This protocol describes an improved technique for the abundant collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with no contamination from blood. With greater sample collection and purity, more analyses can be performed using CSF to further our understanding of diseases that affect the brain and spinal cord.
The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a valuable body fluid for analysis in neuroscience research. It is one of the fluids in closest contact with the central nervous system and thus, can be used to analyze the diseased state of the brain or spinal cord without directly accessing these tissues. However, in mice it is difficult to obtain from the cisterna magna due to its closeness to blood vessels, which often contaminate samples. The area for CSF collection in mice is also difficult to dissect to and often only small samples are obtained (maximum of 5-7 µL or less). This protocol describes in detail a technique that improves on current methods of collection to minimize contamination from blood and allow for the abundant collection of CSF (on average 10-15 µL can be collected). This technique can be used with other dissection methods for tissue collection from mice, as it does not impact any tissues during CSF extraction. Thus, the brain and spinal cord are not affected with this technique and remain intact. With greater CSF sample collection and purity, more analyses can be used with this fluid to further aid neuroscience research and better understand diseases affecting the brain and spinal cord.
The CSF is a valuable body fluid for analysis in neuroscience research. The CSF is primarily made from blood plasma, containing few cells (no red blood cells and only a few white blood cells) and is almost protein-free. It is one of the fluids in close contact with the central nervous system (CNS) and it can pass many electrolytes out from the brain and spinal cord to the peripheral system. In humans, CSF samples can be collected to aid in diagnosing disease or for research purposes in clinical trials, as a spinal tap (or lumbar puncture) is a minor, invasive procedure: the CSF fluid can reflect changes in the CNS without having to directly access these tissues. Thus, in recent years, for research purposes in the clinic, CSF samples have been obtained from patients of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and other dementias1,2,3. There are many biomarker assays which have been developed using CSF samples to potentially aid in diagnosing diseases in the clinic2,3. However, there is much debate on the reliability of these assays to produce consistent, sensitive results to specifically diagnose disease4,5. So, there is a great need for the development of better assays and targets, which can be found in the CSF, to aid in producing a standard technique to diagnose neurodegenerative diseases with greater sensitivity and specificity. Due to the potential importance of human CSF samples in disease, the collection of CSF from rodents in neuroscience research is also of interest.
Mice are important animals in biological and medical research and allow for the testing of potential therapeutic compounds and proof-of-concept studies before human clinical trials. However, in mice it is difficult to obtain CSF samples due to its closeness to the brain in a small animal, as the usual method of CSF collection in mice is to obtain it via the cisterna magna, an opening between the cerebellum and dorsal surface of the medulla oblongata. This causes difficulty in collecting CSF samples as this area is difficult to dissect to and in close proximity to blood vessels, increasing the risk of contamination from blood cells. Due to these difficulties, most researchers can only obtain a small amount of CSF for analysis (usually stated as 5-7 µL) and the contamination of CSF samples by blood cells is a primary concern for analyses6,7,8,9. Blood contamination can obscure results and not truly reflect the state of the CNS. Furthermore, limited sample collected can impact research as the usual amount collected from mice is enough for only one measurement (in duplicate or triplicate) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Thus, CSF samples are usually pooled from multiple mice in order to have enough sample to run multiple assays. Developing a protocol for the abundant, uncontaminated collection of CSF from mice is greatly desired and will be beneficial in improving neuroscience research using rodents.
In this protocol, a technique for the abundant (an average of 10-15 µL) collection of CSF from anesthetized mice is described in detail and improves on a currently known method of CSF collection to minimize contamination from blood10. A robust protocol for CSF collection will aid in the development of CSF-based biomarker assays, which could be used to aid in diagnosing disease, as well as improve research into the mechanisms that underlie diseases affecting the CNS.
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the policies of the Society for Neuroscience (USA) and Fudan University (Shanghai, China) ethical committees. This procedure is for a non-survival surgery.
1. Setup of CSF Collection Apparatus
Figure 1. Microscope, micromanipulator, and capillary setup. (A) Microscope and micromanipulator with capillary attached setup, as well as a closer image of (B) the connected syringe and three-way valve to open (shown here) or close the piping, and (C) an unbroken (right) and broken (left) capillary tip ready for CSF collection. Once broken, the tip of the capillary should have an inner diameter of 0.75 mm, outer diameter of 1.0 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Mouse Dissection
Figure 2. Mouse and dissection setup with representative images of capillary insertion for CSF collection. Setup of mouse ready for CSF extraction with (A) shaved head clamped in place for dissection and (B) detailed image (10x view) of a dissected mouse dura covering the cisterna magna (dashed arrow shows a blood vessel running through the area and solid arrow shows area optimal for capillary insertion). Detailed images (10x view) of (C) sharpened tip of glass capillary aligned against dura of cisterna magna, (D) the point at which the capillary almost punctures the dura, with some resistance from dura, and (E) the capillary tip tapped through the dura to collect CSF. CSF should be a clear liquid collected in the glass capillary (dotted arrow). All scale bars at the bottom right of each microscope image indicate 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. CSF Collection from Anesthetized Mouse
Using the procedure outlined here (Figure 1 and Figure 2), the CSF immediately collected in the capillary should be clear (Figure 2E), not pink or red. If there is a pink to red tinge to the fluid collected in the capillary, then there was contamination with blood.
As an example of the application of the CSF sample collected with this method, levels of the protein amyloid-beta (Aβ) was measured using ELISA. Levels of Aβ in CSF is commonly measured in Alzheimer's disease research7. CSF is mostly protein-free. In a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (APP/PS1 mice), levels of human Aβ42 are significantly increased, as these mice overexpress human APP. This can be observed with the samples of CSF collected from 12-month-old mice using the methods described here (0 pg/mL in the CSF of wild-type (WT) mice compared to 1,303 pg/mL in the CSF of APP/PS1 mice, Figure 3).
Figure 3. Representative results for CSF sample collected. ELISA analysis of CSF sample collected. In a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (APP/PS1), there is a significant increase in levels of human Aβ42 in the CSF, as these mice overexpress human Aβ42 (1,303 pg/mL). In wild-type (WT) mice there should be no human Aβ42 detected (0 pg/mL). An unpaired t-test was used to measure significance, ** p < 0.01, error bars represented as SEM, n = 3 and 4 mice at 12 months of age respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This protocol describes in detail a technique which improves on current methods10 of CSF collection to minimize contamination from blood and allow for the abundant collection of CSF (on average ~ 10-15 µL can be obtained) from mice. When breaking the capillary tip, the tip of the capillary should not be too small (as then the CSF will be extracted very slowly) or too big (will not be fine enough to collect the CSF and tissue can become lodged in the capillary). Care should be taken when dissecting the area for CSF collection: any bleeding should be stopped and the area for insertion of the glass capillary cleaned from blood with dH20 to avoid contamination with the sample. The anatomy of each mouse is different, but most mice have 1-2 major blood vessels running through the area where the capillary needs to be inserted for CSF collection. Choosing the correct place for insertion of the capillary is important, as inserting too close to major blood vessels will contaminate the CSF with blood. As shown in Figure 2, an area clear of blood vessels, such as between or on either side of the major blood vessels, is optimal for capillary insertion to avoid contamination. If the CSF does not flow out at a steady rate and stops after some time, drawing the syringe a little (~ 50 µL) can help to restart the flow of CSF into the capillary. Alternatively, the capillary itself can be moved gently and slowly in or out of the mouse with the micromanipulator to restart the flow of CSF extraction. Care must be taken when doing these steps as blood can flow into the capillary as well. This technique works well due to the differences in pressure from the brain and glass capillary to draw out CSF from the mouse. Thus, the mouse can only be punctured once, as after the capillary is inserted into the mouse and taken out, there is a loss of pressure in the brain and CSF will no longer be drawn into the capillary automatically if it is inserted again. Therefore, practice will perfect this technique to produce no blood contaminants and obtain adequate CSF collection on the first insertion of the capillary into the mouse (from experience, 10-20 practice mice will be enough to reach this stage).
This protocol is an improved and efficient method for extracting CSF from mice and if done correctly, minimizes contamination from blood (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). This technique is limited by the time taken for CSF to be collected. Normally, 30 min is needed to collect ~ 15 µL or more of CSF at room temperature (~ 23 °C). During this time, the mouse can be kept warm with cotton wool or tissue, but without a covering or heat pad, CSF can still be successfully collected. Addition of a heat pad or warming the mouse before the procedure may improve this technique by increasing the flow of CSF out of the brain and reduce the time needed for collection, as described in other methods10,11. But in the protocol described here, no heat pad or warming of the mouse was used and between mice there was no difficulty in the amount of CSF that could be collected. As an example of the application this technique can be used for, levels of human Aβ42 were measured using ELISA. Aβ is known to be sticky and can adhere to glass and the collection tubes. In this protocol, borosilicate glass capillaries and polypropylene tubes were used to collect the CSF from mice. While some Aβ may stick to the glass capillary and walls of the collection tubes, the ELISA results show that Aβ levels can be measured (Figure 3). Nonetheless, it is a possibility that Aβ levels measured from the CSF collected in this protocol are less than that described by other studies, but the glass capillaries are necessary to puncture through the dura of the mouse to collect the CSF. Besides measuring Aβ, other proteins of interest can also be measured using the CSF collected.
While the previously published method of CSF collection by Liu et al.10 was meant for the continuous collection of CSF from living mice, the method described here is for the collection of CSF from mice to be sacrificed for tissue collection and analysis. Thus, this technique can be used along with other dissection methods for mouse tissue collection as it does not affect the brain and spinal cord, and after CSF collection (i.e., after 10-30 min for ~ 10-15 µL of CSF), the mouse should still be breathing and under anesthesia. Therefore, other tissues such as blood, brain, spinal cord, and liver are still viable for collection and biochemical analysis. Although the Liu et al. method collected CSF very quickly (10 min per mouse for 3-7 µL of CSF), the method described here takes a longer time but can collect more CSF10. Another method for CSF collection has also been described by Maia et al.11 Both the Liu et al. and Maia et al. methods describe collecting CSF from mice by hand-holding glass capillaries or gel loader tips and puncturing into the cisterna magna. The method described here differs by fixing the capillary to a micromanipulator. This ensures that the capillary is kept immobile and decreases contamination from blood during CSF collection. The micromanipulator also allows for greater precision and accuracy in puncturing the cisterna magna to obtain CSF. Although the Maia et al. method was also able to obtain 15-20 µL of CSF per mouse, it requires puncturing the cisterna magna repeatedly by hand with gel loader tips, which may increase the risk of contamination from blood or tissue. Furthermore, the Maia et al. method may decrease pressure in the brain with each sequential puncturing of the cisterna magna so that there is less and less CSF collected each time. The method described here involves only one puncture and leaving the capillary in the cisterna magna to further collect CSF as it refills with CSF while the mouse is under anesthesia. Thus, the protocol described here continuously collects CSF and minimizes possible contamination from repeated punctures into the cisterna magna as well as disruption of the surrounding tissue.
With greater CSF sample collection and purity, more analyses can be used with this fluid to further aid in neuroscience research. It is well known among researchers that the collection of CSF from mice can be tedious and only a limited sample can be obtained (usually stated as a maximum of 5-7 µL6,7,8,9). In the literature, there are not many detailed protocols published for CSF extraction and this protocol improves on a previously published method10 to minimize contamination from blood, while maintaining the abundant collection of CSF. CSF has many applications in neuroscience research and as one of the closest fluids to the tissues of the CNS, it is a valuable sample for research. It has been previously identified that an adult mouse has a total volume of 40 µL of CSF12. Thus, this protocol is able to obtain 25% and possibly more of the total amount of CSF in an adult mouse. Besides the inbred strains C57BL/6 and APP/PS1 mice, the outbred strain imprinting control region (ICR) mice have also been used to successfully collect CSF using this protocol. CSF from mice of various ages (4 to 18 months) has been successfully collected using this protocol. Thus, there should be no difficulty in collecting CSF from different strains or ages of mice with this method. This detailed protocol will hopefully be used by many to improve the development of CSF assays and other analysis techniques to aid in research to understand neurodegenerative diseases that affect the brain and spinal cord.
It is critical that the head of the mouse be fastened tightly, so it does not move during the dissection and CSF collection (Section 3 of the Protocol). The site for the initial puncture into the cisterna magna is important for obtaining abundant, non-contaminated CSF. The capillary should not be inserted too close to any blood vessels to avoid contamination of the sample collected. Furthermore, adjustment of the capillary is critical for optimal CSF collection. The use of the micromanipulator allows for fine adjustments to be made without greatly disrupting the surrounding tissue and contaminating the CSF. Using the fine controls of the micromanipulator, the capillary can be slowly moved in or out to allow for CSF to flow out from the mouse and into the capillary for collection.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81650110527, 81371400) and National Key Basic Research Program of China (2013CB530900).
Chloral hydrate (used as anesthetic) | Sinopharm Chemicals Reagen Co. Ltd. | 30037517 | CAS number 302-17-0. |
Dissecting scissors | 66 vision technology | 54002 | |
Dissecting curved forceps | 66 vision technology | 53072 | |
Dissecting straight forceps | 66 vision technology | 53070 | |
Mouse adapter (with ear bars) | Made in-house. | N/A | Similar equipment available from World Precision Instruments. |
Dissecting microscope | Meiji Labax | Model 15381 | |
Micromanipulator | World Precision Instruments | M3301 | |
Magnetic base for micromanipulator | Kanetec | MB-K | |
Glass capillaries | World Precision Instruments | 1B100-4 | |
Micropipette puller | Sutter Instruments | Model P-1000 | |
Syringes (1ml) | Tansoole | 02024692 | For 1ml. |
Microtubes (1.5ml) | Axygen | MCT-150-C | |
Protease inhibitor Cocktail Set III EDTA-free | Calbiochem | 539134 | |
Human Aβ42 ELISA kit | Invitrogen | KHB3441 | |
Piping (teflon tubing) | World Precision Instruments | MMP-KIT | Obtained from a microinjection kit and attached to the capillary holder and syringe. |
Mini centrifuge | Tiangen Biotech | OSE-MC8 | |
Cotton buds | Obtained from any household store/pharmacy. | N/A |