A detailed protocol for an experimental paradigm to assess the effectiveness with which children regulate emotion is described. Children are randomly assigned to use specific emotion regulation strategies, negative emotions are elicited with film clips, and changes in subsequent psychophysiology index the extent to which emotion regulation is effective.
Effective regulation of emotion is one of the most important skills that develops in childhood. Research interest in this area is expanding, but empirical work has been limited by predominantly correlational investigations of children’s skills. Relatedly, a key conceptual challenge for emotion scientists is to distinguish between emotion responding and emotion regulatory processes. This paper presents a novel method to address these conceptual and methodological issues in child samples. An experimental paradigm that assesses the effectiveness with which children regulate emotion is described. Children are randomly assigned to use specific emotion regulation strategies, negative emotions are elicited with film clips, and changes in subsequent psychophysiology index the extent to which emotion regulation is effective. Children are instructed to simply watch the emotion-eliciting film (control), distract themselves from negative emotions (cognitive distraction), or reframe the situation in a way that downplays the importance of the emotional event (cognitive reappraisal). Cardiac physiology, continuously acquired before and during the emotional task, serves as an objective measure of children’s unfolding emotional responding while viewing evocative films. Key comparisons in patterns of obtained physiological reactivity are between the control and emotion regulation strategy conditions. Representative results from this approach are described, and discussion focuses on the contribution of this methodological approach to developmental science.
Children experience negative emotions like sadness and fear every day. As they develop and mature, children learn regulatory strategies that allow them to manage a broad range of stressors and challenges to adapt to the world. Their emotion regulation repertoire expands, and shifts in composition from primarily behavioral strategies to include more cognitive strategies1. By the end of middle childhood, children regulate their emotions using both cognitive and behavioral strategies2. Understanding the effective regulation or management of unwanted negative feelings has become increasingly interesting to developmental scientists in recent years. This interest is driven, in part, by research linking emotion regulation processes to a host of social, emotional, and cognitive outcomes with substantial consequences for children's daily lives (e.g., academic achievement3, friendships4, and psychopathology5).
The method described here focuses on two cognitive emotion regulation strategies that have received the lion's share of empirical attention to date: reappraisal and distraction. Studies done with adults have shown that reappraisal and distraction are effective methods for alleviating emotion6,7,8,9,10,11. Reappraisal, which involves changing or reframing how one interprets an emotion or problem, has been shown to be effective in reducing the intensity of negative emotions in school-aged children12,13. Distraction, in contrast, involves changing what one is thinking about, such as when a child about to receive a vaccine thinks instead of the ice cream they will enjoy with their parent afterwards. Children can also begin to use these cognitive strategies to regulate negative emotions effectively, from as young as 5 – 6 years of age14.
The Theoretical and Practical Challenges of Studying Emotion Regulation
Emotional reactivity and regulatory processes are intertwined, bidirectional, and iterative15,16. Thus, a key conceptual challenge for developmental scientists is to identify and employ methods that meaningfully distinguish between emotion responding and regulatory processes. The approach described here takes the view of emotions as regulated (in contrast to emotions as regulating)15. Emotion regulation is defined as the process of changing an experienced emotion17 in ways that alter the intensity, duration, and/or valence of the emotion18.
Despite promising behavioral evidence that cognitive emotion regulation strategies like distraction and reappraisal reduce negative emotions14, there are many limitations to the predominant self-report or observational methodologies that constrain the conclusions that can be drawn from existing empirical studies, especially with young children. For example, self-report of emotional experience is subject to inaccuracies and demand characteristics. Although behavioral observation (e.g., of facial expressions) to index emotional responding is ostensibly more objective than self-report, observation is still subject to automatic and explicit regulatory processes that mask or hide the true experience of distress or negative emotion. To address these conceptual and methodological issues, this paper describes a method of examining the effects of emotion regulation strategies on children's subsequent psychophysiology that allows researchers to more clearly distinguish between reactivity to and active regulation of negative emotions. This experimental paradigm for eliciting negative emotions and assessing the consequences of different instructed emotion regulation strategies provides an approach that can be used with children of a wide range of ages, adolescents, or adults.
Psychophysiology Is a Non-Invasive Index of Emotion Regulation
Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA) is a commonly used index of parasympathetic cardiac psychophysiology, and has emerged as a key correlate of children's emotion regulatory ability19,20. RSA is derived from the measurement of heart rate variation (controlled by efferent fibers of the vagus nerve) within the respiratory cycle21,22. High baseline RSA indicates better emotional regulation and socio-emotional competencies21, whereas lower baseline RSA is linked to negative socio-emotional outcomes23. Baseline RSA reflects the system's regulatory capacity to respond to stress, whereas changes in RSA from baseline levels under conditions of challenge (RSA reactivity) enable greater sympathetic influence and resource mobilization. This process reflects a shift away from homeostatic demands to the facilitation of sustained attention, behavioral self-regulation, and the generation of coping strategies to control affective or behavioral arousal20,26. RSA reactivity to challenging lab tasks is associated with better emotion regulatory abilities and general adaptive functioning, including less negative emotionality and risk for behavior problems and better sustained attention21,23,24,25,26,27. RSA reactivity to challenge can be described as increasing (RSA augmentation) or decreasing (RSA suppression) parasympathetic influence. The flexibility with which parasympathetic influence over the heart is regulated across contexts is thought to underlie adaptive emotion regulation.
Indeed, changes in children's RSA amplitudes during a series of challenging tasks predict their emotional regulatory skill28. RSA is responsive in emotionally challenging contexts as well. For example, RSA suppression (a decrease from baseline level to task level) is linked to experiencing fear and sadness, but augmentation (increase from baseline to task) is linked to effective regulation of emotion when sadness and fear are evoked via film clips29,30. Previous work that has capitalized on the utility of this non-invasive method for assessing in vivo emotion regulation processes has demonstrated how children's use of specific cognitive emotion regulation strategies predicted RSA reactivity while they were watching emotion-eliciting videos31. This paper describes a novel experimental paradigm that uses the physiological patterns associated with active emotion regulation to index regulatory ability, providing an innovative method to parse the experience and regulation of negative emotions.
NOTE: The university's institutional review board approved all procedures before recruitment or data collection with human subjects began. Parents provide informed consent for children's participation, and children provide verbal (or, verbal and written if older than 7 years) assent to participate in these activities.
1. Randomly Assign Participants to Experimental Conditions
2. Establish Rapport with Child Participants
3. Train Children to Self-report Their Emotions
Figure 1. Emotion Rating Scale. This scale displays the picture scales that the researcher shows the children throughout the experiment to collect in-the-moment ratings of how sad, scared, and happy they are. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Acquire a Baseline Report of Children's Emotions
5. Acquire Cardiac Psychophysiology Data
6. Provide Children with Emotion Regulation Instructions
7. Elicit Negative Emotion
8. Alleviate Intense or Lingering Negative Emotions
9. Process and Code Physiology Data
10. Calculate RSA Reactivity Scores
11. Data Analysis
As shown in Figures 2 and 3, a typical result is that instructing children to use cognitive emotion regulation strategies leads to a different pattern of RSA reactivity than simply viewing the emotional film (Control). This supports the idea that instructions to regulate negative emotion using distraction or reappraisal give rise to different patterns of physiological responding during an emotionally challenging task, given the difference in responding among children in the Control condition and the strategy conditions.
Different methods for quantifying RSA reactivity have distinct implications for the interpretation of the results. Figure 2 presents RSA reactivity, computed as a difference score, as the dependent variable. This calculation provides information about the direction (i.e. a positive or negative change in RSA from baseline levels) and magnitude of the change. Positive difference scores indicate RSA augmentation and enhanced parasympathetic influence. In contrast, Figure 3 depicts results of the same analysis with a different computation of RSA reactivity (standardized residuals) used as the dependent variable. These residualized change scores account for the initial level (baseline) of each participant, and quantify the extent to which RSA reactivity is greater than (positive change scores) or less than (negative change scores) the average change for the entire sample. Because reactivity with this second computation is relative to the sample average, interpretation must avoid describing reactivity in absolute terms. Instead, Figure 3 suggests that children in the Reappraisal condition showed RSA reactivity comparable to the sample average (M = 0), children in the Distraction condition showed relatively less RSA augmentation than average, and the reactivity of children in the Control condition was greater than average for the sad film, but average for the scary film. Thus, researchers should select the desired statistical approach to quantifying RSA reactivity data that allows for a generalizable (Figure 2) or sample-specific (Figure 3) interpretation.
Figure 2. RSA Reactivity to the Sad and Scary Films (Calculated as a Difference Score) by Emotion Regulation Condition. This bar graph displays children's RSA reactivity to the sad and scary films in each of the three between-subject instruction conditions (Control, Distraction, Reappraisal). Error bars represent standard error. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. RSA Reactivity to the Sad and Scary Films (Calculated as Residualized Change Scores) by Emotion Regulation Condition. This bar graph displays children's RSA reactivity to the sad and scary films in each of the three between-subject instruction conditions (Control, Distraction, Reappraisal) using the same dataset as Figure 2. Error bars represent standard error. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Critical Steps within the Protocol
Effectively eliciting negative emotion and instructing children to use specific emotion regulation strategies are the critical steps within the protocol.
Modifications and Troubleshooting
Film clips must be selected (and pilot tested) to be age-appropriate given the age range in question to ensure they evoke the target emotions of interest for the specified age ranges. Researchers should also take care to make sure that children understand the emotion regulation instructions. After providing regulatory instructions, researchers should ask children what they will do if they start to feel the target negative emotion (e.g., sad, scared) and ensure that children can repeat the instructions before the film task begins.
Limitations of the Technique
Limitations to this technique include the generalizability of physiological regulation from a brief lab-based evocation to real world contexts. For example, film clips are brief in duration and the negative emotions they evoke are often short-lived. People's emotional engagement during a brief clip may be very different from their engagement in real world events, and as such, individual motivation to engage in regulatory strategies and their subsequent performance on lab-based versus real-world emotional challenges may vary widely as well. To the extent that the cognitive emotion regulation strategies examined here impose cognitive load, they could influence RSA differently than other emotion regulation strategies. In addition, alternative baseline tasks and conditions (e.g., watching a neutral film) should be considered in conjunction with the goals of the researcher. Future work should combine physiological assessments of emotion regulation with experiential and behavioral assessments to gain a more comprehensive picture of effective regulation.
Significance of the Technique with Respect to Existing/Alternative Methods
Given the difficulty in separating the experience of emotion from active regulatory attempts, this approach answers the call for techniques that parse reactive and regulatory processes to provide conceptual and methodological clarity15. The experimental paradigm demonstrates that engagement in purposeful, active emotion regulation can be quantified by examination of RSA reactivity, and separated from the experience of negative emotions. Findings from this paradigm represent a first step towards understanding how emotion regulation strategies relate to changes in children's emotional responding. This is noteworthy because this work focuses on strategies that are cognitive (such as distraction and reappraisal), making them harder to assess through traditional approaches to examining children's emotional responding in the laboratory (e.g., observations, self-report, parent report). The advantage of this approach is particularly evident early in development when children are less able to articulate or explain their regulatory choices. This psychophysiological method of assessing emotion regulation in children gives the opportunity to acquire information about children's active regulatory processes as they unfold that cannot be acquired through observations and self-reports.
Future Applications or Directions after Mastering the Technique
The use of film clips to elicit negative emotions has multiple benefits. Not only does this approach allow for greater levels of experimental control and minimize movement artifacts by having children sit during the tasks, but may also minimize measurement invariance issues, given that films have successfully been used to evoke discrete emotions in child participants across a wide range of ages12,31. Future research can take advantage of this type of paradigm to examine how individual differences (e.g., pre-existing emotional regulatory skill, cognitive functioning, exposure to trauma, personality) can influence people's physiological reactivity in emotional contexts. Such an approach would shed light on the important psychological questions of which individuals, or under which conditions an individual may benefit more or less from specific emotion regulation strategies.
In sum, this novel lab-based paradigm advances understanding of the interrelation of emotional reactivity and regulation, by providing a controlled technique for eliciting negative emotions and measuring subsequent physiological responding that corresponds to the use of different emotion regulation strategies.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank the children and families who have participated in our studies and the research assistants of the Emotion Regulation Lab for their assistance with data collection and coding.
MindWare BioNex 2SLT Chassis Assembly | Mindware Technologies | 50-3711-02 | Hardware to acquire cardiac physiology |
Mindware Ambulatory Impedance Cardiograph. | Mindware Technologies | 50-1000-RB | Mobile acquisition device |
MindWare Disposable Pediatric Tape Electrodes | Mindware Technologies | 93-0101-00 | EKG electrodes for children |
MindWare HR/HRV Application w/Key | Mindware Technologies | 60-1100-00 | Scoring software to process EKG |