The practical equivalent circuits of single-phase two-winding transformers exhibit significant deviations from their idealized versions due to the inherent properties of winding resistance and finite core permeability. These properties result in real and reactive power losses, affecting the transformer's performance. Understanding these deviations is crucial for designing more efficient transformers.
In a practical transformer, each winding exhibits resistance and leakage reactance. The winding resistance contributes to resistive losses, manifesting as heat, while the leakage reactance, associated with the leakage flux, causes a voltage drop and results in reactive power loss. These elements are modeled in series, with each winding in the transformer's equivalent circuit, providing a more accurate representation of the transformer's behavior under load conditions.
The finite permeability of the transformer's core implies that a non-zero magnetomotive force (MMF) is required, as described by Ohm's law for magnetic circuits. This requirement results in a magnetizing current, which is essential for establishing the magnetic flux in the core. When the induced voltage across the primary winding is considered, the magnetizing current lags the induced voltage by 90 degrees. This relationship is represented by a shunt inductor in the equivalent circuit, accurately modeling the reactive power component due to core magnetization.
Core losses, primarily due to hysteresis and eddy currents within the core material, are represented by a shunt resistor in the equivalent circuit. This resistor models the core loss current, which is in phase with the induced voltage. When the secondary winding current is zero, the primary current comprises two components: the magnetizing current and the core loss current. These components are responsible for the reactive and real power losses, respectively.
To reduce these losses, high-grade alloy steel is often used for the core material. This material has superior magnetic properties, reducing hysteresis and eddy current losses, thereby improving transformer efficiency.
Three primary alternative equivalent circuits can be constructed for a practical transformer:
Each of these equivalent circuits provides insights into different aspects of transformer performance and simplifies analysis for specific applications. By understanding and modeling these non-ideal characteristics, engineers can design transformers that better meet the demands of various electrical systems.
