A method of intraductal injection of reagents for an ethanol-based ablative solution to the mouse mammary ductal tree for in vivo imaging and breast cancer prevention is described. Injection directly into the nipple opening allows for targeting mammary epithelial cells with minimal collateral tissue damage.
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the second-leading cause of cancer-related death for women in the USA. For high-risk women, prophylactic mastectomy is the most effective primary prevention strategy. Prophylactic mastectomy is an aggressive surgical procedure that completely removes the mammary epithelial cells from which breast cancer arises along with the surrounding tissue. We seek to develop a minimally invasive intraductal procedure as an alternative to prophylactic mastectomy to locally ablate the mammary epithelial cells before they can become malignant. We and others have developed an intraductal delivery procedure to reach and treat these epithelial cells in rodent models of breast cancer. While the mouse mammary gland with a single non-anastomosed ductal tree opening at the nipple has a much less complex and tortuous architecture than the human breast, chemically induced and genetically engineered mouse models of breast cancer are valuable to produce proof-of-concept studies of new preventative strategies. Here, we describe a procedure for intraductal delivery of an ethanol-based ablative solution containing micro-CT/X-ray tantalum-based contrast agent within the mouse mammary ductal tree for the therapeutic purpose of primary prevention of breast cancer. Intraductal delivery of aqueous reagents (e.g., cytotoxic compounds, siRNAs, AdCre) has been previously described in mouse models. Thus, we focus our protocol description on methodological modifications and unique experimental considerations for optimizing delivery of ethanol, for minimizing local and systemic side effects of ethanol administration, and for in vivo visualization of ductal tree filling via micro-CT/fluoroscopy imaging. Visualization of the ductal tree immediately after injection of a contrast-containing solution allows for confirmation of complete filling or unsuccessful outcomes such as underfilling or overfilling. This procedure can be applied for delivery and imaging of other ablative compounds aimed at either preventing tumor formation or locally treating early-stage tumors accessible via the ductal tree.
Breast cancer is a common and potentially lethal disease with few options available for prevention1. The most effective intervention is prophylactic mastectomy; however, only high-risk individuals opt to undergo this procedure as it is a surgery with major life-changing consequences2. The procedure completely removes the mammary epithelial cells from which breast cancer arises along with the surrounding tissue. This can result in physical, psychological, and social stress for the individual, and often dissuades individuals from proceeding with this surgical procedure as their first line of primary intervention.
We have demonstrated that delivery of an ablative solution containing 70% ethanol (EtOH) directly into the ductal tree is effective at killing mammary epithelial cells with limited collateral tissue damage and at preventing breast tumors in mouse models3. EtOH has been long used clinically as an ablative or sclerosing agent for local treatment. Percutaneous EtOH injection is used as an ablative agent for unresectable liver tumors, renal and adrenal neoplasms, and pancreatic cystic tumors4,5,6; for celiac plexus neurolysis to reduce pain7; and for treating breast pseudoaneurysms8. Intravascular EtOH injection is used as a sclerosing agent to eliminate swelling and deformation from arteriovenous malformations (AVM), and for cosmetic treatment of spider veins and varicose veins9,10,11,12,13. Like prophylactic mastectomy, the success of prevention with local delivery of an ablative solution hinges on the ability to completely remove all mammary epithelial cells from which cancer could potentially arise. This requires confirmation that the ablative substance has successfully filled the ductal tree, thus contacting all mammary epithelial cells directly. Clinical means for injecting substances within the mammary glands and visualizing them by image-guided fluoroscopy or ductography are readily available14,15; therefore, it will be possible to both deliver and confirm successful delivery when this procedure may warrant evaluation in clinical trials.
Demonstrating the feasibility of this image-guided approach in laboratory animals is a key step in establishing the efficacy and translational feasibility of intraductal (ID) ablation as a preventative measure for breast cancer. In our laboratory, we have developed a method to successfully inject all mammary glands in mice with an ablative solution containing a contrast agent over a course of weekly injections to ensure the animal does not succumb to an overdose of EtOH (Figure 1, Figure 2, reference nos.3,16). This procedure places a 34 G needle inside the nipple opening of an isoflurane-anesthetized mouse to inject the test solution. Some key improvements of the procedure include the use of gastight syringes for liquid and gases, injection of higher volumes per ductal trees17, and extended anti-inflammatory treatment. The preclinical treatment of 5 mg/kg of carprofen, an NSAID, from 2 d before to 7 d after the ID procedure is in line with that of clinical sclerosing therapy for AVM. Typically, after systemic anesthesia, the patients receive anti-inflammatory medications, such as NSAIDs, for 2 days post-procedure that can be extended to mitigate any local inflammation or pain12. Alcohol intoxication is significantly mitigated by intraperitoneal injection of a 5% sucrose solution in mice. With administration of this sucrose solution, mice can be safely injected with up to 160 μL of 70% EtOH (up to four ductal trees; about 0.4 g/dL of EtOH content in blood); animals fully recovered within 4 h after ID injections. For injection of more than four glands in mice and/or higher EtOH concentrations, we perform sequential sessions to allow enough recovery time. Alcohol intoxication in women would be a lesser concern due to the lower proportion of alcohol amount to body weight. Given the number of ductal trees in human breast14,15, about 16, and estimated volume to fill each tree duct18,19, up to 32 mL of 70% EtOH will be administered. This quantity will be much lower than the 50 mL of 95% EtOH administered in other clinical procedures4,9. Intravenous administration of thiamine and glucose solution could be used to further minimize effects of EtOH intoxication, especially in cases where a larger total volume of EtOH may need to be injected and/or for women who have a lower tolerance to alcohol consumption (e.g., allelic variants in alcohol or aldehyde dehydrogenases).
Imaging via micro-CT/fluoroscopy allows us to confirm successful ductal filling of each gland (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). This can be recorded for future analysis, or assessed in the moment via real-time fluoroscopy imaging, as would be done in clinical application, to limit overall radiation burden imposed on the animal. To further improve specific features of this ablative solution for real time image-guided delivery in vivo, we previously compared FDA-approved iodine-containing contrast to a tantalum oxide (TaOx)-containing nanoparticle synthesized by the Shapiro lab3,16. TaOx showed superior performance as a micro-CT contrast agent for visualizing the initial filling of the ductal tree (Figure 2, Figure 3). TaOx can be used as a reference contrast to perform a more systematic and longitudinal assessment of other nanoparticle-based blood pool contrast agents (e.g., iodine-, bismuth-, or gold-containing) and compatibility of TaOx with different concentrations of ethyl cellulose as gelling agent20,21.
All the experiments described here were conducted under protocols approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Michigan State University.
1. Extended anti-inflammatory treatment
2. Preoperative preparation
NOTE: This step will occur 2-3 days prior to the injection.
3. Intraductal injection
NOTE: This step will occur 2-3 days after preoperative preparation.
4. micro-CT imaging
5. Image analysis
Female mice have five pairs of mammary glands with a single ductal tree that opens at the nipple orifice22. At the tips of the developing ductal tree are the terminal end buds (TEBs), proliferative structures that direct growth and branching. After puberty when the elongation phase is completed, TEBs regress and become functionally and anatomically indistinguishable from terminal ducts or alveolar buds23. Terminal ductal lobular units serve a similar function in humans as TEBs do in mice and are the sites from which breast cancer predominantly arises24,25. We can inject up to 50 μL of 70% EtOH solution to fill the entire ductal tree of thoracic and abdominal mammary glands of 9-week-old FVB/N, NSG, and other mouse strains (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, see references3,16). In a typical experiment, we can inject up to eight mammary glands with an ablative solution of 70% EtOH and 100 mM TaOx in two consecutive ID procedures separated by 7 days to allow for animal recovery (Figure 2). Animals are imaged by micro-CT immediately after the last ID injection to assess successful delivery of the solution to the entire ductal tree (Figure 2). In our experience, the nipples of inguinal glands are suitable for injection in about 60% of the animals, and the nipples of cervical glands in about 40%. When suitable, we can inject up to 30 μL of 70% EtOH solution to fill the entire ductal tree of cervical and inguinal mammary glands (Figure 2). FVB and NSG strains generally present more suitable nipples for injection than C57BL/6J or mixed genetic background strains. Whole mount dual staining protocol or 3D confocal microscopy are good orthogonal methods to confirm to what extent the ductal tree was filled (Figure 3). These tissue-correlate analyses are compatible with and can be performed after in vivo imaging. The obvious limitation of these orthogonal methods is that they require animal termination for tissue collection and analysis; however, in an optimization phase of a new ablative formulation, they provide independent validation.
Figure 1: Workflow of intraductal procedure and image analysis. Key steps of the ID procedure are highlighted. Please see the video for more details. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Successful cannulation and delivery of ablative solution to multiple mammary glands. (A) Representative nipple variegation in FVB and NSG mouse strains. Long nipples are easier to cannulate than short nipples, whereas too short or vestigial nipples cannot be cannulated. Once cannulated, the size of the nipple does not affect successful intraductal delivery. (B) Gross anatomical analysis of blue dye in an ablative solution provides ex vivo evidence of ductal tree filling and delivery success. (C,D) Real-time fluoroscopy and post-image acquisition 3D micro-CT rendition provide in vivo evidence of delivery success. (D) Successful injection of both abdominal and inguinal glands, and three out of four thoracic glands (fat pad injection in gland #2). Scale bars correspond to 1 mm in images at different magnification. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: In vivo and ex vivo demonstration of ductal tree filling. 70% EtOH/100 mM TaOx nanoparticles/Evans Blue solution was intraductally injected into the mouse abdominal mammary gland and immediately imaged by micro-CT and processed for dual whole mount staining. Ductal tree was reconstructed using an image analysis software package. The solution entirely fills the carmine alum-stained ductal tree. A separate gland was immunostained for E-Cadherin (Cdh1), cleared using Benzyl Alcohol:Benzyl Benzoate and imaged by confocal microscopy as described26. The ductal tree was reconstructed using image analysis software. Pseudo-coloring rendering of confocal image (i.e., black background to white, green marker signal to magenta) was obtained with the image invert function of the image editing software. Scale bars correspond to 1 mm in images at different magnification. This figure has been modified from reference no.3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Issue | Appearance | Solution | |||
Short nipple (Fig. 2) | Nipple has low profile – hard to grab | It is sometimes easier to hold the skin near the nipple and target the center of the nipple with the needle. The needle will likely dive under the skin. Pulling up slowly may reveal the nipple to be slightly over the tip of the needle and give room to grab and pull it the rest of the way onto the needle. Be very careful when diving below the skin about the angle of the needle. It is easy to inadvertently get a fat pad injection by stabbing at the wrong angle. | |||
Fat nipple | Much larger than other nipples with little peelable dead skin – easily visible without scope | Very easy to get a fat pad injection on these nipples. Be very cautious about angle of the needle when inserting into nipple. | |||
Fat pad injection (Fig. 2) | Swollen around nipple and possibly in nipple itself – easiest to see if color is added to injection solution | If nipple is swelling with first few ul injected, remove needle, and attempt to insert again with more care taken of angle. Begin injection again and watch for further swelling. If swelling continues, abandon attempt. It is very rare to successfully inject a nipple that has started out as a fat pad injection. | |||
Wounds/scabbing | Open wound or scabbing near injection site of EtOH solution | Apply triple antibiotic ointment to open wounds but leave scabbed wounds alone. Applying ointment to scabs can increase likelihood animal will bother the scab and remove it. Check every 1-2 days until healed depending on severity of wound. Carprofen should be given until healed even if beyond normal window. |
Table 1: Troubleshooting and helpful tips.
Prophylactic mastectomy is currently the most effective intervention for breast cancer, yet it has some serious negative impacts. Local ablation of mammary epithelial cells with an EtOH-based solution is a promising alternative therapy as we demonstrated in a proof-of-concept study on the aggressive FVB-Tg-C3(1)-TAg mouse model of breast cancer3. ID injection of this ablative solution allows for targeting of the mammary epithelial cells from which breast cancer arises with limited collateral damage. Addition of an X-ray contrast agent to the ablative solution allows for enhanced understanding of the effectiveness of the solution at prevention, as we can see whether each ductal tree is successfully filled following injection (Figure 2B). Viewing injected glands by fluoroscopy immediately post-injection mirrors what will likely be done in the clinic to confirm successful filling of the ductal tree. Visual confirmation of solution delivery will best inform whether all parts of the tree have been reached in real time. This could allow for further injection to be performed to complete filling at the time or in a future session. It is of great importance that ablative solution reaches all parts of the ductal tree to ensure that all epithelial cells may be accessed for killing (Figure 3). Leaving behind living epithelial cells within the tree would allow for the possibility that breast cancer could still arise. Utilizing contrast in ID injections to image success of the injection could also be useful for other formulations. Table 1 provides troubleshooting and helpful tips. Other studies have described ID delivery protocols for viral particles (e.g., AdCre, CRISPR guide RNAs), hormones, cytotoxic compounds, siRNAs and/or targeting agents in mice3,16,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, rats24,32,39,40,41, and rabbits42,43,44,45,46,47. Independent clinical studies reported successful cannulation of up to eight ducts per breast for local delivery of chemotherapy40,48,49. Visualizing full filling when delivering other solutions aimed at prevention or geared toward treatment would be worthwhile for similar reasons. The knowledge that the solution has reached all branches and terminal ends of the tree will be informative in assessing successful prevention or treatment.
We are not aware of any other intraductal imaging methods in mice33,34 or other animal models47 that afford the high resolution of TaOx nanoparticles. Of note, TaOx in the murine ductal tree outperforms FDA-approved contrast agents for diagnostic ductography3,16. As we continue to assess the ID ablative procedure for its ability to prevent breast cancer, we will be able to determine more precisely from which glands cancer arises with the help of added data given through imaging after ID delivery. For instance, one could determine whether a gland that was only partially filled is more likely than a non-injected gland to result in tumor formation, which addresses the safety profile and concern of unsuccessful injections on a high-risk woman. This technique has some limitations. This is a relatively challenging mouse technique that requires dexterity and proficiency of the operator to manipulate and successfully cannulate each duct. Each individual injection is an independent event thus unsuccessful injection on one or more glands may compromise result interpretation. Given the size of the murine mammary gland and fragility of the nipple, fluoroscopy or similar image-guidance technique is not available to inform in real-time when to stop infusion. This real time image-guidance will be a requirement for clinical implementation of local delivery of an ablative solution.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported, in part, by the National Cancer Institute R21 CA226579 and R01 CA258314 grants to LFS and by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering R01 EB029418 grant to EMS. We would like to thank the MSU Institute for Quantitative (IQ) Health Science and Engineering Imaging Core facility for use of their imaging systems and technical expertise. We would like to thank Dr. Danielle Ferguson for reviewing contents of the video and the figures for adherence to animal welfare guidelines.
AnalyzeDirect v12.0 | Caliper | n/a | For micro-CT image processing |
Carprieve, Carprofen 50 mg/mL | Allivet | 50647 | For anti-inflammatory treatment |
Evans blue | Sigma | E2129-50G | For injection visualization |
Hot water bath | Toolots | Yidu_HH-S2 | For preparing carprofen cups |
Imaris | Bitplane | n/a | For confocal image processing |
MediGel Sucralose Cups | ClearH2O | 74-02-5022 | For delivery of carprofen |
Model 1705 RN Syringe, 50μL | Hamilton | 7655-01 | For intraductal injection |
Photoshop 2021 | Adobe | n/a | For image processing |
Quantum GX2 microCT Imaging System | Perkin Elmer | CLS149276 | For micro-CT image acquisition |
Small Hub RN Needle, 34 gauge, custom (12° bevel angle, 0.375 in, point style 4) | Hamilton | 207434 | For intraductal injection |
Stereo Microscope SZM Series | AmScope | SM-4TPZ-144 | For intraductal injection |
Sterile blue food dye | McCormick | 930641 | For injection visualization |
Sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) | ThermoFisher | 14190250 | For solution preparation |
Stickers | DOT Scientific | DOTSCI-C50 | For preparing carprofen cups |
Sucrose | Calbiochem | 8550-5KG | For intraductal injection |
Syringes | Fisher | 14-826-79 | For preparing carprofen cups |
Vortex | VWR | 10153-834 | For preparing carprofen cups |
Warming pump/pad(s) | Braintree Scientific | HTP-1500 120V; AP-R 26E | For intraductal injection/preoperative preparation |