Here, we provide an optimized protocol for the isolation and cloning of the scarce T-cell entity of peripheral Vδ1+CD4+ T cells that is, as we showed recently, an extrathymic αβ T-cell progenitor. This technique allows to quantitatively isolate, clone and efficiently expand these cells in ex vivo culture.
The thymus, the primary organ for the generation of αβ T cells and backbone of the adaptive immune system in vertebrates, has long been considered as the only source of αβT cells. Yet, thymic involution begins early in life leading to a drastically reduced output of naïve αβT cells into the periphery. Nevertheless, even centenarians can build immunity against newly acquired pathogens. Recent research suggests extrathymic αβT cell development, however our understanding of pathways that may compensate for thymic loss of function are still rudimental. γδ T cells are innate lymphocytes that constitute the main T-cell subset in the tissues. We recently ascribed a so far unappreciated outstanding function to a γδ T cell subset by showing that the scarce entity of CD4+ Vδ1+γδ T cells can transdifferentiate into αβT cells in inflammatory conditions. Here, we provide the protocol for the isolation of this progenitor from peripheral blood and its subsequent cultivation. Vδ1 cells are positively enriched from PBMCs of healthy human donors using magnetic beads, followed by a second step wherein we target the scarce fraction of CD4+ cells with a further magnetic labeling technique. The magnetic force of the second labeling exceeds the one of the first magnetic label, and thus allows the efficient, quantitative and specific positive isolation of the population of interest. We then introduce the technique and culture condition required for cloning and efficiently expanding the cells and for identification of the generated clones by FACS analysis. Thus, we provide a detailed protocol for the purification, culture and ex vivo expansion of CD4+ Vδ1+γδ T cells. This knowledge is prerequisite for studies that relate to this αβT cell progenitor`s biology and for those who aim to identify the molecular triggers that are involved in its transdifferentiation.
In vertebrates, adaptive immunity that is structured in the cellular and a humoral part of immunity plays a major role in the defense against pathogens. The recognition of a wide range of antigens is mediated by hyperpolymorphic T- and B cell receptors (TCR/BCR), which with regard to T cells are assumed to be produced mainly in the thymus1. Thereto, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), derived from bone marrow, seed the thymus and differentiate along well-defined stages finally giving rise to all T cell lineages. Thymus seeding progenitors are CD4– and CD8– and thus constitute the immature, double negative (DN) thymocyte fraction. Thymus-derived signals then induce their lineage commitment and the differentiation into either αβ or γδ T cells. The expression of functionally rearranged TCR-γ and TCR-δ chain genes in DN2/3 thymocytes leads to γ δTCR complexes, which drive cellular proliferation and promote differentiation into γ δT cells2,3. In contrast, the rearrangement of a functional TCR-β chain, that can pair with preTα to build a preTCR pT, induces the transcriptional silencing of the TCR-γ chain in DN3 thymocytes and their transition into CD4+CD8+ double-positive thymocytes4. At this stage, recombination of the TCR-α chain occurs, deleting the TCR-δ locus that nestles within the TCR-α locus, thus abrogating the production a γδTCR in these cells irrevocably5-9. Rearranged αβTCRs are subsequently selected for their ability to bind self-MHC weakly (positive selection), which may not exceed a certain threshold to avoid autoimmunity (negative selection). According to their capacity of binding MHC class I or II, the selected αβT cells develop into single-positive CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, which exit the thymus as naïve T cells.
However, involution of the thymus starts early in life leading to exponentially reduced output of naïve T cells that is almost extinguished post-adolescence10. Nevertheless, the size of the T cell pool remains constant throughout life, which can be explained only in part by post-thymic homeostatic proliferation of T cells and the proliferation of long-lived immunologic memory11. Consequently, extrathymic T cell development must occur. Recent research has gained substantial attraction that characterized αβT cell progenitors, which-at extrathymic sites-gave rise to functional αβ T cells12-17. Yet, detailed knowledge about extrathymic αβT cell precursors that independent from a thymus differentiate into αβT cells is as fragmentary as the background that we have on the route they take thereby.
We recently identified the small T-cell entity of Vδ1+ CD4+γδT cells as an extrathymic αβT cell prognitor18, which when isolated from peripheral blood of healthy human donors can transdifferentiate into αβT cells in a mild inflammatory environment. Interestingly and contrary to the homeostatic proliferation of post-thymic T cells, transdifferentiation of Vδ1 CD4+ cells generates new T cell receptors, thus broadening the repertoire diversity, so that potentially new antigens can be recognized and may protection the host against newly acquired pathogens. This adds to the plasticity of T cells and adds a so far unappreciated new pathway for extrathymic T cell development.
The quantitative isolation from lymphocytic sources, the generation of single-cell clones and their efficient expansion are essential for the objective to identify those markers and molecules that trigger this αβT cell precursor`s extrathymic development.
Ethic Statement: All procedures were carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Clinical Ethics Committee at the University of Tübingen (projects 38/2009B02 and 470/2013B02).
1. Isolation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)
2. Isolation of Vδ1 T Cells
3. Isolation of Vδ1CD4+ T Cells
4. Single-cell Cloning by Limited Dilution
Figure 1 depicts the different stages and the outcome of the isolation of Vδ1 T cells from peripheral blood. Figure 1A shows a typical distribution of Vδ1+ cells in CD3+ lymphocytes, as well as the co-receptor expression of the Vδ1+ population. In this donor, the frequency of Vδ1+ cells (red) is 2.3% of total lymphocyte counts and the CD4 expression (green) of Vδ1+ lymphocytes is 2.6%. Altogether, the target population for isolation represents 0.06% of total lymphocytes in this donor. Figure 1B shows an optimal staining intensity for Vδ1+ cells before proceeding to the magnetic labeling. Staining with the primary antibody should result in clearly distinct Vδ1negative and Vδ1positive populations so that the Vδ1+ cells can efficiently be labeled and separated with the magnetic beads. Figure 1C depicts Vδ1+ cells after the isolation procedure by FACS analysis. The purity of Vδ1+ is usually >99% of CD3+ cells. To increase purity, isolated cells are applied onto a second isolation column. This results in considerable cell loss however this steps leads to quantitative elimination of potentially contaminating TCRαβ + CD4+ cells.
The results of the CD4+ isolation are shown in Figure 2. Due to the low numbers of CD4+ Vδ1+ cells, and since the cells are expanded in a limited dilution single-cell cloning approach purity of CD4+ cells less than 100% can be tolerated. In the experiment shown here, the purity of the Vδ1+CD4+ cells was about 90% (Figure 2A, right blot) and subsequent single-cell cloning resulted in more than 60 Vδ1+CD4+ T cell clones. Contrarily, in the Vδ1+CD4– fraction no CD4+ cells remained (Figure 2B), which highlights the efficiency of this isolation strategy. Of note, the CD4+ cells (blue) express Vδ1 at a distinguishable lower level than CD4– cells (red) (Figure 2A, both blots). Thus, staining of Vδ1+ cells must be excessive-as described in the protocol-for a sufficient labeling and successful isolation of the CD4+ fraction within the Vδ1+ T cell pool.
In Figure 3A, the typical phenotype of an emerging clone is presented. The TCR is composed of a Vδ1 and a Vγ9 chain and the clonal cells express CD3 and CD4. Figure 3B depicts the process of transdifferentiation of one clone isolated with the presented technique. Transdifferentiation includes the downregulation of the V´1-chain to a low expression level, which is paralleled by the de novo expression of an αβTCR. This leads to a transient TCR-double-positive phenotype which eventually gives rise to single-positive αβTCR-expressing T cells. The co-receptor expression may also change during the course of transdifferentiation. Similar to thymocytes, a CD4+CD8+ DP phenotype may occur, which eventually develops into either SP CD4+ or CD8+ αβ T cells. Under the culture conditions presented here, transdifferentiation is a rare event-only one out of 50 clones changed their Vδ1+ TCR into αβTCR.
Figure 1. FACS analyses monitoring all stages of the isolation process of Vδ1 T cells from peripheral blood. (A) Distribution of Vδ1+ cells (red) in CD3+ cells of peripheral blood lymphocytes and their co-receptor expression. CD4+ Vδ1+ cells are indicated in blue (circle). (B) Staining of the Vδ1 fraction before proceeding to magnetic labeling. (C) FACS analysis of Vδ1+ cells of positive fraction after isolation. Numbers indicate percentage of gated cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. FACS analyses of Vδ1 CD4+ isolates. (A) CD4+ fraction and (B) CD4– fraction after CD4+ cell isolation. Numbers indicate percentage of gated cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Phenotypic analysis of a clone right after detection. (A) TCR composition and co-receptor expression of a freshly isolated clone. Vδ1 and Vγ9 TCR is co-expressed with CD3 and CD4. (B) Process of transdifferentiation in a CD4+ Vδ1+ clone. Change of TCR expression (top), and change of co-receptor expression (bottom)18. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
To study the phenotype, biology and function of a scarce (T-) cell entity, namely Vδ1+CD4+ T cells, we used two markers: Vδ1 and CD4 for its positive magnetic cell isolation. Vδ1 is an orphan receptor, whereas CD4 is expressed on T helper cells, at a lower level on monocytes and dendritic cells, and at a very low level on hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Techniques for the enrichment and selection of cells in high purity include Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), a technique that separates a population of cells into sub-populations based on fluorescent labeling. Cells stained using fluorophore-conjugated antibodies can be separated from one another depending on which fluorophore(s) they have bound. Sorters can achieve purity close to 98%19, which is useful if the only necessity is the sorting itself. Drawbacks of this technique include that sorted cells show a decrease in cell viability, and in our target population also a reduced potential for transdifferention. A reduced cell viability after sorting is hypothesized to be due to the shearing forces and hydrodynamic stress that the FACS imposes upon cells. Moreover, to keep cells viable and without contamination for subsequent culture, the experiment should be undertaken in aseptic sterile conditions which is hard to manage. In addition, FACS sorting recommends high numbers of cells for sorting.
Isolation Kits have been developed from several companies for direct magnetic labeling and the sorting of cells according to multiple surface markers. Their strategy relies on the removal of the magnetic label from the cells after the first sort by using a release reagent, which either enzymatically or competitively removes the magnetic label from the structure to which it was bound. This allows a second magnetic labeling and separation of the cells for another surface marker of interest that is achieved by using either direct or indirect labeling with magnetic beads. Removal of the label recommends working at low temperatures (on ice, at 2-8 °C) for extended periods of time, exposure to a chemical and repeated washing steps. If the target cells of the second parameter separation are present in a low concentration after selection (<10% target cells in the positive fraction after the first separation) even a second round for removal ofany residual magnetically labeled cells is needed. This procedure is-besides having a substantial loss of target cells due to repeated washing steps-at high risk for inducing cellular damage and loss of function due to mechanical and physiological stressors. Compared with FACS sorting however cell preparations remain sterile and smaller cell numbers can be sorted.
The strategy that we pursue combines two consecutively executed positive selections, yet the removal of the first label is not required as the magnetic labels differ in the magnitude of their magnetic forces by several log phases. While the first anti-fluorochrome magnetically-labeled bead type is small, with a diameter of 50 nm, the second anti-fluorochrome magnetically-labeled bead type measures 1 to 4.5 µm, thus exceeding the volume/strength of the first magnetic label 20 to 90-fold. Additionally, the second positive sort omits cell stress, that is associated with magnetic column retention/release as cells remain in an 1.5 ml vial that is put in a magnetic device so that labeled cells are attached to the wall of the vial. Washing procedures can be kept on a small scale. This elaborated protocol reduces cell loss and increases cell viability since cells experience less manipulation and pass the isolation process faster than protocols using multisort isolation kit systems.
Consequently, this protocol allows to separate even a small number of cells and another advantage: sorted cells remain sterile throughout the procedure. Subsequent cloning experiments using limiting dilution allows the efficient expansion of individual members of the isolated cells, here the very scarce Vδ1+CD4+γδ T cell entity18. Sorted cells show excellent viability and clonogenicity and remain fully functional.
For future applications, use this strategy to quantitatively select and successfully purify small T cell entities from diverse human sources including freshly drawn peripheral blood, (mobilized) leukapheresis products, cord blood and bone marrow by combining two consecutively performed positive selections using magnetic labels that differ by magnitude in their magnetic forces and thus retention capacity.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Christian Welker is funded by a grant provided by the Jürgen-Manchot-Stiftung.
Biocoll Solution | Biochrom | L 6113 | lymphocyte separating solution |
Lysing Buffer | BD BioSciences | 555899 | lysis of erythrocytes |
Phosphate-buffered Saline | Sigma Aldrich | D8537 | |
MACS buffer | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-091-222 | supplement with BSA and pre-cool before use |
BSA | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-091-376 | not mandatorily from this supplier |
anti-human Vd1 FITC (clone: TS8.2) | Thermo Scientific | TCR2730 | not mandatorily from this supplier |
anti-human CD3 PerCP (clone: SK7) | BD BioSciences | 345766 | not mandatorily from this supplier or this flurochrome |
anti-human TCRab PE (clone: T10B9.1A-31) | BD BioSciences | 555548 | not mandatorily from this supplier or this flurochrome |
anti-human CD4 VioBlue (clone: M-T466) | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-097-333 | not mandatorily from this supplier or this flurochrome |
anti-human CD8 APC-H7 (clone: SK1) | BD BioSciences | 641400 | not mandatorily from this supplier or this flurochrome |
Anti-FITC MultiSort Kit | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-058-701 | yields better results than anti-FITC MicroBeads |
MS columns | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-042-201 | pre-cool before use |
MiniMACS Separator | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-042-102 | |
CD4 Positive Isolation Kit | life technologies | 11331D |