HIV-1 pathogenesis is defined by both viral characteristics and host genetic factors. Here we describe a robust method that allows for reproducible measurements to assess the impact of the gag gene sequence variation on the in vitro replication capacity of the virus.
The protective effect of many HLA class I alleles on HIV-1 pathogenesis and disease progression is, in part, attributed to their ability to target conserved portions of the HIV-1 genome that escape with difficulty. Sequence changes attributed to cellular immune pressure arise across the genome during infection, and if found within conserved regions of the genome such as Gag, can affect the ability of the virus to replicate in vitro. Transmission of HLA-linked polymorphisms in Gag to HLA-mismatched recipients has been associated with reduced set point viral loads. We hypothesized this may be due to a reduced replication capacity of the virus. Here we present a novel method for assessing the in vitro replication of HIV-1 as influenced by the gag gene isolated from acute time points from subtype C infected Zambians. This method uses restriction enzyme based cloning to insert the gag gene into a common subtype C HIV-1 proviral backbone, MJ4. This makes it more appropriate to the study of subtype C sequences than previous recombination based methods that have assessed the in vitro replication of chronically derived gag-pro sequences. Nevertheless, the protocol could be readily modified for studies of viruses from other subtypes. Moreover, this protocol details a robust and reproducible method for assessing the replication capacity of the Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses on a CEM-based T cell line. This method was utilized for the study of Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses derived from 149 subtype C acutely infected Zambians, and has allowed for the identification of residues in Gag that affect replication. More importantly, the implementation of this technique has facilitated a deeper understanding of how viral replication defines parameters of early HIV-1 pathogenesis such as set point viral load and longitudinal CD4+ T cell decline.
Determining both the host and viral characteristics that influence HIV-1 pathogenesis and disease progression is paramount for rational vaccine design. The cellular immune response is a key component of the human immune response to HIV-1 infection. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) are necessary for the initial control of acute viremia, and allow the host to establish a steady state (set point) viral load1,2. Experimental depletion of these effector cells results in loss of viral control3,4. Despite this, escape mutations arise within the viral genome that subvert CTL recognition of virally infected cells5-9.
Certain HLA alleles have been associated with lower viral loads and slower disease progression including B*57, B*27 and B*8110-15. Part of the protective benefit of HLA class I alleles can be attributed to the fact that they target functionally constrained regions of the genome such as Gag and select for escape mutations that decrease the ability of the virus to replicate in vitro16-21. Although escape from the cellular immune system is beneficial to the virus in the context of the selecting HLA class I allele, the effect of these mutations may have differential consequences for the host upon transmission to an HLA-mismatched individual22,23. Therefore, understanding the effects of transmitted HLA-associated escape mutations on viral replication capacity will be important to further our understanding of early HIV-1 pathogenesis.
While much progress has been made to identify and characterize the fitness defects of individual escape mutations associated with specific HLA class I alleles24-29, naturally occurring HIV-1 isolates have unique and complex footprints of HLA-associated polymorphisms, likely arising from the HLA-mediated immune pressure of different immunogenetic backgrounds30. In a previous analysis, Goepfert et al. showed that an accumulation of HLA-associated mutations in the transmitted Gag sequences derived from 88 acutely infected Zambians was associated with a reduction in set point viral load31. This suggested that the transmission of deleterious escape mutations, specifically in Gag, to HLA-mismatched recipients provides a clinical benefit, and may be due to attenuated viral replication. Moving forward, it is imperative to study how complex combinations of Gag polymorphisms within naturally occurring isolates work in concert to define characteristics of the transmitted virus such as replication capacity, and how early replication might in turn affect HIV-1 clinical parameters and late-stage pathogenesis.
Brockman et al. first demonstrated a link between the replication capacity of gag-pro sequences isolated during chronic stage infection and viral load in both subtype C and B infections32-35. The experimental approach presented in these studies, although appropriate for examining the in vitro replication capacity of sequences derived from chronically infected individuals, has several technical caveats and limitations that make studying HIV-1 replicative capacity in subtype C acutely infected individuals difficult. This method relies on the recombination of population based PCR-amplified sequences into the subtype B NL4-3 provirus, which was derived in part from LAV, a laboratory adapted virus stock36. Virus generation was accomplished by co-transfection of a CEM-based T-cell line37 with PCR amplicons and digested delta-gag-pro NL4-3 DNA. This method requires the outgrowth of virus over a period of weeks to months, potentially skewing the nature of the recovered virus stock in relation to the viral quasispecies in vivo, and therefore altering the measurement of replication capacity in vitro. This method is more appropriate for studying chronically infected individuals, where it effectively selects for virus with the highest replicative capacity, and where cloning numerous different viral variants from a large number of chronically infected individuals is quite labor intensive and therefore not feasible. However, within an acutely infected individual, there are generally one to two variants present, and thus eliminating the risk of skewing the nature of the recovered virus stock, through in vitro selection pressures, allows for a more accurate assessment of in vitro replication capacity. Secondly, this method requires recombining subtype C gag-pro sequences into a subtype B derived backbone, and could introduce backbone incompatibility biases into the analysis. Due to these limitations, large numbers of sequences must be analyzed in order to overcome any potential biases introduced.
Here we describe an alternative experimental approach appropriate for studying sequences derived from subtype C acutely infected individuals. We use a restriction enzyme based cloning strategy to introduce the gag gene derived from acute infection time points of HIV-1 subtype C infected individuals into the subtype C proviral backbone, MJ4. The use of MJ4 as a common backbone in which to clone gag genes is crucial for the analysis of subtype C derived sequences. MJ4 is derived from a primary isolate38, and thus would be less likely to introduce bias due to subtype incompatibility between the backbone and gag gene. In addition, the approach of using enzyme based restriction cloning allows for the proviral constructs to be transfected directly into 293T cells, and for the recovery of a clonal virus stock identical to the cloned gag sequence.
The method presented below is a high throughput method for assessing the replication capacity of subtype C derived Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses. Transfection into 293T cells is straightforward and recovery of virus takes only three days. In vitro replication capacity is assayed on the same CEM-CCR5 based T-cell line created by Brockman et al.37, but using important protocol modifications necessary for the successful replication of subtype C MJ4 chimeric viruses. The use of an appropriate T-cell line rather than PBMCs allows for large numbers of subtype C MJ4-chimeric viruses to be tested with high assay reproducibility. Finally, using a radiolabeled reverse transcriptase assay for quantification of virus in the supernatant is more cost effective than using commercially available p24 ELISA kits. It also gives a higher dynamic range, which was important for detecting both poorly and highly replicating viruses within the same assay and for detecting subtle differences in replication between isolates.
In conclusion, the method presented here has allowed for the in-depth study of the replication capacity of gag sequences derived from HIV-1 subtype C acutely infected individuals from Zambia, and as written, could also be expanded to study other subtype C infected populations. A high degree of variation in replication capacities between different Gag isolates was observed. In addition, we were able to show a statistical association between the replication capacity of the transmitted Gag and set point viral load as well as with CD4+ decline over a three-year period39. Such results highlight the importance of studying how transmitted viral characteristics, such as replication capacity, interact with the host immune system to influence pathogenesis during early infection and will be integral for developing effective vaccine interventions as well as treatment.
1. Amplification of the HIV-1 gag Gene from Infected, Frozen Plasma
2. Preparing gag Amplicons for Cloning by Introduction of the Necessary Restriction Sites
3. Cloning Amplified gag Genes into the MJ4, Subtype C, Infectious Molecular Clone
4. Generation and Titering of Replication Competent Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
5. Preparation of Culture Media and Propagation of GXR25 Cells for in vitro Replication Assay
6. In vitro Replication of Gag-MJ4 Chimeras in GXR25 (CEM-CCR5-GFP) Cells
7. Analysis of Reverse Transcriptase (RT) in Cell Culture Supernatants
Protocol adapted from Ostrowski et al40.
In order to properly execute this protocol, which creates a proviral plasmid capable of assembling fully functional, infectious Gag-MJ4 chimeras, great care must be taken to generate the appropriate PCR amplicons. Determining whether the PCR has generated the appropriately sized gag amplicon is crucial. Products should be within 100 base pairs (bp) of the approximately 1,700 bp amplicon depicted in Figure 1A. The exact length of this fragment will vary depending on the gag gene under study. Next, the 5’ long terminal repeat (LTR) portion of the MJ4 molecular clone must be amplified and spliced to the gag amplicon in order to make it suitable for subsequent cloning. The MJ4 LTR amplicon should be 1,474 bp in length. Figure 1B shows a representative gel image for which correct band sizes are indicated. After the splice-overlap-extension PCR41, combined LTR-gag products should be approximately 3,200 bp in length, as depicted in Figure 1C.
Once the gag gene has been made suitable for cloning by fusion to the 5’ LTR from MJ4, which contains the necessary NgoMIV restriction site, both vector and gag insert must be digested with NgoMIV and BclI restriction enzymes and excised from an agarose gel after electrophoretic separation. It is imperative to excise the appropriate vector and insert bands. A representative gel is shown in Figure 2. The vector portion of the MJ4 plasmid should be approximately 10,000 bp in length, while the LTR-gag insert should remain at approximately 3,000 bp in length, as the restriction sites are located at the extreme ends of the amplicon. Any significant decrease in size will indicate an additional cut-site within the gag gene under study.
Following ligation of the two fragments, bacterial transformation, and isolation of plasmid DNA, the Gag-MJ4 chimeras must be checked for appropriate size by performing a double digest with NgoMIV and HpaI restriction enzymes. Full-length Gag-MJ4 chimeras that have not incurred any deletion events during bacterial replication should have a restriction pattern similar to that depicted in Figure 3, with two bands of approximately 8,700 and 4,300 bp.
An important distinction of this protocol compared to previous approaches, is the use of the HIV-1 subtype C infectious molecular clone, MJ4, rather than the more common laboratory-adapted NL4-3 virus. However, the approaches described in the previous section could be modified for cloning of subtype B gag sequences into pNL4-3.
An optimization of the multiplicity of infection (MOI) for use in subsequent experiments was performed in order to select the ideal MOI that showed logarithmic growth of a majority of the viruses tested. Figure 4 depicts representative replication curves from three different MOIs (0.01, 0.05, and 0.25) for MJ4 (Figure 4A) as well as for NL4.3 (Figure 4B). MJ4 replicates much less efficiently in GXR25 cells than NL4-3, which is important to take into account, as an MOI appropriate for NL4-3 replication would likely be too low to detect efficient MJ4 replication. As seen in Figure 4A, an MOI of 0.05 as opposed to 0.01 or 0.25, was the ideal choice, because logarithmic growth was observed between days 2-6 for MJ4. For the lower MOI, 0.01, day 6 DLU values are barely detectable, and we anticipated the generation of Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses that replicated lower than MJ4. Therefore this MOI would not capture the growth of the more attenuated Gag-MJ4 chimeras, which may also be the most biologically critical. Additionally, an MOI of 0.25 was not ideal, because the rapid kinetics of viral replication killed a substantial amount of cells even by day 4. This causes the replication curve to plateau, and calculating a slope based on a curve such as this would underestimate the replication capacity. Based on curves generated for NL4-3, even at an MOI of 0.01, available cell targets have been noticeably exhausted by day 6 post infection. In conclusion, an MOI of 0.05 was found to be optimal for a large panel of Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses, all of which had diverse Gag sequences and varying degrees of replication.
A total of 149 Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses derived from acute subtype C Gag sequences have been tested for in vitro replication using this assay. The normalized RC values ranged from 0.01 to over 3.5 with some viruses replicating more than 100 times more efficiently than wild-type MJ4. Figure 5 shows the replication curves from nine representative Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses, with wild-type MJ4 depicted in red, and demonstrates the wide range of replication capacities observed. Thus, the sequence diversity within the gag gene alone can drastically impact the ability of the virus to replicate in vitro. While this is representative of Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses derived from acutely infected Zambians, other subtype C sequences have not been extensively tested, and may exhibit different replication kinetics. Therefore, great care must be taken to optimize the MOI to suit the specific replication of the viruses of a particular study, because there can be a wide range in the levels of replication between different HIV-1 backbones and Gag isolates.
One of the advantages of using a T-cell line such as the GXR25 cell line, that supports the replication of MJ4, is the level of reproducibility observed relative to replication experiments using stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells as targets. In initial optimization experiments, MJ4 wild type exhibited an intra-assay variability of 8.7%, and different clones of the same Gag-MJ4 chimeric virus exhibited variability in replication of 8.5%. Because different master mixes and phosphoscreen exposures may give DLU values that differ slightly in magnitude, intra-assay variability can further be controlled by running the same virus standard (in our case wild-type MJ4) in each RT assay plate. Figure 6 graphs the DLU values derived from the same MJ4 infection, quantified in eight different RT plates. Normalizing to a virus that is common to all RT assays can help to mitigate potential error induced by these slight changes in signal magnitude between assays.
Inter-assay variably was also tested and replicates repeated on different days were highly correlated. Figure 7 plots the normalized RC score values from two independent experiments performed approximately one year apart. A high degree of correlation with the absence of major outliers (R2 = 0.873) was observed between the two independent replicates.
Although highly correlated, there is some variability in the overall magnitude of replication kinetics between the two independent experiments. This can be attributed in part to the difference in passage numbers between the GXR25 cells stocks used in each experiment. In general, GXR25 cells stocks that have been passaged for a period of time greater than 6 months tend to support more efficient replication of Gag-MJ4 chimeras. Therefore, it is advisable to assess replication capacity among groups of chimeras within a one-month time frame. When the previous steps are followed closely, this assay is capable of producing highly robust and reproducible results, which are applicable to a wide range of studies.
Figure 1. Representative gel images depicting electrophoretic separation of PCR products. For all PCR products, 5 µl of each 50 µl reaction was mixed with 3 µl of 5x loading dye, loaded into a 1% agarose-TAE gel supplemented with 1X SYBR-safe DNA gel stain, and separated by electrophoresis at 120 V for 45 min. The Promega 1 kb DNA ladder (Lane 1) was used to approximate amplicon sizes. A) The gag gene was amplified from viral RNA using a nested PCR approach. Due to insertions and deletions, the gag amplicon may vary from 1,600-1,700 bp in length and appears slightly above the 1,500 bp DNA ladder marker. Lanes 2-5 depict successful gag gene amplification. B) The 5’ LTR of MJ4 was amplified from the wild-type MJ4 plasmid and visualized via electrophoretic separation. Lanes 2-5 depict successful amplification of the 1,474 bp LTR product, which appears slightly below the 1,500 bp DNA ladder marker. C) The 5’ LTR derived from wild-type MJ4 and the gag gene amplified from patient plasma are fused together via splice-overlap-extension PCR and visualized via electrophoretic separation. Lanes 2-5 depict successfully fused amplicons that are approximately 3,200 bp in size, and which appear slightly above the 3,000 bp DNA ladder marker.
Figure 2. Representative gel image depicting electrophoretic separation of restriction digests for cloning patient gag genes into MJ4. Wild-type MJ4 plasmid and LTR-gag fusion products were digested with BclI for 1.5 hr at 50 °C and NgoMIV for 1 hr at 37 °C. Vector and insert fragments were visualized via electrophoretic separation on a 1% agarose-TAE gel supplemented with 1X SYBR-safe DNA gel stain at 100 V for 2 hr and using a blue light illuminator in order to reduce UV-induced DNA damage. The vector and insert fragments suitable for subsequent cloning steps appear at approximately 10,000 bp and 2,900 bp respectively.
Figure 3. Representative gel image depicting electrophoretic separation of restriction digests of purified Gag-MJ4 chimera plasmid DNA. Purified Gag-MJ4 chimera plasmid DNA was double-digested with NgoMIV and HpaI restriction enzymes for 2 hr at 37 °C. Restriction digests were visualized via electrophoretic separation on a 1% agarose-TAE gel supplemented with 1X SYBR-safe DNA gel stain at 120 V for 45 min. Plasmids without large deletions will resolve to two distinct bands at approximately 8,700 and 4,300 bp.
Figure 4. Replication of MJ4 and NL4-3 isolates of HIV-1 in the GXR25 cell line at different multiplicities of infection (MOI). 5 x 105 GXR25 cells were infected as described in the method protocol with 5-fold increasing MOI of each virus stock. Supernatants were collected on days 2, 4, 6, and 8 post infection and virion production was quantified via a radiolabeled reverse transcriptase assay. Infections were run in triplicate and error bars denote the standard deviation for the three replicates. (A) MJ4 (B) NL4-3.
Figure 5. Representative range of replication for different Gag-MJ4 chimeras. As described in the method protocol, 5 x 105 GXR25 cells were infected with wild-type MJ4 or Gag-MJ4 chimeras at an MOI of 0.05, supernatants were collected at two day intervals post infection, and virion production quantified by a radiolabeled RT assay. Insertion of various subtype C derived gag genes can have a dramatic impact on the replication capacity of MJ4. Wild-type MJ4 replication is denoted in red.
Figure 6. Comparison of intra-assay variation in the radiolabeled reverse transcriptase (RT) quantification assay. The graph depicts inherent intra-assay variability by plotting the DLU values of the same supernatants from a single wild-type MJ4 infection in eight different RT assay plates. The variation in curves reflects the slight changes in signal magnitude between plates, which can be corrected for by running a standard on each RT plate, which can be subsequently used to normalize the slopes of Gag-MJ4 chimeras assayed on the same plate.
Figure 7. Reproducibility of the replication assay over time in the GXR25 cell line. The same Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses were used to infect GXR25 cells in two independent experiments performed approximately one year apart. Replication scores were generated by calculating the slope of log-transformed DLU values and normalizing that slope to wild-type MJ4. Gag-MJ4 chimeras that replicate more efficiently than wild-type MJ4 have replication scores greater than 1, and those that replicate less efficiently than wild-type MJ4 have replication scores less than 1. The two independent measurements are strongly correlated (R2 = 0.87, linear regression) and highlight the reproducibility of assays performed at different times and with cells at different passages.
A)
Reagent | Volume for 1x reaction (μl) |
2x Reaction Mix (Invitrogen) | 25 |
Nuclease-free H2O | 17 |
Forward primer GOF (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
Reverse primer VifOR (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
SuperScript III One-step Enzyme Mix | 1 |
RNA template | 5 |
Total volume | 50 |
B)
Number of Cycles | Time (hr:min:sec) | Temperature (°C) |
1 | 1:00:00 | 50 |
1 | 2:00 | 94 |
10 | 0:15 | 94 |
0:30 | 56 | |
5:00 | 68 | |
40 | 0:15 | 94 |
0:30 | 56 | |
5:00 + 5 sec/cycle | 68 | |
1 | 12:00 | 68 |
1 | ∞ | 4 |
END |
Table 1. A) Master mix and B) thermocycler conditions for first-round gag amplification. *Note: GOF primer sequence: 5'-ATTTGACTAGCGGAGGCTAGAA-3'. VifOR primer sequence: 5'-TTCTACGGAGACTCCATGACCC-3'.
A)
Reagent | Volume for 1x reaction (μl) |
Nuclease-free H2O | 35.5 |
5x Phusion HF Buffer | 10 |
dNTPs (40 mM deoxynucleotides) | 1 |
Forward primer GagInnerF1 (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
Reverse primer BclIDegRev2 (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
Phusion Hot Start II Polymerase | 0.5 |
First-round PCR as template | 1 |
Total volume | 50 |
B)
Number of Cycles | Time (hr:min:sec) | Temperature (°C) |
1 | 0:30 | 98 |
29 | 0:10 | 98 |
0:30 | 53 | |
1:00 | 72 | |
1 | 10:00 | 72 |
1 | ∞ | 4 |
END |
Table 2. A) Master mix and B) thermocycler conditions for nested second-round gag amplification. *Note: GagInnerF1 primer sequence: 5'-AGGCTAGAAGGAGAGAGATG-3'. BclIDegRev2 primer sequence: 5'-AGTATTTGATCATAYTGYYTYACTTTR-3'.
A)
Reagent | Volume for 1x reaction (μl) |
Nuclease-free H2O | 35.5 |
5x Phusion HF Buffer | 10 |
dNTPs (40 mM deoxynucleotides) | 1 |
Forward primer MJ4For1b (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
Reverse primer MJ4Rev (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
Phusion Hot Start II Polymerase | 0.5 |
MJ4 plasmid as template (10 ng/ul) | 1 |
Total volume | 50 |
B)
Number of Cycles | Time (hr:min:sec) | Temperature (°C) |
1 | 0:30 | 98 |
29 | 0:10 | 98 |
0:30 | 58 | |
0:45 | 72 | |
1 | 10:00 | 72 |
1 | ∞ | 4 |
END |
Table 3. A) Master mix and B) thermocycler conditions for 5’ MJ4 LTR amplification. *Note: MJ4For1b primer sequence: 5'-CGAAATCGGCAAAATCCC-3'. MJ4Rev primer sequence: 5'-CCCATCTCTCTCCTTCTAGC-3'.
A)
Reagent | Volume for 1x reaction (μl) |
Nuclease-free H2O | 34.5 |
5x Phusion HF Buffer | 10 |
dNTPs (40 mM deoxynucleotides) | 1 |
Forward primer MJ4For1b (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
Reverse primer BclIRev (20 μM concentration) | 1 |
MJ4 LTR 1.3 kb amplicon (Gel purified, ~50 ng) | 1 |
Phusion Hot Start II Polymerase | 0.5 |
Gag amplicon (Gel purified, ~100 ng) | 1 |
Total volume | 50 |
B)
Number of Cycles | Time (hr:min:sec) | Temperature (°C) |
1 | 0:30 | 98 |
29 | 0:10 | 98 |
0:30 | 58 | |
1:30 | 72 | |
1 | 10:00 | 72 |
1 | ∞ | 4 |
END |
Table 4. A) Master mix and B) thermocycler conditions for splice-overlap-extension PCR to generate LTR-gag inserts. *Note: BclIRev primer sequence: 5'-TCTATAAGTATTTGATCATACTGTCTT-3'
A)
Reagent | Volume for 1x reaction (μl) | Incubation Time (hr) | Incubation Temperature (°C) |
1.5 μg of 3 kb LTR-gag amplicon or MJ4 plasmid | x μl for 1.5 μg | ||
NEB CutSmart Buffer (previously NEB Buffer #4) | 2 | ||
BclI restriction enzyme | 1 | ||
Nuclease-free H2O | x | ||
Total volume | 19 | 1.5 | 50 |
NgoMIV restriction enzyme | 1 | ||
Total volume | 20 | 1 | 37 |
B)
Reagent | Volume for 1x reaction (μl) | Incubation Time (hr) | Incubation Temperature (°C) |
50 ng cut MJ4 plasmid vector | x μl for 50 ng | ||
45 ng cut LTR-gag insert (3:1 ratio) | x μl for 45 ng | ||
Roche 10x ligase buffer | 2 | ||
Roche T4 DNA ligase (5 U/μl) | 1 | ||
Nuclease-free H2O | x | ||
Total volume | 20 | 18+ (overnight) | 4 |
C)
Reagent | Volume for 1x reaction (μl) | Incubation Time (hr) | Incubation Temperature (°C) |
450 ng of Gag-MJ4 plasmid | x μl for 450 ng | ||
NEB CutSmart Buffer (previously NEB Buffer #4) | 2 | ||
NgoMIV restriction enzyme | 0.5 | ||
HpaI restriction enzyme | 0.5 | ||
Nuclease-free H2O | x | ||
Total volume | 20 | 2 | 37 |
Table 5. A) Restriction digest master mix and B) ligation reaction for generation of Gag-MJ4 chimeric provirus. C) Diagnostic restriction digest to ensure Gag-MJ4 cloning fidelity.
Primer Name | Nucleotide Sequence (5' – 3') |
GagInnerF1 | AGGCTAGAAGGAGAGAGATG |
GagF2 | GGGACATCAAGCAGCCAT |
For3 | CTAGGAAAAAGGGCTGTTGGAAATG |
GagR6 | CTGTATCATCTGCTCCTG |
Rev3 | GACAGGGCTATACATTCTTACTAT |
Rev1 | AATTTTTCCAGCTCCCTGCTTGCCCA |
Table 6. List of sequencing primers necessary to confirm 5’ LTR and gag sequence identity of Gag-MJ4 chimeric provirus.
Well A | 8 µl virus + 232 µl 1% FBS in DMEM |
Well B | 80 µl from Well A + 160 µl 1% FBS in DMEM |
Well C | 80 µl from Well B + 160 µl 1% FBS in DMEM |
Well D | 80 µl from Well C + 160 µl 1% FBS in DMEM |
Well E | 80 µl from Well D + 160 µl 1% FBS in DMEM |
Well F | 80 µl from Well E + 160 µl 1% FBS in DMEM |
Table 7. Dilution scheme (3-fold) for titering infectious viruses on TZM-bl cells.
A)
Reagent | Volume |
PBS without Ca2+ or Mg2+ | 500 ml |
Gluteraldehyde | 4 ml |
Formaldehyde | 11 ml |
*Note: Store at 4 °C.
B)
Reagent | Volume |
PBS without Ca2+ or Mg2+ | 4.75 ml |
Potassium ferricyanide (0.2 M) | 100 μl |
Potassium ferrocyanide (0.2 M) | 100 μl |
Magnesium chloride (1 M) | 20 μl |
X-gal (50 mg/ml) | 40 μl |
*Note: Make fresh and store away from light until use.
C.
Original Dilution well | A | B | C | D | E | F |
Volume of virus (µl) added to the wells of a 24-well plate row | 5 | 1.6667 | 0.5556 | 0.1852 | 0.06173 | 0.02057 |
Table 8. A) Staining and B) fixing solutions for titering of Gag-MJ4 chimeric viruses on the TZM-bl indicator cell line. C) The volume of virus added per well for calculating infectious units/µl.
Reagent | Volume |
Fetal bovine serum (FBS), defined | 55 ml |
Penicillin, Streptomycin, Glutamine (100x) | 6 ml |
HEPES buffer (1 M) | 6 ml |
Table 9. Recipe for complete RPMI medium for propagation of GXR25 cells.
Reagent | Volume (ml) |
Nuclease-free H2O | 419.5 |
Tris-Cl, pH 7.8 (1 M) | 30 |
Potassium chloride (1 M) | 37.5 |
Magnesium chloride (1 M) | 2.5 |
Nonidet P-40 (10%) | 5 |
EDTA (0.5 M) | 1.02 |
Polyadenylic acid, potassium salt (2 mg/ml) | 1.25 |
Oligo-dT primer (25 μg/ml) | 3.25 |
Total volume | 500 |
Table 10. Recipe for radiolabeled reverse-transcriptase assay master mix. *Note: Store as 1 ml aliquots at -20 °C.
Due to the length and technical nature of this protocol, there are several steps that are critical for both the successful construction of chimeric Gag-MJ4 plasmids as well as for quantification of viral replication capacity. Although the restriction enzyme based cloning strategy for the introduction of foreign gag genes into MJ4 outlined in this protocol has numerous advantages over previously used recombination based methods, the protocol can be technically challenging if critical steps are not followed precisely.
First, it is absolutely essential to use MJ4 plasmid DNA that has been generated in a competent bacterial strain lacking the dcm and dam DNA methylases. This is necessary as the enzymatic activity of the BclI restriction endonuclease, which is used to clone gag genes into the MJ4 backbone, is dam/dcm methylation sensitive. The JM110 and SCS110 (an endA negative JM110 derivative) E. coli strains are suitable for generating unmethylated MJ4 plasmid DNA. Additionally, for the excision of vector and insert bands, it is highly recommended that a blue light illuminator be used for visualization. This will reduce UV wavelength-dependent DNA damage and drastically increase cloning efficiency. If a blue light illuminator is unavailable, cloning efficiency can be maximized by visualizing DNA with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain instead of ethidium bromide and minimizing UV exposure time.
Finally, molecular cloning with large (>10kb) and/or retroviral plasmids such as MJ4 has traditionally been difficult for a variety of reasons. Large plasmids reduce transformation efficiency of competent bacterial strains42 while retroviral inserts, which contain long terminal repeat (LTR) sequences, reduce stability of the plasmid and compromise replication fidelity of the plasmid DNA within the bacterial host leading to deletions of the retroviral genome43. Bacteria transformed with MJ4 or Gag-MJ4 plasmid products must be grown at 30 °C rather than the traditional 37 °C for most protocols. Recovery steps after heat shock transformation, growth of transformed bacteria on agar plates, and growth of bacterial colonies in liquid culture should all be performed at 30 °C. This lower temperature reduces the growth rate of the bacteria and thus helps to ensure replication fidelity of the MJ4 plasmid. Additionally, replication of the MJ4 plasmid is more stable when using the JM109 E. coli strain over the DH5α strain, in our hands. Due to unstable nature of the plasmid, purified plasmid products should always be checked for correct plasmid size by restriction enzyme digestion; here, a double digest with the NgoMIV and HpaI restriction endonucleases at 37 °C for 2 hr.
Once successful generation of chimeric Gag-MJ4 plasmids has been accomplished, virus is generated via transfection of 293T cells, titered on an indicator cell line, TZM-bl cells, and replication capacity is measured using a CEM-based T cell line. The CEM-based GXR25 cell line used for these replication studies is one of the few established T cell lines able to support entry and replication of CCR5-tropic strains of HIV-1. This has been achieved by retroviral transduction to allow stable expression of human CCR537. This cell line naturally expresses CXCR4 and will support replication of CXCR4-tropic HIV-1, such as the laboratory-adapted strain NL4-3. However, in order to support efficient replication of CCR5-tropic strains, such as MJ4, the GXR25 cells must be propagated for no less than 4 months prior to infection. Properly passaged cultures can support replication even after passaging for up to 1 year. Careful monitoring of CCR5-tropic replication throughout passaging is essential for successful experiments.
As with any technique, there are limitations to the protocol that must be considered. Due to the location of restriction sites in the MJ4 plasmid as well as the availability of conserved restriction sites in naturally occurring HIV-1 isolates, the 3’ distal restriction site, BclI, is located 137 nucleotides from the gag stop codon. Although this generates a chimeric protease gene, this region is 96.5% conserved in this cohort, and we did not observe an abundance of dead or defective chimeric viruses.
One of the advantages of using the MJ4 subtype C infectious molecular clone with subtype C derived sequences is that it reduces the risk of suboptimal gene pairing between gag genes and backbone vectors of different subtypes. However, a certain amount of within-clade diversity exists as evidenced by the clustering of HIV-1 sequences by country or region even when found within the same subtype31. This could contribute to suboptimal pairing between the gag genes derived from acutely infected Zambians and the MJ4 infectious molecular clone backbone, which was derived from a chronically infected individual from Botswana38. However, a majority of the analyzed constructs produced infectious progeny virus. As different HIV-1 subtype C infectious molecular clones become more widely available, it will be important to further validate this system by cloning in these HIV-1 clade C gag genes into other backbones in order to ensure that there is a minimal bias introduced due to backbone incompatibilities.
The GXR25 cell line is a unique cell line, specifically due to its ability to support both CXCR4 and CCR5-tropic strains and its HIV-1 inducible GFP reporter37. However, some limitations exist and should be carefully considered before using this cell line for experiments adapted from this protocol. The GXR25 cell line does not appear to support entry of a majority of subtype C or A, CCR5-tropic, primary isolates we have tested. Additionally, the parent CEM cell line from which the GXR25 cell line was derived exhibits high levels of cyclophilin A, up to 2 to 4-fold higher expression than the Jurkat cell line44. Due to high levels of cyclophilin A, the replication defect normally associated with the canonical HLA-B*57 associated escape mutation, T242N, which is attributed to a decreased ability of capsid to bind cyclophilin A, cannot be easily detected in this particular cell line25. Thus the CEM-based GXR25 cell line is not ideal for studying replication defects associated with mutations in the HIV-1 capsid cyclophilin-binding loop.
Finally, while this protocol is ideal for analyzing the replication capacity of gag sequences derived from acute time points, modifications must be made in order to study the replication capacity of gag genes derived from chronically infected individuals. This protocol involves the amplification of population sequences from acute time points (median 45 days post estimated date of infection) when viral diversity is limited. The gag gene from each chimera is then sequenced and compared to the initial population PCR amplicon to ensure cloning fidelity. Due to limited sequence diversity at acute time points, cloning from population PCR products is possible. However, sequence diversity exists within the viral quasispecies of a chronically infected individual; therefore, in order to accurately assess the replication capacity of the chronic quasispecies, single genome amplification must be employed to capture several representative variants. Each of these variants must then be assayed for in vitro replication.
This technique has several broader applications, which stem from its advantages over existing methods. Since this process results in a clonal replication competent plasmid, it is simple to use constructs for additional mutagenesis studies, which can help to elucidate the contributions of specific residues to viral replication. Furthermore, by cloning in gag genes from longitudinal time points, one can assess the evolution of viral replication capacity over time and how these changes may affect pathogenesis in an HIV-1 infected individual.
This technique can be modified in order to expand its utility for different applications. Additional HIV-1 viral proteins can be engineered into the MJ4 plasmid in order to assess their effects on viral replication or their interactions with host proteins. This can be accomplished by engineering additional restrictions sites at desired regions in the genome through the introduction of silent nucleotide changes. However, special consideration must be taken when engineering novel restriction sites into the 3’ half of the HIV-1 genome as many accessory proteins are encoded in alternate reading frames, and silent changes in one protein could lead to amino acid substitutions in another. In this instance, restriction site independent cloning methods such as those discussed by Dudley et al.45 may overcome this limitation. Viral sequences derived from different populations may have varying ranges of replication capacities, and the MOI can be adjusted accordingly in order to capture the majority of viral isolates within their logarithmic phase of growth. Finally, the GXR25 cell line has been stably transfected with GFP under an LTR-driven, Tat-inducible promoter, and viral spread can be measured as a function of GFP positive cells via flow cytometry37 as an alternative to the RT assay described here or a traditional p24 ELISA.
In conclusion, this protocol provides an efficient and powerful technique for assessing HIV-1 viral replication as conferred by the gag gene, which encodes a conserved structural protein necessary for proper virion formation, budding, maturation, and disassembly46-48. Furthermore, this technique generates a replication competent clonal plasmid, which is ideal for mutagenesis studies and, thus, provides a method for elucidating the specific amino acid determinants of viral fitness. Studies such as these are imperative to enhance the understanding of how immune-driven viral evolution affects pathogenesis and disease progression in HIV-1 infected individuals.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The investigators thank all the volunteers in Zambia who participated in this study and all the staff at the Zambia Emory HIV Research Project in Lusaka who made this study possible. The investigators would like to thank Jon Allen, Smita Chavan, and Mackenzie Hurlston for technical assistance and sample management. We would also like to thank Dr. Mark Brockman for his discussions and generous donation of the GXR25 cells.
This study was funded by R01 AI64060 and R37 AI51231 (EH) and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. This work was made possible in part by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. This work also was supported, in part, by the Virology Core at the Emory Center for AIDS Research (Grant P30 AI050409). DC and JP were supported in part by Action Cycling Fellowships. This work was supported in part by the Yerkes National Primate Research Center base grant (2P51RR000165-51). This project was also funded in part by the National Center for Research Resources P51RR165 and is currently supported by the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD P51OD11132.
Name of the Reagent | Company | Catalogue number | Comments |
PCR reagents | |||
GOF: 5' ATTTGACTAGCGGAGGCTAGAA 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
VifOR: 5' TTCTACGGAGACTCCATGACCC 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
GagInnerF1: 5' AGGCTAGAAGGAGAGAGATG 3' |
IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
BclIDegRev2: 5' AGTATTTGATCATAYTGYYTYACTTTR 3' |
IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
MJ4For1b: 5' CGAAATCGGCAAAATCCC 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
MJ4Rev: 5' CCCATCTCTCTCCTTCTAGC 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
BclIRev: 5' TCTATAAGTATTTGATCATACTGTCTT 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
GagF2: 5' GGGACATCAAGCAGCCAT 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
For3: 5' CTAGGAAAAAGGGCTGTTGGAAATG 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
GagR6: 5' CTGTATCATCTGCTCCTG 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
Rev3: 5' GACAGGGCTATACATTCTTACTAT 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
Rev1: 5' AATTTTTCCAGCTCCCTGCTTGCCCA 3' | IDT DNA | Custom Oligo | 25nmol, standard desalt |
CoolRack PCR 96 XT | Biocision | BCS-529 | |
CoolRack M15 | Biocision | BCS-125 | |
Nuclease free water | Fisher | SH30538FS | Manufactured by Hyclone |
QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit | Qiagen | 52906 | |
Simport PCR 8 Strip Tubes, Blue (Flat Cap) | Daigger | EF3647BX | |
SuperScript III one-step RT-PCR system | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 12574035 | |
Phusion Hot-start II DNA polymerase | Fisher | F-549L | |
PCR Nucleotide Mix | Roche | 4638956001 | |
Agarose, high gel strength | Fisher | 50-213-128 | |
TAE 10X | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | AM9869 | |
Promega 1kb DNA ladder | Fisher | PRG5711 | Manufactured by Promega |
Sybr Safe DNA Gel Stain, 10000x | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | S33102 | |
Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System | Promega | A9282 | |
Razor blades, single-edged | Fisher | 12-640 | Manufactured by Surgical Design |
Thermocycler, PTC-200 | MJ Research | ||
Microbiology & Cloning reagents | |||
LB Agar, Miller | Fisher | BP1425-2 | |
LB Broth, Lennox | Fisher | BP1427-2 | |
Sterile 100mm x 15mm polystyrene petri dishes | Fisher | 08-757-12 | |
Ampicillin sodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | A9518-5G | |
Falcon 14ml Polypropylene round-bottom tubes | BD Biosciences | 352059 | |
NgoMIV restriction endonuclease | New England BioLabs | R0564L | |
BclI restriction endonuclease | New England BioLabs | R0160L | |
HpaI restriction endonuclease | New England BioLabs | R0105L | |
T4 DNA Ligase, 5U/μL | Roche | 10799009001 | |
JM109 competent cells, >10^8 cfu/μg | Promega | L2001 | |
PureYield plasmid miniprep system | Promega | A1222 | |
Safe Imager 2.0 Blue Light Transilluminator | Invitrogen | G6600 | |
Microfuge 18 centrifuge | Beckman Coulter | 367160 | |
Cell culture reagents | |||
Amphyl cleaner/disinfectant | Fisher | 22-030-394 | |
Fugene HD, 1 mL | VWR | PAE2311 | Manufactured by Promega |
Hexadimethrine bromide (Polybrene) | Sigma-Aldrich | H9268-5G | |
Costar Plates, 6-well, flat | Fisher | 07-200-83 | Manufactured by Corning Life |
Costar Plates, 24-well, flat | Fisher | 07-200-84 | Manufactured by Corning Life |
Costar Plates, 96-well, round | Fisher | 07-200-95 | Manufactured by Corning Life |
Flasks, Corning filter top/canted neck, 75 cm^2 | Fisher | 10-126-37 | |
Flasks, Corning filter top/canted neck, 150 cm^2 | Fisher | 10-126-34 | Manufactured by Corning Life |
Conical Tubes, 50ml, blue cap | Fisher | 14-432-22 | Manufactured by BD Biosciences |
Conical Tubes, 15ml, blue cap | Fisher | 14-959-70C | Manufactured by BD Biosciences |
Trypsin-EDTA | Fisher | MT25052CI | Manufactured by Mediatech |
RPMI, 500 ml | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 11875-119 | |
DMEM, 500 ml | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 11965-118 | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin/Glutamine, 100X | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 10378-016 | |
PBS with magnesium and calcium, 500ml | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 14040-133 | |
PBS without magnesium and calcium | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 20012-050 | |
Sarstedt tubes, assorted colors | Sarstedt | 72.694.996 | |
Reservoir Trays for Multichannel, 55ml | Fisher | 13-681-501 | |
DEAE-Dextran | Fisher | NC9691007 | |
Corning 96 well clear V bottom tissue culture treated microplate | Fisher | 07-200-96 | Manufactured by Corning Life |
HEPES, 1M Buffer Solution | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 15630-080 | |
FBS, Defined, 500 ml | Fisher | SH30070 03 | |
X-gal | VWR | PAV3941 | Manufactured by Promega |
Glutaraldehyde, Grade II, 25% in H2O | Sigma-Aldrich | G6257-100ML | |
1M Magnesium chloride solution | Sigma-Aldrich | M1028-100ML | |
Formaldehyde solution, for molecular biology, 36.5% | Sigma-Aldrich | F8775-500ML | |
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) trihydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | P9387-100G | |
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) | Sigma-Aldrich | P8131-100G | |
Allegra X15-R centrifuge | Beckman Coulter | 392932 | |
TC10 automated cell counter | Bio-Rad | 1450001 | |
VistaVision inverted microscope | VWR | ||
Reverse-Transcriptase Quantification Assay reagents | |||
dTTP, [α-33P]- 3000Ci/mmol, 10mCi/ml, 1 mCi | Perkin-Elmer | NEG605H001MC | |
1M Tris-Cl, pH 8.0 | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 15568025 | Must be adjusted to pH 7.8 with KOH |
2M potassium chloride (KCl) | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | AM9640G | Adjust to 1M solution |
0.5M EDTA | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 15575-020 | |
Nonidet P40 | Roche | 11333941103 | |
Polyadenylic acid (Poly rA) potassium salt | Midland Reagent Co. | P-3001 | |
Oligo d(T) primer | Life Technologies/Invitrogen | 18418-012 | |
Dithiothreitol (DTT) | Sigma-Aldrich | 43815-1G | |
SR, Super Resolution Phosphor Screen, Small | Perkin-Elmer | 7001485 | |
Corning Costar Thermowell 96 well plate model (M) Polycarbonate | Fisher | 07-200-245 | Manufactured by Corning Life |
Corning 96 Well Microplate Aluminum Sealing Tape, Nonsterile | Fisher | 07-200-684 | Manufactured by Corning Life |
DE-81 anion exchange paper | Whatman | 3658-915 | |
Trisodium citrate dihydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | S1804-1KG | |
Sodium Chloride | Fisher | S671-3 | |
Autoradiography cassette | Fisher | FB-CA-810 | |
Cyclone storage phoshpor screen | Packard |