This detailed protocol describes transcranial stimulation electrode placement on the temporal bone in order to investigate the short- and long-term effects of transcranial electrical stimulation in freely moving rats.
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is a powerful and relatively simple approach to diffusely influence brain activity either randomly or in a closed-loop event-triggered manner. Although many studies are focusing on the possible benefits and side-effects of TES in healthy and pathologic brains, there are still many fundamental open questions regarding the mechanism of action of the stimulation. Therefore, there is a clear need for a robust and reproducible method to test the acute and the chronic effects of TES in rodents. TES can be combined with regular behavioral, electrophysiological, and imaging techniques to investigate neuronal networks in vivo. The implantation of transcranial stimulation electrodes does not impose extra constraints on the experimental design while it offers a versatile, flexible tool to manipulate brain activity. Here we provide a detailed, step-by-step protocol to fabricate and implant transcranial stimulation electrodes to influence brain activity in a temporally constrained manner for months.
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is a valuable methodological approach to influence brain activity in a temporally constrained manner. Depending on the size and placement of the stimulation electrodes, TES can affect large brain volumes and entrain neuronal populations diffusely1,2,3. Transcranial direct current stimulation is already medically approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder4,5, and many studies focus on showing the cognitive effects of transcranial stimulation in humans6,7. Furthermore, promising results were reported regarding the potential of TES in controlling epileptic seizures8,9.
Despite the intensive research, there are still many open questions regarding the detailed mechanism of action, potential side-effects, and the long-term outcome of applying this method10,11,12. Therefore, it is critically important to have a robust, reproducible protocol to investigate the effects of TES in animal models. Given that many disorders (e.g., depression, epilepsy, and schizophrenia) can only be extensively investigated in awake animals, and the nature of these medical conditions usually necessitate long-term treatment, we provide a protocol for chronic implantation of transcranial electrodes in rats. The method presented here can be used for behavioral studies or can be combined with implantation of recording electrodes (i.e., wires, silicone probes, juxtacellular electrodes) or with chronic cranial windows for electrophysiological experiments and imaging studies, respectively. Depending on the experimental design, the timing of the stimuli can be either random or event-triggered to specific behavioral cues, or to the electrophysiological hallmarks of the particular brain states (seizures, theta oscillations)8,11,13.
It is important to mention that in contrast to the currently used human approach, which uses an embodiment of electrodes placed on the skin, here we show a method that employs subcutaneous implantation right over the surface of the temporal bone, since rats barely tolerate anything placed on their skin which is easily accessible using their paws.
In line with the principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement, due to the chronic nature of implantation, this method helps to reduce the number of animals, since each animal can be recruited in different experimental conditions for months, allowing the use of fewer animals to test various hypotheses.
In the present study, we provide a detailed, step-by-step protocol of transcranial stimulation electrode manufacturing (Figure 1A-B) and demonstrate the chronic implantation of these electrodes over the temporal bones of a six-month-old male Long-Evans rat.
All methods described here are in accordance with the directives of the European Communities Council (86/609 ECC) and have been approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Research at the Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical and Pharmaceutical Center of the University of Szeged (XIV/218/2016).
1. Fabrication of the Stimulation Electrodes
2. Fabrication of the Recording Electrodes
3. Anesthesia
4. Implantation of the Stimulation and Recording Electrodes
NOTE: Autoclave all the necessary surgical instruments and carefully follow the general rules of asepsis and antisepsis during the whole procedure. Avoid touching nonsterile areas outside of the surgical area. Immerse the electrodes in ethyl alcohol (70%) for 30 min before implantation.
The implantation of chronic stimulation electrodes (Figure 1B) can be combined with additional implantation of recording electrodes (Figure 1C-D). Such settings are suitable to form on-demand recording and stimulation systems to interfere with specific brain activities. Here we present representative results of a closed-loop epilepsy detection and intervention system, applied on Long-Evans rats expressing spontaneous seizures (Figure 2A)9. This strain is known to show the electrographic and behavioral symptoms of absence (petit mal) epilepsy (Figure 2B). In case of an epileptic seizure, as the recorded intracortical signals are analyzed in real-time, a trigger is sent to an isolated stimulus generator at the appropriate moment to interfere with the spike-and-wave activity of the brain. In turn, the stimulus generator delivers a charge-balanced, triphasic stimulus through the bitemporal stimulation electrodes in order to interrupt the seizure activity.
Figure 2C–D shows the capacity of the temporally targeted stimuli to interrupt ongoing seizures from week 1 to week 16, demonstrating the robustness and reliability of the implanted stimulation electrodes. To put these results in context, Figure 2E displays the recordings of an aborted experiment, where secondary tissue penetrated between the temporal bone and electrode surface due to the improper sealing and cementing of the electrodes (autopsy of the animal confirmed the tissue invasion). Besides increasing the impedance of the stimulation electrodes, the growing tissue is likely to provide an electric shunt. This experiment highlights the utter importance of careful isolation to achieve reliable and reproducible results during stimulation experiments.
Figure 1: Steps of stimulation and recording electrode fabrication. (A) Twisted wires stitched through the holes and fixed to the packaging before wrapping the peeled wires into the cavities. (B) Final form of the stimulation electrodes. Inset: wrapped wires inside the packaging; (C) Side view of the recording electrodes; (D) Top view of the recording electrodes. Inset: Tip of the recording sites, 400 µm spacing. (E) Intraoperative picture of the transcranial stimulation electrode placement. The stimulation electrodes are already implanted, together with some of the anchoring screws. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Representative results of closed-loop seizure intervention using the stimulation electrodes of this protocol. (A) Closed-loop system overview. Triplet recording electrodes are implanted in the parietal cortex and stimulation electrodes are placed bitemporally on the skull. The rat is equipped with an on-head amplifier and connected to a real-time seizure detection system. (B) LFP trace of an uninterrupted spike-and-wave seizure (C and D) Example LFP traces of seizure intervention on the 1st and 16th week of stimulation. (E) Example of failure of seizure interruption in case of tissue growing between the stimulation electrodes and the temporal bone (confirmed by autopsy) Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The most critical step of this protocol is the gluing of the electrode package on the bone surface. In case of improper sealing, a gap is formed between the electrodes and the bone, and secondary scar tissue can grow into this gap, which lessens the quality of stimulation. The bone surface must be completely dry during the steps of sticking on the package, and in the case of experiencing instability of the electrodes, it must be removed and replaced with a new package to gain the best results.
A limitation of this method is that as the skin is not completely closed after the surgery, there is a relatively higher risk of infection. Post-operative care in the first 4 – 5 days during the recovery with disinfectant solution, and later with powder, helps to prevent infection. In our experience, this treatment facilitates the formation of scar-tissue, which can completely close the wound towards the external world.
Here we presented one of the cheapest, most accessible methods of electrode fabrication, but depending on the special needs of the particular experiments, modification of the conductive material may be necessary, e.g., coating the surface of the cables with non-polarizing electrode interface materials, e.g., PEDOT:PSS. The electrode package can be custom-made, 3D-printed, and modified by the experimenters, in case our recommendations do not match the requirements of a particular study. In our experience, the size of the transcranial electrodes fabricated in this study allow implantations in both male and female rats above 300 g of bodyweight, but the size of the stimulation electrodes can easily be reduced by cutting smaller strips in protocol step 1.3. Furthermore, all the glues and dental cements given in the protocol can be replaced with substitutes, considering that the outer layer is in direct contact with the tissues, therefore they should be bio-compatible.
In the present study, we provided a protocol for bitemporal stimulation electrode fabrication and implantation, which is technically simple to perform, cost effective, and reliable over the long-term, allowing electrical stimulation experiments on freely moving rats9. As the stimulation electrodes are placed on the temporal bone, the whole horizontal skull surface is preserved for other implantations. This method can be combined with regular electrophysiological15,16, optogenetic17, and imaging18 techniques, providing the possibility of a versatile combination of experimental protocols.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by EU-FP7-ERC-2013-Starting grant (No.337075), the 'Momentum' Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2013-62), and the GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00018 grant. We thank Máté Kozák for documenting the stimulation and recording electrodes and Mihály Vöröslakos for the fruitful discussions during protocol design.
Cyanoacrylate liquid | Henkel | Loctite 401 | |
Cyanoacrylate gel | Henkel | Loctite 454 | |
Wire for stimulation electrodes | Phoenix Wire Inc. | 36744MHW – PTFE Microminiature Hook-Up Wire | |
Board spacer | E-tec Interconnect | SP1-020-S378/01-55 | |
Connector | E-tec Interconnect | P2510I-02 | |
Tape packaging for stimulation electrodes | Nexperia | 74HC1G00GW | Tape packaging of any integrated circuit with SOT-353 case can be used |
Grip Cement Industrial Grade | Caulk Dentsply | 675571 (powder) 675572 (solvent) | |
Electroconductive gel | Rextra | ECG Gel | |
Recording electrode wire | California Fine Wire Co. | .002 (50 micron) Tungsten 99.95% (CFW Material #: 100-211), HMl-Natural, cut to 3.0 inch pieces, Round, Cut length piece wire | |
Ultrafine scissors | Hammacher Instrumente | Stainless HSB 544-09 | |
Stainless steel tube | Vita Needle Company | 29 RW, 304SS Tubing, T.I.G. Welded and Plug | |
High speed rotary saw | Dremel | Model # 395 | |
Rotary saw holder | Dremel | Model # 220 | |
Rotary saw cut-off wheel | Dremel | Model # 409 | |
Ocular sticks | Lohmann-Rauscher | Pro-ophta Ocular Sticks | |
Wet disinfectant | Egis | Betadine | |
Dry disinfectant | Wagner Pharma | Reseptyl-urea | |
Drilling machine | NSK-Nakanishi United Kingdom | Vmax35RV Pack | |
Anchoring screws | Antrin Miniature Specialties, Inc. | 000-120×1/16 SL BIND MS SS |