This protocol demonstrates the induction of a hemogenic program in human dermal fibroblasts by enforced expression of the transcription factors GATA2, GFI1B and FOS to generate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.
The cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying specification of human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) remain elusive. Strategies to recapitulate human HSC emergence in vitro are required to overcome limitations in studying this complex developmental process. Here, we describe a protocol to generate hematopoietic stem and progenitor-like cells from human dermal fibroblasts employing a direct cell reprogramming approach. These cells transit through a hemogenic intermediate cell-type, resembling the endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition (EHT) characteristic of HSC specification. Fibroblasts were reprogrammed to hemogenic cells via transduction with GATA2, GFI1B and FOS transcription factors. This combination of three factors induced morphological changes, expression of hemogenic and hematopoietic markers and dynamic EHT transcriptional programs. Reprogrammed cells generate hematopoietic progeny and repopulate immunodeficient mice for three months. This protocol can be adapted towards the mechanistic dissection of the human EHT process as exemplified here by defining GATA2 targets during the early phases of reprogramming. Thus, human hemogenic reprogramming provides a simple and tractable approach to identify novel markers and regulators of human HSC emergence. In the future, faithful induction of hemogenic fate in fibroblasts may lead to the generation of patient-specific HSCs for transplantation.
Definitive hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) emerge in the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) region and placenta from endothelial precursors with hemogenic capacity, through an endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition (EHT)1,2. Hemogenic precursors (HPs) express both endothelial and hematopoietic markers, but their precise identification remains elusive, particularly in the human system. Despite being a relatively conserved process in mammals, hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) development still differs significantly between humans and mouse models3,4. Therefore, in vitro approaches to recapitulate human HSC development are needed.
Differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) to HSCs, although promising, has met limited success over the past 20 years, mostly due to the available differentiation protocols, which result in primitive hematopoietic progenitors with poor engraftment ability5,6,7. Alternatively, direct cell reprogramming methodologies have been applied to generate HSPC-like cells from multiple cell types, using transcription factors (TFs)8,9. In particular, the overexpression of three TFs, Gata2, Gfi1b and cFos, converted mouse embryonic fibroblasts into HSPCs through an HP intermediate with a defined phenotype (Prom1+Sca-1+CD34+CD45-)10. This process resembled the EHT that occurs in the embryo and placenta, during specification of definitive hematopoiesis. This phenotype enabled the identification and isolation of a population of HPs in the mouse placenta that after short-term culture and Notch activation generated serially transplantable HSCs11.
So far, no phenotype has been established that distinguishes human HSCs from their precursors, but some molecules are known to be expressed in emerging HSCs. Integrin alpha 6 (ITGA6 or CD49f) is highly expressed in long-term repopulating HSCs, the most immature cells in the HSC compartment12, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE or CD143) is present in CD34 negative hematopoietic precursors in embryonic blood-forming tissues13.
Recently, we have demonstrated that human versions of the three TFs, GATA2, FOS and GFI1B reprogram human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) into HPs with short-term engraftment capacity14. In the initial phases of reprogramming, GATA2 engages open chromatin and recruits GFI1B and FOS to repress fibroblast genes and activate endothelial and hematopoietic genes. Induced cells highly expressed CD49f and ACE, and contained a small percentage of cells expressing the HSPC marker CD34. The CD9 gene, which is expressed in HSCs15 and is important for HSC homing16, was shown to be a direct target of GATA2 and among the most up-regulated genes in reprogrammed cells14. CD9 may therefore constitute an additional marker for HPs of human definitive hematopoiesis.
In this protocol, we describe the generation of HSPC-like cells from human fibroblasts through enforced expression of GATA2, GFI1B and FOS, as well as an adapted method for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-sequencing (seq) analysis at the onset of reprogramming. TFs were encoded in a doxycycline (DOX)-inducible lentiviral vector (pFUW-tetO) that contains a tetracycline response element (TRE) and a minimal CMV promoter, and were transduced together with a constitutive vector containing the reverse tetracycline transactivator protein (pFUW-M2rtTA). When DOX (analog of tetracycline) is added after transduction, it binds to the rtTA protein which interacts with the TRE allowing TF transcription (Tet-On system). The procedure requires 25 days to complete. For ChIP-seq experiments, HDFs were transduced with tagged versions of GATA2 (pFUW-tetO-3xFLAG-GATA2) and GFI1B (pLV-tetO-HA-GFI1B), plus pFUW-tetO-FOS and TF binding sites were analyzed two days after DOX supplementation.
Ultimately, hemogenic reprogramming of human fibroblasts provides an in vitro tractable system to study the mechanisms underlying human developmental hematopoiesis and a potential source of patient-specific HSPCs for future clinical application.
This protocol was performed according to Lund University's human research ethics committee guidelines and should be done in accordance with individual institutional guidelines.
1. Reagent Preparation
2. Human Dermal Fibroblast Isolation
NOTE: HDFs can be purchased from certified suppliers (Table of Materials). In that case, expand fibroblasts and use them directly in reprogramming experiments (section 4). Alternatively, HDFs can be isolated from donors. If fibroblasts are isolated from different donors, keep the samples separated from each other at all steps of the protocol. Label plates/wells and collection tubes with the identification number of each donor.
3. Lentiviral Production
4. Hemogenic Reprogramming
NOTE: Use HDFs with a passage number of three (P3) or higher (until P10) to perform reprogramming experiments.
5. Optimization of Fibroblast Expansion for ChIP-seq Analysis at the Onset of Hemogenic Reprogramming
A schematic representation of the reprogramming approach using HDFs is illustrated in Figure 1A. Fibroblasts are acquired from commercial sources or collected from human donors and expanded in vitro previous to reprogramming. After plating, cells are transduced twice with GATA2, GFI1B and FOS (and M2rtTA) lentiviruses, and doxycycline is added at day 0 of reprogramming. On day 2, cells are split and plated in hematopoietic medium until day 25 of culture. Reprogrammed cells may be generated at different time points for multiple applications including transplantation in immunocompromised mice, single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) of purified cell populations (day 2 unsorted, day 15 CD49f+ CD34 and day 25 CD49f+CD34+ cells), as well as microscopy and flow cytometry analysis for the cell surface markers CD49f, CD34, CD9 and CD143. Representative cytometry plots show ~17% of reprogrammed cells expressing both CD49f and CD9 (Figure 1B, left panel), after 25 days of reprogramming. The majority of double positive cells express CD143 (~86%), and a small population express CD34 (0.9%), suggesting a dynamic hemogenic fate induction. These markers are not activated in M2rtTA transduced HDFs cultured for 25 days (Figure 1B, right panel). Immunofluorescence images confirm expression of CD9 and CD143 in adherent and round cells, morphologically distinct from fibroblasts that are negative for these markers (Figure 1C). Human hemogenic colonies also express CD49f and CD3414. ScRNA-seq analysis of HDFs, day 2 unsorted cells, and purified reprogrammed cells at day 15 (CD49f+CD34–) and day 25 (CD49f+CD34+) show a stepwise increase in CD49f, CD9 and CD143 expression from day 2 to day 25. CD49f and CD9 positive cells appear first during the reprogramming process, between day 2 and 15, indicating that these molecules may represent markers of early human hemogenesis. CD143 expression starts to be detected at day 15 and CD34 expressing cells are detected only at later time points (day 25). CD34+ umbilical cord blood (UCB) cells were used as reference (Figure 1D).
Figure 2A describes a modified protocol to generate sufficient number of cells for ChIP-seq analysis at the initial stages of hemogenic reprogramming (day 2). First, HDFs are plated at a density two times higher than in the standard protocol (300,000 cells versus 150,000 cells per plate). After transduction, each well is re-plated into a 100 mm dish allowing cells to expand for 6 days before supplementing medium with DOX. Cells are analyzed 2 days after adding DOX and consequent TF expression. Figure 2B shows genome browser profiles of GATA2 binding to genomic regulatory regions of ITGA6 and ACE when cells are co-transduced with the three factors (3TFs) or GATA2 individually. GATA2 also binds to open chromatin regions of CD9 and CD34 genes14.
Figure 1: Induction of hemogenic fate in human dermal fibroblasts. (A) Experimental strategy for hemogenic reprogramming of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Fibroblasts from skin punch biopsies are collected from donors, expanded and transduced with GATA2, GFI1B, FOS and M2rtTA lentiviruses. Doxycycline (DOX) is added to the culture at day 0 of reprogramming and cells are analyzed at several time points until day 25. scRNA-seq, single cell RNA-sequencing. FACS, Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting. (B) Gating strategy used to evaluate the expression of hemogenic/hematopoietic markers by flow cytometry at day 25 after transduction with the three transcription factors (3TFs). Cytometry plots show percentage of double positive cells for CD49f and CD9, gated in the live-cell population (DAPI-negative). Within the double positive population, the expression of CD143 and CD34 is shown. HDFs transduced only with M2rtTA virus under the same culture conditions are used as control. (C) Immunofluorescence images of day 25 reprogrammed colonies confirming the expression of CD9 (upper panel) and CD143 (lower panel). Cells were stained with antibodies (Table of Materials) diluted 1:100 in PBS/2% FBS with mouse serum, incubated 20 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2, washed three times and imaged in PBS/2% FBS. Phase, phase-gradient contrast. Scale bars = 50 µm. (D) ScRNA-seq analysis of 253 cells at different time points. Expression of ITGA6, CD9, ACE and CD34 is activated during reprogramming. Cells are collected at day 2 (unsorted), day 15 (CD49f+CD34–) and day 25 (CD49f+CD34+). HDFs and CD34+ umbilical cord blood (34+UCB) cells are used as references. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Expansion of human dermal fibroblasts for ChIP-seq analysis. (A) Experimental strategy depicting a modified protocol to generate high numbers of transduced human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) for ChIP-seq at day 2 of reprogramming. 300,000 cells are plated in 6-well plates and transduced twice with individual factors (pFUW-tetO-FOS, pLV-tetO-HA-GFI1B or pFUW-tetO-3xFLAG-GATA2) or a combination of the three factors (plus M2rtTA). After removing viruses, fibroblasts are expanded for six days in 100 mm dishes. Doxycycline (DOX) is added at day 0 and cells are collected two days after DOX addition. (B) Genome browser profiles highlighting GATA2-binding sites (grey boxes) at ITGA6 and ACE loci two days after transduction with the three transcription factors (3TFs) or with GATA2 alone. The total number of mapped reads is represented on the y-axis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 1: Defining an optimized lentiviral volume for efficient hemogenic reprogramming. Increasing volumes of concentrated (10 to 100 μL) pool-produced lentiviral particles (3TFs: GATA2, GFI1B and FOS) are used to transduce human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs), together with M2rtTA at a ratio of 1:1, following steps 4.5−4.12 of the protocol. Reprogrammed cells are analyzed at day 25 to define an optimal volume of transduction for hemogenic reprogramming, given by the percentage of CD49f+CD9+ cells gated in live-cells (DAPI-negative). Cell viability can be assessed by quantifying the absolute number of live cells at day 25. HDFs transduced with M2rtTA (100 μL) are used as negative control. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 2: Morphology changes during hemogenic reprogramming of human dermal fibroblasts. Human Dermal Fibroblast (HDF) cultures are imaged at the day of the first transduction (day -2), when DOX is added to the cultures (day 0), two days (day 2) and fifteen days (day 15) after DOX supplementation, and at the end-point of the experiment (day 25). Hemogenic colonies at days 15 and 25 are highlighted. Scale bars = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In this article, a method is described to generate hematopoietic progenitor cells directly from human fibroblasts, which go through an HP cell intermediate, similarly to definitive HSCs14.
Pool-production of lentiviral particles encoding GATA2, GFI1B and FOS was preferred over individual production, since in our hands it results in higher reprogramming efficiencies (unpublished data). Lentiviruses, as members of the Retroviridae family, normally contain two copies of positive single-stranded RNA19. The increased reprogramming efficiency may be due to packaging of two different transgenes in the same lentiviral particle, resulting in increased number of cells co-transduced with the three transcription factors. To ensure the success of this protocol, it is necessary to transduce HDFs with adequate amount of virus depending on the cell passage to obtain an optimal balance between reprogramming efficiency and cell viability, as recommended in step 4.6. Moreover, fresh non-concentrated viruses can be used. It is recommended to transduce cells with 0.5-3 mL of 3TFs pool and M2rtTA. Also, cell density should be adjusted according to the application. 150 000 HDFs per 6-well plate (step 4.4) provided the optimal density to perform FACS, transplantation and flow cytometry analysis of reprogrammed cells. For ChIP-seq experiments, more cells were required from the beginning (step 5.1). It is important to check cells regularly for morphological changes and replace hematopoietic medium twice a week to support the emergence of induced hematopoietic cells. Addition of hematopoietic cytokines or co-culture in feeder layers may increase reprogramming efficiency.
With this method, we can identify new hematopoietic markers that are dynamically expressed during hemogenic reprogramming. CD9, which was shown to be up-regulated in reprogrammed cells at the transcriptional level14, is rapidly expressed at the cell surface in the initial phases of reprogramming together with CD49f and CD143, serving as a novel marker of human HSC precursors. We also show that ITGA6 and ACE are direct targets of GATA2 during the initial stages of hemogenic reprogramming, in addition to CD9 and CD3414, providing a direct mechanistic link between human hemogenic precursor phenotype and GATA2.
One advantage of this system resides in the use of relatively homogeneous fibroblast cultures. While PSCs are easily expanded and maintained in vitro, differentiation protocols generate heterogeneous populations that include hematopoietic progenitors, which engraft poorly5,6,7. Moreover, there is a risk of tumorigenesis when transplanting PSC-derived HSPCs, since undifferentiated PSCs may still remain in culture even after employing differentiation protocols. Alternatively to fibroblasts, direct reprogramming to HSCs has been applied to blood-committed progenitors20 and endothelial cells21. However, starting with blood-restricted progenitor cells hinders therapeutic application of the resulting HSCs if the patient carries mutations that affect the stem/progenitor hematopoietic population22. In the case of endothelial cells, these are more difficult to obtain compared to fibroblasts, and constitute a very heterogeneous cell population in terms of phenotype, function and structure, which are organ-dependent23. Other studies have succeeded in reprogramming mouse fibroblasts into engraftable hematopoietic progenitors24,25 yet, so far, no other protocol describes the generation of HSPC-like cells from human fibroblasts.
This approach, coupled with pharmacological inhibition, gene knock-out, or knock-down permits to define individual or combination of factors that are required to directly induce human HSCs. Employing high efficiency screening methodologies based on recent CRISPR-Cas9 technologies in HDFs prior to reprogramming, represents an exciting endeavor for defining novel regulators of human definitive hematopoiesis. In the future, reprogramming non-blood related human cell types such as fibroblasts will serve as a platform to generate healthy patient-tailored hematopoietic progenitor cells for clinical applications.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation, the Medical Faculty at Lund University and Region Skåne are acknowledged for generous financial support. This work was supported by a grant from Olle Engkvists Stiftelse (194-0694 to Filipe Pereira) and PhD scholarships from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PTDC/BIM-MED/0075/2014 to Filipe Pereira, and SFRH/BD/135725/2018 and SFRH/BD/51968/2012 to Rita Alves and Andreia Gomes). This study was also supported by funds from NIH and NYSTEM (1R01HL119404 and C32597GG to Kateri A. Moore).
0.45 μm low-protein binding filter, 150 mL Bottle Top Vacuum Filter | Corning | #430625 | |
2-Mercaptoethanol | Sigma-Aldrich | #M6250 | |
Alexa Fluor 488 anti-human CD34 clone 581 | BioLegend | #343518 | |
BD Pharmingen APC Mouse Anti-Human Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (CD143) clone BB9 | BD Biosciences | #557929 | |
BES buffered saline | Sigma-Aldrich | #14280 | |
Calcium chloride (CaCl2) | Sigma-Aldrich | #449709 | |
Centrifugal filter unit, Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Unit | Sigma-Aldrich | #UFC903096 | |
Dissociation solution, TrypLE Express Enzyme (1X) no phenol red | Gibco | #12604-021 | |
Doxycycline hyclate (DOX) | Sigma-Aldrich | #D9891 | |
eBioscience CD49f (Integrin alpha 6) Monoclonal Antibody (eBioGoH3 (GoH3)), PE-Cyanine7 | Invitrogen | #25-0495-82 | |
FUW-M2rtTA | Addgene | #20342 | |
Gelatin from Porcine Skin Type A | Sigma-Aldrich | #G1890 | |
Gibco L-Glutamine (200 mM) | ThermoFisher Scientific | #25030-024 | |
Gibco MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids Solution (100X) | ThermoFisher Scientific | #11140-035 | |
Hematopoietic medium, MyeloCult H5100 | STEMCELL Technologies | #05150 | |
Hexadimethrine bromide (polybrene) | Sigma-Aldrich | #H9268 | |
Human Dermal Fibroblasts (HDFs) | ScienCell | #2320 | |
HyClone Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) | GE Healthcare | #SH30243.01 | |
HyClone Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | GE Healthcare | #SV30160.03 | |
HyClone Penicillin Streptomycin 100X Solution (Pen/Strep) | GE Healthcare | #SV30010 | |
HyClone Phosphate Buffered Saline solution (PBS) | GE Healthcare | #SH30256.01 | |
Hydrocortisone | STEMCELL Technologies | #7904 | |
Mouse serum | Sigma-Aldrich | #M5905 | |
PE anti-human CD9 Antibody clone HI9a | BioLegend | #312105 | |
pFUW-tetO-3xFLAG-GATA2 | Addgene | #125600 | |
pFUW-tetO-FOS | Addgene | #125598 | |
pFUW-tetO-GATA2 | Addgene | #125028 | |
pFUW-tetO-GFI1B | Addgene | #125597 | |
pLV-tetO-HA-GFI1B | Addgene | #125599 | |
pMD2.G | Addgene | #12259 | |
psPAX2 | Addgene | #12260 |