Antigen-specific T cells are difficult to characterize or utilize in therapies due to their extremely low frequency. Herein, we provide a protocol to develop a magnetic particle which can bind to antigen-specific T cells to enrich these cells and then to expand them several hundred-fold for both characterization and therapy.
We have developed a tool to both enrich and expand antigen-specific T cells. This can be helpful in cases such as to A) detect the existence of antigen-specific T cells, B) probe the dynamics of antigen-specific responses, C) understand how antigen-specific responses affect disease state such as autoimmunity, D) demystify heterogeneous responses for antigen-specific T cells, or E) utilize antigen-specific cells for therapy. The tool is based on a magnetic particle that we conjugate antigen-specific and T cell co-stimulatory signals, and that we term as artificial antigen presenting cells (aAPCs). Consequently, since the technology is simple to produce, it can easily be adopted by other laboratories; thus, our purpose here is to describe in detail the fabrication and subsequent use of the aAPCs. We explain how to attach antigen-specific and co-stimulatory signals to the aAPCs, how to utilize them to enrich for antigen-specific T cells, and how to expand antigen-specific T cells. Furthermore, we will highlight engineering design considerations based on experimental and biological information of our experience with characterizing antigen-specific T cells.
With the rise of many immunotherapies, there is a need to be able to characterize and control immune responses. In particular, the adaptive immune response is of interest because of the specificity and durability of the cells. Recently, chimeric-antigen-receptor T cell therapies have been approved for cancer therapy; however, the antigen-receptors are based off the common cell surface antigen CD19, instead of the antigens specific to the cancer1. Beyond the specificity, immunotherapies can also suffer from the lack of control, and limited understanding the dynamic immune response within cancer or autoimmunity.
One of the challenges of studying antigen-specific responses is their extremely low frequency, e.g., antigen-specific T cells are 1 of every 104 to 106 T cells2,3. Thus, to investigate which T cells are present or responding, the cells need to either be enriched and expanded, or their signal need to be amplified. It is expensive and difficult to maintain the feeder cells using current techniques that focus on the expansion of antigen-specific cells. Current techniques that focus on amplifying the signal of antigen-specific T cells, like the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay, limit the re-use of those T cells4. Finally, because of low sensitivity, often these two techniques need to be combined for antigen-specific enumeration.
To address these issues, we have developed the magnetic nanoparticle-based artificial antigen presenting cell (aAPC)5,6,7,8. The aAPC can be functionalized with an antigen-specific signal-peptide loaded major histocompatibility complex (pMHC)-and co-stimulatory molecules-e.g., an anti-CD28 antibody-to both enrich antigen-specific T cells and then subsequently stimulate their expansion (Figure 1). The particles can thus be a cost-effective off-the-shelf product that can be both customized to meet antigen-specific stimulations yet standardized across experiments and patients. Performing the enrichment and expansion process results in hundreds to thousands-fold expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and can result in frequencies up to 60 percent after just one week, enabling the characterization or therapeutic use of the large number of cells. Herein, we describe how to make nanoparticle aAPCs, some critical design considerations in choosing the nanoparticle properties, and demonstrate some typical results from utilizing these particles in isolating and expanding rare antigen-specific CD8+ T cells.
All mice were maintained per guidelines approved by the Johns Hopkins University's Institutional Review Board.
1. Load Dimeric Major Histocompatibility Complex Immunoglobulin Fusion Protein (MHC-Ig) with Desired Antigen Peptide Sequence.
NOTE: If using H-2Kb:Ig, then follow the protocol detailed in Step 1.1; if using H-2Db:Ig, then follow the protocol detailed in Step 1.2.
2. Conjugate MHC-peptide Complexes and Co-Stimulatory Molecules to the Surface of Magnetic Nanoparticles to Form Nanoparticle Artificial Antigen Presenting Cells. Use One of Three Different Methods Depending on Particle Size and Application.
NOTE: A number of different techniques can be used to conjugate the proteins to the surface of the particles. Herein, 3 separate approaches are described: amine-coated particles (Step 2.1), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-coated particles (Step 2.2), and anti-biotin-coated particles (Step 2.3). These processes have also been described in detail within the methods section of two papers published6,7. Perform all steps in a biosafety fume hood with sterile solutions to maintain the sterility of stock aAPC particles.
3. Characterize the Protein Content on Artificial Antigen Presenting Cell Nanoparticles Using Fluorescent Antibody Detection.
NOTE: This is a useful quality control of the produced artificial antigen presenting cells. Also, the amount of stimulatory signal is used to produce equivalent aAPC doses across batches and various aAPC types (e.g., different sizes).
4. Enrich Antigen-specific CD8+ T Cells with Prepared Nanoparticle Artificial Antigen Presenting Cells.
5. Expand and Detect Antigen-specific CD8+ T Cells with Prepared Nanoparticle Artificial Antigen Presenting Cells.
To complete a successful enrichment and expansion of antigen-specific T cells, the peptide-loaded MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules should be successfully attached to the aAPC particle. Based on the 3 methods of particle attachment, we provide some representative data for a successful conjugation procedure outcome (Figure 5a). Indeed, if the ligand density is too low, then there will not be effective stimulation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells where this occurs around linear spacing between the ligands above 100 nm in our experience (Figure 5b)7.
Besides both quantitative fluorescent antibody readouts and transgenic CD8+ T cell expansions, nanoparticle aAPCs can be checked for quality control by doping in cognate transgenic antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. This can be done by isolating CD8+ T cells from a transgenic mouse such as a Pmel mouse which has gp100-specific antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and doping into a B6 background at a 1:1000 ratio. Counting and staining before and after enrichment allows the enumeration of both the fold enrichment (Figure 6a) and percent recovery (Figure 6b)6. In these representative results, we demonstrate that signal-1 only aAPCs provide the most efficient enrichment (nearly 10-fold) and around 80% cell recovery, which is enhanced over traditional signal 1 and 2 aAPCs which have non-specific anti-CD28 on the particle as well.
Once particle aAPCs have been sufficiently characterized and quality controlled, then they can be used in the enrichment and expansion of rare antigen-specific CD8+ T cells from wildtype mice. For accurate results, it is critical to have functional detection reagents, such as the biotinylated dimer. The quality control of the biotinylated dimer can also be done on transgenic CD8+ T cells to verify staining. Here, representative results show the positive staining with gp100-specific CD8+ T cells with B6 CD8+ T cells as a background control (Figure 7). Figure 7 also demonstrates that if there are too high of levels of the biotinylated dimer, then it will decrease its avidity as it will compete with itself and exhibit mono-valent binding.
After the enrichment and expansion of mouse CD8+ T cells for seven days, one might expect between 5 and 50 percent antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, with nearly 20,000 to 200,000 antigen-specific CD8+ T cells after starting with 5 x 106 CD8+ T cells per condition (Figure 8)6. Specifically, when staining for antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, it is critical to know the background staining of the biotinylated dimer, where in this case it was 4.15%; any percentage lower than this from the cognate stain is considered a negative result (Figure 8a). Additionally, this will show where to draw the flow cytometry gates to determine the actual percentage of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. This is important in cases where antigen-specific CD8+ T cells do not have distinct populations (as shown in Figure 8a) but may appear as a broad smear.
The same process can be used to isolate and stimulate human antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Similar quality control and results should be seen where substantial increases in percentages and numbers of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells are observed after only one week of expansion following the enrichment (Figure 9)5.
Figure 1: Schematic of the process of antigen-specific enrichment and expansion using nanoparticle artificial antigen-presenting cells. First, complete a no-touch CD8+ T cell isolation. Then, add nanoparticle aAPCs to the CD8+ T cells. Enrich with a magnetic field, culture, and stimulate with aAPCs. Finally, detect enriched and expanded antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Schematic for conjugating peptide-loaded MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules to the surface of amine-coated magnetic particles. Briefly, Sulfo-SMCC crosslinker is used to functionalize the magnetic particle surface with maleimide functional groups. MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules are simultaneously functionalized with Traut's reagents to produce thiol functional groups. The activated particles and protein signals are reacted together and then washed to produce antigen-specific artificial antigen-presenting cell magnetic nanoparticles. This figure has been modified from supplemental material of our laboratory's publication in Nano Letters7. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Schematic for conjugating peptide-loaded MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules to the surface of NHS-coated magnetic particles. Briefly, the NHS-coated particles are reacted together with peptide-loaded MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules and then washed to produce antigen-specific artificial antigen-presenting cell magnetic nanoparticles. This figure has been modified from supplemental material of our laboratory's publication in Nano Letters7. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Schematic for conjugating peptide-loaded MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules to the surface of anti-biotin-coated magnetic particles. MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules are functionalized with NHS-biotin to produce biotin functional groups. Then the anti-biotin-coated particles are reacted together with the functionalized peptide-loaded MHC-Ig and co-stimulatory molecules. Afterwards, these particles are washed to produce antigen-specific artificial antigen-presenting cell magnetic nanoparticles. This figure has been modified from supplemental material of our laboratory's publication in Nano Letters7. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Conjugation efficiency is critical for the enrichment and expansion of antigen-specific T cells. (a) Representative data for conjugation efficiency with the three conjugation methods to three different base magnetic particles described in the paper: amine-coated particles, NHS-coated particles, and anti-biotin-coated particles. Each data point represents a different particle preparation technique and error bars represent S.E.M. (b) How ligand density affects transgenic CD8+ T cell stimulation, where the ligand density is represented as linear spacing between ligands in nanometers on 600 nm and 50 nm aAPCs (n = 5 and error bars represent S.E.M.). This figure has been modified from our laboratory's publication in Nano Letters7. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Quality control of aAPC enrichment. Transgenic Pmel gp100-specific CD8+ T cells were doped in at a 1:1000 ratio into wildtype B6 CD8+ T cells. (a) Fold enrichment was measured using flow cytometry following the enrichment by staining the congenic marker Thy1.1 and CD8. Here was a comparison between signal 1 only particles or Db-Ig loaded with gp100, traditional signal 1 and 2 particles or Db-Ig loaded with gp100 and anti-CD28, and non-cognate signal 1 and 2 particles. (b) Cells were also counted before and after to measure the cell recovery by each of the methods. Data represents three independent experiments and error bars represent S.E.M. Data combined was measured by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01). This figure has been modified from our laboratory's publication in Nano Letters6. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Quality control of biotinylated dimer. Gp100-specific CD8+ T cells were isolated from a transgenic Pmel mouse and stained in 100 µL of PBS with three concentrations of biotinylated Db-Ig loaded with gp100 and APC anti-CD8a, using wildtype B6 CD8+ T cells as a negative control. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Enrichment and expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. B6 wildtype CD8+ T cells were enriched with either signal 1 only (Kb-Ig loaded with TRP2) or signal 1 and 2 (Kb-Ig loaded with TRP2 and anti-CD28 conjugated to the surface of the particle). Signal 2 was then added to the enriched fraction of signal 1 only aAPCs and all cells were cultured for 7 days. (a) CD8+ T cells are stained and gated on a live/dead fluorescent stain, then gated CD8+ and KbTRP2+, and compared to a non-cognate Kb-Ig to detect antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. (b) percentage and (c) number of TRP2-specific CD8+ T cells could thus be determined, where higher percentages and numbers of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells could be detected from the signal 1 only enrichment approach (n=7, error bars represent standard deviation, two-tailed paired t test *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). This figure has been modified from our laboratory's publication in Nano Letters6. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: Enrichment and expansion of human antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. (a) Representative flow cytometry plots on day 0 before the enrichment and day 7 show the dramatic effects of enriching and expanding antigen-specific CD8+ T cells from healthy donors with traditional nanoparticle aAPCs where A2-Ig loaded with NY-ESO1 and A2-Ig loaded with MART1 antigens are shown. (b) This generates high percentages (~10-20%) and numbers (0.5-1 x 106) of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by day 7 (n = 3 from independent donors, error bars represent S.E.M.). This figure has been modified from our laboratory's publication in ACS Nano5. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary File 1-Box 1. Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary File 2-Box 2. Please click here to download this file.
We have created a novel antigen-specific T cell isolation technology based on nanoparticle artificial antigen presenting cells (aAPCs). Nanoparticle aAPCs have peptide-loaded MHC on the surface that allows antigen-specific T cell binding and activation alongside co-stimulatory activation. aAPCs are also paramagnetic, and thus can be used to enrich rare antigen-specific T cells using a magnetic field. We have optimized and studied key nanoparticle properties of size, ligand density, and ligand choice and their influence on binding, enrichment, activation, and cell-enrichment (Supplementary File 1-Box 1).
Thus, the enrichment and expansion procedure results in antigen-specific CD8+ T cell expansion of several thousand-fold producing antigen-specific percentages as high as 60% and, can be used in both murine and human settings (Supplementary File 2-Box 2). Such high numbers and percentages of antigen-specific T cells enable the characterization of immune responses for diseases (e.g., cancer, autoimmune, etc.), allow for the discovery of novel immune targets and mechanisms, and offer the opportunity to be used in adoptive immunotherapy. An example of a specific application is to sequence a patient's tumor, identify mutations, locate potential MHC-binders from the mutant sequences, produce aAPCs with those top candidate antigens, and then utilize the aAPCs to determine whether the patient has any tumor-specific neoantigens.
Indeed, methodological limitations have been a key barrier to studying and identifying antigen-specific responses. Current techniques (a) require substantial time- and work-intensive procedures, (b) present difficulty in maintaining cell lines such as the need to collect autologous dendritic cells, (c) require weeks of T cell expansion prior to obtaining results, (d) result in low specificities (1-2%) and low numbers of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells, (e) often with significant background signal, and (f) the CD8+ T cells that are produced often cannot be used or studied in further assays. One method requires immunization with antigen prior to ELISPOT to characterize the presence of antigen-specific response14,15,16,17. Another method utilizing tandem-mini-gene expression plasmids to transfect antigen presenting cells requires multiplexing tetramer stains with cytokine+ responses such as IFNγ to increase the sensitivity18. Even peptide pulsing endogenous antigen presenting cells in in vitro culture, only results in a 0.5% increase in antigen specificity15.
Our approach solves these methodological limitations and can thus act as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Critical steps to ensuring antigen-specific CD8+ T cell enrichment and expansion are to 1) effectively load MHC-Ig with peptide antigen, 2) conjugate stimulatory signals to the surface of nanoparticles, 3) bind the particles to T cells, 4) enrich the cells bound to the nanoparticles with a magnetic field, 5) expand eluted nanoparticle-bound T cells in culture, and 6) detect antigen-specific CD8+ T cells on day 7 with biotinylated, peptide-loaded MHC.
The main problems that emerge in the enrichment and expansion protocol arise from either improper production or expired detection reagents or nanoparticle aAPCs. Ensure that the biotinylated dimer can stain antigen-specific CD8+ T cells with testing on transgenic antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. If the peptide-MHC-Ig does not have a corresponding transgenic mouse model, it can be helpful to load a positive control peptide and test the positive control to verify loading. However, some peptides may not load into the MHC-Ig; this can be simulated with MHC-loading algorithms such as Net-MHC, or experimentally with RMAS-cell based assays13. aAPC particle stability may decrease after 6 months, so if there is some variability in enrichment and expansion results, then another fluorescent plate reader assay may be performed to verify the stability.
In future work, we aim to extend the capabilities, breadth, and depth of the assay. We are working on increasing both the throughput and the ability to multiplex with multiple antigens investigated at one time in a 96-well plate format. Currently, a main limitation is that only a few antigens can be investigated simultaneously. We are working this by investigating how the size of the particle aAPC and ligand density influences enrichment. Additionally, we are examining how different cell compositions effect CD8+ T cell expansion within culture. Finally, we aim to mimic this technology within MHC class II to be able to enrich and expand antigen-specific CD4+ T cells.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
J.W.H. thanks the NIH Cancer Nanotechnology Training Center at the Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1232825), and the ARCS foundation for fellowship support. This work was funded by support from the National Institutes of Health (P01-AI072677, R01-CA108835, R21-CA185819), TEDCO/Maryland Innovation Initiative, and the Coulter Foundation (JPS).
DimerX I: Recombinant Soluble Dimeric Human HLA-A2:Ig Fusion Protein | BD Biosciences | 551263 | |
DimerX I: Recombinant Soluble Dimeric Mouse H-2D[b]:Ig | BD Biosciences | 551323 | |
DimerX I: Recombinant Soluble Dimeric Mouse H-2K[b]:Ig Fusion Protein | BD Biosciences | 550750 | |
Vivaspin 20 MWCO 50 000 | GE Life Sciences | 28932362 | |
Vivaspin 2 MWCO 50 000 | GE Life Sciences | 28932257 | |
Purified Human Beta 2 Microglobulin | Bio-Rad | PHP135 | |
nanomag-D-spio, NH2, 100 nm nanoparticles | Micromod | 79-01-102 | |
Super Mag NHS Activated Beads, 0.2 µm | Ocean Nanotech | SN0200 | |
Anti-Biotin MicroBeads UltraPure | Miltenyi | 130-105-637 | |
EZ-Link NHS-Biotin | ThermoFisher | 20217 | |
Sulfo-SMCC Crosslinker | ProteoChem | c1109-100mg | |
2-Iminothiolane hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | I6256 Sigma | |
96 Well Half-Area Microplate, black polystyrene | Corning | 3875 | |
FITC Rat Anti-Mouse Ig, λ1, λ2, & λ3 Light Chain Clone R26-46 | BD Biosciences | 553434 | |
FITC Mouse Anti-Armenian and Syrian Hamster IgG Clone G192-1 | BD Biosciences | 554026 | |
B6.Cg-Thy1a/Cy Tg(TcraTcrb)8Rest/J (transgenic PMEL) mice | Jackson Laboratory | 005023 | |
C57BL/6J (B6 wildtype) mice | Jackson Laboratory | 000664 | |
CD8a+ T Cell Isolation Kit, Mouse | Miltenyi | 130-104-075 | |
MS Columns | Miltenyi | 130-042-201 | |
LS Columns | Miltenyi | 130-042-401 | |
Streptavidin-Phycoerythrin, SAv-PE | Biolegend | 405203 | |
N52 disk magnets of 0.75 inches | K&J Magnetics | DX8C-N52 | |
APC anti-mouse CD8a Antibody, clone 53-6.7 | Biolegend | 100711 | |
LIVE/DEAD Fixable Green Dead Cell Stain Kit, for 488 nm excitation | ThermoFisher | L-34969 |