Patch-clamp recordings and simultaneous intracellular biocytin filling of synaptically coupled neurons in acute brain slices allow a correlated analysis of their structural and functional properties. The aim of this protocol is to describe the essential technical steps of electrophysiological recording from neuronal microcircuits and their subsequent morphological analysis.
The combination of patch clamp recordings from two (or more) synaptically coupled neurons (paired recordings) in acute brain slice preparations with simultaneous intracellular biocytin filling allows a correlated analysis of their structural and functional properties. With this method it is possible to identify and characterize both pre- and postsynaptic neurons by their morphology and electrophysiological response pattern. Paired recordings allow studying the connectivity patterns between these neurons as well as the properties of both chemical and electrical synaptic transmission. Here, we give a step-by-step description of the procedures required to obtain reliable paired recordings together with an optimal recovery of the neuron morphology. We will describe how pairs of neurons connected via chemical synapses or gap junctions are identified in brain slice preparations. We will outline how neurons are reconstructed to obtain their 3D morphology of the dendritic and axonal domain and how synaptic contacts are identified and localized. We will also discuss the caveats and limitations of the paired recording technique, in particular those associated with dendritic and axonal truncations during the preparation of brain slices because these strongly affect connectivity estimates. However, because of the versatility of the paired recording approach it will remain a valuable tool in characterizing different aspects of synaptic transmission at identified neuronal microcircuits in the brain.
Neuronal microcircuits between two synaptically coupled neurons are the building blocks of large-scale networks in the brain and are the fundamental units of synaptic information processing. A prerequisite for the characterization of such neuronal microcircuits is to know the morphology and functional properties of both the pre- and postsynaptic partner neurons, the type of the synaptic connection(s) and its structure and functional mechanism. However, in many studies of synaptic connections at least one of the neurons in a microcircuit is not well characterized. This results from the relatively unspecific stimulation protocols often used in studies of synaptic connectivity. Therefore, the structural and functional properties of the presynaptic neuron are either not identified at all or only to a rather small extent (i.e., the expression of marker proteins etc.). Paired recordings in combination with intracellular staining by markers such as biocytin, neurobiotin or fluorescent dyes are better suited for studying small neuronal microcircuits. This technique allows one to investigate many structural and functional parameters of a morphologically identified synaptic connection at the same time.
So-called ‘unitary’ monosynaptic connections between two neurons have been investigated in both cortical and subcortical brain regions1-10 using acute slice preparations. Initially, sharp microelectrodes were used in these experiments; later, patch clamp recording was employed in order to obtain recordings of synaptic signals with a lower noise level and an improved temporal resolution.
A significant technical advance was the use of infrared differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) optics11-14, a microscopic technique that significantly improved the visibility and identification of neurons in the brain slice so that it became possible to obtain recordings from visually identified synaptic connections15-17. In general, paired recordings are done in acute slice preparations; only very few publications are available reporting recordings from synaptically connected neurons in vivo18-20.
The most important advantage of paired recordings is the fact that a functional characterization can be combined with a morphological analysis at both the light and electron microscopic level (see e.g.,7,16,21). After histochemical processing, the dendritic and axonal morphology of the synaptically connected neuron pair is traced. Subsequently, it is possible to quantify morphological features such as length, spatial density, orientation, branching pattern etc. These parameters may then provide a basis for an objective classification of a specific synaptic connection. Furthermore, in contrast to most other techniques used for studying neuronal connectivity, paired recordings also permit the identification of synaptic contacts for unitary synaptic connections. This can be done directly using a combination of light and electron microscopy16,21-27 or using calcium imaging28,29 of dendritic spines. However, with the latter approach only excitatory but not inhibitory connections can be studied as it requires calcium influx via the postsynaptic receptor channels.
In addition to a detailed analysis of synaptic transmission at a defined neuronal microcircuit paired recordings also allow the study of synaptic plasticity rules30,31 or – in combination with agonist/antagonist application – the modulation of synaptic transmission by neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine32 and adenosine33.
All experimental procedures have been carried out in accordance with the EU Directive for the Protection of Animals, the German Animal Welfare Act (Tierschutzgesetz) and the Guidelines of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association.
1. Set-up for Electrophysiology
Before commencing with paired recording, an electrophysiology set-up has to be built. A brief outline how such a set-up is assembled is given below:
2. Brain Slice Preparation
3. Paired Patch-Clamp Recording and Biocytin Filling
Depending on the type of synaptic connection three different approaches are used to find synaptically coupled neurons. If the connection probability is low (as can be expected for most excitatory connections), proceed as follows:
4. Histochemical Processing
5. Neuronal Reconstruction and Synaptic Contact Localization
Paired recordings are the method of choice for an in-depth characterization of morphologically identified uni- or bidirectional synaptic connections as well as gap junction (electrical) connections (Figure 1). An example of a paired recording in layer 4 of the somatosensory barrel cortex is shown in Figure 1A. Both unidirectional excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections can be characterized (Figure 1B,C). Furthermore paired recordings allow to record from bidirectional synaptic connections, i.e., from connections in which both neurons in a pair are pre- and postsynaptic to one another. This is illustrated in Figure 1D, which shows recordings from an inhibitory interneuron and an excitatory neuron. Eliciting an action potential in the excitatory neuron (red traces) results in an EPSP in the postsynaptic inhibitory interneuron (black traces). However, when an action potential is evoked in the interneuron, an IPSP can be recorded in the excitatory neuron. Figure 1E shows that it is also feasible to record from neurons coupled via gap junction or via a gap junction and a chemical synapse. Reciprocal and gap junction connections can only be identified by paired electrophysiological recordings so far but not by any other technique.
The combination of biocytin filling of coupled neurons via the patch pipette and the electrophysiological recordings allows a correlation of morphological properties of the neurons to synaptic properties. After histochemical processing neurons are visible as dark structures in the fixated slice (Figure 2A). Thereafter the recorded neuronal cell pair can be reconstructed morphologically and the neuronal cell types can be identified. Moreover, it is possible to identify the number and location of putative synaptic contacts (Figure 2A right panels and Figure 2B inset). The neuron pair shown in Figure 2B is reciprocally connected and hence synaptic contacts are established on both neurons. In our hands, putative, light microscopically identified synaptic contacts were confirmed as true synaptic contacts with the electron microscope with a 80 – 90% degree of accuracy16,21,26.
Figure 3 shows an example of a paired recording from a presynaptic pyramidal neuron in neocortical layer 6 of the barrel cortex and an excitatory spiny neuron in layer 4. This translaminar neuronal microcircuit has a low connection probability but can be identified using the searching procedure described in steps 3.1.1 – 3.1.9 for neuronal connections with a low connectivity. With the paired recording technique it is possible to identify synaptic connections with a very low connectivity as is the case of some long-range translaminar connections (this example) or connections between neurons located in different cortical ‘columns’ (inter-columnar synaptic connections).
Figure 1. Paired recordings from synaptically coupled cell pairs. (A) Left, IR-DIC image of a brain slice. Right, an interneuron (top) and an excitatory neuron (bottom). (B) A presynaptic action potential (top) in an excitatory neuron elicits a monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) in another excitatory neuron (bottom). (C) An action potential (top) in a presynaptic inhibitory interneuron evokes a monosynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) in an excitatory neuron (bottom). (D) An action potential (top left) in a presynaptic excitatory neuron evokes an EPSP (bottom left) in an inhibitory interneuron. In turn, an action potential in the inhibitory interneuron (top right) elicits an IPSP in the excitatory neuron (bottom right). (E) A series of hyper- and depolarizing voltage steps elicited by current injections into a neuron (top left) is reflected in a gap-junction coupled second neuron (bottom left). In addition, a presynaptic action potential (top right) in the first neuron evokes an early small depolarization (spikelet, inset) followed by a late deep hyperpolarization (IPSP) in the membrane potential of the second neuron (bottom right). Scale bars in (B) apply also to (C). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Identification of synaptic contacts and morphological reconstruction of biocytin-filled cell pairs. (A) Left, low-power photomicrograph of a reciprocally coupled cell pair comprising a spiny stellate and a fast-spiking interneuron in layer 4 that were filled with biocytin during recording. Light microscopically identified putative excitatory synaptic contacts between the presynaptic spiny neuron and the postsynaptic interneuron are marked by green dots. Putative reciprocal inhibitory synaptic contacts are indicated by blue dots. Right, high-power images of synaptic contacts. Green open circles, excitatory contacts; blue open circles, inhibitory contacts. Layer borders were determined by the cytoarchitectonic structure of the stained brain slice under the low power microscope. (B) Neurolucida reconstruction of the same cell pair shown in (A) and Figure 1C. Blue, interneuron axon; red, interneuron soma and dendrite; green, spiny neuron axon; white, spiny neuron soma and dendrite. The inset shows the somatodendritic compartments of the pre- and postsynaptic neurons together with the putative synaptic contacts. Barrel contours were identified in the low power bright-field photomicrographs made from the acute brain slice. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. A representative synaptic connection with very low connectivity ratio. (A) A presynaptic action potential (top) in a layer 6 pyramidal cell evokes a monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potential (bottom) in a layer 4 star pyramidal neuron. Notice the long latency (>3.0 msec) of this trans-laminar connection compared to that of local intra-laminar connections (≈1.0 msec). (B) Postsynaptic response of layer 4 star pyramidal neuron to two action potentials at 10 Hz elicited in a layer 6 pyramidal cells. Note the short-term facilitation of this connection compared to the short-term depression of local connections (data not shown). (C) Extended depth of focus imaging of the same connection as in (A,B). Inset, the somato/dendritic domain of a layer 4 star pyramidal neuron. Note the presence of a prominent apical dendrite marked by an arrow. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
mM | g/L | |
NaCl | 125 | 7.305 |
KCl | 2.5 | 0.186 |
Glucose | 25 | 4.5 |
NaHCO3 | 25 | 2.1 |
NaH2PO4 | 1.25 | 0.173 |
CaCl2 | 2 | 0.294 |
MgCl2 | 1 | 0.095 |
Osmolarity ~310 mOsmol/L | ||
Gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 |
Table 1. Artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) for perfusion during recording.
mM | g/L | |
NaCl | 125 | 7.305 |
KCl | 2.5 | 0.186 |
Glucose | 25 | 4.5 |
NaHCO3 | 25 | 2.1 |
NaH2PO4 | 1.25 | 0.173 |
CaCl2 | 1 | 0.147 |
MgCl2 | 5 | 0.476 |
Myo-inositol | 3 | 0.54 |
Na-pyruvate | 2 | 0.22 |
Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) | 0.4 | 0.07 |
Osmolarity ~310 mOsmol/L | ||
Gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 |
Table 2. Extracellular solution for acute brain slices of immature animals.
mM | g/L | |
Sucrose | 206 | 70.51 |
KCl | 2.5 | 0.186 |
Glucose | 25 | 4.5 |
NaHCO3 | 25 | 2.1 |
NaH2PO4 | 1.25 | 0.173 |
CaCl2 | 1 | 0.147 |
MgCl2 | 3 | 0.286 |
Myo-inositol | 3 | 0.54 |
Na-pyruvate | 2 | 0.22 |
Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) | 0.4 | 0.07 |
Osmolarity ~310 mOsmol/L | ||
Gassed with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 |
Table 3. Extracellular solution for acute brain slices of mature animals (sucrose saline).
mM | g/L | g/50 ml | |
K-gluconate | 135 | 31.622 | 1.5811 |
KCl | 4 | 0.298 | 0.0149 |
HEPES | 10 | 2.384 | 0.1192 |
Phosphocreatine | 10 | 2.552 | 0.1276 |
ATP-Mg2+ | 4 | 2.028 | 0.1014 |
GTP-Na | 0.3 | 0.156 | 0.0078 |
Adjust pH to 7.3 with KOH | |||
Osmolarity ~300 mOsmol/L | |||
Add 3 – 5 mg/ml biocytin |
Table 4. Low chloride pipette solution.
mM | g/L | g/50 ml | |
Na-gluconate | 105 | 22.92 | 1.146 |
NaCl | 30 | 1.76 | 0.088 |
HEPES | 10 | 2.384 | 0.1192 |
Phosphocreatine | 10 | 2.552 | 0.1276 |
ATP-Mg2+ | 4 | 2.028 | 0.1014 |
GTP-Na | 0.3 | 0.156 | 0.0078 |
Adjust pH to 7.3 with NaOH | |||
Osmolarity ~300 mOsmol/L |
Table 5. High Na pipette solution for searching synaptically coupled neurons.
ratio | ml | |
reagent A | 1 | 0.15 |
reagent B | 1 | 0.15 |
10% Triton X100 | 1 | 0.15 |
0.1 M phosphate buffer | 97 | 14.55 |
Kept for 30 min in the dark before use |
Table 6. ABC solution for histochemical reaction.
weight | volume | |
3-3'-diaminobenzidine | 10 mg | – |
0.1 M phosphate buffer | – | 20 ml |
1% (NH4)2Ni(SO4)2 | – | 5 – 10 µl |
1% CoCl2 | – | 5 µl |
1% (NH4)2Ni(SO4)2 and 1% CoCl2 are added drop by drop while stirring the solution. |
Table 7. Solution for diaminobenzidine (DAB) reaction.
Paired recordings from synaptically coupled excitatory and/or inhibitory neurons are a very versatile approach for the study of neuronal microcircuits. Not only does this approach allow one to estimate synaptic connectivity between neuron types but also allows determining the functional characteristics of the connection and the morphology of pre- and postsynaptic neurons. Furthermore, agonist and/or antagonist can easily be applied to neurons in slice preparations. This allows one to study the effects of neuromodulators on the properties of synaptic transmission32 or an in-depth characterization of a defined unitary synaptic connection using, for example, quantal analysis of synaptic release16,17,38,39. Finding of chemical and/or electrical (gap junction) synaptic connections is the most critical step of this protocol. We have therefore listed different approaches for finding synaptic connections, depending on the connectivity ratio and its type (chemical/electrical).
A major disadvantage of slice preparations is the often substantial truncation of long-range axonal projections so that only small parts of the total axonal length of the axon are recovered. For some pyramidal cell types, the degree of truncation could up to 90% or even more when taking projections to other cortical areas or subcortical regions into account. This renders the slice preparation unsuitable for the study of synaptic connections between neurons the cell bodies of which are more than >300 µm apart. However, in acute slice preparations, local axonal projections, in particular those of local interneurons are generally recovered with a relatively low degree of dendritic and axonal truncation (~10% or less) because of the limited horizontal and vertically field span of their axonal arbors. Connections involving these types of neurons can therefore be characterized with a high degree of accuracy and reliability and yield largely correct connectivity estimates. With the exception of these local synaptic connections, absolute values for connectivity ratios between two neuron types obtained in slice preparations are highly problematic, in particular for neurons with large inter-somatic distances as in translaminar or non-local, long-range intralaminar synaptic connections. This problem is exacerbated when slicing conditions have not been optimized for a given synaptic connection at a defined age. For more realistic connectivity estimated novel methodologies such as dense electron microscopic reconstructions40 and structural axo-dendritic overlap41 have been developed. However, even these techniques have to take into account the high diversity of inhibitory interneurons and also excitatory neurons.
An additional problem with connectivity estimates is that distal synaptic contacts, e.g., those on apical tuft of pyramidal neurons, may escape detection. When measured at the soma the amplitude of their synaptic response is very small and is likely to disappear in the noise (Qi et al., 2014, in submission). However, this kind of problem is not restricted to the paired recording approach but will also occur with other techniques used to study synaptic connectivity.
In recent year light–induced activation of neuronal microcircuits (i.e., by photo-release of caged glutamate or by activation of channelrhodopsin) has been used to investigate neuronal connectivity, even on a larger scale42-52. However, with these optical approaches it is not possible to identify the structural properties of the presynaptic neuron type. Furthermore, the number and location of synaptic contacts established by a neuronal connection cannot be identified, at least not to date. Paired recordings, on the other hand, allow the characterization of both pre- and postsynaptic neuron types in a synaptic microcircuit. This is particularly important since many studies have shown that both GABAergic interneurons and excitatory neurons are highly diverse with respect to their morphology and synaptic physiology53-56. Thus, the identification of both pre- and postsynaptic neurons is a prerequisite for the description of a synaptic connection57. Finally, paired recordings permit the recording of different configurations of synaptic connection (reciprocal connections, coexisting gap junctions and chemical synapses). Therefore, the paired recording technique will remain an important approach for studying neuronal microcircuits.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We would like to thank all members of ‘Function of Neuronal Microcircuits’ Group at Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-2, Research Centre Jülich and the ‘Function of Cortical Microcircuits’ Group in the Dept. of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical School, JARA, RWTH Aachen University for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the DFG research group on Barrel Cortex Function (BaCoFun).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | コメント |
Amplifier | HEKA | EPC 10 USB Triple | with 2-3 preamplifiers |
Microscope | Olympus | BX51WI | with 2 camera ports and a 4× objective, a 40× water-immersion objective |
Camera | TILL Photonics | VX55 | infrared CCD camera |
Workstation | Luigs & Neumann | Infrapatch 240 | with a motorized x-y stage and a motorized focus axis for the microscope |
Micromanipulator | Luigs & Neumann | SM-5 | x-y-z manipulators for 2-3 preamplifiers |
Faraday cage | Luigs & Neumann | ||
Anti-vibration table | Newport Spectra-Physics | ||
Patchmaster | HEKA | ||
Microtome | Microm International | HM650V | |
Micropipette puller | HEKA | Sutter P-97 | |
Neurolucida system | Microbrightfield | with Neurolucida and Neuroexplorer softwares |