This protocol describes how to prepare and perform clear native gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis (CN-GELFrEE), a native separation technique for non-covalent biomolecular assemblies and proteins from heterogeneous samples that is compatible with various downstream protein analysis techniques.
Protein complexes perform an array of crucial cellular functions. Elucidating their non-covalent interactions and dynamics is paramount for understanding the role of complexes in biological systems. While the direct characterization of biomolecular assemblies has become increasingly important in recent years, native fractionation techniques that are compatible with downstream analysis techniques, including mass spectrometry, are necessary to further expand these studies. Nevertheless, the field lacks a high-throughput, wide-range, high-recovery separation method for native protein assemblies. Here, we present clear native gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis (CN-GELFrEE), which is a novel separation modality for non-covalent protein assemblies. CN-GELFrEE separation performance was demonstrated by fractionating complexes extracted from mouse heart. Fractions were collected over 2 hr and displayed discrete bands ranging from ~30 to 500 kDa. A consistent pattern of increasing molecular weight bandwidths was observed, each ranging ~100 kDa. Further, subsequent reanalysis of native fractions via SDS-PAGE showed molecular-weight shifts consistent with the denaturation of protein complexes. Therefore, CN-GELFrEE was proved to offer the ability to perform high-resolution and high-recovery native separations on protein complexes from a large molecular weight range, providing fractions that are compatible with downstream protein analyses.
The majority of biological processes happening within a cell are thought to be carried out by protein assemblies rather than single proteins1. Consequently, in order to elucidate the specific biological role of a protein subunit in a cell it is necessary to understand its structural interactions with other proteins or ligands in complexes2. However, studying proteins natively, maintaining their non-covalent interactions and activity, remains challenging. One of the shortcomings of native protein studies is a suitable native separation technique that is compatible with various downstream protein analysis techniques. Therefore, recent interest in separation techniques capable of characterizing non-covalent assemblies of biomolecules has increased sharply3.
Protein separation techniques are imperative to biochemistry, biophysics and various other studies. Current native separation techniques have intrinsic deficiencies that reduce compatibility with downstream analyses, such as low resolution, low throughput, loss to precipitation, and the requirement of large amounts of initial sample. Tandem affinity purification is commonly used for protein interaction studies, but it has to be carried out separately for each protein target, causing it to be incompatible with high-throughput analysis4. Size exclusion chromatography5, selective precipitation with ion affinity chromatography5 and density-gradient separation6 all have provided native separations, but are inherently low-resolution techniques and require high initial sample amounts.
Alternatively, gel-based techniques, such as Blue Native (BN) and Clear Native (CN) PAGE (either 1-D or 2-D), display high-resolution separation. Furthermore, contrasting with other techniques mentioned, both native PAGE separations maintain solubility and native conformation of a broad range of macromolecule species, including hydrophobic proteins. This capability further broadens the proteome coverage reached by these methods7,8 and is achieved through different chemistry between CN and BN-PAGE. CN-PAGE commonly relies on soft charged detergents as carrier molecules, replacing the Coomassie Blue dye in BN-PAGE. BN-PAGE, although associated with higher resolution, has caveats such as reduced enzymatic activity in the separated proteins8 and Coomassie molecule adduct formation, the latter being greatly prejudicial to downstream MS analyses9. Both these methods, however, are traditionally associated with low recovery and narrow proteome coverage due to staining and gel extraction limitations7.
For the study of denatured proteins, there are several techniques that maintain macromolecule solubility while performing high-resolution fractionation with high protein recovery and that are compatible with diverse post-separation protein analysis techniques. Gel-Eluted Liquid Fraction Entrapment Electrophoresis (GELFrEE) is one of the fractionation techniques that fit all these characteristics. This method is largely applied in high-throughput top-down proteomics studies, indicating that it is fast and versatile. In GELFrEE, proteins are denatured and separated based on molecular weight through a tubular gel matrix, the porosity of which can be varied based on sample requirements and the desired fractionation results. Fractions are eluted in liquid phase, thus reducing the recovery limitations associated with SDS-PAGE while maintaining high resolution. Fraction aliquots can then be analyzed by 1-D PAGE for molecular-weight bandwidth selection11. There is high demand for the advantages associated with GELFrEE in native separation techniques. The method described herein, Clear Native GELFrEE (CN-GELFrEE), is a native adaptation of GELFrEE. In order to be compatible with a broad spectrum of macromolecules in their native state, this method relies not only on the soft CN-PAGE chemistry, but also on a porosity gradient separation, which reduces protein precipitation by eliminating the harsh transition between porosities present in discontinuous gel systems9. When applied to fractionate protein complexes extracted from mouse heart, eluted fractions displayed high recovery and a high-resolution separation of a wide range of molecular weights was obtained. Further, the resulting fractions are compatible with most downstream biochemical and biophysical protein analyses.
Note: This video protocol is based on an associated publication9. Specific reagents, material and equipment necessary to perform all the steps described in this protocol are listed in the materials section. The recipes and information for preparation of all required solutions are itemized in Table 1.
1. Pouring of Gradient Tube Gels
2. Sample Preparation
3. CN-GELFrEE Device
Figure 1: CN-GELFrEE device. (A) GELFrEE device parts drawings and (B) photograph of manufactured parts; (C) CN-GELFrEE device assembly scheme: (1) buffer chamber, (2) spacer, (3) O-ring, (4) gel tube, (5) collection chamber, and (6) dialysis membrane.
Table 1: Table of solutions.
Table 2: Table of GELFrEE device parts.
200 µg of proteins extracted from cryogenically ground mouse hearts were fractionated natively into 14 fractions of 150 µl each, using the CN-GELFrEE method in a 1-12% T gel tube. An aliquot of 10 µl of each fraction was run on a CN-PAGE slab gel and silver stained. A clear depiction of the fractionation and resolution obtained with CN-GELFrEE fractionation is shown in Figure 2A. Fractions were collected over two hours and the gel assay shows a consistent pattern of increasing molecular weights ranging from ~30 to 500 kDa. Each fraction contains species ranging in mass over ~100 kDa. Fractions display a low overlap of molecular-weight-ranges that is increasingly reduced as more collections happen between fractions. The CN-PAGE slab gel shown here represents only 6% of the protein recovered from each 150 µl fraction.
Each of the fractions eluted natively from CN-GELFrEE were subsequently reduced and denatured prior to running them on an SDS-PAGE slab gel. In the reducing SDS-PAGE slab gel (Figure 2B), it is possible to see mass shifts in all fractions when compared to the respective native fractions (Figure 2A), indicating that intact protein complexes were disassembled and disulfide bridges were reduced.
Figure 2: CN-GELFrEE separation of mouse heart cryogenic grinding extract. (A) Clear Native PAGE of CN-GELFrEE fractions collected at time intervals 0 to 120 min. Left: native molecular-weight ladder. (B) Reducing SDS-PAGE of same fractions as A. Left: reduced and denatured molecular-weight ladder.
Fractions can then be cleaned and submitted to native mass spectrometry analyses9. Native MS spectrum of the homodimeric malate dehydrogenase, identified in some of the GELFrEE fractions, shows a charge distribution between 16+ and 20+ and a molecular mass of 72,843 Da (Figure 3A). The 18+ charge state was isolated and collisionally-activated, resulting in the ejection of monomeric malate dehydrogenase with a molecular mass of 36,421.7 (Figure 3B). Source activation was applied to the intact complex in order to induce monomer ejection, allowing isolation and further fragmentation of the monomers. The fragmentation map of the 11+ monomer can be observed in Figure 3C. CN-GELFrEE was proven to be compatible with mass spectrometry analyses, showing no disruption of the noncovalent protein−protein interactions of macromolecular assemblies.
Figure 3: Mass spectra and fragmentation map of the homodimer malate dehydrogenase. (A) MS1 spectrum of the intact complex, (B) MS2 spectrum exhibiting monomer ejected from the complex, and (C) a fragmentation map obtained from the fragmentation of the monomer. The red N indicates that the N-terminal is acetylated.
CN-GELFrEE is derived from the clear native (CN) PAGE buffer system that uses a mixture of anionic and neutral detergents as carrier molecules9 for molecular-weight-based protein fractionation through a gel matrix. The application of CN-GELFrEE to a native mouse heart protein extract generated low complexity fractions with discrete bandwidths while maintaining non-covalent interactions of biomolecular assemblies. Comparison of fractions between CN-PAGE and reducing SDS-PAGE slab gels showed mass shifts that demonstrate loss of non-covalent interactions between macromolecules in the fractions and breakage of disulfide bonds between protein chains. The results confirm the native character of the CN-GELFrEE separation.
Some steps in this protocol are critical and thus warrant more attention. First, after casting, the gel tube should be detached from the device slowly and the external polyacrylamide cut carefully. Failure to do so can damage the gel, causing air bubbles within the mesh or detaching the gel from the glass tube. These damages impair the separation resolution and should be thoroughly avoided. Secondly, during the electrophoresis, the electric resistance of the system will increase overtime, generating heat, thus it is very important to either perform the procedure in a cold chamber or to move the device to an ice bucket after the sample has been loaded in the gel, in order not to denature the loaded proteins by heat. Furthermore, it is important to mind some key limitations of the technique when performing the described protocol. High protein loads can reduce CN-GELFrEE resolution. Overloading, especially of samples where a few species are more abundant, will cause those protein species to be eluted through a number of consecutive fractions. For mouse cryogenically ground samples, the best results were seen with amounts between 200 and 400 µg, but this behavior is sample-dependent. Also, high levels of salt in the sample will alter the electrophoretic properties of proteins, altering the band pattern and reducing the fractionation resolution. These critical steps and limitations should be accounted for during the performance of this protocol to achieve better results.
Furthermore, CN-GELFrEE was shown to have multiple highly demanded characteristics in native chromatography. This simple separation method achieves high-resolution fractionation of protein complexes, accepting high amounts of protein load and fractionating through a wide range of molecular weights. CN-GELFrEE was also proven to be very versatile, being capable of fractionating biological samples from a large variety of organisms and different preparations9.
Moreover, the liquid fraction elution in this technique enables high protein recovery that is not observed in other gel-based native separations. In addition, unlike other methods that elute assemblies in liquid phase, CN-GELFrEE does not reduce sample concentration. In fact, the protocol described herein increases the concentration of each protein assembly by ~2-fold from sample to fractions. Finally, the liquid samples this method generates are readily compatible with various downstream biochemical and biophysical native-protein analyses, including mass spectrometry. After a single clean up step we were able to identify and characterize, through native mass spectrometry, unknown protein complexes in CN-GELFrEE fractions, further demonstrating the native fashion and compatibility between these techniques.
Similarly to denaturing GELFrEE, this novel native fractionation technique is also highly adaptable. The concentrations of casting solutions may be adjusted to create different gradient gels, in order to vary the molecular-weight range that is resolved during a run. Increasing the %T of the separation gel solutions results in high resolution of lower mass species while decreasing it improves separation of high molecular weight species. The collection times through which the experiment is carried out can also be adapted in order to optimize the molecular-weight bandwidths achieved in each fraction as needed. Extended experiment time above 120 min will generate even higher molecular-weight ranges than depicted in this protocol. In addition, reducing time between fraction collection can reduce the complexity in each fraction. Therefore, multiple parameters can be easily fine-tuned, optimizing the use of the technique to different studies.
In conclusion, CN-GELFrEE advantages occupy a gap in the field of native separation techniques presenting high-resolution separation in a wide-range of molecular weights, high protein recovery, and accepting high amounts of protein load. Finally, the resulting fractions are compatible with most downstream native and denaturing protein analysis techniques.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The W. M. Keck Foundation generously provided funding for this work. This material is based upon work supported by FAPERJ research grant 100.039/2014 from the government of Rio de Janeiro State – Brazil for R.D.M., Science Without Borders scholarship 88888.075416/2013-00 from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, under the government of Brazil, for H.S.S., the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under fellowship number 2014171659 for O.S.S., and by CNPq research grant 202011/2012-7 from the government of Brazil for L.H.F.D.V. P.C.H. is a recipient of a Northwestern University's Chemistry of Life Processes Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship Award.
Reagents | |||
30% acrylamide/bis solution, 37.5:1 | Bio-Rad | 161-0158 | This solution is neurotoxic. |
6-aminohexanoic acid (ε-aminocaproic acid) | Sigma-Aldrich | A2504 | This chemical is an irritant. |
Ammonium persulfate (APS) | Fisher Scientific | 7727-54-0 | This chemical is flammable, toxic, and corrosive. |
Coomassie blue G250 | Bio-Rad | 161-0406 | |
Dodecylmaltoside | Sigma-Aldrich | D4641 | This chemical is an irritant. |
Ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA) | FLUKA | 3777 | This chemical is toxic. |
Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) | Fisher Scientific | BP120 | This chemical is toxic. |
Glycerol | Fisher Scientific | 56-81-5 | |
Imidazole | Sigma-Aldrich | I2399 | |
Liquid nitrogen | Any supplier | n/a | Store liquid nitrogen in containers designed for low-temperature liquids |
Mouse heart | Bioreclamation LLC | MSE-HEART | |
n-butanol | Fisher Scientific | 71-36-3 | This chemical is flammable and toxic. |
Ponceau S | Sigma-Aldrich | BP103 | |
Protease Inhibitor Cocktail | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 78430 | This chemical is toxic. |
Sodium deoxycholate | Sigma-Aldrich | 30970 | This chemical is an irritant. |
Sucrose | JTBaker | 4097 | |
Tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) | Bio-Rad | 161-0800 | This chemical flammable and irritant. |
Tris-HCl | Amresco | M151 | |
Trycine | Bio-Rad | 161-071 | |
Name | Company | Catalog Number | コメント |
Equipment | |||
Gradient mixer | Hoefer | SG15 | |
Magnetic stir | Any supplier | n/a | |
Magnetic bars | Any supplier | n/a | Small enough to fit inside the gradiet mixer chambers. |
Power supply | Bio-Rad | 164-5056 | Voltage up to 1,500 V |
Refrigerated centrifugue | Eppendorf | 022622552 | Up to 15,000 x g |
Name | Company | Catalog Number | コメント |
Materials | |||
15 mL conical tube | Any supplier | n/a | |
30-kDa-MWCO ultra centrifugal filter | Millipore | UFC503096 | |
Flexible tubing | Saint-Gobain | B000FOV1J0 | Approximately 1 m length |
Ice bucket | Any supplier | n/a | |
Liquid/air metallic or plastic valve. (e.g. aquarium air/water flow control lever valve) | Any supplier | n/a | Aquarium valves are compatible. |
Mortar and pestle | Any supplier | n/a | |
Native PAGE 3-12% T slab gel | Invitrogen | BN1003 | |
Parafilm | Bemis | PM-996 | |
Petri dish | Fisher Scientific | 08-757-13 | |
Protein low bind tube 1.5 mL | Eppendorf | 022431081 | |
Razor blade | IDL Tools | TE05-091C | |
Regenerated cellulose dialysis tubing 3,500 MWCO | Fisher Scientific | 21-152-9 | |
SDS-PAGE slab gel for any kDa | Bio-Rad | 456-9036 | |
Serological pipets (25 ml) | VWR | 89130-900 | |
Syringe (10 ml) | Any supplier | n/a |