' elevation, with ear padding and scan audio playing at 90 + decibels (dB), for at least 5 min bouts. On reinforcement – some dogs are inherently more motivated by food, whereas others are more motivated by play or praise9. In "click-then-treat" (C/T), the T does not necessarily mean food treats, rather it refers to the reward procedure, whatever that may be for that particular dog at that particular stage in its training. Although food rewards lend themselves to higher rates and stiller repetitions of behavior, whatever the dog prefers can be used initially, even if it is high-motion play (e.g., ball, tug). As the chin target behavior becomes more resilient against distraction and duration, transition to using food rewards. Eventually, toy play can be saved for long-duration or chained bouts of chin rest performance.
3. Transfer
NOTE: 1) Upon reaching final criterion of the stationing behavior in the mock MRI training location (5 min down-stay and chin rest in mock bore and mock RF coil while wearing ear padding, with scanner noise playing at 80-110 dB), the dog undergoes five distinct location transfer (generalization) sessions. During these transfer sessions the dog stations to the above criteria in several indoor and outdoor locations that are as unique as possible, with different sights, sounds, and degrees of social distraction across settings (e.g., secluded grass field, quiet academic building hallway, busy academic building lobby, crowded bus stop, loud water treatment plant)8.
4. MRI
The mean number of repetitions of each session level is listed in Table 1. The complete training and testing protocol required 14 h (M = 13.55 h, range 12-16 h) and consisted of 90 sessions (range 87-93 sessions). Open environment training lasted 4.38 h (range 3-5 h), mock MRI training lasted 5.4 h (range 4.2-6.5 h), and transfer was 2.5 h divided into five 30 min sessions. Maintenance sessions at level 19 were conducted during transfer and are reflected in the complete training time above.
Session Level | Kriterler | Duration | Session Repetitions (M, SE) | |
Open Environment | 1. Charge the clicker | Build an association between the ‘tic-toc’ of the clicker and the dog’s primary reward (e.g., food) while capturingattention. | 3 min | 1, 0 |
2. Capture chin target to towel | Build chin-to-towel contact to 2+ seconds. * | 5 min | 3.75, .75 | |
3. Chin-to-towel target with short duration and addition and a cue | Chin contact for 7+ seconds. * | 5 min | 8.25, 2.8 | |
4. Chin rest on towel in a down and addition of distraction | Chin contact for 11+ seconds, with and without distraction. | 5-10 min | 2.75, .25 | |
5. Chin rest on towel with distance | Chin contact for 16+ seconds, cued from progressively farther away (i.e., sitting on ground, kneeling, standing). | 5-10 min | 3.5, .87 | |
6. Chin rest on towel with increasing duration and distance | Chin contact for 26+ seconds. | 5-10 min | 5.5, 1.5 | |
7. Introduce foam chin rest, duration initially reduced | Chin contact to foam chin rest for 40+ seconds. | 5-15 min | 4.75, .75 | |
8. Chin rest in foam chin rest with increasing duration and distraction | Chin contact for 73+ seconds. | 5-15 min | 6, 1.2 | |
Mock MRI | 9. Introduce bore and elevation with reduced duration | Chin contact in bore on table for 16+ seconds. ** | 5-15 min | 2.5, .5 |
10. Elevated chin rest with increasing duration | Chin contact in bore on table for 60+ seconds. | 5-15 min | 3, 0 | |
11. Introduce mock radiofrequency (RF) coil with no elevation and reduced duration | Chin contact in RF coil on ground for 30+ seconds. | 5-15 min | 2.75, .25 | |
12. Elevated chin rest in mock RF coil | Chin contact to foam chin rest through the mock RF coil in the elevated bore for 50+ seconds. | 5-15 min | 2, 0 | |
13. Elevated chin rest in mock RF coil with increasing distraction and duration | Chin contact for 100+ seconds, with and without distraction. | 5-15 min | 2.5, .29 | |
14. Introduce ear padding, duration initially reduced | Chin contact in mock bore and RF coil (mock MRI) with ear padding for 60+ seconds. | 5-15 min | 3, .41 | |
15. Elevated chin rest in mock RF coil with ear padding and increasing duration and distraction | Chin contact for 107 seconds, with and without distractions. | 5-15 min | 2.5, .29 | |
16. Introduce scanner noise | Chin contact in mock MRI with ear padding and up to 40 dB scan audio for 107+ seconds. | 10-30 min | 2.5, .5 | |
17. Build duration to 2 minutes 30 seconds with increasing distance | Chin contact in mock MRI with ear padding and 41-70 dB scan audio for 142+ seconds, with and without distraction and distance. | 10-30 min | 2.5, .5 | |
18. Build duration to 4 minutes | Chin contact in mock MRI with ear padding and 60-90 dB scan audio for 240+ seconds, with and without distraction and distance. | 10-30 min | 2.75, .75 | |
19. Build duration to 5 minutes | Chin contact in mock MRI with ear padding and 80-110 dB scan audio for 300+ seconds, with and without distraction and distance. | 10-30 min | 10, 1.8 | |
Transfer | 20. Five distinct location transfer (generalization) sessions | During these transfer sessions the dog stations to the above criteria in several indoor and outdoor locations that are as unique as possible, with different sights, sounds, and degrees of social distraction across settings. | 30 min | 5, 0 |
Tümü | Final behavior(s) | The dog performs a chin rest with head and body enclosed at a 3’ elevation, with ear padding and scan audio playing at 90 + dB, for at least five minutes. | 12-16 h (M=13.55, SE=0.94) | 87-93 sessions (M=90, SE=1.5) |
Table 1: Session levels. *See note in manuscript. **Conduct first session with mock bore on ground.
Stationing training and testing
Figure 3 shows the maximum duration of four dogs trained in the protocol for the last three sessions at the end of training and the different training locations. Performance was stable at the end of stationing training, F(2, 6) < 1, and over 5 min (M = 311 seconds, SEM = 1.9). All dogs transferred to the mock training locations with a max duration equivalent to training, F(1,3) < 1. Three of the dogs transferred to the MRI scanner and demonstrated repeated bouts of the max possible duration (206 s). The one dog that did not transfer to the MRI scanner had a larger head than the other dogs and could not comfortably fit within the coil. This discomfort likely led to the dog not willingly participating in the scans.
Figure 3: Maximum duration of four dogs trained in the protocol for the last three sessions at the end of training and the different training locations. All dogs transferred to the mock training locations and three of the dogs transferred to the MRI scanner demonstrating the maximum possible duration (206 s). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Representative fMRI stimulus driven scans
In these scans, visual or odor stimuli were presented to the dog while the dog remains still. Visual stimuli were projected on a screen located in the bore of the scanner. Each scan lasted for 140 s and contained 12 different images (e.g., human and dog faces). A stimulus was presented for 5 s followed by a variable 3-11 s inter-stimulus interval (see Figure 4 for visual depiction and Thompkins et al. 2018 for additional details)10.
Figure 4: Visual stimuli. The top panel shows an example run of dog faces. The bottom panel shows an example run of human faces. Face stimuli were displayed for 5 s, with 3-11 s inter-stimulus intervals. Twelve face stimuli were shown per run. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Attentional check
To determine whether dogs were attending to the visual stimuli, independent raters viewed videos of the dogs' eyes inside the bore of the MRI scanner synced up with the stimulus presentation. Based on whether the dogs' eyes were open and their pupils visible, the raters assigned an appropriate score for each stimulus (Figure 5). fMRI data was used only when there was perfect inter-rater agreement.
Figure 5: Attentional check. To ensure each dog looked at each stimulus presented during scanning, stimulus-synchronized video of the dog's eye inside the scanner was analyzed by two raters post hoc; for each trial, if the dog's eye was visibly open, the rater assigned a score of "yes" and if the dog's eye was closed, the rater assigned a score of "no." fMRI data was used only when there was perfect inter-rater agreement. This figure has been modified from Thompkins et al.10 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Dog and human face processing
Figure 6 shows adjacent but different brain areas of temporal cortex in the dog brain are active for processing dog and human faces. Green regions represent areas of the brain more active for human faces contrasted with dog faces (p < 0.05, FDR (false discovery rate corrected)). Red regions represent areas of the brain more active for dog faces contrasted with human faces (p < 0.05, FDR).
Figure 6: Results of human and dog face contrasts. Regions in green represent areas that are significantly more active during processing of human faces as compared to dog faces (i.e., human face area, HFA). Regions in red represent areas that are significantly more active during processing of dog faces as compared to human faces (i.e., dog face area, DFA). This figure has been modified from Thompkins et al.10 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Odor stimuli
Odor stimuli were delivered through an olfactometer (Figure 7); high (0.16 mM) and low (0.016 mM) concentrations of odorant ethyl butyrate were used to probe parametric modulation of olfactory areas by odorant concentration. Each scan lasted 200 s and contained 5 blocks of 10 s odorant stimulation, each followed by a 30 s inter-stimulus interval (see Figure 8 for visual depiction and Jia et al. 2014 for additional details)4.
Figure 7: Olfactory imaging system. Components of the dog olfactory imaging system outside the MRI room showing odorant applicator, air tank, motion parameter recording palmtop, video monitor, laptop with VT-8 software, and the entrance port to the MRI room. This figure has been modified from Jia et al.4 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Odorant delivery. Odorant delivery was controlled by VT-8 Warner Timer software in a fMRI block design. The first row shows the odorant delivery sequence with green arrows indicating stimulus onset and red arrows indicating stimulus offset. The second row shows clearance of odorant, with green arrows indicating onset of odorant clearance and red arrows indicating offset of odorant clearance. The third row shows the fMRI block design, matching the first row, with "0" and "1" denoting odorant "off" and "on" conditions, respectively. This figure has been modified from Jia et al.4 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Researchers delivered high (0.16 mM) and low (0.016mM) concentrations of an ethyl butyrate solution to six trained detection canines (Labradors) while awake and anesthetized. The parametric increases in magnitude of activation to low and high concentrations of odorant in olfactory regions (olfactory bulb, bilateral piriform lobes, cerebellum) was in accordance with Weber's Law (threefold perceived increase for a tenfold concentration increase). In addition, while the olfactory bulb, periamygdala, anterior olfactory cortex, entorhinal cortex, and piriform lobes were active in both awake and anesthetized dogs, regions implicating higher-order cognitive processing (superior, medial and orbital portions of frontal cortex) were activated mainly in awake dogs (Figure 9).
Figure 9: Group activation maps for anesthetized dogs. Three orthogonal views are shown in each subfigure. Colormap is used for activation intensity and important areas are indicated by arrows with labels (Overall FDR = 0.05, cluster threshold = 15 voxels using AlphaSim, t-contrast). A: Anterior, P: posterior, S: superior, I: inferior, L: left, R: right. Subfigure (A) corresponds to low concentration odorant (0.016 mM), subfigure (B) corresponds to high concentration odorant (0.16 mM), subfigure (C) corresponds to anesthetized dog olfactory processing, and subfigure (D) corresponds to awake dog olfactory processing. This figure has been modified from Jia et al.4 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The protocol described above separates the training of the stationing (chin rest) behavior from desensitization to the MRI environment. Further, it utilizes a generalization procedure of stationing in several dissimilar locations, to assist in the transfer of the stationing behavior to the real MRI scan environment; it does so without the need for extensive training time in the MRI scan environment, which can be expensive. Overall, the training and testing was completed in 14 hours and resulted in immediate transfer to novel locations. Although it is difficult to compare methods across laboratories in a meaningful way at this time, we present a canine fMRI training protocol that can be completed in a cost-effective manner, with high-energy dogs.
Regarding the generalization of this training protocol to other trainers, while we used kenneled purpose-bred detection dogs, this protocol should bode well for other dog populations. Detection dogs are typically repurposed American Field Trial, Hunt Test, and Upland Game dogs with intrinsically high energy and "high drive"11. The term "drive," referring to the dog's intrinsic motivation to work, is both difficult to operationalize and measure, and widespread in its use to characterize dogs that are most suitable for detection work; the industry favors and selects for bold, excitable, high-energy dogs, with higher baseline levels of arousal (i.e., excitement, anxiety) than other types of working dogs and pets12. If such dogs can be trained to station, other populations should be successful too. Further, dogs were able to station in a variety of locations, including the real MRI scanner. As for pet dogs, whether or not the training protocol can be successful is an empirical question. Notably, with proper instruction, all of the training steps can be implemented in the home environment with the portable mock bore.
Clicker training, successive approximation, and classical-counter conditioning are methods used to condition behavior in a diverse range of species, from laboratory mice to wild animals in captivity8. The methods are forgiving with respect to small mistakes made throughout the training process (e.g., marking and reinforcing the wrong behavior, lack of interest in the reward)13. The same dimensions that make the methods more forgiving for novice teachers also make them more universal to the animal learners; by increasing the success rate of more dogs in the subject pool and more types of dogs (e.g., special population detection dogs), one can begin to combat an inherent selection bias due to subject and potentially reduce data attrition. This bias afflicts experimental samples and stems from an inability of the method to adapt to individual variability in temperament and tractability for an apparatus-oriented task that necessitates high levels of patience and impulse control, as is required for stationing for MRI. In reducing attrition, this method provides support for two out of the three R's (replacement, reduction, and refinement) for the best practices of experimental design with animal subjects14. Fewer subjects are needed when fewer of the procured subject pool are expected to attrite out of training, and fewer scan sessions are needed with less of the data having to be censored out due to high amplitude or frequent motion artifacting, a potentially noteworthy reduction. The training minimizes pain and distress of the animal learner in acquiring this task, a potentially noteworthy refinement.
The training materials are easily and inexpensively procured. The classical counter conditioning and generalization elements of this method reduce stress and novelty of the scanner environment, without the need for several expensive training hours in a rented scanner environment. Without training in the MRI environment, the trainer is unable to replicate the static magnetic field within the scanner bore or the unusually high/low frequency audio emissions of the scan sequences; this limitation is potentially addressed because theoretically, these dimensions are lumped into a 'variability' component from performing the behavior in diverse settings during training.
Another limitation is that this protocol is not optimized for speed. The stationing behavior can be conditioned in thirteen hours of training, which over six months equates to approximately 80 five to fifteen-minute training sessions. The methodological approach is "slow and correct," instead of "fast and fix it later". A mentality of "fast and fix it later" leads to potential sensitization of the scanning environment, and subsequent attrition of data or entire subjects. In a study of lexical processing in dogs, researchers were able to collect data at a success rate of 80% on a given dog's first attempt. If a dog needed a second attempt, success dropped to 16%, and just 4% if the dog needed a third attempt, suggesting that those dogs became detrimentally sensitized to the scanning environment with repeated exposure15. The protocol described above will likely not work on all dogs, and methodological alternatives include using a nose-to-target stick behavior instead of a chin rest behavior, implementing longer training sessions, and increasing the frequency of the training sessions. One could pre-screen for more suitable subjects (e.g., tractability, temperament, head size), although the trade-off with selection bias persists, and further, the more difficult-to-train dogs might be model pathologies of interest: disordered anxiety, aggression, special population working dogs (e.g., those selected for high-drive/energy). To better compare methods of acclimating and training for stationing in the MRI, we would need more dogs and more trainers. A strength of the work done at Auburn University is the researcher's access to the "Auburn Dog" population through Canine Performance Sciences (CPS). The detection dogs used in these studies have similar genetics and near-identical rearing and training histories.
Independent of training method, certain technological improvements could enhance the fidelity of canine MRI data, including improved radiofrequency coil design to facilitate imaging of canine cranial anatomy, as well as improved hardware and sequences to quiet the scanner during data acquisition7. Awake, unrestrained fMRI has provided cognitive insights into the canine psyche with respect to multimodal learning, executive function, stimulus processing, and reward processing6,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,30,31. Comparative and translational researchers can examine multiple sensory modalities with this imaging technique. The technique can be used to probe information processing in special working populations (e.g., signal processing in service dogs and parametric odor processing in detection dogs)4,28. These techniques have translational utility when it comes to determining operational potential and suitability to a working role; as a convergent technique alongside genetic and behavioral analyses, information gained from MR stimulus-presentation paradigms can inform selection of suitable working dog phenotypes for breeding purposes.
Many training strategies come from marine mammal and zoo animal training practices, adapted from Skinner, to approximate husbandry procedures via reinforcement-based enrichment and training8. Routine veterinary procedures (weight-taking, nail clipping, blood draws), or anything uncomfortable or anxiety-provoking, can be facilitated with reinforcement by successive approximation following a dedicated training plan, modeled after the one suggested here for canine fMRI. Awake, unrestrained MRI has even been discussed as having clinical utility in its own right for epileptic dogs29.
In summary, canine fMRI is in its nascent stages. We have presented a humane training program that can be successfully implemented in a cost-effective manner. The future is promising for the continued use of "man's best friend" in understanding, brain-behavior relationships as the field of cognitive neuroscience continues to evolve.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We are grateful to Canine Performance Sciences and Auburn University Departments of Psychology and Electrical & Computer Engineering. This work was supported by the Association of Professional Dog Trainers.
Acrylic Mock Radiofrequency Coil | Menards | TU59018594 | Mock Radiofrequency (RF) Coil: 8" diameter x 4' Concrete Form Tube. Makes four mock RF coils; cut form tube in four even lengths for four 8" diameter x 1' mock RF coils. |
Agility Tunnel | J&J Dog Supplies | TT053 | Open Agility Training Tunnel |
Bluetooth Speaker | Sharkk | SP-SK896WTR-GRY | Portable Scan Audio Playback: Waterproof Bluetooth Speaker Sharkk 2O IP67 Bluetooth Speaker Outdoor Pool Beach and Shower Portable Wireless Speaker |
Cardboard Concrete Form Tube | Menards | TU10120014 | Stationary Mock MRI Bore: Sonotube 24" diameter x 12' Standard Wall Water-Resistant Concrete Form. Makes two mock bores; cut form tube in half for two 24" diameter x 6' bores. |
Chuckit Ball | Chuckit! | 17030 | Toy Reward: Chuckit! Ultra Ball |
Decibel X | Skypaw | Decibel meter phone app | |
Exercise Mat | Foam chin rest: cut mat in half lengthwise. Roll up, and secure roll with hot glue. Cut chin-size notch in center with X-ACTO knife. Hot-glue velcro to bottom surface. | ||
Folding Table | 3' x 6' folding table | ||
Microfiber Car Wax Applicator Pad | Viking Car Care | 862400 | Viking Car Care Microfiber Applicator Pads |
Natural Balance Treat Log | Natual Balance | 236020 | Food Reward: E.g., Chicken Formula Dog Food Roll, 3.5-lb roll |
Plywood | Platform: 2"x4"x6' length of wood affixed to 3'x6' plywood board. Hot glue exercise mat on plywood board for traction. Braces: 3 4x4x4" cubes cut at 45-degree angle affixed to ends of 1"x4"x3' lengths of wood. Makes 3 braces. | ||
Sand Bags | J&J Dog Supplies | AG155 | J&J Professional Quality Sandbags x 2 |
Speaker System | Pioneer Electrics | HTD645DV | Stationary Scan Audio Playback: Pioneer HTD645DV 5 Disk DVD Home Theater System with Wireless Surround Speakers. Operating Instructions. |
Towel | standard towel |