This protocol describes harvesting, suturing, and monitoring fasciocutaneous flaps in rats that allow for good visualization and manipulation of blood flow through the superficial inferior epigastric vessels by means of clamping and ligating the femoral vessels. This is critical for studies involving ischemic preconditioning.
Fasciocutaneous flaps (FCF) have become the gold standard for complex defect reconstruction in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This muscle-sparing technique allows transferring vascularized tissues to cover any large defect. FCF can be used as pedicled flaps or as free flaps; however, in the literature, failure rates for pedicled FCF and free FCF are above 5%, leaving room for improvement for these techniques and further knowledge expansion in this area. Ischemic preconditioning (I.P.) has been widely studied, but the mechanisms and the optimization of the I.P. regimen are yet to be determined. This phenomenon is indeed poorly explored in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Here, a surgical model is presented to study the I.P. regimen in a rat axial fasciocutaneous flap model, describing how to safely and reliably assess the effects of I.P. on flap survival. This article describes the complete surgical procedure, including suggestions to improve the reliability of this model. The objective is to provide researchers with a reproducible and reliable model to test various ischemic preconditioning regimens and assess their effects on flap survivability.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery is constantly in evolution. The development of muscle, fasciocutaneous, and perforator flaps has made it possible to offer better-quality reconstructions while reducing morbidity. Combining this improved anatomical knowledge with enhanced technical skills, reconstructive surgeons can perform free flap transfers when defects are not close to any local solution. However, while perforator flap surgery is currently the most advanced technique in reconstructive surgery, the literature reports a 5% failure rate in free flap transfers1,2,3, and up to 20% for pedicled flap reconstruction4,5,6. Partial to total flap failure occurs when the flap's pedicle is compromised, therefore it is essential to continuously search for improvements to the current techniques. One of the methods to improve flap survival is to promote its neovascularization on the wound bed, thus allowing perfusion by a source other than the pedicle. Ischemic preconditioning (I.P.) has been initially described in a heart model7, demonstrating that an organ exposed to controlled ischemia survives to a higher degree after losing its primary blood supply by undergoing ischemia-induced neovascularization. Several authors have studied this cornerstone principle to optimize flap survival in preclinical and clinical models8,9,10.
The advantage of this technique over other methods to improve flap survival is its ease of implementation, consisting of clamp/declamp tests of the blood source. In the rat model, previous authors used the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap to study I.P. by clamping the main pedicle11,12,13. Nonetheless, several technical issues can be encountered with this model, and the literature lacks well-described protocols.
Therefore, this work aims to provide researchers with a detailed description of a rat SIEA flap procurement technique with an extended dissection of the femoral vessels to allow I.P. studies on an axial fasciocutaneous flap model. This model retains the integrity of the epigastric vessels and instead manipulates the femoral vessels, which are more resilient. We share our experience and tools to improve the study of this phenomenon and increase the replicability of this procedure.
The Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved the experimental protocol (IACUC- protocol #2022N000099).The authors followed the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guideline checklist for this work. All animals received humane care following the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. A total of 12 male Lewis rats (250-350 g, 8-10 weeks old) were used for all experiments.
1. Animal preparation
NOTE: Rats have a high metabolic rate and limited fat reserves; therefore, do not have them fast before surgery and never restrict water before the surgery.
2. Preoperative care
3. Intraoperative monitoring
4. Epigastric flap harvesting
Figure 1: Flap drawing on the animal's abdomen. The midline is used as a marker to locate the epigastric flap location. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Flap fully elevated. The fat pad is preserved at the proximal part of the flap to preserve the vascularization coming from the superficial inferior epigastric pedicle. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
5. Vessel preparation and ischemia induction
NOTE: The flap is entirely harvested at this stage, but the vessels are not yet prepared for ischemic preconditioning.
Figure 3: Microscopic view of the femoral vessels. The distal femoral vessels are tied. The nerve has been preserved. The dissection side is the right inguinal crease (R). Magnification: 40x. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Clamping of the proximal femoral vessels using two separate microsurgical clamps. This allows better clamping control, ensuring the absence of arterial and retrograde venous flow. (A) shows both the left (L) femoral vessels clamped. The superficial inferior epigastric vessels are visible (SIEA/SIEV). (B) shows a clamped femoral artery and a femoral vein before clamping, on the right inguinal crease of the animal (R). Magnification: 40x. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
6. Postoperative care
All flaps were viable on POD5, showing good vascularization by the SIEA alone. Figure 5 shows the flap before and after IV fluorescein injection, showing a complete vascularization.
Figure 5: Immediate intravenous fluorescein angiography (POD0). This assessment shows the flap's vascularization by the SIEA alone. The green fluorescence shows well perfused tissue including the whole flap paddle. Magnification: 40x. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
A pixel-analysis software (see Table of Materials) was used to bring an objective assessment of the flap survivability. The Fluorescein fluorescence is located in the green wavelength (a window of 115 to 255 nm was used). By selecting the flap circumference, the software provides a percentage of pixels included in the specific wavelength. This allows the precise measurement of flap survivability, since the pixels included in the necrotic areas are not within the fluorescence wavelength window.
The results of two control models are presented: a negative control group to confirm the viability of this axial fasciocutaneous flap model without I.P., and a positive control group to verify its non-survivability in case of ligation on POD 5 without prior I.P. with the current literature16. Figure 6 shows the experimental design for both of these control models.
Figure 6: Timeline of the control group models. All groups underwent flap elevation on POD0. The negative control group consisted of flap observation without surgical intervention on the flap's vessels. The positive control group consisted of ligation on POD5 without ischemic preconditioning. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
As seen in Figure 7, the negative control group presented the entire viability of the flap paddle. In this group, 99.50% ± 0.76% survival was experienced at POD10, where no ligation was performed on the feeding vessels. All the animals remained healthy during this observation period.
Figure 7: Angiography of the negative control at (A) POD5 and (B) POD10. This assessment shows full survival of the flap without intervention on its pedicle. The green fluorescence shows well-perfused tissue, including the whole flap paddle. Note: control biopsies were taken on this replicate. Magnification: 40x. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The positive control group underwent the same initial flap harvesting surgery. Subsequently, on POD5, the vessels were cauterized, directly cutting off blood flow to the flap. No I.P. was performed before the ligation. Throughout POD5-10, progressive flap necrosis was noticed as the flap turned dark in color and hardened. As seen in Figure 8A, the flap post ligation did not show any fluorescence after IV fluorescein injection apart from the tip, while the surrounding skin was perfused. By POD10, the flap was viable over 11.25% ± 1.58% of its surface for all the replicates (Figure 8B), showing poor autonomization from its main pedicle on POD5. Interestingly, the distal tip was the only part that was autonomized and survived at POD10.
Figure 8: Angiography of the positive control at (A) POD5 and (B) POD10 post ligation. The absence of the green fluorescence immediately after ligation (A) shows no perfusion of the flap, proving the absence of neovascularization. This is confirmed at POD10 (B), with necrosis of 85% of the skin paddle (black/purple). Interestingly, the distal tip is viable and neovascularized (green fluorescent part of the flap). Magnification: 40x. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
A group (n = 3) using short cycles of I.P. was also tested to demonstrate the value of this model. The animals underwent three cycles of 15 min of ischemia, followed by 15 min of reperfusion by clamping and unclamping the artery and vein of the proximal femoral vessels, accessed through the inguinal crease on POD0, 1, 2, and 3, before ligation on POD516.
Visually, the researchers confirmed the functionality of the clamping period by observing a pale/blue discoloration of the flap and darkening of the blood in the epigastric vessels during periods of ischemia. Additionally, the researchers injected fluorescein on POD5 after ligation and observed comparable flap survival with the positive control group (13.67% ± 5.03% of flap survival), showing that this I.P. protocol is inefficient in this model (Figure 9).
Figure 9: Statistical analysis of the flap surface viability on POD10. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare groups. Two-tailed p-values are shown over the U zigzag lines. The negative control group (n = 4) showed 99.5% survivability. The positive control group (n = 5) showed 11.25% survivability. The experimental group, as an example, showed 13.67% survivability, showing non-significant improvement compared with the positive control (p = 0.86). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This article describes a reproducible fasciocutaneous flap model harvested in rats, allowing I.P. evaluation. This step-by-step surgical protocol gives research groups a reliable model to test different I.P. regimens. By preventing any vascularization other than the pedicle, this model allows for studying the flap’s neovascularization from the wound bed and margin. This study performed the ligation on POD5, as previous studies have observed the autonomization of this flap in rats on POD5-711,13,16. This model aims to aid in ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) studies that optimize and shorten the interval necessary for full autonomization. Thus, to see the most significant results with ischemic preconditioning, our goal was to ligate the feeding vessels after autonomization but before full neovascularization of the flap (described to happen on POD716).
The model’s success lies in ensuring no damage to the femoral or SIE vessels occur during procurement of the skin flap, which would require the surgeon to maintain visualization of vessels during the entire flap procedure. Furthermore, the distal femoral vessels must be properly ligated to induce ischemia accurately through the proximal vessels with no backflow coming from other vessels. These steps are critical to observe experimental outcomes.
The benefit of this model is that it preserves the integrity of the epigastric vessels by manipulating the femoral vessels instead, after careful vessel preparation ensuring that the proximal femoral vessels are the only source of blood to the SIEA pedicle. The advantage is that the size of the clamped femoral vessels allows a good recovery of its lumen. In contrast, a venous microsurgical clamp can permanently harm the epigastric vessels, requiring termination of the experiment. Moreover, the femoral vessel dissection in the inguinal crease is more accessible than in the epigastric fat pad after the initial surgery because of the postoperative fibrosis. This model allows safer access for repetitive surgeries involving vessel clamping; Hsu et al.17 described a similar model for an IRI study, but did not describe the procedure.
Another innovation of this model is IV fluorescein injections to confirm flap vascularization and viability. Other authors described IV indocyanine green (ICG) injections in a rat flap model18,19, similar to its use in clinics20,21. However, the cost of ICG and the specific necessary hardware is a limitation and does not seem to be an efficient technique22. We described a simple technique that can be used in any laboratory with a simple wood lamp, allowing good visualization of the flap’s viability and vascularization.
One limitation of this model is the impossibility of properly assessing two flaps in the same animal. It is not possible to simultaneously assess both a treated flap and a biological control, due to the potential effects of remote I.P. provoked by clamping of the contralateral flap’s pedicle23.
The clinical applications of I.P. can improve fasciocutaneous flap survival by providing reliable protocols of on-table clamp/unclamp sequences by plastic surgeons. Some authors have described the use of IP to allow earlier pedicle division in forehead flaps and groin flaps24,25. However, I.P. protocols must be optimized to provide surgeons with a reliable tool to allow its use more commonly. Both local-made possible with the model we describe-and remote I.P. show promising results in improving fasciocutaneous flap survivability26. Finally, this model is suitable for studying ischemia-reperfusion injuries and the systemic response to such types of stress, which is an area of research interest23.
In conclusion, this accurate description of a reliable and reproducible model offers a valuable tool for I.P. and ischemia-reperfusion injury studies in a rat fasciocutaneous flap model, providing researchers with larger vessels to manipulate and access compared to previous models.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was funded by Massachusetts General Hospital (W.G.A) and Shriners Children's Boston (B.U, K.U, C.L.C). Y.B and I.F.v.R are funded by Shriners Hospitals for Children (Proposal ID: #970280 and #857829 respectively).
1 mL Syringe Luer-Lok Tip | BD | 309628 | |
3-0 Ethilon 18” Black Monofilament Nylon suture | Ethicon | ETH-663H | |
8-0 Ethilon 12” Black Monofilament Nylon suture | Ethicon | 1716G | |
Adson Atraumatic Forceps | Aesculap Surgical Instruments | BD51R | |
Akorn Fluorescein Injection USP 10% Single Dose Vial 5 mL | Akorn | 17478025310 | |
Betadine Solution 5% Povidone-Iodine Antiseptic Microbicide | PBS Animal Health | 11205 | |
Bipolar Cords | ASSI | ASSI.ATK26426 | |
Buprenorphine Hydrochloride Injection | PAR Pharmaceutical | 3003406C | This concentration needs to be diluted for rodents. |
Depilatory product – Nair Hair remover lotion | Nair | NC0132811 | |
Ear tag applier | World Precision Instruments | NC0038715 | |
Gauze Sponges | Curity | 6939 | |
Isoflurane Auto-Flow Anesthesia Machine | E-Z Systems | EZ-190F | |
Isoflurane, USP | Patterson Veterinary | 1403-704-06 | |
Jewelers Bipolar Forceps Non-Stick 11 cm, straight pointed tip, 0.25 mm tip diameter | ASSI | ASSI.BPNS11223 | |
Lone Star elastic stays | Cooper Surgical | 3311-1G | |
Lone star Self-retaining retractor | Cooper Surgical | 3304G | |
Metronidazole tablets USP | Teva | 500111-333-06 | |
Micro spring handle scissors | AROSurgical | 11.603.14 | |
Microscope (surgical) | Leica | M525 F40 | |
Microsurgical clamp applying forceps | Ambler Surgical | 31-906 | |
Microsurgical clamps (x2) | Millennium Surgical | 18-B1V | |
Microsurgical Dumont #4 forceps | Dumont Swiss made | 1708-4TM-PO | |
Microsurgical needle holder | ASSI | B-14-8 | |
Needle holder | World Precision Instruments | 501246 | |
Nosecone for Anesthesia | World Precision Instruments | EZ-112 | |
Pixel analysis software | GNU Image Manipulation Program v2.10 | GIMP | GNU Open licence |
PrecisionGlide Needle 27 G | BD | 305109 | |
Ragnell Scissors | Roboz Surgical | RS-6015 | |
Rimadyl (carprofen) | Zoetis | 10000319 | This concentration needs to be diluted for rodents |
Scientific Elizabethan collar (e-collar) for Rats | Braintree Scientific | NC9263311 | |
Small animal ear tag | National Band & Tag Company | Style 1005-1 | |
Small Animal Heated Operating Table (Adjustable) | Peco Services Ltd | 69023 | |
Sterile towel drape | Dynarex Corporation | 4410 | |
Sterile water for injection and irrigation | Hospira | 0409488724-1 | |
Surgical scrub – BD ChloraPrep Hi-Lite Orange 3 mL applicator with Sterile Solution | BD | 930415 | |
UV lamp | UVP | UVL-56 | |
Webcol Alcohol prep pads | Simply Medical | 5110 |