This article describes the application of untargeted metabolomics, transcriptomics and multivariate statistical analysis to grape berry transcripts and metabolites in order to gain insight into the terroir concept, i.e., the impact of the environment on berry quality traits.
Terroir refers to the combination of environmental factors that affect the characteristics of crops such as grapevine (Vitis vinifera) according to particular habitats and management practices. This article shows how certain terroir signatures can be detected in the berry metabolome and transcriptome of the grapevine cultivar Corvina using multivariate statistical analysis. The method first requires an appropriate sampling plan. In this case study, a specific clone of the Corvina cultivar was selected to minimize genetic differences, and samples were collected from seven vineyards representing three different macro-zones during three different growing seasons. An untargeted LC-MS metabolomics approach is recommended due to its high sensitivity, accompanied by efficient data processing using MZmine software and a metabolite identification strategy based on fragmentation tree analysis. Comprehensive transcriptome analysis can be achieved using microarrays containing probes covering ~99% of all predicted grapevine genes, allowing the simultaneous analysis of all differentially expressed genes in the context of different terroirs. Finally, multivariate data analysis based on projection methods can be used to overcome the strong vintage-specific effect, allowing the metabolomics and transcriptomics data to be integrated and analyzed in detail to identify informative correlations.
Large-scale data analysis based on the genomes, transcriptomes, proteomes and metabolomes of plants provides unprecedented insight into the behavior of complex systems, such as the terroir characteristics of wine which reflect the interactions between grapevine plants and their environment. Because the terroir of a wine can be distinct even when identical grapevine clones are grown in different vineyards, genomics analysis is of little use because the clonal genomes are identical. Instead it is necessary to look at correlations between gene expression and the metabolic properties of the berries, which determine the quality traits of wine. The analysis of gene expression at the level of the transcriptome benefits from the similar chemical properties of all transcripts, which facilitates quantitative analysis by exploiting universal characteristics such as hybridization to immobilized probes on microarrays. In contrast, universal analytical methods in proteomics and metabolomics are more challenging because of the huge physical and chemical diversity of individual proteins and metabolites. In the case of metabolomics this diversity is even more extreme because individual metabolites differ vastly in size, polarity, abundance and volatility, so no single extraction process or analytical method offers a holistic approach.
Among the analytical platforms suitable for non-volatile metabolites, those based on high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) are much more sensitive than alternatives such as HPLC with ultraviolet or diode array detectors (HPLC-UV, HPLC-DAD) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, but quantitative analysis by HPLC-MS can be influenced by phenomena such as the matrix effect and ion suppression/enhancement1-3. The investigation of such effects during the analysis of Corvina grape berries by HPLC-MS using an electrospray ionization source (HPLC-ESI-MS), showed that sugars and other molecules with the lowest retention times were strongly underreported, probably also reflecting the large number of molecules in this zone, and that the abundance of other molecules could be underestimated, overestimated or unaffected by the matrix effect, but the data normalization for the matrix effect seemed to have limited impact on the overall results4,5. The method described herein is optimized for the analysis of medium-polarity metabolites that accumulate at high levels in grape berries during ripening, and which are significantly impacted by the terroir. They include anthocyanins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, procyanidins, other flavonoids, resveratrol, stilbenes, hydroxycinnamic acids and hydroxybenzoic acids, which together determine the color, taste and health-related properties of wines. Other metabolites, such as sugars and aliphatic organic acids, are ignored because quantitation by HPLC-MS is unreliable due to the matrix effect and ion suppression phenomena5. Within the polarity range selected by this method, the approach is untargeted in that it aims to detect as many different metabolites as possible6.
Transcriptomics methods that allow thousands of grapevine transcripts to be monitored simultaneously are facilitated by the availability of the complete grapevine genome sequence7,8. Early transcriptomics methods based on high-throughput cDNA sequencing have evolved with the advent of next-generation sequencing into a collection of procedures collectively described as RNA-Seq technology. This approach is rapidly becoming the method of choice for transcriptomics studies. However, a large body of literature based on microarray, which allow thousands of transcripts to be quantified in parallel by hybridization, has accumulated for grapevine. Indeed, before RNA-Seq became a mainstream technology, many dedicated commercial microarray platforms had been developed allowing grapevine transcriptome to be inspected in great detail. Among the vast variety of platforms, only two allowed genome-wide transcriptome analysis9. The most evolved array allowed the hybridization of up to 12 independent samples on a single device, thus reducing the costs of each experiment. The 12 sub-arrays each comprised 135,000 60-mer probes representing 29,549 grapevine transcripts. This device has been used in a large number of studies10-24. These two platforms have now been discontinued but a new custom microarray has recently been designed and represents a more recent development as it contains an even greater number of probes representing additional newly discovered grapevine genes25.
The large-sale datasets produced by transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis require suitable statistical methods for data analysis, including multivariate techniques to determine correlations between different forms of data. The most widely used multivariate techniques are those based on projection, and these can be unsupervised, such as principal component analysis (PCA), or supervised, such as bidirectional orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis (O2PLS-DA)26. The protocol presented in this article utilizes PCA for exploratory data analysis and O2PLS-DA to identify differences between groups of samples.
1. Select Appropriate Materials and Construct a Sampling Plan
AM | BA | BM | CS | FA | MN | PM | |
Macro-zone | Soave | Lake Garda | Valpolicella | Lake Garda | Valpolicella | Valpolicella | Soave |
Height (m) | 250 | 120 | 450 | 100 | 130 | 250 | 130 |
Rootstock | 41B | S04 | K5BB | 420A | 420A | K5BB | 41B |
Row direction | E-W | N-S | E-W | E-W | E-W | N-S | N-S |
Training system | Overhead System (Pergola) | Overhead System (Pergola) | Vertical Shoot Positioning (Guyot) | Overhead System (Pergola) | Overhead System (Pergola) | Vertical Shoot Positioning (Guyot) | Vertical Shoot Positioning (Guyot) |
Soil type | Silty clay | Loam | Clay | Loam | Clay Loam | Silt loam | Clay loam |
Planting layout (m) | 3.20 x 1.00 | 4.50 x 0.80 | 4.00 x 1.25 | 3.50 x 1.20 | 3.50 x 0.75 | 2.80 x 1.00 | 1.80 x 0.80 |
Total lime % | 3.9 | 19.3 | 18.3 | 14.4 | 31 | 5.9 | 27.9 |
Active lime % | 0.5 | 2.6 | 9.4 | 6.3 | 11.3 | 3.1 | 8.3 |
Sand % | 15 | 47 | 66 | 42 | 29 | 13 | 36 |
Loam % | 43 | 36 | 21 | 37 | 39 | 67 | 36 |
Clay % | 42 | 17 | 13 | 21 | 32 | 20 | 28 |
Soil pH | 8.3 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 7.8 | 7.9 |
Organic substance (%) | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 2.5 |
Exchangeable phosphorus (mg/kg) | 26 | 73 | 73 | 68 | 48 | 47 | 64 |
Exchangeable potassium (mg/kg) | 190 | 376 | 620 | 230 | 168 | 154 | 126 |
Exchangeable magnesium (mg/kg) | 272 | 468 | 848 | 623 | 294 | 293 | 183 |
Exchangeable calcium (mg/kg) | 6500 | 5380 | 7358 | 6346 | 4652 | 10055 | 2878 |
Berry Reducing Sugars 2006 | 211.25 ± 1.20 | 176.20 ± 0.42 | 187.40 ± 0.00 | 203.70 ± 1.13 | 212.55 ± 0.64 | 195.20 ± 0.00 | 211.65 ± 0.64 |
Berry Reducing Sugars 2007 | 190.00 ± 1.27 | 165.25 ± 0.49 | 153.00 ± 0.42 | 203.60 ± 0.71 | 210.90 ± 0.71 | 192.25 ± 0.64 | 188.70 ± 1.84 |
Berry Reducing Sugars 2008 | 191.35 ± 0.64 | 178.90 ± 0.57 | 170.05 ± 0.49 | 205.15 ± 1.48 | 188.70 ± 0.57 | 169.35± 0.49 | 108.05 ± 1.06 |
Berry pH 2006 | 3.01 ± 0.01 | 2.96 ± 0.01 | 2.84 ± 0.00 | 2.9 ± 0.00 | 2.98 ± 0.00 | 3.02 ± 0.00 | 3.06 ± 0.01 |
Berry pH 2007 | 2.97 ± 0.00 | 3.00 ± 0.00 | 2.74 ± 0.00 | 3.07 ± 0.01 | 2.98 ± 0.00 | 2.87 ± 0.01 | 3.09 ± 0.00 |
Berry pH 2008 | 2.83 ± 0.00 | 3.04 ± 0.01 | 2.71 ± 0.00 | 2.98 ± 0.01 | 2.98 ± 0.00 | 2.82 ± 0.00 | 3.11 ± 0.00 |
Harvesting Date | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | ||||
Veraison | 8-Aug | 18-Jul | 12-Aug | ||||
Mid Ripening | 4-Sep | 8-Aug | 2-Sep | ||||
Ripe | 18-Sep | 29-Aug | 23-Sep |
Table 1: Principal features of each vineyard and sample collection dates. m = meters, E-W = Eat-West, N-S = North-South.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the sampling procedure. The three wine production macro-zones are located in the surroundings of the city of Verona, Veneto region, Italy. The three time points are veraison (V) representing the onset of ripening in viticulture, mid-ripening (MR) and ripe berries (R). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Prepare Berry Powder Extracts, Analyze the Metabolites and Process the Data
Mass spectrometer components | Function | Parameters |
Electrospray Ionization Source | Nebulizing Gas | 50 psi, 350 °C |
Drying gas | 10 L min-1 | |
Ion trap and detector | Scan | Full scan mode, 13,000 m/z per second, range 50-1,500 m/z |
Target mass | 400 m/z | |
Collision Gas | Helium | |
Vacuum pressure | 1.4 x 10-5 mbar | |
Capillary source | +4,000 V | |
End plate offset | -500 V | |
Skimmer | -40 V | |
Cap exit | -121 V | |
Oct 1 DC | -12 V | |
Oct 2 DC | -1.7 V | |
Lens 1 | +5 V | |
Lens 2 | +60 V | |
ICC for positive ionization mode | 20.000 | |
ICC for negative ionization mode | 7,000 |
Table 2: Principal parameter set for acquiring mass spectra.
Operation | Selection | Function | Parameters | Values |
Peak Detection | Mass detection | Centroid | Noise level | 3,500 |
Chromatogram builder | Highest data point | min time span | 0.15 | |
min height | 4,000 | |||
m/z tolerance | 0.3 | |||
Peak Detection | Peak deconvolution | Local minimum search | Chromatographic threshold | 70 |
Search minimum in RT range (min) | 0:50 | |||
Minimum relative height | 15% | |||
Minimum absolute height | 4,000 | |||
Min ratio of peak top/edge | 2 | |||
Duration range (min) | 0-10 | |||
Isotopes | Isotopic peaks grouper | - | m/z tolerance | 1.2 |
RT tolerance | 0:50 | |||
monotonic shape | No | |||
Maximum charge | 3 | |||
Representative isotope | No | |||
Alignment | Join aligner | - | m/z tolerance | 1.2 |
Weight for m/z | 10 | |||
Retention time tolerance | 0:50 | |||
Weight for RT | 5 | |||
Require same charge state | No | |||
Require same ID | No | |||
Compare isotope pattern | No | |||
Gap filling | Peak finder | - | Intensity tolerance | 20% |
m/z tolerance | 0.9 | |||
Retention time tolerance | 0:40 | |||
RT correction | No | |||
Filtering | Duplicate Peak filter | - | m/z tolerance | 1.2 |
RT tolerance | 0:30 | |||
Require same identification | No |
Table 3: Mzmine workflow with specific values to process negative LC-MS grape berry data files.
3. Prepare Berry Powder Extracts for Transcriptome Analysis and Process the Data
Metric Name | Upper Limit | Lower Limit | Description |
AnyColorPrcntFeatNonUnif | 1.00 | NA | Percentage of features that are feature non-uniformity outliers in either channel |
DetectionLimit | 2.00 | 0.10 | Average plus 1 standard deviation of the spike ins below the linear concentration range |
absGE1E1aSlope | 1.20 | 0.90 | Absolute of slope of fit for Signal vs. Concentration of E1a probes |
MedCVProcSignal | 8.00 | NA | Median %CV for the Processed Signal |
gNegCtrlAveBGSubSig | 5.00 | -10.00 | Average of background subtracted signal of all inlier negative controls (BGSubSignal is calculated by substracting a value called BGUsed from the feature mean signal) |
gNegCtrlAveNetSig | 40.00 | NA | Average of net signal of all inlier negative controls |
gNegCtrlSDevBGSubSig | 10.00 | NA | Standard deviation of background subtracted signals of all inlier negative controls |
gNonCntrlMedCVProcSignal | 8.00 | NA | Median %CV for the Processed Signal of the non-control probes |
gSpatialDetrendRMSFilter | 15.00 | NA | Residual of background detrending fit |
Table 4: Principal parameters to be checked to verify the quality of microarray hybridization.
4. Carry Out the Detailed Statistical Analysis of the Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Data
The case study described in this article yielded a final data matrix comprising 552 signals (m/z features) including molecular ions plus their isotopes, adducts and some fragments, relatively quantified among 189 samples (7 vineyards x 3 ripening stages x 3 growing seasons x 3 biological replicates). The total number for data points was therefore 104,328. Fragmentation tree analysis resulted in the annotation of 282 m/z features, corresponding to metabolites plus adducts, isotopes and fragments. Exploratory analysis of the whole data matrix by PCA showed that samples clustered according to the ripening stage (veraison, mid-ripening and ripe) along the first and second principal components (t1-t2, Figure 2A), and according to the growing season along the third principal component (t1-t3, Figure 2B).
Figure 2: PCA of the whole metabolomics data matrix. Unsupervised PCA-X score scatter plots showing the clustering of grapevine samples collected during three different growing seasons (2006, 2007, and 2008) and ripening stages (veraison, mid-ripening and ripe berries). In the first plot (A) the samples clustered according to the ripening stages, whereas in the second (B) they clustered according to the growing season. The colors highlight the ripening stages as green (veraison), pink (mid-ripening) and purple (ripe berries). The symbols represent the growing seasons: circles (2006), squares (2007) and triangles (2008).Component t1: Q2: 0.34; R2X: 0.331; Q2cum: 0.304; Component t2: Q2: 0.185; R2X: 0.155; Q2cum: 0.433; Component t3: Q2: 0.145; R2X: 0.0924; Q2cum: 0.515. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The unsupervised PCA was unable to reveal specific terroir features, which are hidden under the prevalent vintage effects, so a supervised O2PLS-DA approach was applied to two separate datasets, i.e., berries at veraison and fully ripe berries. This allows the exploration of metabolic differences representing the three macro-zones (Lake Garda, Valpolicella and Soave) in two key stages of ripening, to identify specific terroir signatures representing these zones at these ripening stages.
Figure 3: O2PLS-DA of veraison and ripe grape berries. O2PLS-DA score scatter plots showing the clustering of grapevine samples collected in the Lake Garda (blue), Soave (green) and Valpolicella (pink) macro-zones at veraison (A) and when the berries were ripe (B). The metabolites responsible for the clustering observed in (A) and (B) are visible in correlation loading plots (C) and (D) respectively. Groups of metabolites, represented as triangles, are blue for resveratrol and stilbenes, pink for anthocyanins, green for hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids, purple for flavan-3-ols/procyanidins, and yellow for other flavonoids. A: component P1: Q2: 0.278; R2X: 0.0529; Q2cum: 0.278; component P2: Q2: 0.33; R2X: 0.0394; Q2cum: 0.608. B: component P1: Q2: 0.353; R2X: 0.0639; Q2cum: 0.353; component P2: Q2: 0.188; R2X: 0.0374; Q2cum: 0.541. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Distribution of metabolic markers among the three macro-zones: Lake Garda, Soave, and Valpolicella. Metabolite levels reflect the mean ± standard error (n = 18 for Garda and Soave, 27 for Valpolicella macro-zone) of different glycosylated and acylated anthocyanins, resveratrol/stilbenes and flavonoids in ripe Corvina berries in the three different growing seasons (2006, 2007, and 2008). Different letters represent groups that were significantly different as determined by a t-test (p <0.05). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The specific signatures of the seven individual vineyards were identified using a specialized statistical approach10. Two O2PLS-DA models were built, one exploring the differences between the berries grown in the three macro-zones at veraison, and the other exploring the differences in the three macro-zones among mature berries. The models were cross-validated using a permutation test (200 permutations) showing that the model describing the mature berries across the three macro-zones was valid, whereas only the Lake Garda samples were distinct from the other samples at veraison (not shown).
The score plots of the two models, which demonstrate how the samples from the three macro-zones at veraison and maturity are separated according to the distribution of metabolites, are shown in Figures 3A and 3B. The loading plots of these model expressed as pq(corr), i.e., the correlation between p (the class of samples) and q (the metabolites), are shown in Figures 3C and 3D. In the loading plots, the red squares represent the class of samples (macro-zones) and the colored triangles represent the individual metabolites. The distance between the metabolites and the samples reflects their relationships. The metabolites are color-coded according to their chemical class.
Given the low statistical validity of the veraison model as shown by permutation test, it is likely to suffer from overfitting. Therefore, the following observations refer solely to the mature berry samples, whose model was statistically valid. In the loading plot shown in Figure 3D, the stilbenes are shifted towards the Lake Garda macro-zone, whereas the flavonoids are shifted towards the Soave and Valpolicella macro-zones. A closer look at individual metabolites reveals the asymmetric distribution of anthocyanins, with peonidin and its derivatives more prevalent in the Lake Garda macro-zone and other anthocyanins more prevalent in the Valpolicella macro-zone (Figure 4). Simple anthocyanin-3-O-glucosides are more prevalent in the Valpolicella macro-zone whereas acylated and coumarated derivatives are more prevalent in the Soave macro-zone.
The transcriptomics component of this case study was originally out using a transcriptomics platform that is no longer supported. As a consequence, we set up an alternative procedure, with the still available platform; the new platform contains more probes than the old one, including 249 more Pinot noir predicted transcripts, 4392 newly identified Pinot loci and 179 Corvina private genes25.
This article describes the metabolomics, transcriptomics and statistical analysis protocols used to interpret the grape berry terroir concept. Metabolomics analysis by HPLC-ESI-MS is sensitive enough to detect large numbers of metabolites simultaneously, but relative quantitation is affected by the matrix effect and ion suppression/enhancement. However, a similar approach has already been used to describe the ripening and post-harvest withering of Corvina berries, and the correction of matrix effects had a limited impact on the results5. Furthermore, a recent large-scale multi-instrument inter-laboratory study to determine the comparative robustness of NMR and LC-MS for untargeted metabolomics using the same samples revealed that the different instruments and technologies yielded consistent results6. The case study described herein involved the collection and analysis of samples at three ripening stages from seven vineyards in three macro-zones over three growing seasons. Herein, the terroir signature was investigated at the macro-zone level (Lake Garda and Soave, each represented by two vineyards, and Valpolicella, represented by three vineyards) using PCA and O2PLS-DA multivariate statistics. The differences among individual vineyards are more subtle and require more sophisticated and sensitive statistical approaches10. Various steps of the proposed protocols are critical and have to be considered in order to successfully answer to the biological questions about terroir influences on grape quality.
First of all, the appropriate sampling plan is critical: the choice of one specific clone to minimize the genetic differences and the multiple-year duration of the sampling allows to highlight the real, sound differences between the various terroirs. On the other side, the proposed research was performed within a terroir that is particularly suitable for viticulture, and this could minimize the terroir-differences on grape quality. Thus, it would be very interesting to compare the same cultivar grown in a less optimal zone but, obviously, these vineyards could simply be not available.
From the technical point of view, a highly reproducible metabolite separation through HPLC is critical to obtain good data matrix, since the higher the differences in retention time in the various analyses, the higher the number of mistakes in peak alignment in the final dataset. Thus, it is of critical importance to set an appropriate re-equilibration time, to divide the samples into batches of 9-10 samples with cycles of chromatographic column cleaning between them and to use blank samples as the first sample of each batch. LC-MS is affected by a certain degree of instability, which may result in differences between samples that are instrument-driven. This problem can be partially solved by the randomization of sample analysis, as shown in this paper. An improvement of the method is the use of appropriate quality control samples in each batch, that can inform on the platform state. An appropriate standard compound mix (i.e., standard compounds with m/z values and retention times spanning over the whole m/z and retention time range) and a new control sample obtained by mixing equal parts of powder from all the samples can inform about platform effects and also eventually be used for a-posteriori data normalization.
Another important point in order to compare metabolomics and transcriptomics results was to use exactly the same material (i.e., the same crushed samples) for both the analyses. In the data analysis, it is critical to use an appropriate statistics method, such as OPLS-DA, which allows easy interpretation of the differences in terms of gene expression and metabolite accumulation with respect to methods such as PCA. One of the major limitations of this kind of approach is the absence of strong methods for transcriptomics and metabolomics data integration. The development of suitable methods for different types of data correlation is necessary in order to build a strong and reliable correlation between transcriptomics and metabolomics data.
The techniques described in this article clearly revealed the ripening and vintage effects on the berry metabolome, but specific chemical signatures representing the three macro-zones were also identified in ripe berries underneath the prevalent vintage effect. Interestingly, the analysis of veraison berries did not yield a statistically valid model, indicating that the terroir concept is predominantly manifested by metabolites that accumulate during ripening (e.g., anthocyanins and stilbenes) than those already present in the immature berries.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work benefited from the networking activities coordinated within the EU-funded COST ACTION FA1106 “An integrated systems approach to determine the developmental mechanisms controlling fleshy fruit quality in tomato and grapevine”. This work was supported by the ‘Completamento del Centro di Genomica Funzionale Vegetale’ project funded by the CARIVERONA Bank Foundation and by the ‘Valorizzazione dei Principali Vitigni Autoctoni Italiani e dei loro Terroir (Vigneto)’ project funded by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural and Forestry Policies. SDS was financed by the Italian Ministry of University and Research FIRB RBFR13GHC5 project “The Epigenomic Plasticity of Grapevine in Genotype per Environment Interactions”.
Mill Grinder | IKA | IKA A11 basic | |
HPLC Autosampler | Beckman Coulter | - | System Gold 508 Autosampler |
HPLC System | Beckman Coulter | - | System Gold 127 Solvent Module HPLC |
C18 Guard Column | Grace | - | Alltima HP C18 (7.5×2.1mm; 5μm) Guard Column |
C18 Column | Grace | - | Alltima HP C18 (150×2.1mm; 3μm) Column |
Mass Spectometer | Bruker Daltonics | - | Bruker Esquire 6000; The mass spectometer was equipped with an ESI source and the analyzer was an ion trap. |
Extraction solvents and HPLC buffers | Sigma | 34966 | Methanol LC-MS grade |
Sigma | 94318 | Formic acid LC-MS grade | |
Sigma | 34967 | Acetonitrile LC-MS grade | |
Sigma | 39253 | Water LC-MS grade | |
Minisart RC 4 Syringe filters (0.2 μm) | Sartorius | 17764 | |
Softwares for data collection (a) and processing (b) | Bruker Daltonics | – | Bruker Daltonics Esquire 5.2 Control (a); Esquire 3.2 Data Analysis and MzMine 2.2 softwares (b) |
Spectrum Plant Total RNA kit | Sigma-Aldrich | STRN250-1KT | For total RNA extractino from grape pericarps |
Nanodrop 1000 | Thermo Scientific | 1000 | |
BioAnalyzer 2100 | Agilent Technologies | G2939A | |
RNA 6000 Nano Reagents | Agilent Technologies | 5067-1511 | |
RNA Chips | Agilent Technologies | 5067-1511 | |
Agilent Gene Expression Wash Buffer 1 | Agilent Technologies | 5188-5325 | |
Agilent Gene Expression Wash Buffer 2 | Agilent Technologies | 5188-5326 | |
LowInput QuickAmp Labeling kit One-Color | Agilent Technologies | 5190-2305 | |
Kit RNA Spike In – One-Color | Agilent Technologies | 5188-5282 | |
Gene Expression Hybridization Kit | Agilent Technologies | 5188-5242 | |
RNeasy Mini Kit (50) | Qiagen | 74104 | For cRNA Purification |
Agilent SurePrint HD 4X44K 60-mer Microarray | Agilent Technologies | G2514F-048771 | |
eArray | Agilent Technologies | – | https://earray.chem.agilent.com/earray/ |
Gasket slides | Agilent Technologies | G2534-60012 | Enable Agilent SurePrint Microarray 4-array Hybridization |
Thermostatic bath | Julabo | – | |
Hybridization Chamber | Agilent Technologies | G2534-60001 | |
Microarray Hybridization Oven | Agilent Technologies | G2545A | |
Hybridization Oven Rotator Rack | Agilent Technologies | G2530-60029 | |
Rotator Rack Conversion Rod | Agilent Technologies | G2530-60030 | |
Staining kit | Bio-Optica | 10-2000 | Slide-staining dish and Slide rack |
Magnetic stirrer device | AREX Heating Magnetic Stirrer | F20540163 | |
Thermostatic Oven | Thermo Scientific | Heraeus – 6030 | |
Agilent Microarray Scanner | Agilent Technologies | G2565CA | |
Scanner Carousel, 48-position | Agilent Technologies | G2505-60502 | |
Slide Holders | Agilent Technologies | G2505-60525 | |
Feature extraction software v11.5 | Agilent Technologies | – | inside the Agilent Microarray Scanner G2565CA |
SIMCA + V13 Software | Umetrics |