Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is activated in the G2 phase of the cell cycle and regulates many cellular pathways. Here, we present a protocol for an in vitro kinase assay with Cdk1, which allows the identification of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites for establishing cellular targets of this important kinase.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) is a master controller for the cell cycle in all eukaryotes and phosphorylates an estimated 8 – 13% of the proteome; however, the number of identified targets for Cdk1, particularly in human cells is still low. The identification of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites is important, as they provide mechanistic insights into how Cdk1 controls the cell cycle. Cell cycle regulation is critical for faithful chromosome segregation, and defects in this complicated process lead to chromosomal aberrations and cancer.
Here, we describe an in vitro kinase assay that is used to identify Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites. In this assay, a purified protein is phosphorylated in vitro by commercially available human Cdk1/cyclin B. Successful phosphorylation is confirmed by SDS-PAGE, and phosphorylation sites are subsequently identified by mass spectrometry. We also describe purification protocols that yield highly pure and homogeneous protein preparations suitable for the kinase assay, and a binding assay for the functional verification of the identified phosphorylation sites, which probes the interaction between a classical nuclear localization signal (cNLS) and its nuclear transport receptor karyopherin α. To aid with experimental design, we review approaches for the prediction of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites from protein sequences. Together these protocols present a very powerful approach that yields Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites and enables mechanistic studies into how Cdk1 controls the cell cycle. Since this method relies on purified proteins, it can be applied to any model organism and yields reliable results, especially when combined with cell functional studies.
Kinases are enzymes that transfer phosphate groups from ATP onto substrates and regulate many cellular processes. This phosphorylation is reversible, fast, adds two negative charges, and stores free energy, and is one of the most common posttranslational modifications used by cells. Cdk1, which is also known as cell division cycle protein 2 homolog (cdc2) is a master controller for the cell cycle in all eukaryotes1,2,3,4,5, and phosphorylates an estimated 8-13% of the proteome6,7.
While recent proteomic studies have identified many phosphorylation sites in proteins, in most cases, the kinase responsible for these modifications is unknown. The number of known Cdk1 targets, particularly in human cells is low7. The identification of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites is important, as it enables mechanistic studies that establish how Cdk1 controls the cell cycle. Cell cycle regulation is important for faithful chromosome segregation and cell division, and a myriad of cellular processes need to occur to support this important physiological function. This includes halting transcription and translation prior to the onset of mitosis, as well as a dramatic reorganization in cellular structure and organization, such as disassembly of the nuclear envelope, chromosome condensation, and mitotic spindle assembly. Deregulation and errors in these processes cause cancer, birth defects, or mitotic cell death. Specific inhibitors of Cdk1 such as RO-3306 were developed8, which provide powerful tools for functional studies, and some of these inhibitors are currently in clinical trials for cancer treatment (see9 for review).
Here, we describe an in vitro kinase assay that allows the identification of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites. In this assay, commercially available human Cdk1/cyclin B is used to phosphorylate a purified target protein in vitro. Phosphorylation of a substrate increases its mass and adds two negative charges; therefore, successful phosphorylation is confirmed by an upward shift of the protein gel band on SDS-PAGE. Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites are subsequently identified by mass spectrometry analysis of the in vitro phosphorylated protein. To aid with experimental design, we also review computational tools and references for the prediction of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites from the protein sequence. Furthermore, we also describe purification protocols that yield highly pure and homogeneous protein preparations suitable for the kinase assay. Finally, the identified phosphorylation sites must be verified by functional studies, and a simple binding assay is described here for that purpose. Combined, this is a very powerful approach that yields Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites and enables mechanistic studies into how Cdk1 controls the cell cycle7,10,11. Since this method relies on purified proteins, it can be applied to any model organism and yields reliable results. However, functional verification of the obtained phosphorylation sites in vitro is recommended, as cells have additional regulatory mechanisms in place, such as posttranslational modifications, interaction partners, or cellular localization that may render phosphorylation sites accessible or inaccessible for recognition by Cdk1.
Cdk1 recognizes a consensus phosphorylation site that consists of (Ser/Thr-Pro-X-Lys/Arg), where X is any residue and a serine or threonine is the site of phosphorylation. Especially important for recognition is the presence of the proline in the +1 position. In addition, basic residues are preferred in the +2 or +3 positions, with most Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites containing a Lys or Arg at the +3 position6,12.
Activation of Cdk1 is tightly regulated and leads to the onset of mitosis1,2,3,4,5. The activity of cyclin-dependent kinases in general depends on their association with distinct cyclins (cyclin A, B, C, D, and E in humans), which are expressed at oscillating levels throughout the cell cycle13. Cdk1 expression is constant across the cell cycle and the regulation of its activity relies on its association with the regulatory subunits cyclin A and cyclin B5,13,14,15, as well as post-translational modifications. Formation of the Cdk1/cyclin B complex is required for the kinase activation5,14,15,16,17,18. In the G2 phase, cyclin B is translated in the cytosol and imported into the nucleus where it binds to Cdk15,14,15,16,17,18; however, Cdk1/cyclin B is held inactivated by phosphorylation at residues Thr14 and Tyr15 by the human Cdk1-inhibitory kinases Myt1 (membrane-associated tyrosine- and threonine-specific cdc2-inhibitory kinase) and Wee1, respectively19,20,21. In the late G2 phase, dephosphorylation of Thr14 and Tyr15 by cell division cycle 25 phosphatase (cdc25) activates the kinase activity of the Cdk1/cyclin B complex and triggers the initiation of mitosis12,14,18,20,22,23. Phosphorylation of Thr161 is also required for Cdk1/cyclin B activation and is mediated by Cdk7, the Cdk-activating kinase (CAK)18. Degradation of cyclin B in anaphase inactivates Cdk1, allowing exit from mitosis24,25. Activation of Cdk1/cyclin B is therefore a complicated process. The protocol presented here is performed with commercially available Cdk1/cyclin B. During recombinant expression of this complex in insect cells, it is activated in vivo by endogenous kinases14,20 and remains active in the purified state. The resulting active, recombinant human Cdk1/cyclin B is suitable for in vitro kinase assays.
Here, we describe a protocol for the identification of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites in the human centromere protein F (CENP-F)10. CENP-F is a kinetochore protein that resides in the nucleus during most of interphase (G1 and S-phase) and is exported to the cytosol in the G2 phase26,27,28 in a Cdk1-dependent manner10,11. Nuclear localization is conferred by a bipartite cNLS26. cNLSs are recognized by the nuclear transport factor karyopherin α, which facilitates, together with karyopherin β and RanGDP, the import of cNLS-cargo into the nucleus29. Nuclear export in the G2 phase is facilitated via an unknown export pathway10. Once CENP-F resides in the cytosol, it is recruited to the nuclear envelope and in turn recruits the motor protein complex dynein30,31. This pathway is important to position the nucleus respective to the centrosome during initial stages of mitotic spindle assembly in a dynein-dependent manner, which is important for the correct timing of mitotic entry and for a fundamental process in brain development30,31,32. Starting in the G2 phase, CENP-F is also assembled into the kinetochore where it has important roles for faithful chromosome segregation27,28,33,34,35. A key regulatory step of these pathways is the nuclear export of CENP-F in the G2 phase, which is dependent on Cdk110,11. We describe here a protocol for the identification of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites in the cNLS of CENP-F. Phosphomimetic mutations of these sites slow down nuclear import of CENP-F, suggesting that Cdk1/cyclin B directly regulates cellular localization of CENP-F by phosphorylation of its cNLS10.
Overall, this in vitro kinase assay allows the identification of specific substrates for the kinase Cdk1. Purified target proteins are phosphorylated in vitro by the commercially available Cdk1/cyclin B complex and the phosphorylation sites are subsequently identified by mass spectrometry. The identification of Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites supports mechanistic studies that reveal how Cdk1 controls the cell cycle.
1. Prediction of Cdk1-specific Phosphorylation Sites from the Protein Sequence
2. Expression of Recombinant Proteins in Escherichia Coli
3. Purification of Recombinant Protein by Glutathione-affinity Chromatography and Gel Filtration
4. Purification of Recombinant Protein by Ni-NTA Affinity Chromatography
5. In Vitro Kinase Assay with Cdk1/Cyclin B
6. Identification of Cdk1-specific Phosphorylation Sites by Mass Spectrometry
7. Functional Verification: Testing the Effects of Phosphomimetic Mutations on Protein-protein Interactions by Analytical Size Exclusion Chromatography
NOTE: For functional verification of the identified Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites, phosphomimetic mutants of CENP-F fragments were created by replacing the identified phosphorylation sites with aspartates. The negative charge of aspartate mimics the effects of phosphorylation. A S3048D mutant of the CENP-F fragment (residues 2,987-3,065) was created.
We have recently used an in vitro kinase assay (Figure 1) to identify Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites in a CENP-F fragment that contained a cNLS10. This signal confers nuclear localization of CENP-F during most of interphase. In the G2 phase, CENP-F is exported from the nucleus to the cytosol in a Cdk1-dependent manner. To obtain mechanistic insights on how Cdk1 regulates cellular localization of CENP-F, we analyzed the sequence of CENP-F to predict Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites, using the iGPS server36,37. Within the cNLS of CENP-F, three Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites were predicted at residues 3,042, 3045, and 3,048 (Table 1). Another Cdk1-specific phosphorylation site was also predicted for residue 3,007 (Table 1)10. Therefore, we hypothesized that Cdk1 regulates CENP-F localization directly by phosphorylation of its cNLS.
To test whether the cNLS of CENP-F is a substrate for Cdk1, we performed an in vitro kinase assay with the purified human CENP-F fragment (residues 2,987-3,065) and human Cdk1/cyclin B. In vitro phosphorylated CENP-F was analyzed on 16% SDS-PAGE, together with a negative control that lacked the kinase Cdk1 (Figure 2A)10. For in vitro phosphorylated CENP-F, a clear upward shift is observed for the band on the gel compared to the negative control. This is typical of phosphorylated proteins as each phosphate group adds two negative charges and additional mass. These results suggest that CENP-F is phosphorylated by Cdk1/cyclin B10.
To determine the number of CENP-F phosphorylation sites and to quantify the phosphorylation efficiency of these sites, the intact in vitro phosphorylated CENP-F fragment (84-mer) was analyzed by mass spectrometry (ESI-ITMS)10. The observed ESI-ion trap mass spectrum (Figure 2B) suggests that the intact CENP-F fragment is phosphorylated at four sites (Table 1)10.
The location of the phosphorylated amino acid sites in the sequence of CENP-F was assessed by examining tryptic digests by ESI-FTICR MS. Trypsin cleaves protein chains after lysines and arginines, and a trypsin digest of the CENP-F fragment resulted in several peptides, including one that contained residues 3,031-3,052. Mass spectra of this CENP-F peptide were consistent with phosphorylation at residues T3042, T3045, and S3048, which are located within the cNLS (Table 1)10. Mass spectra of another tryptic peptide (residues 2,995-3,016) were consistent with phosphorylation at S3007 (Table 1)10. All four Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites were also predicted from the sequence. Cdk1-specific substrates often contain a proline next to the residue that is phosphorylated6, as observed for residues T3042, T3045, and S3007. It should be noted that S3048 is a somewhat unusual Cdk1-specific phosphorylation site, as a phenylalanine is located next to the serine. To conclude, the results suggest that CENP-F is specifically phosphorylated at residues 3,007, 3,042, 3,045, and 3,048 by the kinase Cdk1. Three of these residues are located within the cNLS of CENP-F (Table 1), indicating that Cdk1 may regulate CENP-F cellular localization through phosphorylation of the cNLS in the G2 phase, when Cdk1 becomes active10.
To verify that these Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites have a physiological function, we created the phosphomimetic variant S3048D10. Phosphomimetic mutations mimic the effects of phosphorylation by negatively charged residues. Next, we purified the phosphomimetic version of the CENP-F fragment that contained the cNLS. The cNLS of CENP-F is recognized by the nuclear transport receptor karyopherin α, which binds with high affinity and is required for nuclear import of CENP-F. To test whether the phosphomimetic mutation weakens the interaction between the cNLS of CENP-F with its nuclear transport receptor karyopherin α, we performed a binding assay (Figure 3)10. In these experiments, a purified CENP-F fragment (either the wild-type or the S3048D variant) was mixed with purified human karyopherin α, and the mixture was separated by analytical size exclusion chromatography. In addition, the proteins were also analyzed individually. SDS-PAGE analysis of the elution fractions revealed that the wild-type CENP-F fragment with the cNLS interacts strongly with karyopherin α, since both proteins co-elute (Figure 3)10. However, only a negligible amount of the CENP-F S3048D fragment binds to karyopherin α, and these proteins elute separately (Figure 3)10. These results suggest that phosphorylation of residue 3,048 of the cNLS of CENP-F would have a strong effect on the interaction with the nuclear transport factor karyopherin α. It should be noted that nuclear import rates are highly dependent on the affinity of a nuclear localization signal towards a nuclear transport factor46, and therefore, it is expected that these mutations slow down nuclear import10.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the Cdk1 in vitro kinase assay. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: CENP-F is phosphorylated by Cdk1/cyclin B. (A) To identify Cdk1 specific phosphorylation sites, an in vitro kinase assay was performed with purified CENP-F (residues 2,987-3,065). SDS-PAGE analysis of a negative control without Cdk1/cyclin B is shown in the left lane (-Cdk1), next to in vitro phosphorylated CENP-F in the right lane (+Cdk1). Molecular weight standards are indicated. Note the upward shift of phosphorylated CENP-F on SDS-PAGE, which is consistent with successful phosphorylation. Cdk1 and cyclin B appear as faint bands at 34 kDa and 60 kDa. (B) ESI-ion trap mass spectrometry of intact phosphorylated CENP-F from (A) was used to determine the phosphate load of the intact phosphorylated CENP-F (84-mer). The corresponding mass spectrum is shown. The intensity is plotted versus the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The spectrum shows the +10 to +14 charge states of the intact CENP-F fragment after phosphorylation. They indicate a species population with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 phosphate esters. To quantify the ratio of each species to total protein amount, the peak heights were determined and compared (Table 1). This figure has been modified from10 and was reproduced with permission by Taylor and Francis publisher. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Functional verification: phosphomimetic mutations of CENP-F strongly diminish the interaction with the nuclear transport receptor karyopherin α. (A–F) Purified CENP-F fragments (residues 2,987-3,065) (0.1 mg) and purified karyopherin α (0.7 mg) and were mixed in 1:1 molar ratio and analyzed by size exclusion chromatography. The CENP-F fragments and karyopherin α were also analyzed individually. SDS-PAGE analysis of the peak fractions is shown. Elution volumes are indicated on the bottom (in 0.6 mL increments). On the left, positions of molecular weight marker bands and their masses in kDa are indicated. An asterisk marks traces of residual GST (glutathione S-transferase). (A) Karyopherin α. (B) Elution profiles. The absorbance at 280 nm is plotted versus the elution volume. The elution profile for karyopherin α (red) is overlaid with elution profiles of mixtures of karyopherin α with CENP-F fragments (wild-type: green; phosphomimetic S3048D mutant: blue). Note that addition of the wild-type CENP-F fragment shifts the elution volume of the karyopherin α peak to higher mass, which is consistent with binding of the CENP-F wild-type fragment. This shift is not observed when the CENP-F fragment with the phosphomimetic mutation S3048D is added, suggesting that the phosphomimetic mutation greatly diminishes the interaction of CENP-F with karyopherin α. (C) CENP-F wild-type fragment (wt) and karyopherin α. (D) CENP-F wt fragment. (E) CENP-F S3048D fragment and karyopherin α. (F) CENP-F S3048D fragment. This figure was created with data from10. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1A. Sequence of the CENP-F fragment (residues 2987-3065) with predicted Cdk1-specific phosphorylation sites highlighted by larger font size. Tryptic fragments are highlighted in bold and underlined. | ||
GPLGSQQSKQDSRGSPLLGPVVPGPSPIPSVTEKRLSSGQNKAS | ||
GKRQRSSGIWENGGGPTPATPESFSKKSKKAVMSGIHPAE | ||
Table 1B. Mass spectrometry analysis of the intact CENP-F | ||
84 mer after in vitro phosphorylation with Cdk1/cyclin B | ||
# of phosphorylation sites (P) detected | Phosphate load expressed as % of total protein | |
CENP-F 2987-3065 | 0P | 6% |
1P | 37% | |
2P | 40% | |
3P | 15% | |
4P | 3% | |
Table 1C. Mass spectrometry analysis of tryptic peptides of CENP-F after in vitro phosphorylation with Cdk1/cyclin B | ||
# of phosphorylation sites | Phosphate load | |
Tryptic phosphopeptide, | 0P | 57% |
residues 2995-3016 | 1P | 43% |
Tryptic phosphopeptide, | 0P | 7% |
residues 3031-3052 | 1P | 64% |
2P | 29% | |
3P | 1% |
Table 1: Mass spectrometry analysis of the CENP-F fragment after in vitro phosphorylation with Cdk1/cyclin B. This table was created with data from10.
Our in vitro kinase assay is a very powerful method to identify molecular targets for the kinase Cdk1, which is a master controller of the cell cycle and regulates many important cellular processes. The method determines if a purified protein is a substrate for Cdk1 and allows identification of specific phosphorylation sites. This facilitates mechanistic studies for regulation of cellular processes by phosphorylation through Cdk1.
The most critical factor for successful identification of the phosphorylation sites by mass spectrometry is the phosphorylation efficiency of the kinase assay. The phosphorylation efficiency of the individual sites should be as high as possible, preferably 100%. This can be achieved by increasing the amount of Cdk1/cyclin B and increasing the incubation time to 16 h. When calculating the amount of Cdk1/cyclin B needed, the molar concentration of the protein and the number of phosphorylation sites should be considered. This is especially important if multiple phosphorylation sites are present in the target protein. It should also be noted that the activity of commercial Cdk1/cyclin B can vary from batch to batch, and that the kinase can lose activity rapidly. If in vitro phosphorylation is unsuccessful, it is recommended to test the activity of the kinase. As a positive control for troubleshooting, in vitro phosphorylation of CENP-F (residues 2,987-3,065) can be used. As a negative control, a reaction without Cdk1/cyclin B addition should be performed and analyzed. Another useful negative control is the use of a kinase-dead mutant of Cdk1, which is catalytically inactive, due to a simple point mutation (D146N)47,48,49. In addition, to verify identified phosphorylation sites, a phosphonegative version of the target protein can be created, where the phosphorylation sites are replaced by alanines. If the identified phosphorylation sites are correct, the corresponding phosphonegative mutant cannot be phosphorylated in vitro.
A simple tool to detect successful phosphorylation of the target protein is the simple SDS-PAGE gel shift assay described here. Phosphorylated proteins typically migrate slower on SDS-PAGE than their unphosphorylated counterparts, due to the added size and negative charges. Note that for large proteins, optimization of the SDS-PAGE analysis is required to enhance the resolution sufficiently to visualize the gel shift. A useful tool for the specific separation of phosphorylated proteins is phosphate-binding tag (Phos-tag) SDS-PAGE. Phosphorylated proteins in a gel prepared with Phos-tag acrylamide are visualized as slower migrating bands compared with corresponding dephosphorylated proteins50,51.
To obtain high quality mass spectra, it is very important that the protein for the in vitro kinase assay is pure and homogeneous. Our purification protocol achieves this by combining several highly selective chromatography steps and by preventing protein degradation and oxidation through the addition of protease inhibitors and reductants. The purification protocol can be modified to elute the protein by glutathione (i.e., with the GST-tag intact); however, it should be considered that the GST-tag adds another 25 kDa, and large proteins are challenging targets for mass spectrometry. Alternatively, our purification protocol for His6-tag fusion proteins can also be used.
This protocol can also be modified to identify phosphorylation sites that are specific for other kinases. The only requirement is that the purified kinase is available, active, and sufficiently stable. Assay conditions need to be adjusted for each kinase to achieve maximum activity. Parameters to optimize include the amount of the kinase, the reaction buffer (pH, salt concentration), incubation time, reaction temperature, and ATP concentration. In vitro kinase assays have been successfully used to identify phosphorylation sites for many kinases including Plks (polo-like kinases)52,53,54, and MAPK/ERK kinases (mitogen-activated protein kinases /extracellular-signal-regulated kinases)55,56.
While the strength of this method is to identify specific phosphorylation sites in a purified protein, it should be noted that a phosphorylation site that is a target for Cdk1 in vitro may not necessarily be phosphorylated in vivo. In vivo, additional regulatory mechanisms are in place, which could render a phosphorylation site inaccessible for recognition by Cdk1. For example, additional interaction partners may be present in vivo, which could either conceal a phosphorylation site or make it accessible through structural changes. Furthermore, the substrate needs to colocalize with Cdk1/cyclin B in the nucleus in the G2 phase in order to be phosphorylated. In addition, post-translational modifications or other regulatory processes could impact the conformation of the target protein in vivo, which could render a phosphorylation site inaccessible. These limitations can be overcome by designing appropriate experiments in cells or animal models that verify that the identified phosphorylation sites have a physiological function. Here, we use a simple binding assay for functional verification, since phosphorylation diminishes the interaction of CENP-F with karyopherin α. Functional verification should also be performed in the context of cells or an animal model. Therefore, we also transfected fluorescent fusion proteins of CENP-F-fragments that contained the cNLS into HeLa cells10. Phosphomimetic mutations within the cNLS of CENP-F diminished nuclear localization, which confirmed a physiological function of these phosphorylation sites10.
Several tools are available for functional verification of phosphorylation sites in cells or animal models. Phosphomimetic mutations, which mimic the effects of phosphorylation by negative charges, are widely used for this purpose. For these, the phosphorylation site (serine or threonine) is replaced by aspartate or glutamate. The advantage is that only a point mutation of the target protein is required. It should be noted, that while phosphomimetic mutations were successfully used in many cases for functional verification, they especially work in cases where charge changes are the predominant contributor for regulation rather than a structural change. Phosphomimetic mutations fail to mimic effects of phosphorylation in many other cases (e.g., 11). However, other approaches are available for functional verification of phosphorylation sites, including the use of phosphonegative mutations: these mutations prevent phosphorylation by replacing phosphorylation sites with alanine. Another useful approach for functional verification in cellular context is the expression of a kinase-dead mutant of Cdk1, which is inactivated by an easy-to-introduce point mutation (D146N)47,48,49. Notably, several small molecule Cdk1 inhibitors are commercially available such as Flavopiridol and RO-3306, which can be used for functional studies either in cells or animal models7,8,11. These inhibitors are well-characterized, and several are in clinical trials for cancer treatment (for a review see9).
While a large number of protein phosphorylation sites have been identified in proteomic studies, the kinase specificity is in most cases unknown, and the in vitro kinase assay is one of the few methods available to identify substrates of Cdk1. Other approaches have also been used. Cdk1 targets were identified by using an engineered Cdk1 enzyme. It has a larger substrate binding pocket and accepts more bulky versions of ATP as a substrate6. This bulky substrate cannot bind to wild-type kinases. The addition of radiolabeled bulky ATP to a cell extract containing the modified Cdk1 enzyme therefore leads to the specific labeling of the direct substrates of Cdk1. 200 Cdk1 targets were identified in budding yeast with this method; however, it cannot be applied to mammalian cells, which is a crucial limitation. In another study, Cdk1 substrates were identified in human tissue culture cells by performing quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis using two small molecule inhibitors of Cdk1, Flavopiridol, and RO-3306. 1215 phosphopeptides on 551 proteins were significantly reduced upon Cdk1 inhibitor addition7. This method can screen an entire proteome for potential Cdk1 targets, but resulting targets need to be verified, e.g., by an in vitro kinase assay.
In the future, the in vitro kinase assay will likely be combined with high throughput screens for Cdk1 substrates that are currently under development. Due to the large number of Cdk1 substrates in the proteome, many human Cdk1 substrates remain to be identified, and the in vitro kinase assay will be an important tool to identify, map, and verify these sites.
The in vitro kinase assay is a powerful tool to identify targets for the kinase Cdk1 and to identify specific phosphorylation sites. Identification of these phosphorylation sites enables mechanistic studies for the regulation of cellular processes by Cdk1.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Dr. David King, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley for mass spectrometry analysis and helpful comments. We thank Dr. Xuelian Zhu, Shanghai, Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China for providing a full-length CENP-F construct. Finally, we thank Dr. Susan Bane, Dr. Brian Callahan and Dr. Christof Grewer at Binghamton University for access to equipment. This research was funded by the Research Foundation for the State University of New York and the Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Binghamton.
2800 ml baffled Fernbach flask | Corning | 44232XL | |
ampicillin | Gold Biotechnology | A-301-25 | |
ATP | Fisher Scientfiic | BP413-25 | |
benzamidine hydrochloride | Millipore Sigma | B6506-25 | |
bottletop filter | Corning | 431161 | |
Cdk1/cyclin B recombinant, human 20,000 U/mL | New England Biolabs | P6020 | |
Cdk1/cyclin B (alternate source) | EMD Millipore | 14-450 | |
Cdk1/cyclin B (alternate source) | Invitrogen | PV3292 | |
Cdk1/cyclin B + 10x PK buffer | New England Biolabs | P6020 | |
CENP-F (residues 2987 – 3065) pGEX6P1 plasmid | Available upon request. | ||
centrifuge: Heraeus Multifuge X3R, cooled, with TX-1000 swing-out rotor | Thermo Scientific | 10033-778 | |
centrifugal filter units: Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter units, 3 kDa cutoff, Ultracel-PL membranes | EMD Millipore | UFC900324 | |
chlorampenicol | Gold Biotechnology | C-105-100 | |
D/L methionine | Agros Organics / Fisher | 125650010 | |
desalting pipet tips: Zip tips | Millipore Sigma | ZTC18S008 | |
disposable chromatography columns, Econo-Pac 1.5 x 12 cm | Biorad | 7321010 | |
dithiothreitol | Gold Biotechnology | DTT50 | |
E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3)pLysS strain | EMD Millipore | 71403 | |
electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion | Bruker Amazon | Apex III | |
cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer | |||
electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometer | Bruker Amazon | custom | |
fixed angle rotor: Fiberlite F15-8x-50cy | Thermo Scientific | 97040-276 | |
FPLC system: Äkta Pure FPLC | GE Healthcare | 29032697 | |
Gel filtration column: Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL | GE Healthcare | 28990944 | |
glutathione agarose | Pierce | 16101 | |
glutathione, reduced | Millipore Sigma | G4251-50g | |
incubation shaker: multitron shaker | Infors | I10102 | |
isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside | Gold Biotechnology | I2481C50 | |
kanamycin | Gold Biotechnology | K-120-25 | |
karyopherin α pet-28a pres plasmid | Available upon request. | ||
Luria Bertani medium | Fisher Scientfiic | BP1426-2 | |
microcentrifuge 5418R, refrigerated | Eppendorf | 5401000013 | |
microtubes (0.5 ml) | Eppendorf | 30121023 | |
microtubes (1.5 ml) | Eppendorf | 30120086 | |
Nickel affinity gel: His-Select Nickel affinity gel | Millipore Sigma | P6611-100ml | |
pGEX-6P-1 plasmid | Millipore Sigma | GE28-9546-48 | |
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride | Gold Biotechnology | P470-10 | |
PS protease: PreScission protease | GE Healthcare | 27084301 | |
Phos-tag acrylamide | Wako Pure Chem. Ind. | 304-93521 | |
reduced gluthathione | Millipore Sigma | G4251-50g | |
roundbottom centrifuge tubes (Oakridge tubes) | Fisher Scientfiic | 055291D | |
site-directed mutagenesis kit: QuikChange Lightning | Agilent | 210518 | |
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit | |||
sonifier: Branson S-250D sonifier | Branson | 15 338 125 | |
Spectra/Por 1RC dialysis membrane (6-8 kDa cutoff) | Spectrum Labs | 08 670B | |
swing out rotor TX-1000 | Thermo Scientific | 10033-778 |