Summary

Assessing Antibody-dependent, Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity in Cancer Cells using Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity Reporter Bioassay

Published: September 13, 2024
doi:

Summary

Here, we present a protocol for an antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay using an ADCC bioassay kit. This method offers a valuable tool for elucidating the ADCC mechanism and evaluating the therapeutic potential of antibodies in cancer immunotherapy.

Abstract

The method for antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) represents an important tool to assess the efficacy of therapeutic antibodies in cancer immunotherapy. Evaluating ADCC activity in cancer cells is essential for the development and optimization of antibody-based treatments. Here, we propose a methodological approach of utilizing an ADCC bioassay kit for quantitative assessment of ADCC reaction using thyroid cancer cells as effector cells. The protocol involves the co-culture of effector cells with target cancer cells in different ratios in the presence of a therapeutic antibody. The ADCC bioassay kit used in this experiment includes the genetically engineered effector cells expressing a luciferase reporter gene under the control of Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cell (NFAT) response elements. Upon the binding of the surface antigen on the target cells with the antibodies and effector cells, the effector cells release luciferase, enabling quantification of cytotoxicity through measurement of luminescence signal. In contrast to conventional ADCC assays, this method proved the binding of target antigen with antibodies and effector cells, which can produce reliable results in a short period.

Introduction

Antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is an important mechanism by which antibodies exert immune-mediated cell-killing effects1,2,3. The immune cells are activated by binding to the therapeutic antibody, which interacts with surface antigens of the target cells to release granzymes, perforin, leading to the target cell death. These immune cells include natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils2,3,4,5,6,7. The ADCC assay has become an important tool to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic antibody8,9.

In the conventional ADCC assay, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or natural killer cells are used as effector cells to monitor the efficacy of a therapeutic antibody by quantitating the target's cell death rate. Our method uses an ADCC bioassay kit that includes genetically engineered effector cells expressing a luciferase reporter gene under the control of Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cell (NFAT) response elements. We then quantify the binding of the surface antigen on the target cells with the antibody and the effector cells. This method is based on the ADCC reaction occurring in a short period without requiring human PBMC cells. The experimental steps include the co-culture of effector cells with target cells in the presence of therapeutic antibodies.

During incubation, the therapeutic antibody binds to the target antigen on the surface of the target cells, which leads to the binding of the effector cells and the Fc fragment of an antibody. This activates the NFAT response element and releases luminescence signals for the quantitative assessment of the ADCC reaction.

Before performing the experiment, the expression of the target antigen in the target cells must be confirmed by either flow cytometry or western blotting. Target cells are cultured and passaged into 96-well plates for 24 h before the experiment. Different concentrations of a therapeutic antibody are added together with different cell counts of effector cells to achieve the calculated effector-to-target cell ratio.

Key steps in this method include (1) preparation of target cells and effector cells, (2) effector-to-target cell ratios, (3) Preparation of different concentrations of the antibody, and (4) varying duration of incubation. After the incubation, luminescence signals are measured using a luminometer, providing a quantitative readout of ADCC activity. Compared to other methods for measuring ADCC, this method is relatively simple to operate, and the results are accurate.

The ADCC reporter bioassay indicates the binding of the target antigen, therapeutic antibody, and immune cells in the ADCC pathway activation. This binding activates gene transcription through the NFAT pathway in the effector cells-engineered Jurkat cells with stably expressing FcγRIIIa receptor, the V158 (high-affinity) variant. The NFAT response element mediates the expression of luciferase in the effector cells10,11. The biological activity of the antibody in the Mechanism of action (MOA) of ADCC is quantified through the luciferase signal produced from the NFAT pathway. Luciferase signal in the effector cells-FcγRIIIa receptor-expressing Jurket cells-is quantified using a luminescence reader (Figure 1). The signal-to-noise ratio of the assay is high.

Protocol

1. Detection of EGFR and VEGFR expression in target cells

NOTE: Use western blotting to detect the expression of the target antigen in the target cells.

  1. Sample preparation
    1. Culture the cells (BHT-101 and SW-1736 human thyroid cancer cell lines) in T75 flasks using Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, and 1% antibiotics (Penicillin-Streptomycin).
    2. Harvest the cells when they are 80% confluent by removing the culture media and washing the cells with PBS. Add 5 mL of PBS and scrap the cells using a cell scraper to remove the cells from the culture flask. Transfer the cells into a 15 mL conical tube.
    3. Count the cells with a cell counter.
    4. Aliquot 5 × 106 of BHT-101 and SW-1736 cells into 15 mL conical tubes.
    5. Spin down the cells at 135 × g for 5 min at room temperature. Remove the supernatant PBS.
    6. Lyse the cell pellet by adding 100 µL of RIPA lysis buffer containing protease-phosphatase inhibitors for 5 min on ice. Transfer the lysate to a 2 mL tube, centrifuge at 15,000 × g for 15 min, and transfer the supernatant into new 2 mL tube.
    7. Measure the protein concentration of the cell lysate by using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit.
    8. Aliquot 70 µg of protein from cell lysate from each sample, add 2x Laemmli sample buffer supplemented with 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, and boil the samples at 100 °C for 5 min for denaturation of samples.
  2. Gel electrophoresis and membrane transfer
    1. Prepare 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel using distilled water (4.7 mL), 30% acrylamide (2.7 mL), 1.5 M Tris Buffer, pH 8.8 (2.5 mL), 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (0.1 mL), 10% ammonium persulfate (100 µL), and TEMED (10 µL).
    2. Run 70 µg of the denatured samples in the 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel at 80 V for 20 min and at 120 V for 100 min.
    3. Transfer the protein on the gel to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane at 100 V for 90 min.
    4. After transferring, block the membrane with 7% skim milk diluted in TBS-T buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.6, 140 mM NaCl, 0.2% Tween-20) for 1 h.
  3. Antibody incubation
    1. Incubate the blocked membrane with mouse anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and rabbit anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibodies (diluted at 1:1,000 in 7% skim milk) overnight at 4 °C.
    2. After incubation, wash the membrane thoroughly with Tris-buffered saline-Tween (TBS-T) buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.6, 140 mM NaCl, 0.2% Tween-20) for 7 min and repeat 4x.
    3. Incubate the membrane with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted at 1:4,000 in 7% skim milk (TBS-T)) for 1 h.
    4. After incubation, wash the membrane thoroughly with TBS-T buffer for 7 min and repeat 4 times.
  4. Protein detection
    1. Incubate the membrane in chemiluminescent HRP substrate prepared by mixing 1 mL of HRP substrate peroxide solution with 1 mL of HRP substrate Luminol Reagent (both reagents are from the chemiluminescent substrate kit) for 2 min.
    2. Visualize the membrane using an imaging system.

2. Preparation of target cells

  1. Culture the target T cells, BHT-101 and SW-1736 cells exponentially until 80% confluent in RPMI media supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% antibiotics (Penicillin-Streptomycin) in T-75 flasks.
  2. After removing the media, wash the cells once with PBS. Incubate the cells with 1 ml of non-enzymatic cell dissociation buffer for 5 min to dislodge the adherent cells. Add PBS to stop the reaction of the non-enzymatic cell dissociation buffer. Spin down the cells at 135 × g for 5 min and add 5 mL of PBS.
    NOTE: Here, we use a non-enzymatic cell dissociation buffer to preserve the integrity of membrane surface protein.
  3. Count the cells and seed them at 15,000 cells/wells in 96-well, white polystyrene microplates with a clear, flat bottom.

3. Preparation of varying concentrations of the therapeutic antibody

  1. To follow this protocol, use Cetuximab (chimeric anti-EGFR antibody) to bind EGFR and use Bevacizumab (humanized anti VEGF-A antibody) as a negative control.
  2. Prepare ADCC Bioassay buffer by adding 1.4 mL of low IgG serum into 33.6 mL of RPMI-1640 (supplied in the kit).
  3. Use ADCC Bioassay buffer for the dilution of antibodies. Prepare 400 µL of each antibody in three different concentrations: 30 µg/mL, 3 µg/mL, and 0.3 µg/mL (3x concentration) to get the final concentration of 10 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, and 0.1 µg/mL for wide-spectrum coverage to detect the optimal dose.
    NOTE: Final antibody concentrations are based on 25 µL of cultured target cells, 25 µL of effector cells, and 25 µL of antibody in each well of a 96-well plate.

4. Preparation of effector cells

  1. Store the effector cells at -80 °C before use.
  2. Preheat the ADCC Bioassay Buffer in a 37 °C water bath for at least 30 min before use.
  3. Thaw the ADCC Bioassay Effector cells from -80 °C cold storage by placing them in a 37 °C water bath (approximately 2-3 min). Gently rock and visually inspect the vial, but do not invert it during the thawing process.
  4. Transfer 630ul of Effector cells to a 15 mL tube containing 3.6 mL of ADCC Assay Buffer. Mix well by gently inverting the tube 2x.

5. Incubation of effector cells with antibody and target cells

  1. After overnight incubation, remove the media from the target cells (15,000 cancer cells per well) and add 25 µL of the ADCC Bioassay buffer and 25 µL of Cetuximab (EGFR antagonist) and Bevacizumab (VEGF antagonist) to get the final concentration of 0.1 µg/mL, 1 µg/mL, or 10 µg/mL of the target cells in each well according to Figure 2.
  2. Add 75,000 effector cells in 25 µL of ADCC bioassay buffer per well into the 96-well microplate containing target cells. The wells labeled as No mAb act as no antibody control (Figure 2).
  3. Add ADCC Bioassay buffer to the wells labeled as AB (ADCC Bioassay buffer) for blank control.
  4. Incubate the plate for 6 h.

6. Quantitative readout of ADCC activity

  1. Prepare the luciferase assay reagent 4 h before the measurement by adding Luciferase Assay buffer to the Luciferase Assay Substrate (lyophilized).
  2. After 6 h of incubation of target cells, antibody, and effector cells, add 75 µL of the luciferase assay reagent to each well and incubate for 30 min.
  3. Following the incubation period, measure the luminescence signal in each well by using a luminometer, providing a quantitative readout of ADCC activity.
  4. For data analysis, calculate the fold Induction as follows:
    Fold induction = RLU (antibody induced – background) / RLU (no antibody control – background).
    Where RLU is relative luminescence units; Antibody induced are wells B3 to B8 and C3 to C8; No antibody control = B2 and C2; Background = Average RLU from well A2 to A5 (Figure 2).

Representative Results

The expression of EGFR and VEGFR in the target BHT-101 and SW-1736 cells was detected using western blotting. EGFR expression was detected in both BHT-101 and SW-1736 cells but not VEGFR expression (Figure 3).

Using the ADCC bioassay kit, we detected the ADCC reaction of the anti-EGFR antibody, cetuximab, using EGFR-positive cell lines, BHT-101 and SW-1736, as target cells. Bevacizumab, a VEGF inactivator, was used as a negative control antibody. Different concentrations of antibodies and effector cells were incubated with the target cells. The luminescence signal was detected using a plate reader (Figure 2). A higher fold of ADCC activity induction was found in Cetuximab (anti-EGFR antibody) groups, but no ADCC activity was seen in Bevacizumab (VEGF antagonist) for both cell lines. This demonstrated the ADCC effect targeting EGFR extracellular membrane antigens for both cell lines. By using this method, the ADCC reaction was validated in the presence of Cetuximab in two anaplastic thyroid cancer cell lines (BHT101 and SW1736) (Figure 4).

Figure 1
Figure 1: A schematic diagram showing the ADCC reaction with the ADCC bioassay kit. Antigen-binding sites in the therapeutic antibody bind to surface antigens in target cells. This binding leads to the binding of the Fc portion of the antibody to the FcƳRIIIa receptors of effector cells, which have been genetically engineered with NFAT-RE luc, producing a luminescence signal in the effector cells. This figure was modified from the ADCC Reporter Bioassay Core kit manual with permission12. Abbreviations: ADCC = Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity; Fc = Fragment crystallizable region; NFAT = Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cell; RE = Response element; luc = Luciferase. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Luminescence reading and experimental diagram of 96-well plate design of the ADCC co-culture system. Luminescence signals are read by a luminescence reader. Row A: 1st-9th wells contain ADCC Bioassay Buffer. Row B: 3rd-8th wells contain BHT101's ADCC reaction system (target cells+ antibody + effector cells). The 2nd well is without antibody. The 9th well contains just ADCC Bioassay buffer. Row C: 3rd-8th wells contain SW-1736's ADCC reaction system (target cell+ antibody + effector cells). The 2nd well is without antibody. The 9th well contains just ADCC Bioassay buffer. Row D: 1st-9th wells contain Assay Buffer. Abbreviations: ADCC = Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity; AB = ADCC Bioassay buffer; VEGFR = Vascular Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor; EGFR = Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor; mAb = monoclonal antibody. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Detection of EGFR and VEGFR expression in BHT-101 and SW-1736 thyroid carcinoma using western blotting. Expression of EGFR, but not VEGFR, was detected in both cell lines. B-actin was used as the loading control. Abbreviations: EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; VEGFR = vascular epidermal growth factor. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Fold induction of ADCC activity. (A) Thyroid cancer cell line BHT-101 exhibits an ADCC effect in the presence of the anti-EGFR antibody Cetuximab. (B) The thyroid cancer cell line SW-1736 exhibits an ADCC effect in the presence of the anti-EGFR antibody Cetuximab. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Discussion

Here, we have presented the ADCC Bioassay method for assessing the ADCC reaction of a therapeutic antibody. The method is straightforward and employs a simple “add-mix-read” format for measurement.

Before doing the experiment, the expression of the target antigen in the target cells must be confirmed by either flow cytometry or western blotting. Flow cytometry will be a better tool to detect the surface antigen. However, using flow cytometry can stress the cells, causing apoptosis and affecting the viability of the cell and, therefore, the overall analysis. In addition, it costs more than western blotting. In this experiment, we used western blotting as a faster and more cost-effective method because targeted antigens are known cell surface antigens.

Engineered Jurkat cells, which stably expressed the FcγRIIIa receptor, the V158 (high affinity) variant, and an NFAT response element that drives the expression of firefly luciferase, were used as effector cells. Activation of the NFAT pathway results in the production of luciferase, and its activity is quantified in the form of luminescence readout. The signal also represents the activity of ADCC.

First, target cells (T) are incubated with effector cells (E) in the presence of varying amounts of antibody in 96-well plates for 6 h at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator. The effector:target ratio of 5:1 is used to optimize the signal. For example, 75,000 effector cells were added to 15,000 target cells. At the end of incubation, Bio-Glo luciferase assay reagent is added to each well, incubated for 30 min, and the luminescence (RLU, relative luciferase units) is measured using a luminescence plate reader.

The key critical steps in this protocol are: (1) The handling of effector cells. The cell vial should not be inverted during the thawing process, rock gently, and must be used immediately after thawing to prevent unwanted cell death or affecting the performance of biological detection. (2). It is important to use white polystyrene 96-well microplates with clear, flat bottom for luminescence measurements because the luminescence is captured from the bottom of the reader.

In this study, we observed the stronger and weaker ADCC reactions of the anti-EGFR antibody, cetuximab, depending on the amount of target cells and antibody concentration. Some reasons for handling the calibration of weak ADCC reactions: (1) The readings of the ADCC reporter bioassay come from effector cells (E), with a constant number of 75,000 cells per well in the ADCC reaction system of this study. Therefore, optimizing the quality of target cells (T) is one aspect that can be improved. The E:T ratio in this study was 5:1, which could be adjusted up to 20:1. (2) Antibody concentration is also one of the important factors affecting ADCC reaction. Adjustments can be made through serial dilution of antibodies to explore the optimal concentration range, thus achieving maximum response in the ADCC report. (3) The incubation time of antibodies, target cells, and effector cells is also crucial for experimental results. In this study, we incubated for 6 h, which can be extended up to 24 h to achieve the optimal ADCC reaction. (4) Additionally, the concentration of the buffer solution (low IgG) for ADCC assay also needs to be explored. The optimal serum concentration for ADCC response can be achieved within the range of 1% to 10%.

This experimental method is rapid and straightforward, allowing completion within one day through a simple “add-mix-read” protocol. The results are stable and amenable to batch testing. However, this bioassay kit does not detect cell death like conventional ADCC methods that use PBMC or NK cells as effector cells12,13. Instead, it uses FcγRIIIa receptor expressed Jurkat cells as effector cells, which will cost more because the cells are genetically modified. In comparison to traditional ADCC experiments13,14, it eliminates the requirement of blood donations from healthy individuals and avoids the complex process of extracting immune cells, thus mitigating individual variations that could impact the results. The detected luminescence signals are from the binding of effector cells to target cells, not from the actual death of target cells. Therefore, there may be discrepancies compared to standard ADCC detection methods. Furthermore, cell dissociation buffer, which is more expensive than trypsin, is used to detach the adherent cells to maintain the membrane integrity.

ADCC reporter gene analysis demonstrates excellent accuracy and stability, serving as an efficacy analysis method for the mass detection of therapeutic antibody drugs. It can also function as a critical analysis method for the characterization of therapeutic molecules and process development15.

In summary, ADCC is an important immune mechanism, and the quantitative detection of ADCC holds great importance in the field of immunotherapy. This experimental method offers an effective means for the quantitative measurement of ADCC15.

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. Zeng (IMCB, A*STAR) for supporting this work. This study was supported by the Youth Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (82202231), and the Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province, China (2021KY110,2024KY824).

Materials

0.5% Trypsin-EDTA Gibco 15400-054 Dilute 10x in PBS to make 0.05% Trypsin
1x Tris Buffer Saline (TBS) 1st BASE BUF-3030-1X1L For membrane washing in western blotting
1.5 M Tris Buffer, pH 8.8 1st BASE BUF-1419-1L-pH8.8 For SDS gel preparation
2-Mercaptoethanol Sigma Aldrich M7522-100ML For sample preparation of western blotting
30% Acrylamide/Bis solution Bio-Rad #1610158 For SDS gel preparation
4x Laemmli Buffer Bio-Rad #1610747 For sample preparation of western blotting
96-well white polystyrene microplate with clear flat bottom Corning Incorporated 3610 For ADCC assay
ADCC Bioassay Effector cells (0.65 mL) Promega G7011 Includes in ADCC reporter bioassay core kit (Promega G7010), 1 x 1 vial
ADCC reporter bioassay core kit Promega G7010 Mentioned as ADCC bioassay kit for ADCC assay in this experiment
Ammonium Persulfate Sigma Aldrich A3678-25G For SDS gel preparation
Bevacizumab (Humanized Anti VEGF-antibody) MVASI Use as negative control antibody in ADCC asssay
BHT-101 Leibniz Institute DSMZ ACC279 Human anaplastic papillary thyroid cancer cell line 
Bio-Glo Luciferase Assay Buffer Promega G7941 Includes in ADCC reporter bioassay core kit (Promega G7010), 1 x 10 mL
Bio-Glo Luciferase Assay Substrate (Lyophilized) Promega G7941 Includes in ADCC reporter bioassay core kit (Promega G7010), 1 x 1 vial
Cell scraper GenFollower GD00235 To remove cell from culture flask
Cetuximab (Chimeric anti-EGFR antibody) ERBITUX Use as therapeutic antibody in ADCC assay
Chemiluminescent HRP substrate Merck Millipore WBKLS0500 For protein detection in western blotting
Distilled water Gibco 15230-162 For SDS gel preparation
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) Gibco 10270-106 Culture media supplement
iBright CL1500 imaging system Thermo Scientific 2462621100038 For protein detection in western blotting
L-glutamine, 200 mM Gibco 25030-081 Culture media supplement
Low IgG Serum Promega G7110 Includes in ADCC reporter bioassay core kit (Promega G7010), 1 x 4 mL
Megafuge 8R Thermo Scientific 42876589 Centrifuge
Mouse anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies BD Biosciences 610016 Primary antibody in western blotting
Mouse anti-VEGFR monoclonal antibodies BD Biosciences 571194 Primary antibody in western blotting
non-enzymatic cell dissociation buffer Sigma Aldrich C5789-100ML For cell harvesting from T75 flask
Penicillin-Streptomycin PAN Biotech P06-07100 Antibacterial for culture media
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.2, Sterile filtered 1st BASE CUS-2048-1x1L Use as washing solution for cells
Pierce BCA assay kit Thermo Scientific 23225 To measure protein concentration
Protease and phosphatase inhibitor Thermo Scientific A32959 For protein digestion in sample preparation for western blotting
PVDF membrane (Immobilin-P) Merck Millipore IPVH00010 For protein transfer in western blotting
Rabbit anti-mouse IgG, Fcγ HRP-conjugated secondary antibody Jackson ImmunoResearch 315-035-046 Secondary antibody in western blotting
Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium Capricorn Scientific RPMI-XA Cell culture media
RPMI-1640 Promega G7080 Includes in ADCC reporter bioassay core kit (Promega G7010), 1 x 36 mL
Skim milk powder Merck Millipore 70166-500G For membrane blocking in western blotting
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate 1st BASE BIO-2050-500g For SDS gel preparation
SW-1736 Cytion 300453 Human thyroid squamous cell cancer cell line
T75 culture flasks SPL Lifesciences 70075 Cell culture flask
Tecan Multimode Reader model Spark 10M Tecan 1607000294 for luminicence quantification
TEMED Bio-Rad #1610801 For SDS gel preparation
Tween-20 Promega H5151 For membrane washing in western blotting
Vi-cell XR cell viability analyzer Beckman Coulter AL15072 Cell counter

Referenzen

  1. Zahavi, D., AlDeghaither, D., O’Connell, Enhancing antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity: a strategy for improving antibody-based immunotherapy. Antib Ther. 1 (1), 7-12 (2018).
  2. Fenis, A., Demaria, O., Gauthier, L., Vivier, E. New immune cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 24 (7), 471-486 (2024).
  3. Pinto, S., Pahl, J., Schottelius, A., Carter, P. J. Reimagining antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in cancer: the potential of natural killer cell engagers. Trends Immunol. 43 (11), 932-946 (2022).
  4. Ochoa, M. C., et al. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity: immunotherapy strategies enhancing effector NK cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 95 (4), 347-355 (2017).
  5. Wang, W., Erbe, A. K., Hank, J. A., Morris, Z. S. NK cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 6, 368 (2015).
  6. Chung, S., et al. Characterization of in vitro antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity activity of therapeutic antibodies – impact of effector cells. J Immunol Methods. 407, 63-75 (2014).
  7. Shimasaki, N., Jain, A., Campana, D. NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 19 (3), 200-218 (2020).
  8. Cheng, Z. J., et al. Development of a robust reporter-based ADCC assay with frozen, thaw-and-use cells to measure Fc effector function of therapeutic antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 414, 69-81 (2014).
  9. Parekh, B. S., et al. Development and validation of an antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity-reporter gene assay. MAbs. 4 (3), 310-318 (2012).
  10. Hogarth, P. M., Pietersz, G. A. Fc receptor-targeted therapies for the treatment of inflammation, cancer and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 11 (4), 311-331 (2012).
  11. Chung, S., et al. Quantitative evaluation of fucose reducing effects in a humanized antibody on Fcgamma receptor binding and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity activities. MAbs. 4 (3), 326-340 (2012).
  12. . ADCC Reporter Bioassay Core Kit Technical Manual Available from: https://www.promega.sg/-/media/files/resources/protocols/technical-manuals/101/adcc-reporter-bioassay-core-kit-protocol.pdf?rev=bec36264c0b6470591ded081377d207d&sc_lang=en (2023)
  13. Miller, A. S., Tejada, M. L., Gazzano-Santoro, H. Methods for measuring antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. Methods Mol Biol. 1134, 59-65 (2014).
  14. Lo Nigro, C., et al. NK-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in solid tumors: biological evidence and clinical perspectives. Ann Transl Med. 7 (5), 105 (2019).
  15. Gómez Román, V. R., Murray, J. C., Weiner, L. M., Ackerman, M. E., Nimmerjahn, F. . Antibody Fc. , 1-27 (2014).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Diesen Artikel zitieren
Kuan, K. K. Y., Zhang, K., Ang, K. H., Thura, M., Zheng, W. H. Assessing Antibody-dependent, Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity in Cancer Cells using Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity Reporter Bioassay. J. Vis. Exp. (211), e67077, doi:10.3791/67077 (2024).

View Video