We established a novel surgical protocol for two-photon imaging of live mice liver with minimal invasion. With this technique, we identified the detailed structure of the liver during lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxemia. We anticipate that this method may be utilized to determine the effectiveness of various reagents treatment to hepatic leukocyte migration.
Sepsis is a type of severe infection that can cause organ failure and tissue damage. Although the mortality and morbidity rates associated with sepsis are extremely high, no direct treatment or organ-related mechanism has been examined in detail in real time. The liver is the key organ that manages toxins and infections in the human body. Herein, we aimed to perform intravital imaging of mouse liver after induction of endotoxemia in order to track the motility of immune cells, such as neutrophils and liver capsular macrophages (LCMs). Accordingly, we designed a novel surgical method for exposure of the liver with minimally invasive surgery. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a common endotoxin. Using our novel surgical approach for exposure and intravital imaging of the mouse liver, we found that neutrophil recruitment in LPS-treated LysM-green fluorescent protein (GFP) mouse liver was increased compared with that in phosphate-buffered saline-treated liver. After LPS treatment, the number of neutrophils increased significantly with time. Additionally, using CX3Cr1-GFP mice, we successfully visualized liver resident macrophages called LCMs. Therefore, to investigate the efficacy of new reagents to control immune mobility in vivo, determining the motility and morphology of neutrophils and LCMs in the liver may allow us to identify therapeutic effect in organ failure and tissue damage caused by leukocytes activation in sepsis.
The liver is the major metabolic organ in mammals; it acts as a control tower for energy, hormones, and detoxification1. Due to its importance, researchers have conducted many in vitro and in vivo experiments to elucidate the changes in the liver during inflammation. Intravital microscopy has been used to capture live images from the liver2 . Indeed, various liver imaging methods have been introduced2,3,4,5,6. However, in order to develop a more simplified surgical approach and achieve stabilization of the target organ and the immune cells, we designed a simple protocol that can guide researchers to minimize their effort for intravital imaging.
In this study, we introduced a stable and novel imaging chamber and surgical technique that could be used to minimize bleeding and possible infections. We confirmed that the liver remained intact for more than 2 h. With this method, we successfully identified morphologies of LCMs7 and neutrophils under septic condition. Since this method minimizes physical and biological confounding factors such as trembling and unexpected inflammation during surgical procedure, we anticipate that this method could be used to observe acute reactions of immune cells in the liver in response to reagents like LPS.
All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea. LysM-green fluorescent protein (GFP; gfp/+) mice8 and CX3Cr1-GFP (gfp/+)9 mice at 8-12 weeks of age were used for intravital imaging. All surgical tools were autoclaved and disinfected with 70 % alcohol.
1. Custom-designed mouse liver imaging chamber with supporting tools
2. Preparation of LPS
3. Preparation of Texas-Red Dextran to stain blood vessels
4. Surgical process
5. Intravital imaging of the liver with two-photon microscopy
6. Data analysis
A simple and very stable imaging chamber was devised. The bottom of chamber was covered with silicone, which prevented slipping of the mouse body and organs. Additionally, because silicon has the proper amount of elasticity, it could prevent expected damage induced by the pressure of the cover slide (Figure 1A, C). Second, tissue-safe glue (Vet bond) was applied in order to fix the extracted liver on the circle-shaped silicone bed. This method enabled us to avoid trembling caused by heartbeat or respirational movement. Finally, a metal cover slide was placed and fixed by bolts and nuts based on the body size of the mice and the position of the protruding liver (Figure 1B–D). When anesthesia was performed properly, these imaging settings could last longer than 6 h.
Before starting surgery, the body temperature of the mice was controlled by placing the animal on a heating chamber that was pre-set to 37 °C (Figure 2A). Next, to prevent secondary infection, all necessary tools for mouse surgery and imaging were sterilized with 70% alcohol and/or autoclaved to prevent secondary infection (Figure 2B). Then, mouse body hair was removed, particularly from the abdominal area, with a hair removal cream (Figure 2C). Before making the incision, the skin was sterilized with povidone iodine. The blood flow was labelled with Texas-Red Dextran via vein injection (Figure 2D). A line that began at the xiphoid process and ended at the right ribs was drawn. This right subcostal incision line helped minimize bleeding. With a scalpel or micro-scissors, the dissection was started; the abdomen was not opened too much to avoid expulsion of the intestines from the abdominal cavity (Figure 2E, F). Fat and tissue layers were removed with forceps and micro-dissection scissors, and the incision area was cleaned with sterilized PBS and cotton swabs (Figure 2G). The left lateral lobe, the largest of the four liver lobes, was taken out with cotton swabs and then attached to the silicon bed using a tissue bond (Vet bond). As the liver tissue was extremely friable, the liver was moved out using cotton swabs (Figure 2H, I). After applying metal cover glass, the liver was subjected to imaging. To prevent dryness, sterilized PBS was applied to the space between the liver and cover glass (Figure 2J). The height of the cover glass was adjusted with nuts when needed.
Two-photon microscopy was equipped with X, Y, and Z axes micrometer controller and shielded with black curtain (Figure 3A). The laser was stably mode-locked on the Zen software. To acquire stable imaging, drifting of target organ should be prevented. Therefore, in addition to imaging chamber and surgical method, the wires of the electronic heating pad were secured away from the imaging stage and well-organized by sticky tapes (Figure 3B). Lastly, a sufficient amount of distilled water was added to the top of the cover glass for the water immersion lens (Figure 3C).
The blood flow was clearly indicated on the screen after intravenous injection of Texas-Red Dextran. In order to capture both red and green simultaneously, we performed imaging with a wavelength of 880 nm. According to intravital imaging analysis, an appropriate number of neutrophils was always circulating the blood in PBS condition. Whereas, the number of neutrophils in LPS treated mice was significantly increased. Note that a lot of neutrophils were circulating inside the bloodstream but they did not migrate outside the vessel in inflammatory condition. (Figure 4A, Supplementary Movie 1). Neutrophils in the LPS-treated mice were more firmly adhered to the luminal surface of the vessel, which made more frequent detection of neutrophils in the vessel (Figure 4A, Supplementary Movie 1). Apart from the motility of neutrophils, LCMs in CX3Cr1-GFP mice were observed on the surface of liver tissue rather than deep within the tissue (Figure 4B). LCMs showed little movement or activation in the liver even in LPS-treated mice.
Figure 1. Design of liver chamber and subsidiary tools. (A) Pouring the silicone mixture into the custom-designed mouse chamber. (B) Dimensions of the metal cover slide (1 inch = 25.4 mm, Ф = diameter). (C) The image shows the plastic custom-designed liver chamber filled with silicone elastomer. (D) Other parts were used to assemble the liver chamber. Fixing bolts and nuts were made of iron. Arrows indicated bolts and nuts, respectively, in (C) and (D). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Surgical steps for liver surgery. (A) Metal and rubber heating plates at 37°C and DC temperature controller before surgery. (B) Overall surgery and supportive tools for liver surgery (a. Cotton swab and container, b. 70% alcohol, c. paper tissue, d. razor, e. hair removal cream, f. custom-designed chamber, g. surgical tape, h. home-made liver pedestal, i. wing nuts and nuts, j. metal cover slide, k. micro-dissection scissors, l. forceps, m. scissors, n. 3-mL syringe, o. marker, p. 0.3-mL insulin syringe, q. 1-mL syringe). Procedure for liver surgery (C-J). (C) Applying hair removal cream at the abdominal site. (D) Retro-orbital injection of mice with Texas-Red Dextran. (E) Marking the incision site with a marker. (F) Cutting the epidermis with forceps and scissors. (G) Making an incision into the abdominal cavity. (H) Pulling out the left lateral lobe gently. (I) Attaching the lobe to the liver pedestal using vet bond. (J) Image of the final set up. Nuts were fixed to the metal cover slide, and then the cover slide was fixed with butterfly nuts. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Settings for two-photon microscopy and imaging stage. (A) View of two-photon microscopy (LSM 7 MP) and the imaging stage, which can move in the x and y directions. (B) A liver imaging chamber with a rubber heating pad was attached using tape to cover the mouse. (C) Dropping distilled water with a pipette between the objective lens and cover glass. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Visualization of neutrophils and liver capsular macrophages in the liver of live mice. (A) Extended focus snapshot of neutrophils in the liver of LysM-GFP mice. The control image was from PBS-treated mice. The LPS image was from LPS-treated mice. Images were acquired using a 20X/1.0 NA water-immersion lens (field of view [FOV] = 424.3 µm × 424.3 µm, depth = 40 µm, slice Interval = 1 µm, time interval = 60 s, cycle = 31). Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) Inner and surface area snapshot of LCMs in the liver of CX3Cr1-GFP mice. Images were acquired using a 20×/1.0 NA water-immersion lens (FOV = 424.3 µm × 424.3 µm, depth = 40 µm (inner) / 10 µm (surface), slice interval = 1 µm, time interval = 60 s (inner) / 20 s (surface), cycle = 31). Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Movie 1. Comparison of PBS treated liver versus LPS treated liver. Clear difference in two different conditions is well observed. In LPS treated liver, the number of neutrophils is significantly increased and the motility is decreased. The stability of the movie in both conditions are observed. Blood flow is labeled with Texas Red dextran. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The liver has been actively studied by many groups3,10, due to importance of its function. For instance, Heymann et al. suggested a delicate method using agarose. Although this method was found to be highly precise, the agarose setting takes time. However, with our methodology, all procedures could be carried out within 30 min, minimizing other confounding factors. Second, stabilizing the liver is extremely important because the heartbeat can disturb the video. To eliminate this phenomenon, we repositioned the mice into the right decubitus position.
Another critical step in this protocol was production of the metal cover frame and its location on the metal bar. The most important obstacle that we faced was to determine how to overcome the friability of the liver in accordance with liver fixation using an appropriate amount of pressure. Initially, when only the butterfly nuts were applied to hold the cover slide, the blood circulation was impeded, and the liver was unable to endure the weight of the cover slide. Instead, we devised a method to roll down the bolts prior to placing the cover slide along the bar. Since the cover slide was supported by bolts, it gave some space for the liver thickness and hereby, did not press down hard into the liver and yet maintained the balance and fixation. Using LysM-GFP mice6, we confirmed that this design could allow visualization of neutrophils in sinusoids and central veins. CX3Cr1-GFP mice5 were also used in this model in order to observe LCMs. LCMs were frequently found on the surface of the liver.
The height of the liver pedestal or the silicon bed, was also essential. If it was too high, blood circulation in the liver would be disrupted. When the height of the liver pedestal was too low, it was difficult to maintain stable fixation of the liver. Because all mice had different body sizes, we produced silicon beds that had different heights using a 6-well plate, similar to that used for cell culture. In this way, we were able to customize the chamber according to the size of each mouse. In summary, we designed a novel and simple protocol for intravital imaging of mouse liver to investigate the morphology and motility of immune cells in the liver under inflammatory conditions.
This new protocol could be very helpful to researchers in this field who want to observe acute immune response of the liver. However, with this method, researchers cannot conduct long-term imaging for longer than 6 h due to liver fixation with tissue glue. This protocol is a one-time only method, and therefore, mice should be immediately sacrificed after imaging. When the liver is detached from the silicon bed, the liver will eventually be stripped off from the bed, resulting in excessive bleeding. Therefore, re-insertion and suturing of the abdominal area is impossible for future observation.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This study was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korea government (MSIP; grant no. 2016R1A2B4008199 to Y-M. H.), and the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI14C1324).
Custom designed chamber | Live Cell Instruments | Custom-designed size | |
Metal cover slide | Live Cell Instruments | Custom-designed size | |
Cover glass | Electron Microscopy Sciences | #72204-03 | |
Sylgard 184 Silicone elastomer kit | Dow Corning | ||
Erlenmeyer flask | DURAN | 21 216 36 | |
Cell culture plate (Flat type) | HYUNDAI Micro Co. | H31006 | |
Desiccator | ADARSH | 55204 | |
High Q BOND SE 5 mL | BJM LAB | To make semi-permanent dam | |
Flexible Silicone Rubber Heaters | Omega | SRFR/SRFG SERIES, M1250/0800 | |
DC power supply | Toyotech | DP30-03A | |
Phosphate-buffered saline | Home-made | ||
Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from Salmonella enteria serotype enteritidis | Sigma-Aldrich | L6011 | |
Texas Red Dextran | Thermo Fisher Scientific | D1830 | |
15 mL High-clarity polypropylene conical tube |
FALCON | 14-959-49B | |
0.45 μm filter (Minisart Syringe Filter) | Sartorius | 16555k | |
1.5ml Micro Tube, Amber | Axygen | MCT-150-X | For light-blocking |
1 mL syringe | Korea Vaccine | KV-S01 | |
3 mL syringe | Korea Vaccine | KV-S03 | |
10 mL syringe | Korea Vaccine | KV-S10 | |
0.3 mL insulin syringe | Becton Dickinson | 324900 | |
Hair removal cream 100 mL | Body natur | ||
Cotton swab | ABDI | ||
Zoletil 50 5 mL | Virbac | ||
Rompun 10 mL | Bayer | ||
Heating plate | Live Cell Instruments | PH-S-10 | Custom-designed size |
DC controller | Live Cell Instruments | CU-301 | |
Microdessection Scissors | Harvard Apparatus | 72-5418 | |
Scissors | Roboz | RS-5882 | |
Forceps | Roboz | RS-5137 | |
Vet bond | 3M | 1469SB | |
ZEN software (Black Edition) | Carl Zeiss | Program for LSM 7 MP | |
LSM 7 MP | Carl Zeiss | ||
Volocity | PerkinElmer | Analysis program |