The objective of this protocol is to detect different Clostridium perfringens toxinotypes in locally purchased foods, particularly epsilon toxin producing strain types B and D, without the use of anaerobic chambers.
Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) is a prolific toxin producer and causes a wide range of diseases in various hosts. C. perfringens is categorized into five different toxinotypes, A through E, based on the carriage of four major toxin genes. The prevalence and distribution of these various toxinotypes is understudied, especially their pervasiveness in American retail food. Of particular interest to us are the type B and D strains, which produce epsilon toxin, an extremely lethal toxin suggested to be the environmental trigger of multiple sclerosis in humans. To evaluate the presence of different C. perfringens toxinotypes in various food samples, we developed an easy method to selectively culture these bacteria without the use of an anaerobic container system only involving three culturing steps. Food is purchased from local grocery stores and transported to the laboratory under ambient conditions. Samples are minced and inoculated into modified rapid perfringens media (RPM) and incubated overnight at 37 °C in a sealed, airtight conical tube. Overnight cultures are inoculated onto a bottom layer of solid Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine (TSC) agar, and then overlaid with a top layer of molten TSC agar, creating a "sandwiched", anaerobic environment. Agar plates are incubated overnight at 37 °C and then evaluated for appearance of black, sulfite-reducing colonies. C. perfringens-suspected colonies are removed from the TSC agar using sterile eye droppers, and inoculated into RPM and sub-cultured overnight at 37 °C in an airtight conical tube. DNA is extracted from the RPM subculture, and then analyzed for the presence of C. perfringens toxin genes via polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Depending on the type of food sampled, typically 15–20% of samples test positive for C. perfringens.
Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) is a Gram positive, anaerobic, spore-forming, rod shaped bacterium that is found ubiquitously in the environment. This species of bacteria carries genes that encode for over 17 toxins and, historically, has been characterized into five toxinotypes (A-E) based on the presence of four different toxin genes: alpha, beta, epsilon, and iota toxin (Table 1)1. Recently, it has been suggested that this typing-scheme needs to be expanded to include types F and G, which harbor the C. perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) and NetB toxin, respectively2. However, more research is needed before this scheming system is formally accepted. While the alpha toxin gene is strictly chromosomally located, the CPE gene can be found both on the chromosome and plasmids. In comparison, the remaining toxins' genes are found on various differently-sized plasmids. We are particularly interested in the prevalence of C. perfringens types B and D as these strains produce epsilon toxin, an extremely potent, pore-forming toxin, which has been suggested to play a role in triggering multiple sclerosis (MS) in humans3,4,5,6,7. How people become infected or colonized by these strains is unknown. One possible explanation is through consumption of contaminated food products. To help answer this question, we sought to determine the prevalence of different C. perfringens toxinotypes in American food samples.
The presence of C. perfringens toxinotypes in American food samples is understudied and often requires use of anaerobic container systems and numerous sub-culturing steps8,9,10,11. Although numerous sub-culturing steps are needed to obtain purified isolates, this method can lead to loss of plasmids over time12,13,14, possibly affecting the detection of plasmid-borne toxin genes including the epsilon toxin gene. We sought to develop an easy method, with fewer sub-culturing steps, to selectively culture C. perfringens without the use of anaerobic chambers, jars, or bags. Briefly, food samples are inoculated into Rapid Perfringens Media (RPM) overnight (ON), then "sandwiched" into TSC agar and incubated ON. Colonies suspected to be C. perfringens are then sub-cultured into RPM and incubated again ON. DNA is extracted and PCR performed to determine genotype (Figure 1). We chose to use RPM as it has been demonstrated to increase the recovery of C. perfringens strains from food samples compared to other more standard media15. In addition, RPM was successfully used to isolate an epsilon toxin producing type B strain from an MS patient4. We use a modified version of RPM instead of the original version to allow easy DNA extraction. While this method allows easy identification of toxin genes within samples, it is possible that an individual sample will contain more than one C. perfringens toxinotype. Because our method does not isolate purified strains using multiple rounds of purification, identification of multiple toxinotypes from one sample is not possible. However, standard purification techniques (typically streaking onto TSC plates or blood agar plates) can be applied at the end of our protocol to achieve purified cultures.
NOTE: C. perfringens is considered a biosafety hazard level 2 (BSL2) organism. Although not all food samples will contain C. perfringens, all cultured samples should be treated as such. All proper precautions and personnel protective equipment (PPE) should be worn at all times. Decontaminate all material prior to disposal.
1. Prepare modified RPM4,15
2. Sample collection and RPM incubation
3. TSC "sandwich" plating
4. Sub-culturing of sulfite-reducing colonies
5. DNA Extraction
6. Detection of C. perfringens via PCR genotyping
Using this method, 15–20% of our sampled foods test positive for C. perfringens. While most strains are positive for toxinotype A, we have successfully detected both Type B and D in food samples. In a previously published paper we tested a total of 216 food samples purchased from New York retail stores16 (Table 3). These samples included various meat samples (beef, lamb, pork and lamb), poultry samples (chicken and turkey), and seafood samples (cod, salmon, shellfish, snapper, flounder, squid, tilapia, tuna, and various other fishes). Produce and dairy samples were also tested. Of 216 samples, 34 (16%) were positive for C. perfringens. Of the 34 C. perfringens positive samples, 31 samples (91.2%) contained the alpha toxin, one sample (2.9%) contained the alpha, beta and epsilon toxin, and two samples (5.9%) contained the alpha and epsilon toxin.
Interestingly, we also discovered that C. perfringens was more prevalent as vegetative cells compared to spores. Twenty-five samples were compared for the presence of vegetative C. perfringens cells or spores. Spores were selected for by heat shocking samples at 85 °C for 15 min. Of the 25 samples tested, 16% were positive for vegetative C. perfringens strains versus 4% for spores. This indicates that it may be more cost effective to test for only vegetative cells instead of both.
Figure 1: Overview of procedure.
Food samples are minced and diluted into sterile PBS. Half of the PBS-food sample is inoculated into RPM to select for vegetative cells. The remaining PBS-food sample is heat shocked at 85 °C for 15 min to select for spores prior to inoculation in RPM. Cultures are incubated ON at 37 °C then plated into TSC agar. TSC agar is incubated ON at 37 °C and black, sulfite-reducing cultures are sub-cultured into fresh RPM. Sub-cultured RPM cultures are incubated ON at 37 °C and DNA is extracted to perform genotyping via PCR. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Schematic of TSC agar sandwich technique.
RPM media containing the C. perfringens bacteria are plated between two layers of TSC agar in order to promote an anaerobic environment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Selected PCR results.
Example images of the genotyping results of C. perfringens from seven different types of food, and a positive control of C. perfringens type B. A molecular weight ladder (first lane of each gel) was used to approximate the size of PCR results in base pairs (bp). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Toxinotype | Alpha | Beta | Epsilon | Iota | CPE | NetB | |
Established | A | + | – | – | – | – | – |
B | + | + | + | – | – | – | |
C | + | + | – | – | + | – | |
D | + | – | + | – | + | – | |
E | + | – | – | + | + | – | |
Proposed | F | + | – | – | – | + | – |
G | + | – | – | – | – | + | |
+ present – not present +/- may or may not be present |
Table 1: Overview of C. perfringens genotypes. A chart of the combinations of toxins produced by each C. perfringens toxinotype.
Target | Primer Pairs | Expected PCR Product (bp) |
alpha | F: GCT AAT GTT ACT GCC GTT GA R: CCT CTG ATA CAT CGT GTA AG |
325 |
beta | F: GCG AAT ATG CTG AAT CAT CTA R: GCA GGA ACA TTA GTA TAT CTT C |
196 |
epsilon | F: GCG GTG ATA TCC ATC TAT TC R: CCA CTT ACT TGT CCT ACT AAC |
655 |
16s RNA | F: AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC A R: GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T |
~1300 |
Table 2: Primers and expected PCR products for selected toxin genes. Primers used in the PCR genotyping step.
Food Type | Type A | Type B | Type C | Type D | C. perf + | |||||||
alpha toxin positive | alpha, beta, and epsilon toxin positive | alpha and beta toxin positive | alpha and epsilon toxin positive | |||||||||
n | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
Meat | beef | 38 | 8 | 21% | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 9 | 24% |
lamb | 10 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
pork | 15 | 2 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 13% | |
mixed | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | |
subtotal | 64 | 11 | 17% | 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 12 | 19% | |
Poultry | chicken | 19 | 5 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 26% |
turkey | 7 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
subtotal | 26 | 5 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% | |
Seafood | cod | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
mixed | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
salmon | 11 | 2 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 18% | |
shelfish | 32 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% | |
snapper | 4 | 3 | 75% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 75% | |
flounder | 12 | 4 | 33% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 33% | |
squid | 4 | 1 | 25% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 25% | |
tilapia | 21 | 2 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% | 4 | 19% | |
tuna | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
other | 8 | 1 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 13% | |
subtotal | 100 | 14 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 2% | 16 | 16% | |
Dairy | cow | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
goat | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
milk | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
subtotal | 10 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
Produce | vegetable | 12 | 1 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 8% |
fruit | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
herb | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
subtotal | 16 | 1 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% | |
Total | 216 | 31 | 14% | 1 | 0.50% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0.90% | 34 | 16% |
Table 3: Prevalence of different C. perfringens toxinotypes in 216 food samples. An example of the results obtained when using this method to test retail food for C. perfringens. This table has been modified from the previously published manuscript Regan et al.16.
Here we describe a method to identify C. perfringens prevalence in retail food samples with limited subculturing and without use of an anaerobic chamber system. This method uses a combination of techniques to increase identification of C. perfringens from food samples. By using a modified version of RPM media, we allow for the selective growth of C. perfringens. By sandwiching the inoculated RPM in between layers of TSC agar, we are able to identify and isolate anaerobic, sulfite-reducing bacteria characteristic of C. perfringens. To confirm the presence of C. perfringens, sulfite-reducing colonies are sub-cultured into fresh RPM. The modified version or RPM allows us to easily extract DNA from cultures, enabling PCR confirmation of specific toxin genes. Confirmation of C. perfringens contaminated food samples can be achieved within three days.
In early experiments, food samples were simply inoculated into RPM and DNA extracted from ON cultures. This method resulted in detection of C. perfringens in a limited number of samples (data not shown). Although RPM is selective for C. perfringens growth, it is not exclusive for C. perfringens growth. Other, gram-positive, D-cycolserine resistant bacteria can still grow in RPM. We hypothesized that contamination by other bacterial species may have decreased our detection of C. perfringens strains by decreasing the sensitivity of our PCR analysis in our first ON RPM culture. A critical step in increasing the detection of C. perfringens was the inclusion of the TSC agar “sandwich” technique. This allowed us to differentiate and select for anaerobic, sulfite-reducing colonies, characteristic of C. perfringens. A key step in this process is ensuring that the top layer of molten TSC agar is at 40 °C. Although some C. perfringens strains can grow at increased temperatures (46–48 °C)15,16, addition of molten agar at increased temperatures greatly reduces the amount of cultures recovered, mostly likely due to cell death.
There are several potential limitations to this method. As mentioned previously, neither the RPM nor TSC agar selects or differentiates for C. perfringens exclusively, allowing for growth of other bacterial species present in food samples. This may reduce the sensitivity of the assay to select for C. perfringens only. However, this is a common limitation in almost all culturing techniques. Genotyping confirmation of purified isolates is the best method for definitively identifying C. perfringens and other bacterial species. Another limitation of this study is that we do not test the purified isolates. We purposely did this to limit the amount of subculturing, as repeated subculturing is feared to result in plasmid loss. Because we do not isolate to purity, it is possible that multiple C. perfringens toxinotypes may be present in the same sample or subculture. If researchers wish to obtain purified isolates, standard purification methods can be used on the last RPM culture described in this method; this typically requires the use of anaerobic chambers. Although originally used to isolate C. perfringens from food, this method can be used to identify and isolate C. perfringens from a multitude of sources. Specifically, one such application of this method is to test fecal samples from humans (or animals) that are suspected to be infected with C. perfringens and toxinotype the bacteria to better understand the source of infection.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research did not receive any specific funding from the public, commercial, or not-for profit sectors.
D-Cycloserine | Sigma-Aldrich | C6880 | |
Dextrose | Sigma Life Science | D9434-250G | |
Disposable Transfer Pipets | any brand | Select one with slim tip like Thermo Scientific Disposable Transfer Pipets 137116M/EMD | |
DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kits | Qiagen | 69504 | Note: numerous DNA and plasmid extractions kits were evaluated, this kit gave the most desirable results. |
Dry Incubator | any brand | ||
Fluid thioglycolate medium | Remel | R453452 | |
Gelatin from porcine skin | Sigma Life Science | G1890-500G | |
Individual Primers | Invitrogen | ||
Iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate | Sigma Life Science | F8633-250 G | |
Lysozyme from chicken egg white | Sigma-Aldrich | L6876 | Needed for DNA extraction, not provided in kit |
microcentrifuge tube | any brand | ||
parafilm or plastic wrap | any brand | ||
Peptone from casein and other animal proteins | Sigma-Aldrich | 70173-100G | |
Perfringens Agar Base (TSC + SFP) | Oxoid | CM0587 | Make TSC agar according to instructions |
Potassium phosphate dibasic | Sigma-Aldrich | P2222-100G | |
Sodium chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | S-7653 | |
Sterile Cell Scraper | any brand | ||
Sterile cell Spreader | any brand | ||
Sterile petri dishes | any brand | ||
Supplies and equipment for gel electrophoresis | any brand | ||
table top centrifuge | any brand | ||
Taq PCR Master Mix Kit | Qiagen | 201443 | |
Thermocycler for PCR reaction | any brand | ||
water bath | any brand | ||
Yeast extract | Sigma-Aldrich | 70161-100G |