Methods are described for thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) separation of plant extracts and contact bioautography to identify antibacterial metabolites. The methods are applied to the screening of red clover phenolic compounds inhibiting hyper ammonia-producing bacteria (HAB) native to the bovine rumen.
A common screen for plant antimicrobial compounds consists of separating plant extracts by paper or thin-layer chromatography (PC or TLC), exposing the chromatograms to microbial suspensions (e.g. fungi or bacteria in broth or agar), allowing time for the microbes to grow in a humid environment, and visualizing zones with no microbial growth. The effectiveness of this screening method, known as bioautography, depends on both the quality of the chromatographic separation and the care taken with microbial culture conditions. This paper describes standard protocols for TLC and contact bioautography with a novel application to amino acid-fermenting bacteria. The extract is separated on flexible (aluminum-backed) silica TLC plates, and bands are visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light. Zones are cut out and incubated face down onto agar inoculated with the test microorganism. Inhibitory bands are visualized by staining the agar plates with tetrazolium red. The method is applied to the separation of red clover (Trifolium pratense cv. Kenland) phenolic compounds and their screening for activity against Clostridium sticklandii, a hyper ammonia-producing bacterium (HAB) that is native to the bovine rumen. The TLC methods apply to many types of plant extracts and other bacterial species (aerobic or anaerobic), as well as fungi, can be used as test organisms if culture conditions are modified to fit the growth requirements of the species.
Assaying for antimicrobial compounds in plants requires separating the components of a plant extract, exposing a test microorganism to those components, and determining whether the microorganism’s growth is inhibited by any of the compounds. Separations by paper or thin-layer chromatography (PC or TLC) are convenient because many compounds can be separated on a planar surface. Separation is based on polarity, with some compounds binding tightly to the adsorbent (cellulose in the case of PC, and a variety of adsorbents in the case of TLC) and migrating less than others1. Figure 1 provides an example of the relative positions of polar and nonpolar phenolic compounds after separation on a silica TLC plate.
Figure 1. Diagram illustrating distributions of compounds of different polarities after separation on a silica thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) plate. Phenolic compounds of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) are used as an example. Polar compounds, such as clovamide, have a strong affinity for a polar adsorbent like silica and remain near the origin (OR), while less polar compounds, such as the three isoflavones near the solvent front (SF), partition more readily into the solvents (which are less polar than silica unless water, acids, or bases are included) and migrate farther up the plate.
After separation of an extract on a TLC plate, test microorganisms can be exposed to all compounds on the plate, thus speeding the identification of the active components of an extract2. If a fungal or bacterial culture is exposed to the chromatogram, microbial growth will occur everywhere except over areas with growth-inhibitory compounds. Zones of inhibition then can be visualized by observing the contrast between mycelial growth and the growth-free areas if fungi have been applied3 or by spraying with compounds that change color when reduced or hydrolyzed by living cells4. Although the use of paper or thin-layer chromatograms for antimicrobial assays was first applied to antibiotics5 and fungicides3,6, plant extracts are now frequently screened for antimicrobial compounds with this method, often referred to as bioautography. The protocols described herein apply to bioautography of thin-layer chromatograms. TLC is widely used because it is relatively rapid and can be performed on different adsorbents (e.g. silica, starch, alumina), as well as providing good resolution and sensitivity1.
Plant extracts can be prepared for TLC in many ways. Common methods include extracting plant material in alcohol-water mixtures such as 80% ethanol7,8, possibly with the addition of acid or base9. Following an extraction in such solvents, which contain some water and are possibly acidic or basic, extracts must be concentrated so that they can be applied to TLC plates in a minimal volume. The concentration of alcohol-water extracts can be achieved by partitioning with water-immiscible organic solvents8 or with a mixture of such solvents, such as ethyl acetate-ethyl ether (1:1, v/v)10,11. Different plant metabolites are extracted into different organic solvents, depending on their polarities. To ensure that plant organic acids or bases are extracted into organic solvents at this stage, the pH of an alcohol-water extract can be raised or lowered with a water-soluble acid or base to convert dissociated analytes into their nondissociated forms, which are then soluble in neutral organic solvents9. The organic phase can then be evaporated under reduced pressure or under nitrogen and adjusted to the desired volume for TLC. The pH of the extract is unlikely to be lethal to bioassay microorganisms due to the partitioning of analytes into neutral solvents, small final volume, and evaporation of the extract on the TLC plate prior to separation.
Both fungi and bacteria are employed as test microorganisms in bioautography of plant extracts2. Spores of some fungi, such as Cladosporium cucumerinum, germinate on TLC plates (apart from areas with inhibitory compounds) if sprayed onto plates in a nutrient solution and incubated in a moist environment for several days3. The dark mycelium of C. cucumerinum on noninhibitory zones provides a sharp contrast to zones free of mycelial growth. Although bacteria have been applied to thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates in the same manner4,12, bacteria are also poured over TLC plate surfaces in agar overlays13,14. Yeast, such as Candida albicans, can be applied in agar overlays as well14. Alternatively, TLC plates can be placed face down onto agar inoculated with bacteria10,15 or yeast8, a method known as contact bioautography2.
We describe a method for contact bioautography to screen for antimicrobial phenolic compounds from red clover (Trifolium pratense cv. Kenland). The test microorganism is Clostridium sticklandii, a ruminal hyper ammonia-producing bacterium (HAB) and obligate anaerobe. Although the separations used do not resolve all components of the extract, they facilitate identification of zones of antimicrobial activity, thus narrowing the pool of possible antimicrobial compounds. The protocol utilizes standard procedures for TLC1. The protocol also describes some of the techniques required for culturing obligate anaerobes for such an assay, a usage of contact bioautography15 and a visualization method with a tetrazolium salt, which stains living cells2,4.
1. Preparation of Plant Extract
2. Preparation of Thin-layer Plates
3. Preparation of Developing Chambers for Extract Separation
4. Loading and Development of TLC Plates
5. Preparation of Plates for Bioassay
6. Bacterial Culture and Assay
7. Visualization of Bioassayed Agar Plates
Representative silica TLC separations of red clover (Trifolium pratense cv. Kenland) extracts, containing phenolic compounds, are shown in Figure 2. Separation of red clover extract in ethyl acetate-hexane (9:1, v/v), over 8.5 cm, resulted in five bands, one incompletely resolved from the origin (Figure 2A). However, Figure 2B demonstrates that about twice as many bands were revealed when a different sample of red clover extract (from the same cultivar, but grown in a separate plot at the same farm) was separated over a greater distance (15 cm instead of 8.5 cm) and with two successive developments in different solvent systems. The chromatogram of Figure 2B was developed first in ethyl acetate-hexane (9:1, v/v), and then allowed to dry and separated in ethyl acetate-methanol (78:22, v/v). These results demonstrate that both plate size and choice of solvent system (or series of solvent systems) can affect the number of compounds separated on a chromatogram. In this particular case, elution and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of bands from other TLC separations of the same extracts confirmed that the compounds remaining at or near the origin consisted primarily of phenolic compounds (phenolic acids or isoflavones) conjugated to polar moieties such as amino acid derivatives, sugars, or malic acid. In contrast, isoflavones not conjugated to polar moieties migrated farther up the TLC plates10.
The results of a bioassay of the TLC plate shown in Figure 2A with Clostridium sticklandii, a ruminal hyper ammonia-producing bacterium (HAB), are shown in Figure 3. Adding a 1% (w/v) aqueous solution of tetrazolium red to the agar plates after a 24 hr incubation resulted in a bright red color when living cells were stained. Incubation of band 1 (biochanin A) and part of band 2 (formononetin) on bacteria-seeded agar resulted in a well-defined zone of inhibition (Figure 3A). However, incubation of the remainder of band 2, along with bands 3 and 4, did not inhibit bacterial growth (Figure 3B). These results demonstrated that biochanin A was inhibitory to C. sticklandii growth, but formononetin was not.
Figure 2. Silica thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) separations of extract of Trifolium pratense cv. Kenland, developed in (A) ethyl acetate-hexanes (9:1, v/v), or (B) that same solvent followed by development in ethyl acetate-methanol (78:22, v/v). The distance migrated by the solvent between the origin (OR) and solvent front (SF) is indicated near the brackets between those two boundaries. In Figure 2B, the “impurity front” (IF, location of the impurities moved up the plate by prewashing in polar solvents) is seen as a dark band near the top of the plate. Extracts, prepared from 180-250 mg freeze-dried red clover leaves and stems, were dissolved in methanol, and 10% of extract (A) or 32% (B) was loaded onto silica plates. Standards loaded were formononetin (f, 7.1 nmol), biochanin A (ba, 7.4 nmol), genistein (g, 9.8 nmol), and clovamide (Cl, Figure 2B only, 8.7 nmol). Bands were circled while viewed under a hand-held UV lamp at 254 nm (short-wave UV) and 365 nm (long-wave UV). A digital camera was used to photograph the plate under short-wave UV. The numbers to the right of the clover extract bands in Figure 2A refer to the zones cut out for bioassays. Retention factors (Rf, distance traveled by band/distance traveled by SF) are in parentheses after band numbers in Figure 2A.
Figure 3. Results of TLC plate bioassays of (A) band 1 and the incompletely resolved upper part of band 2 from the TLC plate of Figure 2A, and (B) bands 2-4 from the same TLC plate. Bands were laid face down onto HAB medium inoculated with Clostridium sticklandii and incubated anaerobically 24 hr at 39 °C. At the end of this incubation period, the bands were removed, and the agar plates were stained with an aqueous solution of 1% (w/v) tetrazolium red and photographed under visible light.
This protocol describes a simple method for separating an extract into subsets of compounds and assaying those subsets by contact bioautography. The method is quite similar to one used by Chomnawang et al.15 to screen for plant metabolites inhibitory to gonorrhea-causing bacteria. The type of bioautography employed to screen for antimicrobial plant compounds depends on many factors, including the test microorganism, the laboratory setup, and the preferences of the person(s) performing the bioassay. Contact bioautography, the method used in this study, has been criticized for depending on the ability of a compound to diffuse into inoculated media12. Zones of inhibition over compounds at low concentrations, or with little capability to diffuse into media, may not be detectable if growth occurs in the agar below the diffusate. Also, a zone of inhibition created by one band may spread beyond the band’s initial boundaries, thus possibly masking inhibitory zones created by neighboring compounds14. However, contact bioautography is an easy method to use, and the ability to stack Petri plates minimizes the amount of space needed. In addition, laying TLC bands onto agar eliminates the risk of band dissolution and spreading that can occur when a TLC plate is overlaid with inoculated agar or sprayed with the test microorganism.
Obtaining information from any of the above types of bioautography depends on the chromatographic conditions, test microorganism concentration, and culture/incubation conditions. Chromatographic resolution of antimicrobial bands is not indispensable, but sensitivity may be greater for a well-resolved band6. Bands can be separated by development on longer plates or in multiple solvent systems in one dimension (Figure 2B), or in two dimensions by turning a TLC plate 90 degrees before development in a second solvent16,19. Polar compounds may be difficult to separate on silica without using solvent mixtures that contain acids or bases. These may be lethal to the test microorganism12, although the use of small amounts of acids has been reported14,15. Alternative solvent systems may include water or methanol as components20,21. Polar compounds can also be resolved on different types of TLC plates, such as plates coated with C18 adsorbent or microcrystalline cellulose. However, growth12 or sensitivity to the visualization agent14 may be negatively impacted on some of these adsorbents.
Many different combinations of test microorganism and media can be used for bioautography. However, several factors must be considered when selecting microorganism and media. The media should be tested to determine that there are no components that reduce the tetrazolium salt and cause a nonbiological color change. The agar should also be light enough in color to provide contrast between the stained cells and unstained zones of inhibition. A microorganism that can only grow on the surface of agar can be removed along with the TLC band or washed off during staining. Additionally, the selection of microorganism/medium combination that minimizes gas production will reduce bubbles in the agar. Rumen HAB grow in a carbonate-buffered, carbohydrate-free medium with a mixture of amino acids or peptides as the growth substrate. The agar plates are light gold and transparent. When C. sticklandii is grown in the medium, most of the products are soluble (volatile fatty acids, ammonia). Very little gas is produced, which results in a smooth agar plate with no bubbles.
This bioassay has a couple of potential applications. The size of the zone of inhibition can be used as a rough estimate of the amount of the inhibitory compound, since the radius of the inhibitory zone is proportional to the logarithm of the amount of the compound causing the inhibition17,22. Perhaps the most common use of TLC plate bioassays is to narrow the range of possible antimicrobial compounds in a plant extract. After inhibitory zones are identified by a bioassay, the corresponding regions on a duplicate TLC plate can be eluted with a solvent, such as methanol or ethyl acetate, and analyzed by HPLC with ultraviolet spectroscopy detection to begin characterizing bioactive compounds10,14.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank the late Dr. Norm Taylor, Dept. Plant and Soil Science at the University of Kentucky, for allowing us to use samples from his red clover plots for this study. This project was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture.
Silica F254 TLC plates, aluminum-backed, 0.2 mm thickness, 20 × 20 cm | EMD Chemicals | 5554/7 | These plates are coated with silica that contains an indicator fluorescing at 254 nm. Compounds absorbing at that wavelength appear dark on a fluorescent green background. Alternative sources include Analtech, Selecto Scientific, Fluka. Adsorbents other than silica may be needed. Plastic-backed plates may be suitable, depending on the solvents to be used. |
Sharp, heavy-duty scissors | any sewing supply company | similar to Fiskars 175800-1002 | For cutting TLC plates. A paper cutter with a sharp blade can be used as well. Do not inhale silica dust. |
Drying oven at 100 °C (mechanical convection) | Thermo Scientific | PR305225M | Quincy Lab, Inc, Chicago, IL (www.quincylab.com); Cascade Technical Sciences, Hillsboro, OR (www.cascadetek.com) |
TLC chamber | Kimble Chase | 416180-0000 | Alternative sources: Aldrich. Pyrex beakers or preserving jars can be used for small plates (i.e. 5 × 10 cm). Cover with aluminum foil (jar lids may contain material extractable by solvent vapors). |
50-µL syringe with flat needle tip | Hamilton | 80965 | For loading amounts of standard or sample exceeding 5-10 µL. Alternative sources are equivalent. |
micropipets | Drummond | 2-000-001 | For loading small amounts of standards or samples. Alternative sources: VWR. Also, Pasteur pipets can be stretched to a thinner diameter with a butane torch. |
Filter paper (#1 grade) | Whatman | 1001 917 | Serves as a chamber wick. Other grades of filter paper are OK. This size can be trimmed for the chambers holding 20 × 20 cm plates. |
Beaker tongs | Fisher Scientific | 15-186 | For putting plates in and out of a large TLC chamber. Alternate sources: VWR |
Flat-edge forceps | Fisher Scientific | 10-275 | For putting plates in and out of a small chamber. Alternate sources: VWR |
Small portable UV lamp with 4-Watt or 6-Watt bulbs for short- and long-wave UV light illumination (254 and 365 nm, respectively) | Ultraviolet Products | 95-0271-01 | Alternate sources: Spectronics Corporation (www.spectroline.net) |
Viewing cabinet for use with hand-held UV lamp | Ultraviolet Products | Chromato-Vue C-10E | UV-active bands are more easily circled if plates can be set in here. Alternate sources: Spectronics Corporation. |
Photodocumentation system with overhead UV lamp and visible lamp | Kodak | Gel Logic 200 | Alternate sources: Ultraviolet Products (www.uvp.com). See protocol for homemade alternative. |
Anaerobic Chamber, Type A, Vinyl | Coy | 7150000 | This chamber is appropriate for anaerobic bacteria, like Clostridium sticklandii, as described. However, growth conditions must be tailored to organism used in the assay. A biosafety cabinet and other precautions should be taken if pathogenic organisms are used. Alternate sources: Anaerobe Systems, BioRad, Plas Labs, others |
Tetrazolium red | Sigma-Aldrich | T8877 | Alternate sources: MP Biomedicals, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Alfa Aesar |
Ingredients for HAB media | |||
Pyridoxamine · 2 HCl | Sigma-Aldrich | P9380 | For this and for all the other reagents in this table, alternative sources are equivalent. |
Riboflavin | Sigma-Aldrich | R4500 | |
Thiamine HCl | Sigma-Aldrich | T3902 | |
Nicotinamide | Sigma-Aldrich | N3376 | |
Calcium D-Pantothenate | Sigma-Aldrich | C8731 | |
Lipoic Acid | Sigma-Aldrich | T5625 | |
p-Aminobenzoic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | A9878 | |
Folic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | F8798 | |
Biotin | Sigma-Aldrich | B4639 | |
Cobalamine | Sigma-Aldrich | C3607 | |
Pyridoxal HCl | Sigma-Aldrich | P9130 | |
Pyridoxine | Sigma-Aldrich | P5669 | |
EDTA | Sigma-Aldrich | E6758 | |
Iron sulfate · 7 H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | F8263 | |
Zinc sulfate · 7 H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | Z0251 | |
Manganese chloride · 4 H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | M8054 | |
Boric acid | Sigma-Aldrich | B6768 | |
Cobalt chloride · 6 H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | C8661 | |
Copper chloride · 2 H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | 459097 | |
Nickel chloride · 6 H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | 203866 | |
Sodium molybdate · 2 H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | 331058 | |
Trypticase (Pancreatic digest of casein) | Thermo Fisher | B11921 | |
Potassium phosphate monobasic anhydrous | Thermo Fisher | P284 | |
sodium carbonate · H2O | Thermo Fisher | S636 | |
Agar | Thermo Fisher | 50841063 | |
Magnesium sulfate · 6 H2O | Thermo Fisher | 7791-18-6 | |
Calcium chloride · 2 H2O | Thermo Fisher | BP510 | |
Cysteine HCl | Thermo Fisher | 19464780 | |
Potassium phosphate dibasic anhydrous | Thermo Fisher | P290 | |
Sodium chloride | Thermo Fisher | BP358 |