Summary

Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques

Published: March 12, 2019
doi:

Summary

The technique described herein offers a low cost and relatively simple method to simultaneously measure particle kinematics and turbulence in flows with low particle concentrations. The turbulence is measured using particle image velocimetry (PIV), and particle kinematics are calculated from images obtained with a high-speed camera in an overlapping field-of-view.

Abstract

Numerous problems in scientific and engineering fields involve understanding the kinematics of particles in turbulent flows, such as contaminants, marine micro-organisms, and/or sediments in the ocean, or fluidized bed reactors and combustion processes in engineered systems. In order to study the effect of turbulence on the kinematics of particles in such flows, simultaneous measurements of both the flow and particle kinematics are required. Non-intrusive, optical flow measurement techniques for measuring turbulence, or for tracking particles, exist but measuring both simultaneously can be challenging due to interference between the techniques. The method presented herein provides a low cost and relatively simple method to make simultaneous measurements of the flow and particle kinematics. A cross section of the flow is measured using a particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique, which provides two components of velocity in the measurement plane. This technique utilizes a pulsed-laser for illumination of the seeded flow field that is imaged by a digital camera. The particle kinematics are simultaneously imaged using a light emitting diode (LED) line light that illuminates a planar cross section of the flow that overlaps with the PIV field-of-view (FOV). The line light is of low enough power that it does not affect the PIV measurements, but powerful enough to illuminate the larger particles of interest imaged using the high-speed camera. High-speed images that contain the laser pulses from the PIV technique are easily filtered by examining the summed intensity level of each high-speed image. By making the frame rate of the high-speed camera incommensurate with that of the PIV camera frame rate, the number of contaminated frames in the high-speed time series can be minimized. The technique is suitable for mean flows that are predominantly two-dimensional, contain particles that are at least 5 times the mean diameter of the PIV seeding tracers, and are low in concentration.

Introduction

There exist a large number of applications in both scientific and engineering fields that involve the behavior of particles in turbulent flows, for example, aerosols in the atmosphere, contaminants and/or sediments in engineered systems, and marine micro-organisms or sediment in the ocean1,2,3. In such applications, it is often of interest to understand how the particles respond to turbulence, which requires simultaneous measurement of the particle kinematics and the fluid dynamics.

Existing technologies to measure particle motions, called particle tracking (PT), which tracks individual particle trajectories, and the statistical technique of particle image velocimetry4,5 (PIV), used to measure flow velocities, both incorporate non-intrusive optical techniques. The main challenge in using these non-intrusive optical techniques to measure both the flow and particle kinematics simultaneously is the separate illumination required for each imaging technique that cannot interfere with the other's measurement accuracy (e.g., the illumination source for measuring the particle kinematics cannot act as a significant noise source in the fluid velocity measurement and vice-versa). The image contrast in both sets of images needs to be sufficient to obtain reliable results. For example, the PT images are converted to black and white images in order to perform a blob analysis to determine particle positions; thus, insufficient contrast leads to errors in particle position. Poor contrast in PIV images amounts to a low signal-to-noise ratio that will cause inaccuracies in estimation of the fluid velocities.

Here, a relatively low cost and simple method to simultaneously measure both particle kinematics and flow velocities is described. Through use of a high-power monochromatic light emitting diode (LED) line light, where the line refers to the light aperture, and dual-head high-intensity laser, both the particles of interest and the flow field are imaged in the same region simultaneously. The high power of the LED is sufficient for the imaging of the (tracked) particles by the high-speed camera but does not impact the PIV images because the light intensity scattered from PIV tracers is too low. When the dual-head high-intensity laser illuminates the flow field for the PIV images, it occurs over a short time interval and these images are easily identified and removed from the time series obtained by the high-speed PT camera when they are registered. PIV laser pulses recorded in the high-speed image (used for particle tracking) time series can be minimized by not running the two systems at frame acquisition rates that are commensurate with each other. In more advanced setups, one could externally trigger the PT and PIV cameras with a delay that would ensure this does not happen. Finally, by careful consideration of the amount of particles being tracked within the PIV field of view (FOV), any errors introduced by these tracked particles in the correlation analysis of PIV images are already taken into account by the overall error estimation, including errors associated with non-uniform size distribution of PIV tracers within the interrogation window. The vast majority of the PIV seeding tracers are following the flow, yielding accurate flow velocity estimates. These techniques enable the simultaneous direct measurement of both the particle kinematics and flow field in a two-dimensional plane.

This technique is demonstrated by applying it to determine particle settling characteristics in a turbulent flow, similar to that used in studies by Yang and Shy6 and Jacobs et al.7. Particle settling is the final stage in sediment transport, which generally consists of sediment suspension, transport, and settling. In most prior studies that have addressed particle settling in turbulent flows, either particle trajectories or turbulent velocities are not directly measured but inferred theoretically or modeled8,9,10. Details on the interactions between particles and turbulence have most often been investigated using theoretical and numerical models due to the experimental limitations in measuring both simultaneously6,11. We present a particle-turbulence interaction case study in an oscillating grid facility, where we study the settling velocity of particles and their coupling with turbulence. For clarity, hereafter we will refer to the particles under investigation as "particles" and the seeding particles used for the PIV technique as "tracers"; additionally, we will refer to the camera used for the high-speed imaging of the particle trajectories as the "particle tracking", "PT", or "high-speed" camera, which measures "high-speed images" and the camera used for the PIV method the "PIV camera", which measures "images". The method described herein enables the simultaneous measurement of particles kinematics and fluid dynamics over a pre-defined field of interest within the facility. The obtained data provides a two-dimensional description of the particle-turbulence interaction.

Protocol

Note: All personnel should be trained in the safe use and operation of Class IV lasers as well as in the safe use and operation of hand and power tools. 1. Experimental Set-up PIV setup Set up the dual-head laser and optics. Place the laser on an optical plate. Level the laser with respect to the bottom of the facility (or with respect to the ground if it is desired to have vertical velocities aligned with gravitational acceleration) and v…

Representative Results

A schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The figure shows the arrangement of light sheets (LED and laser), the overlap in the FOVs, and the position of the FOVs relative to the oscillating grid and tank walls. The turbulence and particles are measured simultaneously as described in the protocol section. Figure 2 shows example results of the measurements of instantaneous velocity and vorticity along with sample …

Discussion

The method described herein is relatively inexpensive and provides a simple way to simultaneously measure particle trajectories and turbulence in order to examine the influence of flow on particle kinematics. It is noteworthy to mention that flows or particle motions that are strongly three-dimensional are not well-suited for this technique. The out-of-plane motion will result in errors17 in both the 2D tracking and the PIV analysis and should be minimized. In addition, the method requires the con…

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Portions of this work were supported by the II-VI Foundation and the Coastal Carolina Professional Enhancement Grant. We would also like to acknowledge Corrine Jacobs, Marek Jendrassak and William Merchant for help with the experimental setup.

Materials

Optical lenses CVI LASER OPTICS Y2-1025-45, RCC-25.0-15.0-12.7-C, PLCC-25.4-515.1-UV Other optics companies are acceptable. Spherical and cyclindrical lenses for generating PIV light sheet.
Camera lens for PIV Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2D Other camera lens companies are acceptable. Camera lens for PIV imaging.
Camera lens for high-speed Nikon Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D Other camera lens companies are acceptable. Camera lens for high-speed imaging.
Dual-head pulsed laser Quantel EverGreen: 532nm, 70mJ@15Hz Other laser companies are acceptable. Dual-head Pulsed-laser for PIV: Nd:YAG
LED line light Gardasoft Vision, Ltd. VLX2 LED Line Lighting – Green – GAR-VLX2-250-LWD-G-T04 Other companies are acceptable. Line light for LED.
PIV seeding particles/tracers Potters Industries SPHERICAL Hollow Glass Spheres: 11 mm average diameter Other companies are acceptable. PIV seeding particles
CCD cross-correlation camera TSI, Inc. POWERVIEW 11M: CCD, Double-exposure, 4008×2672 pixels @ 4.2 Hz with 12bit dynmic range Other companies are acceptable. Double-exposurem, CCD camera for PIV imaging.
High-speed camera Photron FASTCAM SA3; Model 60K: 1024×1024 pixels @ 1kHz Other companies are acceptable. CMOS camera for high speed imaging.
Synchronizer TSI, Inc. LASERPULSE SYNCHRONIZER 610036 Other companies are acceptable. Synchronize the acquisition of the PIV camera and laser.
Calibration target TSI, Inc. Other companies are acceptable. Precision target for image calibration.

References

  1. Maxey, M. R. The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 174, 441-465 (1987).
  2. Good, G. H., Ireland, P. J., Bewley, G. P., Bodenschatz, E., Collins, L. R., Warhaft, Z. Settling regimes of inertial particles in isotropic turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 759, R3 (2014).
  3. Ha, H. K., Maa, J. P. Y. Effects of suspended sediment concentration and turbulence on settling velocity of cohesive sediment. Geosciences Journal. 14 (2), 163-171 (2010).
  4. Raffel, M., Willert, C. E., Wereley, S. T., Kompenhans, J. . Particle image velocimetry: A practical guide. , (2007).
  5. Lu, L., Sick, V. High-speed particle image velocimetry near surfaces. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 76, e50559 (2013).
  6. Yang, T. S., Shy, S. S. The settling velocity of heavy particles in an aqueous near-isotropic turbulence. Physics of Fluids. 15 (4), 868-880 (2003).
  7. Jacobs, C. N., Merchant, W., Jendrassak, M., Limpasuvan, V., Gurka, R., Hackett, E. E. Flow scales of influence on the settling velocities of particles with varying characteristics. PLoS One. 11 (8), 0159645 (2016).
  8. Murray, S. P. Settling velocities and vertical diffusion of particles in turbulent water. Journal of Geophysical Research. 75 (9), 1647-1654 (1970).
  9. Nielsen, P. Turbulence effects on the settling of suspended particles. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 63 (5), 835-838 (1993).
  10. Kawanisi, K., Shiozaki, R. Turbulent effects on the settling velocity of suspended sediment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 134 (2), 261-266 (2008).
  11. Maxey, M. R., Corrsin, S. Gravitational settling of aerosol particles in randomly oriented cellular flow fields. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences. 43, 1112-1134 (1986).
  12. Melling, A. Tracer particles and seeding for particle image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology. 8 (12), 1406-1416 (1997).
  13. Hadad, T., Gurka, R. Effects of particle size, concentration and surface coating on turbulent flow properties obtained using PIV/PTV. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 45, 203-212 (2013).
  14. Adrian, R. J. Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 23 (1), 261-304 (1991).
  15. Shy, S. S., Tang, C. Y., Fann, S. Y. A nearly isotropic turbulence generated by a pair of vibrating grids. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 14 (3), 251-262 (1997).
  16. Dietrich, W. E. Settling velocity of natural particles. Water Resources Research. 18 (6), 1615-1626 (1982).
  17. Huang, H., Dabiri, D., Gharib, M. On errors of digital particle image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology. 8 (12), 1427 (1997).

Play Video

Cite This Article
Hackett, E. E., Gurka, R. Simultaneous Measurement of Turbulence and Particle Kinematics Using Flow Imaging Techniques. J. Vis. Exp. (145), e58036, doi:10.3791/58036 (2019).

View Video