This work details a standard immunohistochemistry method to visualize motor neuron projections of late stage-16 Drosophila melanogaster embryos. The filleted preparation of fixed embryos stained with FasII antibody provides a powerful tool to characterize the genes required for motor axon pathfinding and target recognition during neural development.
The establishment of functional neuromuscular circuits relies on precise connections between developing motor axons and target muscles. Motor neurons extend growth cones to navigate along specific pathways by responding to a large number of axon guidance cues that emanate from the surrounding extracellular environment. Growth cone target recognition also plays a critical role in neuromuscular specificity. This work presents a standard immunohistochemistry protocol to visualize motor neuron projections of late stage-16 Drosophila melanogaster embryos. This protocol includes a few key steps, including a genotyping procedure, to sort the desired mutant embryos; an immunostaining procedure, to tag embryos with fasciclin II (FasII) antibody; and a dissection procedure, to generate filleted preparations from fixed embryos. Motor axon projections and muscle patterns in the periphery are much better visualized in flat preparations of filleted embryos than in whole-mount embryos. Therefore, the filleted preparation of fixed embryos stained with FasII antibody provides a powerful tool to characterize the genes required for motor axon pathfinding and target recognition, and it can also be applied to both loss-of-function and gain-of-function genetic screens.
Precise and selective connections between motor axons and target muscles during embryonic development are essential for normal locomotion in Drosophila larvae. The embryonic patterning of 30 muscle fibers in each of the abdominal hemisegments A2-A7 is established by stage 161. The 36 motor neurons that are generated in the ventral nerve cord extend their axons into the periphery to innervate specific target muscles2. Motor axon pathfinding and target recognition can be visualized by immunohistochemistry with an antibody (mouse monoclonal antibody 1D4)3,4. Multiple images of the motor axon projection patterns in wildtype embryos are available on the web5. The 1D4 antibody labels all motor axons and three longitudinal axon fascicles on each side of the midline of the embryonic central nervous system (CNS)4,6 (Figure 1C and Figure 2A). Therefore, immunohistochemistry with FasII antibody provides a powerful tool for identifying genes required for neuromuscular connectivity for demonstrating the molecular mechanisms underlying motor axon guidance and target recognition.
In each of the abdominal hemisegments A2-A7, motor axons project and selectively fasciculate into two principal nerve branches, the segmental nerve (SN) and the intersegmental nerve (ISN)2,4, and a minor nerve branch, the transverse nerve (TN)7. The SN selectively defasciculates to give rise to two nerve branches called the SNa and SNc, whereas the ISN splits into three nerve branches called the ISN, ISNb, and ISNd2,4. Among them, ISN, ISNb, and SNa motor axon projection patterns are most precisely visualized when late stage-16 embryos are stained with FasII antibody and are filleted (Figure 1C and Figure 2A). The ISN motor neurons extend their axons to innervate dorsal muscles 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 18, 19, and 202,4 (Figure 2A). The ISNb motor neurons innervate ventrolateral muscles 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 28, and 302,4 (Figure 2A and 2B). The SNa nerve branch projects to innervate lateral muscles 5, 8, 21, 22, 23, and 242,4 (Figure 2A). The TN, which consists of two motor axons, projects ipsilaterally along the segmental border to innervate muscle 25 and makes synapses with the lateral bipolar dendritic neuron (LBD) in the periphery7 (Figure 2A). These target muscle innervations require not only selective defasciculation of motor axons at specific choice points, but also target muscle recognition. In addition, some putative mesodermal guidepost cells that act as intermediate targets were found in both the ISN and SNa pathways, but not along the ISNb pathway4. This might suggest that ISNb motor axon pathfinding can be regulated in a distinct manner compared to ISN and SNa motor axon guidance, and it also indicates that peripheral motor axon guidance provides an attractive experimental model to study the differential or conserved roles of a single guidance cue molecule8.
This work presents a standard method to visualize the axonal projection patterns of embryonic motor neurons in Drosophila. The described protocols include how to dissect fixed embryos stained with 1D4 antibody and processed in 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) for filleted preparations. One critical advantage of the flat preparations of fixed embryos is the better visualization of the axonal projections and muscle patterns in the periphery. Furthermore, this work also shows how to genotype fixed embryos to sort the desired mutant embryos using the LacZ staining method.
1. Preparation
2. Embryo Collection (Day 1)
3. Preparation of Embryos for Immunostaining (Day 2)
4. Genotyping the Embryos Using LacZ Staining (Day 2)
5. Immunostaining of Embryos with Anti-Fasciclin II Antibodies (Day 2-3)
6. Staging, Dissecting, Mounting, and Imaging the Embryos (Day 4)
Precise connections between motor axons and target muscles during neural development depend on selective axon-axon repulsion and target recognition at specific choice points4. In Drosophila, selective repulsion between motor axons is in part regulated by the combined action of class 1 and 2 semaphorins (Semas), including Sema-1a, Sema-2a, and Sema-2b8,14,15,16,17,18. Therefore, loss of Sema-1a function frequently results in the failure of ISNb axons to defasciculate at specific choice points, causing them to exhibit an abnormally thick morphology (arrowhead in Figure 2C). In wildtype embryos, at least 7 motor neurons extend and fasciculate their axons to form an ISNb nerve branch (Figure 2A). When the ISNb nerve branch reaches a choice point, which is located between muscles 6 and 7, two axons selectively defasciculate from the main ISNb bundle and subsequently innervate muscles 6 and 7 (Figure 2B). At the next choice point, which is located between muscles 6, 13, and 30, another three motor axons selectively defasciculate to innervate muscles 13, 14, and 30 (Figure 2B). The remaining two axons extend dorsally to reach the last choice point near the edge of muscle 12, thereby innervating muscle 12 in the opposite direction (Figure 2B). These results clearly show that the filleted preparation protocol provides a useful tool to study the genes required for motor axon guidance.
Figure 1: Staging of embryos based on the projection patterns of ISN and ISNb motor axons. (A) In late stage-16 wildtype embryos, A7, A8, and A9 ISN nerves (arrows) converge to touch each other (arrowhead). Anterior is left and ventral is down. The Scale bar = 15 µm. (B) In mid-stage-16 wildtype embryos, the A7 ISN nerve extends in parallel with A8/A9 nerves (square bracket). Arrows indicate A7, A8, and A9 ISN nerves. Anterior is left and ventral is down. The Scale bar = 15 µm. (C) Filleted preparation of late stage-16 wildtype embryos stained with FasII antibody. The projection axes (arrows) of the left and right A6 ISNb nerves are roughly aligned with the posterior end of the CNS longitudinal axon fascicles (black line). Abdominal segments A1-A7 are labelled at the top. Anterior is left. The Scale bar = 15 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Motor axon projection patterns in wild-type and Sema-1a mutant embryos. (A–C) Filleted preparation of late stage-16 embryos stained with FasII antibody. Anterior is left and ventral is down. Schematic diagrams showing the axonal projection patterns represented in each panel. The Scale bars = 15 µm. (A) A bright field photograph of two sequential abdominal hemisegments, A3 and A4, in wildtype embryos. Three bilaterally symmetric longitudinal axon bundles are present in the CNS. The normal innervation patterns of ISNb, SNa, ISN, and TN motor axons are indicated by the boxes and an arrow in the periphery. The lateral bipolar dendrite neuron (LBD), which innervates the alary muscles, is indicated by an arrowhead. In the schematic diagram, the nerve branches and innervation patterns of the ISNb (in brown), SNa (in blue), ISN (in green), and TN (in yellow) motor neurons and their target muscles are presented. The cell body positions of these motor neurons in the CNS are also shown in their own colors. (B) In wildtype embryos, the ISNb axons project to the ventrolateral muscles, which are numbered, and innervate them at specific choice points (arrows in the DIC image). (C) In Sema-1a loss-of-function mutants, ISNb axons frequently fail to defasciculate from one another between muscles 6 and 13 (arrowhead in the DIC image). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The details of motor axon guidance defects are scored faster and with better accuracy by the filleted preparation of DAB-stained embryos than by laser scanning confocal microscopy of fluorescently labeled ones. Therefore, the filleted preparation of fixed and 1D4-stained embryos is best suited for the functional characterization of guidance cue molecules. Four major classes of guidance cues, including netrins, Slits, semaphorins (Semas), and ephrins, and their cognate receptors have evolutionarily conserved roles across worms, flies, and vertebrates20. Among roundabout (Robo) family molecules that act as receptors for Slits, Drosophila Robo was first identified to mediate repulsive guidance function in the CNS6,21. Semas are a large family of guidance molecules that bind to plexin-containing receptor complexes22. The axon guidance function of Semas was first discovered in the grasshopper CNS14. Subsequently, the class 1 transmembrane semaphorin Sema-1a was extensively characterized in Drosophila. Sema-1a, which functions not only as a ligand for plexin A, but also as a receptor for an unknown ligand, plays an important role in axon-axon repulsion at specific choice points during embryonic neural development15,16,17,18 (Figure 2C).
There are a few common troubleshooting steps that may occur with the current protocol. First, in steps 3.9-3.13, the embryos can be devitellinized with low efficiency if too many or too-small embryos are used in the methanol devitellinization procedure. In this case, it is recommended to use a bed volume of 40-80 µL of fixed embryos for devitellinization at step 3.5. Second, in steps 3.9-3.13, weak X-Gal staining can happen in case of longer exposure to methanol or incomplete heptane removal, since methanol used as a fixative destroys β-Gal activity. In this case, it is best that the devitellinization procedure using methanol in steps 3.9-3.13 is performed as quickly as possible. In addition, residual heptane that is solubilized in methanol may interfere with the staining; therefore, it is best to remove as much methanol as possible in steps 3.11-3.13.
The current filleted preparation protocol can be applied to loss-of-function and gain-of-function genetic screens to identify novel genes that are involved in motor axon pathfinding and target recognition. However, a disadvantage of this protocol is that it is quite time-consuming to dissect fixed embryos to generate filleted preparations. To overcome this problem, phenotypic characterization of the axonal projections can be monitored in a whole-mount preparation of 1D4-stained embryos, although this method provides low-resolution visualization of the axonal projections in the periphery. Nevertheless, the whole-mount preparation protocol has proven to be an efficient approach for screening axon guidance genes4. An alternative protocol using the live dissection of fluorescently labeled embryos was recently developed for systematic screening11. The live dissection protocol allows for relatively rapid preparation for phenotypic analysis11. However, this protocol is not adequate for embryos older than the beginning of stage 1711.
The filleted preparation protocol described here can be used to examine protein expression patterns with different antibodies. In addition, this protocol can also be applied to Drosophila embryos at various stages of development.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
I thank Alex L. Kolodkin, as I learned this filleted preparation protocol in his laboratory. I also thank Young Gi Hong for technical assistance. This study was supported by NRF-2013R1A1A4A01011329 (S.J.).
Bovine Serum Albumin | Sigma-Aldrich | A7906 | |
Triton X-100 | Sigma-Aldrich | X100 | t-Octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol |
16% Paraformaldehyde Solution | Ted Pella | 18505 | |
Sodium Chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | S5886 | |
Potassium Chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | P5405 | |
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic | Sigma-Aldrich | 30435 | |
Sodium Phosphate Monobasic | Sigma-Aldrich | 71500 | |
X-Gal Substrate | US Biological | X1000 | X-Gal (5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-b-D-galactoside galactopyranoside) |
Dimethyl Sulfxide | Sigma-Aldrich | D4540 | |
Magnesium Chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | M8266 | |
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(II) trihydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | P9387 | |
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) | Sigma-Aldrich | 244023 | |
Hydrogen Peroxide | Sigma-Aldrich | 216763 | |
3,3'-diaminobenzidine Tetrahydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | D5905 | |
Agar | US Biological | A0930 | |
Sucrose | Fisher Scientific | S5-3 | |
Tegosept (Methy 4-Hydroxybenzoate) | Sigma-Aldrich | H5501 | |
Culture Dish (60 mm) | Corning | 430166 | |
Tricon Beaker | Simport | B700-100 | This is used to make a plastic beaker cage for embryo collection. |
Yeast | Societe Industrielle Lesaffre | Saf Instant Yeast Red | |
Cotton Swab (Wooden Single Tip Cotton PK100) | VWR | 14220-263 | |
Eppendorf Tube (1.5 ml) | Sarstedt | #72.690 | |
Bleach | The Clorox Company | Clorox | |
Heptane | Sigma-Aldrich | 246654 | |
Methanol | J.T. Baker | UN1230 | |
Normal Goat Serum | Life Technologies | 16210-064 | |
Anti-FasciculinII Antibody | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | 1D4 anti-Fasciclin II | |
Goat Anti-mouse-HRP Antibody | Jackson Immunoresearch | 115-006-068 | AffiniPure F(ab')2 Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG+IgM (H+L) (min X Hu, Bov, Hrs Sr Prot |
Glycerol | Sigma-Aldrich | G9012 | |
Slide Glass | Duran Group | 235501403 | |
Coverslip | Duran Group | 235503104 | 18 x 18 mm |
1 ml Syringe | Becton Dickinson Medical(s) | 301321 | |
Tungsten Needle | Ted Pella | #27-11 | Tungsten Wire, ø0.13mm/6.1m (ø.005"/20 ft.) |
Nutator (Mini twister) | Korean Science | KO.VS-96TWS | Alternatively, BD Clay Adams Brand Nutator (BD 421125) |