The robotic technique shown herein aims at faithfully reproducing the open procedure for radical treatment of cancer of the body-tail of the pancreas. The protocol also demonstrates the ability to master involvement of major peripancreatic vessels without conversion to open surgery.
This article shows the technique of robot-assisted radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy, including resection and reconstruction of the spleno-mesenteric junction, for cancer of the body-tail of the pancreas. The patient is placed supine with the legs parted and a pneumoperitoneum is established and maintained at 10 mmHg. To use the surgical system, four 8 mm ports and one 12 mm port are required. The optic port is placed at the umbilicus. The other ports are placed, on either side, along the pararectal line and the anterior axillary line at the level of the umbilical line. The assistant port (12 mm) is placed along the right pararectal line. Dissection begins by detaching the gastrocolic ligament, thus opening the lesser sac, and by a wide mobilization of the splenic flexure of the colon. The superior mesenteric vein is identified along the inferior border of the pancreas. Lymph node number 8a is removed to permit clear visualization of the common hepatic artery. A tunnel is then created behind the neck of the pancreas. To permit safe resection and reconstruction of the spleno-mesenteric junction, further preemptive dissection is required before dividing the pancreatic neck to bring in clear view all relevant vascular pedicles. Next, the splenic artery is ligated and divided, and the pancreatic neck is divided, with selective ligature of the pancreatic duct. After vein resection and reconstruction, dissection proceeds to complete the clearance of peripancreatic arteries that are peeled off from all lympho-neural tissues. Both celiac ganglia are removed en-bloc with the specimen. The Gerota fascia covering the upper pole of the left kidney is also removed en-bloc with the specimen. Division of short gastric vessels and splenectomy complete the procedure. A drain is left near the pancreatic stump. The round ligament of the liver is mobilized to protect the vessels.
The incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer are increasing, and the disease will soon become the second leading cause of cancer related death in Western countries1. The high fatality rate of pancreatic cancer is mostly related to the biological aggressiveness of this tumor type, with early and rapid metastatic dissemination2. For this reason, only approximately 20% of the patients are diagnosed with a seemingly localized disease. In these patients, radical tumor resection, in association with either neoadjuvant3,4 or adjuvant chemotherapy5, provides the only hope for a cure.
The diagnosis of pancreatic cancer located in the body-tail of the pancreas is often made when the tumor has already grown extensively or metastases are evident6,7. The few patients with a seemingly localized disease are those who could benefit from surgery, especially if negative resection margins are achieved8 and an adequate number of lymph nodes is retrieved9. Patients meeting these criteria could actually attain long-term survival, as left-sided pancreatic cancers are associated with a less aggressive malignant phenotype when compared with pancreatic head cancers10.
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS), first described by Strasberg et al.11, is a procedure that was specifically conceived to provide radical resection of pancreatic cancers located in the body-tail. Although laparoscopic RAMPS was shown to be feasible in well-selected patients12, the complexity of this procedure and the high rate of margin negative resection reported after robotic procedures13 suggest that robotic assistance could be rewarding in this operation. We herein describe the technique for robotic assisted RAMPS, that was developed in a center with experience in thousands of robotic procedures and in over 350 robotic pancreatic resections.
The procedure described herein was conducted in compliance with the guidelines set out by the Ethics Committee of Pisa University Hospital for robotic operations, including regulations on research activity.
NOTE: The patient is a 70-year-old female with a 3 cm pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma located in the body of the pancreas close to the neck of the gland. The patient presented with abdominal pain. Her past medical history demonstrated arterial hypertension and appendectomy. Total-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a hypoenhancing pancreatic tumor strictly adherent to the spleno-mesenteric junction, with associated upstream dilation of the main pancreatic duct (Figure 1). No distant metastasis was identified making the tumor potentially resectable with curative intent.
1. Experimental pre-operation
2. Surgical preparation
3. Preparatory surgical maneuvers and docking of the robotic system
4. Pancreatectomy
5. Vein resection and reconstruction
6. Completion of dissection
7. Protection of retroperitoneal vessels
8. Specimen extraction and wound closure
The operation time was 6 h and 15 min with an estimated blood loss of 150 mL. The time required to complete the vascular suture of the patch applied to the sidewall defect of the portomesenteric junction was 11 min. The postoperative course was uneventful. Pathology demonstrated a moderately differentiated ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (G2/3), with perineural invasion and involvement of the spleno-mesenteric junction. All the 56 resected lymph nodes were negative. Circumferential tumor margins, assessed at 1 mm, were also negative making the resection radical. The final pathology stage of this tumor was T3 N0 R0. At the longest follow-up of 30 months, the patient is alive, well, and disease-free.
At our institution, a robot-assisted radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy was performed in 20 patients. Admittedly, during the same period of time, other patients suitable for a minimally invasive approach received the same procedure using a laparoscopic technique without robotic assistance. This was not due to patient selection or surgeon preference but to the fact that the robot was not always timely available at the time of planned surgery, because of competition with either other procedures performed by our group (e.g., pancreatoduodenectomy) or procedures performed by other groups (e.g., urologic procedures).
Briefly, all procedures were completed under robotic assistance, without conversions to open surgery, despite three patients required associated vascular procedures (Table 1). Namely, two patients required resection and reconstruction of the spleno-mesenteric junction, and one patient required resection of the celiac trunk (modified Appleby procedure). The mean operative time was 325 min ± 88.6 min. Post-operative complications developed in 12 patients (60%), being severe according to the Clavien-Dindo classification25 in 3 patients (3a = 2; 3b = 1) (15%). There were no 90-day or in-hospital deaths. Grade B post-operative pancreatic fistula26 developed in 5 patients (35%). There was no grade C post-operative pancreatic fistula. Pathology demonstrated ductal adenocarcinoma in 14 patients, malignant intraductal papillary mucinous tumor in 5 patients, and pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer in one patient. In a patient population with a mean tumor diameter of 34 mm ± 13 mm, circumferential tumor margins, assessed at 1 mm, were negative in 17 patients (85%). The mean number of examined lymph nodes was 39 ± 16.6.
Figure 1: Preoperative computed tomography scan. (A) Basal; (B) Arterial phase; (C) Venous phase; (D) Parenchymal phase. A hypoenhancing pancreatic tumor, with upstream dilation of the pancreatic duct, is noted in the proximal part of the body of the pancreas. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Operating room setup. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Operation setting. (A) The patient is placed supine with the legs parted. (B) Intermittent pneumatic compression cuffs are placed around the legs. (C) The patient is secured to the operating table using wide bandings. (D) The abdomen is prepped widely. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Port placement and extraction site. (A) Abdominal landmarks. 1: right anterior axillary line; 2: right pararectal line; 3: midline; 4 left pararectal line; 5: left anterior axillary line; 6: transverse umbilical line; 7: suprabubic extraction site. (B) Pneumoperitoneum induction using a Veress needle technique. (C) Optic port placed immediately below the umbilicus. (D) Ports. I: robotic port for arm 1; II: assistant port; III: robotic port for arm 2 (optic); IV: robotic port for arm 3; V: robotic port for arm 4. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Operating table orientation. As highlighted in the square in the lower left corner, the operating table is oriented 15−20° in reverse Trendelenburg and tilted 5−8° to the patient's right side. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Docking of the surgical system for distal pancreatectomy. (A) Alignment of the laser crosshair of the boom over the initial camera port. (B) Direction of the camera arm (number 2) between L and E on the FLEX icon located at the base of the robotic arm. (C) Docking of the robotic arm 2 and insertion of the robotic camera. (D) After completion of targeting, the remaining arms are docked. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Mean or number | Standard deviation or percentage | |
Operative time (min) | 325 | ± 88.6 |
Associated vascular procedures | 3 | 15% |
Vein resection and reconstruction | 2 | 10% |
Arterial resection (modified Appleby procedure) | 1 | 5% |
Post-operative complications25 | 12 | 60% |
Severe post-operative complications (≥grade 3) | 3 | 15% |
Clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula26 | 5 | 25% |
Grade B post-operative pancreatic fistula | 5 | 25% |
Grade C post-operative pancreatic fistula | 0 | – |
90-day or in-hospital mortality | 0 | – |
Tumor type | ||
Ductal adenocarcinoma | 14 | 70% |
Malignant mucinous intraductal papillary tumor | 5 | 25% |
Neurondocrine carcinoma | 1 | 5% |
Tumor diameter (mm) | 34 | ± 13 |
Tumor margins (assessed at 1 mm) | ||
Negative (R0) | 17 | 85% |
Examined lymph nodes | 39 | ± 16.6 |
Table 1: Results of 20 consecutive robot-assisted radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomies.
Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplectomy aims at increasing the rate of radical resection for tumors located in the body and tail of the pancreas, as well as to achieve radical lymphoneurectomy. Depending on the degree of tumor growth in the retroperitoneum, the left adrenal gland can be either spared (anterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplectomy) or removed en-bloc with the specimen (posterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplectomy). In all procedures the Gerota fascia covering the upper pole of the left kidney must be removed as well as all the lympho-neural tissues surrounding the common hepatic artery, the celiac trunk, and the left aspect of the superior mesenteric artery11,27.
Overall radical antegrade modular pancreatosplectomy is a complex procedure even when using an open approach. Although radical antegrade modular pancreatosplectomy has also been performed using pure laparoscopic techniques12,28, the use of a robotic system is thought to facilitate the procedure due to the enhanced dexterity offered by robotic assistance29. Indeed, Duouadi et al. found that robotic assistance reduced the rate of conversion to open surgery while increasing the number of resected lymph nodes and the rate of margin negative resections13.
When the tumor is located close to the neck of the pancreas, involvement of the superior mesenteric-portal vein and/or the celiac trunk may occur, further complicating the procedure. Both arterial and venous resections have been performed using robotic assistance during radical antegrade modular pancreatosplectomy30, but the safety and oncologic efficacy of these procedures remain to be established.
In the case presented here, we performed a sidewall resection of the portomesenteric axis. The defect was closed using a vein patch. We still consider overt vascular involvement a contraindication to robotic approach18,31. However, we have performed a few robotic pancreatic resections with associated vascular procedures when vascular involvement was limited, and operative conditions permitted the procedure to be safely completed under robotic assistance32. We have already performed over 500 of such procedures open and we have experience with both pancreatic33 and renal34 robotic transplants.
Not all pancreatic tumors located in the body-tail of the pancreas can be resected using minimally invasive techniques, including robotic-assistance. Although the contraindications to robotic resection are expected to vary with center and surgeon experience, it could be reasonable to accept that patients with truly locally advanced cancers, with portal hypertension secondary to superior mesenteric portal vein stenosis/obstruction, with severe central obesity, and/or requiring multivisceral resections are less likely to be safely resected robotically than open.
Although current guidelines recommend upfront resection for pancreatic cancers not meeting the criteria to be classified either “borderline resectable” or “locally advanced”35, neoadjuvant treatments may also be beneficial in patients with immediately resectable tumors36,37. No evidence is currently available on the impact of the new neoadjuvant treatments on both the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive pancreatic resections. This issue is probably worth to be explored.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors have no acknowledgements.
0 ethylene terephthalate sutures, straight needle | Ethicon | PE6624 | Polyethylene terephthalate is a braided non absorbable suture. 0 refers to suture size. |
0 linen ligatures | LORCA MARIN | 63055 | Linen is a sterile, non-absorbable, spun surgical suture material made of flax fibers of linen. Linen gives excellent knot security. 0 refers to suture size. |
0 Polysorb sutures | Ethicon | CL-5-M | Polysorb is a braided absorbable suture armed with a single needle. 0 refers to suture size. |
12mm port | Kii | CTB73 | Conventional laparoscopic port, used by the laparoscopic surgeon. The 12 mm size is required to accept a laparoscopic stapler, if required. |
2/0 linen ligatures | LORCA MARIN | 63254 | Linen is a sterile, non-absorbable, spun surgical suture material made of flax fibers of linen. Linen gives excellent knot security. 2/0 refers to suture size. |
2/0 Polysorb sutures | Ethicon | GL-323 | Polysorb is a braided absorbable suture armed with a single needle. 2/0 refers to suture size. |
3/0 linen ligatures | LORCA MARIN | 63515 | Linen is a sterile, non-absorbable, spun surgical suture material made of flax fibers of linen. Linen gives excellent knot security. 3/0 refers to suture size. |
3/0 linen sutures | LORCA MARIN | 63146 | Linen is a sterile, non-absorbable, spun surgical suture material made of flax fibers of linen. Linen gives excellent knot security. Linen sutures are armed with a single needle. 3/0 refers to suture size. |
3/0 Polysorb sutures | Ethicon | GL-322 | Polysorb is a braided absorbable suture armed with a single needle. 3/0 refers to suture size. |
4 robotic 8mm ports | Intuitive Surgical | 470359 | Robotic ports are the specific type of cannulas that are docked to the robotic system and are used to introduce robotic instruments in the human body. |
4/0 e-PTFE sutures | GORE | 4N04 | Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) is non absorbable, microporous, monofilament material typically used for vascular sutures. Other properties of e-PTFE inculde low-friction and comprexibility. 4/0 refers to suture size. |
4/0 SH polypropylene sutures | Ethicon | 8521 | Nonabsorbable, monofilament (polypropylene), suture typically used for vascular sutures and/or to fix bleeding sites. 4/0 refers to suture size. SH refers to the range fo curvature of the needle (26 mm) |
4/0 SH1 polypropylene sutures | Ethicon | EH7585 | Nonabsorbable, monofilament (polypropylene), suture typically used for vascular sutures and/or to fix bleeding sites. 4/0 refers to suture size. SH1 refers to the range fo curvature of the needle 22 mm) |
5/0 C1 polypropylene sutures | Ethicon | 8720 | Nonabsorbable, monofilament (polypropylene), suture typically used for vascular sutures and/or to fix bleeding sites. 5/0 refers to suture size. C1 refers to the range fo curvature of the needle (12 mm) |
5/0 e-PTFE sutures | GORE | 5N04 | Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) is non absorbable, microporous, monofilament material typically used for vascular sutures. Other properties of e-PTFE inculde low-friction and comprexibility. 5/0 refers to suture size. |
5/0 SH1 polypropylene sutures | Ethicon | PEE5692 | Nonabsorbable, monofilament (polypropylene), suture typically used for vascular sutures and/or to fix bleeding sites. 5/0 refers to suture size. SH1refers to the range fo curvature of the needle (22 mm) |
6/0 e-PTFE sutures | GORE | 6M12 | Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) is non absorbable, microporous, monofilament material typically used for vascular sutures. Other properties of e-PTFE inculde low-friction and comprexibility. 6/0 refers to suture size. |
6/0 polypropylene sutures | Ethicon | 8706 | Nonabsorbable, monofilament (polypropylene), suture typically used for vascular sutures and/or to fix bleeding sites. 6/0 refers to suture size. 6/0 polypropylene comes with just one needle size. |
Belt for legs | Eswell | 249100 | This device is used to prevent pressure injuries during surgical procudures. |
Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement | GORE SEAMGUARD | 12BSGTRI45P | The reinforcement consists ofa synthetic buttressing material meant to distribute the jaw closure stress on a larger surface. |
Black diamond micro forceps | Intuitive Surgical | 470033 | Small needle driver suitable for fine sutures. |
Bracci ureteral catheter 8Fr | Coloplast | AC4108 | A Bracci catheter is a straight rubber hose with 6 side holes located close to an open distal tip. It has also with a radiopaque line. Bracci catheters have been designed for use in urology but can be used also to flush vessels during laparoscopic procedures. 8 Fr refers to the size of the catheter in French. |
Cadiere forceps | Intuitive Surgical | 470049 | |
da Vinci Xi Surgical System | Intuitive Surgical | The da Vinci Surgical System is a telemanipulator that increases surgical dexterity during minimally invasive procedures. The system consists of three components: a patient side cart, a console, and a vision cart. | |
Endo GIA articulating reload with tri-staple technology 60mm | Covidien | EGIA60AMT | Cartridge for stapler reload |
Endocatch II 15mm | Covidien | 173049 | Bag for specimen extraction. |
Endoscope with 8mm camera 30° | Intuitive Surgical | 470027 | The robotic endoscope is a vision system providing HD and steroscopic vision to the surgeon working form the console. |
Harmonic shears | Intuitive Surgical | 480275 | |
Hug-u-vac | Allen Medical | A-60001 | This device is used to safely anchor the patient to the operating bed |
Ioban | 3M | 6650EZ | 3M is an incise drap that adheres securely to the skin thus reducing the risk of drape lift. It also provides wound protection, when placed to cover the entire lenght of the surgical incision. |
Kendall SCD sequential compression comfort sleeves | Cardinal Health | 74012 | This device provides sequential, gradient, circumferential compression (to the leg, foot or both simultaneously) to help prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. |
Laparoscopic stapler (Signia power handle) | Covidien | SIGSBCHGR | Signia is a laparoscopic, robotized stapler suturing and dividing tissues between three rows of titanium staples applied on each suture side. |
Large needle driver (n=2) | Intuitive Surgical | 470006 | |
Maryland bipolar forceps | Intuitive Surgical | 470172 | |
Medium hem-o-lok clip applier | Intuitive Surgical | 470327 | |
Monopolar curved scissors | Intuitive Surgical | 400180 | |
Pig-tail drain 14Fr | Cook | ULT14.0-38-25-P-6S-CLM-RH | A pig drain catheter is a rubber hose used to drain fluids from deep spaces in the human body. As compared with other catheters, the pigtail ends with a curl, similar to the tail of a pig, that is thought to facilitare the anchoring of the catheter. 14 Fr refers to the size of the catheter in French. |
Potts scissors | Intuitive Surgical | 470001 | Non-electrified scissors used mainly to incise, or unroof, vessels. |
Set of laparoscopic bulldogs clamps | Aesculap | This set consists of several bulldog clamps (of different shape and size) with dedicated laparoscopic instruments to be used to apply and remove the clamps | |
Signia power shell for signia power handle | Covidien | SIGPSSHELL | Sterile cover for Signia power handle |
Small hem-o-lok clip applier | Intuitive Surgical | 470401 | |
Veress needle | Aesculap | EJ995 | A Verres needle is a particular type of needle that is used to puncture the abdominal wall in order to create a pneumoperitoneum. It consists of an outer cannula, with a sharp tip, and an inner stylet, with a dull tip. The inner stylet is spring-loaded in order to protect viscera at the time of needle insertion, that occurs blindly. |
Vessel loops | Omnia Drains | NVMR61 | Disposable silicon rubber stripes, typically used to tag relevant anatomical structures |