The present protocol describes the intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of adult zebrafish with neurotoxic 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) at the ventral diencephalon (Dn) and the assessment of the impairment and subsequent recovery of swimming behavior postlesion by using the open tank test, which is accompanied by analysis using a video tracking software.
The limitations of current treatments in delaying dopaminergic neuronal loss in Parkinson's disease (PD) raise the need for alternative therapies that can restore these neurons. Much effort is currently directed toward a better understanding of neuroregeneration using preclinical in vivo models. This regenerative capability for self-repair is, however, inefficient in mammals. Non-mammalian animals like zebrafish have thus emerged as an excellent neuroregenerative model due to its capability to continuously self-renew and have a close brain homology to humans. As part of the effort in elucidating cellular events involved in neuroregeneration in vivo, we have established the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced adult zebrafish-based PD model. This was achieved through the optimized intracerebroventricular (ICV) microinjection of 99.96 mM 6-OHDA to specifically ablate dopaminergic neurons (DpN) in the ventral diencephalon (Dn) of zebrafish brain. Immunofluorescence indicated more than 85% of DpN ablation at day three postlesion and full restoration of DpN at lesioned site 30 days postlesion. The present study determined the impairment and subsequent recovery of zebrafish swimming behavior following lesion by using the open field test through which two parameters, distance traveled (cm) and mean speed (cm/s), were quantified. The locomotion was assessed by analyzing the recordings of individual fish of each group (n = 6) using video tracking software. The findings showed a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in speed (cm/s) and distance traveled (cm) of lesioned zebrafish 3 days postlesion when compared to sham. The lesioned zebrafish exhibited full recovery of swimming behavior 30 days postlesion. The present findings suggest that 6-OHDA lesioned adult zebrafish is an excellent model with reproducible quality to facilitate the study of neuroregeneration in PD. Future studies on the mechanisms underlying neuroregeneration as well as intrinsic and extrinsic factors that modulate the process may provide important insight into new cell replacement treatment strategies against PD.
Parkinson's disease (PD), a disease distinctively characterized by muscle rigidity, resting tremor, and bradykinesia, is the fastest growing neurological disease in the world1,2. The risk and prevalence of PD increase rapidly with age especially in individuals aged 50 years and above3. The etiology and pathogenesis of PD hitherto remain poorly understood. This has often left the early-onset of PD undiagnosed. At present, the lack of dopamine and the loss of dopaminergic neurons (DpN) in PD patients are strongly linked to the manifestation of motor symptoms4. Capitalizing on this relationship, several treatments have been designed either to act directly as dopamine replacement (i.e., levodopa) or to compensate for the loss of DpN (i.e., deep brain stimulation). Although these treatments bring about symptomatic benefits, they do not modify the deteriorating course of the disease5. In view of this significant weakness, cell replacement therapy has been proposed. The efficacy of this approach is, however, inconsistent given the challenges of graft preparation, cell growth control, and phenotype instability. Cell replacement therapy, which had raised ethical concerns, also poses the risk of inducing brain tumors and unwanted immune reactions6,7.
The limitations of current therapeutic strategies have led to a greater emphasis on the regeneration of DpN as a potential approach in treating PD. Regeneration of DpN or neuroregeneration has emerged as one of the promising breakthroughs in the management of PD, not only due to its potential as a new therapeutic method but also as means to understand the mechanism of the disease8,9. This approach focuses on the restoration of neuronal function through differentiation, migration, and integration of existing progenitor cells into the lesioned circuitry10. In order to further explore neuroregeneration, various in vivo studies have been undertaken. It was found that vertebrates such as mammals, amphibians, and reptiles generate new brain cells following injury11,12. Among the vertebrates, mammalian animals are more sought after given their genetic resemblance to human beings. Mammals, however, exhibit limited and poor reparative capacity in the central nervous system (CNS) that can last through adulthood following a brain lesion13. In general, mammals are unsuited as animal models for understanding neuroregeneration given that the low number of neurons produced will not be sufficient to restore damaged neural circuits observed in PD. As such, the teleost-based model, specifically in zebrafish, is greatly favored for its high proliferative rate, capability to continuously self-renew, and close brain homology with humans14,15.
Zebrafish is most commonly used to study disordered movement in PD16. The zebrafish-based PD model is usually induced by neurotoxins, which include 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)17. Although effective in inducing specific loss of DpN and decrease of dopamine levels, MPTP-based models do not closely mimic the conditions of PD as the DpN loss is not restricted solely to the CNS18. The inability of 6-OHDA to cross the blood-brain barrier restricted its effects on cellular and functional changes within the brain when it is administered intracranially as opposed to intramuscularly19. Peripheral administration of 6-OHDA caused a global reduction of dopamine levels throughout the nervous system20. While administration of 6-OHDA into the cerebrospinal fluid caused ablation of DpN throughout the CNS21, which does not mimic the condition as seen in PD whereby the loss of DpN occurs specifically at the substantia nigra of the human brain. ICV administration of 6-OHDA, on the contrary, specifically induced significant ablation of DpN in the area of ventral Dn in the zebrafish brain, which closely resembled substantia nigra22. Interestingly, recovery of DpN was reported 30 days post 6-OHDA-induced lesion and these neurons survived over the course of life23,24. The functional recovery of DpN was demonstrated through a locomotor assessment of distance traveled (cm) and mean speed (cm/s) using the 6-OHDA-induced adult zebrafish-based PD model22.
The present study has been approved by the Committee on Animal Research and Ethics (CARE), Universiti Technologi MARA (UiTM) [Reference No: UiTM CARE 346/2021, dated 7 May 2021].
NOTE: The published protocols22,25,26 for standard husbandry and maintenance of the 6-OHDA-lesioned adult zebrafish PD model were utilized. Experiments were conducted with adult male zebrafish (Danio rerio) aged more than five months old with a standardized length of 3.2-3.7 cm.
1. Zebrafish maintenance and pre-ICV microinjection preparations
2. Anaesthetisation and ICV injection of zebrafish
Figure 1: Injection site of neurotoxin, 6-OHDA. (A) The point of microcapillary entry is guided by the intersection between the metopic suture (MS), coronal suture (CS), and sagittal suture (SS) that connects the frontal and parietal skull of the zebrafish brain (plan view). (B) A schematic drawing (plan view) of the zebrafish skull and brain shows the microcapillary, which is lowered directly above the habenula (Hab), and its point of entry at the intersection between hemispheres. (C) A schematic drawing (sagittal section) of the zebrafish brain shows the angle of injection and depth of penetration. The black dot represents the lesioned site that is situated above the targeted area, the ventral diencephalon. Abbreviations: 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxydopamine, CS: coronal suture, Dn: diencephalon, Hab: habenula, Hyp: hypothalamus, MS: metopic suture, OB: olfactory bulb, POA: preoptic area, PT: posterior tuberculum, SS: sagittal suture, Tec: tectum, and Tel: telencephalon. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Locomotor assessment
NOTE: Locomotor assessment of zebrafish (n = six / group; sham vs lesioned) was assessed individually via the open tank test using established protocols28,29 at day three and day 30 post-6-OHDA lesion.
Figure 2: Experimental setup of an open tank test for assessment of zebrafish locomotor behavior. (A) The experimental tank (front view) is placed on a raised platform that is illuminated from below. The four walls of the tank are covered with white paper and the recordings are captured axially. The temperature is measured using a thermometer and regulated at 28 ± 1.0 °C using a commercial aquarium heater. (B) Screenshot (plan view) of video recording that is captured using the setup. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The present experiment assessed the changes in adult zebrafish swimming behavior following ICV microinjection with 6-OHDA. The reason for using 6-OHDA as the neurotoxin of choice was due to its inability to cross the blood-brain barrier, which produced specific and targeted ablation of DpN in the area of interest-ventral diencephalon (Dn)16. The DpN subpopulation here holds anatomical resemblance to the DpN subpopulation in the human's substantia nigra pars compacta31.
As per our previous work22, the cellular effect of 6-OHDA ICV microinjection against DpN of adult zebrafish was confirmed through immunohistostaining of DpN marker-tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). The main brain region of interest was the Dn, made up of the preoptic area (POA), posterior tuberculum (PT), and hypothalamus (Hyp). It was found that 99.96 mM 6-OHDA resulted in a 100% survival rate of the adult zebrafish with the lowest number of TH-immunoreactive (TH-ir) in Dn. It was also found that more than 85% (p < 0.01) of TH-ir DpN in the Dn was ablated on day three postlesion. The number of TH-ir DpN then increased by more than 50% at day 14 postlesion before achieving full regeneration 30 days postlesion (Figure 3). This data supports the regenerative capabilities of DpN subpopulation in Dn of adult zebrafish following ablation32.
Figure 3: Regeneration of DpN in the Dn region of zebrafish lesioned by 99.96 mM 6-OHDA. (A) The number of TH-ir DpN in three main areas of the Dn region, POA, PT, and Hyp, over four data points: sham, 3, 14, and 30 days post-lesioning by 99.96 mM 6-OHDA neurotoxin. Each bar represents mean ± SD of n = 6 independent experiments; *p < 0.05. (B) Representative confocal microscope images of sagittally sectioned zebrafish brain of sham (I, I', and I''), 3 days post-lesioning (II, II', and II''), 14 days post-lesioning (III, III', and III''), and 30 days post-lesioning (IV, IV', and IV'') stained with TH (DpN; green) and DAPI (nuclei; blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. Abbreviations- DAPI: 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxydopamine, Dn: diencephalon, DpN: dopaminergic neurons, Hyp: hypothalamus, POA: preoptic area, PT: posterior tuberculum, SD: standard deviation, and TH-ir: tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive. Adapted from Vijayanathan et al.22. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
We then performed locomotor assessment using the open tank test to investigate changes in distance traveled (cm) and mean speed (cm/s) of adult zebrafish following ICV microinjection of 6-OHDA and sham. Experimental fish were then assessed on day three postlesion (least number of TH-ir DpN observed) and day 30 postlesion (fully restored DpN reported at lesion site). Analysis of zebrafish swimming behavior using a video tracking software indicated that both the mean speed (cm/s) and distance traveled (cm) of the lesioned group on day three postlesion were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) to <45% when compared to sham (Figure 4). The lesioned group exhibited recovery of motor function 30 days postlesion with no significant difference of both the mean speed (cm/s) and distance traveled (cm) when compared to sham.
Figure 4: Changes in swimming behavior following intracerebroventricular injection by 6-OHDA. Swimming behavior of adult zebrafish was assessed before lesioning, on day three and day 30 postlesion by 99.96 mM 6-OHDA. Parameters that were assessed included: (A) mean speed (cm/s) and (B) distance traveled (cm). Each bar represents mean ± SD of six fish; ****p < 0.0001 (Student t-test). Abbreviations: 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxydopamine, SD: standard deviation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The present work successfully demonstrated the locomotor assessment of the established 6-OHDA-induced, adult zebrafish-based PD model. The entire experiment involved three major steps: pre-ICV microinjection preparations, ICV microinjection of zebrafish, and locomotor assessment. To ensure the healthy recovery of adult zebrafish following the ICV microinjection procedure and good experimental outcome, some good practices for each step have been recommended in the present study.
Pre-ICV microinjection preparation: Animal selection was best performed the day before the experiment. The gender was identified and the length of the fish was measured. Male adult zebrafish with a standardized length of 3.2-3.7 cm were placed in a separate experimental tank. Additionally, the fish should undergo 24 h fasting period to avoid regurgitation during anaesthesia33. A fish tank (with its four walls covered with white paper) with a standing water tank set up should be prepared before the experiment to lessen the exterior stress and help the recovery process of the zebrafish. All chemicals were prepared fresh before the start of each experiment as they could deteriorate rapidly over time and become unstable at room temperature34,35.
Microinjection of 6-OHDA:Clean and gentle handling of zebrafish should be performed throughout the process to prevent the introduction of unnecessary injury and infection to the fish. The fish should be placed on top of a wet sponge and kept in a moist condition to avoid drying out36. A small incision was made using a sterile needle with firm and appropriate force to avoid extra pressure that may crack the zebrafish skull. This incision should allow entry of the microcapillary into the brain cavity. The microcapillary was then lowered until a depth of 1,200 µm from the entry point, which is in between two hemispheres-the telencephalon and tectum (Figure 1B,C). The entry point was chosen between these hemispheres to prevent any additional laceration of neurons37. This technique involved the use of a microinjector, the pressure and timing of the delivery should be calibrated to ensure delivery of 0.5 µL of neurotoxin. This calibration can be performed by measuring the size of the droplet formed on the filter paper38. Our practice usually involved the following set up of programmable parameters whereby the intensity of injection was lowered with each subsequent injection (injection pressure: 4000 hPa, duration of injection: 0.3 s, and compensation pressure: 10 hPa). In order to avoid the neurotoxin from leaking out of the brain cavity, a 20 s interval was applied between injection and withdrawal of the microcapillary35. Due to the small size of the capillary, the microcapillary may be blocked after each injection. As such, the microcapillary should be essentially flushed prior to the next injection so as to clear the blockage and ensure that the intensity of injection is sufficient to yield the desired volume of 0.5 µL of 6-OHDA. The fish would then be transferred into a recovery tank maintained at 28 ± 1.0 °C. If the fish fails to recover within 30 s, flush out its gill and mouth with distilled water until full recovery of muscle movements occurs.
Locomotor Assessment: To ensure good locomotor assessment on 6-OHDA-induced adult zebrafish, the behavioral study should be conducted within the same time frame for each time point. Each behavioral study should allow for a minimum of 2 min acclimatization period and should be performed within 4 h39. The present experiment was carried out in the early morning between 8 am to 12 pm as zebrafish were more active during this period40. A longer acclimatization period is necessary if zebrafish show any abnormal behavior with clear signs of stress and anxiety (freezing and erratic behavior)41. However, to avoid inconsistency in the swimming behavior of the earlier and the last batch of recordings, the acclimatization should not exceed 10 min30. For the open field test, an experimental tank of any size, color, shape, and texture could be used for recordings that range from a minimum of 5 to 30 min42,43. Zebrafish behavior is greatly influenced by the temperature of its surroundings. Small fluctuations of more than 4 °C could greatly impact the swimming speed44. Hence, the temperature of water in the experimental tank should be strictly maintained under a controlled temperature of 28 ± 1.0 °C using a commercial heater, and the water level was kept around 12 cm deep throughout the experiment. The walls of the tank were covered with white paper to create contrast between the test subject and experimental arena as well as to reduce external stimuli that may cause an unprompted reaction from test subjects45. The fish from each group were tested individually in accordance with the current standard practice for zebrafish neurobehavioural research23,37,46. Given the zebrafish propensity to social interactions, there is concern that isolation during the testing period might impact their behavior47. However, the current experimental setup was limited to a maximum of 10 min per trial and this short period of isolation was found to not have any effect on the locomotor activity of adult zebrafish48. In order to provide accurate data collection for the behavioral study, the assessment was performed by randomly selecting the zebrafish from different experimental groups (i.e., alternating two zebrafish from either the sham and 6-OHDA lesioned group until n = 6) during the open tank test49. The recorded videos were analyzed using a video tracking system that is commonly used for rodents' behavioral tracking. As zebrafish is an emerging animal model, the behavioral tests conducted using zebrafish are usually adapted from the established scientific literature on rodents50. Here, we demonstrated the ability of the video tracking software to automatically track zebrafish in the experimental arena and effectively compute the desired parameters. The video tracking software stood out from the other available software due to the variety of video files supported by the software, regular update package releases, and support provided for different operating systems51.
One of the limitations of existing animal-based PD models is the lack of mechanistic similarities that mimic the motor impairment as observed after dopaminergic neuronal loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta of the human brain52. The emergence of the adult zebrafish-based PD model may, however, address this particular limitation. As observed in the present study, the reduced swimming speed corresponded to our previous cellular findings whereby more than 85% dopaminergic neuronal loss in the ventral diencephalon of 6-OHDA-induced adult zebrafish model three days postlesion22. It appears that specific ablation of dopaminergic neurons in this area of interest is required to disrupt the descending motor signaling from the brain, causing slowness in movement53. L. J. Caldwell, et al.23 who performed ICV injection of 6-OHDA at the optic tectum (point of entry), for instance, observed only changes in zebrafish shoaling and mating behavior. Ablation of DpN in ventral Dn is crucial as the population of DpN in the Dn of adult zebrafish acts as the only dopamine source for zebrafish motor neurons. This is analogous to the human substantia nigra54. The present study also observed faster-swimming speed and longer distance traveled by lesioned zebrafish in later postlesion time points, indicating continued and ultimately full restoration of dopamine signaling that governs zebrafish swimming behavior. These findings thus validated the capability of newly regenerated dopaminergic neurons in regaining their functional activities in lesioned adult zebrafish.
The current application route of 6-OHDA involved a slightly invasive injection paradigm that required insertion of microcapillary deep into the brain, toward the lesion area of ventral Dn. This method is slightly laborious in comparison to peripheral injection and needs to be performed within 3 min per fish to reduce the risk of mortality following injection. As such, prior practice of ICV injection is required to ensure that the method can be performed within the critical duration at the targeted area (Dn). In order to achieve a valid locomotor assessment of adult zebrafish, the open tank test is limited to only 4 h of assessment period per day. Hence, prior planning is required in an experimental framework that involves a large number of animals whereby extra time should be allocated to ensure that the setup met the minimum requirements for each recording (e.g., temperature and water depth). This planning is especially crucial in time-based experiments such as that of the current study, as each recording needs to be performed on the intended timepoint. The present experimental setup was limited to the study of two swimming parameters that specifically assessed the zebrafish motor function. Other behavioral parameters such as shoaling and anxiety-like behavior, however, required other experimental setups and different analytical methods. In summary, this is a reproducible and useful method to study the DpN neuroregeneration process in 6-OHDA-induced adult zebrafish which may yield important insights into cell replacement treatment strategies against PD.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [600-IRMI/FRGS 5/3 (033/2019)].
Materials | |||
6-Hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) | Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA | 162957 | |
Ascorbic acid | Thermo Fisher Scientific, California, USA | FKC#A/8882/53 | |
Disposable pasteur pipette, 3 mL | Thermo Fisher Scientific, California, USA | FB55348 | |
Microcentrifuge tube, 0.2 mL | Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany | 30124332 | |
Nice conical flask, 100 mL | Evergreen Engineering & Resources, Semenyih, Malaysia | SumYau0200 | |
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) | Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA | P4417 | |
Sodium bicarbonate | Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA | S5761 | |
Sodium chloride | Merck, Darmstadt, Germany | 106404 | |
Stereomicroscope | Nikon, Tokyo, Japan | SMZ745 | |
Tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) | Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA | E10521 | |
Equipment | |||
ANY-maze software | Stoelting Co., Illinois, USA | – | version 7.0; video tracking software |
Cubis II Micro Lab Balance | Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany | SE 2 | |
FemtoJet IV microinjector | Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany | 5192000035 | |
Femtotip II, sterile injection capillary | Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany | 5242957000 | |
InjectMan 4 micromanipulator | Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany | 5192000027 | |
LED Portable Lamp | MR. DIY, Selangor, Malaysia | 9023251 | 20 mAh |
PELCO Pro Superalloy, offset, fine tips | Ted Pella, California, USA | 5367-12NM | |
Shanda aquarium heater | Yek Fong Aquarium, Selangor, Malaysia | SDH-228 | |
Thermometer | Sera Precision, Heinsberg, Germany | 52525 | |
Video camera | Nikon, Tokyo, Japan | D3100 |