Quantification of Self-renewal in Murine Mammosphere Cultures

Thalia Vlachou; Xieraili Aobuli; Errico D'Elia; Angela Santoro; Maria Cristina Moroni; Pier Giuseppe Pelicci

doi:10.3791/60256

JoVE Journal > Developmental Biology

Biología del desarrollo

Quantification of Self-renewal in Murine Mammosphere Cultures

Published: November 26, 2019

doi:

10.3791/60256

Thalia Vlachou¹, Xieraili Aobuli¹, Errico D’Elia¹, Angela Santoro¹, Maria Cristina Moroni¹, Pier Giuseppe Pelicci^1,2

¹Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO,European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, ²Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology,University of Milan

Summary

Here, we describe the implementation and interpretation of the results of an in vitro mammosphere self-renewal quantitative assay.

Abstract

The mammary gland is characterized by extensive regeneration capacity, as it goes through massive hormonal changes throughout the life cycle of a female. The role of mammary stem cells (MaSCs) is widely studied both in the physiological/developmental context and with regards to breast carcinogenesis. In this aspect, ex vivo studies focused on MaSC properties are highly sought after. Mammosphere cultures represent a surrogate of organ formation and have become a valuable tool for both basic and translational research. Here, we present a detailed protocol for the generation of murine primary mammosphere cultures and the quantitation of MaSC growth properties. The protocol includes mammary gland collection and digestion, isolation of primary mammary epithelial cells (MECs), establishment of primary mammosphere cultures, serial passaging, quantitation of mammosphere growth parameters and interpretation of the results. As an example, we present the effect of low-level constitutive Myc expression on normal MECs leading to increased self-renewal and proliferation.

Introduction

Isolation and in vitro culture of mammary epithelial stem and progenitor cells have become essential for understanding their properties in mammary cell biology. Elegant lineage tracing and serial transplantation assays have enabled the study of stem cells (SCs) and other tissue subsets in the context of their in vivo niche. However, this approach is time consuming and requires the generation of reporter mouse models¹^,²^,³^,⁴^,⁵. Therefore, in vitro culture and propagation of mammary stem cells (MaSCs) while sparing key stemness features, namely self-renewal and differentiation ability, is one of the biggest challenges in the field. In the last years, the mammosphere assay has been widely used to model both normal mammary tissue and breast cancer growth, to quantify normal or cancer SCs (CSCs) and assess their self-renewal ability as a surrogate reporter of their activity in their respective in vivo context⁶^,⁷^,⁸^,⁹^,¹⁰^,¹¹.

The mammosphere assay is an efficient and cost-effective approach, in which freshly isolated mammary epithelial cells (MECs) are cultured in non-adherent conditions, with the premise that only MaSCs will survive and form spheres in suspension while all the other cell types will die by anoikis. Moreover, the ability to form several generations of mammospheres in serial non-adherent passages is related to the self-renewal ability of the MaSCs⁶^,⁹^,¹¹. Here, we describe a detailed protocol of a quantitative mammosphere assay, which was initially developed by Dontu and colleagues⁷ as a modification of the pioneering neurosphere assay¹², enabling the growth of putative SCs in non-adherent, serum-free conditions with the addition of appropriate growth factors⁷^,¹².

Protocol

In vivo procedures were performed in accordance with EU directive 2010/63 and after approval from our institutional ethics committee (Organism for Animal Wellbeing–OPBA) and the Italian Ministry of Health (IACUC Numbers 762/2015 and 537/2017).

1. Murine Mammary Gland Collection and Digestion

For a typical experiment, sacrifice 8-10 weeks-old virgin female mice by CO₂ inhalation. Depending on the aims of the experiment, use 5-30 mice. Place the mice on dissection boards under a hood. Use needles to stretch the forelimbs and wash down the fur of the animal with ethanol.
Lift the skin with forceps and perform a vertical incision starting at the level of the pelvic area and moving all the way to the cervix, leaving the peritoneum intact. To avoid rupturing the skin or the peritoneum, use round-edged scissors.
Carefully detach the skin from the body with gentle movements of the scissors across the lateral axis of the body.
Once the skin is fully detached from the thoracic and abdominal area, perform four incisions across the four limbs of the animal and pin down the skin with needles. Use the scissors and forceps to fully detach the body of the animal from the extended skin.
Use the forceps to gently lift the mammary fat pads that are now fully exposed and carefully detach them from the skin with the aid of the scissors. Collect the lower thoracic and abdominal mammary glands of each mouse and immerse them in Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), in a 50 mL conical tube. Collect up to 20 glands per tube. Keep the tissues on ice.
NOTE: If needed, the glands can remain on ice overnight. This is a safe stopping point. The following steps should be performed under sterile conditions.
Prepare and filter the digestion medium: Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 200 U/mL collagenase and 100 µg/mL hyaluronidase (see Table of Materials).
Transfer up to 20 glands to a 100 mm Petri dish and mince the tissue using a scalpel or curved scissors. Avoid transferring large volumes of DPBS to the dish.
Add 10 mL of digestion medium to each Petri dish and transfer the minced tissue to a 50 mL conical tube, using a 25 mL serological pipette.
Seal the tubes with parafilm and place them on a rotator. Set the rotator at a low speed (0.03 x g) and incubate for 2.5 h at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO₂.
Visually inspect the suspension before proceeding to the next steps. If large pieces of tissue remain undigested, prolong the incubation at 37 °C for another 30 min.
NOTE: As an alternative, the digestion can be performed overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO₂, using a gentle collagenase/hyaluronidase enzyme mix¹³.

2. Isolation of Primary Murine MECs

Stop the rotator and remove the tubes from the incubator. Adjust a P1000 tip at the opening of a 5 mL serological pipette. If the suspension passes through the P1000 tip, proceed to the next steps. Otherwise, prolong the incubation at 37 °C for another 30 min.
Centrifuge at 100 x g, for 5 min at 4 °C. Carefully decant the supernatant and resuspend the pellet of each tube in 3 mL of DPBS.
NOTE: The low centrifugation speed allows the removal of lymphocytes and adipose tissue cells. Gentle manipulation is required to avoid dislodging the pellet at this step.
Filter the cell suspension in each tube separately, using 100, 70 and 40 µm cell strainers. At each filtering step, wash the strainers with 2 mL of DPBS before collecting the pass-through.
NOTE: From this point on, the cell suspensions can be pooled and processed together.
Centrifuge at 300 x g, for 5 min at 4 °C. Carefully decant the supernatant and resuspend the cells in the remaining volume of DPBS.
Proceed to the red blood cell (RBC) lysis by adding an equal volume of ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK) lysis buffer (see Table of Materials). Mix by pipetting and incubate on ice for up to 5 min.
Add 10 mL of DPBS and centrifuge at 300 x g, for 5 min at 4 °C. Carefully decant the supernatant and visually inspect the pellet. If the pellet is white, proceed to the next step. Otherwise repeat the RBC lysis step (step 2.5).
Resuspend the cell pellet in 1-5 mL of mammosphere media: mammary epithelial cell growth basal medium (MEBM), supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 5 µg/mL insulin, 0.5 µg/mL hydrocortisone, 2% B27, 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), 20 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and 0.4 IU/mL heparin (see Table of Materials).

3. Serial Mammosphere Re-plating

For the establishment of mammosphere cultures, plate the cells onto non-tissue culture treated (ultra-low adhesion) 6-well plates at a density of 200,000 viable cells/mL in mammosphere medium. Incubate the cells for 7-10 days at 37 °C, 5% CO₂.
Prepare and filter 1% poly-HEMA solution in 95% ethanol (see Table of Materials). Coat ultra-low adhesion 6-well plates for the following passages, by adding 400 µL of 1% poly-HEMA solution per well and allowing the ethanol to dry completely. For better results, repeat the coating twice.
NOTE: The use of non-coated plates during the first passage allows the selective removal of fibroblasts from the culture.
At the end of the 7-10 days culture, collect the primary mammospheres from all the wells and centrifuge at 300 x g, for 5 min at 4 °C.
Carefully decant the supernatant and proceed to the mechanical dissociation of the mammospheres using a P200 pipette with filtered tips. Pipette for approximately 100 times and visually inspect the suspension for the presence of large spheroids.
NOTE: A short incubation (2-5 min) of the sphere pellet in a low volume (0.2-0.5 mL) of trypsin or Accutase at 37 °C, 5% CO₂, can be used to facilitate mechanical dissociation. Prepare fresh mammosphere medium (step 2.7) for the plating of each passage.
Resuspend in 1-5 mL of fresh mammosphere medium and count the viable cells. If applicable, split the cells in treatment groups or culture conditions.
Plate 20,000 viable cells/mL on poly-HEMA-coated ultra-low adhesion 6-well plates and incubate at 37 °C, 5% CO₂.
NOTE: Mammospheres reach their maximum size within 5-7 days after cell plating. When possible, distribute the cells of each sample or condition to multiple wells to obtain technical replicates. Plating density should be kept low to avoid cell aggregation. A maximum of 20,000 cells/mL is recommended for 6-well plates and 5,000 cells/mL for 24-well plates.
After 5-7 days, count the number of spheres per well. This can be done either manually, using a microscope equipped with a 10x magnification lens, or using digital image analysis (see step 4).
Collect the mammospheres of each well separately and centrifuge at 300 x g, for 5 min at 4 °C.
Carefully decant the supernatant and proceed to the mechanical dissociation of the mammospheres using a P200 pipette with filtered tips. Pipette for approximately 100 times and visually inspect the suspension for the presence of large spheroids.
Resuspend in 1 mL of fresh mammosphere medium and count the viable cells. Pool the cells of each sample or condition and repeat steps 3.6-3.10. Record the number of cells plated and the number of spheres and cells counted per well for each passage. Proceed to step 5 for the cumulative growth calculation.

4. Sphere Enumeration Using Digital Image Analysis (DIA)

At the end of each passage, scan the entire surface of all the wells and acquire images of the spheres using a digital camera mounted on a stereoscope. Save the images as .tif files.
Import the stereoscope images as an Image Sequence using ImageJ¹⁴. Set the scale and the type of image to 8-bit.
Duplicate the stack of images and select Subtract Background from the tab Process on the menu bar. Check the options Light background and Sliding paraboloid and click on the button OK. Process all the images of the stack.
Select Adjust and then Threshold from the tab Image of the menu bar. By clicking on Apply, a dialogue window titled Convert Stack to Binary will appear. Select Default as method and Light as background. Check the box Calculate threshold for each image and click on the button OK.
Select sequentially the commands Watershed, Open and Erode from the Binary list under the tab Process of the menu bar. Process all images of the stack by clicking on the button Yes of the dialogue box that appears.
NOTE: These processes allow for visual segmentation of objects that touch, object smoothing and removal of pixels from the edge of the objects.
Select the function Analyze Particles from the menu Analyze. Set the minimum size threshold at 10,000 µm² and circularity between 0.50 and 1.00. Select the option Ellipses from the Show drop-down menu. Check Summarize, Exclude on edges and In situ Show and click on the button OK. Process all images of the stack.
Visually inspect the correspondence of the ellipses with spheres and, if needed, correct the particle count accordingly. Sum the counts from all the frames of each well to obtain the total count of mammospheres per well.

5. Cumulative Growth Curve Calculation

NOTE: The number of mammospheres counted in each well at the end of each passage (P_N) reflects the number of mammosphere-initiating cells seeded at the beginning of P_N.

For each passage (P_N), register the number of plated cells and the number of cells and spheres counted per well. Calculate the sphere size at the end of each passage:
sphere size P_N (cells / sphere) = cells counted P_N / spheres counted P_N
NOTE: The sphere size at P_N is a measure of the proliferative potential of each mammosphere-initiating cell seeded at P_N.
Infer the number of plated spheres by dividing the number of cells plated for P_N by the sphere size calculated at the end of the previous passage (P_N-1):
spheres plated P_N = cells plated P_N / sphere size P_N-1
NOTE: By convention, the sphere size is assumed stable during the first passage of the culture (i.e., sphere size P₀ = sphere size P₁). If multiple wells are used as technical replicates, use the average sphere size at P_N-1 as denominator.
Calculate the cumulative cell and sphere number for each well per passage:
cumulative number P_N = (count P_N / plated P_N) X cumulative number P_N-1.
NOTE: By convention, cumulative number P₀ = plated P₁. If multiple wells are used as technical replicates, calculate the average cumulative number per sample or condition for each passage.
Plot the data points on a semi-logarithmic scale. Display the passage number (P₀ to P_N) on the x axis (linear scale) and the cumulative cell or sphere number on the y axis (logarithmic scale).
Fit an exponential trend-line to the data points and calculate the coefficient of determination (R²) to measure the goodness of the fit.
NOTE: The trend-line fitted to the data points should approximate an exponential curve, as expected for a cell population that grows or dies with a constant rate. R² takes values between 0 and 1, with values closest to 1 indicating a better fit.
Depict the equation of the trend-line as a natural exponential function to infer the growth rate (GR) of the culture:
y = y₀ e^(GR)x, where y₀ is the value of y when x = 0.

Representative Results

Myc overexpression in normal MECs, leads to an increased frequency of mammosphere initiating cells. This is achieved through a double mechanism: Myc increases the rate of MaSC symmetric divisions and the frequency of progenitor reprogramming into new MaSCs¹¹. To test the effect of low constitutive Myc expression, we used the Rosa26-MycER transgenic mouse model, in which Myc activity can be induced by 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT)¹⁵. We first plated the MECs on ultra-low adhesion 6-well plates to remove fibroblasts, in the absence of 4-OHT. After the first passage, we split the culture in two: two wells were kept untreated (control) and two wells were treated with 200 nM 4-OHT (MycER). We counted the sphere and cell numbers of 5 consecutive passages for three independent experiments (Table 1). The cumulative cell and sphere numbers per passage are shown on Table 2. Induction with 4-OHT leads to increased sphere and cell growth rates, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Representative results. Cumulative sphere (A) and cell (B) growth curves of control and MycER mammospheres. Mean and standard deviation of 3 independent experiments are shown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

		1st plating			2nd plating			3rd plating			4th plating			5th plating
		Cells Plated	Cell Count	Sphere Count	Cells Plated	Cell Count	Sphere Count	Cells Plated	Cell Count	Sphere Count	Cells Plated	Cell Count	Sphere Count	Cells Plated	Cell Count	Sphere Count
Exp1	Control	77,000	50,000	31	65,000	58,500	41	57,000	30,000	32	30,000	22,000	5	22,000	0	0
	Control	77,000	81,000	41	65,000	55,000	23
	MycER	77,000	31,0000	193	80,000	375,000	323	80,000	380,000	217	80,000	220,000	223	80,000	170,000	155
	MycER	77,000	110,000	142	80,000	505,000	396	80,000	270,000	149	80,000	290,000	194	80,000	250,000	160
Exp2	Control	75,000	75,000	71	60,000	17,000	34	28,000	45,000	29	45,000	13,000	2	13,000	0	0
	Control	75,000	47,000	45	60,000	11,000	47
	MycER	75,000	200,000	188	80,000	225,000	277	80,000	230,000	155	80,000	210,000	211	80,000	100,000	95
	MycER	75,000	250,000	192	80,000	202,500	283	80,000	305,000	185	80,000	160,000	237	80,000	100,000	133
Exp3	Control	82,500	130,000	121	80,000	45,000	105	80,000	110,000	86	80,000	58,500	75	58,500	58,500	78
	Control	82,500	125,000	177	80,000	71,250	42
	MycER	82,500	325,000	457	80,000	610,000	327	80,000	367,000	309	80,000	500,000	260	80,000	115,000	146
	MycER	82,500	475,000	463	80,000	455,000	392	80,000	415,000	204	80,000	470,000	295	80,000	185,000	161

Table 1: Numbers of spheres counted and numbers of cells plated and counted at each passage.

Table 2: Calculation of plated sphere numbers and cumulative sphere and cell numbers. Please click here to view a larger version of this table. (Right-click to download.)

Discussion

Here, we describe a protocol for the quantitative description of MaSC growth properties in vitro. As an example, we present the effect of low-level constitutive Myc expression on normal murine MaSCs. This approach, however, can be equally applied to various contexts. Human or murine primary cells, as well as established cell lines, can be cultured in anchorage independent conditions to establish mammosphere cultures that can be serially passaged. Gene overexpression and RNA interference can be easily introduced in the protocol with the addition of a viral transduction step at the end of the first passage (after step 3.5). Alternatively, cells can be infected in adhesion and then plated as mammospheres.

A critical aspect of the assay presented here is the seeding cell density, which should be low enough to avoid the generation of aggregates interfering with the interpretation of the results¹⁶^,¹⁷. The morphology of the mammospheres can be informative to resolve this ambiguity. Only compact, round spheres should be enumerated at the end of each passage. Both the circularity of the spheroids and the size should be taken into consideration. Using the automated process of the DIA, this step is ensured with the appropriate thresholds in an objective and absolute manner. Often, progenitors will form acinar structures or smaller clusters of cells which should be excluded from the mammosphere counts. As a rule of thumb, we use a threshold of 100 µm diameter. Finally, care should be taken to avoid the transfer of intact or non-fully dissociated mammopsheres from one passage to the next. On the other hand, excess pipetting will lead to increased cell death. Thus, if such difficulties are encountered, we recommend using mild trypsinization or Accutase treatment and passing the dissociated spheres through a 40 µm strainer to ensure the generation of single-cell suspensions.

Sphere forming efficiency (SFE) has been used alternatively, as a surrogate for SC or CSC quantitation ex vivo in mammosphere cultures. SFE is indeed a measure of stem-like cells in a given cell population. However, it represents a less conscientious approach since it provides information only at distinct time points. The calculation of cumulative sphere numbers and the generation of cumulative growth curves, instead, enables the inference of the growth rate of the culture from the initial cell seeding step until the culture exhausts or, in the case of immortalized cultures, for the desired number of passages. The assessment of growth properties allows the evaluation of the deviation from the exponential growth through the coefficient R² and, at a second step, the assessment of the GR value itself.

Importantly, cumulative mammosphere growth curves can be used to evaluate the effect of small molecule inhibitors or other chemotherapeutic drugs selectively at the CSC level⁶^,¹¹. Contrary to normal primary mammospheres, which functionally exhaust in 5-7 passages, tumor mammospheres tend to expand indefinitely. This feature is linked to the unlimited CSC self-renewal ability. The effects on proliferation and CSC self-renewal can be uncoupled through the generation of tumor cell and mammosphere growth curves, respectively. A CSC-specific effect is expected to result in a decrease in the cumulative mammosphere growth rate, with or without effect on the cumulative cell growth rate⁶^,¹¹.

Finally, another area of interest is the one of adult tissue SC reprogramming. Fully grown mammospheres consist of a phenotypically heterogeneous cell population, in which only a minor fraction retains stem-like features, including mammosphere-initiating ability and mammary gland regeneration upon transplantation in vivo⁶^,⁹^,¹¹^,¹⁸^,¹⁹. Mammary progenitors can be thus isolated either using in vitro label-retaining assays⁶^,⁹^,¹¹ or, ex vivo, using established surface markers²^,³. Notably, mammary progenitors do not survive anoikis and are unable to form mammospheres. Enforced Myc expression has been shown to confer mammosphere initiation potential to mammary progenitors isolated as PKHneg¹¹, resulting in the generation of a culture that can be passaged indefinitely. Similarly, interference of negative regulators of physiological reprogramming can be tested using the same assay. In this context, a common issue that may arise is the limited number of cell input. If the cell input is lower than 10,000 cells, we recommend seeding in 24-well plates (maximum 5,000 viable cells/mL). Nevertheless, anchorage independent culture conditions can be proven to be too harsh for scoring reprogramming, especially in cases where the reprogramming effect is not immediate. In such cases, the use of a supportive matrix and 3-dimensional organoid cultures could be more appropriate²⁰.

Overall, the mammosphere assay is a cost-effective option that can be easily employed for scoring stem-like properties in normal and tumoral MEC populations. The quantitative approach taken in this protocol facilitates the comparisons between cultures carried out in different conditions or exposed to diverse stimuli. When followed rigorously, it provides a relatively simple ex vivo model system that permits uncoupling of the multiple players that define stem properties in vivo, offering the possibility of more detailed mechanistic studies.

Divulgaciones

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Bruno Amati for the kind gift of the Rosa26-MycER transgenic mouse model. This work was funded by grants from WWCR, AIRC, ERC, and the Italian Ministry of Health to P.G.P. T.V. and X.A. were supported by FIRC and A.S. by a FUV grant.

Materials

ACK lysis buffer	Lonza	10-548E	Ammonium-chloride-potassium lysis bufer, 100 mL.
B27	Invitrogen	17504-044	B27 supplement 50X (10 mL). Final concentration 2% v/v.
bFGF	Peprotech	100-18B	Human recombinant fibroblast growth factor – basic, 50 μg. Stock solution 100 μg/μL in Tris 5 mM pH 7.6. Final dilution 0.02% v/v.
Collagenase	Sigma	C2674	Collagenase from Clostridium histolyticum. Type I-A, lyophilized powder, 1 g. Stock 20,000 U/mL in DMEM. Final dilution 1% v/v.
DMEM	Lonza	12-614F	Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
DPBS	Microgem	S17859L0615	Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline
EGF	Tebu-Bio	AF-100-15	Recombinant human epithelial growth factor. Stock solution 100 μg/mL in sterile dH₂O. Final dilution 0.02% v/v.
Glutamine	Lonza	17-605E	L-Glutamine, 200 mM. Final dilution 1% v/v.
Heparin	PharmaTex	34692032	Stock concentration 5,000 IU/mL. Final dilution 0.008% v/v.
Hyaluronidase	Sigma	H4272	Type IV-S, powder, 750-3,000 U/mg solid, 30 mg. Stock solution 10 mg/mL in sterile dH₂O. Final dilution 1% v/v.
Hydrocortisone	Sigma	H0888	Stock concentration 100 μg/mL. Final dilution 0.5% v/v.
Insulin	SAFCBiosciences	91077C	Insulin, human recombinant, dry powder, 250 mg. Stock concentration 1 mg/mL. Final dilution 0.5% v/v.
Low attachment 6-well plates	Corning	351146	Sterile 6-well not treated cell culture plates with clear flat bottom and lid.
MEBM	Lonza	CC-3151	Mammary epithelial cell growth basal medium
Penicllin-Streptomycin mixture	Lonza	17-602F	Contains 10,000 U potassium penicillin and 10,000 µg streptomycin sulfate per mL in 0.85% saline. Final dilution 1% v/v.
Poly-HEMA	Sigma	P3932	Dissolve in 95% EtOH overnight at 55 °C. Stock concentration 12% w/v. Final dilution 1% v/v in 95% EtOH. Filter (0.22 μm) before use.

Referencias

Kordon, E. C., Smith, G. H. An entire functional mammary gland may comprise the progeny from a single cell. Development. 125 (10), 1921-1930 (1998).
Shackleton, M., et al. Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Nature. 439 (7072), 84-88 (2006).
Stingl, J., et al. Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature. 439 (7079), 993-997 (2006).
van Amerongen, R., Bowman, A. N., Nusse, R. Developmental stage and time dictate the fate of Wnt/beta-catenin-responsive stem cells in the mammary gland. Cell Stem Cell. 11 (3), 387-400 (2012).
Van Keymeulen, A., et al. Distinct stem cells contribute to mammary gland development and maintenance. Nature. 479 (7372), 189-193 (2011).
Cicalese, A., et al. The tumor suppressor p53 regulates polarity of self-renewing divisions in mammary stem cells. Cell. 138 (6), 1083-1095 (2009).
Dontu, G., et al. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes & Development. 17 (10), 1253-1270 (2003).
Grimshaw, M. J., et al. Mammosphere culture of metastatic breast cancer cells enriches for tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Research. 10 (3), R52 (2008).
Pece, S., et al. Biological and molecular heterogeneity of breast cancers correlates with their cancer stem cell content. Cell. 140 (1), 62-73 (2010).
Ponti, D., et al. Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Investigación sobre el cáncer. 65 (13), 5506-5511 (2005).
Santoro, A., et al. p53 Loss in Breast Cancer Leads to Myc Activation, Increased Cell Plasticity, and Expression of a Mitotic Signature with Prognostic Value. Cell Reports. 26 (3), 624-638 (2019).
Reynolds, B. A., Weiss, S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science. 255 (5052), 1707-1710 (1992).
Gao, H., et al. Murine mammary stem/progenitor cell isolation: Different method matters?. Springerplus. 5, 140 (2016).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods. 9 (7), 671-675 (2012).
Murphy, D. J., et al. Distinct thresholds govern Myc’s biological output in vivo. Cancer Cell. 14 (6), 447-457 (2008).
Bailey, P. C., et al. Single-Cell Tracking of Breast Cancer Cells Enables Prediction of Sphere Formation from Early Cell Divisions. iScience. 8, 29-39 (2018).
Lombardo, Y., de Giorgio, A., Coombes, C. R., Stebbing, J., Castellano, L. Mammosphere formation assay from human breast cancer tissues and cell lines. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (97), (2015).
Peng, T., Qinghua, M., Zhenning, T., Kaifa, W., Jun, J. Long-term sphere culture cannot maintain a high ratio of cancer stem cells: a mathematical model and experiment. PLoS One. 6 (11), (2011).
Smart, C. E., et al. In vitro analysis of breast cancer cell line tumourspheres and primary human breast epithelia mammospheres demonstrates inter- and intrasphere heterogeneity. PLoS One. 8 (6), (2013).
Panciera, T., et al. De Novo Generation of Somatic Stem Cells by YAP/TAZ. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (135), (2018).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Citar este artículo

Vlachou, T., Aobuli, X., D’Elia, E., Santoro, A., Moroni, M. C., Pelicci, P. G. Quantification of Self-renewal in Murine Mammosphere Cultures. J. Vis. Exp. (153), e60256, doi:10.3791/60256 (2019).