This report provides a new sample preparation procedure for visualizing neuromuscular junctions in Drosophila Larvae. This method is more effective in preventing the curling of the samples compared to the traditional method and is particularly useful for Drosophila neuromuscular junction ultrastructural analysis.
The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) has emerged as a valuable model system in the field of neuroscience. The application of confocal microscopy at the Drosophila NMJ enables researchers to acquire synaptic information, encompassing both quantitative data on synapse abundance and detailed insights into their morphology. However, the diffuse distribution and limited visual range of the TEM present challenges for the ultrastructural analysis. This study introduces an innovative and efficient sample preparation method that surpasses the conventional approach. The procedure begins by placing a metal mesh at the base of a flat-bottomed bottle or test tube, followed by positioning fixed larvae samples onto the mesh. An additional mesh is placed over the samples, ensuring that they are positioned between the two meshes. The fixed samples are thoroughly dehydrated and infiltrated before proceeding with the embedding procedure. Then embedding of the samples in epoxy resin is performed in a flat sheet manner, which allows for the preparation of muscles for positioning and sectioning. Benefiting from these steps, all the muscles of Drosophila larvae can be visualized under light microscopy, therey facilitating subsequent positioning and sectioning. Excess resin is removed after locating the 6th and 7th muscles of body segments A2 and A3. Serial ultra-thin sectioning of the 6th or 7th muscle is performed.
Electron microscopy is one of the most ideal methods for studying the ultrastructure of biological materials that can visually and accurately demonstrate the internal structure of cells at the nanoscale level1. However, due to the complexity of the sample preparation process and the high cost, electron microscopy is not as popular as light microscopy. Recent advancements in electron microscopy techniques have led to significant improvements in image quality, coinciding with a remarkable reduction in the associated workload. Consequently, electron microscopy has assumed an important role in advancing scientific knowledge in diverse fields2.
Drosophila is an excellent animal model for performing genetic manipulations to precisely control the spatial and temporal expression of target genes3. Besides, Drosophila has the advantages of a short growth period and easy rearing compared to mammalian models; therefore, Drosophila is widely used in morphology research4,5.
In Drosophila larvae, neuromuscular junction (NMJ) boutons are widely distributed in the muscles6,7, and immunostaining of NMJ can easily provide information on synapse quantity and morphology8,9 . The NMJ boutons located in the 6th/7th muscles of the A2 and A3 segments are well suited for quantitative and morphological research using light microscopy. This is because of their size and abundance10,11. Therefore, Drosophila larvae NMJs are considered a useful model for neuroscience research12.
However, it is challenging to observe the NMJ bouton ultrastructure by the TEM. Since the scan window of transmission electron microscopy is narrow, it is hard to position the widely distributed NMJ boutons13. The other reason is that the Drosophila body wall is susceptible to curling during the alcohol dehydration step of the sample preparation protocol7.
Traditional studies have usually chosen boutons between the 6th and 7th muscles of the A2 and A3 segments as sample materials because of their abundance and size14,15. The 6th and 7th muscles of the A2 and A3 segments are bigger than the other muscles and contain more boutons. However, when samples were prepared for electron microscopy, fixed samples tended to become thin and prone to curling, thereby leading to improper positioning of the 6th and 7th muscles of the A2 and A3 segments.
We hereby report a new processing procedure that is more effective in preventing the curling of the samples compared to the traditional method of sample preparation7,16, by allowing the samples to stay flat during the subsequent dehydration, thereby facilitating better positioning of the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junctions.
NOTE: The transmission electron microscopy sample preparation method used in this article has been reported previously16. It is important to note that the selection of reagents and the adjustment of dosage are necessary depending on the sample. There are many toxic chemical reagents used in the sample preparation process, therefore, the operator needs to take certain protective measures, such as wearing protective clothing and gloves and operating in a fume hood.
1. Dissection, fixation and placement procedure
2. Dehydration
NOTE In this paper, the ethanol gradient dehydration method was used.
3. Infiltration
NOTE: Infiltration is one of the necessary steps for the TEM sample preparation. Infiltration allows for the gradual replacement of dehydrating medium with the embedding medium in the sample to allow filling of the cell interstice with the embedding medium19.
4. Embedding
5. Sectioning procedure
The Drosophila larva body wall is composed of 30 identifiable muscle fibers arranged in a regular pattern and looks like a thin slice after dissection and fixation21(Figure 1A). The sample remains flat during the dehydration process due to the presence of the metal meshes (Figure 1B, C). The larval body muscle is buried in a thin plate made of epoxy resin (Figure 1D–G), which is easily and accurately positioned and glued to the resin-filled capsule (Figure 1H, I).
Figure 1: Schematics of TEM sample preparation of Drosophila larva body wall. (A) Samples made after dissecting, fixing, and rinsing of Drosophila larva. The sample is placed in (B, B') a flat-bottomed test tube and (C) is dehydrated and infiltrated while being sandwiched between two metal meshes. The sample is transferred into (D, E) a pre-made polyethylene embedding plate, (F) in which it is embedded and polymerized. (G) After initial engraving of the sample, thereby removing excess resin, (H, I) the engraved sample is glued to a resin-filled capsule. Scale bar, A: 4 mm; B': 2.5 cm; D-G: 2 mm; H, I: 3 mm. This figure has been modified from Guangming, et al.16. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
As the neuromuscular junction is located in the narrow region between the 6th/7th muscles22 (Figure 2A), we opted for a longitudinal incision along the muscle. Excess resin and muscles near the target regions were removed23. After fixation with OsO4, the samples exhibited a dark brown coloration. The samples with epoxy resin required a sequential polymerization process at 37 °C (24 h), 42 °C (24 h), and 60 °C (24 h). The samples with Lowicryl K4M resin were polymerized in UV light with 365 nm wavelength for 3 days at − 35 °C, followed by polymerization for 3 days at 25 °C. The Lowicryl K4M resin presented a white and transparent appearance (Figure 2B), while the epoxy resin appeared yellow (Figure 2C). When examining the body muscles, it was found that the use of Lowicryl K4M resin provided sharper and more easily observable results compared to the epoxy resin. However, it was easier to perform the procedures with epoxy resin at room temperature. Epoxy resin also permitted precise positioning. (Figure 2B–K).
Figure 2: The trimming process of NMJ boutons between 6th/7th muscles in Drosophila larva. (A) shows 6th and 7th intermuscular NMJ immunostaining pattern, where type Ib NMJ buttons (large arrows) and type Is NMJ buttons (small arrows) can be observed. Hrp antibody and Dlg antibody labeled the presynaptic and postsynaptic structures of type I NMJ boutons. Drosophila larvae samples were embedded in (B) Lowicryl K4M resin and (C) Epon 812 resin, respectively, and the 6th and 7th muscles were observed under light microscopy. The blue arrows show the connections between body sections. (D) Serial ultrathin sections were performed in the specific area between the 6th and 7th muscles: the red line is the beginning line, and the green line is the end line. (E) The A2, A3 and A4 body segments of Drosophila larva can be clearly observed under the light microscope after the embedding block was roughly trimmed with a glass knife. (F) Here the A3 segment was retained and trimmed. (G-J) Remove excess resin and (K) unnecessary cuticle near the A3 segment. Scale bar, B, C: 80 µm; E-K: 300 µm. This figure has been modified from Guangming, et al.16. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
It is difficult to see the Drosophila larval NMJ samples processed by traditional sample preparation procedures for electron microscopy14,15. However, based on the distribution pattern of Drosophila larval NMJ under confocal (Fig. 3A–A'), it was hypothesized that boutons between the 6th/7th muscles could be observed more easily by the new method. The neuromuscular junctions can be observed in the form of beads under electron microscopy (Figure 3B–B', D', E-E'). In addition, this new method provided us with more information about the synaptic structure under electron microscopy.
Figure 3: Electron microscopic images of Drosophila larva NMJ. (A, A') After removing the unnecessary resin and cuticle near the 6th muscle, the thickness of the remaining sample was about 100 µm. (B, D) Successive sections were performed starting from the 6th muscle, and as successive sections progressed, the resin component became more abundant (B') while synapses began to gradually appear. Two consecutive sections were observed under electron microscopy, and type Ib synapses were observed in the superficial layer of the 6th muscle with synaptic vesicles, postsynaptic membranes (thin white arrows), presynaptic membranes (thick white arrows) with attached T-bars (white wedge) and dense SSRs (D, D'', E, E'''). The thick black arrows show trimmed muscle and cuticle, and the thin black arrows show the trimmed resin margins. Scale bar, A, A', B, C, D, E: 10 µm; B', D', E'': 200 nm; E': 500 nm; D'', E''': 50 nm. This figure has been modified from Guangming, et al.16. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Drosophila larva samples tend to curl up during dehydration, as the samples are thin, making it difficult to accurately locate the neuromuscular junction, thereby increasing the difficulty and workload for the sample preparation. The traditional improvement is to shorten the sample7, but the samples were still curled to different degrees.
In our method, there are two critical steps: first, the samples remain flat throughout the dehydration process due to the restriction of the metal meshes. Besides, during the polymerization process, the sample can be polymerized by sandwiching it between the plastic products in order to prevent the sample from folding due to temperature change, thereby facilitating the observation of the sample and the positioning of the target muscle under light microscopy. However, the shortcoming of this method is that the samples were not easy to retrieve because of the adhesion between the resin and the plastic.
The flat resin sheets obtained by our method are better for trimming and positioning than traditional embedded blocks. Trimming the resin around the sample as much as possible can also significantly reduce the difficulty and effort of the work. In general, a small amount of resin is usually left around the sample in order to allow the sample to be retained fully in the resin.
This method has been practiced in some of our previous ultrastructural studies of the neuromuscular junction in Drosophila larva24. This method has significantly extended the diamond knife’s life and reduced the wastage of related consumables while drastically reducing the workload. In the future, one should try to apply this method to other biological models, such as brain25 and VNC slices26, thereby improving the potential of ultrastructural research.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 32070811, and Southeast University (China) Analysis Test Fund 11240090971. We thank the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy and Center of Morphological Analysis, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
1,2-Epoxypropane | SHANGHAI LING FENG CHEMICAL REAGENT CO., LTD | JYJ 037-2015 | Penetrating Agent |
Drosophila Stocks | Bloomington | none | The wild-type control Drosophila strains used in this research were all W1118, and were reared according to standard culture methods |
Flat-bottomed glass test tubes | Haimen Chenxing Experimental equipment Company | none | Flat-bottomed glass test tubes(bottle)with sponge plug(or bottle stopper) |
K4M cross-linker | Agar Scientific | Cat# 1924B | The embedding resins are based on a highly cross-linked acrylate and methacrylate formula |
K4M resin (monomer B) | Agar Scientific | Lot# 631557 | Resin Monomer |
Polyvinyl film | Haimen Chenxing Experimental equipment Company | none | Transparent polyethylene film is the best , thickness of about 0.2mm |
SPI Chem DDSA | SPI | SpI#02827-AF | Dodecenyl Succinic Anhydride |
SPI-Chem DMP-30 Epoxy | SPI | 02823-DA | Accelerator |
SPI-Chem NMA | SPI | SpI#02828-AF | Hardner for Epoxy |
SPI-PON 812 Epoxy | SPI | SPI#0259-AB | Resin Monomer |
Steel mesh | Yuhuiyuan Gardening Store(online) | none | Copper or stainless steel net |
Transmission electron microscopy | Hitachi H-7650 | 11416692 | All grids (on which samples were gathered) were stained with lead citrate and observed under a transmission electron microscopy. |
Ultrathin microtome | Leica UC7 ultrathin microtome | 595915 | All sectioning operations are carried out on a Leica UC7 ultrathin microtome using a diamond knife |