Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Yanjing Wang; Hang Gao; Yi Li; Huan Sun; Lin Liu

doi:10.3791/63598

JoVE Journal > Medicine

Medizin

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Published: July 20, 2022

doi:

10.3791/63598

Yanjing Wang¹, Hang Gao¹, Yi Li¹, Huan Sun*², Lin Liu*¹

¹Radiology Department,China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, ²Cardiology Department,China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University

Summary

The atrial function is associated with the strain and strain rate. The cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) technique was used in this study to quantify left and right atrial global and segmental longitudinal strain and strain rate in individuals with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of arrhythmia. Atrial remodeling is considered the most critical mechanism for the presence and development of atrial fibrillation. Also, atrial remodeling can lead to the enlargement and dysfunction of the left atrium (LA), resulting in thrombosis and heart failure. Functional changes in left atrial strain and strain rate occur before structural alterations and are closely associated with structural remodeling and left atrial fibrosis. These parameters are sensitive biomarkers for atrial function. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is a novel, non-invasive, post-processing technique that can evaluate left atrial strain and strain rate. The CMR-FT was utilized in this investigation to assess the bilateral atrium strain rate in individuals with paroxysmal AF. Modifications in each segmental strain were evaluated using segmental analysis. The CMR-FT is recommended for non-invasive evaluations in the clinical assessment of atrial strain among existing strain imaging techniques. Further, it is a flexible parameter measurement with good reproducibility, high soft-tissue resolution, and post-processing based on standard cine balanced steady-state free precision (bSSFP) long-axis images without requiring a new sequence acquisition.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common tachyarrhythmia, and its prevalence increases with age¹. According to studies, atrial remodeling is intimately associated with the development of atrial fibrillation and can increase the effect of atrial cardiomyopathy². The function of the left atrium (LA) is a crucial indicator and biomarker of subclinical cardiac disorders³. LA function can provide significant diagnostic value reflecting diastolic dysfunction⁴ and determine the onset, course, and prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF)⁵.

The atrial function can be divided into the reservoir, conduit, and booster pump functions corresponding to ventricular systole, early diastole, and late diastole. The reservoir function corresponds to the atrium receiving blood flow from the pulmonary vein to maximum volume when the ventricle is in systole³. During the early diastole of the ventricle, the atrioventricular valve opens, allowing the atrium to serve as a conduit for blood flow from the atria to the ventricle³. When entering late diastole, the atrium aggressively contracts during the booster pump phase to finish ventricular filling³. Irregular morphology and function of the ventricles can directly cause alterations in atrial circulation. The evaluation of changes in this function is essential in understanding the mechanism of whole-heart physiology and hemodynamics. In addition, left atrial enlargement is associated with a bad prognosis for various cardiovascular illnesses⁶. Morphological markers are less sensitive to ventricular and atrial dysfunction than functional strain metrics. Previous studies have demonstrated that changes in left atrial strain and strain rate occur before structural changes, closely related to structural remodeling and myocardial fibrosis in the left atrium⁷^,⁸.

Early atrial strain evaluations were mainly based on echocardiographic speckle tracking⁹^,¹⁰. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can provide enhanced spatial resolution, tissue contrast, and a more precise depiction of the atrial wall's periphery. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) has been used to assess ventricular strain and was later applied to the atrium³. This method has become more prevalent in the monitoring of atrial function. Research has demonstrated that left atrial function is an independent prognostic factor of atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, and relapse of AF after radiofrequency ablation¹⁰^,¹¹^,¹²^,¹³^,¹⁴^,¹⁵. Whereas strain evaluation of the right atrium (RA) by MRI is uncommon, Esra et al. revealed that the RA's reservoir and booster pump function is markedly diminished in individuals with regular atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation (AF)¹⁶. Also, segmental strain analysis can help investigate changes in regional atrial function or remodeling. The present study provides a technical protocol for CMR-FT of the left and right atria and segmental strain and strain rate.

Protocol

This research procedure closely adheres to the rules established by the China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University's human research ethics committee (No. 2021092704). Before radiofrequency ablation, CMR was required for all patients with atrial fibrillation. Hence our study did not place an increasing burden on patients. Right ventricular two-chamber cine bSSFP sequences were added, which extended the time of each examination by 2 min. Before the test, written informed consent was obtained from each subject. Patients who refused the further sequence were eliminated from the experiment. Patients with poor image quality or atrial fibrillation (AF) during the examination were also excluded.

1. Preparation before scanning

Check the patient information: Patients' heart rate, blood pressure, weight, and height were accurately measured. The on-duty physician formulates an introductory sequence based on the health history and other supplementary investigations and confirms quick adjustments to the analysis based on the actual circumstances.
Exclude patients having MRI contraindications including renal insufficiency with eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m², cardiac implantable electronic devices, implanted metal devices, electronic cochlear implantations, etc.
Place the patient in the supine position with their heads up and arms at their sides. Due to the length of the examination, do not raise the upper limb above the head.
Clean the skin and place the electrodes according to the manufacturer's instructions. Ensure that the non-metallic electrocardiogram electrodes are correctly placed on the surface of the front chest wall to obtain precise electrocardiogram gating. An accurate R wave is required to reduce CMR artifacts.
NOTE: After the electrocardiogram electrodes are connected, the patient's electrocardiogram is displayed on the computer in real-time to measure the R wave. Reposition the electrodes on the patient's chest if the R wave is not clear enough.
Place a 16-channel cardiac coil flush to the upper edge of the shoulder blade. Ensure the coil is in-line with the heart and placed to the left.
Ask the patients to hold their breath at the end of exhalation and ask them to maintain the same breath motion amplitude to ensure the consistency of the scanning position. The breath-hold duration was 10-18 s. Patients were provided with sufficient time for respiratory training. During the examination, the heart rate and time of breath-holding were noted.

2. CMR scanning

Use a three-plane localization method to locate the long-axis cine images [two-chamber, three-chamber, and four-chamber views of the left ventricle (LV)] and short-axis of the ventricle (i.e., covering the entire LV). See Figure 1 for the positioning process.
1. Acquire the orthogonal multi-slice localizers in the heart's transverse, sagittal, and coronal slices (Figure 1A).
2. Obtain a two-chamber localizer by selecting a transverse slice at the middle of the ventricle from the transverse images. Set a slice vertically on the transverse image, parallel to the septum, and through the apex of the LV (Figure 1B).
3. Acquire the four-chamber localizer by positioning the slice vertically on the two-chamber localizer through the apex of the heart and the center of the mitral valve (Figure 1C).
4. Acquire the short-axis localizer by positioning the slice vertically on the four-chamber and two-chamber localizers. This slice should be perpendicular to the septum on the four-chamber localizer and at a right angle to the long axis on the two-chamber localizer (Figure 1D).
Based on the above localizers, generate the following standard views.
1. Obtain a four-chamber view.Slice (positioning line) will automatically appear, then position the slice through the center of the LV and vertically on the septum on the short-axis localizer. Place the slice through the apex of the heart and adjust to the center of the mitral valve on the two-chamber localizer to get the four-chamber view. Click on Apply to get the four-chamber view (Figure 1E).
2. Obtain a two-chamber view. On the short-axis localizers, position the slice parallel to the septum, and adjust it to the center of the LV. On the four-chamber view, place the slice parallel to the septum, and through the apex of the LV (Figure 1F).
3. Obtain a three-chamber view: Position the slice through the center of the aorta and the left atrium on the short-axis localizers. Ensure the slice passes through the apex of the LV on the four-chamber view (Figure 1G).
4. Obtain short-axis views. Position the slices vertically on the septum and parallel to the mitral annulus on the four-chamber view. Then, arrange the slices vertically on the connection line between the apex of the LV and the center of the mitral annulus on the two-chamber view (Figure 1H).
Obtain a two-chamber view of the right ventricle (RV) by positioning the slice parallel to the septum and shifting the slice into the center of the RV on the short-axis view. Position the slice parallel to the septum on the four-chamber view, and then shift the slice into the center of the RV. Do not cut the LV into parts (Figure 1I).
Obtain the CMR cine sequences of the two- and four-chamber views of the left and right ventricles, the three-chamber view of the left ventricle, and the short-axis view of the left ventricle using a retrospective ECG gated bSSFP sequence on a 3.0-T MR scanner.
1. Use the main parameter settings as follows: matrix = 192 x 192, field of view (FOV) = 340 mm x 340 mm, repetition time (TR) = 3.0 ms, echo time (TE) = 1.7 ms, flip angle (FA) = 45°-55°, temporal resolution = 30-55 ms, slice thickness = 8 mm, and slice gap = 2 mm.
  NOTE: All the patients should be in the sinus rhythm during CMR imaging.

3. Ventricular and atrial function analysis

Ventricular function analysis
1. Click on PACS, then input Patient ID, and use Search Current Patient to find the images. Next, click on Retrieve to transfer the images to the cardiovascular post-processing workstation. Use the Function Multiplanar module (ventricular function analysis with multiplanar) to analyze the ventricular function.
2. Choose the short-axis cine of the ventricle and click on the Detect LV/RV Contours at ED/ES Phases.
  NOTE: The contours of end-systolic (ED) and end-diastolic (ES) ventricles, endocardium, and epicardium are in all slices and traced automatically. The LV cavity includes the ventricular outflow tract. If the automatic identification is not accurate, it should be adjusted manually. The cardiovascular post-processing workstation automatically calculates the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), right ventricular end-systolic volume (RVESV), right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI), and right ventricular end-systolic volume index (RVESVI).
Left atrial function analysis
1. Use the Tissue Tracking (Feature Tracking) module to measure the LA volumes and strains in the four-, three- and two-chamber cine CMR images of the LV.
2. Manually contour the endocardial and epicardial left atrium (LA) borders at the end of the left atrial systole and diastole (Figure 2).
3. Exclude the pulmonary veins and left atrial appendage from the LA outline.
4. Once the contouring is completed, ensure that the ROI Series (Segment number selection key) is shown as 6 (the four- and two-chamber CMR cine images of the LV are each divided into six segments).
5. Click on the Perform Strain Analysis button for the software to automatically track on-screen pixels during the entire cardiac cycle (25 frames/cardiac cycle).
6. Ensure that the software automatically calculates the left atrial volume/time curves, the global and segmental strain, and the strain rate.
7. Use the volume/time curves to obtain the maximum volume of the left atrium (LAVmax), the left atrial active pre-systolic volume in early left ventricular diastole (LAVpre-A), and the minimum volume of the left atrium (LAVmin). Calculate the LA total, passive, and active emptying fractions (EF) as follows¹⁹:
8. Obtain the peak global longitudinal strain in systole (Sls) and active strain (Sla) from the strain curve of the left atrium (Figure 2) and calculate the difference between the Sls and Sla as the passive strain (Sle)¹⁹.
9. Acquire the peak strain rate of the left atrium in left ventricular systole (SRs) (the first positive wave peak value on the curve), the peak strain rate in early left ventricular diastole (SRe) (the first negative wave peak value on the curve), and the peak strain rate in late left ventricular diastole (SRa) (second negative wave peak on the curve) from the strain rate curve¹⁹ (Figure 2).
Right atrial function analysis
1. Obtain the right atrial volumes and strains using the Tissue Tracking (Feature Tracking) module with the four- and two-chamber RV cine CMR images.
2. Manually contour the endocardial and epicardial right atrium (RA) borders at the end of the right atrial systole and diastole (Figure 3).
3. Exclude the vena cava and right atrial appendage from the RA outline.
4. The subsequent steps were the same as steps 3.2.4 and 3.2.6.
5. Obtain the functional parameters of the right atrium using steps 3.2.3 and 3.2.5.

Representative Results

From July 2020 to August 2021, 243 individuals undergoing MRI scans at our hospital were assessed, and 71 patients with AF who had CMR imaging were ultimately recruited for this study. Patients were excluded based on the following criteria: non-ischemic cardiomyopathy confirmed by CMR examination, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and myocardial amyloidosis (n = 11); myocardial infarction (n = 8); unqualified image quality due to severe CMR artifacts on cine (n = 2); persistent AF (n = 23), and AF during the CMR (n = 6). Finally, 21 patients with paroxysmal AF who were granted an MRI scan with a sinus rhythm were selected for the study. The control group consisted of 19 age and gender-matched individuals with normal CMR. Table 1 summarizes the baseline demographic information of the paroxysmal AF patients and controls.

All CMR images were uploaded to the cardiology post-processing workstation for analysis by two radiologists with more than 5 years of post-processing expertise. The two radiologists averaged the data and re-measured it in cases with significant differences. Aside from the standard characteristics of left and right ventricular function, the parameters of left and right atrial function were examined. The atrial strain parameters included longitudinal strain and strain rate of reservoir, conduit, and booster pump phases (Figure 2 and Figure 3). We conducted segmental (6-segment) strain parameter analysis on the four- and two-chamber views, in addition to the global longitudinal strain, to assess the effect of AF on the atrial longitudinal strain in various segments. The results showed that the left and right atria's global longitudinal strain during the AF group's reservoir phase was significantly lower than in the control group (Figure 4). In the four and two-chamber views, the longitudinal strain of each segment of the left atrium during the reservoir phase was significantly lower than the control group (Figure 5).

Figure 1: Illustration of the three-plane localization. (A) Orthogonal multi-slice localizers; (B) Positioning and two-chamber localizer; (C) Positioning and four-chamber localizer; (D) Slice position and short-axis localizer; (E) Positioning and four-chamber view; (F) Positioning and two-chamber view; (G) Positioning and three-chamber view; (H) Positioning and short-axis view; (I) Positioning and two-chamber view of the right ventricle. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: The left atrial longitudinal strain and strain rate measures using the CMR feature tracking from the four-, three-, and two-chamber cine CMR images. (A–F) Tracking of left atrial endocardial and epicardial borders at the end of the diastole and systole from the four-, three-, and two-chamber cine CMR images. (G–H) The strain and strain rate curves of the left atrium represent the three LA functions: atrial reservoir function (Sls: peak global longitudinal strain in systole; SRs: strain rate in systole), conduit function (Sle: passive strain; SRe: early diastolic atrial strain rate), booster pump function (Sla: active strain; SRa: late diastolic atrial strain rate). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: The right atrial longitudinal strain and strain rate measures using the CMR feature tracking from the four and two-chamber cine CMR images. (A–D) Tracking of right atrial endocardial and epicardial borders at the end of the diastole and systole from the four- and two-chamber cine CMR images. (E–F) The strain and strain rate curves of the right atrium represent the three RA functions: atrial reservoir function (Sls: peak global longitudinal strain in systole; SRs: strain rate in systole), conduit function (Sle: passive strain; SRe: early diastolic atrial strain rate), booster pump function (Sla: active strain; SRa: late diastolic atrial strain rate). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Comparison of the global longitudinal strain of the left and right atria in the AF and control groups during the reservoir phase. (A) The left atrium's global longitudinal strain during the AF group's reservoir phase was significantly lower than the control group (53.17% vs 33.59%, P < 0.05). (B) The global longitudinal strain of the right atrium during the reservoir phase in the AF group was significantly lower than in the control group (49.99% vs 38.08%, P < 0.05). AF: atrial fibrillation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Comparison of the longitudinal strains of the left atrium in the four- and two-chamber views with six segments. (A) The longitudinal strains of the left atrial four-chamber view with six segments during the reservoir phase were significantly lower than the control group. (B) The longitudinal strains of the left atrial two-chamber view with six segments during the reservoir phase were significantly lower than the control group during the reservoir phase. AF = atrial fibrillation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Table 1: Baseline information for the AF and control groups. Please click here to download this Table.

Discussion

Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is the most often utilized MR technology for myocardial strain analysis because it is rapid, simple, and efficient. By measuring the displacement and displacement velocity between two sites of the heart, the strain rate obtained by CMR-FT can be utilized to determine atrial function. Strain is represented as a percentage, indicating the proportional curvature of the myocardium¹⁸.

Strain reflects the deformation ability of the myocardium, while strain rate reflects the deformation speed of the myocardium. The strain curve expanded rapidly during ventricular systole to reach the peak signifying the maximal distortion of the myocardium during atrial diastole. Because of the atrial myocardium's expansion, the strain rate curve generated a positive wave. During this time, the atrium's purpose is to hold return blood flow, which indicates the atrium's diastolic function. Then, the mitral or tricuspid valves opened in the early ventricular diastole, and blood rapidly flowed into the ventricle. At this time, the atrial volume and the myocardial deformation decreased, and the strain curve quickly dropped to enter the plateau stage. The strain rate curve generated the first negative wave, and the atrium served as a route for venous blood flow into the ventricle. The atrium is constricted to pump blood into the ventricle during late ventricular diastole, and the myocardial fibers are contracted. The strain rate curve's myocardial deformation decreased to the baseline level, and the second negative wave developed. By the end of this phase, the atrium volume had been reduced to a minimum level¹⁹^,²⁰.

Recently, it has been confirmed that atrial function is an independent predictor of AF, stroke, and AF recurrence after ablation¹⁰^,¹¹^,¹²^,¹³^,¹⁴^,¹⁵. In an asymptomatic multiethnic group, Habibi et al. discovered that higher LA volumes and decreased passive and total LA emptying fractions are correlated with a higher risk of new-onset AF²¹. A study found that LA's volumetric and functional features are independently related to the occurrence of AF in older patients with stroke risk factors²². Habibi et al. discovered that pre-operative LA strain is lower in patients with recurrence following ablation³. Moreover, Inoue et al. also examined the baseline MR of 169 AF patients who had pre-radiofrequency ablation and discovered that a history of stroke/transient ischemic episode was linked with severely impaired LA reservoir function⁷. Even in patients with low-risk CHADS2 scores, reduced LA strain is still a potentially sensitive marker for the increased risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack¹⁵.

These findings are consistent with our findings that the strain in the LA and RA is reduced in AF patients. In AF patients, the strain in each segment of the atrium is reduced, showing that all the segments are implicated in atrial remodeling. More research is needed to determine whether the strain distribution in the atrium differs between patients with different heart diseases. Close attention should be devoted to the patient's breath training in preparation for the CMR examination. Because images are taken toward the conclusion of the expiratory phase, the same breath range should be used to ensure correct positioning. Before the examination, the patient should be positioned in a suitable position to avoid repositioning due to displacement.

During CMR examination, motion and susceptibility artifacts should be avoided as artifacts leading to unclear boundaries easily affect the atrial wall. Susceptibility artifacts, in particular, should get careful consideration while examining ventricular and atrial artifacts (especially for 3.0T MR). Controlling the patient's heart rate and rhythm is also essential because an abnormal rhythm will prevent the strain value from being available. We introduced the cine sequence at the right ventricular two-chamber to improve the accuracy of the functional analysis of the right atrium since it was necessary to analyze the function of both atria. This is a special aspect of the current methodology compared to normal scans. The endocardium and epicardium of the atrial diastole and systole must be manually demarcated while examining the atrial strain. At this point, care should be taken to choose the appropriate phase and ensure the atrial appendage is excluded from the atrial contour. The operator must estimate the atrial end-diastole based on experience, and among the 25 frames of a cardiac cycle, the phase with the most considerable atrial volume should be chosen. To get the average value, two calculations should be conducted. Delineation of the endocardium and epicardium should be redone if a significant discrepancy between the two is observed.

Echocardiographic speckle tracking, magnetic resonance tagging, and CMR-FT are common strain approaches. The concepts of echocardiographic speckle tracking are similar to those of CMR-FT technology. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of this technique needs to be improved due to limitations such as low spatial resolution, a weak ultrasound acoustic window, and reproducibility²³. The gold standard for myocardial strain is the MR tagging procedure, which is highly reliable. However, picture acquisition and post-processing are difficult and time-consuming processes. Because the atrial wall is thin, this approach is not currently used in atrial strain analysis. Additional sequences are not required for the development of CMR-FT technology. With high spatial resolution cine images and simple post-processing processes, it can be utilized to assess the global and segmental strains of the myocardium²⁴. In addition, research has demonstrated that the strain parameters recorded by CMR-FT are compatible with MR Tagging, confirming the dependability of CMR-FT technology²³^,²⁴. Moreover, a range of CMR-FT post-processing tools is currently available. As a result, strain data may vary significantly between studies due to the absence of a consistent reference standard. Additional large-sample, multicenter research, and updated post-processing software are required to offer an appropriate reference standard.

Nowadays, CMR-FT technology is being utilized in the investigation of atrial function. Mechanistic studies are urgently needed to increase our understanding of atrial cardiomyopathy in clinical practice. Consequently, atrial strain/strain rate as an atrial imaging biomarker will play a crucial role in the prediction, diagnosis, and prognostic evaluation of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Materials

CVI42	Circle Cardiovascular Imaging (Canada)
MAGNETOM Spectra 3.0T	Siemens

Referenzen

Habibi, M., et al. MD1 Short- and long-term associations of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation with left atrial structure and function: A cardiac magnetic resonance study. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 32 (2), 316-324 (2021).
Tsang, T. S., Barnes, M. E., Gersh, B. J., Bailey, K. R., Seward, J. B. Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. American Journal of Cardiology. 90 (12), 1284-1289 (2002).
Inoue, Y. Y., et al. Quantitative tissue-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) of left atrial deformation and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American Heart Association. 4 (4), 001844 (2015).
Singh, A., Addetia, K., Maffessanti, F., Mor-Avi, V., Lang, R. M. LA strain for categorization of LV diastolic dysfunction. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging. 10 (7), 735-743 (2017).
Rodriguez, C. J., et al. Atrial fibrillation incidence and risk factors in relation to race-ethnicity and the population attributable fraction of atrial fibrillation risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Annals of Epidemiology. 25 (2), 71-76 (2015).
Burstein, B., Nattel, S. Atrial fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College Cardiology. 51 (8), 802-809 (2008).
Douglas, P. S. The left atrium-a biomarker of chronic diastolic dysfunction and cardiovascular disease risk. Journal of the American College Cardiology. 42 (7), 1206-1207 (2003).
Rosenberg, M. A., Manning, W. J. Diastolic dysfunction and risk of atrial fibrillation: a mechanistic appraisal. Circulation. 126 (19), 2353-2362 (2012).
Schaaf, M., et al. Left atrial remodelling assessed by 2D and 3D echocardiography identifies paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 18 (1), 46-53 (2017).
Sarvari, S. I., et al. Strain echocardiographic assessment of left atrial function predicts recurrence of atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 17 (6), 660-667 (2016).
Hubert, A., et al. Atrial function is altered in lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in male endurance veteran athletes. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging. 19 (2), 145-153 (2018).
Kuppahally, S. S., et al. Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: Relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging. 3 (3), 231-239 (2010).
Kosmala, W., et al. Incremental value of left atrial structural and functional characteristics for prediction of atrial fibrillation in patients receiving cardiac pacing. Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging. 8 (4), 002942 (2015).
Obokata, M., et al. Left atrial strain provides incremental value for embolism risk stratification over CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score and indicates prognostic impact in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of American Society Echocardiography. 27 (2), 709-716 (2014).
Azemi, T., Rabdiya, V. M., Ayirala, S. R., McCullough, L. D., Silverman, D. I. Left atrial strain is reduced in patients with atrial fibrillation, stroke or TIA, and low risk CHADS(2) scores. Journal of American Society Echocardiography. 25 (12), 1327-1332 (2012).
Ipek, E. G., et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived right atrial functional analysis in patients with atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 59 (2), 381-391 (2020).
Kowallick, J. T., et al. Quantification of left atrial strain and strain rate using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: a feasibility study[J/OL. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 16 (1), 60 (2014).
Peters, D. C., Lamy, J., Sinusas, A. J., Baldassarre, L. A. Left atrial evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: sensitive and unique biomarkers. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. 23 (1), 14-30 (2021).
Buss, S. J., et al. Assessment of myocardial deformation with cardiac magnetic resonance strain imaging improves risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. 16 (3), 307-315 (2015).
Huber, A. T., et al. Cardiac MR strain: A noninvasive biomarker of fibrofatty remodeling of the left atrial myocardium. Radiology. 286 (1), 83-92 (2018).
Habibi, M., et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance-Measured left atrial volume and function and incident atrial fibrillation results from MESA (Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis). Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging. 9 (8), (2016).
Bertelsen, L., et al. Left atrial volume and function assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are maker of subclinical atrial fibrillation as detected by continuous monitoring. Europace. 22 (5), 724-731 (2020).
Claus, P., Omar, A. M. S., Pedrizzetti, G., Sengupta, P. P., Nagel, E. Tissue tracking technology for assessing cardiac mechanics: Principles, normal values, and clinical applications. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging. 8 (12), 1444-1460 (2015).
van Everdingen, W. M., et al. Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 34 (3), 443-456 (2018).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Diesen Artikel zitieren

Wang, Y., Gao, H., Li, Y., Sun, H., Liu, L. Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. J. Vis. Exp. (185), e63598, doi:10.3791/63598 (2022).