Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBEM) is applied to image and analyze dendritic spines in the murine hippocampus.
Three-dimensional electron microscopy (3D EM) gives a possibility to analyze morphological parameters of dendritic spines with nanoscale resolution. In addition, some features of dendritic spines, such as volume of the spine and post-synaptic density (PSD) (representing post-synaptic part of the synapse), presence of presynaptic terminal, and smooth endoplasmic reticulum or atypical form of PSD (e.g., multi-innervated spines), can be observed only with 3D EM. By employing serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM) it is possible to obtain 3D EM data easier and in a more reproducible manner than when performing traditional serial sectioning. Here we show how to prepare mouse hippocampal samples for SBEM analysis and how this protocol can be combined with immunofluorescence study of dendritic spines. Mild fixation perfusion allows us to perform immunofluorescence studies with light microscopy on one half of the brain, while the other half was prepared for SBEM. This approach reduces the number of animals to be used for the study.
Most of the excitatory synapses in the central nervous system are located on dendritic spines – small protrusions of a neuronal membrane. These protrusions form confined biochemical compartments that control intracellular signal transduction. Structural plasticity of dendritic spines and synapses is closely related to the functional changes in synaptic efficacy that underlie such important processes as learning and memory1,2. It is important to note that electron microscopy (EM) is the only technique that allows to determine if a dendritic spine has a presynaptic input. EM resolution is also needed to study ultrastructural details such as shape of a postsynaptic density (PSD), representing a postsynaptic part of a synapse, or dimensions of a dendritic spine, as well as the size and shape of an axonal bouton. Additionally, with EM it is possible to visualize synapses and their surroundings.
Thanks to advances in imaging and computing technologies it is possible to reconstruct entire neural circuits. Volume electron microscopy techniques, such as serial section transmission electron microscopy (ssTEM), serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM), and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) are commonly used for neuronal circuit reconstructions3.
In our studies, the SBEM method is successfully employed to investigate the structural plasticity of dendritic spines and PSDs in samples of the mouse hippocampus and organotypic brain slices 4,5. The SBEM is based on the installation of a miniature ultramicrotome inside the scanning electron microscope chamber6,7,8,9. The top of the sample block is imaged, and then the sample is cut at a specified depth by the ultramicrotome, revealing a new block-face, which is again imaged and then the process is repeated8. As a result, only the image of a block-face is left while the slice which has been cut is lost as debris. That is why SBEM is called a destructive technique, meaning it is not possible to image the same place again. However, the advantage of the destructive on-block methods is that they do not suffer from warping problems and section loss that can significantly affect the data quality and the data analysis3. Moreover, SBEM gives the possibility to image a relatively large field of view ( > 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm) at high resolution3.
To employ SBEM, samples have to be prepared according to a dedicated, highly contrasting protocol due to the backscattered electron detector used for acquiring images. We show here how to perform sample preparation according to the protocol based on a procedure developed by Deerinck10 (National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research (NCMIR) method), using reduced osmium-thiocarbohydrazide-osmium (rOTO) stains developed in the 1980s8,11. In addition, we introduce a two-step fixation approach, with mild fixation perfusion that allows to use the same brain both for immunofluorescence studies with light microscopy and SBEM.
In the protocol a mouse brain is primarily fixed with a mild fixative, and then cut into halves, and one hemisphere is postfixed and prepared for immunofluorescence (IF), while the other for EM studies (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the workflow for the dendritic spines preparation for the analysis with SBEM. Mice were sacrificed and perfused with a mild primary fixative. The brain was cut into halves, and one hemisphere was postfixed with immunofluorescence (IF)-dedicated fixative, cryoprotected, sliced using a cryostat and processed for IF studies, while the other hemisphere was postfixed with EM fixative, sliced with the vibratome and prepared for EM studies. Brain slices for SBEM studies were contrasted, flat embedded in resin, then a CA1 region of the hippocampus was mounted to the pin, and imaged with SBEM (Figure 1). The part of the protocol highlighted in a yellow box was featured in the video. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The research was performed in compliance with Nencki Institute guidelines and permission of the Local Ethical Committee. The studies were carried out in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC), Animal Protection Act of Poland and approved by the first Local Ethics Committee in Warsaw. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.
CAUTION: All procedures described below must be carried out in a laboratory fume hood. Due to the hazardous nature of the reagents used. Personal safety measures such as gloves, lab coat, safety glasses and a face mask are required.
1. Preparation of the fixative for perfusion (2% wt/vol paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 0.5% vol/vol glutaraldehyde (GA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4)
NOTE: Prepare the fixative solution on the same day as it will be used and do not store it longer than for 3 hours. In case of time shortage, prepare 2% PFA in 0.1 M PB the day before, store it at 4 °C and add fresh GA shortly before the perfusion.
2. Preparation of postperfusion fixative for SBEM (2% wt/vol PFA and 2.5% vol/vol GA in 0.1 M PB, pH 7.4)
3. Preparation of postperfusion fixative for IF staining (4% PFA in phosphate buffered saline (PBS))
4. Transcardial perfusion of animals
NOTE: All PFA and GA wastes must be collected and stored for disposal according to the local regulations. Anesthesia and perfusion should follow the local regulations. In the described protocol adult 3-month-old and 20±1-month-old female Thy1-GFP(M) mice (Thy1-GFP +/-)12 expressing green fluorescence protein (GFP) in a sparsely distributed population of glutamatergic neurons were used but any other can be used as well. Animals were bred as heterozygotes with the C57BL/6J background in the Animal House of the Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology.
5. Brain slices preparation for electron microscopy
6. Brain sample preparation for immunostaining
7. Immunostaining of brain slices
NOTE: All staining steps were performed in a 24-well plate on a platform shaker.
8. SBEM sample preparation
CAUTION: Due to the hazardous nature of reagents used all the procedures described below must be carried out in a laboratory fume hood. Before using these chemicals read carefully the Material Safety Data Sheets provided by the manufacturers and ask the safety officer about the local rules to ensure safe handling and waste disposal.
9. SBEM imaging
10. 3D reconstructions
NOTE: For the steps mentioned below we use open-access software e.g. FijiJ17 (ImageJ version 1.49b), Microscopy Image Browser (MIB)18 and Reconstruct19 but various other software can be employed.
Using the method described above high contrast, good resolution images of the mouse brain tissue can be obtained. A large field of view provided by the SBEM technique facilitates precise selection of the region of interest. The large image of the CA1 region of the hippocampus was taken to measure the length of stratum radiatum (SR) (Figure 2A) and to set the imaging precisely in the center (Figure 2B). Next, the stack of images was acquired and the objects of interest, such as dendrites, dendritic spines, postsynaptic densities of the synapses were segmented (Figure 2C,D).
The use of the SBEM technique gives the possibility to analyze a relatively large volume of tissue and to recognize rare events such as a multi-innervated dendritic spine (Figure 2E) – a particular type of synapses that is characterized by several presynaptic terminals contacting the same postsynaptic spine21.
Figure 2. Dendritic spines in mouse hippocampus CA1 region. Representative image of mouse hippocampal CA1 region. Stratum radiatum (SR) is shown with a white arrow (A). The region in the middle of SR was chosen for imaging (B). Reconstruction of a piece of dendrite with dendritic spines (C). Reconstruction of dendritic spines in a volume of tissue (D). Reconstruction of a multi-innervated dendritic spine (E). Two presynaptic terminals contacting the same postsynaptic spine are shown (in magenta and green). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The presented protocol for SBEM sample preparation allowed us to obtain high-quality images of the brain tissue with heavily contrasted membranes, which enables easier segmentation and reconstruction of membrane surrounded structures. The standard fixation with the higher concentration of PFA (Figure 3B) and the two-step fixation approach resulted in similar tissue morphology (Figure 3A).
Figure 3. Morphological details. With the use of the protocol presented here good quality images showing the morphology of synaptic vesicles, PSD and mitochondria were obtained. Brain tissue fixed with two-step approach (A) or with a standard fixative (B). Scale bar 2 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The results are reproducible, meaning that every specimen prepared using this protocol, not only brain tissue but also the monolayer of cultured cells, was well contrasted.
The use of mild primary fixation offers the opportunity to use the tissue also for immunofluorescence studies involving a light microscope. In the case of the PSD-95 antibody, we did not observe the difference in immunostaining results between the samples fixed with two-step fixation (mild primary and then secondary with a traditional fixative) and the one obtained using traditional fixation with 4% PFA only (Figure 4A and 4B, respectively).
Figure 4. Comparison of PSD-95 immunofluorescence in samples fixed with various protocols. Representative microphotographs of PSD-95 immunostaining in the stratum radiatum layer of CA1 area in the dorsal hippocampus. (A) Confocal image after mild primary fixation followed by postfixation with a standard fixative. (B) Confocal image after standard, stronger fixation. Scale bars: 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
There are many variations of the primary NCMIR method described by Deerinck in 201010. The basic principles remain the same but, depending on the type of material studied, slight changes are implemented. It was described previously that different resins can be used to embed specimens for SBEM and for example in the case of plants, Spurr's is the resin of choice due to its low viscosity that allows better infiltration through the cell walls22,23. Moreover, various buffers can be applied for fixation (e.g., cacodylate buffer, HEPES, or phosphate buffer as well as a different concentration of glutaraldehyde (2-3%) and paraformaldehyde (2-4%)23,24,25,26,27,28). The use of tannic acid to enhance staining of samples rich in extracellular matrix29 or ruthenium red to improve staining of plant material23,30 are another amendments that can be used. As far as dehydration is concerned usually ethanol and/or acetone are recommended for epoxy resin24,28.
The same protocol as described here, or very similar, has been successfully used before by our team and other groups4,5,24. Samples processed according to this method are compatible with TEM imaging31. In comparison with the original NCMIR protocol published in 201010 we introduce some minor changes such as replacement of toxic cacodylate buffer during fixation and osmium post-fixation step with a phosphate buffer. As mentioned above, diverse buffers can be used during EM preparation, and according to our experience, non-toxic PB gives satisfactory results.
Another change is a replacement of acetone with less user-harmful ethanol during the last step of dehydration. Ethanol was also used as a resin solvent during the embedding process. Moreover, DMP-30 was used instead of epoxy resin component C, as published before32,33.
Due to the need to use the same brains for immunofluorescence studies the two-step fixation approach was introduced. First, the animals were perfused with a buffer containing a lower concentration of glutaraldehyde (mild primary fixation by perfusion with a buffer containing 2% PFA and 0.5% GA) and after that only half of the brain dedicated to EM was further postfixed with a higher concentration of glutaraldehyde (2% PFA and 2.5% GA), while the other half of the brain was postfixed with a standard fixative for immunostaining (4% PFA). The use of EM fixative with a lower concentration of PFA was published before by others and our group4,5,31,34. The two-step fixation presented here is as sufficient as a traditional one-step approach (Figure 3 and Figure 4). However, since we propose that each half of the brain can be processed separately, our protocol allows to reduce the number of animals used. Mild primary fixation successfully maintains tissue antigenicity, enabling further immunofluorescence as demonstrated for the antibody against PSD-95 protein. It has to be emphasized, however, that the utility of our approach has to be validated for other antibodies.
The presented method results in high contrast images of the brain tissue with clearly visible membranes. It is worth mentioning, however, that there are the same steps prone to failure, as in the case of any other method of SBEM sample preparation, and particular attention needs to be paid to them. The quality of the tissue morphology itself depends mostly on the perfusion. It is a critical step, as only successfully fixed specimens give satisfactory results. Unfortunately, fixation perfusion is influenced by individual variability among animals, thus the quality of images may vary from one animal to another. Moreover, one has to be careful not to dry the specimen during dehydration; otherwise, the sample will not be infiltrated properly with the resin. Another important aspect is sample mounting to the pin. The epoxy resins are nonconductive, and therefore they accumulate electrons during imaging what causes charging artifacts. To reduce the charging effect in SBEM, it is necessary to carefully remove excess of resin at every side of the specimen and accurately ground the sample with silver paint and sputter coating.
The current protocol focuses on brain tissue; however, it can be adapted for cell monolayer, organotypic slices, or other tissues. Like the original NCMIR protocol, the one presented here results in highly contrasted samples that are suitable not only for SBEM, but also for FIB-SEM and ATUM-SEM experiments.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
SBEM imaging, light microscopy imaging and electron microscopy sample preparation were performed with the use of the equipment of Laboratory of Imaging Tissue and Function which serves as an imaging core facility at the Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology.
For preparation of Figure 1, the image of a mouse (Souris_02), and a vial from the https://smart.servier.com/ was used.
This work was supported by the National Science Centre (Poland) Grant Opus (UMO-2018/31/B/NZ4/01603) awarded to KR.
Anesthetic: | |||
Ketamine/xylazine mixture (Ketamina/Sedazin) | Biowet Pulawy, Pulawy, Poland | ||
Sodium pentobarbital (Morbital) | Biowet Pulawy, Pulawy, Poland | ||
Fixatives: | |||
Glutaraldehyde (GA) | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | G5882 | Grade I, 25% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative |
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) | POCH, Gliwice, Poland | 575283115 | pure p.a. |
Paraformaldehyde (PFA) | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | 441244 | prilled, 95% |
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | P4417-50TAB | tablets |
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | S5881 | reagent grade, 98%, pellets (anhydrous) |
Sodium phosphate dibasic (Na2HPO4) | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | S3264 | |
Sodium phosphate monobasic (NaH2PO4) | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | S3139 | |
Perfusion: | |||
Large blunt/blunt curved scissors (~14.5 cm) | Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA, USA | 14519-14 | |
Micro-spatula (double 2" flat ends, one rounded, one tapered to 1/8") | Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA, USA | 10091-12 | |
Needle tip, 15 GA, blunt (perfusion needle) | KD Medical GmbH Hospital Products, Berlin, Germany | KD-FINE 900413 | 1.80 x 40 mm |
Pair of fine (Graefe) tweezers | Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA, USA | 11050-10 | |
Perfusion pump | Lead Fluid | BQ80S | |
Plastic vials | Profilab, Warsaw, Poland | 534.02 | plastic vials with blue cap for tissue storage, 20 ml, 31 x 48 mm |
Straight iris scissors (~9 cm) | Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA, USA | 14058-11 | |
Brain slices preparation for EM: | |||
12-well plate | NEST, Rahway, NJ, USA | 712001 | |
Cyanoacrylic glue | Fenedur, Montevideo, Uruguay | ||
Glass vials | Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA | 72632 | 20 ml Scintillation Vial, a pack of 100 |
Pasteur pipette | VWR, Radnor, PA, USA | 612-4545 | LDPE, disposable, 7.5 ml |
Razor blade | Wilkinson Sword, London, UK | Classic double edge safety razor blades | |
Scalpel blade | Swann-Morton, Sheffield, UK | No. 20 | |
Vibratome | Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria | Leica VT1000 S | |
Brain slices preparation for IF: | |||
96-well plate | NEST, Rahway, NJ, USA | 701101 | |
Criostat | Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria | Leica CM 1950 | |
Ethylene glycol | Bioshop, Burlington, Canada | ETH001 | |
Low-profile disposable blade 819 | Leica Biosystems Inc., USA | 14035838925 | |
Scalpel blade | Swann-Morton, Sheffield, UK | No. 20 | |
Sodium azide (NaN3) | POCH, Gliwice, Poland | 792770426 | |
Sucrose | POCH, Gliwice, Poland | 772090110 | |
Tissue freezing medium for cryosectioning, OCT-Compound | Leica Biosystems, Switzerland | 14020108926 | |
Immunostaining: | |||
24-well plate | NEST, Rahway, NJ, USA | 702001 | |
Anti-Post Synaptic Density Protein 95 Antibody | Merck-Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA | MAB1598 | |
Confocal microscope | Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany | Zeiss Spinning Disc microscope (63 × oil objective, NA 1.4, pixel size 0.13 µm × 0.13 µm) | |
Cover slide | Menzel Glaser, Braunschweig, Germany | B-1231 | 24 x 60 mm |
Donkey anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 555 | Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA | A31570 | |
Fluoromount-G Mounting Medium, with DAPI | Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA | 00-4959-52 | |
Microscope slide | Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA | AGAA00008 | SuperFrost |
Normal donkey serum (NDS) | Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA | 017-000-121 | |
Shaker | JWElectronic, Warsaw, Poland | KL-942 | |
TritonT X-100 Reagent Grade | Bioshop, Burlington, Canada | TRX506 | |
Electron microsocpy sample preparation | |||
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) trihydrate | POCH, Gliwice, Poland | 746980113 | |
Aclar 33C Film | Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA | 50425 | Fluoropolymer Film embedding sheet |
DMP-30, 2,4,6-Tris(dimethylaminomethyl)phenol | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | T58203 | Epoxy embedding medium accelerator |
Durcupan ACM single component A, M | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | 44611 | Durcupan ACM single component A, M epoxy resin |
Durcupan ACM single component B | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | 44612 | Durcupan ACM single component B, hardener 964 |
Durcupan ACM single component D | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | 44614 | Durcupan ACM single component D , plasticizer |
Ethyl alcohol absolute | POCH, Gliwice, Poland | 64-17-5 | Ethyl alcohol absolute 99.8 % pure P.A.-BASIC |
Genlab laboratory oven | Wolflabs, York, UK | Mino/18/SS | Oven Genlab MINO/18/SS 18l volume, no fan circulation, no digital display, standard temperature gradient, standard recovery rate, no timer, 250°C maximum temperature, 240V electrical supply |
L-Aspartic acid | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | A-9256 | reagent grade, 98% (HPLC) |
Lead (II) nitrate | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | 467790 | 99.95% trace metals basis |
Osmium tetroxide | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | 75632 | for electron microscopy, 4% in H2O |
pH meter | Elmetron, Zabrze, Poland | CP-5-5 | |
Rotator | BioSan, Józefów, Poland | Multi Bio RS-24 | rotator Multi Bio RS-24 |
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | S5881 | reagent grade, 98%, pellets (anhydrous) |
Sunflower mini shaker | Grant bio, Shepreth,UK | PD-3D | |
Syringe filter | Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA | SLGP033NB | 0,22 µm pore size |
Thiocarbohydrazide | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | 88535 | purum p.a., for electron microscopy, 99.0% (N) |
Uranyl acetate | Serva, Heidelberg, Germany | 77870 | Uranyl acetate·2H2O, research grade |
Water bath | WSL, Swietochlowice, Poland | LWT | |
Specimen mounting for SBEM | |||
96-well culture plate | VWR, Radnor, PA, USA | 734-2782 | 96-well plates, round bottom, non treated |
AM Gatan 3View stub handling tweezers | Micro to Nano, Haarlem, Netherlands Netherlands |
50-001521 | |
Binocular | OPTA-TECH, Warsaw, Poland | X2000 | |
Conductive glue | Chemtronics, Georgia, USA | CW2400 | conductive eopxy |
Gatan 3View sample pin stubs | Micro to Nano, Haarlem, Netherlands Netherlands |
10-006003 | |
Parafilm | Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MI, USA | P7793 | roll size 20 in. × 50 ft |
Pelco conductive silver paint | Ted Pella, Redding, CA, USA | 16062-15 | PELCO® Conductive Silver Paint, 15g |
Razor blades double edge | Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA | 72000 | Stainless Steel "PTFE" coated. PERSONNA brand .004" thick, wrapped individually, 250 blades in a box. |
Scanning Electron Microscope | Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany | Sigma VP with Gatan 3View2 chamber, acceleration voltage 2.5 kV, variable pressure 5 Pa, aperture 20 µm, dwell time 6 µs, slice thickness 60 nm, magnification 15 000 x, image resolution 2048 x 2048 pixels, pixel size 7.3 nm | |
trim 90° diamond knife | Diatome Ltd., Nidau, Switzerland | DTB90 | |
Ultramicrotome | Leica Microsystems, Vienna, Austria | Leica ultracutR | |
Software | webpage | tutorials | |
FijiJ | https://fiji.sc/ | ||
Microscopy Image Browser | http://mib.helsinki.fi/ | http://mib.helsinki.fi/tutorials.html | |
Reconstruct | https://synapseweb.clm.utexas.edu/software-0 | https://synapseweb.clm.utexas.edu/software-0) | |
Animals | |||
Mice | Adult 3-month old and 20±1 month old female Thy1-GFP(M) mice (Thy1-GFP +/-) (Feng et al.,2000) which express GFP in a sparsely distributed population of glutamatergic neurons. Animals were bred as heterozygotes with the C57BL/6J background in the Animal House of the Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology. |