Science Education
>

Polarization-Sensitive Two-Photon Microscopy for a Label-Free Amyloid Structural Characterization

LEHRERVORBEREITUNG
KONZEPTE
SCHÜLERPROTOKOLL
JoVE Journal
Chemie
Author Produced
Zum Anzeigen dieser Inhalte ist ein JoVE-Abonnement erforderlich.  Melden Sie sich an oder starten Sie Ihre kostenlose Testversion.
JoVE Journal Chemie
Polarization-Sensitive Two-Photon Microscopy for a Label-Free Amyloid Structural Characterization

1. Preparing the microscope slides with fully-grown spherulites

NOTE: See the Table of Materials for details about all materials, reagents, and equipment used in this protocol. All solutions were prepared with deionized water (18.2 MΩ·cm at 25 °C) obtained from the water purification system.

  1. Incubate the amyloid spherulites based on the protocol described by Krebs et al16. with some modifications, as described below.
    1. Weigh 10 mg of insulin powder in a 1.5 mL tube.
    2. Dissolve the powder with a 1 mL aliquot of the deionized H2O/HCl solution (pH 1.5).
    3. Seal the sample with the tape and put it in a thermal mixer to incubate for 24 h at 70 °C (0 rpm).
      NOTE: To perform imaging of amyloids in their native (i.e., hydrated) environment and prevent sample deformation due to dehydration, it is necessary to prepare microscope slides according to the following description (scheme shown in Figure 2).
  2. Wash the microscope glass slide thoroughly with water.
  3. Dip the slides in methanol and leave them to dry under ambient conditions on a dust-free wipe.
  4. Take a 100 µL aliquot of the spherulite solution from the tube with an automatic pipette (step 1.1.2) and add it to the well located in the central area of the microscope slide.
  5. Cover the solution with a coverslip, avoiding air bubble formation.
  6. Deposit mountant along the edges of the coverslip on the slide with an automatic pipette to seal the spherulites' native solution.
    NOTE: It is of great importance to deposit slide mountant on both the coverslip as well as slide surfaces. Do this under the fuming hood because of the toxicity of the volatile solvent (xylene). See the inset in Figure 2.
  7. Leave the microscope sample under ambient conditions for the mountant to harden.
    NOTE: The hardening process is temperature- and humidity-dependent but should be completed within 12 h.
  8. Check if insulin spherulites were formed correctly using a polarized optical microscope (POM) with crossed polarizers. Scan through the sample looking for a characteristic pattern of bright areas, called a Maltese cross, as shown in Figure 3.
    NOTE: The amyloid spherulites can be defined as spherical superstructures characterized by a heterogeneous morphology with a core-shell structure. In detail, they are composed of an amorphous core and radially growing amyloid fibrils16. Due to the anisotropic character of spherulite structures, they can distinctively interact with polarized light (e.g., by refraction) and alter their phase, which can be easily observed under POM with crossed polarizers. This method was used to study only fully developed spherulites characterized by a model-like Maltase cross pattern. Consequently, aggregates or structurally distorted spherulites were excluded from further investigations.

2. Building and aligning the system

NOTE: A schematic representation of a polarization-sensitive two-photon microscope can be found in Figure 1.

  1. Install a femtosecond laser with the output wavelength tunability in the 690-1,080 nm range, for example, operating on a mode-locked Ti: Sapphire laser with ~100 fs pulses of 80 MHz repetition rate.
  2. Add a half-wave plate mounted on a rotation stage to the excitation path of the setup to control the polarization of the incident light in the XY microscope sample plane.
  3. Install the dichroic mirror to cut off the excitation beam from the detecting optics.
    NOTE: The optical characteristics of a dichroic mirror should allow to reflect the excitation beam (to the specimen) in the NIR range of wavelengths and be simultaneously transparent for the wavelength range corresponding to emission from the samples.
  4. Install a piezoelectric scanning stage for raster scans within the XY plane for a chosen Z.
  5. Mount the high NA immersion objective, for example, an apochromatic oil immersion objective 100x/1.4 NA.
    NOTE: As the entire setup operates in an epi-fluorescence mode, the incident and emitted signals are passing by the same objective.
  6. In the emission path, add a polarizing beam-splitter that splits two-photon excited emission into two orthogonally polarized components (IX and IY)
  7. Install two photon-counting avalanche photodiodes (APDs) in a configuration allowing them to collect light transferred and reflected using the beam-splitter, respectively (Figure 1).
  8. Mount correct wavelength-dependent cut-off filters on the excitation and emission path of the system, for example, an 800 nm long-pass filter directly in the excitation optical path and a 700 short-pass filter in the emission path.
    NOTE: Analyze the emission spectra from spherulite so that any potential contribution from second harmonic generation (SHG) or laser light could be excluded using the correct emission filters. It is also worth noting that this system should also allow measurements of polarization-sensitive SHG, which could be used to resolve the ordering of biomolecules within the samples. However, the data analysis of the SHG signal differs from fluorescence, which, in more detail, was described by Aït-Belkacem et al.17.
  9. Align the whole system (using the alignment mode built in many lasers) until similar signal intensities are collected using both photodiodes.
  10. Check if the excitation beam focused by the high NA objective and imaged on a camera has a concentric circular shape as presented in Figure 4A.
  11. Adjust the scan time and corresponding power to minimalize the damage induced by the incident laser on the sample. Exemplary point-like burning is presented in Figure 4B. Measure the nominal power using a digital handheld power meter connected to a photodiode power sensor located at the entrance to the body of the microscope.
    NOTE: Biological specimens can be easily burned due to laser illumination. In this case, the 100 -900 µW power range (at the focal point of the objective lens) was found to be an excellent trade-off between sample stability and intense emission.
  12. Before the sample measurement, test the quality of alignment of optics with an isotropic reference sample (e.g., fluorescein embodied in the amorphous polymer). To perform the calibration check, follow the procedure described in section 3 using an isotropic reference instead of an amyloid sample.
    NOTE: With an assumption that the microscopy setup is ideally adjusted for the sample with isotropic properties, both 2P emission components (IX and IY) detected with two APDs should be characterized by the same intensity (Figure 4C).

3. Measurement of the bovine insulin spherulites

NOTE: To perform all the described ps-2PF measurements, hand-written software was used, which controls the positions of the piezoelectric stage and half-waveplate and collects the signal from both photodiodes, allowing for plotting of the XY scans (raster scans) from selected areas on microscope slides as well as polar graphs from specific sample coordinates. Additional notes have also been added to the protocol, which will allow users to perform the measurement without it, since both the piezo-stage and rotation stage used to rotate the half-wave plate could be controlled using their own controllers or corresponding software. Still, it is strongly recommended to write an algorithm combining the rotation angle of a half-wave plate with 2PEF intensity collected with both photodiodes since this correlation (polar graphs) is crucial for proper data analysis resulting in structural information.

  1. Mount the specimen with the spherulites on the piezoelectric stage (immobilize the glass slide with tape). Be sure to mount it in a way where a thin glass side (coverslip) is facing the objective as high numerical objectives are characterized by relatively short working distances.
    NOTE: As oil immersion is used, a small drop of mineral oil should be applied to the objective before specimen mounting and focusing.
  2. By changing XY and Z positions using microscope knobs, focus the objective on one of the spherulites found in the solution, but be aware that because spherulite diameters are typically in the range of tens of µm, focus within the central area of the entire structure. Look for black and white haloes around the specific spherulite as signs of under- and upper-focus, respectively. Adjust the "Z" axis to be between these extremes.
    NOTE: It is important to find an isolated sample without structural defects. Extremely small spherulites may drift off due to the material stress introduced by the objective while the biggest structures are probably aggregated or highly distorted.
  3. Center the spherulite in the field of view of the observed microscopic plane and determine the size of XY scan by looking at how many piezostage steps in X and Y directions (displayed on the piezostage controller or in its software) are needed to cover the area of the whole structure.
    NOTE: It is recommended to set the system in such a way that the beginning of the XY scan is located near one of the corners of the spherulite and coincides with the zero position of the stage (X and Y = 0)
  4. Adjust the following scanning parameters:
    1. Adjust the polarization of the excitation beam, and rotate the half-wave plate to obtain the polarization corresponding to the "X" and "Y" axes of the microscope sample plane.
      NOTE: This can be done by measuring the polar graphs of isotropic fluorescent medium such as fluorescein. For such materials, maximum fluorescence intensity is parallel to the excitation beam polarization; thus, rotating the half-wave plate adjusts the polarization with X and Y axis on the observation plane, also denoted as X and Y axis on polar graphs as in Figure 4C. Full polar graphs could be measured by collecting the measured 2PEF intensity on both photodiodes for 180° rotation of half-wave plate (360° rotation of excitation light polarization) and correlating the intensity with the excitation light polarization angle. It could be done manually, by measuring the emission intensity for every half-wave plate angle separately and then assembling it into a polar graph in data analysis software or automatically, using dedicated or self-written software.
    2. Adjust the piezostage parameters: scanning speed, step, and range to cover the area of the whole spherulite.
      NOTE: The scanning range must be higher than the spherulite diameter to fully frame the entire superstructure within the raster scan. Low scanning speed and step allow users to obtain high-quality images; however, this may result in sample burning. Therefore, a trade-off dependent on the spherulite size is necessary. These parameters cannot be universally applied. Exemplary parameters used in Figure 5A: scanning range 45 x 45 µm, scanning step 1 µm, and scanning speed 2 µm/s.
  5. Open the shutter, turn on the photodiodes, and collect Equation 1 and Equation 2 2P emission components for every single step of the selected scanning area-for the excitation beam polarized correspondingly to the X and then, the Y axes. Exemplary two-photon excited autofluorescence (2PAF) raster scans of insulin spherulites are presented in Figure 5A.
    NOTE: Measuring raster scans requires correlating piezo stage coordinates with Equation 1 and Equation 2 collected emission components, which could be done manually, by measuring the intensity in every single point of the selected area and then assembling it into a 2D matrix, or automatically, via self-written software. Raster scans can be presented as a summation of Equation 1 and Equation 2 emission components' intensity or distinctively for a specific emission component. As they are highly structure-dependent, structural distortions within spherulites are easily visible. However, due to the movement of the microscope stage, some samples may drift off from the field of view. Therefore, images need to be screened for artifacts. It is necessary to check the position of the spherulite before and after the scan.
  6. To perform full polarization analysis from the specific spot on the sample, turn off the excitation beam.
  7. Subsequently, pick specific coordinates of piezostage corresponding to the chosen location on the spherulite where the information about the orientation of molecules is required with the sub-µm resolution.
  8. Adjust the piezoelectric stage to center the field of view at indicated (X, Y).
  9. Turn on the excitation beam and perform full (360°) polarization analysis of Equation 1 and Equation 2 emission by turning on the rotation of the half-wave plate (180° rotation). Present 2PF Ix and Iy components in the form of a polar graph (as shown in Figure 5B).
    ​NOTE: This step can be repeated in different locations in the sample to collect a sufficient amount of data.

4. Determination of local fibril ordering inside the bovine insulin spherulites

NOTE: All numerical calculations connected to the data analysis were done using the Python programming language and based on the functions available in libraries NumPy and SciPy. Plotting the data requires the Matplotlib library. All calculations are based on formulas presented in supporting information in one of the papers by Obstarczyk et al.6.

  1. Simulating the intensity of two-photon fluorescence excited for the specified distribution of molecules with a selected direction of the incident light polarization (denoted by α)
    NOTE: The presented formulas are based on the assumption of parallel absorption and emission dipole moments of a fluorophore. For a discussion of other cases (e.g., different directions of the absorption and emission dipole moments, energy transfer between the fluorophores), see the paper by Le Floc'h et al8.
    1. Find the parameters accounting for the variation of the electric field by polarization mixing and depolarization effects caused by the dichroic mirror mounted in a setup:
      1. γ represents the amplitude factor between the reflectivity of Equation 3 and Equation 4 polarized light from a dichroic mirror.
      2. δ represents the phase shift (ellipticity) between Equation 3 and Equation 4 polarized light.
        NOTE: Correctly defining these two parameters is crucial for successful structural characterization because of their strong influence on the shape of measured polar graphs11,18. In the case of the presented system, both parameters were determined during ellipsometry measurements of a dichroic mirror applied in a system.
    2. Calculate the incident electric field vectors propagating in the X and Y axesof every angle measured during the ps-TPFM measurement using equations (1-5).
      Equation 5 (1)
      Equation 6 (2)
      Equation 7 (3)
      Equation 8 (4)
      Equation 9 (5)
      NOTE If the intensity is measured over the whole 360° with step 1°, calculate electric field vectors for all 360°. All angles should be in radians. ρ parameter is connected to optical frequency ω of the simulated electric field (ρ=ω·t) and used integrated from 0 to 2π during the calculations of the incident electric field vectors propagating in X and Y axis for every angle α measured during the ps-TPFM measurement.
    3. Define the functions for transition dipole moments in directions of three axes of a cartesian system according to equations (6-8):
      Equation 10 (6)
      Equation 11 (7)
      Equation 12 (8)
      NOTE: φ is the orientation angle of the amyloid fibril long axis in the XY sample frame. θ and ϕ angles are the polar and azimuthal angles used to define the transition dipole moment orientation of a fluorophore. 
    4. Use the functions defined in step 4.1.3. to define functions for Jx (Φ,θ,ϕ) and JY (Φ,θ,ϕ), which account for the contribution of tight light focusing with high numerical aperture objective to the fluorescence polarization detection in X and Y direction using equations (9, 10). 
      Equation 13 (9)
      Equation 14 (10)
      NOTE: K1, K2, K3 factors are related to the microscope objective used during the ps-TPFM measurement. In these experiments, an apochromatic oil immersion objective 100x/1.4 NA was used and K1, K2, K3 factors were 2.945, 0.069, and 1.016, respectively.
    5. Define a function for f(Ω), which is a molecular angular distribution, depending on the half aperture of a fluorophore cone Ψ, with a variable thickness ΔΨ; use equation (11). The graphical representation of all three angles concerning amyloid fibril is presented in Figure 6.
      Equation 15  (11)
      NOTE: Be careful while writing the exponent-the power of 2 works on the function argument, not the whole function!
    6. Define all fWWIJKL factors as shown in equations (12-21).
      Equation 16 (12)
      Equation 17 (13)
      Equation 18 (14)
      Equation 19 (15)
      Equation 20 (16)
      Equation 21 (17)
      Equation 22 (18)
      Equation 23 (19)
      Equation 24 (20)
      Equation 25 (21)
    7. Calculate two-photon excited fluorescence intensities Equation 26 and Equation 27 for every measured angle (similarly as in point 4.1.2) using equations (22, 23).
      Equation 28 = Equation 29 (22)
      Equation 30 = Equation 31 (23)
    8. Check if the simulation is working correctly using the following variable values (placed in the legend to Figure 7) and compare the obtained results with Figure 7A-C.
      NOTE: All degrees should be written in radians.
  2. Fit the simulated intensities into the intensity of two-photon-excited autofluorescence of bovine insulin spherulites collected during ps-2PFM measurements.
    NOTE: Resolving the spherulite structure based on ps-2PFM measurements requires using the equations written in the protocol to simulate the theoretical intensity of two-photon excited fluorescence and fitting all the parameters connected to the ordering of molecular fluorophore. It requires multiple iterations over the various values of Φ, an angle describing the rotation of the fibril in the XY microscope sample, and ΔΨ, aberrations of the conical distribution of the emission dipole Ψ due to the molecular rotations in filaments for fixed Ψ until reaching the highest possible R2 coefficient between normalized two-photon excited fluorescence signal intensity collected during measurement and normalized intensities simulated according to step 4.1 of the protocol.
    1. Determine the Ψ half-angle.
      NOTE: For bovine insulin spherulites, it should be equal to Ψ = 29°6.
    2. Fitting workflow:
      1. Choose the value of Φ from 0° to 180° (in Figure 8A and 8B Φ = 16° and 127°, respectively).
      2. Choose the value of ΔΨ from 0° to 90° (in Figure 8A,B, ΔΨ = 24° and 1°, respectively).
      3. Calculate Equation 28 (equation 22) and Equation 30(equation 23) for the whole measured range of θ angles using the chosen values of Φ and ΔΨ.
      4. Compare the intensities calculated during simulations (both normalized to the maximum value of
      5. Calculate Equation 28) with normalized intensities of
      6. Calculate Equation 1 and Equation 2 (both normalized to the maximum value of Equation 1) measured during ps-2PFM measurement.
        NOTE: In the presented experiments, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated using the “corrcoef” function from the NumPy Python library.
    3. In the end, choose the values of Φ and ΔΨ leading to the highest correlation coefficients and convergence between the simulated intensities and measured signal similar to what is shown in Figure 8.

Polarization-Sensitive Two-Photon Microscopy for a Label-Free Amyloid Structural Characterization

Learning Objectives

The presented protocol provides step-by-step guidance through the preparation of amyloid superstructures for testing with ps-2PFM, construction of the microscopic system, and measurements of the proper sample. However, before the final set of measurements, it is vital to properly align the APDs with an isotropic reference, which should result in collecting a symmetrical signal of similar shape and intensity on both detectors (Figure 4C). Even minimal differences between the intensities measured on the detectors in X and Y axes should be taken into account in further measurements and especially, during the analysis as an appropriate correction factor. After mounting, the sample containing single spherulites, giving a characteristic Maltese cross on the POM as in Figure 2B, and after performing a 2PFM raster scan, the image should look similar to what is shown in Figure 5A, which is consistent with reported 2PFM raster scans of spherulites6,7 and different organized biomolecules11,12. One may observe some changes in the location of the axis with the highest brightness, which is related to the fact that fluorescence signal intensity strongly depends on the polarization of the excitation beam. Therefore, it is necessary to verify which position of the half-waveplate corresponds to the excitation of the sample along the X (Figure 5A, top) and Y (Figure 5A, bottom) axes. It is also worth noting how polar graphs change while performing a full polarization analysis from different selected spots. Outside the spherulite, the polar graph looks like a collection of artifacts and random signal noise spikes (Figure 5B, I). Such a graph may also indicate the drift of the spherulite between measurements and require finding new coordinates of the entire structure by another 2PF raster scan. Properly measured polar graphs from highly ordered locations of insulin spherulite along the X and Y axes are shown in Figure 5B II and III, respectively. They can have different shapes and geometries, depending on the local orientation and organization of fluorophores measured from the selected spot7.

The last step of the protocol is focused on the analysis of the obtained data using an algorithm based on a mathematical model combining the orientation of amyloid fibers in the XY plane Φ, the associated fluorophore transient dipole moments Ψ, and their aberrations ΔΨ (Figure 6) with intensity Equation 1 and Equation 2 of two-photon induced fluorescence. Correctly implemented functions presented in the protocol should, after entering the appropriate input data (protocol step 4.9), produce identical polar graphs as those presented in Figure 7. Any deviations-different data orientation, intensities, or shapes of simulated Equation 26 and Equation 32-indicate errors in the code. If the model works, one can proceed to the last step of the protocol-fitting the simulated data to real data obtained from the ps-2PFM measurement. Chosen values of Φ and ΔΨ with the highest correlation coefficients and convergence between the simulated intensities and measured signal should lead to similar images as shown in Figure 8. There should be the best possible fit of Equation 26 and Equation 32 functions to the overall orientation and shape of Equation 1 and Equation 2 and the values of Φ and ΔΨ should correspond to the local orientation of fibrils and fluorophores in the measured spot on spherulite. Similar models and fitting methods could also be used for the determination of the local organization of other biomolecules like DNA11.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Two-photon polarization-sensitive microscopy setup. Scheme showing the two-photon microscope setup used for the polarization-sensitive two-photon excited fluorescence measurements of bovine insulin spherulites. Two-photon excited emission horizontally and vertically polarized (to microscope sample plane) components are depicted with IX, and IY, respectively. Abbreviations: SP = sample plane; O = objective; DM = dichroic mirror; λ/2 = half-wave plate; LPF = long-pass filter; BE = beam expander; P = Glan polarizer; Ti: Sa = Titan: sapphire laser light source; M = Mirror; SPF = short pass filter; PBS = polarization beam splitter; L = optical lens; APD = avalanche photodiode. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Scheme showing the slide preparation/photo. (A) Scheme showing the sealed sample preparation; (B) photographs of the subsequent steps for the sample sealing. I: a 100 µL aliquot of the spherulite solution on the microscopy slide with a well, II: coverslip dropped on top of the solution; III: tight seal formed from deposited polymer (mountant). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Quality control of the insulin spherulites under a polarized-light microscope. (A1,B1) Brightfield mode as well as under (A2,B2) crossed polarizers. Characteristic Maltese cross pattern can be observed on the corresponding images taken with crossed polarizers. (A) Spherulites aggregates with structural distortions, (B) high-quality isolated spherulite. Scale bars = 5 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Testing the alignment of the ps-2PFM system. (A) Concentric defocused image of the fluorescein fluorescence as seen without (A1) and with (A2) dichroic mirror, (B) photodamaged spherulite with burned holes arising due to the elongated polarization analysis in selected points along x and y directions, (C) two-photon excited emission components in dependence on incident light polarization angle as registered for an isotropic sample (fluorescein solution). and denote emission components measured by avalanche photodiodes measuring the X and Y emission polarization axis, respectively. Scale bars = 5 µm (A1,A2), 10 µm (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Exemplary 2PFM raster scans and polar graphs from label-free insulin spherulite. (A) 2PF intensity raster scans of label-free insulin spherulites: polarization of excitation light: (A1) horizontal polarization, (A2) vertical polarization, and emission are denoted with white arrows, and the inset shows the same spherulite imaged under a standard polarized light microscope with crossed polarizers. (B) Polar graphs derived from three spots denoted on the A1 scan (B1, I; B2, II; B3, III). Ix and Iy denote emission components measured by avalanche photodiodes measuring the X and Y emission polarization axis, respectively. Abbreviation: 2PF = two-photon fluorescence. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Conical distribution of the emission dipole of the dye (half angle, Ψ) with respect to the long fibril axis. The dashed line shows the long fibril axis. The rotation of the fibril in the XY microscope sample plane is described by the angle. Aberrations of Ψ due to the molecular rotations in filaments are described by ΔΨ. This figure is from Obstarczyk et al6. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7
Figure 7: Simulated intensity of polarized two-photon excited fluorescence. Fluorescence calculated for (A) Φ = 1°, Ψ = 1°, ΔΨ = 1°; (B) Φ = 1°, Ψ = 30°, ΔΨ = 1°; (C) Φ = 1°, Ψ = 30°, ΔΨ = 60°. Red, blue, and yellow lines correspond to Equation 26, Equation 32, and Equation 26 + Equation 32, respectively. Φ angle describes the rotation of the fibril in the XY microscope sample plane, Ψ – conical distribution of the emission dipole, and ΔΨ– aberrations of Ψ due to the molecular rotations in filaments. All other parameters were identical in all cases: K1 = 2.945, K2 = 0.069, K3 = 1.016, γ = 0.01, and δ = 0.98845. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8
Figure 8: Polar graphs of experimental datasets. (A,B) Exemplary polar graphs after fitting two experimental datasets collected during ps-TPFM measurements of bovine insulin spherulites. Measured Equation 1 and Equation 2 two-photon excited emission components for X and Y emission polarization axis are presented with red and blue dots, respectively; meanwhile, solid lines present the corresponding simulated two-photon excited fluorescence emission components for X and Y emission polarization axis Equation 26 and Equation 32. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

List of Materials

Sample preparation
Coverslips, 24 x 24 mm Chemland 04-298.202.04
DPX mountant for histology Sigma-Aldrich 6522 Slide mountant
Eppendorf Safe-Lock tubes, 1.5 mL, polypropylene Chemland 02-63102
Eppendorf ThermoMixer C Eppendorf Used for spherulite incubation
HLP 5UV Water purification system Hydrolab Source of dionized water used in sample preparation
Hydrochloric acid (≥37%, APHA ≤10), Sigma-Aldrich 30721-M
Insulin powder from the bovine pancreas (≥25 units/mg (HPLC)) Sigma-Aldrich I5500
Methanol (HPLC grade) Sigma-Aldrich 270474
Microscope slides with a concave, 76 x 26 x 1 mm Chemland 04-296.202.09
Olympus BX60 Olympus Polarized Optical Microscope used in Figure 2
PTFE thread seal tape, 12 mm x 12 mm x 0.1 mm, 60 gm2 Chemland VIT131097
Microscope ps-2PFM setup
Chameleon Ultra II Coherent
FELH0800 – Ø25.0 mm Longpass Filter Thorlabs
FESH0700 – Ø25.0 mm Shortpass Filter Thorlabs
IDQ100 photon-counting avalanche photodiodes  ID Quantique
Multiphoton short-pass emission filter 720 nm  Semrock
Mounted Achromatic Half-Wave Plate, 690-1200 nm Thorlabs
Nikon Plan Apo Oil Immersion 100x/1.4 NA Nikon
piezo 3D stage Piezosystem Jena
Polarizing Beamsplitter Thorlabs
S130C – Slim Photodiode Power Sensor, Si, 400 – 1100 nm, 500 mW Thorlabs
Software
LabView 2018 National Instruments Version 18.0.1f2
Matplotlib library Version 3.3.2
NumPy library Version 1.19.2
SciPy library Version 1.5.2
Spyder Python 3 IDE Version 4.1.5

Lab Prep

Compared to its one-photon counterpart, two-photon excitation is beneficial for bioimaging experiments because of its lower phototoxicity, deeper tissue penetration, efficient operation in densely packed systems, and reduced angular photoselection of fluorophores. Thus, the introduction of polarization analysis in two-photon fluorescence microscopy (2PFM) provides a more precise determination of molecular organization in a sample compared to standard imaging methods based on linear optical processes. In this work, we focus on polarization-sensitive 2PFM (ps-2PFM) and its application in the determination of molecular ordering within complex bio-structures-amyloid spherulites. Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s are often diagnosed through the detection of amyloids-protein aggregates formed due to an impaired protein misfolding process. Exploring their structure leads to a better understanding of their creation pathway and consequently, to developing more sensitive diagnostic methods. This paper presents the ps-2PFM adapted for the determination of local fibril ordering inside the bovine insulin spherulites and spherical amyloidogenic protein aggregates. Moreover, we prove that the proposed technique can resolve the three-dimensional organization of fibrils inside the spherulite.

Compared to its one-photon counterpart, two-photon excitation is beneficial for bioimaging experiments because of its lower phototoxicity, deeper tissue penetration, efficient operation in densely packed systems, and reduced angular photoselection of fluorophores. Thus, the introduction of polarization analysis in two-photon fluorescence microscopy (2PFM) provides a more precise determination of molecular organization in a sample compared to standard imaging methods based on linear optical processes. In this work, we focus on polarization-sensitive 2PFM (ps-2PFM) and its application in the determination of molecular ordering within complex bio-structures-amyloid spherulites. Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s are often diagnosed through the detection of amyloids-protein aggregates formed due to an impaired protein misfolding process. Exploring their structure leads to a better understanding of their creation pathway and consequently, to developing more sensitive diagnostic methods. This paper presents the ps-2PFM adapted for the determination of local fibril ordering inside the bovine insulin spherulites and spherical amyloidogenic protein aggregates. Moreover, we prove that the proposed technique can resolve the three-dimensional organization of fibrils inside the spherulite.

Verfahren

Compared to its one-photon counterpart, two-photon excitation is beneficial for bioimaging experiments because of its lower phototoxicity, deeper tissue penetration, efficient operation in densely packed systems, and reduced angular photoselection of fluorophores. Thus, the introduction of polarization analysis in two-photon fluorescence microscopy (2PFM) provides a more precise determination of molecular organization in a sample compared to standard imaging methods based on linear optical processes. In this work, we focus on polarization-sensitive 2PFM (ps-2PFM) and its application in the determination of molecular ordering within complex bio-structures-amyloid spherulites. Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s are often diagnosed through the detection of amyloids-protein aggregates formed due to an impaired protein misfolding process. Exploring their structure leads to a better understanding of their creation pathway and consequently, to developing more sensitive diagnostic methods. This paper presents the ps-2PFM adapted for the determination of local fibril ordering inside the bovine insulin spherulites and spherical amyloidogenic protein aggregates. Moreover, we prove that the proposed technique can resolve the three-dimensional organization of fibrils inside the spherulite.

Tags