Working memory predicts a significant amount of variance for a variety of cognitive tasks, including speaking, reading, and writing. However, few tools are available to assess working memory in children. We present an innovative, computer-based battery that comprehensively assesses different components of working memory in school-age children.
The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM) is a computer-based battery designed to assess different components of working memory in young school-age children. Working memory deficits have been identified in children with language-based learning disabilities, including dyslexia1,2 and language impairment3,4, but it is not clear whether these children exhibit deficits in subcomponents of working memory, such as visuospatial or phonological working memory. The CABC-WM is administered on a desktop computer with a touchscreen interface and was specifically developed to be engaging and motivating for children. Although the long-term goal of the CABC-WM is to provide individualized working memory profiles in children, the present study focuses on the initial success and utility of the CABC-WM for measuring central executive, visuospatial, phonological loop, and binding constructs in children with typical development. Immediate next steps are to administer the CABC-WM to children with specific language impairment, dyslexia, and comorbid specific language impairment and dyslexia.
Working memory is the limited capacity system that enables an individual to mentally hold and manipulate incoming information while completing cognitive tasks5,6. Individual differences in working memory impact cognitive, scholastic, and professional performance in adults7,8 and children9,10. Despite the connection between working memory and learning, few diagnostic tools are available to comprehensively assess working memory in children11,12.
The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM) was designed to assess working memory at its most elemental level, as envisioned by multiple prominent working memory models, including those proposed by Baddeley and colleagues5,13,14 and Cowan and colleagues15,16,17. Baddeley14 proposes four separate working memory components: a central executive/attention controller that focuses, switches, and divides attention and links long-term and working memory; a visuospatial sketchpad that holds visual and spatial information; a phonological loop that holds speech-based and other acoustic information; and an episodic buffer that forms an interface among working memory components and binds information from subsystems and long-term memory. On the other hand, Cowan posits that working memory may be part of a larger, more unitary construct primarily guided by the focus of attention, in addition to central executive and phonological storage and rehearsal subsystems15,16,17. The CABC-WM includes 13 working memory tasks that measure the central executive (or focus of attention), visuospatial, phonological, and binding subsystems of working memory. We aimed for three measures of each construct to support the use of latent variables. Several of the tasks included in the CABC-WM were modeled after tasks originally designed for adults, who typically have a higher tolerance than children for complex tasks. We adapted the tasks to make them motivating for children by presenting them in a pirate-themed computer game with visually-appealing graphics, virtual rewards, and a touch-screen interface. We also limited the number of tasks presented in a single research session and the number of trials in each task to decrease the likelihood of fatigue. Finally, to increase the reliability of the battery, tasks were designed to be easy to administer and score. All tasks included standardized instructions presented by the computer as part of each game. Most of the tasks have automated scoring that reduces the opportunity for human error during data processing. Details of the tasks can be found in Table 1 and are described below.
Central Executive Tasks
N-back auditory, N-back visual, and number updating tasks assess central executive function. The N-back task is an updating task that presents a sequence of stimuli, after which subjects are asked to judge whether a stimulus is the same or different from the preceding stimulus. The N-back auditory task is presented in the context of a robot band playing different instruments with differing tones. Children listen to the tones in sequence. After each tone is heard the child decides whether the new tone is the same or different from the preceding tone and responds by pushing labeled same/different keys on the keyboard. Pilot data showed that a 1-back task was doable by elementary-age children. The N-back Visual task is presented in the context of robots playing a game with patterned game pieces. Each game piece is a black square with different patterns of white dots. Children see a series of individual game pieces. After each piece is shown, they decide whether the pattern is the same or different from the preceding piece and show their response by pushing labeled same/different keys on the keyboard. Again, pilot data showed that only a 1-back task was at the appropriate level for young children completing this battery. The number updating task assesses a child's ability to maintain information in working memory and to update it when additional information is provided. This task is presented in the context of a toy factory where the child's task is to keep track of the running total of yoyos and teddy bears manufactured. Initially, children are shown two digits to remember, one digit for the number of yoyos and the other for the number of teddy bears. The children are then shown an addition operation (e.g., +1, +2, etc.) for one of the digits, which they use to update the digit total. Children are given five operations in sequence before the numbers are reset and they begin again.
Phonological Working Memory
'Phonological working memory' is responsible for mentally holding and manipulating acoustic and speech-based information. Phonological working memory is assessed using 'digit span', 'digit span-running', and 'nonword repetition' tasks. The 'digit span' task requires children to repeat lists that vary in length from 2-8 digits. This task is presented to children in the context of playing a copycat game with a robot. The child repeats what the robot says, trying to remember as many digits in the sequence as possible. The 'digit span-running' task is presented in the context of playing a copycat game with sea monsters who read lists of numbers 7-10 digits in length; however, children do not know how many digits will be presented in a list. When the list is completed, the child is prompted to recall as many digits as possible, in forward order, from the end of the list. In the 'nonword repetition' task, children repeat novel words (e.g., 'genfad' and 'yitvodgoom'), which help the pirate build a candy bridge over a river.
Visuospatial Working Memory
'Visuospatial working memory' is the component of working memory that mentally holds and manipulates visual and spatial information. Visuospatial working memory is assessed with 'location span', 'location span-running', 'visual span', and 'visual span-running' tasks. The location span task requires children to remember the endpoint location of a series of arrows that direct a pirate to buried treasure. The locations are displayed in an array of eight dots radiating from the center of the screen at equidistant angles. After children see the series, they point to as many locations as they can remember in sequence. The 'location span-running' task is the same as the location span task except that children do not know how many locations will be presented. The 'visual span' task is similar to the 'location span' task. Children see a series of 1-6 individual black polygons (i.e., 'gems' in the context of the game) appear on the screen, one at a time. After seeing each series, six polygons appear in a line on the screen. Children select the order in which they appeared, using the touchscreen. The 'visual span-running' task is similar to the visual span task except that children do not know how many polygons will appear. At the end of the sequence, children recall the polygons in forward order. The span lengths vary from 3 to 6 polygons.
Binding Tasks
'Binding tasks' refer to the component of working memory that forms a temporary interface among the various working memory components (e.g., phonological and visuospatial) and binds information within and across these subsystems and long-term memory. Binding tasks include 'phonological binding span', 'visual binding span', and 'cross-modal binding'. The 'phonological binding span' task requires children to learn pairings of non-speech sounds (e.g., beeps and tones) with single-syllable nonwords (e.g., vope and meck). This task is presented in the context of robots speaking a special 'robot language' to order candy at a candy store. Children start by hearing one sound with one nonword in a sequence, but the task increases in difficulty until they hear up to four sound-nonword pairings in a sequence. The 'visual binding span' task requires children to remember two paired pieces of visual information, such as where individual polygons are located in a 4 x 4 grid. Span length increases from 1 to 6 polygons. After the last polygon in each trial has been displayed, an identical, blank 4 x 4 grid appears on the screen next to a field of the six optional polygons. Children use the touchscreen to select and drag the polygons to their proper location within the grid. Children are allowed to move polygons around the grid until they are satisfied with their selection. 'Cross-modal binding' requires the binding of auditory nonwords (e.g., koov and geem) with black polygon shapes. This task is presented in the context of learning the name of game pieces. As each individual polygon is shown in the center of the screen, children hear a 1-syllable nonword paired with that polygon. Each trial varies in the number of pairs presented, ranging from 1 to 6. After the last pair is presented, a selection screen showing the field of six polygons appears. Children hear each nonword, one at a time, and use the touchscreen to indicate the polygon that goes with that nonword. The nonwords are not replayed in the order in which they were presented.
CABC-WM Administration and Results
The protocol for administering the CABC-WM is described below. Following this, results of the CABC-WM measures and reported task reliability are provided for a sample of typically-developing children. The presented CABC-WM battery is administered on a desktop computer with a touchscreen monitor using a pirate-themed context for the games. The child sits directly in front of the touch screen. A research assistant sits beside the child to monitor the child's attention or need for breaks. The assistant also records data for the tasks that are not automatically recorded by the computer program (see below). At the conclusion of each task, the CABC-WM prompts the child to select the next task. After the last task has been completed in the research session, the CABC-WM concludes by allowing the child to purchase items for his pirate avatar in a virtual store.
All tasks begin with a set of training trials that the child is required to pass before proceeding to the test trials. If a child cannot pass the training trials after five attempts, the task is discontinued. Please see Table 1 for individual task details including: stimuli used, conditions, number of training trials and task trials, average task length, and dependent variables.
All procedures described below were approved by the human research ethics review boards at the participating institutions.
1. Preparation and Seating
2. Initial Instructions to the Subject
3. Selection of the Avatar
4. Central Executive Tasks
5. Phonological Working Memory Tasks
6. Visuospatial Working Memory Tasks
NOTE: At the start of each task, the CABC-WM narrator provides instructions to the child.
7. Binding Tasks
The CABC-WM was administered to 168 children with typical development who were enrolled in or had just completed second grade (mean age = 7; SD = 4.99 months). Children also met the following inclusionary criteria: a) had no history of neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g., ADHD or autism spectrum disorder), b) had no history of receiving special education services, c) spoke monolingual English, d) had not repeated a grade, e) had a standard score >30th percentile on the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation -2 (GFTA)18, f) had a standard score >87 on the core language composite of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Fourth Edition (CELF-4)19, g) had a 2nd grade composite standard score >95 on the Test of Word Reading Efficiency, Second Edition (TOWRE-2)20, and h) had a standard score >74 on the Nonverbal Index of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC)21. Table 2 presents the pass rates, means, standard deviations, and range of scores across each task. Some children did not complete all tasks. In some cases, this was due to equipment failure (about 4%) or because the child was unable to pass the training phase of a task. For children who successfully passed the training phase, we observed no floor or ceiling effects, suggesting that the tasks were developmentally appropriate for capturing a range of performances across children. Based on training success, the most difficult tasks to pass were 'digit span-running' and 'visual span-running', with pass rates of 70.7% and 80.4%, respectively. All other tasks were passed by at least 90% of the children.
Tasks of the CABC-WM have been used to test the fit of prominent models of working memory22. Based on confirmatory factor analyses, the tasks of the CABC-WM were used to define a final model of working memory that can best be described as a combination of Cowan's three-factor embedded processes model15,16 of central executive, focus of attention, and phonological storage and rehearsal with Baddeley and Hitch's three-factor model5 of central executive, visuospatial sketchpad, and phonological loop (see Figure 2). The first identified factor in the combined model, the central executive, included the n-back tasks and the updating task. The second factor was the focus of attention/visuospatial sketchpad. Tasks loading onto this factor included traditional visually based tasks, such as visual span and location span, but also included running tasks which, as described above, are those tasks that have an unpredictable list length that does not allow for rehearsal23,24. The third identified factor, the phonological storage and rehearsal/phonological loop, included those tasks involving speech and auditory stimuli, such as digit span, phonological binding, and non-word repetition. See Gray et al.22 for a complete review. These representative results confirm the utility of the tasks of the CABC-WM for measuring discrete components of working memory in the current sample of children.
Reliability
The reliability of the CABC-WM22 tasks were assessed by calculating split-half and split-third coefficients (which are special cases of the more general K-split coefficient25,26,27). A complete description of how we split items may be obtained from the first author. Reliability for each task is shown in Table 3. Most reliabilities were moderate to high in value, providing evidence that the majority of the individual tasks in the CABC-WM are reliable. The binding tasks showed lower reliabilities, which warrants further investigation.
Figure 1: Distribution of Working Memory Tasks Across the Islands of the CABC-WM. Island order and task order were randomized for each child. Tasks were distributed across islands to counterbalance presentation and to standardize the amount of time required for island completion. (Abbreviations: VSS: Visuospatial working memory; PL: Phonological working memory; CE: Central Executive; BT: Binding Tasks
Figure 2: Combined Model of Working Memory with Standardized Coefficients. This figure shows the factors and factor loadings for tasks of the CABC-WM. Standardized coefficients are presented in the figure. See Gray et al.22 for further details. (*Reprinted with permission from Gray et al.)22.
Task Name | Stimuli Used | Conditions or Trial Types | Number of Training Blocks and Trials (in parentheses) | Criterion for Passing Training | Number of Trials | Task Length (minutes) | Dependent Variable(s) |
Central Executive Tasks | |||||||
N-back Auditory (Updating) | • Tones • Image of robot band |
• Same • Different |
1 training block: • Same (3) • Different (3) |
4/6 | 54 (3 blocks each with 9 Same, 9 Different) | 6.5 | Mean accuracy for same and different trials combined |
N-back Visual (Updating) | • Images of black squares with white dots | • Same • Different |
1 training block: • Same (3) • Different (3) |
4/6 | 54 (3 blocks each with 9 Same, 9 Different) | 7.5 | Mean accuracy for same and different trials combined |
Number Updating (Updating) | • Visual presentation of numbers and operations | n/a | 2 training blocks: • Each block (5) |
5/5 each block | 15 (3 blocks each with 5 trials) | 7.2 | Mean accuracy for all trials |
Phonological Working Memory Tasks | |||||||
Digit Span | • Auditory recordings of digits 1-9 (except 7 because it is 2 syllables) | Span length (2-8 digits) | 1 training block: • 2 trials |
2/2 | 14 (2 trials at each span length from 2-8 digits) | 4.5 | Number of trials correct at each span length x span length, then sum products |
Digit Span – Running | • Auditory recordings of digits 1-9 (except 7 because it is 2 syllables) | Span length (7-10 digits) | 3 training blocks: • 3 trials |
At least 1 correct for each of 3 blocks | 12 (3 trials at each span length from 7-10) | 6 | Average number of digits recalled in the correct order |
Nonword Repetition | • Auditory recordings of nonwords | Word length (2-5 syllable nonwords) | 1 training block: • 3 2-syllable nonwords) |
3 attempted | 16 nonwords (4 at 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-syllable lengths) | 3 | Number of nonwords repeated with correct consonants at each syllable length x syllable length, then sum products |
Visuospatial Working Memory Tasks | |||||||
Location Span | • An arrow pointing toward a location arranged in a circular pattern | Span length (2-6 locations) | 3 training blocks: • 1 location (1) • 2 locations (2) |
At least 1 at 1 location and 1 at 2 locations | 12 (2 trials at each span length from 2-6 locations) | 4.5 | Number of trials correct at each span length x span length, then sum products |
Location Span Running | • An arrow pointing toward a location arranged in a circular pattern | Span length (5-8 arrows) | 3 training blocks: • 6 locations (1) • 7 locations (1) • 8 locations (1) |
1/1 correct at each length | 12 (3 trials at each span length from 5-8 locations) | 7.5 | Average number of locations correctly identified across all trials |
Visual Span | • Black polygons | Span length (1-6 polygons) | 1 training block • 1 polygon (1) • 2 polygons (2) |
3/3 | 12 (2 trials at each span length from 1-6 polygons) | 6.5 | Correct number of trials at each span length x span length, then sum products |
Visual Span – Running | • Black polygons | Span length (3-6 polygons) | 1 training block • 3 polygons (1) • 4 polygons (1) |
1 correct at each length | 12 (3 trials at each span length from 3-6 polygons) | 7 | Average number of polygons correctly identified in order across all trials |
Binding Tasks | |||||||
Phonological Binding Span | • Auditory non-speech sounds (e.g. mechanical noises) • Auditory recordings of nonwords |
Span length (1-4) | 1 training block • 1 sound-nonword pair (1) • 2 sound-nonword pairs (1) |
2/2 attempted | 20 sound/nonword pairings (2 trials each of 1-4 pairs per trial) | 5.2 | Correct number of trials at each span length x span length, then sum products |
Visual-Spatial Binding Span | • Image of a grid • Black polygons |
Span length (1-6 polygons) | 1 training block • 1 polygon (1) • 2 polygons (1) |
2/2 | 12 (2 trials at each span length from 1-6 polygons) | 5.2 | Correct number of trials at each span length x span length, then sum products |
Cross-Modal Binding | • Black polygons • Auditory recordings of nonwords |
Span length (1-6 polygons) | 1 training block • 1 nonword-polygon pair(1) • 2 nonword-polygons (2) |
2/2 | 12 (2 trials at each span length from 1-6 polygons) | 6.5 | Correct number of trials at each span length x span length, then sum products |
Table 1: Task Details for Working Memory Tasks Included in the CABC-WM. The table presents the stimuli used for each task, conditions tested, number of training trials, criteria for passing the training phase, number of task trials, average task length, and dependent variables for each task.
Type of task | Pass Rate (%)a |
N | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum |
Number updating (accuracy) | 91 | 155 | 0.8 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 1 |
N-Back Visual (accuracy) | 94.8 | 147 | 0.77 | 0.17 | 0.3 | 0.96 |
N-Back Auditory (accuracy) | 98.7 | 151 | 0.84 | 0.14 | 0.43 | 1 |
Location span (weighted sum) | 100 | 151 | 10.59 | 5.99 | 0 | 30 |
Location span running (mean) | 93.4 | 152 | 1.31 | 0.66 | 0.08 | 3.25 |
Visual span (weighted sum) | 90.1 | 150 | 6.75 | 5.74 | 0 | 27 |
Visual span running (mean) | 80.4 | 127 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 0.08 | 2.58 |
Digit span (weighted sum) | 100 | 150 | 19.4 | 6.91 | 4 | 42 |
Digit span running (mean) | 70.7 | 150 | 1.88 | 1.24 | 0.13 | 4.58 |
Nonword Repetition (weighted sum) | 100 | 153 | 11.42 | 6.3 | 0 | 42 |
Cross-Modal binding (mean) | 99.3 | 153 | 4.35 | 2.64 | 0 | 13 |
Phonological binding span | 99.3 | 149 | 12.04 | 6.89 | 0 | 35 |
(weighted sum) | ||||||
Visual binding (weighted sum) | 93.4 | 145 | 4.77 | 3.17 | 0 | 16 |
The percentages exclude data that were excluded because of equipment failure which occurred at a rate of 4.04% or participant issues which included withdrawal from the study or participant declining to complete an activity. |
Table 2: Performance on Each CABC-WM Task in Typically Developing Children in the 2nd Grade. The average pass rate is presented for each task. The means reported are raw scores for each task. The percentages exclude data that were discarded because of equipment failure, which occurred at a rate of 4.04%, or participant issues, which included withdrawal from the study or a participant declining to complete an activity.
Type of task | N | Reliability | 95% CI of Reliability | |
Number updating (accuracy) | 139 | 0.95 | [.93, .96] | |
Number Back Visual (accuracy) | 148 | 0.86 | [.81, .90] | |
Number Back Auditory (accuracy) | 151 | 0.82 | [.75, .87] | |
Location span (weighted sum) | 158 | 0.7 | [.59, .78] | |
Location span run (mean) | 146 | 0.93 | [.91, .95] | |
Visual span (weighted sum) | 140 | 0.73 | [.62, .81] | |
Visual span run (mean) | 99 | 0.84 | [.78, .89] | |
Digit span (weighted sum) | 159 | 0.67 | [.55, .76] | |
Digit span run (mean) | 109 | 0.85 | [.79, .89] | |
Non-Word Rep (weighted sum) | 153 | 0.6 | [.45, .71] | |
Cross-Modal bind (mean) | 153 | 0.38 | [.15, .55] | |
Phonological bind span (weighted sum) | 149 | 0.53 | [.35, .66] | |
Visual bind (weighted sum) | 145 | 0.51 | [.32, .65] |
Table 3: Reliability of CABC-WM Tasks. The reliabilities reported are derived from split-half and split-third coefficients, which are special cases of the more general K-split coefficient25,26,27. Most reliabilities were moderate to high in value.
The CABC-WM was developed to comprehensively assess working memory in children based on prominent theories of working memory. Multiple tasks assess central executive, phonological working memory, visuospatial working memory, and binding functions.
Presently, the CABC-WM is undergoing additional refinement and testing. On occasion, the research assistant may encounter technical problems with the CABC-WM interface due to programming glitches or computer errors. The research team provides all assistants with a troubleshooting manual to address known problems (e.g., the program may get stuck on a screen and need manual advancement), as well as extensive training regarding adherence to the troubleshooting protocol. Due to the duration of research sessions, child participants may become bored or frustrated with the program. Research assistants are trained to accommodate the child with breaks as necessary to maintain motivation and attention to the tasks. On rare occasions, the computer program has been known to require a reboot to continue. In those instances, if administration was interrupted mid-task, the task is not readministered, and that data is lost. The research team is diligently working to minimize these occurrences.
For now, the entire research battery should be administered, because children's performances on individual tasks presented outside the game environment have not been assessed. We are conducting studies to reduce the number of items in the battery, to assess the validity, and to determine how older elementary children perform on these measures. The research version of the CABC-WM requires five 30 to 45 min sessions to complete. This provides a comprehensive assessment of working memory for young elementary school children that may be of interest to researchers, but in its current form, the battery is not practical for practitioners. The validity of working memory models and task reliability have been reported for second graders in the U.S. The next steps are to test the battery in an expanded age range of children, to reduce the number of tasks in the battery, and to test concurrent validity.
There are only two known assessments specifically designed to measure working memory that are currently available for children11,12. The CABC-WM represents a more comprehensive alternative to these measures, administered in a child-friendly context (e.g., a computer game) to increase motivation. Results suggest that CABC-WM tasks are reliable when administered to second graders with typical development.
Findings from the initial sample of second-grade children are being used to refine the CABC-WM battery. The next steps are to assess the reliability and validity of the battery in a wider age range of children. The long-term goals of this research are to help educators and families understand the individual working memory strengths and weaknesses of children to support differentiated instruction and to help each child understand their working memory profile to empower their self-advocacy and use of strategies to increase academic achievement.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health NIDCD Grant #R01 DC010784. We are deeply grateful to the staff, research associates, school administrators, teachers, children, and families who participated. Key personnel included (in alphabetical order) Gary Carstensen, Cecilia Figueroa, Karen Guilmette, Trudy Kuo, Bjorg LeSueur, Annelise Pesch, and Jean Zimmer. Many students also contributed to this work, including (in alphabetical order) Genesis Arizmendi, Lauren Baron, Alexander Brown, Nora Schlesinger, Nisha Talanki, and Hui-Chun Yang.
21.5-inch touchscreen computer with standard keyboard and 10-key number pad and mouse | Toshiba | DZ125-S2101 | This desktop touchscreen PC is used to administer the Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM). |
Binaural headphones with microphone – child | Sennheiser | PC-150 | This mic/headphone combination set deliver audio content and record verbal responses from participants while completing the CABC-WM |
Headphones – adult | Sennheiser | HD 280 PRO | These headphones are worn by the assistant to monitor administration of the CABC-WM |
Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM) | in-house | Reference: Gray, S., Alt, M., Hogan, T.P., Green, S., & Cowan, N. (n.d.). Comprehensive assessment battery for children – Working memory. Unpublished measure under development. | This program has been designed using Adobe Flash by our research team. We are refining and developing the program as described in the manuscript for consumer use. It is not yet available to the public, although it is a primary goal to prepare the CABC-WM for practitioner use. |