Presented here is the protocol for an in situ chemotaxis assay, a recently developed microfluidic device that enables studies of microbial behavior directly in the environment.
Microbial behaviors, such as motility and chemotaxis (the ability of a cell to alter its movement in response to a chemical gradient), are widespread across the bacterial and archaeal domains. Chemotaxis can result in substantial resource acquisition advantages in heterogeneous environments. It also plays a crucial role in symbiotic interactions, disease, and global processes, such as biogeochemical cycling. However, current techniques restrict chemotaxis research to the laboratory and are not easily applicable in the field. Presented here is a step-by-step protocol for the deployment of the in situ chemotaxis assay (ISCA), a device that enables robust interrogation of microbial chemotaxis directly in the natural environment. The ISCA is a microfluidic device consisting of a 20 well array, in which chemicals of interest can be loaded. Once deployed in aqueous environments, chemicals diffuse out of the wells, creating concentration gradients that microbes sense and respond to by swimming into the wells via chemotaxis. The well contents can then be sampled and used to (1) quantify strength of the chemotactic responses to specific compounds through flow cytometry, (2) isolate and culture responsive microorganisms, and (3) characterize the identity and genomic potential of the responding populations through molecular techniques. The ISCA is a flexible platform that can be deployed in any system with an aqueous phase, including marine, freshwater, and soil environments.
Diverse microorganisms use motility and chemotaxis to exploit patchy nutrient environments, find hosts, or avoid deleterious conditions1,2,3. These microbial behaviours can in turn influence rates of chemical transformation4 and promote symbiotic partnerships across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems2,5.
Chemotaxis has been extensively studied under laboratory conditions for the past 60 years6. The first quantitative method to study chemotaxis, the capillary assay, involves a capillary tube filled with a putative chemoattractant immersed in a suspension of bacteria6. Diffusion of the chemical out of the tube creates a chemical gradient, and chemotactic bacteria respond to this gradient by migrating into the tube7. Since the development of the capillary assay, still widely used today, many other techniques have been developed to study chemotaxis under increasingly controlled physical/chemical conditions, with the most recent involving the use of microfluidics8,9,10.
Microfluidics, together with high-speed video microscopy, enables tracking of the behavior of single cells in response to carefully controlled gradients. Although these techniques have vastly improved our understanding of chemotaxis, they have been restricted to laboratory use and do not translate easily to field deployment in environmental systems. As a consequence, the capacity of natural communities of bacteria to use chemotaxis within natural ecosystems has not been examined; thus, current understanding of the potential ecological importance of chemotaxis is biased toward artificial laboratory conditions and a limited number of laboratory-cultured bacterial isolates. The recently developed ISCA overcomes these limitations11.
The ISCA builds on the general principle of the capillary assay; however, it makes use of modern microfabrication techniques to deliver a highly replicated, easily deployable experimental platform for the quantification of chemotaxis toward compounds of interest in the natural environment. It also allows identification and characterization of chemotactic microorganisms by direct isolation or molecular techniques. While the first working device was self-fabricated and constructed of glass and PDMS11, the latest injection-molded version is composed of polycarbonate, using a highly standardized fabrication procedure (for interest in the latest version of the device, the corresponding authors can be contacted).
The ISCA is credit card-sized and consists of 20 wells distributed in a 5 x 4 well array, each linked to the external aquatic environment by a small port (800 µm in diameter; Figure 1). Putative chemoattractants loaded into the wells diffuse into the environment via the port, and chemotactic microbes respond by swimming through the port into the well. As many factors can influence the outcome of an ISCA experiment in the natural environment, this step-by-step protocol will help new users overcome potential hurdles and facilitate effective deployments.
We recommend executing section 1 prior to field experiments to optimize results.
1. Laboratory optimization
NOTE: The volumes described in the optimization procedure are sufficient for a single ISCA (composed of 20 wells).
2. Preparation for field deployment
NOTE: Preparation of material and construction of the flow-damping enclosure (section 2) must be conducted prior to deployment.
3. Procedure in the field
4. Downstream applications
NOTE: Volumes are given based on a 550 µL sample (one row of an ISCA).
This section presents laboratory results using the ISCA to test the chemotactic response of marine microbes to a concentration range of glutamine, an amino acid known to attract soil bacteria14. The concentration of glutamine that elicited the strongest chemotactic response in the laboratory tests was used to perform a chemotaxis assay in the marine environment.
To perform the laboratory tests, seawater communities sampled from coastal water in Sydney, Australia, were enriched for motile cells through a simple nutrient amendment4, as described in step 1.4. Glutamine was serially diluted in ultrafiltered seawater to obtain final concentrations ranging from 10 mM to 100 µM. Five ISCA replicates were deployed simultaneously for this experiment, and each contained three different glutamine concentrations (one concentration per row) as well as a filtered seawater control row. After a 1 h deployment, the contents of each ISCA row (containing the same glutamine concentration) were pooled to provide working samples of approximately 550 µL. This volume was fixed in glutaraldehyde (2% final concentration), and the number of responding bacteria quantified via flow cytometry.
Briefly, bacterial abundance was quantified by 1) staining the cells with a green fluorescent DNA dye and 2) analysis using a flow cytometer with ultrafiltered deionised water as the sheath fluid. For each sample, forward scatter (FSC), side scatter (SSC), and green fluorescence were recorded. The samples were analysed at a flow rate of 25 μL/min, with bacterial cells discriminated according to SSC and green fluorescence. The chemotactic index (Ic) was determined by dividing the bacterial counts present in each sample by the averaged bacterial counts in the filtered seawater control wells (FSW).
Results showed that 1 mM was the optimal glutamine deployment concentration, as it induced a significant chemotactic response that was 18-fold higher than the filtered seawater control (t-test, p < 0.001) (Figure 5A). Higher or lower concentrations of glutamine induced significant but weaker chemotactic responses (Ic = 5.43 for 100 µM, p < 0.001; Ic = 7.34 for 10 µM, p < 0.001). If the chemoattractant concentration added to an ISCA well is too high, chemotaxis into the well can be reduced, because (1) bacteria will not be able to detect a gradient in the port section and may aggregate above the well, or (2) the pH or osmolarity of the well may be affected.
The optimal glutamine concentration was subsequently used for field deployment. Five ISCA replicates filled with 1 mM glutamine were deployed for 1 h at a coastal site near Sydney, Australia (33.91 °S, 151.26 °E). Glutamine attracted 2.98 times more bacteria than the control wells filled with filtered seawater from the deployment site (Figure 5B). The chemotactic response in this field experiment was significantly different from the controls (t-test, p < 0.001) and constituted a strong response for coastal seawater11.
Figure 1: Detailed views of the in situ chemotaxis assay (ISCA). (A) The latest injection-molded ISCA. (B) Schematic of an ISCA well. Scale bar = 7.463 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Assembly of the flow-damping enclosure. (A) The pieces required for assembly of the deployment enclosure. During fabrication, edges should be smooth. (B) Place pieces 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b around piece 1 (lower surface). (C) Assemble the lower part of the enclosure by putting a thin layer of acrylic glue around the first edge of the lower surface (1). (D) Place the first longer sidewall piece (2a) vertically onto the glue and hold it in place. The glue requires ~1 min to solidify and allows piece 2a to support itself while placing the next element. (E) Apply a thin layer of acrylic glue to the lower surface on a shorter side of piece 1. Place the short sidewall piece (3a) onto the acrylic glue and lock it into the previously placed sidewall. Hold the two pieces for approximately 1 min. (F) Place the other short sidewall piece (3b) onto the opposite side of the lower surface (1). Again, lock it into the connecting piece (2a) and hold it for approximately 1 min. (G) If needed, reapply acrylic glue to the remaining long side of the lower surface (1). Place the last long sidewall piece (2b) and connect it into the two adjacent pieces (3a and 3b). Make sure that all the pieces are properly aligned with the lower piece (1) and that no signs of misalignment or gaps between sidewalls or the lower surface are present. Repeat these steps to assemble the complementary upper portion of the enclosure (4, 5a, 5b, 6a, and 6b). (H) Make sure that the hole in the corner of piece 4 is not obstructed during assembly, otherwise punch the opening with a sharp object such as a needle. The holes of the enclosure play a critical role in the deployment process and allow water to drain in a slow and controlled manner. Their diameter has been optimized to reduce turbulent flow inside the enclosure, which prevents disturbance of the fluid surrounding ISCA ports upon retrieval. (Ia,b) Glue together two large rectangles (7) and separately glue two smaller ones (8). Repeat once for each. (J) Glue the four assembled rectangles in the center of the enclosure’s lower surface (1). (K) Glue the upper deck (9) on top of the rectangles (7 and 8). Make sure that the side holes of the piece are on the external side of the rectangles. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Placement of ISCAs in the enclosure and sealing by taping. (A) Place the mounting screws in the ISCA. (B) ISCA placement in the deployment enclosure. Place the ISCA in the middle of the deployment enclosure and attach it with the specified screws. The lower drain hole of the enclosure must be sealed with a modified 20 µL tip (Figure 4) once the enclosure is filled with water. This helps to avoid generation of turbulent flows that can affect the stability of the chemical field and effectiveness of chemotaxis. (C) The upper and lower parts are assembled together. (D) Sealing of the enclosure using adhesive tape. Wrinkles must be avoided to prevent leaks. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Plug for sealing the flow-damping enclosure. The plug can be made by sealing a 20 µL pipette tip with heat. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Chemotaxis assays using the ISCA toward glutamine of an enriched motile community in the laboratory and natural microbial population in the field. Chemotaxis index Ic (representing the concentration of cells within ISCA wells) normalized by the mean concentration of cells within the wells containing the filtered seawater (FSW) after 60 min of deployment. Each concentration was tested in five ISCA replicates. Bacterial cells were quantified by flow cytometry (A): FSW = 4.46 ± 0.25 x 103; 100 µM = 2.43 ± 0.16 x 104; 1 mM = 8.07 ± 0.45 x 104; 10 mM = 3.28 ± 0.20 x 104; (B): FSW = 1.26 ± 0.11 x 104; 1 mM = 3.76 ± 0.28 x 104 cells/mL). All concentrations of glutamine tested in the (A) laboratory and (B) field induced a chemotactic response significantly higher than the filtered seawater (FSW) controls. In all pairwise comparisons: (A) Tukey HSD, n = 5, p < 0.005; (B) Tukey HSD, n = 5, p < 0.005. Error bars represent SEM. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Field material | Quantity |
Water filtration | |
Tube rack – 50 mL | 1 |
Hydrophilic GP filter cartridge – 0.2 µm | 1 |
Syringe filter – 0.2 µm | 1 |
Syringe filter – 0.02 µm | 1 |
Syringes – 50 mL | 4 |
Conical centrifuge tube – 50 mL | 5 |
Chemical resuspension | |
Conical centrifuge tube – 15 mL | 4 |
Chemoattractants | |
Syringes – 10 mL | 4 |
Syringe filter – 0.2 µm | 4 |
Tube rack – 15 mL | 1 |
ISCA filling | |
Syringe needle 27G | 4 |
Syringe – 1 mL | 4 |
ISCA | 1 |
Deployment | |
Deployment enclosure | 1 |
Nylon slotted flat head screws | 2 |
Deployment arm | 1 |
Bungee cord | 2 |
Adhesive tape | 1 |
Deployment enclosure plug | 1 |
Samples retrieval | |
Syringe needle 27G | 4 |
Syringes – 1 mL | 4 |
Centrifuge tube – 2 mL | 12 |
Disposable wipers | 1 box |
Glutaraldehyde 25% | 10 mL |
Other material | |
Pipettes set | 1 |
Pipette tips 200 µL | 1 box |
Pipette tips 20 µL | 1 box |
Pipette tips 1 mL | 1 box |
Table 1: Materials necessary for field deployment.
At the scale of aquatic microorganisms, the environment is far from homogenous and is often characterized by physical/chemical gradients that structure microbial communities1,15. The capacity of motile microorganisms to use behavior (i.e., chemotaxis) facilitates foraging within these heterogeneous microenvironments1. Studying chemotaxis directly in the environment has the potential to identify important interspecific interactions and chemical preferences, and this can help untangle the contributions of specific microbes to biogeochemical processes. The presented protocol deploys the ISCA in the environment11 to facilitate the acquisition of reproducible research on chemotaxis in situ.
Using the ISCA, it is shown that glutamine elicits a positive chemotactic response both in laboratory conditions and in the field. The ISCA deployment of glutamine in the field yields a lower chemotactic response than in the laboratory (Figure 5). Similar patters between laboratory and field experiments have been observed previously11. These can be explained by the lower proportion of motile cells in the environment compared to the enriched communities or single motile isolate used in laboratory assays.
The importance of preliminary laboratory-based experiments should not be underestimated, as they permit determination of optimal chemoattractant concentrations to use in field deployments. The optimal concentration is specific to each chemoattractant and influenced by its molecular weight, solubility, and diffusivity from the wells. In the case of deployment of multiple distinct substances, each should be tested individually across a concentration range. If no chemotaxis is detected in the field after 1 h, longer deployments can be carried out. However, the length of the deployment is strongly constrained by bacterial growth and should always be shorter than the division rate of bacteria in the targeted environment. This helps to avoid population growth within the ISCA.
The ISCA is sensitive to water turbulence and care should be taken when filling and emptying the flow-damping enclosure. These steps must be performed slowly, because flows resulting from rapid filling can flush or dilute the contents of the wells. As a result, this removes or prevents chemoattractants from diffusing properly or introducing bacteria from the surrounding environment, ultimately biasing cell counts. Fully filling the enclosure with water while venting all air, then closing it completely, ensures that turbulence will not interfere with the deployment. Collecting metadata at the deployment site (i.e., temperature, salinity, chlorophyll/nutrient concentration) is also a critical step to interpret results, as these factors can influence chemotaxis.
The ISCA is an accessible, user-friendly device that provides new insights into the role and prevalence of chemotaxis in the environment. It enables interrogation of chemotaxis in any system containing a liquid phase (e.g., marine, freshwater, soil, wastewater systems). Finally, it can be used for targeted studies on pathogens and antibiotic resistance in the environment, isolation of key microbes for bioprospecting, and bioremediation of specific pollutants and microplastics.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research was funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Marine Microbiology Initiative, through grant GBMF3801 to J.R.S. and R.S., and an Investigator Award (GBMF3783) to R.S., as well as an Australian Research Council Fellowship (DE160100636) to J.B.R., an award from the Simons Foundation to B.S.L. (594111), and a grant from the Simons Foundation (542395) to R.S. as part of the Principles of Microbial Ecosystems (PriME) Collaborative.
Acrylic glue | Evonik | 1133 | Acrifix 1S 0116 |
Acrylic sheet | McMaster-Carr | 8505K725 | Or different company |
Adhesive tape | Scotch | 3M 810 | Scotch Magic tape |
Autoclave | Systec | D-200 | Or different company |
Benchtop centrifuge | Fisher Scientific | 75002451 | Or different company |
Bungee cord | Paracord Planet | 667569184000 | Or different company |
Centrifuge tube – 2 mL | Sigma Aldrich | BR780546-500EA | Eppendorf tube |
Conical centrifuge tube – 15 mL | Fisher Scientific | 11507411 | Falcon tube |
Conical centrifuge tube – 50 mL | Fisher Scientific | 10788561 | Falcon tube |
Deployment arm | Irwin | 1964719 | Or different company |
Deployment enclosure plug | Fisher Scientific | 21-236-4 | See alternatives in manuscript |
Disposable wipers | Kimtech – Fisher Scientific | 06-666 | Kimwipes |
Flow cytometer | Beckman | C09756 | CYTOFlex |
Glutaraldehyde 25% | Sigma Aldrich | G5882 | Or different company |
Green fluorescent dye | Sigma Aldrich | S9430 | SYBR Green I – 1:10,000 final dilution |
Hydrophilic GP filter cartridge – 0.2 µm | Merck | C3235 | Sterivex filter |
In Situ Chemotaxis Assay (ISCA) | – | – | Contact corresponding authors |
Laser cutter | Epilog Laser | Fusion pro 32 | Or different company |
Luria Bertani Broth | Sigma Aldrich | L3022 | Or different company |
Marine Broth 2216 | VWR | 90004-006 | Difco |
Nylon slotted flat head screws | McMaster-Carr | 92929A243 | M 2 × 4 × 8 mm |
Pipette set | Fisher Scientific | 05-403-151 | Or different company |
Pipette tips – 1 mL | Fisher Scientific | 21-236-2A | Or different company |
Pipette tips – 20 µL | Fisher Scientific | 21-236-4 | Or different company |
Pipette tips – 200 µL | Fisher Scientific | 21-236-1 | Or different company |
Sea salt | Sigma Aldrich | S9883 | For artificial seawater |
Serological pipette – 50 mL | Sigma Aldrich | SIAL1490-100EA | Or different company |
Syringe filter – 0.02 µm | Whatman | WHA68091002 | Anatop filter |
Syringe filter – 0.2 µm | Fisher Scientific | 10695211 | Or different company |
Syringe needle 27G | Henke Sass Wolf | 4710004020 | 0.4 × 12 mm |
Syringes – 1 mL | Codau | 329650 | Insulin Luer U-100 |
Syringes – 10 mL | BD | 303134 | Or different company |
Syringes – 50 mL | BD | 15899152 | Or different company |
Tube rack – 15 mL | Thomas Scientific | 1159V80 | Or different company |
Tube rack – 50 mL | Thomas Scientific | 1159V80 | Or different company |
Uncoated High-Speed Steel General Purpose Tap | McMaster-Carr | 8305A77 | Or different company |
Vacuum filter – 0.2 µm | Merck | SCGPS05RE | Steritop filter |