We introduce an efficient method to retrograde label retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in adult zebrafish.
As retrograde labeling retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) can isolate RGCs somata from dying sites, it has become the gold standard for counting RGCs in RGCs survival and regeneration experiments. Many studies have been performed in mammalian animals to research RGCs survival after optic nerve injury. However, retrograde labeling of RGCs in adult zebrafish has not yet been reported, though some alternative methods can count cell numbers in retinal ganglion cell layers (RGCL). Considering the small size of the adult zebrafish skull and the high risk of death after drilling on the skull, we open the skull with the help of acid-etching and seal the hole with a light curing bond, which could significantly improve the survival rate. After absorbing the dyes for 5 days, almost all the RGCs are labeled. As this method does not need to transect the optic nerve, it is irreplaceable in the research of RGCs survival after optic nerve crush in adult zebrafish. Here, we introduce this method step by step and provide representative results.
As adult zebrafish have a strong ability to regenerate axons after optic nerve injury1, a proper method to count the whole RGCs is essential to evaluate RGCs survival and regeneration2. Based on the methods of retrograde labeling RGCs in mammalian and goldfish3-5, we constructed the method to label RGCs from the tectum in adult zebrafish. For adult zebrafish, two critical technical concerns should be noted: the skull of adult zebrafish is very small6; they live in a water environment. Here, we treat the skull with etchant which minimizes the hazards associated with drilling5. Then, we seal the hole with light curing bond which improves animal survival after surgery.
Previously, several other techniques were adopted to count RGCs number in indirect ways. HE staining in the retina sections labels all types of cells in the RGCL7. Antibody labeling in the whole retina, such as islet-1, can also label amacrine cells8. Though retrograde label from the optic nerve stump can label all RGCs in the retina, it cannot be adopted in the crush model because it causes extra injury to the optic nerve. Taking advantage of retrograde label from the tectum, we have researched RGCs survival and regeneration in optic nerve crush. Results show that almost all RGCs survived and over 90% of RGCs regenerated to the tectum at the first week in the crush model9.
In order to successfully label all RGCs, DiI paste was chosen after comparison with several other commercial dyes10. Firstly, it is especially designed for in vivo tissue labeling. Secondly, it is a lipophilic dye which cannot diffuse in water. Additionally, this fluorescence can persist for a long time which makes it an excellent candidate for RGCs survival research.
1. Construct the Surgery Apparatus
NOTE: To ensure the fish remains alive during and after the operation, drip anesthesia solution ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (MS-222, or Tricaine) at a half concentration (0.015%) with a velocity of 1 drop/sec through the fish's mouth using a homebuilt drip system shown in Figure 1.
2. Retrograde Label RGCs from the Right Tectum
NOTE: Prior to beginning, disinfect all apparatuses with 70-75% ethanol, ensuring that no ethanol remains.
3. Wholemounting Retina and Imaging
As Figures 4B-D show, the number of DiI+ cells is two thirds of DAPI+ cells in RGCL. In a normal retina, a montage image of a whole retina (Figure 4E) shows that DiI+ RGCs are distributed over the entire retina but in a regenerated retina (Figure 4F), as RGCs in the central area have not regenerated to their target at the first week, they could not be labeled.
Figure 1. The surgery apparatus used for retrograde labeling of RGC. (A) Use a sponge (a) to fix the fish. The operating platform (length is 28 cm, width is 10 cm, height is 5 cm) and infusion tube are connected via a metal needle (b). Excess water is stored in the cavity (c). (B) A close-up for the metal needle. The needle’s head is wrapped with light curing bond (d). (C) Reservoirs are used for storing MS-222 (e, length is 6 cm, width is 10 cm, height is 8 cm) and saline (f, length is 4 cm, width is 10 cm, height is 8 cm), respectively. The infusion tube (g) connects the reservoir and the metal needle.
Figure 2. Dorsal view of the skull of adult zebrafish. (A) Intact skull before rossing. The yellow dotted line marks the tectum; the red dotted line marks the telencephalon; and the green dotted line marks the cerebellum. (B) Skull after skin removed. (C) After corrosion with etchant, the skull is malacic and a concave area is pointed out by forceps (white *). (D) Right tectum is exposed after the skull is removed. Scale is 500 μm.
Figure 3. Key steps of wholemounting retina. (A) Homebuilt glass spoon for scooping retina, bottom image shows the whole view. (B) Hold the retina with the “spoon” (marked by dotted line). (C) Transport the retina into ice-cold 30% glycerin. (D) Cut the retina into 4 quarters; arrow indicates the orientation of cutting. Scale bars (A) 1 mm; (B-D) 500 μm.
Figure 4. The sampling of RGCs counting in virtual retina. (A) Schematic view of the retina has four fields (N, D, V, T field) and each of them has three fields which are shown in a white box. Notice the optic disc is usually located at the ventral-temporal orientation (black dot). (B) DiI labeled RGCs. (C) DAPI labeled nucleus. (D) Merged picture of RGCs and nucleus. (E) Montage image of whole retina in normal zebrafish. (F) Montage image showing regenerated retina after optic nerve injury. The central area of the retina is not labeled as RGCs have not regenerated to their targets at the first week. Abbreviations: N=nasal, D=dorsal, V=ventral, T=temporal. Scale bars: 30 μm (B-D); 500 μm (E, F).
Retrograde labeling of RGCs is important to research RGCs survival in mammalian animals, but it has not been used in zebrafish. The alternative methods, HE staining7 and antibody staining8, are not gold standards for counting RGCs number, and transgenic lines with all RGCs labeled has not yet been constructed12,13. In this video, we introduce a method to retrograde label RGCs in the retina of adult zebrafish. Though about 1% of axons project to olfactory bulb or other areas14, this method can label almost all RGCs in the retina.
As zebrafish are too fragile to bear the physical injury, opening the skull of adult zebrafish with scalpel incision3 or a drill5,15 may cause death. Softening the skull with etchant can minimize the damage to the brain. By sealing the hole with a light curing bond and fixing it under blue light, most fish survive after surgery. It only takes 12-15 min to perform the surgery under proficient operation, which is more convenient and efficient compared with rat and other mammalian animals5.
DiI tissue-labeling paste is a lipophilic dye. Compared to DiI crystals or microinjection of concentrated solutions, this improves the penetration of the dye into the tissue, labeling axons both on and below the surface. Additionally, the fluorescence can persist for a long time period10. On the other hand, this dye is absorbed by passive transport pathway, so it is necessary to leave the dye in the tectum for at least 5 days for complete labeling.
The zebrafish is an excellent model organism of visual regeneration. At 7 days after optic nerve crush, almost all RGCs axon regenerate to the tectum, but only half of RGCs regenerate in the optic nerve cut model9. This method is an ideal way to research RGCs survival and regeneration after optic nerve crush, which could avoid extra injury on the optic nerve.
We have presented a full protocol for successfully retrograde labeling RGCs in adult zebrafish and measuring the RGCs number in a wholemount retina. Additionally, by using a light curing bond, we increase the survival rate of zebrafish, which make this method more effective.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This is supported by 973 MOST grant (Grant No. 2011CB504402, 2012CB947602), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91132724, U1332136) and the ‘Hundred Talents Project’ of Chinese Academy of Science. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the USTC (Permit Number: USTCACUC1103013).
MS222 | Sigma Aldrich | E10521 | ABD |
DiI | Invitrogen | N22880 | ABD |
lightcuring bond | Heraeus Kulzer | Durafill bond | Germany |
Gluma Etch | Heraeus Kulzer | Gluma Etch 35 Gel | Germany |
Blue LED | Shenruo Medical Equipment Co. | Power Blue Light Curing Unit | China |