We demonstrate the synthesis of fusogenic porous silicon nanoparticles for effective in vitro and in vivo oligonucleotide delivery. Porous silicon nanoparticles are loaded with siRNA to form the core, which is coated by fusogenic lipids through extrusion to form the shell. Targeting moiety functionalization and particle characterization are included.
With the advent of gene therapy, the development of an effective in vivo nucleotide-payload delivery system has become of parallel import. Fusogenic porous silicon nanoparticles (F-pSiNPs) have recently demonstrated high in vivo gene silencing efficacy due to its high oligonucleotide loading capacity and unique cellular uptake pathway that avoids endocytosis. The synthesis of F-pSiNPs is a multi-step process that includes: (1) loading and sealing of oligonucleotide payloads in the silicon pores; (2) simultaneous coating and sizing of fusogenic lipids around the porous silicon cores; and (3) conjugation of targeting peptides and washing to remove excess oligonucleotide, silicon debris, and peptide. The particle’s size uniformity is characterized by dynamic light scattering, and its core-shell structure may be verified by transmission electron microscopy. The fusogenic uptake is validated by loading a lipophilic dye, 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI), into the fusogenic lipid bilayer and treating it to cells in vitro to observe for plasma membrane staining versus endocytic localizations. The targeting and in vivo gene silencing efficacies were previously quantified in a mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia, in which the targeting peptide is expected to help the F-pSiNPs to home to the site of infection. Beyond its application in S. aureus infection, the F-pSiNP system may be used to deliver any oligonucleotide for gene therapy of a wide range of diseases, including viral infections, cancer, and autoimmune diseases.
Gene therapy modulates specific gene expression to obtain a therapeutic outcome. Numerous tools for gene modulation have been discovered and studied, including ribonucleic acid interference (RNAi) using oligonucleotides (e.g., short interfering RNA (siRNA)1,2, microRNA (miRNA)3,4), DNA plasmids5,6, nucleases (e.g., zinc finger, TALENS)7,8, and CRISPR/Cas9 systems9,10. While each tool’s mechanism of action differs, all of the tools must reach the cell’s cytoplasm or the nucleus to be active. As such, while these tools have proven to induce significant effect in modulating gene expression in vitro, the in vivo efficacy suffers from extracellular and intracellular obstacles. Due to the fact that the tools are of biological origin, many enzymes and clearance systems exist in our body that have the ability to degrade or remove the foreign molecules11. Even in the case that the tools reach the target cell, they suffer from endocytosis; a mode of cellular uptake that encapsulates and traps the tools in acidic stomach-like vesicles that degrade or expel the tools out of the cell. In fact, studies have shown that lipid nanoparticles are endocytosed via macropinocytosis, from which approximately 70% of the siRNA are exocytosed from the cells within 24h of uptake12,13. The majority of the remaining siRNA are degraded through the lysosomal pathway, and ultimately only 1-2% of the siRNA that initially enters the cell with the nanoparticles achieve endosomal escape to potentially undergo RNAi13,14.
We have recently developed fusogenic porous silicon nanoparticles (F-pSiNPs) that have an siRNA-loaded core composed of porous silicon nanoparticles, and a fusogenic lipid shell15. The F-pSiNPs present three major advantages over other conventional oligonucleotide delivery systems: (1) a fusogenic lipid coating which enables the particles to bypass endocytosis and deliver the entire payload directly in the cell cytoplasm (versus the 1-2% achieved by endocytosed particles13,14) (Figure 1); (2) high mass loading of siRNA in the pSiNPs (>20 wt% compared to 1-15 wt% by conventional systems)15, which rapidly degrade in the cytoplasm (once the core particles shed the lipid coating via fusogenic uptake) to release the siRNA; and (3) targeting peptide conjugation for selective homing to desired cell types in vivo.
The F-pSiNP system has demonstrated significant gene silencing efficacy (>95% in vitro; >80% in vivo) and subsequent therapeutic effect in a fatal mouse model of S. aureus pneumonia; the results of which were published previously15. However, the complex structure of the F-pSiNP system requires delicate handling and fine-tuned optimization to generate uniform and stable nanoparticles. Thus, the purpose of this work is to present a thorough protocol, as well as optimization strategies for the synthesis, functionalization, and characterization of F-pSiNPs to be used in targeted delivery of siRNAs for potent gene silencing effect.
1. Synthesis of porous silicon nanoparticles (pSINPs)
CAUTION: Always use caution when working with hydrofluoric acid (HF). Follow all safety guides according to its safety data sheet (SDS), handle any HF-containing chemicals in a fume hood, and wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE; double gloves with butyl gloves on the outside, butyl apron with lab coat underneath, face shield with safety goggles underneath). All universities and R&D labs require specific training on HF safety prior to usage. Do not attempt to work with HF without pre-approval of your local lab safety coordinator, as additional safety measures not described here are required.
2. Preparation of fusogenic lipid film
3. Loading and sealing of siRNA in pSiNPs
4. Coating siRNA-loaded pSiNPs with fusogenic lipids
5. Conjugation of targeting peptides
A successful synthesis of fusogenic pSiNPs should produce a homogenous, slightly opaque solution (Figure 3a). Failure to optimize the ratio and concentration of pSiNPs : siRNA : CaCl2 may lead to aggregation upon loading (Figure 3b). As the particles are extruded through 200 nm membranes, the average hydrodynamic diameter of the fusogenic pSiNPs measured by DLS should be approximately 200 nm, and the average zeta-potential approximately +7 mV as shown in Figure 4. After surface modification with targeting peptides, the overall diameter should be increased to be under 230 nm, and the average zeta-potential decreased down to -3.4 mV15. Any extensive deviation from the extrusion size is indicative of failed extrusion (dparticle >> dextrusion), or failed loading (dparticle << dextrusion). Aggregations may also be quantified using DLS. Moreover, the frozen aliquots must be thawed only once, as repeated freeze-thaw cycles disrupt the lipid membrane and intraparticular fusion and aggregation (Figure 4). As Figure 4a shows, fusogenic pSiNPs may be stored for 30 days and thawed without causing structural changes. However, repeated freeze-thaw cycles of a single aliquot cause severe aggregation (d >> 1,000 nm) and within 4 days of the daily cycle (Figure 4b), thus it is advised that the particles be aliquoted to single-use volumes.
Fusion may be confirmed by labelling the fusogenic lipids with the lipophilic DiI (Step 2.2.2), and observing the in vitro localization using confocal microscopy. Figure 1d shows successful fusion, where the fusogenic pSiNP’s lipids transfer the DiI to the plasma membrane and are localized independent of lysosomes. Unsuccessful fusion will show the DiI localization within the cell’s cytoplasm and colocalization with lysosomes (Figure 1c).
Figure 1: Fusogenic porous silicon nanoparticle system (F-pSiNP). (a) Schematic showing endocytic uptake of conventional nanoparticles and subsequent endosomal entrapment. (b) Schematic showing fusogenic uptake of the F-pSiNPs and subsequent cytosolic delivery of the siRNA payload. (c) Confocal microscopic image of a CAOV-3 cell that has endocytosed non-fusogenic pSiNPs that were loaded with DiI lipophilic dye. CAOV-3 cells were grown to 80% confluence in a 6 well-plate, and treated with 10 µL of nanoparticles, and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 15 min. The cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde to be mounted on glass slides with DAPI, dried and kept in the dark until examined by confocal microscopy. (D) Confocal microscopic image of a CAOV-3 cell that has taken up fusogenic pSiNPs that were loaded with DiI lipophilic dye. Cells were pre-stained with LysoTracker Green for 1 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 according to manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were then washed PBS three times, and were treated with 10 μL of DiI-loaded particles for 15 min. The cells were washed with PBS three times to remove any particles that were not taken up, and the wells were filled with 1 mL of PBS and immediately taken for live-cell imaging by confocal microscopy; DAPI represents nuclear stain and Lysosome represents lysosomal staining by LysoTracker Green; scale bar represents 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Etch cell setup. (a) Schematic showing etch cell components and assembly order; and (b) diagram of setup for electrochemical etching of silicon. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Photograph of final F-pSiNP product. (a) Successful synthesis showing homogenous and cloudy solution; (b) unsuccessful synthesis showing aggregation of particles (yellow). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Repeated freeze-thaw cycle of fusogenic pSiNPs cause aggregation. (a) Average size and zeta-potential of fusogenic pSiNPs remains steady for 30 days when thawed once post-freezing; (b) Average size and zeta-potential of the fusogenic pSiNPs shows signs of aggregation and loss of structural integrity within 4 days after undergoing daily freeze-thaw cycles. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 5). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Diagram of porous silicon nanoparticle synthesis. Schematic showing electrochemical etching of silicon wafer (Step 1.4), lift-off of the porous layer (Step 1.5), sonication of the porous layer into particles, and collection of porous silicon nanoparticles (Step 1.6). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Synthesis of porous silicon nanoparticles is shown in Figure 5. The critical step in the synthesis of fusogenic pSiNPs is in the loading step (step 3). If the fusogenic nanoparticles are aggregating post-synthesis (Figure 3), the reason may be due to the following: (1) calcium chloride stock was not homogenously prepared, thus step 3.1.2 must be carefully followed or refined; or (2) the ratio of pSiNP : siRNA : CaCl2 or the concentration of one or more of the three components may not be optimal. Re-optimization starting from the CaCl2 concentration is suggested (e.g., altering from 2 M to 1 M or 3 M). Moreover, it is important to make sure that the CaCl2 is from the same vendor, as we found that the same chemical from different vendors resulted in lower pH at the loading step, and subsequent failure to load the siRNA. The pSiNPs may also be concentrated, diluted, or further degraded prior to the loading process by leaving the particles suspended in the RNAse-free water for 2 days after step 1.6.6.
Post-loading, the lipid coating often leads to difficulty in extrusion due to the concentration or density of the particles (step 4). If the extrusion membrane is clogged, forcing the extrusion may rip the membrane. Upon clogging, disassemble the extruder, and replace the membrane and the supports with a new set if the loss from clogging is small. If the loss is great, then dilute the particle suspension, and sonicate for 30 s prior to extrusion. If the problem persists, re-optimization of pSiNP size and loading ratio to minimize aggregates is advised. Lastly, we suggest filtering the particle suspension through a 0.22 µm-pore filter to eliminate any contaminants or aggregates prior to cell or animal treatment. Filtering is especially advised if the particles were synthesized in a non-sterile environment, or after thawing a frozen aliquot of the particles.
The fusogenicity of the particles may be validated by confocal microscopy (as shown in Figure 1c, d), and by transmission electron microscopy of the cells treated with the particles to observe for lipid-shed porous silicon cores in the cytoplasm15.
The fusogenic pSiNPs and its synthesis protocol have a few limitations. For in vitro gene silencing applications, the presented fusogenic pSiNPs have proven to induce >90% knockdown efficiency in a range of cell lines at the 100 nM dose; including the Neuro-2a mouse neuroblastoma cell line, the CAOV-3 human ovarian cancer cell line, and the notoriously difficult-to-transfect RAW 264.7 mouse macrophage cell line. However, we have observed >50% knockdown efficiency at as low as 25 nM dose, which was comparable to that of Lipofectamine. While cationic lipids must be used minimally to reduce cytotoxic effect, we have previously demonstrated its safety at a lipid dose of as high as 1 mg15. For in vivo gene silencing applications, the fusogenic pSiNPs are limited by selectivity. As the cationic lipids electrostatically attract to any cell membrane, the particles must be used as a local therapeutic, or be surface modified with a targeting moiety (e.g., peptides, antibodies, etc.). The synthesis protocol for fusogenic pSiNPs is currently optimized and limited for siRNA delivery only. The same method has been verified to successfully load miRNA, and is hypothesized to be able to load mRNA, cDNA, and other larger nucleotide payloads, but these have yet to be optimized.
The presented work makes a significant contribution to the field of gene therapy. The standard benchmark for in vitro gene silencing is the Lipofectamine 2000. We have demonstrated that the fusogenic pSiNPs can induce knockdown effect of comparable, if not higher, efficiencies15. The major advantage of the fusogenic pSiNPs over Lipofectamine 2000 is its ability to be used for in vivo applications with systemic injections. While other agents, such as Invivofectamine 3.0, have been commercialized for in vivo uses, they are only suitable for liver delivery, and require chemically modified siRNAs (with or without overhangs, or in locked nucleic acid (LNA) structure) to increase stability and specificity.16,17,18 However, the fusogenic pSiNPs can be modified post-synthesis to conjugate targeting moieties with simple thiol-maleimide chemistry, wherein a thiol group in the targeting peptide (which carries an extra cysteine for this purpose) binds a double-bonded carbon in the maleimide ring at the end of PEGylated lipids in the fusogenic coating. Moreover, the high mass loading and delivery efficacy to the cell cytoplasm minimizes the necessity for intracellular specificity and attains strong gene silencing effect with non-modified siRNAs15. One drawback of the fusogenic pSiNPs is that the synthesis protocol is a multi-day process that is more complex than the commercially available transfection agents. However, while the benchmark products must be freshly prepared prior to transfection to obtain the best results, the fusogenic pSiNPs may be aliquoted and frozen for at least 30 days without diminishing the knockdown efficiency.
Future applications for this method include optimization for loading and delivery of larger nucleic acid payloads, such as mRNAs and cDNAs. Additionally, delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 protein-sgRNA complex, or a cocktail of the Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA, is also a development option, as the system is optimal for loading anionic payloads. Overall, the F-pSiNP system is a modular nanoplatform for gene therapy to treat diseases beyond infections, including viral infections, cancer, and autoimmune diseases.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work is supported by National Institutes of Health through contract # R01 AI132413-01.
1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) | Avanti Polar Lipids | 850345P | Powder |
1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (chloride salt) (DOTAP) | Avanti Polar Lipids | 890890P | Powder |
1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[maleimide(polyethylene glycol)-2000] (ammonium salt) (DSPE-PEG(2000) Maleimide) | Avanti Polar Lipids | 880126P | Powder |
Aluminum foil | VWR International, LLC | 12175-001 | |
Calcium chloride (CaCl2) | Spectrum | C1977 | Anhydrous, Pellets |
Chloroform | Fisher Scientific | C6061 | |
Computer | Dell | Dimension 9200 | Any computer with PCI card slot is acceptable |
Dil Stain (1,1'-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine Perchlorate ('DiI'; DiIC18(3))) | Life Technologies | D3911 | |
Ethanol (EtOH) | UCSD Store | 111 | 200 Proof |
Hydrofluric acid (HF) | VWR International, LLC | MK264008 | Purity: 48% |
Keithley 2651a Sourcemeter | Keithley | 2651A | |
LabVIEW | National Instruments | Sample program available at: http://sailorgroup.ucsd.edu/sofware/ | |
LysoTracker Green DND-26 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | L7526 | |
Liposome extrusion set with heating block | Avanti Polar Lipids | 610000 | |
Microcon-30kDa Centrifugal Filter Unit | EMD Millipore | MRCF0R030 | |
O-ring | ChemGlass | CG-305-220 | |
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 10010-049 | |
Platinum coil | VWR International, LLC | AA10285-BU | |
Potassium hydroxide (KOH) | Fisher Scientific | P250-3 | |
Silicon wafer | Siltronix | Custom order | |
siRNA | Dharmacon | Custom order | IRF5, sense 5’-dTdT-CUG CAG AGA AUA ACC CUG A-dTdT-3’ and antisense 5’-dTdT UCA GGG UUA UUC UCU GCA G dTdT-3’ |
Sonicator | VWR International, LLC | 97043-960 | |
Targeting peptide (CRV) | CPC Scientific | Custom order | sequence CRVLRSGSC; made cyclic by a disulfide bond between the side chains of the two cysteine residues |
Teflon etch cell | Interface Performance Materials, Inc. | Custom order | |
UltraPure DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 10977015 |